Tag: Care Plans

  • [Solved] See attached 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SWEET3.docx **## SWEET3.docx** MUST BE ORGINIAL WORK. Initial post – 3 paragraphs (must have 2 scholarly sources) AND one peer response (at least 1 scholarly source). **Initial post** **Step 1:** Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail. **Para…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SWEET3.docx

    **## SWEET3.docx**

    MUST BE ORGINIAL WORK. Initial post – 3 paragraphs (must have 2 scholarly sources) AND one peer response (at least 1 scholarly source).

    **Initial post**

    **Step 1:** Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

    **Paragraph one:** Imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council that has an interprofessional membership, and you want to implement your change project. Summarize the overall goal of your change project and recognize Council members as stakeholders in the process.

    **Paragraph two:** Describe each Council member’s roles and responsibilities specific to the change project. Explain how you would lead, inform, and coordinate the steps of the change project and leverage the expertise of each stakeholder.

    **Paragraph three:** Explain how you would address conflicts or concerns among Council members during the planning of the change project. Describe strategies you could use to address resistance to change.

    **References:** Provide complete references for all citations.

    **Respond to peer**

    KJ: “Our Quality Improvement Council is working to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and improve patient safety by using proven prevention methods. Each member plays an important role—nurses provide proper oral care, respiratory therapists manage ventilators, doctors assess when patients can breathe on their own, infection control monitors safety measures, pharmacists ensure proper antibiotic use, and leadership supports the process. By working together, we can reduce VAP and provide better care for our patients.

    As the project lead, I would clearly communicate goals, provide training, and foster collaboration among team members. Regular meetings would be held to review progress, discuss challenges, and adjust strategies as needed. I would develop educational sessions, visual reminders, and hands-on demonstrations to reinforce best practices. Each team members expertise would be leveraged by assigning specific tasks—nurses and respiratory therapists ensuring direct patient care measures, physicians making clinical decisions, pharmacists optimizing medication use, and infection control monitoring outcomes. Feedback from all members would be encouraged to improve the implementation process, ensuring a team-driven approach that leads to sustained improvement in VAP prevention.

    **Nurses**: Ensure proper oral care, maintain head-of-bed elevation, perform suctioning, and follow infection control protocols.

    **Respiratory Therapists**: Manage ventilator settings, promote early weaning and spontaneous breathing trials, and reduce sedation use.

    **Physicians & Advanced Practice Providers:** Assess readiness for extubation, oversee sedation vacations, and ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines.

    **Infection Control & Quality Improvement Teams**: Monitor compliance with VAP prevention bundles, track infection rates, and provide ongoing education.

    **Leadership & Administration:** Provide necessary resources, support policy changes, and ensure staff accountability and engagement.

    During the planning of the VAP prevention project, conflicts or concerns may arise due to differing perspectives, workload concerns, or skepticism about new practices. To address this, I would foster open communication, ensuring every member feels heard and valued. Regular team meetings would provide a platform to discuss concerns, clarify roles, and align on shared goals. If conflicts arise, I will facilitate discussions in a respectful, solution-focused manner, emphasizing patient safety and evidence-based benefits. When necessary, I would involve leadership to mediate and provide additional support.”

    **## SWEET3.docx**

    MUST BE ORGINIAL WORK. Initial post – 3 paragraphs (must have 2 scholarly sources) AND one peer response (at least 1 scholarly source).

    **Initial post**

    **Step 1:** Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

    **Paragraph one:** Imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council that has an interprofessional membership, and you want to implement your change project. Summarize the overall goal of your change project and recognize Council members as stakeholders in the process.

    **Paragraph two:** Describe each Council member’s roles and responsibilities specific to the change project. Explain how you would lead, inform, and coordinate the steps of the change project and leverage the expertise of each stakeholder.

    **Paragraph three:** Explain how you would address conflicts or concerns among Council members during the planning of the change project. Describe strategies you could use to address resistance to change.

    **References:** Provide complete references for all citations.

    **Respond to peer**

    KJ: “Our Quality Improvement Council is working to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and improve patient safety by using proven prevention methods. Each member plays an important role—nurses provide proper oral care, respiratory therapists manage ventilators, doctors assess when patients can breathe on their own, infection control monitors safety measures, pharmacists ensure proper antibiotic use, and leadership supports the process. By working together, we can reduce VAP and provide better care for our patients.

