My Blog

Category: Law > Criminal

  • [Solved] Formerly incarcerated

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Write a **600- to 700-word executive summary** to introduce the grant proposal of **Formerly incarcerated** that you have been compiling throughout the course as if you were a grant writer for an agency that supports the selected initiative. In your executive summary, describe the key information fr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Write a **600- to 700-word executive summary** to introduce the grant proposal of **Formerly incarcerated** that you have been compiling throughout the course as if you were a grant writer for an agency that supports the selected initiative.
    In your executive summary, describe the key information from the components of your proposal in the following order:
    – Describe the organization you selected and the project you are applying for. Summarize the needs statement and explain why the project is important to the affected community.
    – Summarize what is included in the project activity and how it will be completed. Describe how you will evaluate the success of the outcome of the project.
    – Summarize the total amount of the anticipated budget for the project and the amount you are requesting from this organization.
    – Explain why your agency would be the best recipient of the funding for this project. Note the credentials of the individuals who will be influential to the project.
    Compile your **complete grant proposal**. Your proposal should total 3,000–4,000 words and include revisions of previously submitted components based on feedback from your prior assessments. Ensure that it includes all of the following components:

  • [Solved] final

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## final.docx **## final.docx** 2 The Final Exam is worth 120 points and focuses on content in Weeks 5-8, with the ability to apply concepts related to the Masters and Ethical Schools covered in Week 2. The exam is comprised of three (3) essay questions, worth 40 points each. It is an open-book ex…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## final.docx

    **## final.docx**

    2

    The Final Exam is worth 120 points and focuses on content in Weeks 5-8, with the ability to apply concepts related to the Masters and Ethical Schools covered in Week 2. The exam is comprised of three (3) essay questions, worth 40 points each.

    It is an open-book exam with a 120-minute time limit.

    **## final.docx**

    2

    The Final Exam is worth 120 points and focuses on content in Weeks 5-8, with the ability to apply concepts related to the Masters and Ethical Schools covered in Week 2. The exam is comprised of three (3) essay questions, worth 40 points each.

    It is an open-book exam with a 120-minute time limit.

  • [Solved] Assistance 9

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attachment – ## ResearchProposalInstructions.docx **## ResearchProposalInstructions.docx** **Topic: Does Staffing Shortages Intensify the Harmful Effects of Overcrowding in U.S. Correctional Facilities** Propose a potential research project. A research proposal offers a description of the design…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attachment

    – ## ResearchProposalInstructions.docx

    **## ResearchProposalInstructions.docx**

    **Topic: Does Staffing Shortages Intensify the Harmful Effects of Overcrowding in U.S. Correctional Facilities**

    Propose a potential research project. A research proposal offers a description of the design of your study, and includes a review of the relevant theoretical, empirical, and methodological literature in your area. In general, the research proposal will contain the same sections as would be seen in a journal article, published in a peer-reviewed journal. In this project,
    **you will NOT gather data or do any analysis**, so this is where the research proposal qualitatively differs from a typical published journal article (no results, no discussion/conclusion). As you will technically
    have no results to report, you will be using a different tense than would be the case in a full manuscript (e.g., you will propose to test your hypotheses, instead of actually testing the hypotheses).
    **To reiterate, the proposal simply represents the front end (first three sections) of an empirical manuscript: an introduction, a review of the literature, and a detailed section on the data and methods to be used in the project.**

    **_Introduction (2-3 pages)._** Why should we be interested in this topic? Who cares? What
    is the purpose in conducting this research? What is the proposed impact of your study?
    What are you attempting to discover and/or explain? Why should professionals/academics in the field of criminology/criminal justice be interested in your topic/research question? In other words, you should make a concerted effort to explain to your audience why your topic/study is important to them – discuss the significance of this research! It is always a good idea in this section to include descriptive, statistical evidence of the problem that you are investigating. To make a long story short, you are trying to elicit the reader’s interest in this section – sell your craft!

    **_Literature Review (3-5 pages)._** In virtually every circumstance, you are not the first scholar to investigate this topic – and even if you are looking at the topic in a unique way, others have likely conducted research in your general area. As such, the literature review offers a thorough rendering of what others have said/found about your topic. In essence, the review of the literature provides the narrative of your topic – it tells the story. The literature review not only offers an overview of the current empirical status of your topic, but it is also an excellent opportunity for the researcher to uncover gaps in the extant literature, or to generate new ideas. Many of my own studies are birthed by conducting a review of the literature within a given area.

    For purposes of this project, students are strongly encouraged to find
    **8-10 professional sources (e.g., published articles/books/book chapters)**. The articles should be scholarly, peer-reviewed, research articles that are published in a refereed journal. The sources should be selected based on their relevance to your study: either on methodological or theoretical/conceptual grounds. When conducting the review of the literature, be sure to properly, and frequently, cite your sources throughout (APA or ASA format is required), refraining from the overuse of direct quotes – i.e., paraphrase these works by putting it in your own words.

    It is imperative that your literature review flows, or transitions, smoothly. In other words,
    please refrain from issuing a blow-by-blow account of the studies that you have selected –
    — that is what an annotated bibliography does. Toward this end, you should incorporate
    the use of transitional sentences and paragraphs (start with an opening paragraph that
    introduces the literature review), that offer a nice segue as you move between topics. As
    you are concluding your literature review, you should offer a summary of the current
    state of the extant literature in your area. Here, you should articulate some of the gaps in
    the literature or limitations of previous work – and hopefully how your particular study
    will explicitly address some of these limitations. In other words, this is the transitional
    period of the proposal, in which you move from previous studies to your own study.
    Either at the end of your literature review, or the very beginning of the data and methods
    section, you should include your hypothesis(es) – an explicit statement statement about
    the relationship between your independent and dependent variable(s). This can be done
    in a few (2-3) sentences. The literature review will generally inform your hypothesis.

    **_Data and Methods (2-3 pages)._** This section is the most formulaic and technical of the
    proposal. First, you begin by describing the data that will be used in your study. Who
    will be the participants? Where will the data be collected? How (questionnaire,
    interviews, participant observation, ethnography, content analysis) will the data be
    collected? Will the data be publicly available (if so, describe the original data collection),
    or will you have to independently collect your own? If you are collecting your own data,
    describe the procedures that will be involved to get the data (for example, if you are
    conducting a qualitative study, how long will you be interviewing your participants?
    How many times will you observe them? How many people will be observed?). What is
    the unit of analysis (i.e., individuals, groups, social artifacts, etc.) ? What is the target
    population? How will you sample the population, given that you cannot access the entire
    population? How generalizeable will the results be, coming from this sample? Discuss
    potential advantages and disadvantages of this research design.

    In the methods portion of the data and methods section, students should begin by
    restating their hypothesis. Next, offer a clear, explicit articulation of the procedures
    (operationalization strategy) that will be employed to measure your independent and
    dependent variables, as well as 5 control variables (usually demographic variables like
    sex, age, class, education, race).

    Lastly, you need to include a brief section on the analytic strategy that will be used in
    your research. For instance, will you be conducting quantitative research, and if so, what
    types of statistical analyses will be conducted?

    **Note:** I realize that these recommendations/suggestions are ideal types (best case
    scenarios), but in general this is how these sections should be structured.
    Requirements/Format:

    **The final proposal should be between no shorter than 10, and no longer than 15, double-spaced pages, INCLUDING references (but not the title page).** The paper is expected to be written in a manner as if it were to be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal (APA or ASA style is required).

    **## ResearchProposalInstructions.docx**

    **Topic: Does Staffing Shortages Intensify the Harmful Effects of Overcrowding in U.S. Correctional Facilities**

    Propose a potential research project. A research proposal offers a description of the design of your study, and includes a review of the relevant theoretical, empirical, and methodological literature in your area. In general, the research proposal will contain the same sections as would be seen in a journal article, published in a peer-reviewed journal. In this project,
    **you will NOT gather data or do any analysis**, so this is where the research proposal qualitatively differs from a typical published journal article (no results, no discussion/conclusion). As you will technically
    have no results to report, you will be using a different tense than would be the case in a full manuscript (e.g., you will propose to test your hypotheses, instead of actually testing the hypotheses).
    **To reiterate, the proposal simply represents the front end (first three sections) of an empirical manuscript: an introduction, a review of the literature, and a detailed section on the data and methods to be used in the project.**

    **_Introduction (2-3 pages)._** Why should we be interested in this topic? Who cares? What
    is the purpose in conducting this research? What is the proposed impact of your study?
    What are you attempting to discover and/or explain? Why should professionals/academics in the field of criminology/criminal justice be interested in your topic/research question? In other words, you should make a concerted effort to explain to your audience why your topic/study is important to them – discuss the significance of this research! It is always a good idea in this section to include descriptive, statistical evidence of the problem that you are investigating. To make a long story short, you are trying to elicit the reader’s interest in this section – sell your craft!

