Tag: Education

[Solved] Education I need help with homework

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

I need help with my homework – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## RequiredResourcesforweek3assignment.docx – ## Writingisaformofcommunicationinwhichstudentscanexpresstheirthoughts.docx **## RequiredResourcesforweek3assignment.docx** **Required Resources** **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

I need help with my homework

– 2 years ago

**files (2)**

– ## RequiredResourcesforweek3assignment.docx

– ## Writingisaformofcommunicationinwhichstudentscanexpresstheirthoughts.docx

**## RequiredResourcesforweek3assignment.docx**

**Required Resources**

**Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

**Required**

Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
_Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

Tier 1 Core Writing Instruction

**Required**

Read “Tier 1 Core Writing Instruction,” by Brown, on the Illuminate Education website (2018).

https://www.illuminateed.com/blog/2018/04/tier-1-what-works-in-writing-instruction/

Teaching Students to Write Opinion Pieces Using a Dialogic Approach

**Required**

Read “Teaching Students to Write Opinion Pieces Using a Dialogic Approach,” by Reina and Clark, from
_Reading Teacher_

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=139350376&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

Teaching Writing to Diverse Student Populations

**Required**

Read “Teaching Writing to Diverse Student Populations” on the Reading Rockets website.

[https://www.readingrockets.org/to](https://www.readingrockets.org/to)

Developing Better Writers

**Required**

Read “Developing Better Writers,” by Gonser, located on the Edutopia website (2021).

https://www.edutopia.org/article/developing-better-writers

Work on Writing

**Required**

Explore “Work on Writing,” located on The DailyCafe website.

https://www.thedailycafe.com/daily-5/work-writing

10 EdTech Writing Tools for Students

**Required**

Explore “10 EdTech Writing Tools for Students,” located on the Planbook website.

https://blog.planbook.com/ed

**## Writingisaformofcommunicationinwhichstudentscanexpresstheirthoughts.docx**

Week 3 assignments

Writing is a form of communication in which students can express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions. There are a variety of purposes for writing, both formal and informal. Students need multiple exposures and scaffolded practice with the types of writing. Having a structure for writing lessons will help students be successful in the writing process and build essential skills needed to approach writing in all content areas.

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation (using the platform of your choice (e.g., PowerPoint, Google Slides) on writing instruction tailored for new teachers.
The first part of the presentation begins by covering the foundational knowledge essential for effective writing instruction. In the second part of the presentation, provide a brief sample writing lesson that demonstrates how to apply the foundational principles discussed in Part 1. Narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

**Part 1: Foundational Knowledge of Writing Instruction**

In your presentation include the following information:

· Describe the different types of writing (informational/explanatory, opinion/argumentative, and narrative).

· Explain how the writing standards and essential writing skills can be integrated into all content areas.

· Explain the writing process, including a technology tool that could be used to produce and publish student writing.

· Describe a minimum of two approaches/methods to teach writing (writers’ workshop, writing journals, Daily 5, language experience, etc.).

· Provide 2-3 strategies or tools, including technology, to creatively engage students in various forms of writing, the writing process, and to expand students’ communication through writing.

**Part 2: Writing Lesson**

Design a writing lesson outline to incorporate in your presentation based on an approach or method described in Part 1. Include the following in your writing lesson:

· National/State Standard and Learning Objective: Identify a writing standard and write an aligned learning objective. Include the full standard verbiage in your presentation to demonstrate alignment.

· Anticipatory Set: Describe an opening activity for the lesson that activates students’ prior knowledge, linking previous learning with what they will be learning in this lesson, and gaining student interest for the lesson.

· Activities: Explanation of how the content will be presented to students and how the teacher will engage the students in exploring, practicing, and applying the content. At least one activity should include technology to engage the students, expand their written communication skills, or provide support in the writing process.

· Assessment: Explanation of how students will demonstrate what they know or mastery of the learning objective.

· Differentiation: Provide one strategy to differentiate the writing lesson and assessment for each group of students (English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers).