    As the project lead, I would clearly communicate goals, provide training, and foster collaboration among team members. Regular meetings would be held to review progress, discuss challenges, and adjust strategies as needed. I would develop educational sessions, visual reminders, and hands-on demonstrations to reinforce best practices. Each team members expertise would be leveraged by assigning specific tasks—nurses and respiratory therapists ensuring direct patient care measures, physicians making clinical decisions, pharmacists optimizing medication use, and infection control monitoring outcomes. Feedback from all members would be encouraged to improve the implementation process, ensuring a team-driven approach that leads to sustained improvement in VAP prevention.

    **Nurses**: Ensure proper oral care, maintain head-of-bed elevation, perform suctioning, and follow infection control protocols.

    **Respiratory Therapists**: Manage ventilator settings, promote early weaning and spontaneous breathing trials, and reduce sedation use.

    **Physicians & Advanced Practice Providers:** Assess readiness for extubation, oversee sedation vacations, and ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines.

    **Infection Control & Quality Improvement Teams**: Monitor compliance with VAP prevention bundles, track infection rates, and provide ongoing education.

    **Leadership & Administration:** Provide necessary resources, support policy changes, and ensure staff accountability and engagement.

    During the planning of the VAP prevention project, conflicts or concerns may arise due to differing perspectives, workload concerns, or skepticism about new practices. To address this, I would foster open communication, ensuring every member feels heard and valued. Regular team meetings would provide a platform to discuss concerns, clarify roles, and align on shared goals. If conflicts arise, I will facilitate discussions in a respectful, solution-focused manner, emphasizing patient safety and evidence-based benefits. When necessary, I would involve leadership to mediate and provide additional support.”

  • [Solved] four_parts

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## four_parts.docx **## four_parts.docx** **Assignment 2. Each assignment builds off each other.** Create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional colleague. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## four_parts.docx

    **## four_parts.docx**

    **Assignment 2. Each assignment builds off each other.**

    Create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional colleague. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

    By interviewing a healthcare colleague of your choice, you will begin to gather information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing, or has experienced, in the workplace. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies that can be applied to address this problem.

    For this assessment, you will report on the information gathered during your interview. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from literature. The goal of this assessment is to analyze the interview data and identify an issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary solution. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently in use. Additionally, you will prepare for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assessment by researching change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to the issue you have identified.

    Interview Template

    ## **Interview Summary**

    Summarize your interview in this section. Be sure to relate concise information about:

    · The healthcare organization that was discussed in the interview.

    · The interviewee’s role and duties.

    · The relevant issues at the organization.

    · Any relevant comments on the actions taken by the organization or leadership previously and their effectiveness.

    · The organizational culture related to collaboration.

    · Any relevant collaboration or interdisciplinary team experience your interviewee has had.

    The goal of this section is to convey what was discussed at the interview and set yourself up to identify an issue to pursue in throughout the rest of this assessment (and future assessments in this course), as well as have enough information about the situation at the organization to relate theories, strategies, and approaches to.

    ## **Issue Identification**

    Identify the issue from the interview that you think an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach is appropriate. Provide one or more specific reasons why an interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate for the issue.

    ### **Change Theories That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    For this section look to the literature and describe one or more change theories that would help to develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the change theory?

    · How could it heal create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the theory to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Leadership Strategies That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    This section is similar to the previous one, except you will be looking to the literature to help you describe one or more leadership strategy that would help develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the leadership strategy?

    · How could it create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the strategy to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams**

    Again, this section will be similar to the previous one, except that the focus will be on collaboration approaches. Depending on if your interviewee’s organization makes frequent use of interdisciplinary teams or not, your focus in this section may be on how to establish interdisciplinary teams and a collaborative foundation or how to improve the collaboration within an already established team. You should also briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What are the best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature?

    · How could it help establish or improve collaboration?

    · How relevant is the approach to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    be sure to address the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a healthcare organization.

    · Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

    · Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help in developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

    · Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old

    **APA formatting:** Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

    Assignment 2

    Create a 3 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue identified in the second assessment.

    Use the context of the organization from your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific organizational or patient outcome based on the information gathered in your interview.

    ## Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

    Write a brief introduction (2–3 sentences) to your proposal that outlines the issue you are attempting to solve, the part of the organization in which the plan would be carried out, and the desired outcome. This will set the stage for the sections below.

    ### Objective

    Describe what your plan will do and what you hope it will accomplish in one or two succinct sentences. Also, comment on how the objective, if achieved, will improve organizational or patient outcomes

    _._

    ### Questions and Predictions

    For this section ask yourself 3–5 questions about your objective and your overall plan. Make a prediction for each question by answering the question you posed. This helps you to define the important aspects of your plan as well as limit the scope and check its ability to be implemented.

    For example:

    1.
    _How much time will using a double-loop feedback model add to a project manager’s workload?_

    a. At first, it will likely increase their workloads by 5 to 10 percent. However, as the process is refined and project managers become more familiar and efficient, that percentage will decrease.

    ### Change Theories and Leadership Strategies

    For this section, you may wish to draw upon the research you did regarding change theories and leadership for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. The focus of this section is how those best practices will create buy-in for the project from an interdisciplinary team, improve their collaboration, and/or foster the team’s ability to implement the plan. Be sure that you are including at least one change theory and at least one leadership strategy in your explanation. Always remember to cite your sources; direct quotes require quotation marks and a page or paragraph number to be included in the citation.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the theory or strategy?

    · How will it likely help an interdisciplinary team to collaborate, implement, and/or buy in to the project plan?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation within the organizational context of the proposed plan, that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Team Collaboration Strategy

    In this section, begin by further defining the responsibilities and actions that represent the implementation of the plan. One strategy to defining this is to take a “
    _who_,
    _what_,
    _where_, and
    _when”_ approach for each team member.

    For example:

    ·
    _Project Manager A will apply the double-loop feedback model on one new product project for a single quarter._

    ·
    _Project Manager B will apply the double-loop feedback model on all new product projects for a quarter._

    _Vice President A will review the workloads of project managers using the double-loop feedback model every Thursday for one quarter._

    After you have roughly outlined the roles and responsibilities of team members, you will explain one or more collaborative approaches that will enable the team to work efficiently to achieve the plan’s objective. As with the change theories and leadership strategies, you may draw on the research you conducted for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. However, you are being asked to give a more in-depth explanation of the collaboration approaches and look at how they will help the theoretical interdisciplinary team in your plan proposal.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the collaboration approach?

    · What types of collaboration and teamwork will best help the interdisciplinary team be successful?

    · How is the collaboration approach relevant to the team’s needs and will it help drive success?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation in terms of the subject of the plan proposal; that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Required Organizational Resources

    For this section, you will be making rough estimates of the resources needed for your plan proposal to be successful. This section does not have to be exact, but the estimates should be realistic for the chosen organization. Items you should include or address in this section:

    · What are the staffing needs for your plan proposal?

    · What equipment or supplies are needed for your plan proposal?

    · Does the organization already have these?

    · If so, what are the rough financial implications associated with using these resources?

    · If not, what are the rough financial implications of acquiring these resources?

    · What access (to patients, departments, and so forth) is needed?

    · Are there any costs associated with these?

    · What are the overall financial implications for the plan proposal?

    · Staff time, resource use, resource acquisition, and access charged.

    After you have detailed your required resources, make sure that you explain any impacts on organizational resources that could happen if your plan is not undertaken and successful. In other words, if the issue you are trying to solve through your plan proposal persists or gets worse, what will be the potential costs to the organization?

    #### References

    Assignment should address the following:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain organizational resources, including financial, needed for a plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to address the improvements sought by the plan.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving a plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.

    · Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

    · Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format

    Assignment 3

    Create a 12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholders or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the previous assessment.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    ·
    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors**.

    There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:

    ·
    **Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.**

    · What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?

    · Why should the audience care about solving it?

    ·
    **Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.**

    · Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?

    · How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?

    ·
    **Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.**

    · What is the objective?

    · How likely is it to work?

    · What will the interdisciplinary team do?

    ·
    **Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.**

    · How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?

    · How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?

    · How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?

    ·
    **Part 5: Evaluation.**

    · What would a successful outcome of the project look like?

    · What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?

    · How could this be used to show the degree of success?

