Category: Psychology

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Studying Lifespan Development

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Discussion Post **files (1)** – ## 25577822.htm **## 25577822.htm** ## You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site. Global Navigation Menu PSY603 Foundational Concepts of Lifespan Development.pdf [Skip To Content](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/studying-lifespan-developmen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Discussion Post

    **files (1)**

    – ## 25577822.htm

    **## 25577822.htm**

    ## You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

    Global Navigation Menu

    PSY603

    Foundational Concepts of Lifespan Development.pdf

    [Skip To Content](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/studying-lifespan-development#content) [Dashboard](https://uagc.instructure.com/)

    – ![Donna Smith](https://uagc.instructure.com/images/messages/avatar-50.png)

    Account

    –

    Dashboard

    –

    Courses

    –

    Calendar

    –

    Inbox

    –

    History

    –

    Help

    [Close](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/studying-lifespan-development#)

    **## 25577822.htm**

    ## You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

    Global Navigation Menu

    PSY603

    Foundational Concepts of Lifespan Development.pdf

    [Skip To Content](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/studying-lifespan-development#content) [Dashboard](https://uagc.instructure.com/)

    – ![Donna Smith](https://uagc.instructure.com/images/messages/avatar-50.png)

    Account

    –

    Dashboard

    –

    Courses

    –

    Calendar

    –

    Inbox

    –

    History

    –

    Help

    [Close](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/studying-lifespan-development#)

  • [Solved] MAT MILESTONE 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED **files (3)** – ## MAT202YourPaceMilestone2.docx – MAT202YourPaceMilestone2Data.xlsx – AnaCastroMATMilestone2.mpx **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone2.docx** ## MAT 202 Milestone 2 **Application-Based Assessment: Continuous Probability Distributions Using Minitab** ****Scenario:** TechFlow Man…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    **files (3)**

    – ## MAT202YourPaceMilestone2.docx

    – MAT202YourPaceMilestone2Data.xlsx
    – AnaCastroMATMilestone2.mpx

    **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone2.docx**

    ## MAT 202 Milestone 2

    **Application-Based Assessment: Continuous Probability Distributions Using Minitab**

    ****Scenario:** TechFlow Manufacturing produces high-precision electronic components for aerospace applications. As the new Quality Control Analyst, you've been tasked with analyzing three critical aspects of their production process to ensure products meet stringent aerospace standards.**

    ****Download the dataset: MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data** and import it into Minitab.**

    ****Submission:** Submit your Word document with all graphs, charts, and outputs and your .mpx Minitab file.**

    ****Dataset Description****

    ****File:** MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data**

    **The dataset contains 500 observations with the following variables:**

    **· ComponentID: Unique identifier for each component**

    **· ProcessingTime: Time (in minutes) required to machine each component**

    **· WaitTime: Time (in minutes) customers wait for technical support**

    **· FailureTime: Time (in hours) until component failure in stress testing**

    ****Part A: Continuous Probability Density Functions****

    ****Background****

    **You need to understand the fundamental properties of continuous probability distributions to properly analyze TechFlow's quality metrics.**

    ****A1. Theoretical Foundation****

    **Using the Processing Time data from your dataset:**

    **a) Import the ‘MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data’ file into Minitab and create a histogram of the Processing Time variable. Based on the shape of the distribution, identify what type of continuous distribution this appears to follow.**

    **b) Calculate the sample mean and standard deviation of the processing time using Minitab's descriptive statistics function.**

    **c) For any continuous probability distribution, explain why P(X = k) = 0 for any specific value k. Demonstrate this concept using your processing time data by calculating P(X = 30.0000) exactly.**

    ****Part B: Uniform Probability Distributions****

    ****Background****

    **TechFlow's customer service department has found that customer wait times follow a uniform distribution. You need to analyze this distribution to improve service efficiency.**

    ****B1. Distribution Identification and Parameters****

    **a) Using Minitab, create a histogram of the ‘Wait Time’ variable with appropriate bin settings. Verify that this data appears to follow a uniform distribution.**

    **b) From your sample data, estimate the parameters a and b for the uniform distribution U(a,b). Use Minitab to find the minimum and maximum values of wait time.**

    **c) Write the probability density function f(x) for this uniform distribution, including the range of x values.**

    ****B2. Probability Calculations****

    **d) Calculate the mean and standard deviation for this uniform distribution using the Minitab.**

    **e) Using the uniform distribution properties, calculate:**

    **· P(Wait Time < 8 minutes)**

    **· P(Wait Time > 15 minutes)**

    **· P(5 < Wait Time < 12 minutes)**

    ****B3. Percentile Analysis****

    **f) Management wants to ensure that 90% of customers wait less than a certain time. What should this target time be?**

    ****B4. Conditional Probability****

    **g) A customer has already been waiting for 10 minutes. What is the probability they will wait more than 15 minutes total? Use the conditional probability approach for uniform distributions presented in the provided materials for this section as “the first way” approach.**

    ****Part C: Exponential Probability Distributions****

    ****Background****

    **Component failure times in stress testing follow an exponential distribution. This analysis is crucial for determining warranty periods and reliability standards.**

    ****C1. Distribution Verification and Parameters****

    **a) Using Minitab, create a histogram of the Failure Time variable. Does this appear to follow an exponential distribution? What characteristics support this conclusion?**

    **b) Calculate the sample mean of failure times using Minitab. For an exponential distribution, this sample mean estimates the parameter μ (mean time between failures).**

    **c) Calculate the decay parameter m = 1/μ for this exponential distribution.**

    ****C2. Reliability Analysis****

    **b) Using the exponential distribution properties, calculate:**

    **· P(Failure Time > 20 hours)**

    **· P(Failure Time < 10 hours)**

    **· P(15 < Failure Time < 30 hours)**

    **c) Find the median failure time (50th percentile) using Minitab's percentile function.**

    **d) Management wants to set a warranty period such that only 10% of components fail within the warranty period. What should this warranty period be?**

    ****C3. Memoryless Property****

    **e) A component has already been operating successfully for 20 hours. What is the probability it will operate for at least another 10 hours?**

    **MAT202YourPaceMilestone2Data.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat202yourpacemilestone2data-xlsx)

    **AnaCastroMATMilestone2.mpx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anacastromatmilestone2-mpx)

    **AnaCastroMATMilestone2.mpx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anacastromatmilestone2-mpx)

    **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone2.docx**

    ## MAT 202 Milestone 2

    **Application-Based Assessment: Continuous Probability Distributions Using Minitab**

    ****Scenario:** TechFlow Manufacturing produces high-precision electronic components for aerospace applications. As the new Quality Control Analyst, you've been tasked with analyzing three critical aspects of their production process to ensure products meet stringent aerospace standards.**

    ****Download the dataset: MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data** and import it into Minitab.**

    ****Submission:** Submit your Word document with all graphs, charts, and outputs and your .mpx Minitab file.**

    ****Dataset Description****

    ****File:** MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data**

    **The dataset contains 500 observations with the following variables:**

    **· ComponentID: Unique identifier for each component**

    **· ProcessingTime: Time (in minutes) required to machine each component**

    **· WaitTime: Time (in minutes) customers wait for technical support**

    **· FailureTime: Time (in hours) until component failure in stress testing**

    ****Part A: Continuous Probability Density Functions****

    ****Background****

    **You need to understand the fundamental properties of continuous probability distributions to properly analyze TechFlow's quality metrics.**

    ****A1. Theoretical Foundation****

    **Using the Processing Time data from your dataset:**

    **a) Import the ‘MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data’ file into Minitab and create a histogram of the Processing Time variable. Based on the shape of the distribution, identify what type of continuous distribution this appears to follow.**

    **b) Calculate the sample mean and standard deviation of the processing time using Minitab's descriptive statistics function.**

    **c) For any continuous probability distribution, explain why P(X = k) = 0 for any specific value k. Demonstrate this concept using your processing time data by calculating P(X = 30.0000) exactly.**

    ****Part B: Uniform Probability Distributions****

    ****Background****

    **TechFlow's customer service department has found that customer wait times follow a uniform distribution. You need to analyze this distribution to improve service efficiency.**

    ****B1. Distribution Identification and Parameters****

    **a) Using Minitab, create a histogram of the ‘Wait Time’ variable with appropriate bin settings. Verify that this data appears to follow a uniform distribution.**

    **b) From your sample data, estimate the parameters a and b for the uniform distribution U(a,b). Use Minitab to find the minimum and maximum values of wait time.**

    **c) Write the probability density function f(x) for this uniform distribution, including the range of x values.**

    ****B2. Probability Calculations****

    **d) Calculate the mean and standard deviation for this uniform distribution using the Minitab.**

    **e) Using the uniform distribution properties, calculate:**

    **· P(Wait Time < 8 minutes)**

    **· P(Wait Time > 15 minutes)**

    **· P(5 < Wait Time < 12 minutes)**

    ****B3. Percentile Analysis****

    **f) Management wants to ensure that 90% of customers wait less than a certain time. What should this target time be?**

    ****B4. Conditional Probability****

    **g) A customer has already been waiting for 10 minutes. What is the probability they will wait more than 15 minutes total? Use the conditional probability approach for uniform distributions presented in the provided materials for this section as “the first way” approach.**

    ****Part C: Exponential Probability Distributions****

    ****Background****

    **Component failure times in stress testing follow an exponential distribution. This analysis is crucial for determining warranty periods and reliability standards.**

    ****C1. Distribution Verification and Parameters****

    **a) Using Minitab, create a histogram of the Failure Time variable. Does this appear to follow an exponential distribution? What characteristics support this conclusion?**

    **b) Calculate the sample mean of failure times using Minitab. For an exponential distribution, this sample mean estimates the parameter μ (mean time between failures).**

    **c) Calculate the decay parameter m = 1/μ for this exponential distribution.**

    ****C2. Reliability Analysis****

    **b) Using the exponential distribution properties, calculate:**

    **· P(Failure Time > 20 hours)**

    **· P(Failure Time < 10 hours)**

    **· P(15 < Failure Time < 30 hours)**

    **c) Find the median failure time (50th percentile) using Minitab's percentile function.**

    **d) Management wants to set a warranty period such that only 10% of components fail within the warranty period. What should this warranty period be?**

    ****C3. Memoryless Property****

    **e) A component has already been operating successfully for 20 hours. What is the probability it will operate for at least another 10 hours?**

    **MAT202YourPaceMilestone2Data.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat202yourpacemilestone2data-xlsx)

    **AnaCastroMATMilestone2.mpx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anacastromatmilestone2-mpx)

    **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone2.docx**

    ## MAT 202 Milestone 2

    **Application-Based Assessment: Continuous Probability Distributions Using Minitab**

    ****Scenario:** TechFlow Manufacturing produces high-precision electronic components for aerospace applications. As the new Quality Control Analyst, you've been tasked with analyzing three critical aspects of their production process to ensure products meet stringent aerospace standards.**

    ****Download the dataset: MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data** and import it into Minitab.**

    ****Submission:** Submit your Word document with all graphs, charts, and outputs and your .mpx Minitab file.**

    ****Dataset Description****

    ****File:** MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data**

    **The dataset contains 500 observations with the following variables:**

    **· ComponentID: Unique identifier for each component**

    **· ProcessingTime: Time (in minutes) required to machine each component**

    **· WaitTime: Time (in minutes) customers wait for technical support**

    **· FailureTime: Time (in hours) until component failure in stress testing**

    ****Part A: Continuous Probability Density Functions****

    ****Background****

    **You need to understand the fundamental properties of continuous probability distributions to properly analyze TechFlow's quality metrics.**

    ****A1. Theoretical Foundation****

    **Using the Processing Time data from your dataset:**

    **a) Import the ‘MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 2 Data’ file into Minitab and create a histogram of the Processing Time variable. Based on the shape of the distribution, identify what type of continuous distribution this appears to follow.**

    **b) Calculate the sample mean and standard deviation of the processing time using Minitab's descriptive statistics function.**

    **c) For any continuous probability distribution, explain why P(X = k) = 0 for any specific value k. Demonstrate this concept using your processing time data by calculating P(X = 30.0000) exactly.**

    ****Part B: Uniform Probability Distributions****

    ****Background****

    **TechFlow's customer service department has found that customer wait times follow a uniform distribution. You need to analyze this distribution to improve service efficiency.**