    **_Literature Review (3-5 pages)._** In virtually every circumstance, you are not the first scholar to investigate this topic – and even if you are looking at the topic in a unique way, others have likely conducted research in your general area. As such, the literature review offers a thorough rendering of what others have said/found about your topic. In essence, the review of the literature provides the narrative of your topic – it tells the story. The literature review not only offers an overview of the current empirical status of your topic, but it is also an excellent opportunity for the researcher to uncover gaps in the extant literature, or to generate new ideas. Many of my own studies are birthed by conducting a review of the literature within a given area.

    For purposes of this project, students are strongly encouraged to find
    **8-10 professional sources (e.g., published articles/books/book chapters)**. The articles should be scholarly, peer-reviewed, research articles that are published in a refereed journal. The sources should be selected based on their relevance to your study: either on methodological or theoretical/conceptual grounds. When conducting the review of the literature, be sure to properly, and frequently, cite your sources throughout (APA or ASA format is required), refraining from the overuse of direct quotes – i.e., paraphrase these works by putting it in your own words.

    It is imperative that your literature review flows, or transitions, smoothly. In other words,
    please refrain from issuing a blow-by-blow account of the studies that you have selected –
    — that is what an annotated bibliography does. Toward this end, you should incorporate
    the use of transitional sentences and paragraphs (start with an opening paragraph that
    introduces the literature review), that offer a nice segue as you move between topics. As
    you are concluding your literature review, you should offer a summary of the current
    state of the extant literature in your area. Here, you should articulate some of the gaps in
    the literature or limitations of previous work – and hopefully how your particular study
    will explicitly address some of these limitations. In other words, this is the transitional
    period of the proposal, in which you move from previous studies to your own study.
    Either at the end of your literature review, or the very beginning of the data and methods
    section, you should include your hypothesis(es) – an explicit statement statement about
    the relationship between your independent and dependent variable(s). This can be done
    in a few (2-3) sentences. The literature review will generally inform your hypothesis.

    **_Data and Methods (2-3 pages)._** This section is the most formulaic and technical of the
    proposal. First, you begin by describing the data that will be used in your study. Who
    will be the participants? Where will the data be collected? How (questionnaire,
    interviews, participant observation, ethnography, content analysis) will the data be
    collected? Will the data be publicly available (if so, describe the original data collection),
    or will you have to independently collect your own? If you are collecting your own data,
    describe the procedures that will be involved to get the data (for example, if you are
    conducting a qualitative study, how long will you be interviewing your participants?
    How many times will you observe them? How many people will be observed?). What is
    the unit of analysis (i.e., individuals, groups, social artifacts, etc.) ? What is the target
    population? How will you sample the population, given that you cannot access the entire
    population? How generalizeable will the results be, coming from this sample? Discuss
    potential advantages and disadvantages of this research design.

    In the methods portion of the data and methods section, students should begin by
    restating their hypothesis. Next, offer a clear, explicit articulation of the procedures
    (operationalization strategy) that will be employed to measure your independent and
    dependent variables, as well as 5 control variables (usually demographic variables like
    sex, age, class, education, race).

    Lastly, you need to include a brief section on the analytic strategy that will be used in
    your research. For instance, will you be conducting quantitative research, and if so, what
    types of statistical analyses will be conducted?

    **Note:** I realize that these recommendations/suggestions are ideal types (best case
    scenarios), but in general this is how these sections should be structured.
    Requirements/Format:

    **The final proposal should be between no shorter than 10, and no longer than 15, double-spaced pages, INCLUDING references (but not the title page).** The paper is expected to be written in a manner as if it were to be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal (APA or ASA style is required).