**Part 3: Reflection in GoReact**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least two specific comments by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

There are two ways to access GoReact for this assignment. When accessing it through the calendar view, select the “Open Assignment” button to begin work. When accessing it through the Topic content, select the “Go to Assessment” button to begin work.

Remember, video and audio quality are important and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Support your presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a GoReact rubric. Before beginning the assignment, review the rubric to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.

**## Writingisaformofcommunicationinwhichstudentscanexpresstheirthoughts.docx**

Week 3 assignments

Writing is a form of communication in which students can express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions. There are a variety of purposes for writing, both formal and informal. Students need multiple exposures and scaffolded practice with the types of writing. Having a structure for writing lessons will help students be successful in the writing process and build essential skills needed to approach writing in all content areas.

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation (using the platform of your choice (e.g., PowerPoint, Google Slides) on writing instruction tailored for new teachers.
The first part of the presentation begins by covering the foundational knowledge essential for effective writing instruction. In the second part of the presentation, provide a brief sample writing lesson that demonstrates how to apply the foundational principles discussed in Part 1. Narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

**Part 1: Foundational Knowledge of Writing Instruction**

In your presentation include the following information:

· Describe the different types of writing (informational/explanatory, opinion/argumentative, and narrative).

· Explain how the writing standards and essential writing skills can be integrated into all content areas.

· Explain the writing process, including a technology tool that could be used to produce and publish student writing.

· Describe a minimum of two approaches/methods to teach writing (writers’ workshop, writing journals, Daily 5, language experience, etc.).

· Provide 2-3 strategies or tools, including technology, to creatively engage students in various forms of writing, the writing process, and to expand students’ communication through writing.

**Part 2: Writing Lesson**

Design a writing lesson outline to incorporate in your presentation based on an approach or method described in Part 1. Include the following in your writing lesson:

· National/State Standard and Learning Objective: Identify a writing standard and write an aligned learning objective. Include the full standard verbiage in your presentation to demonstrate alignment.

· Anticipatory Set: Describe an opening activity for the lesson that activates students’ prior knowledge, linking previous learning with what they will be learning in this lesson, and gaining student interest for the lesson.

· Activities: Explanation of how the content will be presented to students and how the teacher will engage the students in exploring, practicing, and applying the content. At least one activity should include technology to engage the students, expand their written communication skills, or provide support in the writing process.

· Assessment: Explanation of how students will demonstrate what they know or mastery of the learning objective.

· Differentiation: Provide one strategy to differentiate the writing lesson and assessment for each group of students (English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers).

**Part 3: Reflection in GoReact**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least two specific comments by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

There are two ways to access GoReact for this assignment. When accessing it through the calendar view, select the “Open Assignment” button to begin work. When accessing it through the Topic content, select the “Go to Assessment” button to begin work.

Remember, video and audio quality are important and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Support your presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a GoReact rubric. Before beginning the assignment, review the rubric to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.

**## RequiredResourcesforweek3assignment.docx**

**Required Resources**

**Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

**Required**

Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
_Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

Tier 1 Core Writing Instruction

**Required**

Read “Tier 1 Core Writing Instruction,” by Brown, on the Illuminate Education website (2018).

https://www.illuminateed.com/blog/2018/04/tier-1-what-works-in-writing-instruction/

Teaching Students to Write Opinion Pieces Using a Dialogic Approach

**Required**

Read “Teaching Students to Write Opinion Pieces Using a Dialogic Approach,” by Reina and Clark, from
_Reading Teacher_

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=139350376&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

Teaching Writing to Diverse Student Populations

**Required**

Read “Teaching Writing to Diverse Student Populations” on the Reading Rockets website.