    ****B1. Distribution Identification and Parameters****

    **a) Using Minitab, create a histogram of the ‘Wait Time’ variable with appropriate bin settings. Verify that this data appears to follow a uniform distribution.**

    **b) From your sample data, estimate the parameters a and b for the uniform distribution U(a,b). Use Minitab to find the minimum and maximum values of wait time.**

    **c) Write the probability density function f(x) for this uniform distribution, including the range of x values.**

    ****B2. Probability Calculations****

    **d) Calculate the mean and standard deviation for this uniform distribution using the Minitab.**

    **e) Using the uniform distribution properties, calculate:**

    **· P(Wait Time < 8 minutes)**

    **· P(Wait Time > 15 minutes)**

    **· P(5 < Wait Time < 12 minutes)**

    ****B3. Percentile Analysis****

    **f) Management wants to ensure that 90% of customers wait less than a certain time. What should this target time be?**

    ****B4. Conditional Probability****

    **g) A customer has already been waiting for 10 minutes. What is the probability they will wait more than 15 minutes total? Use the conditional probability approach for uniform distributions presented in the provided materials for this section as “the first way” approach.**

    ****Part C: Exponential Probability Distributions****

    ****Background****

    **Component failure times in stress testing follow an exponential distribution. This analysis is crucial for determining warranty periods and reliability standards.**

    ****C1. Distribution Verification and Parameters****

    **a) Using Minitab, create a histogram of the Failure Time variable. Does this appear to follow an exponential distribution? What characteristics support this conclusion?**

    **b) Calculate the sample mean of failure times using Minitab. For an exponential distribution, this sample mean estimates the parameter μ (mean time between failures).**

    **c) Calculate the decay parameter m = 1/μ for this exponential distribution.**

    ****C2. Reliability Analysis****

    **b) Using the exponential distribution properties, calculate:**

    **· P(Failure Time > 20 hours)**

    **· P(Failure Time < 10 hours)**

    **· P(15 < Failure Time < 30 hours)**

    **c) Find the median failure time (50th percentile) using Minitab's percentile function.**

    **d) Management wants to set a warranty period such that only 10% of components fail within the warranty period. What should this warranty period be?**

    ****C3. Memoryless Property****

    **e) A component has already been operating successfully for 20 hours. What is the probability it will operate for at least another 10 hours?**

    **MAT202YourPaceMilestone2Data.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat202yourpacemilestone2data-xlsx)

    **AnaCastroMATMilestone2.mpx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/anacastromatmilestone2-mpx)

  • [Solved] Soap 2 Response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## SOAP2Response.docx **## SOAP2Response.docx** STUDENT’S SOAP NOTE : The required discussion response(s) to student or faculty for each weekly question(s) is (are) completed by Friday at 11:59 PM ET for each electronic week. These postings are on different days of the week than the …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## SOAP2Response.docx

    **## SOAP2Response.docx**

    STUDENT’S SOAP NOTE : The required discussion response(s) to student or faculty for each weekly question(s) is (are) completed by Friday at 11:59 PM ET for each electronic week. These postings are on different days of the week than the initial post(s). Minimum of 250 words.

    **Name of Patient:** NG

    **Date of Service:** 9/14/26

    **Session Type: Evaluation/** Intake VIA telehealth, 4:00 pm to 5:00pm

    **Duration** 60 mins

    **Chief Complaint**: “I have been having periods of inattention. I have a history of ADHD and I think I need medications”.

    **Subjective:**  Patient is a 37-year-old Caucasian male. He reports that he was diagnosed with ADHD when he was a child. He states that he was taking Adderall and Ritalin until he was 18 years old.  He thinks that he was on an additional medication but cannot recall the name. Patient reports he has not been on any medication since the age of 18.

    Patient reports that he is easily distracted it can be by noise, people talking or activity. He also states that when he is at work and home he forgets where he put things down and has a hard time finding them. NG states that when he is spoken to, he has difficulty comprehending what is being said to him. He reports that he delays or avoid tasks or projects that requires a lot of thought. He says that he does not have a sense of urgency to finish final projects if the work is challenging.

    NG reports that he interrupts others when they are busy. He reports that he cuts others off when they are talking and finishes their sentences. He says he finds it difficult to wait his turn to talk.  NG says it is hard for him to sit still and finds himself squirming and fidgeting with his feet or hands. He reports there are times when he is overly energetic and active. NG, provided an example: He says that he came back form a trip and instead of resting he felt the need to keep doing various things.

    NG states during work meetings he is able to stay in his seat if he is required to.  He states he has no difficulty in remembering appointments or obligations. NG reports no difficulties with organizational, boundaries and talking too much in social settings.

    NG reports no issues with sleeping but says he feels tired after his flight back from Australia. He reports that he does have anxiety and believes his blood pressure rises during these incidents. He reports a recent doctors visit but is unsure if his blood pressure was taken, He reports no issues with his appetite.  NG reports that he does not use tobacco products, but he does smoke marijuana using a vape pen. Patient states that he has not had any type of therapy but if advised he is open to having therapy. NG reports that he knows of no one that has a history of mental health history. Patient reports he is currently not on any medications and reports no allergies.

    **Medical History: None**

    **Psychiatric History:** ADHD as a child

    **Current medications:** None

    **Ritalin –** Prescribed during childhood stop taking it at the age of 18.

    **Adderall-** Prescribed during childhood stop taking it at the age of 18

    **Allergies:** None

    **Social History:**

    Patient is currently employed as a musician and goes on tour a lot. His job includes traveling and he just returned from Australia. Patient has difficulty maintain an exercise routine but says he does exercise occasionally. He denies drinking and tobacco products. He endorses smoking marijuana through a vape pen. Patient reports no history of mental illness in his family.

    **Review of Systems:** Positive for anxiety in certain situations and negative for appetite changes.

    **Objective:**

    Patient is a 37-year-old Caucasian male that looks age appropriate. Patient is well groomed and he is able to answer all questions appropriately and without prompts.

    Behavior: Patient is very cooperative and engaged throughout this session.

    Speech: Normal rate of speech and volume, extremely articulate

    Mood: Patient reports feeling good but has anxiety in certain situations

    Thought Process.: NG thought process is linear and rational. He can state his issues and able to stay on topic

    Thought Content; There are no suicidal, homicidal or self-injury ideations

    Cognition: Alert and oriented, no difficulties with short- and long-term memory

    Insight: Acknowledges present and prior symptoms of ADHD open to therapy and medication treatment

    Judgment: Appears to have good judgement, agreeing to take non-stimulant medications and to obtain psychiatric records.

    **Assessment and Screening**

    Self-Report

    GAD 7:5

    PHQ 9: 1

    **Diagnosis:**

    Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, unspecified type, F90.9 (ICD) (Active)

    Anxiety disorder unspecified F41.9 (ICD-10) (Active)

    **Differential Diagnosis**

    Cannabis Use — Cannabis use can affect several neurotransmitters in the brain, including dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. Chronic THC use may also affect the dopamine system and lead to problems with motivation and executive functioning. These effects can mimic or worsen some symptoms of ADHD, such as difficulty with attention, concentration, and motivation. Cannabis use can also make it more difficult for providers to determine whether ADHD medications are improving symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity (Barbuti et al., 2023).

    **Plan:** CW will start taking atomoxetine 25mg by mouth 1 tablet daily dosage is prescribed low to allow gradual titration based on clinical response and tolerability. Atomoxetine is a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults. It works by blocking the reuptake of norepinephrine in the brain, which increases the amount of norepinephrine available. Atomoxetine can also affect dopamine levels in certain areas of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, which plays an important role in attention and concentration (Fu et al., 2021). Patient was educated on possible side effects of atomoxetine which can include nausea, decrease in appetite, increase in blood.  pressure, increase in heart rate and fatigue. Patient advised to take this medication with food or a snack. Patient advised to purchase a blood pressure cuff and take his blood pressure daily. Patient agreed to obtain prior psychiatric records from childhood. Patient recommend to practice mindful techniques to help with impulsive reactions and inattention. Mindfulness is a practice that involves focusing a person’s attention on what is happening in the present moment while approaching their thoughts and experiences with an open mind, curiosity, and acceptance (Mitchell et al., 2015). Recommendations to break larger task in to several simple task.  Patient also advise to cease using marijuana while taking stimulant therapy. Cannabis use disorder is commonly seen in individuals with mental health disorders, especially those diagnosed with ADHD. According to Barbuti et al. (2023), ADHD was diagnosed in approximately one-third of adolescents who experienced cannabis use disorder, cannabis abuse, or problematic cannabis use. Patient was also educated on using cannabis because it may increase anxiety or cause possible cardiac issues.  A therapy referral was discussed and patient is open to therapy. Patient to return in 1 week.

    Bobbie Gilbert RN

                                                                                 References

    Barbuti, M., Maiello, M., Spera, V., Pallucchini, A., Brancati, G. E., Maremmani, A. G. I., Perugi, G., & Maremmani, I. (2023). Challenges of treating ADHD with comorbid substance use disorder: Considerations for the clinician.
    _Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12_(9), Article 3096.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093096](https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093096?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Fu, D., Wu, D.-D., Guo, H.-L., Hu, Y.-H., Xia, Y., Ji, X., Fang, W.-R., Li, Y.-M., Xu, J., Chen, F., & Liu, Q.-Q. (2021). The mechanism, clinical efficacy, safety, and dosage regimen of atomoxetine for ADHD therapy in children: A narrative review.
    _Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12_, Article 780921.
    [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780921](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780921?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Mitchell, J. T., Zylowska, L., & Kollins, S. H. (2015). Mindfulness meditation training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adulthood: Current empirical support, treatment overview, and future directions.
    _Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22_(2), 172–191.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.10.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.10.002?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    **## SOAP2Response.docx**

    STUDENT’S SOAP NOTE : The required discussion response(s) to student or faculty for each weekly question(s) is (are) completed by Friday at 11:59 PM ET for each electronic week. These postings are on different days of the week than the initial post(s). Minimum of 250 words.

    **Name of Patient:** NG

    **Date of Service:** 9/14/26

    **Session Type: Evaluation/** Intake VIA telehealth, 4:00 pm to 5:00pm

    **Duration** 60 mins

    **Chief Complaint**: “I have been having periods of inattention. I have a history of ADHD and I think I need medications”.

    **Subjective:**  Patient is a 37-year-old Caucasian male. He reports that he was diagnosed with ADHD when he was a child. He states that he was taking Adderall and Ritalin until he was 18 years old.  He thinks that he was on an additional medication but cannot recall the name. Patient reports he has not been on any medication since the age of 18.

    Patient reports that he is easily distracted it can be by noise, people talking or activity. He also states that when he is at work and home he forgets where he put things down and has a hard time finding them. NG states that when he is spoken to, he has difficulty comprehending what is being said to him. He reports that he delays or avoid tasks or projects that requires a lot of thought. He says that he does not have a sense of urgency to finish final projects if the work is challenging.

    NG reports that he interrupts others when they are busy. He reports that he cuts others off when they are talking and finishes their sentences. He says he finds it difficult to wait his turn to talk.  NG says it is hard for him to sit still and finds himself squirming and fidgeting with his feet or hands. He reports there are times when he is overly energetic and active. NG, provided an example: He says that he came back form a trip and instead of resting he felt the need to keep doing various things.

    NG states during work meetings he is able to stay in his seat if he is required to.  He states he has no difficulty in remembering appointments or obligations. NG reports no difficulties with organizational, boundaries and talking too much in social settings.

    NG reports no issues with sleeping but says he feels tired after his flight back from Australia. He reports that he does have anxiety and believes his blood pressure rises during these incidents. He reports a recent doctors visit but is unsure if his blood pressure was taken, He reports no issues with his appetite.  NG reports that he does not use tobacco products, but he does smoke marijuana using a vape pen. Patient states that he has not had any type of therapy but if advised he is open to having therapy. NG reports that he knows of no one that has a history of mental health history. Patient reports he is currently not on any medications and reports no allergies.

