Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Please see attached for instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx
**## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx**
SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT
Submission Type:
A written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length. Details below.
Details:
CASE Study: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the value of health information technology in the prevention and detection of errors, as well as analysis of unintended consequences and human factors through quality improvement strategies.
1. Review the following video and documents on the case study. *
_RaDonda Vaught speaks out_ l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQELinks to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQE). (4:56).
Lusk, C. (2022). Reconsidering the application of systems thinking in healthcare: the RaDonda Vaught case. Available at
[https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltextLinks to an external site.](https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltext)
State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at
[https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf) Note pages 5-6, 50-51.
1. Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.
A. Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.
B. Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.
I. Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.
C. Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.
D. List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.
2. Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.
2. Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).
2. Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.
2. Create a communication/transition plan.
2. Develop a staff education plan on changes.
4. What change theory would be best for this program?
4. What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?
2. Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:
5. Cognitive
5. Psychomotor
5. Effective
2. Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.
3. Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.
*Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate.
**## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx**
SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT
Submission Type:
A written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length. Details below.
Details:
CASE Study: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the value of health information technology in the prevention and detection of errors, as well as analysis of unintended consequences and human factors through quality improvement strategies.
1. Review the following video and documents on the case study. *
_RaDonda Vaught speaks out_ l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQELinks to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQE). (4:56).
Lusk, C. (2022). Reconsidering the application of systems thinking in healthcare: the RaDonda Vaught case. Available at
[https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltextLinks to an external site.](https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltext)
State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at
[https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf) Note pages 5-6, 50-51.
1. Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.
A. Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.
B. Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.
I. Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.
C. Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.
D. List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.
2. Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.
2. Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).
2. Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.
2. Create a communication/transition plan.
2. Develop a staff education plan on changes.
4. What change theory would be best for this program?
4. What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?
2. Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:
5. Cognitive
5. Psychomotor
5. Effective
2. Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.
3. Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.
*Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate.