My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] SLP 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Module2SLP.docx – ## Module2-Resources.docx **## Module2SLP.docx** **Module 2 – SLP** **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity** **Assignment** When business improves for your organization, the company plans to build a facility in Detroit, MI. Research and explain th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Module2SLP.docx

    – ## Module2-Resources.docx

    **## Module2SLP.docx**

    **Module 2 – SLP**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Assignment**

    When business improves for your organization, the company plans to build a facility in Detroit, MI. Research and explain the following in an essay format which includes an introduction and conclusion (not a Q & A format):

    · The demographic characteristics of the Detroit labor market. Would the company find the diversity and the skill levels needed to build its technology component? Discuss. If not, where is the closest location to Detroit you would recommend and why?

    **References:**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/) (https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](https://www.census.gov/data.html) – https://www.census.gov/data.html

    [_QuickFacts – Detroit city, Michigan_](https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/detroitcitymichigan) – https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/detroitcitymichigan

    **Note**: These are both national databases. Also check with the state department of labor and other sources for information.

    For this SLP assignment utilize
    **at least 2 sources from the Trident Online Library** to help strengthen and validate your discussion.

    Make reasonable, cost-effective assumptions in your paper, if needed.  State your assumptions in the beginning of your discussion.

    **Paper length: 2 to 3 pages** (not counting the cover and reference pages).

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the
    _Background_ page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the
    _References_ page?

    ·
    **Timeliness**: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

    **## Module2-Resources.docx**

    **Module 2 – Resources**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Job Analysis**

    Before we turn to a discussion of the staffing function, EEO, and diversity, let us look at the process called “job analysis” (sometimes called “job study”). Job analysis is what should happen before an organization hires employees. We know, though, that it sometimes is not a systematic process that occurs to develop jobs, but instead a haphazard one. HRM professionals realize, however, that job analysis is supposed to be a systematic procedure to identify and analyze the level of a job and what its profile should look like.

    The information gathered during a job analysis process is valuable to decide job design, write job descriptions, determine job qualifications, and identify job worth (how much the job contributes to the organization). All of the other HRM functions—for example, recruitment and selection, training and development, wage and salary administration, and performance management—should begin with accurate, up-to-date information gained from studying a job.

    Please note that the links below will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscription to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.

    [_Human Resources: Strategic Workforce Planning_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505571&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    [_The selection process_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505572&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    As we can see from the above, it is safe to say that the entire success of HRM is based on an effective job analysis process that is the foundation of the staffing function and the many HRM functions that follow.

    **Equal Employment Opportunity:**

    Equal employment opportunity is a large field of study within human resource management. (Our MGT516 course focuses on EEO.) But more than that, it is the law of the land and provides regulations private-sector employers must follow.

    Because human resource actions affect organization-wide policies and procedures, they often deal with the selection of employees for jobs, promotions, training programs, pay and benefits, layoffs, employee discipline, and discharge. Whenever one employee/applicant is selected over another for whatever reason, there are possible EEO concerns.

    EEO involves many different areas to study, including discrimination and affirmative action.

    The keystone of each organization’s defense in protecting itself against any type of employee relations law violations, charges, and claims is a clear, unambiguous written company policy stating the company’s support and intention to closely adhere to the provisions of employment law. But the process does not stop there.

    Actions are also important. What do the company’s statistics show on the numbers of minorities, women, and disabled persons in its workforce? And importantly, what are the company’s actions related to nurturing the diversity that they have been able to achieve?

    The global nature of our current environment means that many of us work alongside others who have backgrounds different than our own. The ability to effectively consider all employee contributions provides organizations with a competitive advantage.

    It is easy to see, then, that the most successful companies actually manage and nurture the diversity in their organizations.

    It is not enough to merely meet EEO hiring quotas. The goal of these successful organizations is to do all they can to allow all employees to contribute to the organization’s goals and to experience their own personal growth.

    Managing diversity often includes changing the company culture. Employees need to feel comfortable working in their work environments.