[https://www.readingrockets.org/to](https://www.readingrockets.org/to)

Developing Better Writers

**Required**

Read “Developing Better Writers,” by Gonser, located on the Edutopia website (2021).

https://www.edutopia.org/article/developing-better-writers

Work on Writing

**Required**

Explore “Work on Writing,” located on The DailyCafe website.

https://www.thedailycafe.com/daily-5/work-writing

10 EdTech Writing Tools for Students

**Required**

Explore “10 EdTech Writing Tools for Students,” located on the Planbook website.

https://blog.planbook.com/ed

**## Writingisaformofcommunicationinwhichstudentscanexpresstheirthoughts.docx**

Week 3 assignments

Writing is a form of communication in which students can express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions. There are a variety of purposes for writing, both formal and informal. Students need multiple exposures and scaffolded practice with the types of writing. Having a structure for writing lessons will help students be successful in the writing process and build essential skills needed to approach writing in all content areas.

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation (using the platform of your choice (e.g., PowerPoint, Google Slides) on writing instruction tailored for new teachers.
The first part of the presentation begins by covering the foundational knowledge essential for effective writing instruction. In the second part of the presentation, provide a brief sample writing lesson that demonstrates how to apply the foundational principles discussed in Part 1. Narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

**Part 1: Foundational Knowledge of Writing Instruction**

In your presentation include the following information:

· Describe the different types of writing (informational/explanatory, opinion/argumentative, and narrative).

· Explain how the writing standards and essential writing skills can be integrated into all content areas.

· Explain the writing process, including a technology tool that could be used to produce and publish student writing.

· Describe a minimum of two approaches/methods to teach writing (writers’ workshop, writing journals, Daily 5, language experience, etc.).

· Provide 2-3 strategies or tools, including technology, to creatively engage students in various forms of writing, the writing process, and to expand students’ communication through writing.

**Part 2: Writing Lesson**

Design a writing lesson outline to incorporate in your presentation based on an approach or method described in Part 1. Include the following in your writing lesson:

· National/State Standard and Learning Objective: Identify a writing standard and write an aligned learning objective. Include the full standard verbiage in your presentation to demonstrate alignment.

· Anticipatory Set: Describe an opening activity for the lesson that activates students’ prior knowledge, linking previous learning with what they will be learning in this lesson, and gaining student interest for the lesson.

· Activities: Explanation of how the content will be presented to students and how the teacher will engage the students in exploring, practicing, and applying the content. At least one activity should include technology to engage the students, expand their written communication skills, or provide support in the writing process.

· Assessment: Explanation of how students will demonstrate what they know or mastery of the learning objective.

· Differentiation: Provide one strategy to differentiate the writing lesson and assessment for each group of students (English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers).

**Part 3: Reflection in GoReact**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least two specific comments by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

There are two ways to access GoReact for this assignment. When accessing it through the calendar view, select the “Open Assignment” button to begin work. When accessing it through the Topic content, select the “Go to Assessment” button to begin work.

Remember, video and audio quality are important and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Support your presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a GoReact rubric. Before beginning the assignment, review the rubric to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.

**## RequiredResourcesforweek3assignment.docx**

**Required Resources**

**Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

**Required**

Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
_Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

Tier 1 Core Writing Instruction

**Required**

Read “Tier 1 Core Writing Instruction,” by Brown, on the Illuminate Education website (2018).

https://www.illuminateed.com/blog/2018/04/tier-1-what-works-in-writing-instruction/

Teaching Students to Write Opinion Pieces Using a Dialogic Approach

**Required**

Read “Teaching Students to Write Opinion Pieces Using a Dialogic Approach,” by Reina and Clark, from
_Reading Teacher_

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=139350376&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

Teaching Writing to Diverse Student Populations

**Required**

Read “Teaching Writing to Diverse Student Populations” on the Reading Rockets website.