    **Medical History: None**

    **Psychiatric History:** ADHD as a child

    **Current medications:** None

    **Ritalin –** Prescribed during childhood stop taking it at the age of 18.

    **Adderall-** Prescribed during childhood stop taking it at the age of 18

    **Allergies:** None

    **Social History:**

    Patient is currently employed as a musician and goes on tour a lot. His job includes traveling and he just returned from Australia. Patient has difficulty maintain an exercise routine but says he does exercise occasionally. He denies drinking and tobacco products. He endorses smoking marijuana through a vape pen. Patient reports no history of mental illness in his family.

    **Review of Systems:** Positive for anxiety in certain situations and negative for appetite changes.

    **Objective:**

    Patient is a 37-year-old Caucasian male that looks age appropriate. Patient is well groomed and he is able to answer all questions appropriately and without prompts.

    Behavior: Patient is very cooperative and engaged throughout this session.

    Speech: Normal rate of speech and volume, extremely articulate

    Mood: Patient reports feeling good but has anxiety in certain situations

    Thought Process.: NG thought process is linear and rational. He can state his issues and able to stay on topic

    Thought Content; There are no suicidal, homicidal or self-injury ideations

    Cognition: Alert and oriented, no difficulties with short- and long-term memory

    Insight: Acknowledges present and prior symptoms of ADHD open to therapy and medication treatment

    Judgment: Appears to have good judgement, agreeing to take non-stimulant medications and to obtain psychiatric records.

    **Assessment and Screening**

    Self-Report

    GAD 7:5

    PHQ 9: 1

    **Diagnosis:**

    Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, unspecified type, F90.9 (ICD) (Active)

    Anxiety disorder unspecified F41.9 (ICD-10) (Active)

    **Differential Diagnosis**

    Cannabis Use — Cannabis use can affect several neurotransmitters in the brain, including dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. Chronic THC use may also affect the dopamine system and lead to problems with motivation and executive functioning. These effects can mimic or worsen some symptoms of ADHD, such as difficulty with attention, concentration, and motivation. Cannabis use can also make it more difficult for providers to determine whether ADHD medications are improving symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity (Barbuti et al., 2023).

    **Plan:** CW will start taking atomoxetine 25mg by mouth 1 tablet daily dosage is prescribed low to allow gradual titration based on clinical response and tolerability. Atomoxetine is a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults. It works by blocking the reuptake of norepinephrine in the brain, which increases the amount of norepinephrine available. Atomoxetine can also affect dopamine levels in certain areas of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, which plays an important role in attention and concentration (Fu et al., 2021). Patient was educated on possible side effects of atomoxetine which can include nausea, decrease in appetite, increase in blood.  pressure, increase in heart rate and fatigue. Patient advised to take this medication with food or a snack. Patient advised to purchase a blood pressure cuff and take his blood pressure daily. Patient agreed to obtain prior psychiatric records from childhood. Patient recommend to practice mindful techniques to help with impulsive reactions and inattention. Mindfulness is a practice that involves focusing a person’s attention on what is happening in the present moment while approaching their thoughts and experiences with an open mind, curiosity, and acceptance (Mitchell et al., 2015). Recommendations to break larger task in to several simple task.  Patient also advise to cease using marijuana while taking stimulant therapy. Cannabis use disorder is commonly seen in individuals with mental health disorders, especially those diagnosed with ADHD. According to Barbuti et al. (2023), ADHD was diagnosed in approximately one-third of adolescents who experienced cannabis use disorder, cannabis abuse, or problematic cannabis use. Patient was also educated on using cannabis because it may increase anxiety or cause possible cardiac issues.  A therapy referral was discussed and patient is open to therapy. Patient to return in 1 week.

    Bobbie Gilbert RN

                                                                                 References

    Barbuti, M., Maiello, M., Spera, V., Pallucchini, A., Brancati, G. E., Maremmani, A. G. I., Perugi, G., & Maremmani, I. (2023). Challenges of treating ADHD with comorbid substance use disorder: Considerations for the clinician.
    _Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12_(9), Article 3096.
    [https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093096](https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093096?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Fu, D., Wu, D.-D., Guo, H.-L., Hu, Y.-H., Xia, Y., Ji, X., Fang, W.-R., Li, Y.-M., Xu, J., Chen, F., & Liu, Q.-Q. (2021). The mechanism, clinical efficacy, safety, and dosage regimen of atomoxetine for ADHD therapy in children: A narrative review.
    _Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12_, Article 780921.
    [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780921](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780921?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Mitchell, J. T., Zylowska, L., & Kollins, S. H. (2015). Mindfulness meditation training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adulthood: Current empirical support, treatment overview, and future directions.
    _Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22_(2), 172–191.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.10.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.10.002?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

  • [Solved] A7 CT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Read and follow the attachments **files (8)** – ## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx – ## TraumatologyPaperGradingRubric.pdf – ## TraumatologyPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx – PriorUnit3-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx – PriorUnit5-NeedCorrections-AnalysisintheStudy…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Read and follow the attachments

    **files (8)**

    – ## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx

    – ## TraumatologyPaperGradingRubric.pdf

    – ## TraumatologyPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – PriorUnit3-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx
    – PriorUnit5-NeedCorrections-AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartTwoAssignment.docx
    – Reading-Chapt.28-30LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf
    – PriorUnit4-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx
    – ReadingChapt.11-15BriereLJJ.L0ScottLJC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf

    **## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Assignments Overview**

    Throughout EDCO 790, you will conduct a study across the eight weeks of the term on a specific topic and population of interest in traumatology. The purpose of this study is twofold.

    · Help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    ·
    Deepen the learner’s foundational understanding of trauma counseling

    A series of five assignments are integrated across the course modules and weeks, using the scaffolding strategy to give the learner support as new concepts and skills as required for the dissertation. The assignments in this series include:
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation,** and
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    Beginning with the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**, each study assignment will have five core sections: Discussion of the Topic of Study, Population of Interest, Associated Variables, Biblical Integration, and Topics for Future Research.
    **Note that all written assignments in the study should be submitted in a Word (versus PDF) document with Times New Roman 12-point font, as this is recommended by APA.**

    **Module 1: Week 1 – Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**

    · This is the foundation of the study, much as the first stage of building a house is to set the foundation.

    · The learner will review The Liberty Way regarding ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the document,
    _Thesis Statements – Defining, Developing, and Evaluating_ (Liberty University Academic Success Center.

    · The learner will identify a specific topic and a specifically focused population for that topic with their study in traumatology

    · The learner will explore the topic and population further through use of AI to more specifically narrowthiese.

    · The learner will conclude this assignment with a paper stating the topic and population for the study as well as a thesis which synthesizes the topic, population, and the main idea and primary conclusion that will capture the reader’s attention.

    **Module 3: Week 3 – Traumatology Outline Assignment**

    · The outline will include initial references that support the main points of the outline, with some initial development of topics throughout each of the 5 main sections of the outline.

    · The learner will review the webpage covering the APA Research Paper Outline format (provided on the assignment page) to present an outline for the introduction, five sections of the study, and conclusion.

    **Module 5: Week 5 – Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment**

    · The annotated outline is a structured plan for a research paper that builds on the outline of the main sections and sub-sections with brief annotations that describe the purpose, content and references of each part.

    · The learner will review the document for
    _Guidance and Example Annotated Outline_ for understanding and an example to follow.

    · The learner will expand on the outline with annotations for at least 3 points with support from peer-reviewed scholarly articles.

    **Module 6: Week 6 – Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**

    · The presentation provides an opportunity for scholarly presentation on a topic of interest as a required skill for doctoral learners that is used in the dissertation proposal and dissertation final defense.

    · The learner will present their study in a narrated presentation that is developed for a professional audience of emerging experts in the field of traumatology.

    **Module 7: Week 7 – Traumatology Paper Assignment**

    · The paper is the culminating assignment for the study conducted during the EDCO 790 course.

    · The learner will integrate what has been developed through the previous study assignments and feedback from the professor on these to write the final paper.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 15 to >12 pts

    Advanced

    A Professional APA style
    abstract is present with
    excellent content and
    formatting.

    12 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    A Professional
    APA style abstract
    is present. May
    have minor
    content or
    formatting errors.

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    An abstract is
    present. Content
    or formatting
    errors are present
    in several areas.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    An abstract may
    be used but may
    not have APA
    formatting or may
    be missing some
    content.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 15
    pts

    Content 95 to >76 pts

    Advanced

    Assertions are relevant to
    the topic as well as the
    population of interest. All
    information is presented
    with the analysis and
    synthesis of extensive,
    relevant research from
    course texts as well as
    outside sources.
    Considerations for the
    population of interest are
    included throughout. All
    required elements are
    discussed. Topics are
    designed for an APA,
    scholarly audience of
    emerging experts in the
    field of traumatology.
    Topics are discussed
    without the use of direct
    quotes.

    76 to >51 pts

    Proficient

    Assertions are
    mostly relevant to
    the topic and to
    the population of
    interest.
    Information
    presented
    includes relevant
    research.
    Required
    elements are
    included and
    mostly designed
    for emerging
    experts in the field
    of traumatology.
    Direct quotes are
    used only
    sparingly, if at all.

    51 to >35 pts

    Developing

    Assertions may
    have relevance to
    the topic or to the
    population of
    interest but may
    lack a cogent tie
    between them, or
    the topic may not
    be focused.
    Information may
    include research
    and may be
    designed for
    emerging experts
    in the field of
    traumatology.
    There may be the
    use of direct
    quotes.

    35 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Assertions may be
    inconsistent, or
    there may be no
    population of
    interest.
    Information may
    not be appropriate
    for emerging
    experts in the field
    of traumatology or
    not designed for a
    scholarly
    audience. Direct
    quotes may have
    been present
    throughout.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 95
    pts

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 40 to >32 pts

    Advanced

    Biblical application
    (verses/ passages) is
    clearly integrated into text
    along with the use of
    Christian counseling or
    biblical scholarship. Faith
    based topics are
    discussed in a scholarly
    way with relevance
    clarified to an APA
    scholarly audience.

    32 to >22.5 pts

    Proficient

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is integrated into
    text. The use of
    Christian
    counseling or
    biblical
    scholarship
    references may
    be relevant or
    present.
    Relevance of the
    topics may be
    clarified and
    written to an APA
    scholarly
    audience.

    22.5 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is present and
    may include
    references but is
    not properly
    integrated.

    15 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is marginally
    present but no to
    low use of
    references or
    scholary
    integration is
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 40
    pts

    Structure 25 to >20 pts

    Advanced

    The assignment contains
    no spelling and grammar
    errors. Excelllent
    Professional APA style
    formatting is accurately
    applied throughout.
    Transitions and Headings
    are used to add to
    organizational clarity.
    Scholarly voice is used
    consistently throughout
    the presentation. The
    body of the paper was 12
    to 15 pages in length.

    20 to >15 pts

    Proficient

    The assignment
    contains only
    minor spelling and
    grammar errors.
    APA style
    formatting is
    present.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used to add to
    organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used in
    the submission.
    The body of the
    paper was 12 to
    15 pages in
    length.

    15 to >10 pts

    Developing

    The assignment
    contains spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present but may
    have mistakes.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used but may
    have errors.
    Scholarly voice
    may not be used
    consistently. The
    paper may be
    over 15 pages or
    under 12 pages in
    length.

    10 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Spelling and
    grammar errors
    may be present in
    several areas of
    the submission.
    APA formatting
    may be present
    but may have
    mistakes or may
    be inconsistent.
    Transitions and
    Headings may not
    be used. Scholarly
    voice may not be
    used. The body of
    the paper may not
    have met length
    requirements.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 25
    pts

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Structure 25 to >20 pts

    Advanced

    Meets or exceeds the
    required number of
    scholarly journal articles
    (15) in the body of the
    paper and in the
    references section. These
    sources were in addition
    to other, quality sources
    from the course texts
    utilized in the paper.
    Professional APA
    formatting is accurate in
    the sources.

    20 to >15 pts

    Proficient

    Meets the
    required number
    of scholarly
    journal articles in
    the body of the
    paper and in the
    references
    section. Some
    minor APA style
    errors may be
    noted in the
    sources.

    15 to >10 pts

    Developing

    May not meet the
    required number
    of sources in the
    body of the paper
    or in the
    references
    section. Some
    sources may not
    be scholarly. APA
    errors may be
    noted in the
    sources.