    Finish this module by reading the following:

    Marshall, P. (2010, April). Taking action on diversity.
    _The Canadian Manager, 35_(1), 17-18,3. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    **Other Required Sources for Module 2:**

    Juneja, P. (n.d.).
    [_Job analysis and human resource planning._](https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm) Management Study Guide. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm

    The use of this material from Managementstudyguide.com is free for learning and education purpose.

    Jusko, J. (2011). Cutting costs without cutting people.
    _Industry Week, 260_(4), 30-n/a. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Reed, S. M. (2017). Chapter 3: Workforce planning and employment. In
    _A Guide to the Human Resource Body of Knowledge_ (HRBoK). HRCI, John Wiley & Son. Available in the Trident Online Library SkillSoft Books database.

    **SLP**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/)(https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml) (http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml).

    **Optional Sources for Module 2:**

    Fox, A. (2011, May). Mixing it up.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 22-27. Retrieve from ProQuest in the Trident online library.

    [_Job analysis background research_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/223276-MGT509-2025APR07FT-1/Job%20Analysis%20Background%20Research.ppt?_&d2lSessionVal=KAfHkzqdWXxZVHXPxWpnaXGIv&ou=104372&ou=223276) [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://uwf.edu/search/index.html?q=job+analysis+background+research

    Management Study Guide. (2016).
    [_Approaches to job design_](http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm). Retrieved from http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm

    Owens, D. (2011, May). Bank on diverse talent.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 32-33. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Perrett, B. (2013). Halving labor costs.
    _Aviation Week & Space Technology, 175_(31), 52. Retrieved from EBSCOhost in the Trident Online Library.

    **## Module2-Resources.docx**

    **Module 2 – Resources**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Job Analysis**

    Before we turn to a discussion of the staffing function, EEO, and diversity, let us look at the process called “job analysis” (sometimes called “job study”). Job analysis is what should happen before an organization hires employees. We know, though, that it sometimes is not a systematic process that occurs to develop jobs, but instead a haphazard one. HRM professionals realize, however, that job analysis is supposed to be a systematic procedure to identify and analyze the level of a job and what its profile should look like.

    The information gathered during a job analysis process is valuable to decide job design, write job descriptions, determine job qualifications, and identify job worth (how much the job contributes to the organization). All of the other HRM functions—for example, recruitment and selection, training and development, wage and salary administration, and performance management—should begin with accurate, up-to-date information gained from studying a job.

    Please note that the links below will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscription to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.

    [_Human Resources: Strategic Workforce Planning_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505571&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    [_The selection process_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505572&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    As we can see from the above, it is safe to say that the entire success of HRM is based on an effective job analysis process that is the foundation of the staffing function and the many HRM functions that follow.

    **Equal Employment Opportunity:**

    Equal employment opportunity is a large field of study within human resource management. (Our MGT516 course focuses on EEO.) But more than that, it is the law of the land and provides regulations private-sector employers must follow.

    Because human resource actions affect organization-wide policies and procedures, they often deal with the selection of employees for jobs, promotions, training programs, pay and benefits, layoffs, employee discipline, and discharge. Whenever one employee/applicant is selected over another for whatever reason, there are possible EEO concerns.

    EEO involves many different areas to study, including discrimination and affirmative action.

    The keystone of each organization’s defense in protecting itself against any type of employee relations law violations, charges, and claims is a clear, unambiguous written company policy stating the company’s support and intention to closely adhere to the provisions of employment law. But the process does not stop there.

    Actions are also important. What do the company’s statistics show on the numbers of minorities, women, and disabled persons in its workforce? And importantly, what are the company’s actions related to nurturing the diversity that they have been able to achieve?

    The global nature of our current environment means that many of us work alongside others who have backgrounds different than our own. The ability to effectively consider all employee contributions provides organizations with a competitive advantage.

    It is easy to see, then, that the most successful companies actually manage and nurture the diversity in their organizations.

    It is not enough to merely meet EEO hiring quotas. The goal of these successful organizations is to do all they can to allow all employees to contribute to the organization’s goals and to experience their own personal growth.

    Managing diversity often includes changing the company culture. Employees need to feel comfortable working in their work environments.

    Finish this module by reading the following:

    Marshall, P. (2010, April). Taking action on diversity.
    _The Canadian Manager, 35_(1), 17-18,3. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    **Other Required Sources for Module 2:**

    Juneja, P. (n.d.).
    [_Job analysis and human resource planning._](https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm) Management Study Guide. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm

    The use of this material from Managementstudyguide.com is free for learning and education purpose.

    Jusko, J. (2011). Cutting costs without cutting people.
    _Industry Week, 260_(4), 30-n/a. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Reed, S. M. (2017). Chapter 3: Workforce planning and employment. In
    _A Guide to the Human Resource Body of Knowledge_ (HRBoK). HRCI, John Wiley & Son. Available in the Trident Online Library SkillSoft Books database.

    **SLP**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/)(https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml) (http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml).

    **Optional Sources for Module 2:**

    Fox, A. (2011, May). Mixing it up.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 22-27. Retrieve from ProQuest in the Trident online library.

    [_Job analysis background research_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/223276-MGT509-2025APR07FT-1/Job%20Analysis%20Background%20Research.ppt?_&d2lSessionVal=KAfHkzqdWXxZVHXPxWpnaXGIv&ou=104372&ou=223276) [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://uwf.edu/search/index.html?q=job+analysis+background+research

    Management Study Guide. (2016).
    [_Approaches to job design_](http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm). Retrieved from http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm

    Owens, D. (2011, May). Bank on diverse talent.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 32-33. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Perrett, B. (2013). Halving labor costs.
    _Aviation Week & Space Technology, 175_(31), 52. Retrieved from EBSCOhost in the Trident Online Library.

    **## Module2SLP.docx**

    **Module 2 – SLP**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Assignment**

    When business improves for your organization, the company plans to build a facility in Detroit, MI. Research and explain the following in an essay format which includes an introduction and conclusion (not a Q & A format):

    · The demographic characteristics of the Detroit labor market. Would the company find the diversity and the skill levels needed to build its technology component? Discuss. If not, where is the closest location to Detroit you would recommend and why?

    **References:**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/) (https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](https://www.census.gov/data.html) – https://www.census.gov/data.html

    [_QuickFacts – Detroit city, Michigan_](https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/detroitcitymichigan) – https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/detroitcitymichigan

    **Note**: These are both national databases. Also check with the state department of labor and other sources for information.

    For this SLP assignment utilize
    **at least 2 sources from the Trident Online Library** to help strengthen and validate your discussion.

    Make reasonable, cost-effective assumptions in your paper, if needed.  State your assumptions in the beginning of your discussion.

    **Paper length: 2 to 3 pages** (not counting the cover and reference pages).

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the
    _Background_ page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the
    _References_ page?

    ·
    **Timeliness**: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

    **## Module2-Resources.docx**

    **Module 2 – Resources**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Job Analysis**

    Before we turn to a discussion of the staffing function, EEO, and diversity, let us look at the process called “job analysis” (sometimes called “job study”). Job analysis is what should happen before an organization hires employees. We know, though, that it sometimes is not a systematic process that occurs to develop jobs, but instead a haphazard one. HRM professionals realize, however, that job analysis is supposed to be a systematic procedure to identify and analyze the level of a job and what its profile should look like.

    The information gathered during a job analysis process is valuable to decide job design, write job descriptions, determine job qualifications, and identify job worth (how much the job contributes to the organization). All of the other HRM functions—for example, recruitment and selection, training and development, wage and salary administration, and performance management—should begin with accurate, up-to-date information gained from studying a job.

    Please note that the links below will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscription to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.

    [_Human Resources: Strategic Workforce Planning_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505571&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    [_The selection process_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505572&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    As we can see from the above, it is safe to say that the entire success of HRM is based on an effective job analysis process that is the foundation of the staffing function and the many HRM functions that follow.

    **Equal Employment Opportunity:**

    Equal employment opportunity is a large field of study within human resource management. (Our MGT516 course focuses on EEO.) But more than that, it is the law of the land and provides regulations private-sector employers must follow.