[https://www.readingrockets.org/to](https://www.readingrockets.org/to)

Developing Better Writers

**Required**

Read “Developing Better Writers,” by Gonser, located on the Edutopia website (2021).

https://www.edutopia.org/article/developing-better-writers

Work on Writing

**Required**

Explore “Work on Writing,” located on The DailyCafe website.

https://www.thedailycafe.com/daily-5/work-writing

10 EdTech Writing Tools for Students

**Required**

Explore “10 EdTech Writing Tools for Students,” located on the Planbook website.

https://blog.planbook.com/ed

**## Writingisaformofcommunicationinwhichstudentscanexpresstheirthoughts.docx**

Week 3 assignments

Writing is a form of communication in which students can express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions. There are a variety of purposes for writing, both formal and informal. Students need multiple exposures and scaffolded practice with the types of writing. Having a structure for writing lessons will help students be successful in the writing process and build essential skills needed to approach writing in all content areas.

Create a 10-12 slide digital presentation (using the platform of your choice (e.g., PowerPoint, Google Slides) on writing instruction tailored for new teachers.
The first part of the presentation begins by covering the foundational knowledge essential for effective writing instruction. In the second part of the presentation, provide a brief sample writing lesson that demonstrates how to apply the foundational principles discussed in Part 1. Narrate your presentation through GoReact by using the screen share function. You must have your camera on during the narrated presentation.

**Part 1: Foundational Knowledge of Writing Instruction**

In your presentation include the following information:

· Describe the different types of writing (informational/explanatory, opinion/argumentative, and narrative).

· Explain how the writing standards and essential writing skills can be integrated into all content areas.

· Explain the writing process, including a technology tool that could be used to produce and publish student writing.

· Describe a minimum of two approaches/methods to teach writing (writers’ workshop, writing journals, Daily 5, language experience, etc.).

· Provide 2-3 strategies or tools, including technology, to creatively engage students in various forms of writing, the writing process, and to expand students’ communication through writing.

**Part 2: Writing Lesson**

Design a writing lesson outline to incorporate in your presentation based on an approach or method described in Part 1. Include the following in your writing lesson:

· National/State Standard and Learning Objective: Identify a writing standard and write an aligned learning objective. Include the full standard verbiage in your presentation to demonstrate alignment.

· Anticipatory Set: Describe an opening activity for the lesson that activates students’ prior knowledge, linking previous learning with what they will be learning in this lesson, and gaining student interest for the lesson.

· Activities: Explanation of how the content will be presented to students and how the teacher will engage the students in exploring, practicing, and applying the content. At least one activity should include technology to engage the students, expand their written communication skills, or provide support in the writing process.

· Assessment: Explanation of how students will demonstrate what they know or mastery of the learning objective.

· Differentiation: Provide one strategy to differentiate the writing lesson and assessment for each group of students (English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers).

**Part 3: Reflection in GoReact**

Once you post your narrated presentation, you will see it on the GoReact dashboard. Enter the playback screen by clicking the thumbnail. Watch the video and make at least two specific comments by bookmarking and making a comment explaining where you see the following:

· Biggest strength of your presentation and delivery

· A place where you could improve your presentation and delivery to help you grow as a future educator

There are two ways to access GoReact for this assignment. When accessing it through the calendar view, select the “Open Assignment” button to begin work. When accessing it through the Topic content, select the “Go to Assessment” button to begin work.

Remember, video and audio quality are important and should be taken into consideration. Ensure your video is filmed with sufficient lighting and the volume is adequate for viewers to hear. Intonation, expression, proper speech, and professional attire are expected.

Support your presentation with 2-3 scholarly resources.

While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a GoReact rubric. Before beginning the assignment, review the rubric to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] des

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

**Prompt**: Please briefly describe those global transformations from the late 1970s through the 1980s that had a direct impact on the Cold War and explain in detail and depth how and why they contributed to its demise. **A clue**: One major change took place in the Soviet Union and China, where bot…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Prompt**: Please briefly describe those global transformations from the late 1970s through the 1980s that had a direct impact on the Cold War and explain in detail and depth how and why they contributed to its demise.

