[Solved] PowerPoint presentation- help me fix my PPP

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

## **Week 6Group Intervention and Research Design Proposal**

### Assignment

#### Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to design and present a group intervention proposal grounded in an evidence-based practice that addresses the needs of a specific population served by your practicum agency. Through the development of a group research design, this project aims to apply research methods and utilize empirical evidence to inform, assess, and enhance services. The recorded presentation will demonstrate your ability to integrate competencies related to research-informed practice and program evaluation.

#### Course Outcomes

This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes:

– CO 5: Apply research methods and evidence to inform, assess, and improve social work practices, social welfare policies, and social welfare programs (Competency 4, 6, 7).

#### Due Date

Students must complete the Group Intervention and Research Design Proposal assignment

**Directions**

Complete this assignment following the steps for each section below.

**Section 1: Video**

1. You are to propose a group intervention and research design proposal using an existing evidence-based practice to serve a population served by your practicum agency.
2. The proposal must be a recorded slide show with narration for your Agency Instructor, classmates, and course instructor to review.
3. The recording must be between 7 and 10 minutes.
4. Organize your presentation and slide deck using the format outlined below. You should have no more than 14 slides.
5. Immediately following each slide number and title heading, follow the instructions.
6. Please remember this is a narrated video in which you are using the slides to answer questions. Use speaker notes to organize your thoughts. **Do** **not read directly from each slide.** Each slide should have no more than 40 words.
7. You are encouraged to share your video presentation with your Agency Instructor and discuss it during supervision.

**Section 2: Organization and Delivery**

Organize your slide deck (PowerPoint presentation) and presentation using the following outline and format:

01. **Slide 1:** Create a title that informs the audience what they can expect. The title slide should include your name and the date.
02. **Slide 2: About the Organization.** Briefly describe your practicum site.
03. **Slide 3: Target Population.** Briefly describe the target population for the group intervention.
04. **Slide 4: About the Group Intervention – Part 1.** Briefly describe the evidence-based practice or program by describing (1) the intervention, (2) its goals, and (3) its essential components.
05. **Slide 5: About the Group Intervention – Part 2.** Briefly describe the (1) frequency, intensity, and duration of the intervention, (2) setting, and (3) resources (including staffing) needed to implement the intervention with fidelity.
06. **Slide 6: Implementation Plan.** Briefly describe how the intervention would be implemented. Be sure to include information on training, fidelity measures, costs, and other resources necessary to implement the intervention.
07. **Slide 7: Research Question.** What is your research question or hypothesis?
08. **Slide 8: Dependent Variables.** What are your dependent variables (identify at least two), and how will they be operationalized? Describe your use of measures and your rationale for choosing these measures.
09. **Slide 9: Data Collection.** How long will it take for you to collect data? Describe your use of pre- and post-tests and when they will be administered.
10. **Slide 10: Recruitment.** Briefly describe your recruitment strategy for participants/research subjects.
11. **Slide 11: Research Design.** Describe the research design you have selected for this proposal and your rationale for why it was chosen. Consider the needs of the agency and the ethics guiding your choice.
12. **Slide 12: Control Group.** Briefly describe your methods for creating a control group. Describe your rationale for using (or not using) randomization. If randomization is used, describe your procedures.
13. **Slide 13: Reporting Results.** Describe how you will communicate results back to your practicum and participants.
14. **Slide 14: References**. Include all references using APA format.

**Section 3: Format**

1. Use at least three academic and relevant sources not found in this lesson.
2. Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references.
3. Correctly cite and use in-text citations.
4. Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, professional writing.
5. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

Once you complete the recording, please check the quality of the video to make sure the picture is clear and the sound is audible. If the video is not audible, the instructor will not accept it, and you will automatically receive a zero.

You must upload the video file to My Media in Canvas. Links to online video-sharing platforms will not be accepted. Go to My Media in Canvas and click Media Upload. Drag and drop the file or choose the file to upload. All standard video formats (e.g., MP4) are accepted. This will save your video to Kaltura Media. When you are ready to submit your assignment, click “Start Assignment.” Next, click Text Entry. In the Rich Content Editor, click Embed Kaltura Media. Locate your video and click Embed. After you have embedded your video, click Submit Assignment.