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    **APA formatting:** Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and notes pages, and your reference list are in current APA style.

    Competencies measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain how an interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which a project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

    **## four_parts.docx**

    **Assignment 2. Each assignment builds off each other.**

    Create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional colleague. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

    By interviewing a healthcare colleague of your choice, you will begin to gather information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing, or has experienced, in the workplace. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies that can be applied to address this problem.

    For this assessment, you will report on the information gathered during your interview. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from literature. The goal of this assessment is to analyze the interview data and identify an issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary solution. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently in use. Additionally, you will prepare for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assessment by researching change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to the issue you have identified.

    Interview Template

    ## **Interview Summary**

    Summarize your interview in this section. Be sure to relate concise information about:

    · The healthcare organization that was discussed in the interview.

    · The interviewee’s role and duties.

    · The relevant issues at the organization.

    · Any relevant comments on the actions taken by the organization or leadership previously and their effectiveness.

    · The organizational culture related to collaboration.

    · Any relevant collaboration or interdisciplinary team experience your interviewee has had.

    The goal of this section is to convey what was discussed at the interview and set yourself up to identify an issue to pursue in throughout the rest of this assessment (and future assessments in this course), as well as have enough information about the situation at the organization to relate theories, strategies, and approaches to.

    ## **Issue Identification**

    Identify the issue from the interview that you think an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach is appropriate. Provide one or more specific reasons why an interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate for the issue.

    ### **Change Theories That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    For this section look to the literature and describe one or more change theories that would help to develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the change theory?

    · How could it heal create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the theory to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Leadership Strategies That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    This section is similar to the previous one, except you will be looking to the literature to help you describe one or more leadership strategy that would help develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the leadership strategy?

    · How could it create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the strategy to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams**

    Again, this section will be similar to the previous one, except that the focus will be on collaboration approaches. Depending on if your interviewee’s organization makes frequent use of interdisciplinary teams or not, your focus in this section may be on how to establish interdisciplinary teams and a collaborative foundation or how to improve the collaboration within an already established team. You should also briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What are the best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature?

    · How could it help establish or improve collaboration?

    · How relevant is the approach to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    be sure to address the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a healthcare organization.

    · Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

    · Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help in developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

    · Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old

    **APA formatting:** Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

    Assignment 2

    Create a 3 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue identified in the second assessment.

    Use the context of the organization from your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific organizational or patient outcome based on the information gathered in your interview.

    ## Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

    Write a brief introduction (2–3 sentences) to your proposal that outlines the issue you are attempting to solve, the part of the organization in which the plan would be carried out, and the desired outcome. This will set the stage for the sections below.

    ### Objective

    Describe what your plan will do and what you hope it will accomplish in one or two succinct sentences. Also, comment on how the objective, if achieved, will improve organizational or patient outcomes

    _._

    ### Questions and Predictions

    For this section ask yourself 3–5 questions about your objective and your overall plan. Make a prediction for each question by answering the question you posed. This helps you to define the important aspects of your plan as well as limit the scope and check its ability to be implemented.

    For example:

    1.
    _How much time will using a double-loop feedback model add to a project manager’s workload?_

    a. At first, it will likely increase their workloads by 5 to 10 percent. However, as the process is refined and project managers become more familiar and efficient, that percentage will decrease.

    ### Change Theories and Leadership Strategies

    For this section, you may wish to draw upon the research you did regarding change theories and leadership for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. The focus of this section is how those best practices will create buy-in for the project from an interdisciplinary team, improve their collaboration, and/or foster the team’s ability to implement the plan. Be sure that you are including at least one change theory and at least one leadership strategy in your explanation. Always remember to cite your sources; direct quotes require quotation marks and a page or paragraph number to be included in the citation.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the theory or strategy?

    · How will it likely help an interdisciplinary team to collaborate, implement, and/or buy in to the project plan?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation within the organizational context of the proposed plan, that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Team Collaboration Strategy

    In this section, begin by further defining the responsibilities and actions that represent the implementation of the plan. One strategy to defining this is to take a “
    _who_,
    _what_,
    _where_, and
    _when”_ approach for each team member.