**A clue**: One major change took place in the Soviet Union and China, where both countries began to reform their economies, moving away from the planned model toward a market-oriented model. In the Soviet Union, Gorbachev even moved to democratize the government through political reform. You should also consider the U.S. factor. Still, you can discuss how the general global trend toward market capitalism and democracy influenced the Cold War.

**A reminder**: Things are often complex and cannot be understood in simple black-and-white terms. You should try to give a historically informed, ideologically unbiased, and logically coherent answer. The historical context cannot be overemphasized. It is easy to dwell on generalities out of context. It is also easy to see things from one’s own ideological perspective and rush to condemn alternative ideologies without trying to understand them. You can always disagree but should show respect. It is more important to help contribute to a greater understanding of different systems, which all had their historical, cultural, economic, and political rationales. Finally, it is easier to speak coherently, but a lot more difficult to write coherently. Make sure that you move logically from sentence to sentence and consistently from paragraph to paragraph. Do not deviate from your focus. Whatever you write should be directly relevant to the prompt. There is no need for long background introduction.

– 2 years ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] questions

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference – [\ \ Questions4-22.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions4-22-docx "Questions4-22.docx") – 2 years ago

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference

– [\
\
Questions4-22.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions4-22-docx "Questions4-22.docx")

– 2 years ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] white week 3

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Class: Information and Digital Literacy • Topic: o Choose a topic that is realistic and one that you want to learn more about. o The topic might be a career field you want to go into or something else that deeply interests you. • Scope and value: o What is the scope of the topic and your research? o…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Class: Information and Digital Literacy

• Topic:

o Choose a topic that is realistic and one that you want to learn more about.

o The topic might be a career field you want to go into or something else that deeply interests you.

• Scope and value:

o What is the scope of the topic and your research?

o What value does it bring to your life? To your professional life?

• Communication medium:

o How are you going to communicate your project?

o How will you make your presentation different and unique?

• Critical thinking questions:

o Pose different questions that will help you with your research and investigate your topic in more depth.

o Post critical questions that will push you to improve.

• Subtopics (optional).

• Brainstorming (optional).

Part II: Reflective Paragraph

Part II is a reflective paragraph that represents your critical thinking process when thinking about possible sources and your research. You are NOT looking for specific sources now. Consider the best possible sources as presented in the week 2 Lesson. What type of sources will work best for your research? How can you support your project plan with credible, current, reliable, accurate, and relevant information?

.

– 2 years ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] tasha 2

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Note that references for your research must be peer-reviewed/scholarly journals. These journals typically have the following characteristics: 1. a panel of experts reviews articles before they are accepted for publication; 2. a scholar or specialist in the field writes articles; 3. articles repor…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Note that references for your research must be peer-reviewed/scholarly journals. These journals typically have the following characteristics:

1. a panel of experts reviews articles before they are accepted for publication;

2. a scholar or specialist in the field writes articles;

3. articles report on original research or experimentation;

4. are often published by professional associations;

5. utilize terminology associated with the discipline.

Newspapers, magazines, and similar periodicals must be used sparingly and are acceptable only as sources of supplementary information.

References like Wikipedia, Psychology Today, and Court TV are not primary sources, are not peer-reviewed (reviewed for empirical integrity, accuracy, and authenticity), and are not appropriate for scholarly writing (with the possible exception of use for anecdotal background information).

This assignment is a criminal profiling research . The student will pick a high-profile criminal listed on the assignment page and explain the biological, situational, and developmental factors contributing to this criminal's behavior, including geographic mobility, victimology, and M.O./signature.

**Examples of Possible Criminal Profiles**

David Berkowitz (son of sam)

Dennis Rader (BTK)

Ted Bundy

Jeffry Dahmer

Albert Fish

John Wayne Gacy

Aileen Wuornos

Make sure you provide the following:

1. Give a thorough description of the criminal's background (life story).

2. Utilize course material to explain the criminal's behavior to include geographical mobility, victimology, modus operandi, and signature

3. Discuss how psychological theories and research contributed to this criminal's apprehension, prosecution, understanding and/or treatment.