  • [Solved] FInal One

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering FInal One.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Criminal Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## capitalMurder.docx **## capitalMurder.docx** For the term paper, your need to choose a topic about one aspect of capital punishment. After choosing the topic you should pick one of the perspectives that we cover in the class. You need to use scholarly materials to support your statements. The f…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## capitalMurder.docx

    **## capitalMurder.docx**

    For the term paper, your need to choose a topic about one aspect of capital punishment. After choosing the topic you should pick one of the perspectives that we cover in the class. You need to use scholarly materials to support your statements. The final product will be a 7-9 pages that will include the following: 1. General introduction of topic and explaining why you think it is important 2. Defining main concepts and arguments of your theoretical framework. 3. A brief analysis of your findings and a conclusion, 4- References and appropriate citations.

    Note: You need to follow the APA style for your citations and references. Submit to Turnitin.com

    **## capitalMurder.docx**

    For the term paper, your need to choose a topic about one aspect of capital punishment. After choosing the topic you should pick one of the perspectives that we cover in the class. You need to use scholarly materials to support your statements. The final product will be a 7-9 pages that will include the following: 1. General introduction of topic and explaining why you think it is important 2. Defining main concepts and arguments of your theoretical framework. 3. A brief analysis of your findings and a conclusion, 4- References and appropriate citations.

    Note: You need to follow the APA style for your citations and references. Submit to Turnitin.com

  • [Solved] Evolution

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Evolution.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Interviews with Sexual Assault Victims: Trauma-Informed Techniques and Communications

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Interviews with Sexual Assault Victims: Trauma-Informed Techniques and Communications** **No directly quoted material may be used in this project.** For this Project, you are to assume the role as Commander of the Criminal Investigations Division (CID) of a large police department. Recently, you w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Interviews with Sexual Assault Victims: Trauma-Informed Techniques and Communications**
    **No directly quoted material may be used in this project.**
    For this Project, you are to assume the role as Commander of the Criminal Investigations Division (CID) of a large police department. Recently, you were approached by another department’s Chief (located in Maryland) that has received criticism for its handling of several sexual assault investigations. Complaints from survivors, and advocates sitting in on law enforcement interviews, included insensitive treatment during interviews, victim-blaming questions, issues with language used in reporting documentation (i.e. had sexual intercourse v. nonconsensual sexual assault) lack of consistent follow-up and communication, and failure to provide information about supportive services during and beyond the investigation.
    You have been approached because your department underwent significant changes and updated Standard Operating Procedures to ensure [investigative approaches are consistent with trauma-informed practices](https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/all/s/SexualAssaultGuidelines.pdf). From this, community assessments of survivors’ experiences have shown increased trust in the reporting process, improved community-police relationships, and an overall increase in reports of sexual assault.
    For this Project, you have been asked to provide an 8-page department training and procedures guide for the Chief of the partner department that includes [recommendations on investigations techniques and treatment of sexual assault survivors](https://evawintl.org/wp-content/uploads/Module-5_Victim-Interview.pdf).
    **Required Research & Analysis:**
    01. Provide a brief background on the crime of sexual assault, including prevalence rates, vulnerable populations, and barriers to reporting.
    02. Offer analysis regarding how historical rape laws and current rape myths have influenced investigative approaches.
    03. Suggest what [topical education](https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/all/i-j/IACP%20Sexual%20Assault%20Response%20Policy%20and%20Training%20Content%20Guidelines.2017.3.23.pdf) should be required for officers and detectives interacting with victims reporting sexual assault and explain why?
    04. Address what training is required for detectives in order to insure interviews with victims are consistent with [trauma-informed techniques](https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/Final%20Design%20Successful%20Trauma%20Informed%20Victim%20Interviewing.pdf)?
    05. What considerations should departments make regarding timelines of initial victim interviews and follow-up interviews given our [current understanding of trauma exposure and memory recall](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usmJ0YEpOec)?
    06. How is [trauma memory recall](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usmJ0YEpOec) different from our traditional understanding of considerations when assessing reliable memory?
    07. How has [the FETI interview approach](https://www.army.mil/article/130936/army_civilian_develops_interview_method_to_help_unlock_memories_reduce_revictimization) been shown to combat the consequences of trauma and why does this approach provide more reliable and valid data?
    08. How should law enforcement expect survivors of sexual assault to act during interviews?
    09. What considerations should be made when documenting reports of sexual assault?
    10. What information, notice, and support should be provided to all victims under [Maryland victims’ rights laws](https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/4954-maryland)? Are there any special requirements for victims of sexual assault?
    11. What do Maryland law guidelines suggest in terms of victim treatment by law enforcement?
    12. How do positive victim experiences with law enforcement impact overall reporting rates, crime data, and ultimately the resources dedicated to policing and solvability of sexual assault cases?
    **Required Support:** You must cite to course materials to support your analysis in your memo. Your memo should include a References Page with at least 5 resources from the course using the American Psychological Association (APA) formatting standards. Refer to the APA information found in Content -> Course Overview -> Course Resources.
    **Required Formatting:**
    – While it may be possible to adequately cover the material in under 8 pages, that is the minimum length recommended to ensure you fully answer the questions asked.
    – Paper must be double spaced, Times-New Roman, 12-point font and 1” margins all around.
    – All APA 7th edition format requirements must be followed (cover page, in text citations, references page). Refer to the APA information found in Content -> Course Overview -> Course Resources.
    – You must have at least 5 resources to support your thoughts/opinions/information.  These must be cited both in text as well as at the end of the document. Your paper should not contain direct quotes, sourced material must be paraphrased.