    Because human resource actions affect organization-wide policies and procedures, they often deal with the selection of employees for jobs, promotions, training programs, pay and benefits, layoffs, employee discipline, and discharge. Whenever one employee/applicant is selected over another for whatever reason, there are possible EEO concerns.

    EEO involves many different areas to study, including discrimination and affirmative action.

    The keystone of each organization’s defense in protecting itself against any type of employee relations law violations, charges, and claims is a clear, unambiguous written company policy stating the company’s support and intention to closely adhere to the provisions of employment law. But the process does not stop there.

    Actions are also important. What do the company’s statistics show on the numbers of minorities, women, and disabled persons in its workforce? And importantly, what are the company’s actions related to nurturing the diversity that they have been able to achieve?

    The global nature of our current environment means that many of us work alongside others who have backgrounds different than our own. The ability to effectively consider all employee contributions provides organizations with a competitive advantage.

    It is easy to see, then, that the most successful companies actually manage and nurture the diversity in their organizations.

    It is not enough to merely meet EEO hiring quotas. The goal of these successful organizations is to do all they can to allow all employees to contribute to the organization’s goals and to experience their own personal growth.

    Managing diversity often includes changing the company culture. Employees need to feel comfortable working in their work environments.

    Finish this module by reading the following:

    Marshall, P. (2010, April). Taking action on diversity.
    _The Canadian Manager, 35_(1), 17-18,3. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    **Other Required Sources for Module 2:**

    Juneja, P. (n.d.).
    [_Job analysis and human resource planning._](https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm) Management Study Guide. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm

    The use of this material from Managementstudyguide.com is free for learning and education purpose.

    Jusko, J. (2011). Cutting costs without cutting people.
    _Industry Week, 260_(4), 30-n/a. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Reed, S. M. (2017). Chapter 3: Workforce planning and employment. In
    _A Guide to the Human Resource Body of Knowledge_ (HRBoK). HRCI, John Wiley & Son. Available in the Trident Online Library SkillSoft Books database.

    **SLP**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/)(https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml) (http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml).

    **Optional Sources for Module 2:**

    Fox, A. (2011, May). Mixing it up.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 22-27. Retrieve from ProQuest in the Trident online library.

    [_Job analysis background research_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/223276-MGT509-2025APR07FT-1/Job%20Analysis%20Background%20Research.ppt?_&d2lSessionVal=KAfHkzqdWXxZVHXPxWpnaXGIv&ou=104372&ou=223276) [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://uwf.edu/search/index.html?q=job+analysis+background+research

    Management Study Guide. (2016).
    [_Approaches to job design_](http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm). Retrieved from http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm

    Owens, D. (2011, May). Bank on diverse talent.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 32-33. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Perrett, B. (2013). Halving labor costs.
    _Aviation Week & Space Technology, 175_(31), 52. Retrieved from EBSCOhost in the Trident Online Library.

    **## Module2SLP.docx**

    **Module 2 – SLP**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Assignment**

    When business improves for your organization, the company plans to build a facility in Detroit, MI. Research and explain the following in an essay format which includes an introduction and conclusion (not a Q & A format):

    · The demographic characteristics of the Detroit labor market. Would the company find the diversity and the skill levels needed to build its technology component? Discuss. If not, where is the closest location to Detroit you would recommend and why?

    **References:**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/) (https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](https://www.census.gov/data.html) – https://www.census.gov/data.html

    [_QuickFacts – Detroit city, Michigan_](https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/detroitcitymichigan) – https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/detroitcitymichigan

    **Note**: These are both national databases. Also check with the state department of labor and other sources for information.

    For this SLP assignment utilize
    **at least 2 sources from the Trident Online Library** to help strengthen and validate your discussion.

    Make reasonable, cost-effective assumptions in your paper, if needed.  State your assumptions in the beginning of your discussion.

    **Paper length: 2 to 3 pages** (not counting the cover and reference pages).

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    _Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:_

    ·
    **Assignment-Driven:** Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

    ·
    **Critical Thinking:** Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

    ·
    **Business Writing:** Is the essay logical, well organized, and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

    ·
    **Effective Use of Information:** Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

    ·
    **Citing Sources:** Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the
    _Background_ page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the
    _References_ page?