– 2 years ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] tasha

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Choose one of the following topics relevant to evidence and procedures: 1. Documentation, collection, and preservation of DNA evidence 2. The pros and cons of relying on modus operandi and signature in a serial homicide investigation. 3. Discuss bitemark examinations, document examinations, and mic…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Choose one of the following topics relevant to evidence and procedures:

1. Documentation, collection, and preservation of DNA evidence

2. The pros and cons of relying on modus operandi and signature in a serial homicide investigation.

3. Discuss bitemark examinations, document examinations, and microscopic hair examinations and exactly why each is now considered "junk science".

4. Discuss the impact of visual aids in the courtroom and how they assist in explaining forensic science to the jury. Provide examples drawing from specific forensic disciplines such as fingerprint analysis or ballistics.

5. Discuss the different methods of documenting and searching a crime scene. What are the pros and cons of relying on 3D imaging systems?

Remember that statistics, studies and case examples add depth to your writing.

– 2 years ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] felton

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

## Assignment Directions: For this assignment, you will create an engaging and informative 1-to-2-minute public service announcement (PSA) video or audio recording or a flyer. The goal is to educate the public about 3 of the most important actions individuals can take to prevent the transmission of …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

## Assignment Directions:

For this assignment, you will create an engaging and informative 1-to-2-minute public service announcement (PSA) video or audio recording or a flyer. The goal is to educate the public about 3 of the most important actions individuals can take to prevent the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

This PSA assignment allows you to synthesize research on STI prevention into a concise, educational public awareness campaign. An effective PSA compellingly conveys need-to-know information in a way that resonates with the intended audience.

##### Directions:

1. Research the major modes of transmission for common STIs like HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, etc. Identify 3 key prevention strategies that resonate as the most crucial for your chosen audience to know.
2. Decide on the format for your PSA – will it be a video, flyer/poster, or audio recording? Keep your audience in mind.
3. Write a persuasive script or design the visual elements for your PSA content highlighting the 3 STI prevention actions you selected. Some examples could include:
– Using condoms/barriers correctly
– Getting tested regularly
– Having open conversations with partners
– Knowing your status
– Avoiding risky behaviors
4. Create your final digital PSA product, keeping it concise, educational, and focused on your 3 main prevention points. Be creative!
5. For video/audio PSAs: Record your final PSA and edit it as needed. Length should be 1 to 2 minutes.
6. For a flyer/poster: Design a clear, visually appealing layout with your prevention messaging.
7. Include a brief 1-paragraph explanation summarizing your creative approach and target audience.
8. Include a reference page showing the sources for the material used in your Public Service Announcement.

– 2 years ago

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Ethical Decisions In Healthcare

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## EthicalDecisonsinHealthCare.docx – ## EthicalDecisionsinHealthCareRubric.pdf **## EthicalDecisonsinHealthCare.docx** Your health care team is presented with the following case: A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while a…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– 2 years ago

**files (2)**

– ## EthicalDecisonsinHealthCare.docx

– ## EthicalDecisionsinHealthCareRubric.pdf

**## EthicalDecisonsinHealthCare.docx**

Your health care team is presented with the following case:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission from the parents to initiate treatment. Both parents are Christian Scientists, and they insist that no medical treatment be given to the child. The physician initiates treatment anyway, and the parents later sue the physician and the hospital.

In a formal, written paper of 1,250-1,500 words, provide the following:

1. Explain the ethical dilemma portrayed in this case and how Uustal's "Ethical Decision-Making Model" can assist in navigating the situation.

2. Describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations of each of the following health care stakeholders: (a) child, (b) parent, (c) physician, (d) health care staff, (e) hospital, (f) administrator, and (g) attorney.

3. Summarize potentially conflicting values and principles that exist in this case based upon ethical theories and principles you have learned in this course.

4. Assuming the role of the hospital administrator, provide a solution to resolve the identified ethical dilemma in this case.

