[Solved] Business Finance – Operations Management Can someone do my Week 2 assignment in DOC700?

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

Learning Plan: Integrating Feedback

[WLO: 3] [CLO: 2]

Prepare

In this assignment, you will continue developing your Learning Plan. Last week you created a statement of purpose. This week you will address the importance of feedback in your growth as a doctoral student.

Scholarly writing requires clear arguments, logical organization, and precise language. Feedback helps writers identify vague statements, logical gaps, or weak evidence so they can revise for stronger communication. The ability to integrate feedback is essential to scholarly writing because it strengthens both the writer’s development and the quality of the work, and actively seeking feedback ensures that your work is clear and precise, which builds credibility.

Integrating feedback also requires a growth mindset to understand that mistakes are part of learning. A growth mindset can help to reframe feedback as not yet mastered instead of I failed. Feedback is a gift! The iterative nature of doctoral-level scholarship may require multiple rounds of receiving and integrating feedback, so having self-awareness, being able to self-regulate your emotions, maintain open communication, and apply advice constructively when receiving feedback are critical aspects of emotional intelligence that support personal and professional growth.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

Read the following articles:

Leadership Spotlight: Feedback and Emotional IntelligenceLinks to an external site.

Navigating Contradictions While Learning to Write: A Disciplinary Case Study of a First-Term Doctoral WriterDownload Navigating Contradictions While Learning to Write: A Disciplinary Case Study of a First-Term Doctoral Writer

Thanks, but No-Thanks for the FeedbackLinks to an external site.

Review the Decoding & Applying FeedbackLinks to an external site. webpage.

Revise

This assignment will be a continuation of the Learning Plan you started in your Week 1 assignment. Review the feedback you received on your Learning Plan: Statement of Purpose assignment in Week 1.

Revise your Learning Plan: Statement of Purpose assignment based on feedback using track changes in Word. For help, refer to the Writing Center’s Using Track ChangesLinks to an external site. resource.

Include your revised draft as Appendix A to this week’s written assignment. For help, refer to the Writing Center’s Tables, Images, & AppendicesLinks to an external site. resource.

Write

In your paper, include these elements:

Introduction (approximately 1 paragraph in length)

State the purpose of the paper in one clear and concise sentence.

Indicate the elements you will include in your paper.

Role of Feedback in Doctoral Study (approximately 1–2 paragraphs in length)

Differentiate how feedback is received in the context of doctoral study (such as from faculty, peers, committees, publication reviewers, etc.).

Appraise the role of feedback as it relates to the iterative nature of doctoral writing.

Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Feedback (approximately 2–3 paragraphs in length)

List at least five benefits doctoral students receive when integrating feedback from others.

Assess what benefits are most transferable to a professional setting.

Analyze potential difficulties (such as emotional resistance, conflicting feedback, time constraints, etc.) that may interfere with your ability to effectively integrate feedback as a doctoral student.

Strategies for Effectively Integrating Feedback (approximately 2–3 paragraphs in length)

Evaluate how a doctoral student can approach feedback with a growth mindset.

Create a plan for integrating feedback from faculty on your written work in your doctoral program, including steps you will take to strengthen areas where you may have opportunities for improving your feedback integration skills.

Conclusion (approximately 1 paragraph in length)

Summarize the overarching themes expressed in your paper.

Justify your readiness and commitment to developing strong feedback integration skills.

The Learning Plan: Integrating Feedback paper

must include your revised version of your Learning Plan: Statement of Purpose as Appendix A to your Integrating Feedback paper.

must be at least 1100 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site. resource.

must include a separate title page with the following in title case:

title of paper in bold font (Doctoral Learning Plan in this case)

Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

student’s name

name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

course name and number

instructor’s name

due date

must utilize academic voice.

Review the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance.

must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.

Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

For assistance on writing Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. and Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources.

must cite at least 3 scholarly peer-reviewed sources in addition to the required resources for this week.

The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.

To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, refer to this Quick and Easy Library ResearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site. guide.

must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.

Refer to the APA: Formatting Your References ListLinks to an external site. resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

Carefully review the grading rubric below and follow the Assignment Submission InstructionsLinks to an external site..

This assignment will be assessed on a 10-point scale and is worth 3% of your final grade.

Rubric

DOC700 W2A1 11.25

DOC700 W2A1 11.25

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Prompts

1 pts

Distinguished

Addresses all assignment prompts and adheres to length requirements.