    For example:

    ·
    _Project Manager A will apply the double-loop feedback model on one new product project for a single quarter._

    ·
    _Project Manager B will apply the double-loop feedback model on all new product projects for a quarter._

    _Vice President A will review the workloads of project managers using the double-loop feedback model every Thursday for one quarter._

    After you have roughly outlined the roles and responsibilities of team members, you will explain one or more collaborative approaches that will enable the team to work efficiently to achieve the plan’s objective. As with the change theories and leadership strategies, you may draw on the research you conducted for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. However, you are being asked to give a more in-depth explanation of the collaboration approaches and look at how they will help the theoretical interdisciplinary team in your plan proposal.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the collaboration approach?

    · What types of collaboration and teamwork will best help the interdisciplinary team be successful?

    · How is the collaboration approach relevant to the team’s needs and will it help drive success?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation in terms of the subject of the plan proposal; that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Required Organizational Resources

    For this section, you will be making rough estimates of the resources needed for your plan proposal to be successful. This section does not have to be exact, but the estimates should be realistic for the chosen organization. Items you should include or address in this section:

    · What are the staffing needs for your plan proposal?

    · What equipment or supplies are needed for your plan proposal?

    · Does the organization already have these?

    · If so, what are the rough financial implications associated with using these resources?

    · If not, what are the rough financial implications of acquiring these resources?

    · What access (to patients, departments, and so forth) is needed?

    · Are there any costs associated with these?

    · What are the overall financial implications for the plan proposal?

    · Staff time, resource use, resource acquisition, and access charged.

    After you have detailed your required resources, make sure that you explain any impacts on organizational resources that could happen if your plan is not undertaken and successful. In other words, if the issue you are trying to solve through your plan proposal persists or gets worse, what will be the potential costs to the organization?

    #### References

    Assignment should address the following:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain organizational resources, including financial, needed for a plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to address the improvements sought by the plan.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving a plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.

    · Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

    · Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format

    Assignment 3

    Create a 12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholders or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the previous assessment.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    ·
    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors**.

    There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:

    ·
    **Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.**

    · What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?

    · Why should the audience care about solving it?

    ·
    **Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.**

    · Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?

    · How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?

    ·
    **Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.**

    · What is the objective?

    · How likely is it to work?

    · What will the interdisciplinary team do?

    ·
    **Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.**

    · How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?

    · How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?

    · How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?

    ·
    **Part 5: Evaluation.**

    · What would a successful outcome of the project look like?

    · What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?

    · How could this be used to show the degree of success?

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    **APA formatting:** Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and notes pages, and your reference list are in current APA style.

    Competencies measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain how an interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which a project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

  • [Solved] week 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering week 5.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Critiquing Sources of Error in Population Research to Address Gaps in Nursing Practice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WK6Discussion8310.docx **## WK6Discussion8310.docx** Critiquing Sources of Error in Population Research to Address Gaps in Nursing Practice ![A person in blue scrubs and glasses holding a clipboard AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/qu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK6Discussion8310.docx

    **## WK6Discussion8310.docx**

    Critiquing Sources of Error in Population Research to Address Gaps in Nursing Practice

    ![A person in blue scrubs and glasses holding a clipboard AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/critiquing-sources-of-error-in-population-research-to-address-gaps-in-nursing-practice-20895817)

    As a DNP-educated nurse, part of your role will be to identify the differences, or gaps, between current knowledge and practice and opportunities for improvement leading to an ideal state of practice. Being able to recognize and evaluate sources of error in population research is an important skill that can lead to better implementation of evidence-based practice.

    In order to effectively critique and apply population research to practice, you should be familiar with the following types of error:

    **Selection Bias**

    Selection bias in epidemiological studies occurs when study participants do not accurately represent the population for whom results will be generalized, and this results in a measure of association that is distorted (i.e., not close to the truth). For example, if persons responding to a survey tend to be different (e.g., younger) than those who do not respond, then the study sample is not representative of the general population, and study results may be misleading if generalized.

    **Information Bias**

    Information bias results from errors made in the collection of information obtained in a study. For example, participants’ self-report of their diet may be inaccurate for many reasons. They may not remember what they ate, or they may want to portray themselves as making healthier choices than they typically make. Regardless of the reason, the information collected is not accurate and therefore introduces bias into the analysis.