    ·
    **Timeliness**: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

    **## Module2-Resources.docx**

    **Module 2 – Resources**

    **Job Analysis; Staffing; EEO; Diversity**

    **Job Analysis**

    Before we turn to a discussion of the staffing function, EEO, and diversity, let us look at the process called “job analysis” (sometimes called “job study”). Job analysis is what should happen before an organization hires employees. We know, though, that it sometimes is not a systematic process that occurs to develop jobs, but instead a haphazard one. HRM professionals realize, however, that job analysis is supposed to be a systematic procedure to identify and analyze the level of a job and what its profile should look like.

    The information gathered during a job analysis process is valuable to decide job design, write job descriptions, determine job qualifications, and identify job worth (how much the job contributes to the organization). All of the other HRM functions—for example, recruitment and selection, training and development, wage and salary administration, and performance management—should begin with accurate, up-to-date information gained from studying a job.

    Please note that the links below will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscription to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.

    [_Human Resources: Strategic Workforce Planning_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505571&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    [_The selection process_](https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=223276&type=lti&rcode=TUI-505572&srcou=104372) -LinkedIn Learning

    As we can see from the above, it is safe to say that the entire success of HRM is based on an effective job analysis process that is the foundation of the staffing function and the many HRM functions that follow.

    **Equal Employment Opportunity:**

    Equal employment opportunity is a large field of study within human resource management. (Our MGT516 course focuses on EEO.) But more than that, it is the law of the land and provides regulations private-sector employers must follow.

    Because human resource actions affect organization-wide policies and procedures, they often deal with the selection of employees for jobs, promotions, training programs, pay and benefits, layoffs, employee discipline, and discharge. Whenever one employee/applicant is selected over another for whatever reason, there are possible EEO concerns.

    EEO involves many different areas to study, including discrimination and affirmative action.

    The keystone of each organization’s defense in protecting itself against any type of employee relations law violations, charges, and claims is a clear, unambiguous written company policy stating the company’s support and intention to closely adhere to the provisions of employment law. But the process does not stop there.

    Actions are also important. What do the company’s statistics show on the numbers of minorities, women, and disabled persons in its workforce? And importantly, what are the company’s actions related to nurturing the diversity that they have been able to achieve?

    The global nature of our current environment means that many of us work alongside others who have backgrounds different than our own. The ability to effectively consider all employee contributions provides organizations with a competitive advantage.

    It is easy to see, then, that the most successful companies actually manage and nurture the diversity in their organizations.

    It is not enough to merely meet EEO hiring quotas. The goal of these successful organizations is to do all they can to allow all employees to contribute to the organization’s goals and to experience their own personal growth.

    Managing diversity often includes changing the company culture. Employees need to feel comfortable working in their work environments.

    Finish this module by reading the following:

    Marshall, P. (2010, April). Taking action on diversity.
    _The Canadian Manager, 35_(1), 17-18,3. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    **Other Required Sources for Module 2:**

    Juneja, P. (n.d.).
    [_Job analysis and human resource planning._](https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm) Management Study Guide. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-and-human-resource-planning.htm

    The use of this material from Managementstudyguide.com is free for learning and education purpose.

    Jusko, J. (2011). Cutting costs without cutting people.
    _Industry Week, 260_(4), 30-n/a. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Reed, S. M. (2017). Chapter 3: Workforce planning and employment. In
    _A Guide to the Human Resource Body of Knowledge_ (HRBoK). HRCI, John Wiley & Son. Available in the Trident Online Library SkillSoft Books database.

    **SLP**

    [_U.S. Department of Labor_](https://www.dol.gov/)(https://www.dol.gov).

    [_U.S. Census Bureau_](http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml) (http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml).

    **Optional Sources for Module 2:**

    Fox, A. (2011, May). Mixing it up.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 22-27. Retrieve from ProQuest in the Trident online library.