    10 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Does not meet the
    required number
    of sources or
    sources do not
    meet
    requirements. APA
    issues are noted
    in the sources.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 25
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    **## TraumatologyPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Paper Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This Professional APA style
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment** requires a specific focus on a narrow portion of the knowledge gained from this course. This paper builds upon the knowledge gained in the course and is the culmination of the series of assignments that began with
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**, and finally, this assignment, the
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings in more than one modality.

    In this final assignment, the student will summarize the learning from this course and from outside sources to discuss one in-depth topic in traumatology. By this point in the course, the topic should be sufficiently narrowed in both scope and population to one, specific aspect of traumatology. Learners may find that they wish to continue to narrow their topic significantly from the
    **Traumatology Outline Assignment** and
    **Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation** and may do so along with the feedback from the Instructor throughout the course. Since doctoral students are frequently required to write on the same topic, including during the dissertation phase of the program, it is required that information in this paper must demonstrate a deepening view of the scholarship utilized throughout the course.
    **Note**: As this is the culmination of the series of course assignments, it is expected that this paper will show further depth of scholarly discourse as built from insight with all of the assignments.
    **It is expected that the paper will show continuation of points made and references used for these previous assignments – the paper will exhibit further depth**. This will be considered in examination of the learner’s Turnitin report for the paper. Problem matches on Turnitin would be matches with course work outside what the learner has been building through the course.

    Topics should be narrowed to a specific population of interest or compared and contrasted among populations to indicate specific recognition of risk and resilience factors that may play a role in the presentation or treatment of the trauma. The paper should include a scholarly approach to the topic and the following sections: Topic, Population of Interest, Variables Associated with the Topic, and Topics for Future Research.

    **Instructions** Include the following components in your
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**:

    · The paper must include the following:

    ·
    **Professional APA style Title Page**

    ·
    **Professional APA style Abstract**

    ·
    **Professional APA style Heading and Organizations**.

    · Professional APA style summary introduction, headings, subheadings, transitions, and conclusion.

    ·
    **Discussion of the Topic of Study**

    · Introduction to the topic and information of what the current research states regarding what is currently known about the topic.
    **Note:** this paper’s audience is a scholarly audience of emerging traumatology experts. Do not include sections of information that should be well-known to this audience.

    ·
    **Population of Interest**

    · A specific population of interest and the relevance of studying this population must be discussed.

    · Information regarding risk factors, population data (including country or countries of interest), base rate or incidence rate of the topic within the population, and other pertinent information that offers a clear view of topic related to the population of interest for the paper.

    · Information regarding the relevance of studying the population could include rationales such as: poor representation of the population of interest in the literature, a personal interest in the population (i.e., ministry or vocation), local community concern, vulnerability issues, etc.

    · The section could also note current research on the topic with the population of interest or a similar population or scholarly sources that state there is no research on the topic, further supporting the need for the topic to be studied with the population of interest.

    ·
    **Variables Associated with the Topic**

    · This section should include an expansion of the topic that is specific to the population of interest and the factors that affect how this topic in traumatology is experienced by the population indicated.

    · Information in this section could include elements such as relevant symptoms, short- and long-term effects associated with the topic, frequently occurring comorbidities, and an overview of recommended treatment methodologies for the type of trauma selected for the focus of this paper.
    **Note: the population of interest must be discussed throughout.**

    ·
    **Biblical Integration**

    · This section must present a scholarly discussion of biblical integration, Christian counseling, Christian accommodative practices, Chaplain work, pastoral counseling, or other published topics related to the topic and population of interest.

    · Bible verses and Christian or faith-based topics can be discussed along with appropriate scholarship (commentaries, theology references, etc.).
    **Note:** the audience for this paper is a Professional APA, scholarly reader, not necessarily a Christian audience. Please use scholarship that supports the use of biblical integration with appropriate populations.

    ·
    **Topics for Future Research**

    · This section should include information on what research has found as gaps in the literature and what should continue to be the focus for future researchers.

    · The learner may extrapolate from research in this section, particularly if there is a rationale of underlying scholarship.

    · For instance, if the learner’s topic and population of interest is regarding evidence based treatment for Asian American women who have endured military sexual assault (MSA), but the literature does not offer a scholarly basis for future researchers on this specific topic and population, the learner could extrapolate an argument for this from previous literature on MSA in the female population, in general, making the specific notation regarding how the rationale was derived clear to the audience.

    **Additional Information**

    **Other Requirements**

    · The topic and population of interest discussion should be addressed toward a scholarly audience of emerging traumatology experts throughout the paper. Slang, non-professional language, contractions, references to the editorial “we”, pop-psychology jargon, and other references or discussions that are not scholarly should be omitted.

    · The body of the
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment** should be between 12 and 15 pages (not including title page, abstract, and references).

    · Use current Professional APA formatting, organization, voice, and structure throughout.

    · Please use only Times New Roman 12 point font throughout.

    · There must be a minimum of 15 scholarly journals that have been published in the last 3 years used in the references.

    · Texts from this course may be used as sources; they will be in addition
    to the other required sources.

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric** before beginning this
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **PriorUnit3-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit3-needcorrectionsassignment-traumatologyannotatedoutline-docx-10607779)

    **PriorUnit5-NeedCorrections-AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartTwoAssignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit5-needcorrections-analysisinthestudyoftraumaparttwoassignment-docx)

    **Reading-Chapt.28-30LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-chapt-28-30leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **PriorUnit4-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit4-needcorrectionsassignment-traumatologyannotatedoutline-docx-10607783)

    **ReadingChapt.11-15BriereLJJ.L0ScottLJC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-11-15briereljj-l0scottljc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

    **ReadingChapt.11-15BriereLJJ.L0ScottLJC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-11-15briereljj-l0scottljc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

    **## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Assignments Overview**

    Throughout EDCO 790, you will conduct a study across the eight weeks of the term on a specific topic and population of interest in traumatology. The purpose of this study is twofold.

    · Help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    ·
    Deepen the learner’s foundational understanding of trauma counseling

    A series of five assignments are integrated across the course modules and weeks, using the scaffolding strategy to give the learner support as new concepts and skills as required for the dissertation. The assignments in this series include:
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation,** and
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    Beginning with the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**, each study assignment will have five core sections: Discussion of the Topic of Study, Population of Interest, Associated Variables, Biblical Integration, and Topics for Future Research.
    **Note that all written assignments in the study should be submitted in a Word (versus PDF) document with Times New Roman 12-point font, as this is recommended by APA.**

    **Module 1: Week 1 – Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**

    · This is the foundation of the study, much as the first stage of building a house is to set the foundation.

    · The learner will review The Liberty Way regarding ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the document,
    _Thesis Statements – Defining, Developing, and Evaluating_ (Liberty University Academic Success Center.

    · The learner will identify a specific topic and a specifically focused population for that topic with their study in traumatology

    · The learner will explore the topic and population further through use of AI to more specifically narrowthiese.

    · The learner will conclude this assignment with a paper stating the topic and population for the study as well as a thesis which synthesizes the topic, population, and the main idea and primary conclusion that will capture the reader’s attention.

    **Module 3: Week 3 – Traumatology Outline Assignment**

    · The outline will include initial references that support the main points of the outline, with some initial development of topics throughout each of the 5 main sections of the outline.

    · The learner will review the webpage covering the APA Research Paper Outline format (provided on the assignment page) to present an outline for the introduction, five sections of the study, and conclusion.

    **Module 5: Week 5 – Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment**

    · The annotated outline is a structured plan for a research paper that builds on the outline of the main sections and sub-sections with brief annotations that describe the purpose, content and references of each part.

    · The learner will review the document for
    _Guidance and Example Annotated Outline_ for understanding and an example to follow.

    · The learner will expand on the outline with annotations for at least 3 points with support from peer-reviewed scholarly articles.

    **Module 6: Week 6 – Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**

    · The presentation provides an opportunity for scholarly presentation on a topic of interest as a required skill for doctoral learners that is used in the dissertation proposal and dissertation final defense.

    · The learner will present their study in a narrated presentation that is developed for a professional audience of emerging experts in the field of traumatology.

    **Module 7: Week 7 – Traumatology Paper Assignment**

    · The paper is the culminating assignment for the study conducted during the EDCO 790 course.

    · The learner will integrate what has been developed through the previous study assignments and feedback from the professor on these to write the final paper.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 15 to >12 pts

    Advanced

    A Professional APA style
    abstract is present with
    excellent content and
    formatting.

    12 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    A Professional
    APA style abstract
    is present. May
    have minor
    content or
    formatting errors.

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    An abstract is
    present. Content
    or formatting
    errors are present
    in several areas.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    An abstract may
    be used but may
    not have APA
    formatting or may
    be missing some
    content.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 15
    pts

    Content 95 to >76 pts

    Advanced

    Assertions are relevant to
    the topic as well as the
    population of interest. All
    information is presented
    with the analysis and
    synthesis of extensive,
    relevant research from
    course texts as well as
    outside sources.
    Considerations for the
    population of interest are
    included throughout. All
    required elements are
    discussed. Topics are
    designed for an APA,
    scholarly audience of
    emerging experts in the
    field of traumatology.
    Topics are discussed
    without the use of direct
    quotes.

    76 to >51 pts

    Proficient

    Assertions are
    mostly relevant to
    the topic and to
    the population of
    interest.
    Information
    presented
    includes relevant
    research.
    Required
    elements are
    included and
    mostly designed
    for emerging
    experts in the field
    of traumatology.
    Direct quotes are
    used only
    sparingly, if at all.

    51 to >35 pts

    Developing

    Assertions may
    have relevance to
    the topic or to the
    population of
    interest but may
    lack a cogent tie
    between them, or
    the topic may not
    be focused.
    Information may
    include research
    and may be
    designed for
    emerging experts
    in the field of
    traumatology.
    There may be the
    use of direct
    quotes.

    35 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Assertions may be
    inconsistent, or
    there may be no
    population of
    interest.
    Information may
    not be appropriate
    for emerging
    experts in the field
    of traumatology or
    not designed for a
    scholarly
    audience. Direct
    quotes may have
    been present
    throughout.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 95
    pts

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 40 to >32 pts

    Advanced

    Biblical application
    (verses/ passages) is
    clearly integrated into text
    along with the use of
    Christian counseling or
    biblical scholarship. Faith
    based topics are
    discussed in a scholarly
    way with relevance
    clarified to an APA
    scholarly audience.

    32 to >22.5 pts

    Proficient

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is integrated into
    text. The use of
    Christian
    counseling or
    biblical
    scholarship
    references may
    be relevant or
    present.
    Relevance of the
    topics may be
    clarified and
    written to an APA
    scholarly
    audience.

    22.5 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is present and
    may include
    references but is
    not properly
    integrated.

    15 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is marginally
    present but no to
    low use of
    references or
    scholary
    integration is
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 40
    pts

    Structure 25 to >20 pts

    Advanced

    The assignment contains
    no spelling and grammar
    errors. Excelllent
    Professional APA style
    formatting is accurately
    applied throughout.
    Transitions and Headings
    are used to add to
    organizational clarity.
    Scholarly voice is used
    consistently throughout
    the presentation. The
    body of the paper was 12
    to 15 pages in length.

    20 to >15 pts

    Proficient

    The assignment
    contains only
    minor spelling and
    grammar errors.
    APA style
    formatting is
    present.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used to add to
    organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used in
    the submission.
    The body of the
    paper was 12 to
    15 pages in
    length.

    15 to >10 pts

    Developing

    The assignment
    contains spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present but may
    have mistakes.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used but may
    have errors.
    Scholarly voice
    may not be used
    consistently. The
    paper may be
    over 15 pages or
    under 12 pages in
    length.

    10 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Spelling and
    grammar errors
    may be present in
    several areas of
    the submission.
    APA formatting
    may be present
    but may have
    mistakes or may
    be inconsistent.
    Transitions and
    Headings may not
    be used. Scholarly
    voice may not be
    used. The body of
    the paper may not
    have met length
    requirements.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 25
    pts

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Structure 25 to >20 pts

    Advanced

    Meets or exceeds the
    required number of
    scholarly journal articles
    (15) in the body of the
    paper and in the
    references section. These
    sources were in addition
    to other, quality sources
    from the course texts
    utilized in the paper.
    Professional APA
    formatting is accurate in
    the sources.