    **Confounding**

    Confounding occurs when a third variable is really responsible for the association you think you see between two other variables. For example, suppose researchers detect a relationship between consumption of alcohol and occurrence of lung cancer. The results of the study seem to indicate that consuming alcohol leads to a higher risk of developing lung cancer. However, when researchers take into account that people who drink alcohol are much more likely to smoke than those who do not, it becomes clear that the real association is between smoking and lung cancer and the reason that those who consume alcohol had a higher risk of lung cancer was because they were also more likely to be smokers. In this example, smoking was a confounder of the alcohol-lung cancer relationship.

    **Random Error**

    The previous three types of errors all fall under the category of
    _systematic errors_, which are reproducible errors having to do with flaws in study design, sampling, data collection, analysis, or interpretation.
    _Random errors_, on the other hand, are fluctuations in results that arise from naturally occurring differences in variables or samples. While unavoidable to a small degree even under the most careful research parameters, these types of errors can still affect the validity of studies.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/161210/modules/items/6261086)

    To Prepare:

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on how to recognize and distinguish selection bias, information bias, confounding, and random error in research studies.

    · Select a health issue and population relevant to your professional practice and a practice gap that may exist related to this issue.

    · Consider how each type of measurement error may influence data interpretation in epidemiologic literature and how you might apply the literature to address the identified practice gap.

    · Consider strategies you might use to recognize these errors and the implications they may have for addressing gaps in practice relevant to your selected issue.

    By Day 3 of Week 6

    **Post** a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

    · Describe your selected practice gap.

    · Explain how your treatment of this population/issue could be affected by having awareness of bias and confounding in epidemiologic literature.

    · Explain two strategies researchers can use to minimize these types of bias in studies, either through study design or analysis considerations.

    · Finally, explain the effects these biases could have on the interpretation of study results if not minimized

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK6Discussion8310.docx**

    Critiquing Sources of Error in Population Research to Address Gaps in Nursing Practice

    ![A person in blue scrubs and glasses holding a clipboard AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/critiquing-sources-of-error-in-population-research-to-address-gaps-in-nursing-practice-20895817)

    As a DNP-educated nurse, part of your role will be to identify the differences, or gaps, between current knowledge and practice and opportunities for improvement leading to an ideal state of practice. Being able to recognize and evaluate sources of error in population research is an important skill that can lead to better implementation of evidence-based practice.

    In order to effectively critique and apply population research to practice, you should be familiar with the following types of error:

    **Selection Bias**

    Selection bias in epidemiological studies occurs when study participants do not accurately represent the population for whom results will be generalized, and this results in a measure of association that is distorted (i.e., not close to the truth). For example, if persons responding to a survey tend to be different (e.g., younger) than those who do not respond, then the study sample is not representative of the general population, and study results may be misleading if generalized.

    **Information Bias**

    Information bias results from errors made in the collection of information obtained in a study. For example, participants’ self-report of their diet may be inaccurate for many reasons. They may not remember what they ate, or they may want to portray themselves as making healthier choices than they typically make. Regardless of the reason, the information collected is not accurate and therefore introduces bias into the analysis.

    **Confounding**

    Confounding occurs when a third variable is really responsible for the association you think you see between two other variables. For example, suppose researchers detect a relationship between consumption of alcohol and occurrence of lung cancer. The results of the study seem to indicate that consuming alcohol leads to a higher risk of developing lung cancer. However, when researchers take into account that people who drink alcohol are much more likely to smoke than those who do not, it becomes clear that the real association is between smoking and lung cancer and the reason that those who consume alcohol had a higher risk of lung cancer was because they were also more likely to be smokers. In this example, smoking was a confounder of the alcohol-lung cancer relationship.

    **Random Error**

    The previous three types of errors all fall under the category of
    _systematic errors_, which are reproducible errors having to do with flaws in study design, sampling, data collection, analysis, or interpretation.
    _Random errors_, on the other hand, are fluctuations in results that arise from naturally occurring differences in variables or samples. While unavoidable to a small degree even under the most careful research parameters, these types of errors can still affect the validity of studies.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/161210/modules/items/6261086)

    To Prepare:

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on how to recognize and distinguish selection bias, information bias, confounding, and random error in research studies.

    · Select a health issue and population relevant to your professional practice and a practice gap that may exist related to this issue.