0 pts

Non-Performance

Does not address all assignment prompts and/or does not adhere to length requirements.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Analysis

3 pts

Distinguished

Provides thorough and exemplary analysis of topics covered; conclusions are logically based on evidence presented; examples are provided to amplify main points.

2.55 pts

Proficient

Provides detailed analysis of topics covered; conclusions are logically based on evidence presented; examples may be provided to amplify main points.

2.1 pts

Basic

Provides adequate analysis of topics covered; conclusions may not be logically based on evidence presented; few examples are provided to amplify main points.

1.65 pts

Below Expectations

Analysis of topics covered is incomplete; conclusions may not be based on evidence presented; examples are not provided, or examples do not amplify main points.

0 pts

Non-Performance

No critical thinking and analysis are demonstrated; conclusions are not based on evidence presented.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Requirement

0.5 pts

Distinguished

Exceeds the number of scholarly sources providing compelling evidence to support ideas; the majority of sources are published in the last five years; there is limited use of non-peer reviewed sources.

0.43 pts

Proficient

Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas; most sources are published in the last five years; there is limited use of non-peer reviewed sources.

0.35 pts

Basic

Uses the required number of scholarly sources as evidence; sources may not fully support ideas; many sources may not have been published in the last five years; the number of non-peer reviewed sources used may exceed the number of peer-reviewed sources.

0.28 pts

Below Expectations

Uses an inadequate number of current scholarly sources as evidence.

0 pts

Non-Performance

No resources are included, or they lack the components described in the instructions.

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Accuracy

1.5 pts

Distinguished

Consistently cites more than two sources to effectively support ideas in each paragraph (excluding introductory and summary paragraphs); no sources are cited consecutively; all citations accurately represent source material.

1.28 pts

Proficient

Consistently cites at least two sources to support ideas in each paragraph (excluding introductory and summary paragraphs); no sources are cited consecutively; all citations accurately represent source material.

1.05 pts

Basic

Does not consistently cite at least two sources to partially support ideas in each paragraph; the same source may be cited consecutively; sources may represent only one point of view or conclusion; all citations accurately represent course material.

0.83 pts

Below Expectations

Cites an inadequate number of sources to support ideas; sources may represent only one point of view or conclusion; citations do not accurately represent source material.

0 pts

Non-Performance

Does not cite sources to support ideas or sources cited are not synthesized.

1.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure

0.75 pts

Distinguished

There is a logical, cohesive structure; each paragraph has a strong topic sentence and smoothly transitions to the next paragraph; supports clarity and flow.

0.65 pts

Proficient

There is an organized structure; transitions are generally effective.

0.53 pts

Basic

There is some organized structure present, but it may be inconsistent or confusing.

0.41 pts

Below Expectations

There is weak structure; poor transitions are ineffective and impede clarity.

0 pts

Non-Performance

There is no clear structure, and the assignment lacks coherence.

0.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Voice

0.75 pts

Distinguished

Academic voice and word choice is engaging, consistent, and appropriate; limited use of passive voice; language enhances meaning.

0.65 pts

Proficient

Academic voice is clear; language is appropriate with few lapses.

0.53 pts

Basic

Academic voice is somewhat inconsistent; language is occasionally vague or inappropriate.

0.41 pts

Below Expectations

Academic voice is weak or inconsistent; language used hinders clarity.

0 pts

Non-Performance

Academic voice is inappropriate or absent; language is ineffective.

0.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Conventions

0.75 pts

Distinguished

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and verb-agreement are virtually error-free; no more than two errors per page are present.

0 pts

Non-Performance

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and verb-agreement contain errors that affect readability; more than two errors per page are present.

0.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting

0.75 pts

Distinguished

Title page, margins, headings, citations, and references are properly formatted; no more than three errors are present in entire draft.

0 pts

Non-Performance

Title page, margins, headings, citations, and references are not properly formatted; more than three errors are present in entire draft.

0.75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes the Previous Learning Plan Assignment with Revisions

1 pts

Distinguished

Includes the previous Learning Plan assignment as an Appendix and fully addresses previous feedback.

0.7 pts

Basic

Includes the previous Learning Plan assignment as an Appendix. Partially addresses previous feedback.

0 pts

Non-Performance

Does not include the previous Learning Plan assignment as an Appendix and does not address previous feedback.

1 pts

Total Points: 10

– [\
\
Week1AssignmentLearningPlan.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week1assignmentlearningplan-docx "Week1AssignmentLearningPlan.docx")