    20 to >15 pts

    Proficient

    Meets the
    required number
    of scholarly
    journal articles in
    the body of the
    paper and in the
    references
    section. Some
    minor APA style
    errors may be
    noted in the
    sources.

    15 to >10 pts

    Developing

    May not meet the
    required number
    of sources in the
    body of the paper
    or in the
    references
    section. Some
    sources may not
    be scholarly. APA
    errors may be
    noted in the
    sources.

    10 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Does not meet the
    required number
    of sources or
    sources do not
    meet
    requirements. APA
    issues are noted
    in the sources.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 25
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    **## TraumatologyPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Paper Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This Professional APA style
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment** requires a specific focus on a narrow portion of the knowledge gained from this course. This paper builds upon the knowledge gained in the course and is the culmination of the series of assignments that began with
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**, and finally, this assignment, the
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings in more than one modality.

    In this final assignment, the student will summarize the learning from this course and from outside sources to discuss one in-depth topic in traumatology. By this point in the course, the topic should be sufficiently narrowed in both scope and population to one, specific aspect of traumatology. Learners may find that they wish to continue to narrow their topic significantly from the
    **Traumatology Outline Assignment** and
    **Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation** and may do so along with the feedback from the Instructor throughout the course. Since doctoral students are frequently required to write on the same topic, including during the dissertation phase of the program, it is required that information in this paper must demonstrate a deepening view of the scholarship utilized throughout the course.
    **Note**: As this is the culmination of the series of course assignments, it is expected that this paper will show further depth of scholarly discourse as built from insight with all of the assignments.
    **It is expected that the paper will show continuation of points made and references used for these previous assignments – the paper will exhibit further depth**. This will be considered in examination of the learner’s Turnitin report for the paper. Problem matches on Turnitin would be matches with course work outside what the learner has been building through the course.

    Topics should be narrowed to a specific population of interest or compared and contrasted among populations to indicate specific recognition of risk and resilience factors that may play a role in the presentation or treatment of the trauma. The paper should include a scholarly approach to the topic and the following sections: Topic, Population of Interest, Variables Associated with the Topic, and Topics for Future Research.

    **Instructions** Include the following components in your
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**:

    · The paper must include the following:

    ·
    **Professional APA style Title Page**

    ·
    **Professional APA style Abstract**

    ·
    **Professional APA style Heading and Organizations**.

    · Professional APA style summary introduction, headings, subheadings, transitions, and conclusion.

    ·
    **Discussion of the Topic of Study**

    · Introduction to the topic and information of what the current research states regarding what is currently known about the topic.
    **Note:** this paper’s audience is a scholarly audience of emerging traumatology experts. Do not include sections of information that should be well-known to this audience.

    ·
    **Population of Interest**

    · A specific population of interest and the relevance of studying this population must be discussed.

    · Information regarding risk factors, population data (including country or countries of interest), base rate or incidence rate of the topic within the population, and other pertinent information that offers a clear view of topic related to the population of interest for the paper.

    · Information regarding the relevance of studying the population could include rationales such as: poor representation of the population of interest in the literature, a personal interest in the population (i.e., ministry or vocation), local community concern, vulnerability issues, etc.

    · The section could also note current research on the topic with the population of interest or a similar population or scholarly sources that state there is no research on the topic, further supporting the need for the topic to be studied with the population of interest.

    ·
    **Variables Associated with the Topic**

    · This section should include an expansion of the topic that is specific to the population of interest and the factors that affect how this topic in traumatology is experienced by the population indicated.

    · Information in this section could include elements such as relevant symptoms, short- and long-term effects associated with the topic, frequently occurring comorbidities, and an overview of recommended treatment methodologies for the type of trauma selected for the focus of this paper.
    **Note: the population of interest must be discussed throughout.**

    ·
    **Biblical Integration**

    · This section must present a scholarly discussion of biblical integration, Christian counseling, Christian accommodative practices, Chaplain work, pastoral counseling, or other published topics related to the topic and population of interest.

    · Bible verses and Christian or faith-based topics can be discussed along with appropriate scholarship (commentaries, theology references, etc.).
    **Note:** the audience for this paper is a Professional APA, scholarly reader, not necessarily a Christian audience. Please use scholarship that supports the use of biblical integration with appropriate populations.

    ·
    **Topics for Future Research**

    · This section should include information on what research has found as gaps in the literature and what should continue to be the focus for future researchers.

    · The learner may extrapolate from research in this section, particularly if there is a rationale of underlying scholarship.

    · For instance, if the learner’s topic and population of interest is regarding evidence based treatment for Asian American women who have endured military sexual assault (MSA), but the literature does not offer a scholarly basis for future researchers on this specific topic and population, the learner could extrapolate an argument for this from previous literature on MSA in the female population, in general, making the specific notation regarding how the rationale was derived clear to the audience.

    **Additional Information**

    **Other Requirements**

    · The topic and population of interest discussion should be addressed toward a scholarly audience of emerging traumatology experts throughout the paper. Slang, non-professional language, contractions, references to the editorial “we”, pop-psychology jargon, and other references or discussions that are not scholarly should be omitted.

    · The body of the
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment** should be between 12 and 15 pages (not including title page, abstract, and references).

    · Use current Professional APA formatting, organization, voice, and structure throughout.

    · Please use only Times New Roman 12 point font throughout.

    · There must be a minimum of 15 scholarly journals that have been published in the last 3 years used in the references.

    · Texts from this course may be used as sources; they will be in addition
    to the other required sources.

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric** before beginning this
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **PriorUnit3-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit3-needcorrectionsassignment-traumatologyannotatedoutline-docx-10607779)

    **PriorUnit5-NeedCorrections-AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartTwoAssignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit5-needcorrections-analysisinthestudyoftraumaparttwoassignment-docx)

    **Reading-Chapt.28-30LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-chapt-28-30leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **PriorUnit4-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit4-needcorrectionsassignment-traumatologyannotatedoutline-docx-10607783)

    **ReadingChapt.11-15BriereLJJ.L0ScottLJC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-11-15briereljj-l0scottljc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

    **## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Assignments Overview**

    Throughout EDCO 790, you will conduct a study across the eight weeks of the term on a specific topic and population of interest in traumatology. The purpose of this study is twofold.

    · Help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    ·
    Deepen the learner’s foundational understanding of trauma counseling

    A series of five assignments are integrated across the course modules and weeks, using the scaffolding strategy to give the learner support as new concepts and skills as required for the dissertation. The assignments in this series include:
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation,** and
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    Beginning with the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**, each study assignment will have five core sections: Discussion of the Topic of Study, Population of Interest, Associated Variables, Biblical Integration, and Topics for Future Research.
    **Note that all written assignments in the study should be submitted in a Word (versus PDF) document with Times New Roman 12-point font, as this is recommended by APA.**

    **Module 1: Week 1 – Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**

    · This is the foundation of the study, much as the first stage of building a house is to set the foundation.

    · The learner will review The Liberty Way regarding ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the document,
    _Thesis Statements – Defining, Developing, and Evaluating_ (Liberty University Academic Success Center.

    · The learner will identify a specific topic and a specifically focused population for that topic with their study in traumatology

    · The learner will explore the topic and population further through use of AI to more specifically narrowthiese.

    · The learner will conclude this assignment with a paper stating the topic and population for the study as well as a thesis which synthesizes the topic, population, and the main idea and primary conclusion that will capture the reader’s attention.

    **Module 3: Week 3 – Traumatology Outline Assignment**

    · The outline will include initial references that support the main points of the outline, with some initial development of topics throughout each of the 5 main sections of the outline.

    · The learner will review the webpage covering the APA Research Paper Outline format (provided on the assignment page) to present an outline for the introduction, five sections of the study, and conclusion.

    **Module 5: Week 5 – Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment**

    · The annotated outline is a structured plan for a research paper that builds on the outline of the main sections and sub-sections with brief annotations that describe the purpose, content and references of each part.

    · The learner will review the document for
    _Guidance and Example Annotated Outline_ for understanding and an example to follow.

    · The learner will expand on the outline with annotations for at least 3 points with support from peer-reviewed scholarly articles.

    **Module 6: Week 6 – Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**

    · The presentation provides an opportunity for scholarly presentation on a topic of interest as a required skill for doctoral learners that is used in the dissertation proposal and dissertation final defense.

    · The learner will present their study in a narrated presentation that is developed for a professional audience of emerging experts in the field of traumatology.

    **Module 7: Week 7 – Traumatology Paper Assignment**

    · The paper is the culminating assignment for the study conducted during the EDCO 790 course.

    · The learner will integrate what has been developed through the previous study assignments and feedback from the professor on these to write the final paper.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 15 to >12 pts

    Advanced

    A Professional APA style
    abstract is present with
    excellent content and
    formatting.

    12 to >8 pts

    Proficient

    A Professional
    APA style abstract
    is present. May
    have minor
    content or
    formatting errors.

    8 to >7 pts

    Developing

    An abstract is
    present. Content
    or formatting
    errors are present
    in several areas.

    7 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    An abstract may
    be used but may
    not have APA
    formatting or may
    be missing some
    content.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 15
    pts

    Content 95 to >76 pts

    Advanced

    Assertions are relevant to
    the topic as well as the
    population of interest. All
    information is presented
    with the analysis and
    synthesis of extensive,
    relevant research from
    course texts as well as
    outside sources.
    Considerations for the
    population of interest are
    included throughout. All
    required elements are
    discussed. Topics are
    designed for an APA,
    scholarly audience of
    emerging experts in the
    field of traumatology.
    Topics are discussed
    without the use of direct
    quotes.

    76 to >51 pts

    Proficient

    Assertions are
    mostly relevant to
    the topic and to
    the population of
    interest.
    Information
    presented
    includes relevant
    research.
    Required
    elements are
    included and
    mostly designed
    for emerging
    experts in the field
    of traumatology.
    Direct quotes are
    used only
    sparingly, if at all.

    51 to >35 pts

    Developing

    Assertions may
    have relevance to
    the topic or to the
    population of
    interest but may
    lack a cogent tie
    between them, or
    the topic may not
    be focused.
    Information may
    include research
    and may be
    designed for
    emerging experts
    in the field of
    traumatology.
    There may be the
    use of direct
    quotes.

    35 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Assertions may be
    inconsistent, or
    there may be no
    population of
    interest.
    Information may
    not be appropriate
    for emerging
    experts in the field
    of traumatology or
    not designed for a
    scholarly
    audience. Direct
    quotes may have
    been present
    throughout.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 95
    pts

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 40 to >32 pts

    Advanced

    Biblical application
    (verses/ passages) is
    clearly integrated into text
    along with the use of
    Christian counseling or
    biblical scholarship. Faith
    based topics are
    discussed in a scholarly
    way with relevance
    clarified to an APA
    scholarly audience.

    32 to >22.5 pts

    Proficient

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is integrated into
    text. The use of
    Christian
    counseling or
    biblical
    scholarship
    references may
    be relevant or
    present.
    Relevance of the
    topics may be
    clarified and
    written to an APA
    scholarly
    audience.

    22.5 to >15 pts

    Developing

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is present and
    may include
    references but is
    not properly
    integrated.

    15 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Biblical application
    (verses/passages)
    is marginally
    present but no to
    low use of
    references or
    scholary
    integration is
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 40
    pts

    Structure 25 to >20 pts

    Advanced

    The assignment contains
    no spelling and grammar
    errors. Excelllent
    Professional APA style
    formatting is accurately
    applied throughout.
    Transitions and Headings
    are used to add to
    organizational clarity.
    Scholarly voice is used
    consistently throughout
    the presentation. The
    body of the paper was 12
    to 15 pages in length.

    20 to >15 pts

    Proficient

    The assignment
    contains only
    minor spelling and
    grammar errors.
    APA style
    formatting is
    present.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used to add to
    organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used in
    the submission.
    The body of the
    paper was 12 to
    15 pages in
    length.

    15 to >10 pts

    Developing

    The assignment
    contains spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present but may
    have mistakes.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used but may
    have errors.
    Scholarly voice
    may not be used
    consistently. The
    paper may be
    over 15 pages or
    under 12 pages in
    length.