    · Consider how each type of measurement error may influence data interpretation in epidemiologic literature and how you might apply the literature to address the identified practice gap.

    · Consider strategies you might use to recognize these errors and the implications they may have for addressing gaps in practice relevant to your selected issue.

    By Day 3 of Week 6

    **Post** a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

    · Describe your selected practice gap.

    · Explain how your treatment of this population/issue could be affected by having awareness of bias and confounding in epidemiologic literature.

    · Explain two strategies researchers can use to minimize these types of bias in studies, either through study design or analysis considerations.

    · Finally, explain the effects these biases could have on the interpretation of study results if not minimized

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] 2-2 Milestone One: Introduction

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow rubric verbatim ## What to Submit The draft of your introduction should be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Any references should be cited in APA format. Use appropriate headings to identify each crit…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow rubric verbatim

    ## What to Submit

    The draft of your introduction should be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Any references should be cited in APA format. Use appropriate headings to identify each critical element.

    – [\
    \
    rubric1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric1-pdf-10246141 "rubric1.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 2-1 Discussion: Peer Support Activity—Final Project Needs Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Begin your initial post with a one-sentence summary of your proposal topic. Then, identify why the topic you chose is important to the organization. Next, present specific evidence/data demonstrating the need for this proposal. Discuss any issues you encounter as you work on your draft of this secti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Begin your initial post with a one-sentence summary of your proposal topic. Then, identify why the topic you chose is important to the organization. Next, present specific evidence/data demonstrating the need for this proposal. Discuss any issues you encounter as you work on your draft of this section of your project. This discussion will help you complete Milestone Two, which is due in Module Three.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] DB Help!!

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering DB Help!!.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Lesson 8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    It is very important that community health nurses provide not only input to policy circles through advocacy but also leadership at decision-making tables. The community health nurse is reviewing an online in- service program on the importance of this role in providing an essential influence and uniq…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    It is very important that community health nurses

    provide not only input to policy circles through advocacy

    but also leadership at decision-making tables. The

    community health nurse is reviewing an online in-

    service program on the importance of this role in

    providing an essential influence and unique perspective

    in health care.

    1. Seasoned advocates have developed skills in

    influencing policy decisions. Some individuals

    use the “ten commandments of lobbying.” What

    are the basic ideas that are inherent to

    advocates?

    2. The community health nurse needs to know

    something about the forces shaping health policy

    and the policy process in order to be in a better

    position to influence policy outcomes. What are

    the three components of Kingdon’s framework

    for policy analysis?

    1. Answers must:
    – Be 100 words or more
    – Use the standard English grammar and spelling
    – References are cited (if necessary)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Scholarly P

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    My research focus as Family Nurse Practitioner is on reducing the proportion of adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) from moderate to mild anxiety in Plainfield, Illinois, so I'm considering the following variables: – Independent Variable: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention. -…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    My research focus as Family Nurse Practitioner is on reducing the proportion of adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) from moderate to mild anxiety in Plainfield, Illinois, so I'm considering the following variables:

    – Independent Variable: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention.
    – Dependent Variable: Anxiety severity level (measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7] scale).

    Discuss the windshield assessment assignment from attached paper. Create the Capstone Project Introduction, and the PICOT Statement based on Healthy People 2023 related to the 3 needs identified , in this assignment the literature review will be completed. Literature review of the topic (summarize at least 5 articles related to the topic). 5 pages apa 7th edition 6 references within 5 years.

    PICOT question is a structured way to formulate a clinical research question, using the acronym Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and sometimes Time.

    Literature review is a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of existing research on a specific topic, demonstrating your understanding of the field and justifying your research question or thesis.

    – [\
    \
    ScholarlyMajorPaperRubricSum23pk12.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/scholarlymajorpaperrubricsum23pk12-docx "ScholarlyMajorPaperRubricSum23pk12.docx")
    – [\
    \
    MentalHealthCommunityWinshieldSurveyAssessmentAssignmentInstructionsPlainfield1-2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mentalhealthcommunitywinshieldsurveyassessmentassignmentinstructionsplainfield1-2-docx "MentalHealthCommunityWinshieldSurveyAssessmentAssignmentInstructionsPlainfield1-2.docx")

    – 2 years ago