Here are some articles you can use:

a. Applying Kidder’s Ethical Decision-Making Model

b. Box 9.5 Clinical Ethical Decision-Making Model

c. Ethical Decision Making for Nurses Treating Acute Pain in Patients with Opioid Abuse History

d. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Research Studies

e. Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles

f. Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research

g. Should We Worry About the Possible Framing Effect of Ethical Theories?

h. The Ethic of Care: A Christian Perspective

**## EthicalDecisionsinHealthCareRubric.pdf**

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Decisions in Health Care – Rubric

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model

of Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can be

applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can

be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately explain how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of

Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

Collapse All

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care

Stakeholders
16.2 points

Criteria Description

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care Stakeholders

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and

expectations of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital,

administrator, and attorney.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a

child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child, parent,

physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child,

parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations

of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in

the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately summarize potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma 16.2 points

Criteria Description

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical

dilemma in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital

administrator.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately provide a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma

in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Thesis Development and Purpose 6.3 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent 6.3 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good 5.35 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory 4.73 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.1 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Argument Logic and Construction 7.2 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent 7.2 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good 6.12 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory 5.4 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

sources.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,

language use)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 3.82 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and

assignment)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good 3.82 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

style.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

followed correctly.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 3.82 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 90 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

**## EthicalDecisionsinHealthCareRubric.pdf**

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Decisions in Health Care – Rubric

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model

of Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can be

applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can

be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately explain how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of

Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

Collapse All

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care

Stakeholders
16.2 points

Criteria Description

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care Stakeholders

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and

expectations of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital,

administrator, and attorney.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a

child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child, parent,

physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child,

parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations

of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in

the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately summarize potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma 16.2 points

Criteria Description

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical

dilemma in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital

administrator.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately provide a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma

in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Thesis Development and Purpose 6.3 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent 6.3 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good 5.35 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory 4.73 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.1 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Argument Logic and Construction 7.2 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent 7.2 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good 6.12 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory 5.4 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

sources.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,

language use)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 3.82 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and

assignment)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good 3.82 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

style.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

followed correctly.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 3.82 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 90 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

**## EthicalDecisonsinHealthCare.docx**

Your health care team is presented with the following case:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission from the parents to initiate treatment. Both parents are Christian Scientists, and they insist that no medical treatment be given to the child. The physician initiates treatment anyway, and the parents later sue the physician and the hospital.

In a formal, written paper of 1,250-1,500 words, provide the following:

1. Explain the ethical dilemma portrayed in this case and how Uustal's "Ethical Decision-Making Model" can assist in navigating the situation.

2. Describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations of each of the following health care stakeholders: (a) child, (b) parent, (c) physician, (d) health care staff, (e) hospital, (f) administrator, and (g) attorney.

3. Summarize potentially conflicting values and principles that exist in this case based upon ethical theories and principles you have learned in this course.

4. Assuming the role of the hospital administrator, provide a solution to resolve the identified ethical dilemma in this case.

Here are some articles you can use:

a. Applying Kidder’s Ethical Decision-Making Model

b. Box 9.5 Clinical Ethical Decision-Making Model

c. Ethical Decision Making for Nurses Treating Acute Pain in Patients with Opioid Abuse History

d. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Research Studies

e. Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles

f. Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research

g. Should We Worry About the Possible Framing Effect of Ethical Theories?

h. The Ethic of Care: A Christian Perspective

**## EthicalDecisionsinHealthCareRubric.pdf**

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Decisions in Health Care – Rubric

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model

of Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can be

applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can

be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately explain how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of

Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

Collapse All

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care

Stakeholders
16.2 points

Criteria Description

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care Stakeholders

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and

expectations of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital,

administrator, and attorney.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a

child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child, parent,

physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child,

parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations

of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in

the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately summarize potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma 16.2 points