    10 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Spelling and
    grammar errors
    may be present in
    several areas of
    the submission.
    APA formatting
    may be present
    but may have
    mistakes or may
    be inconsistent.
    Transitions and
    Headings may not
    be used. Scholarly
    voice may not be
    used. The body of
    the paper may not
    have met length
    requirements.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 25
    pts

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Structure 25 to >20 pts

    Advanced

    Meets or exceeds the
    required number of
    scholarly journal articles
    (15) in the body of the
    paper and in the
    references section. These
    sources were in addition
    to other, quality sources
    from the course texts
    utilized in the paper.
    Professional APA
    formatting is accurate in
    the sources.

    20 to >15 pts

    Proficient

    Meets the
    required number
    of scholarly
    journal articles in
    the body of the
    paper and in the
    references
    section. Some
    minor APA style
    errors may be
    noted in the
    sources.

    15 to >10 pts

    Developing

    May not meet the
    required number
    of sources in the
    body of the paper
    or in the
    references
    section. Some
    sources may not
    be scholarly. APA
    errors may be
    noted in the
    sources.

    10 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Does not meet the
    required number
    of sources or
    sources do not
    meet
    requirements. APA
    issues are noted
    in the sources.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 25
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric | EDCO790_B02_202640

    **## TraumatologyPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Paper Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This Professional APA style
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment** requires a specific focus on a narrow portion of the knowledge gained from this course. This paper builds upon the knowledge gained in the course and is the culmination of the series of assignments that began with
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**, and finally, this assignment, the
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings in more than one modality.

    In this final assignment, the student will summarize the learning from this course and from outside sources to discuss one in-depth topic in traumatology. By this point in the course, the topic should be sufficiently narrowed in both scope and population to one, specific aspect of traumatology. Learners may find that they wish to continue to narrow their topic significantly from the
    **Traumatology Outline Assignment** and
    **Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation** and may do so along with the feedback from the Instructor throughout the course. Since doctoral students are frequently required to write on the same topic, including during the dissertation phase of the program, it is required that information in this paper must demonstrate a deepening view of the scholarship utilized throughout the course.
    **Note**: As this is the culmination of the series of course assignments, it is expected that this paper will show further depth of scholarly discourse as built from insight with all of the assignments.
    **It is expected that the paper will show continuation of points made and references used for these previous assignments – the paper will exhibit further depth**. This will be considered in examination of the learner’s Turnitin report for the paper. Problem matches on Turnitin would be matches with course work outside what the learner has been building through the course.

    Topics should be narrowed to a specific population of interest or compared and contrasted among populations to indicate specific recognition of risk and resilience factors that may play a role in the presentation or treatment of the trauma. The paper should include a scholarly approach to the topic and the following sections: Topic, Population of Interest, Variables Associated with the Topic, and Topics for Future Research.

    **Instructions** Include the following components in your
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**:

    · The paper must include the following:

    ·
    **Professional APA style Title Page**

    ·
    **Professional APA style Abstract**

    ·
    **Professional APA style Heading and Organizations**.

    · Professional APA style summary introduction, headings, subheadings, transitions, and conclusion.

    ·
    **Discussion of the Topic of Study**

    · Introduction to the topic and information of what the current research states regarding what is currently known about the topic.
    **Note:** this paper’s audience is a scholarly audience of emerging traumatology experts. Do not include sections of information that should be well-known to this audience.

    ·
    **Population of Interest**

    · A specific population of interest and the relevance of studying this population must be discussed.

    · Information regarding risk factors, population data (including country or countries of interest), base rate or incidence rate of the topic within the population, and other pertinent information that offers a clear view of topic related to the population of interest for the paper.

    · Information regarding the relevance of studying the population could include rationales such as: poor representation of the population of interest in the literature, a personal interest in the population (i.e., ministry or vocation), local community concern, vulnerability issues, etc.

    · The section could also note current research on the topic with the population of interest or a similar population or scholarly sources that state there is no research on the topic, further supporting the need for the topic to be studied with the population of interest.

    ·
    **Variables Associated with the Topic**

    · This section should include an expansion of the topic that is specific to the population of interest and the factors that affect how this topic in traumatology is experienced by the population indicated.

    · Information in this section could include elements such as relevant symptoms, short- and long-term effects associated with the topic, frequently occurring comorbidities, and an overview of recommended treatment methodologies for the type of trauma selected for the focus of this paper.
    **Note: the population of interest must be discussed throughout.**

    ·
    **Biblical Integration**

    · This section must present a scholarly discussion of biblical integration, Christian counseling, Christian accommodative practices, Chaplain work, pastoral counseling, or other published topics related to the topic and population of interest.

    · Bible verses and Christian or faith-based topics can be discussed along with appropriate scholarship (commentaries, theology references, etc.).
    **Note:** the audience for this paper is a Professional APA, scholarly reader, not necessarily a Christian audience. Please use scholarship that supports the use of biblical integration with appropriate populations.

    ·
    **Topics for Future Research**

    · This section should include information on what research has found as gaps in the literature and what should continue to be the focus for future researchers.

    · The learner may extrapolate from research in this section, particularly if there is a rationale of underlying scholarship.

    · For instance, if the learner’s topic and population of interest is regarding evidence based treatment for Asian American women who have endured military sexual assault (MSA), but the literature does not offer a scholarly basis for future researchers on this specific topic and population, the learner could extrapolate an argument for this from previous literature on MSA in the female population, in general, making the specific notation regarding how the rationale was derived clear to the audience.

    **Additional Information**

    **Other Requirements**

    · The topic and population of interest discussion should be addressed toward a scholarly audience of emerging traumatology experts throughout the paper. Slang, non-professional language, contractions, references to the editorial “we”, pop-psychology jargon, and other references or discussions that are not scholarly should be omitted.

    · The body of the
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment** should be between 12 and 15 pages (not including title page, abstract, and references).

    · Use current Professional APA formatting, organization, voice, and structure throughout.

    · Please use only Times New Roman 12 point font throughout.

    · There must be a minimum of 15 scholarly journals that have been published in the last 3 years used in the references.

    · Texts from this course may be used as sources; they will be in addition
    to the other required sources.

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Traumatology Paper Grading Rubric** before beginning this
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **PriorUnit3-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit3-needcorrectionsassignment-traumatologyannotatedoutline-docx-10607779)

    **PriorUnit5-NeedCorrections-AnalysisintheStudyofTraumaPartTwoAssignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit5-needcorrections-analysisinthestudyoftraumaparttwoassignment-docx)

    **Reading-Chapt.28-30LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-chapt-28-30leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **PriorUnit4-NeedCorrectionsAssignment-TraumatologyAnnotatedOutline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/priorunit4-needcorrectionsassignment-traumatologyannotatedoutline-docx-10607783)

    **ReadingChapt.11-15BriereLJJ.L0ScottLJC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-11-15briereljj-l0scottljc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

  • [Solved] SONA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Participating in real research studies is a valuable way to learn about and experience some of the concepts that we are learning about in class. This assignment is worth 10 points (5 points for the sona credits and 5 points for the questions).

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Participating in real research studies is a valuable way to learn about and experience some of the concepts that we are learning about in class. This assignment is worth 10 points (5 points for the sona credits and 5 points for the questions).

  • [Solved] What Is the Fox Slots Casino Experience Like?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I’m interested in hearing what other players think about the overall Fox Slots Casino experience, especially how the platform is organized and what features are available after registration. Could someone explain how the registration and login process works and whether setting up an account is strai…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I’m interested in hearing what other players think about the overall Fox Slots Casino experience, especially how the platform is organized and what features are available after registration.

    Could someone explain how the registration and login process works and whether setting up an account is straightforward? I’m also curious about the payment options, particularly the available cryptocurrencies, as well as how deposits, withdrawals, and account verification are handled. I came across [https://casino-fox-slots.com/](https://casino-fox-slots.com/) while looking for more information and would like to compare the experience with other crypto casinos.

    Another thing I’d like to know is what the platform offers beyond the basic casino games. How useful are the welcome bonuses, regular promotions, cashback offers, tournaments, and VIP features? I’d also be interested in opinions about the game selection and providers, including slots and live casino options.

    Overall, how would you rate the website navigation, account management, payment system, and responsible gambling tools? Are there any notable advantages or limitations that new players should know about before creating an account?

  • [Solved] What Makes PlayFoxSlots Worth Exploring?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I’m interested in learning more about PlayFoxSlots and how its casino platform is organized for regular online players. Could someone share their experience with the available game selection and website layout? I’m particularly interested in how easy it is to browse different slot categories, live c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I’m interested in learning more about PlayFoxSlots and how its casino platform is organized for regular online players.

    Could someone share their experience with the available game selection and website layout? I’m particularly interested in how easy it is to browse different slot categories, live casino games, table games, new releases, jackpot titles, and popular games. It would also be useful to know whether the search and category filters make finding specific games convenient. If anyone has a detailed overview, a relevant resource like [relevant resource](https://playfoxslots.com/en/) would be useful for comparing the main sections of the platform.

    I’d also like to know more about the promotional side of the casino. How easy is it to find current bonuses, tournaments, and VIP-related offers? Are these sections clearly separated from the main game lobby, and does the website make it simple to move between games, promotions, tournaments, and account features?

    Overall, how would you describe the PlayFoxSlots experience compared with a typical online casino? I’m mainly interested in the variety of games, navigation, interface, mobile usability, and whether the different casino sections are easy to understand without making the website feel unnecessarily complicated

  • [Solved] discussion board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe in some detail a significant death-related or other loss experience in your own life. How old were you at the time? What happened—when and where? Who was involved? How did you react? What was the grief like and how long did it last? What made the experience more or less difficult? Was there…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe in some detail a significant death-related or other loss experience in your own life.  How old were you at the time?  What happened—when and where?  Who was involved?  How did you react?  What was the grief like and how long did it last? What made the experience more or less difficult?  Was there someone who was particularly helpful (or unhelpful)?  What did they do or say that helped/didn't help you?  Why?

  • [Solved] MAT MILESTONE 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED **files (2)** – ## MAT202YourPaceMilestone3.docx – MAT_202_YourPace_Milestone_3_DataUpdated.xlsx **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone3.docx** ## MAT 202 Milestone 3 **Application-Based Assessment: Two Population Hypothesis Testing Assessment** **Scenario:** MediCore Pharmaceuticals is cond…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    **files (2)**

    – ## MAT202YourPaceMilestone3.docx

    – MAT_202_YourPace_Milestone_3_DataUpdated.xlsx

    **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone3.docx**

    ## MAT 202 Milestone 3

    **Application-Based Assessment: Two Population Hypothesis Testing Assessment**

    **Scenario:** MediCore Pharmaceuticals is conducting comprehensive clinical trials for a new cardiovascular medication called "HeartGuard." As the lead biostatistician, you must analyze multiple aspects of the trial data to determine the medication's effectiveness and safety profile compared to existing treatments and control groups.

    **Data:** Download the dataset ‘MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 3 Data’ and import it into Minitab.

    The dataset contains clinical trial results with the following variables:

    · PatientID: Unique identifier for each patient

    · Treatment: Treatment group (HeartGuard, Placebo, StandardDrug)

    · Gender: Patient gender (Male, Female)

    · Age: Patient age in years

    · BloodPressure_Before: Systolic blood pressure before treatment (mmHg)

    · BloodPressure_After: Systolic blood pressure after 6 months (mmHg)

    · SideEffects: Whether patient experienced side effects (Yes, No)

    · Compliance: Treatment compliance rate (%)

    · Population_SD_Known: Blood pressure population standard deviation for known variance studies

    **Submission:** Submit your Word document with all graphs, charts, and outputs and your .mpx Minitab file.

    **Part A: Hypothesis Test Classification**

    **Background**

    Before conducting any statistical analysis, you must properly classify the types of hypothesis tests needed for different research questions.