  • [Solved] ethical dilemmas

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **No directly quoted material may be used in this project.** Ethical dilemmas permeate the criminal justice. At every level, in each segment of the system, people are exercising discretion that will influence the fate of an individual and/or the security of the community. Incongruous laws, regula…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **No directly quoted material may be used in this project.**
    Ethical dilemmas permeate the criminal justice. At every level, in each segment of the system, people are exercising discretion that will influence the fate of an individual and/or the security of the community. Incongruous laws, regulations, policies and practices create conflicts and distort the basis upon which judgments are made. Very often these conflicts result in an ethical dilemma. Which is the appropriate course of action? What is the moral/ethical rational for the decisions that were made? What purposes or principles are served? This project will ask you to consider a sequence of decisions (do, or not do) all of which contribute, directly or indirectly the final scene.
    For each of the three (3) scenarios, your assignment is to:
    –  Examine each situation and describe the ethical and/or moral question,
    –  Describe what you believe to be the motivation of the actor and the potential consequences of BOTH/EACH options,
    –  Identify the decision you believe the actor SHOULD make, and
    –  Provide the **ethical basis** for your decision.
    –  Connect the ethical basis for your decision to ethical theories introduced at the beginning of the course and explain the rational for this connection.
    –  Each decision must be considered separately and not be influenced by earlier decisions and/or actions.
    This assignment is an opportunity for the student to demonstrate their understanding of ethics and value-based decisions. Most of these situations do not have a single correct answer. Grading is NOT based on solving the problem that is presented to the actor but in identifying the ethical dilemmas and determining and explaining the most ethical course of action.
    ### **1. The judge**
    Judge Jeffery Owens is very troubled by the felony case before him.  The defendant, Woodrow Wilson, had been found guilty of armed robbery of a liquor store.  The case alleged that Wilson had a handgun in plain sight when he entered the Sin-Yon liquor store, that he hit the owner in the head with the weapon and forced him to open the cash drawer. Fleeing the scene on foot, Woodrow only got a few blocks before responding police officers spotted him and made the arrest. The prosecutor, armed with the recovered cash, video surveillance and an eyewitness as evidence had an easy case. Now it is time for sentencing.
    Jeffery saw the demonstration of business owners in the hallway when he entered the courthouse that morning. They were chanting “Justice for our victims” and were demanding a lengthy prison sentence. The Pre-Sentence Investigation report said Wilson was suffering from acute addiction and associated mental problems that had caused these violent (but not criminal) outbreaks in the past. There is no information in the file that Wilson has ever received treatment for his disorders. Jeffery knows that, due to budget cuts, the state prison system has very little in the way of addictive or behavioral disorder treatment programs. The prisons had reverted to merely warehousing inmates. However, he had read that the county jail had received a federal grant to establish exactly the kind of services that it appeared Wilson needed. Obviously, he had no way of knowing if this or any treatment would be successful for Wilson.
    Sentencing guidelines were established to ensure that defendants convicted of similar offenses received similar punishments. According to the sentencing guidelines, Wilson should be sentenced to 5-7 years in the state correctional prison system. Jeffery knows that the business community was calling for the maximum sentence. The county jail only took inmates sentenced to eighteen months or less. What sentence should Judge Owens impose on Mr. Wilson?
    ### **2. The District Attorney**
    Jessica ran a successful campaign for district attorney on a very conservative platform generally critical of the incumbent's inability or unwillingness to prosecute police misconduct with criminal charges. The city’s police chief did not support her campaign. He felt that administrative actions that could result is fines, suspensions, demotion or termination of employment were sufficient punishment. Additionally, victims could sue an officer in civil court if the officer acted outside the scope of their authority and immunity.  The chief felt that these consequences should be sufficient for any police misconduct except, perhaps, a felony. Since her election Jessica has brought criminal charges of larceny against one officer for switching city tires off his patrol car on to his personal car. She also brought assault charges against an officer when she learned a suspect needed medical treatment for wrist abrasions due to her handcuffs being too tight. Recently several assistants have cautioned her that they are losing criminal cases, including serious felony cases, because police officers are either not appearing to testify at court or are having "difficulty remembering" critical details during their testimony. This started in traffic court but has also occurred in misdemeanor trials as well. The feeling is these officers are retaliating against the district attorney's officer for the criminal charges being brought against members of the police force.  The pattern is quite clear and getting worse. Prosecutors are complaining that police detectives are “too busy” to return their calls. Jessica understands she cannot successfully prosecute criminal cases without the cooperation of the police department. At the same time, she feels as though she is being bullied by an overly protective autocratic police chief. She feels she can and should prosecute police officer for any criminal offense …and feels that her election demonstrated that the community agrees with her. What should Jessica do?
    ### **3. The Officer**
    Scot is still on probation as a police department rookie. While on probation he can be dismissed at any time for any reason and would not be entitled to a trail board or hearing prior to dismissal.
    During the course of his patrol duties Scot has cause to stop a car for a legitimate but minor traffic violation. The motorist was highly agitated at being stopped “for no reason” and, using a variety of obscene references and racial slurs, adamantly expressed how upset he was. Agitated, Scot told the man to exit the vehicle and place his hands on the hood of his car. Scot looked through the car interior, and then took the keys out of the ignition to open the trunk. Seeing what Scot was doing the driver told Scot to stop and that he could absolutely not search the trunk of the car.  Ignoring this, Scot opened the trunk and discovered in plain view a large, clear plastic bag containing thousands of pharmaceutical-type capsules. Scot could hear the driver screaming, “That ain’t mine. That ain’t mine.”  Scot suddenly realized he has committed an illegal search. What should Scot do?
    ### **Format Requirements**
    – Paper must be double spaced, 11 or 12 pt font and 1” margins all around.
    – All APA 7th edition format requirements must be followed (cover page, in text citations, reference page). Refer to the APA information found in Content -> Course Overview -> Course Resources.
    – You must have resources to support your thoughts/opinions/information.  These must be cited both in text as well as at the end of the document. Your paper should not contain direct quotes, sourced material must be paraphrased.