## Rubric

**MSW545_W6_Assignment Rubric** MSW545_W6_Assignment RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo Length **10 ptsExcellent7–10 minutes, clear narration, engaging delivery8 ptsProficientSlightly over/under time5 ptsNeeds ImprovementTime is significantly off0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo video** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlide Design **10 ptsExcellentSlides are visually appealing, concise (≤40 words), and support narration8 ptsProficientSlides mostly clear, minor wordiness5 ptsNeeds ImprovementSlides cluttered or hard to follow0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo slides** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarration **5 ptsExcellent7–10 minutes, clear narration, engaging delivery4 ptsProficientSlightly over/under time2.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementTime is significantly off0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo video** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle **5 ptsExcellentTitle is engaging and reflects content4 ptsProficientThe title is clear but generic2.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementTitle is vague or missing key info0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or incomplete** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbout the OrganizationDescription of practicum site **5 ptsExcellentClear, concise, and relevant description4 ptsProficientClear, concise, and relevant description2.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVague or lacks relevance0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or off-topic** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTarget Population **5 ptsExcellentWell-defined, specific, and relevant to the agency4 ptsProficientDefined but lacks specificity or depth2.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementUnclear or overly broad0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or irrelevant** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup Intervention Pt. 1Intervention, goals, components **10 ptsExcellentThorough explanation with strong evidence base8 ptsProficientMostly clear, minor gaps in explanation5 ptsNeeds ImprovementLimited detail or weak connection to evidence0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or poorly explained** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup Intervention Pt. 2Frequency, setting, resources **10 ptsExcellentAll elements are clearly described and feasible8 ptsProficientMost elements are described but some lack clarity5 ptsNeeds ImprovementElements are vague or unrealistic0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or poorly developed** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation PlanTraining, fidelity, costs, resources **10 ptsExcellentDetailed, feasible, and well-supported plan8 ptsProficientMostly complete, some elements underdeveloped5 ptsNeeds ImprovementPlan lacks depth or feasibility0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or vague** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch QuestionClear and researchable question **10 ptsExcellentFocused, relevant, and clearly stated8 ptsProficientRelevant but could be more focused5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVague or too broad0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or unclear** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDependent VariablesVariables and operationalization **10 ptsExcellentClearly defined, measurable, and justified8 ptsProficientMostly clear, rationale could be stronger5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVariables unclear or poorly justified0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or incorrect** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData CollectionTimeline **10 ptsExcellentClear timeline with appropriate pre/post-tests8 ptsProficientMostly clear, some gaps in timing or testing5 ptsNeeds ImprovementTimeline or testing unclear or incomplete0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or not feasible** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecruitmentStrategy for participant recruitment **10 ptsExcellentEthical, feasible, and clearly described8 ptsProficientMostly clear, some gaps in feasibility5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVague or unrealistic strategy0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch DesignDesign and rationale **10 ptsExcellentAppropriate, ethical, and well-justified8 ptsProficientMostly appropriate, rationale could be stronger5 ptsNeeds ImprovementDesign lacks clarity or ethical consideration0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControl GroupControl group and randomization **10 ptsExcellentClear rationale and procedures, ethically sound8 ptsProficientMostly clear, some details missing5 ptsNeeds ImprovementVague or ethically questionable0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing** 10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReporting ResultsCommunication of findings **5 ptsExcellentClear, ethical plan for sharing results4 ptsProficientMostly clear, some gaps in communication2.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementPlan is vague or impractical0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or not addressed** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSourcesIncluded at least three academic and relevant references **5 ptsExcellentAll sources recent, relevant, and correctly cited4 ptsProficientMinor APA errors or slightly outdated sources2.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementMultiple APA errors or weak sources0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMissing or not APA formatted** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA StyleAll citations and references are in correct APA format **5 ptsExcellent0-1 errors.4 ptsProficient2 errors.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement3 errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactory4 or more errors.** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting RequirementsCommunicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors. **5 ptsExcellent0-1 errors.4 ptsProficient2 errors.2.5 ptsNeeds Improvement3 errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactory4 or more errors.** 5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction **0 ptsNo Points DeductedSubmitted on time0 ptsPoints DeductedNot Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day) Score of 0 if more than 7 days late** 0 pts

Total Points: 150

## Textbooks and Resources

## Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

– **Title: Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association** Authors: American Psychological AssociationPublisher: American Psychological Association (APA)Publication Date: 2019-10-01Edition: 7thAPA CitationAmerican Psychological Association. (2020). _Publication manual of the American Psychological Association_(7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
– **Title: Research Methods in Social Work** Authors: David RoysePublisher: CognellaPublication Date: 2024-12-03APA CitationRoyse, D. (2025). _Research methods in social work_ (9th ed.). Cognella.
– **Title: Intersectional Approach to Human Behavior in the Social Environment** Authors: Elisabeth Counselman CarpenterPublication Date: 2024-11-07APA CitationCounselman-Carpenter, E. (2025). _An intersectional approach to human behavior in the social environment: Decolonizing theory to practice_ (1st ed.). Cognella.
– **Title: Generalist Social Work Practice** Authors: Janice GaskerPublisher: SAGE PublicationsPublication Date: 2023-02-12APA CitationGasker, J. (2023). _Generalist social work practice_ (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
– **Title: Social Policy for Effective Practice: A Strengths Perspective** Authors: Rosemary Kennedy Chapin, Melinda LewisPublisher: RoutledgePublication Date: 2023-03-31Edition: 6thAPA CitationKennedy Chapin, R., & Lewis, M. (2023). _Social policy for effective practice: A strengths perspective_ (6th ed.). Routledge.

– [\
\
MSW545_Week6_Group_Intervention_Proposal.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/msw545-week6-group-intervention-proposal-pptx "MSW545_Week6_Group_Intervention_Proposal.pptx")