Criteria Description

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical

dilemma in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital

administrator.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately provide a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma

in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Thesis Development and Purpose 6.3 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent 6.3 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good 5.35 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory 4.73 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.1 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Argument Logic and Construction 7.2 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent 7.2 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good 6.12 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory 5.4 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

sources.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,

language use)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 3.82 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and

assignment)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good 3.82 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

style.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

followed correctly.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 3.82 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 90 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

**## EthicalDecisonsinHealthCare.docx**

Your health care team is presented with the following case:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission from the parents to initiate treatment. Both parents are Christian Scientists, and they insist that no medical treatment be given to the child. The physician initiates treatment anyway, and the parents later sue the physician and the hospital.

In a formal, written paper of 1,250-1,500 words, provide the following:

1. Explain the ethical dilemma portrayed in this case and how Uustal's "Ethical Decision-Making Model" can assist in navigating the situation.

2. Describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations of each of the following health care stakeholders: (a) child, (b) parent, (c) physician, (d) health care staff, (e) hospital, (f) administrator, and (g) attorney.

3. Summarize potentially conflicting values and principles that exist in this case based upon ethical theories and principles you have learned in this course.

4. Assuming the role of the hospital administrator, provide a solution to resolve the identified ethical dilemma in this case.

Here are some articles you can use:

a. Applying Kidder’s Ethical Decision-Making Model

b. Box 9.5 Clinical Ethical Decision-Making Model

c. Ethical Decision Making for Nurses Treating Acute Pain in Patients with Opioid Abuse History

d. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Research Studies

e. Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles

f. Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research

g. Should We Worry About the Possible Framing Effect of Ethical Theories?

h. The Ethic of Care: A Christian Perspective

**## EthicalDecisionsinHealthCareRubric.pdf**

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Decisions in Health Care – Rubric

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model

of Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal

can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can be

applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely explains how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of Uustal can

be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately explain how the Ethical Decision-Making Model of

Uustal can be applied to navigate the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario.

Collapse All

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care

Stakeholders
16.2 points

Criteria Description

The Perspectives, Needs, and Expectations of Health Care Stakeholders

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and

expectations of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital,

administrator, and attorney.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a

child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child, parent,

physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely describes the perspectives, needs, and expectations of a child,

parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and attorney.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately describe the perspectives, needs, and expectations

of a child, parent, physician, health care staff, hospital, administrator, and

attorney.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario 15.3 points

Criteria Description

Potentially Conflicting Values and Principles in the Scenario

5. Excellent 15.3 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4. Good 13.01 points

Essay thoroughly summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in

the presented scenario.

3. Satisfactory 11.48 points

Essay summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 9.95 points

Essay vaguely summarizes potentially conflicting values and principles in the

presented scenario.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately summarize potentially conflicting values and

principles in the presented scenario.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma 16.2 points

Criteria Description

Solution to the Ethical Dilemma

5. Excellent 16.2 points

Essay clearly and thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical

dilemma in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital

administrator.

4. Good 13.77 points

Essay thoroughly provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

3. Satisfactory 12.15 points

Essay provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the presented

scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.53 points

Essay vaguely provides a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma in the

presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay does not adequately provide a solution to resolve the ethical dilemma

in the presented scenario from the perspective of a hospital administrator.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Thesis Development and Purpose 6.3 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent 6.3 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good 5.35 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is

descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory 4.73 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.1 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Argument Logic and Construction 7.2 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent 7.2 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive

and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good 6.12 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are

evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to

conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory 5.4 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument

presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not

thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction

and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.

There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable

credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does

not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible

sources.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,

language use)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 3.82 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-

appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies

in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is

correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and

assignment)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good 3.82 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting

style.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor

errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A

lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

followed correctly.

4/21/25, 2:39 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 3.82 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 90 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

November 5, 2026
[Solved] ELL 515

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering ELL 515.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Catherine Owens Blank Bid

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Catherine Owens Blank Bid.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026