  • [Solved] DB Response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached. – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## DiscussionThreadWK7.docx **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx** CJUS 410 **Discussion Assignment Instructions** You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached.

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## DiscussionThreadWK7.docx

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 410

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format and 1 biblical citation. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include scholarly journals (not the textbook but should include the Bible, etc.).

    **## DiscussionThreadWK7.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Criminal Procedure and Scripture**

    Each of the scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic. All scriptures are from the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by meditating on the given scriptures. You may even want to pray about them. Psalm 119:18 recommends this prayer: “Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law.” Once you have done that, answer the questions below.

    **Witnesses**

    · Deuteronomy 19:15 "One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."

    · Deuteronomy 17:6 "On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness."

    **Cross Examination**

    · Proverbs 18:17 "The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him."

    · Deuteronomy 19:16–19 "If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime, the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother, then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you."

    **Physical Evidence**

    · Deuteronomy 22:13–18 "If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” then the girl’s father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl’s father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, ‘I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.’ But here is the proof of my daughter’s virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him."

    · Exodus 22:12-13 "But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner. If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, he shall bring in the remains as evidence and he will not be required to pay for the torn animal."

    **Answer the following questions for your thread:**

    · Did these scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?

    · How does our current system deal with each topic?

    · How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?