    **A1. Test Type Identification**

    For each of the following research questions, identify:

    1. The type of hypothesis test needed

    2. The parameter(s) being tested

    3. Whether it involves one or two populations

    4. The nature of the data (means, proportions, paired samples)

    **Research Questions:** a) Is there a difference in average blood pressure reduction between HeartGuard and the standard drug?

    b) Do patients taking HeartGuard have a different rate of side effects compared to those taking placebo?

    c) Is HeartGuard more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure?

    d) Does HeartGuard reduce blood pressure more effectively than the standard drug, assuming population standard deviations are known from previous studies?

    e) Is there a significant difference in blood pressure before and after HeartGuard treatment in the same patients?

    f) Do male and female patients show different compliance rates with HeartGuard?

    **Part B: Two Population Means – Known Standard Deviations**

    **Background**

    Previous large-scale studies have established that the population standard deviation for systolic blood pressure reduction is 8.5 mmHg for HeartGuard and 9.2 mmHg for standard drug treatments.

    **B1. Research Question Setup**

    **Research Question:** Is there a significant difference in mean blood pressure reduction between HeartGuard and the standard drug, assuming known population standard deviations?

    **Minitab:** Using only HeartGuard and StandardDrug groups, calculate the blood pressure reduction for each patient (Before – After) in a new column.

    **B2. Hypothesis Test Execution**

    a) State your null and alternative hypotheses.

    b) Use Minitab to perform the test (provide screenshots of your setup and results).

    c) Report the test statistic and the p-value.

    d) Make a decision using α = 0.05

    **B3. Results Interpretation**

    a) Interpret your statistical results in the context of the clinical trial

    b) What are the limitations of assuming known population standard deviations in this context?

    **Part C: Two Population Means – Unknown Standard Deviations**

    **Background**

    In reality, population standard deviations are typically unknown and must be estimated from sample data.

    **C1. Comparative Effectiveness Analysis**

    **Research Question:** Is HeartGuard significantly more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure when population standard deviations are unknown?

    a) Filter data for HeartGuard and Placebo groups only:

    · Go to Data > Subset Worksheet.

    · In the dialog box, select "Specify which rows to include".

    · Click Condition button.

    · Set condition: Treatment = "HeartGuard" OR Treatment = "Placebo".

    · Click OK to create a new worksheet with only these two groups.

    · Name the new worksheet "HeartGuard_vs_Placebo".

    b) Calculate blood pressure reduction for each group:

    · In the new worksheet, go to Calc > Calculator.

    · Store result in: BP_Reduction.

    · Expression: 'BloodPressure_Before' – 'BloodPressure_After'.

    · Click OK.

    · This creates a new column showing how much each patient's blood pressure decreased.

    · Note: Positive values indicate blood pressure reduction (improvement).

    c) Create separate columns for each treatment group:

    · Go to Calc > Calculator again.

    · Store result in: HeartGuard_Reduction.

    · Expression: IF('Treatment'="HeartGuard",'BP_Reduction',"*").

    · Click OK.

    · Repeat for Placebo.

    · Store result in: Placebo_Reduction.

    · Expression: IF('Treatment'="Placebo",'BP_Reduction',"*").

    · Click OK.

    d) Check assumptions for the two-sample t-test using appropriate diagnostics:

    · Normality Check:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > Normality Test.

    · Select HeartGuard_Reduction (ignore missing values).

    · Choose Anderson-Darling test, click OK.

    · Repeat for Placebo_Reduction.

    · Equal Variances Check:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Variances.

    · First sample: HeartGuard_Reduction.

    · Second sample: Placebo_Reduction.

    · Click OK.

    · Visual Inspection:

    · Go to Graph > Boxplot > Multiple Y's Simple.

    · Add both HeartGuard_Reduction and Placebo_Reduction.

    · Click OK to compare distributions visually.

    **C2. Statistical Analysis**

    d) Conduct the appropriate two-sample t-test in Minitab .

    1. Navigate to the test:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.

    2. Set up the data format:

    · Select "Samples in different columns".

    · First: Select first group's data column (e.g., HeartGuard_Reduction).

    · Second: Select second group's data column (e.g., Placebo_Reduction).

    3. Configure the test.

    · Alternative hypothesis: Choose from:

    · "Not equal" (two-tailed test: μ₁ ≠ μ₂).

    · "Less than" (left-tailed test: μ₁ < μ₂).

    · "Greater than" (right-tailed test: μ₁ > μ₂).

    · Confidence level: Usually 95.0 (for α = 0.05).

    4. Handle equal variances:

    · Check "Assume equal variances" if your variance test showed equal variances.

    · Leave unchecked for Welch's t-test (unequal variances).

    5. Click OK to run the test.

    e) Report all relevant statistics (means, standard deviations, test statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value).

    **C3. Comprehensive Comparison**

    g) Now compare HeartGuard vs. StandardDrug using the same methodology.

    h) Create a summary table comparing HeartGuard against both Placebo and StandardDrug.

    i) Which comparison shows the strongest evidence of HeartGuard's effectiveness?

    **C4. Effect Size Analysis**

    j) Calculate and interpret Cohen's d for both comparisons.

    k) Classify the effect sizes as small, medium, or large.

    l) Discuss the clinical significance of these effect sizes.

    **Part D: Two Population Proportions**

    **Background**

    Side effects are a critical consideration in pharmaceutical approval. You need to compare side effect rates between treatment groups.

    **D1. Side Effects Analysis – Primary Comparison**

    **Research Question:** Is there a significant difference in the proportion of patients experiencing side effects between HeartGuard and Placebo groups?

    Using Minitab:

    a) Create a contingency table for Treatment (HeartGuard vs. Placebo) and SideEffects.

    For creating a contingency table with counts and percentages:

    1. Navigate to the tool:

    · Stat > Tables > Cross Tabulation and Chi-Square

    · For rows: Treatment

    · For columns: SideEffects

    · Check: Counts, Row percents, Column percents

    · Click OK

    b) Verify that conditions for the two-proportion z-test are met.

    For Proportion Testing:

    After creating the contingency table, you can:

    1. Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions

    2. Select "Summarized data"

    3. Enter the counts from your contingency table

    4. Enter sample sizes for each group

    **D2. Hypothesis Testing for Proportions**

    c) Set up appropriate hypotheses for this research question.

    d) Conduct the two-proportion z-test in Minitab.

    e) Report the test statistic, p-value, and confidence interval for the difference in proportions.

    f) Make a statistical decision using α = 0.01.

    **Part E: Matched or Paired Samples**

    **Background**

    The most direct way to assess HeartGuard's effectiveness is to compare each patient's blood pressure before and after treatment.

    **E1. Before-After Analysis Setup**

    **Research Question:** Does HeartGuard significantly reduce blood pressure in patients after 6 months of treatment?

    Using Minitab:

    a) Filter data to include only HeartGuard patients

    b) Create a new variable for blood pressure differences (Before – After)

    c) Examine the distribution of differences using appropriate plots.

    **E2. Paired Sample Analysis**

    d) Check assumptions for the paired t-test.

    e) Conduct the paired t-test in Minitab.

    f) Report the mean difference, standard deviation of differences, test statistic, and p-value.

    g) Calculate and interpret the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference.

    **MAT_202_YourPace_Milestone_3_DataUpdated.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat-202-yourpace-milestone-3-dataupdated-xlsx)

    **MAT_202_YourPace_Milestone_3_DataUpdated.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat-202-yourpace-milestone-3-dataupdated-xlsx)

    **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone3.docx**

    ## MAT 202 Milestone 3

    **Application-Based Assessment: Two Population Hypothesis Testing Assessment**

    **Scenario:** MediCore Pharmaceuticals is conducting comprehensive clinical trials for a new cardiovascular medication called "HeartGuard." As the lead biostatistician, you must analyze multiple aspects of the trial data to determine the medication's effectiveness and safety profile compared to existing treatments and control groups.

    **Data:** Download the dataset ‘MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 3 Data’ and import it into Minitab.

    The dataset contains clinical trial results with the following variables:

    · PatientID: Unique identifier for each patient

    · Treatment: Treatment group (HeartGuard, Placebo, StandardDrug)

    · Gender: Patient gender (Male, Female)

    · Age: Patient age in years

    · BloodPressure_Before: Systolic blood pressure before treatment (mmHg)

    · BloodPressure_After: Systolic blood pressure after 6 months (mmHg)

    · SideEffects: Whether patient experienced side effects (Yes, No)

    · Compliance: Treatment compliance rate (%)

    · Population_SD_Known: Blood pressure population standard deviation for known variance studies

    **Submission:** Submit your Word document with all graphs, charts, and outputs and your .mpx Minitab file.

    **Part A: Hypothesis Test Classification**

    **Background**

    Before conducting any statistical analysis, you must properly classify the types of hypothesis tests needed for different research questions.

    **A1. Test Type Identification**

    For each of the following research questions, identify:

    1. The type of hypothesis test needed

    2. The parameter(s) being tested

    3. Whether it involves one or two populations

    4. The nature of the data (means, proportions, paired samples)

    **Research Questions:** a) Is there a difference in average blood pressure reduction between HeartGuard and the standard drug?

    b) Do patients taking HeartGuard have a different rate of side effects compared to those taking placebo?

    c) Is HeartGuard more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure?

    d) Does HeartGuard reduce blood pressure more effectively than the standard drug, assuming population standard deviations are known from previous studies?

    e) Is there a significant difference in blood pressure before and after HeartGuard treatment in the same patients?

    f) Do male and female patients show different compliance rates with HeartGuard?

    **Part B: Two Population Means – Known Standard Deviations**

    **Background**

    Previous large-scale studies have established that the population standard deviation for systolic blood pressure reduction is 8.5 mmHg for HeartGuard and 9.2 mmHg for standard drug treatments.

    **B1. Research Question Setup**

    **Research Question:** Is there a significant difference in mean blood pressure reduction between HeartGuard and the standard drug, assuming known population standard deviations?

    **Minitab:** Using only HeartGuard and StandardDrug groups, calculate the blood pressure reduction for each patient (Before – After) in a new column.

    **B2. Hypothesis Test Execution**

    a) State your null and alternative hypotheses.

    b) Use Minitab to perform the test (provide screenshots of your setup and results).

    c) Report the test statistic and the p-value.

    d) Make a decision using α = 0.05

    **B3. Results Interpretation**

    a) Interpret your statistical results in the context of the clinical trial

    b) What are the limitations of assuming known population standard deviations in this context?

    **Part C: Two Population Means – Unknown Standard Deviations**

    **Background**

    In reality, population standard deviations are typically unknown and must be estimated from sample data.

    **C1. Comparative Effectiveness Analysis**

    **Research Question:** Is HeartGuard significantly more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure when population standard deviations are unknown?

    a) Filter data for HeartGuard and Placebo groups only:

    · Go to Data > Subset Worksheet.

    · In the dialog box, select "Specify which rows to include".

    · Click Condition button.

    · Set condition: Treatment = "HeartGuard" OR Treatment = "Placebo".

    · Click OK to create a new worksheet with only these two groups.

    · Name the new worksheet "HeartGuard_vs_Placebo".

    b) Calculate blood pressure reduction for each group:

    · In the new worksheet, go to Calc > Calculator.

    · Store result in: BP_Reduction.

    · Expression: 'BloodPressure_Before' – 'BloodPressure_After'.

    · Click OK.

    · This creates a new column showing how much each patient's blood pressure decreased.

    · Note: Positive values indicate blood pressure reduction (improvement).

    c) Create separate columns for each treatment group:

    · Go to Calc > Calculator again.

    · Store result in: HeartGuard_Reduction.

    · Expression: IF('Treatment'="HeartGuard",'BP_Reduction',"*").

    · Click OK.

    · Repeat for Placebo.

    · Store result in: Placebo_Reduction.

    · Expression: IF('Treatment'="Placebo",'BP_Reduction',"*").

    · Click OK.

    d) Check assumptions for the two-sample t-test using appropriate diagnostics:

    · Normality Check:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > Normality Test.

    · Select HeartGuard_Reduction (ignore missing values).

    · Choose Anderson-Darling test, click OK.

    · Repeat for Placebo_Reduction.

    · Equal Variances Check:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Variances.

    · First sample: HeartGuard_Reduction.

    · Second sample: Placebo_Reduction.

    · Click OK.

    · Visual Inspection:

    · Go to Graph > Boxplot > Multiple Y's Simple.

    · Add both HeartGuard_Reduction and Placebo_Reduction.

    · Click OK to compare distributions visually.