    [_Job analysis background research_](https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/223276-MGT509-2025APR07FT-1/Job%20Analysis%20Background%20Research.ppt?_&d2lSessionVal=KAfHkzqdWXxZVHXPxWpnaXGIv&ou=104372&ou=223276) [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://uwf.edu/search/index.html?q=job+analysis+background+research

    Management Study Guide. (2016).
    [_Approaches to job design_](http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm). Retrieved from http://managementstudyguide.com/approaches-to-job-design.htm

    Owens, D. (2011, May). Bank on diverse talent.
    _HR Magazine, 56_(5), 32-33. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.

    Perrett, B. (2013). Halving labor costs.
    _Aviation Week & Space Technology, 175_(31), 52. Retrieved from EBSCOhost in the Trident Online Library.

  • [Solved] Discussion 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Discussion2.docx **## Discussion2.docx** Discussion 2 In this discussion, respond to the following questions: Conduct online research about the top companies for diversity in the last few years. 1. Select one of the companies discovered in your research. Refer to th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Discussion2.docx

    **## Discussion2.docx**

    Discussion 2

    In this discussion, respond to the following questions:

    Conduct online research about the top companies for diversity in the last few years.

    1. Select one of the companies discovered in your research. Refer to that company by name. Research its diversity and inclusion initiatives.

    2. Compare and contrast the company’s diversity and inclusion efforts with those of your own organization or another one with which you are familiar. Discuss what one or both of these companies say formally about the importance of inclusion of diverse groups. Do you think they walk their talk? Why?

    3. Examine the equal employment opportunity (EEO) efforts and/or affirmative action efforts of your own company or another one with which you are familiar. What does this company say formally about those efforts? Are those efforts the same or different than its diversity and inclusion efforts? Why?

    Support your initial response with information from at least
    **two reputable sources** (library and/or Web-based) and provide the full citation at the end. Use APA format for your references.

    **## Discussion2.docx**

    Discussion 2

    In this discussion, respond to the following questions:

    Conduct online research about the top companies for diversity in the last few years.

    1. Select one of the companies discovered in your research. Refer to that company by name. Research its diversity and inclusion initiatives.

    2. Compare and contrast the company’s diversity and inclusion efforts with those of your own organization or another one with which you are familiar. Discuss what one or both of these companies say formally about the importance of inclusion of diverse groups. Do you think they walk their talk? Why?

    3. Examine the equal employment opportunity (EEO) efforts and/or affirmative action efforts of your own company or another one with which you are familiar. What does this company say formally about those efforts? Are those efforts the same or different than its diversity and inclusion efforts? Why?

    Support your initial response with information from at least
    **two reputable sources** (library and/or Web-based) and provide the full citation at the end. Use APA format for your references.

  • [Solved] week 15

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    read the outline and use the attached pdf to write it – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    read the outline and use the attached pdf to write it

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Outline Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need assistance with an homework, using critical and creative thinking to answer the following: **How did the actors in your selected case study (choose 1 of the 5 battles provided exercise or fail to exercise the principles of mission command, the elements of command and control, and command and co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need assistance with an homework, using critical and creative thinking to answer the following: **How did the actors in your selected case study (choose 1 of the 5 battles provided exercise or fail to exercise the principles of mission command, the elements of command and control, and command and control warfighting function as outlined in ADP 6-0, 2019,** _**Mission command: Command and control of Army forces.**_

    **Assisting Requirements**

    •1000 to 2000 words in length

    •You must use the  (APA) seventh edition style.

    •A minimum of four Level 1 headings are required.

    •The material for this homework should be derived from the assigned readings, class discussion, outside research and the selected case study.

    •The five sections highlighted below are required in the assignment. The following format allows you to organize your thoughts in a logical sequence while promoting clarity.

    •The department chair will determine the due dates and post them on the training calendar.