    **## DiscussionThreadWK7.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Criminal Procedure and Scripture**

    Each of the scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic. All scriptures are from the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by meditating on the given scriptures. You may even want to pray about them. Psalm 119:18 recommends this prayer: “Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law.” Once you have done that, answer the questions below.

    **Witnesses**

    · Deuteronomy 19:15 "One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."

    · Deuteronomy 17:6 "On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness."

    **Cross Examination**

    · Proverbs 18:17 "The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him."

    · Deuteronomy 19:16–19 "If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime, the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother, then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you."

    **Physical Evidence**

    · Deuteronomy 22:13–18 "If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” then the girl’s father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl’s father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, ‘I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.’ But here is the proof of my daughter’s virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him."

    · Exodus 22:12-13 "But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner. If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, he shall bring in the remains as evidence and he will not be required to pay for the torn animal."

    **Answer the following questions for your thread:**

    · Did these scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?

    · How does our current system deal with each topic?

    · How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 410

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format and 1 biblical citation. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include scholarly journals (not the textbook but should include the Bible, etc.).

    **## DiscussionThreadWK7.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Criminal Procedure and Scripture**

    Each of the scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic. All scriptures are from the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by meditating on the given scriptures. You may even want to pray about them. Psalm 119:18 recommends this prayer: “Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law.” Once you have done that, answer the questions below.

    **Witnesses**

    · Deuteronomy 19:15 "One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."

    · Deuteronomy 17:6 "On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness."

    **Cross Examination**

    · Proverbs 18:17 "The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him."

    · Deuteronomy 19:16–19 "If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime, the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother, then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you."

    **Physical Evidence**

    · Deuteronomy 22:13–18 "If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” then the girl’s father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl’s father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, ‘I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.’ But here is the proof of my daughter’s virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him."

    · Exodus 22:12-13 "But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner. If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, he shall bring in the remains as evidence and he will not be required to pay for the torn animal."

    **Answer the following questions for your thread:**

    · Did these scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?

    · How does our current system deal with each topic?

    · How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    CJUS 410

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format and 1 biblical citation. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include scholarly journals (not the textbook but should include the Bible, etc.).

    **## DiscussionThreadWK7.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Criminal Procedure and Scripture**

    Each of the scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic. All scriptures are from the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by meditating on the given scriptures. You may even want to pray about them. Psalm 119:18 recommends this prayer: “Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law.” Once you have done that, answer the questions below.

    **Witnesses**

    · Deuteronomy 19:15 "One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."

    · Deuteronomy 17:6 "On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness."

    **Cross Examination**

    · Proverbs 18:17 "The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him."

    · Deuteronomy 19:16–19 "If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime, the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother, then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you."

    **Physical Evidence**

    · Deuteronomy 22:13–18 "If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” then the girl’s father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl’s father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, ‘I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.’ But here is the proof of my daughter’s virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him."

    · Exodus 22:12-13 "But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner. If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, he shall bring in the remains as evidence and he will not be required to pay for the torn animal."

    **Answer the following questions for your thread:**

    · Did these scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?

    · How does our current system deal with each topic?