    **C2. Statistical Analysis**

    d) Conduct the appropriate two-sample t-test in Minitab .

    1. Navigate to the test:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.

    2. Set up the data format:

    · Select "Samples in different columns".

    · First: Select first group's data column (e.g., HeartGuard_Reduction).

    · Second: Select second group's data column (e.g., Placebo_Reduction).

    3. Configure the test.

    · Alternative hypothesis: Choose from:

    · "Not equal" (two-tailed test: μ₁ ≠ μ₂).

    · "Less than" (left-tailed test: μ₁ < μ₂).

    · "Greater than" (right-tailed test: μ₁ > μ₂).

    · Confidence level: Usually 95.0 (for α = 0.05).

    4. Handle equal variances:

    · Check "Assume equal variances" if your variance test showed equal variances.

    · Leave unchecked for Welch's t-test (unequal variances).

    5. Click OK to run the test.

    e) Report all relevant statistics (means, standard deviations, test statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value).

    **C3. Comprehensive Comparison**

    g) Now compare HeartGuard vs. StandardDrug using the same methodology.

    h) Create a summary table comparing HeartGuard against both Placebo and StandardDrug.

    i) Which comparison shows the strongest evidence of HeartGuard's effectiveness?

    **C4. Effect Size Analysis**

    j) Calculate and interpret Cohen's d for both comparisons.

    k) Classify the effect sizes as small, medium, or large.

    l) Discuss the clinical significance of these effect sizes.

    **Part D: Two Population Proportions**

    **Background**

    Side effects are a critical consideration in pharmaceutical approval. You need to compare side effect rates between treatment groups.

    **D1. Side Effects Analysis – Primary Comparison**

    **Research Question:** Is there a significant difference in the proportion of patients experiencing side effects between HeartGuard and Placebo groups?

    Using Minitab:

    a) Create a contingency table for Treatment (HeartGuard vs. Placebo) and SideEffects.

    For creating a contingency table with counts and percentages:

    1. Navigate to the tool:

    · Stat > Tables > Cross Tabulation and Chi-Square

    · For rows: Treatment

    · For columns: SideEffects

    · Check: Counts, Row percents, Column percents

    · Click OK

    b) Verify that conditions for the two-proportion z-test are met.

    For Proportion Testing:

    After creating the contingency table, you can:

    1. Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions

    2. Select "Summarized data"

    3. Enter the counts from your contingency table

    4. Enter sample sizes for each group

    **D2. Hypothesis Testing for Proportions**

    c) Set up appropriate hypotheses for this research question.

    d) Conduct the two-proportion z-test in Minitab.

    e) Report the test statistic, p-value, and confidence interval for the difference in proportions.

    f) Make a statistical decision using α = 0.01.

    **Part E: Matched or Paired Samples**

    **Background**

    The most direct way to assess HeartGuard's effectiveness is to compare each patient's blood pressure before and after treatment.

    **E1. Before-After Analysis Setup**

    **Research Question:** Does HeartGuard significantly reduce blood pressure in patients after 6 months of treatment?

    Using Minitab:

    a) Filter data to include only HeartGuard patients

    b) Create a new variable for blood pressure differences (Before – After)

    c) Examine the distribution of differences using appropriate plots.

    **E2. Paired Sample Analysis**

    d) Check assumptions for the paired t-test.

    e) Conduct the paired t-test in Minitab.

    f) Report the mean difference, standard deviation of differences, test statistic, and p-value.

    g) Calculate and interpret the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference.

    **MAT_202_YourPace_Milestone_3_DataUpdated.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat-202-yourpace-milestone-3-dataupdated-xlsx)

    **## MAT202YourPaceMilestone3.docx**

    ## MAT 202 Milestone 3

    **Application-Based Assessment: Two Population Hypothesis Testing Assessment**

    **Scenario:** MediCore Pharmaceuticals is conducting comprehensive clinical trials for a new cardiovascular medication called "HeartGuard." As the lead biostatistician, you must analyze multiple aspects of the trial data to determine the medication's effectiveness and safety profile compared to existing treatments and control groups.

    **Data:** Download the dataset ‘MAT 202 YourPace Milestone 3 Data’ and import it into Minitab.

    The dataset contains clinical trial results with the following variables:

    · PatientID: Unique identifier for each patient

    · Treatment: Treatment group (HeartGuard, Placebo, StandardDrug)

    · Gender: Patient gender (Male, Female)

    · Age: Patient age in years

    · BloodPressure_Before: Systolic blood pressure before treatment (mmHg)

    · BloodPressure_After: Systolic blood pressure after 6 months (mmHg)

    · SideEffects: Whether patient experienced side effects (Yes, No)

    · Compliance: Treatment compliance rate (%)

    · Population_SD_Known: Blood pressure population standard deviation for known variance studies

    **Submission:** Submit your Word document with all graphs, charts, and outputs and your .mpx Minitab file.

    **Part A: Hypothesis Test Classification**

    **Background**

    Before conducting any statistical analysis, you must properly classify the types of hypothesis tests needed for different research questions.

    **A1. Test Type Identification**

    For each of the following research questions, identify:

    1. The type of hypothesis test needed

    2. The parameter(s) being tested

    3. Whether it involves one or two populations

    4. The nature of the data (means, proportions, paired samples)

    **Research Questions:** a) Is there a difference in average blood pressure reduction between HeartGuard and the standard drug?

    b) Do patients taking HeartGuard have a different rate of side effects compared to those taking placebo?

    c) Is HeartGuard more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure?

    d) Does HeartGuard reduce blood pressure more effectively than the standard drug, assuming population standard deviations are known from previous studies?

    e) Is there a significant difference in blood pressure before and after HeartGuard treatment in the same patients?

    f) Do male and female patients show different compliance rates with HeartGuard?

    **Part B: Two Population Means – Known Standard Deviations**

    **Background**

    Previous large-scale studies have established that the population standard deviation for systolic blood pressure reduction is 8.5 mmHg for HeartGuard and 9.2 mmHg for standard drug treatments.

    **B1. Research Question Setup**

    **Research Question:** Is there a significant difference in mean blood pressure reduction between HeartGuard and the standard drug, assuming known population standard deviations?

    **Minitab:** Using only HeartGuard and StandardDrug groups, calculate the blood pressure reduction for each patient (Before – After) in a new column.

    **B2. Hypothesis Test Execution**

    a) State your null and alternative hypotheses.

    b) Use Minitab to perform the test (provide screenshots of your setup and results).

    c) Report the test statistic and the p-value.

    d) Make a decision using α = 0.05

    **B3. Results Interpretation**

    a) Interpret your statistical results in the context of the clinical trial

    b) What are the limitations of assuming known population standard deviations in this context?

    **Part C: Two Population Means – Unknown Standard Deviations**

    **Background**

    In reality, population standard deviations are typically unknown and must be estimated from sample data.

    **C1. Comparative Effectiveness Analysis**

    **Research Question:** Is HeartGuard significantly more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure when population standard deviations are unknown?

    a) Filter data for HeartGuard and Placebo groups only:

    · Go to Data > Subset Worksheet.

    · In the dialog box, select "Specify which rows to include".

    · Click Condition button.

    · Set condition: Treatment = "HeartGuard" OR Treatment = "Placebo".

    · Click OK to create a new worksheet with only these two groups.

    · Name the new worksheet "HeartGuard_vs_Placebo".

    b) Calculate blood pressure reduction for each group:

    · In the new worksheet, go to Calc > Calculator.

    · Store result in: BP_Reduction.

    · Expression: 'BloodPressure_Before' – 'BloodPressure_After'.

    · Click OK.

    · This creates a new column showing how much each patient's blood pressure decreased.

    · Note: Positive values indicate blood pressure reduction (improvement).

    c) Create separate columns for each treatment group:

    · Go to Calc > Calculator again.

    · Store result in: HeartGuard_Reduction.

    · Expression: IF('Treatment'="HeartGuard",'BP_Reduction',"*").

    · Click OK.

    · Repeat for Placebo.

    · Store result in: Placebo_Reduction.

    · Expression: IF('Treatment'="Placebo",'BP_Reduction',"*").

    · Click OK.

    d) Check assumptions for the two-sample t-test using appropriate diagnostics:

    · Normality Check:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > Normality Test.

    · Select HeartGuard_Reduction (ignore missing values).

    · Choose Anderson-Darling test, click OK.

    · Repeat for Placebo_Reduction.

    · Equal Variances Check:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Variances.

    · First sample: HeartGuard_Reduction.

    · Second sample: Placebo_Reduction.

    · Click OK.

    · Visual Inspection:

    · Go to Graph > Boxplot > Multiple Y's Simple.

    · Add both HeartGuard_Reduction and Placebo_Reduction.

    · Click OK to compare distributions visually.

    **C2. Statistical Analysis**

    d) Conduct the appropriate two-sample t-test in Minitab .

    1. Navigate to the test:

    · Go to Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.

    2. Set up the data format:

    · Select "Samples in different columns".

    · First: Select first group's data column (e.g., HeartGuard_Reduction).

    · Second: Select second group's data column (e.g., Placebo_Reduction).

    3. Configure the test.

    · Alternative hypothesis: Choose from:

    · "Not equal" (two-tailed test: μ₁ ≠ μ₂).

    · "Less than" (left-tailed test: μ₁ < μ₂).

    · "Greater than" (right-tailed test: μ₁ > μ₂).

    · Confidence level: Usually 95.0 (for α = 0.05).

    4. Handle equal variances:

    · Check "Assume equal variances" if your variance test showed equal variances.

    · Leave unchecked for Welch's t-test (unequal variances).

    5. Click OK to run the test.

    e) Report all relevant statistics (means, standard deviations, test statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value).

    **C3. Comprehensive Comparison**

    g) Now compare HeartGuard vs. StandardDrug using the same methodology.

    h) Create a summary table comparing HeartGuard against both Placebo and StandardDrug.

    i) Which comparison shows the strongest evidence of HeartGuard's effectiveness?

    **C4. Effect Size Analysis**

    j) Calculate and interpret Cohen's d for both comparisons.

    k) Classify the effect sizes as small, medium, or large.

    l) Discuss the clinical significance of these effect sizes.

    **Part D: Two Population Proportions**

    **Background**

    Side effects are a critical consideration in pharmaceutical approval. You need to compare side effect rates between treatment groups.

    **D1. Side Effects Analysis – Primary Comparison**

    **Research Question:** Is there a significant difference in the proportion of patients experiencing side effects between HeartGuard and Placebo groups?

    Using Minitab:

    a) Create a contingency table for Treatment (HeartGuard vs. Placebo) and SideEffects.

    For creating a contingency table with counts and percentages:

    1. Navigate to the tool:

    · Stat > Tables > Cross Tabulation and Chi-Square

    · For rows: Treatment

    · For columns: SideEffects

    · Check: Counts, Row percents, Column percents

    · Click OK

    b) Verify that conditions for the two-proportion z-test are met.

    For Proportion Testing:

    After creating the contingency table, you can:

    1. Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions

    2. Select "Summarized data"

    3. Enter the counts from your contingency table

    4. Enter sample sizes for each group

    **D2. Hypothesis Testing for Proportions**

    c) Set up appropriate hypotheses for this research question.

    d) Conduct the two-proportion z-test in Minitab.

    e) Report the test statistic, p-value, and confidence interval for the difference in proportions.

    f) Make a statistical decision using α = 0.01.

    **Part E: Matched or Paired Samples**

    **Background**

    The most direct way to assess HeartGuard's effectiveness is to compare each patient's blood pressure before and after treatment.

    **E1. Before-After Analysis Setup**

    **Research Question:** Does HeartGuard significantly reduce blood pressure in patients after 6 months of treatment?

    Using Minitab:

    a) Filter data to include only HeartGuard patients

    b) Create a new variable for blood pressure differences (Before – After)

    c) Examine the distribution of differences using appropriate plots.

    **E2. Paired Sample Analysis**

    d) Check assumptions for the paired t-test.

    e) Conduct the paired t-test in Minitab.

    f) Report the mean difference, standard deviation of differences, test statistic, and p-value.

    g) Calculate and interpret the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference.

    **MAT_202_YourPace_Milestone_3_DataUpdated.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mat-202-yourpace-milestone-3-dataupdated-xlsx)