    – [\
    \
    510A-Mission-Command-OutlineExample.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/510a-mission-command-outlineexample-docx "510A-Mission-Command-OutlineExample.docx")
    – [\
    \
    StudentReadingHueCity_AFamousUrbanBattleMarinesCanLearnFrom1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/studentreadinghuecity-afamousurbanbattlemarinescanlearnfrom1-pdf "StudentReadingHueCity_AFamousUrbanBattleMarinesCanLearnFrom1.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Social Science assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Social Science assignment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference – [\ \ Questions4-22.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions4-22-docx "Questions4-22.docx") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference

    – [\
    \
    Questions4-22.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/questions4-22-docx "Questions4-22.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Google

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) For this assignment, **choose a scholarly critical article from one of the SCTC Library databases, or Google Scholar** that makes a clear argument about any one of the stories you've read…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    For this assignment, **choose a scholarly critical article from one of the SCTC Library databases, or Google Scholar** that makes a clear argument about any one of the stories you've read for class so far. The article you choose must provide more than basic biographical information and plot summary alone- it must make an opinionated argument _about_ some aspect of the literary work you've read for class. Please summarize the article's main ideas, then _evaluate_ your article's merits– is the author's thesis interesting? Did you agree with its ideas? Did the author do an effective job proving their argument- why or why not?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] white week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Class: Information and Digital Literacy • Topic: o Choose a topic that is realistic and one that you want to learn more about. o The topic might be a career field you want to go into or something else that deeply interests you. • Scope and value: o What is the scope of the topic and your research? o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Class:  Information and Digital Literacy

    •    Topic:

    o    Choose a topic that is realistic and one that you want to learn more about.

    o    The topic might be a career field you want to go into or something else that deeply interests you.

    •    Scope and value:

    o    What is the scope of the topic and your research?

    o    What value does it bring to your life? To your professional life?

    •    Communication medium:

    o    How are you going to communicate your project?

    o    How will you make your presentation different and unique?

    •    Critical thinking questions:

    o    Pose different questions that will help you with your research and investigate your topic in more depth.

    o    Post critical questions that will push you to improve.

    •    Subtopics (optional).

    •    Brainstorming (optional).

    Part II: Reflective Paragraph

    Part  II is a reflective paragraph that represents your critical thinking  process when thinking about possible sources and your research. You are  NOT looking for specific sources now. Consider the best possible sources  as presented in the week 2 Lesson. What type of sources will work best  for your research? How can you support your project plan with credible,  current, reliable, accurate, and relevant information?

    .

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Measuring Performance

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) Select one of the following options for your discussion post this week. Option 1: There is an adage in business that says, “You get what you measure.” This suggests that we must carefully monitor performance-t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    Select one of the following options for your discussion post this week.

    Option 1:

    There is an adage in business that says, “You get what you measure.” This suggests that we must carefully monitor performance-tracking metrics if we want to improve business results like increasing productivity, mitigating costs, or improving employee engagement.

    – What is an important performance tracking metric that your company uses, and what is the likely business result they are trying to influence (such as increasing revenue, lowering costs, managing risks, etc.)?
    – Briefly describe how your company calculates and communicates this metric, and share your opinion on the extent to which this performance tracking is helping to improve business results.
    – Share your ideas on how else the company could improve this performance-tracking process.

    **OR**

    Option 2:

    Continuing with the same company you selected in Week 2, consider how financial metrics are utilized to report on performance and how these align with the company's strategic goals.

    Focusing on one of the following metrics – ROA, ROE, FCF, ROIC, Operating Margins, or Profit Margins – respond to the following:

    – How do the company’s stated key metrics align with its strategic objectives to influence outcomes like revenue growth, cost reduction, risk management, or operational efficiency?
    – How can advancements in AI and other technologies help leaders better manage their organization’s key metrics?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] sustainable

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    development – 2 years ago **files (6)** – ## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf – ## reserachmethodstypology.docx – ## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx – ## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf – SustainableDevelopment.pdf – How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf** KEYELEMENTSOF…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    development

    – 2 years ago

    **files (6)**

    – ## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf

    – ## reserachmethodstypology.docx

    – ## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx

    – ## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf

    – SustainableDevelopment.pdf
    – How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf

    **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf**

    KEYELEMENTSOFA:

    RESEARCH
    PROPOSAL

    ASKYOURSELF

    •Whatdoyouwanttodo?
    Whydoyouwanttodoit?
    Howyouproposetodoit.