    · How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Systematic Rev.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The Term Paper Assignment is designed to expand upon, but not copy or restate, the previous assignment(prisma diagram, attached) . For this assignment, students will create a systematic review that includes and expands upon the program evaluation described in a previous assignment. References and co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The Term Paper Assignment is designed to expand upon, but not copy or restate, the previous assignment(prisma diagram, attached) . For this assignment, students will create a systematic review that includes and expands upon the program evaluation described in a previous assignment. References and concepts but not verbiage from prior assignments are to be used to complete this assignment. In this systematic review of the evaluation literature for the selected criminal justice program, students will synthesize the existing evaluation literature and present the overall process/outcome findings.
    The Term Paper Assignment will consist of at least 15 double-spaced pages (excluding title page, references, figures, illustrations, or other extraneous elements outside the main body of the paper). Students will format their paper using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. Students will use at least 15 scholarly references(SELECTED REFERENCES BELOW)  (Wikipedia or blogs CANNOT be used as a reference). APA 7th Edition guidelines are to be followed. The structure of the assignment must include the following mandatory headings and subheadings:
    – Title Page
    – Abstract
    – Introduction (with your Thesis statement)
    – Methods
    – Study Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
    – Literature Search
    – Data Synthesis Methods
    – Findings
    – Discussion
    – Theoretical Framework
    – Policy and Practice Recommendations
    – Conclusion
    – References
    TOPIC: Implementation of Body Worn Cameras in Correctional Facilities
    PLEASE USE REFERENCES BELOW – ATTACH AI REPORT.
    **A. Correctional Officer Accountability and Use of Force**
    1. Lawrence, D. S., White, M. D., Coldren, J. R., & Peterson,      B. E. (2024). Effects of correctional body-worn cameras on responses to      resistance: A randomized controlled trial in a jail setting. Justice Quarterly. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2024.2327301](https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2024.2327301)
    2. White, M. D., Peterson, B. E., Lawrence, D. S.,      Cunningham, N., & Coldren, J. R. (2024). Deploying body-worn cameras      in a jail setting: Impacts and lessons learned. National Institute of Justice. [https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/deploying-body-worn-cameras-jail-setting-impacts-and-lessons-learned](https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/deploying-body-worn-cameras-jail-setting-impacts-and-lessons-learned)
    3. Peterson, B. E., White, M. D., & Lawrence, D. S.      (2023). Body-worn cameras in a correctional setting: Assessing jail deputy      attitudes before, during, and after implementation. NIJ Journal, 285, 1–13. [https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/body-worn-cameras-correctional-setting-assessing-jail-deputy-attitudes-during](https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/body-worn-cameras-correctional-setting-assessing-jail-deputy-attitudes-during)
    4. Inzana, R. (2024). The role and use of prison cameras      for accountability. The      Prison Journal, 104(3), 355–376. [https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862241272333](https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862241272333)
    5. Willis, J. J., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2022).      Understanding compliance and resistance among correctional officers under      surveillance. Criminal      Justice Policy Review, 33(5), 475–497.
    **B. Inmate and Staff Perceptions of Legitimacy and Fairness**
    1. Dodd, N. (2024). Body-worn camera activation in      prisons: Decision-making and legitimacy concerns among correctional      officers. Crime,      Law and Social Change, 82, 421–440. [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-023-00380-7](https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-023-00380-7)
    2. Braga, A. A., & Ariel, B. (2023). Body-worn cameras      and procedural justice: Evidence from correctional environments. Criminology & Public Policy, 22(1), 145–173.
    3. Gaub, J. E., & White, M. D. (2020). Officer      perceptions of body-worn cameras in correctional settings. Policing: An International Journal, 43(2),      247–265.
    4. Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D.      P. (2019). Beyond the patrol car: Extending the legitimacy framework to      correctional institutions. Law      & Society Review, 53(4), 910–935.
    5. Koper, C. S., Taylor, B. G., & Mayo-Wilson, E.      (2021). A systematic review of the impacts of body-worn cameras on      criminal justice outcomes. Campbell      Systematic Reviews, 17(1). [https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1131](https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1131)
    **C. Institutional Safety, Policy Implementation, and Technology Integration**
    1. Wilson, R., Collier, S., & Hewitt, S. (2021). What      evidence supports the use of body-worn cameras in inpatient or custodial      settings? BMC      Psychiatry, 21(1), 1–12. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299804/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299804/)
    2. White, M. D., & Coldren, J. R. (2020). Body-worn      cameras in corrections: Challenges, lessons, and future directions. Corrections Policy and Practice Journal, 9(2),      102–119.
    3. Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Willis, J. J. (2019).      Understanding the diffusion of technology in corrections: Lessons from      police body-worn camera adoption. Justice      Evaluation Journal, 2(3), 257–276.
    4. PowerDMS. (2020). Developing body-worn camera policy in      corrections. Policy Learning Center. [https://www.powerdms.com/policy-learning-center/developing-body-worn-camera-policy-in-corrections](https://www.powerdms.com/policy-learning-center/developing-body-worn-camera-policy-in-corrections)
    5. Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2019). Prison      technology and correctional reform: Evaluating evidence-based tools for      institutional safety. Criminal      Justice Review, 44(1), 32–51.
    \
    PRISMA_2020_flow_diagram_CRJ7501.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/prisma-2020-flow-diagram-crj7501-pdf "PRISMA_2020_flow_diagram_CRJ7501.pdf")