    TITLE&
    INTRODUCTION

    •Ensureaclear&
    memorabletitle.

    Providesthebackground
    ofyourproject.
    •Describe&explainthe
    problemstatement.

    PROBLEM
    STATEMENT
    &SIGNIFICANCE

    •Highlight&describekey
    featuresoftheproblem.

    •Beexplicitinyour
    descriptionofthe
    researchquestion,
    objectives,orhypothesis.
    Emphasizethepurpose&
    benefitsofthestudy.
    Justifyhowyourproject
    contributestothebodyof
    knowledge.

    RESEARCH
    DESIGN&DATA
    COLLECTION

    •Describeyourproposed
    design&rationale.
    •Itmustsatisfytheaimof
    thestudy.
    •Clarifyhowyouaimto
    findyoursample&collect
    yourdata.
    Languageisfuturetense;
    thisiswhatyouintendto
    do.

    TIMELINE

    •Indicateyourstart&finish
    dates.
    •Chronologicallylistthe
    majorphasesofthe
    project.
    Usethistobreakdown

    thesephases.

    LITERATURE
    REVIEW

    •Theculminationofall
    yourscrutinized
    research.
    •Demonstratea
    thoughtfulsynthesisof
    thismaterial.
    •Emphasizeyourkey
    constructs.
    Showthestateof
    currentknowledgein
    relationtoyour
    problem.

    DATAANALYSIS

    •Focusontheprocess:
    record,transcribe.
    extrapolatethemes.
    Discusswhethermanual
    ordigital&why.
    •Plantimetolearndigital
    applications&processes.

    RESOURCES
    REQUIRED

    •Includespeople,services
    equipment.
    •Anyresearcher'stime.
    travel&accommodation

    •Purchasingofsoftware.
    •Transcriptionword
    processing,orgraphicart
    services

    THE
    DALE
    METHOD

    Formoredetails,youmayvisitwww.thethesiscoach.com.

    **## reserachmethodstypology.docx**

    You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.

    I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.

    Because it's challenging to understand them all.

    It requires many skills. Like:

    → Data analysis
    → Critical thinking
    → Experimental design
    → Statistical interpretation

    All part of conducting great research.

    Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.

    Here are 5 key branches of research methods:

    → Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
    → Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
    → Mixed Methods (combining both)
    → Experimental (testing cause-effect)
    → Observational (watching without interference)

    A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.

    Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.

    Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:

    1. Research question (what you want to explore)
    2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
    3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
    4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
    5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)

    I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.

    And for as much depth and context as my data allows.

    Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:

    1. Ethnography
    2. Case Study
    3. Phenomenology
    4. Grounded Theory
    5. Content Analysis
    6. Action Research
    7. Historical Research

    Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.

    It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.

    Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.

    It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.

    What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?

    [hashtag#research](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=research&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#methodology](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=methodology&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#academicwriting](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=academicwriting&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288)

    Activate to view larger image,

    ![No alternative text description for this image](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/sustainable-20901391)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx**

    **Elements of term research paper**

    When crafting a research term paper for a graduate-level international political economy (IPE) course, you should aim for a structured and rigorous approach. Here's a breakdown of essential components:

    **1. Introduction:**

    ·
    **Clearly Defined Research Question:**

    · This is the cornerstone. It should be specific, relevant to IPE, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the field.

    · It should ask "why" or "how" rather than simply "what."

    ·
    **Background and Significance:**

    · Provide context for your research question. Why is it important? What are its real-world implications?

    · Briefly review relevant existing literature to highlight the gaps your research will address.

    ·
    **Hypothesis Statement:**

    · A concise statement of your main argument or finding. It should provide a clear answer to your research question.

    ·
    **Outline of the Paper:**

    · Give the reader a roadmap of what to expect in the subsequent sections.

    **2. Literature Review:**

    ·
    **Comprehensive Overview:**

    · Demonstrate your understanding of key theories, concepts, and debates.

    · Critically analyze existing research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

    ·
    **Theoretical Framework:**

    · Explicitly state the theoretical perspective(s) guiding your research.

    · Explain how your chosen framework informs your research question and analysis.

    **3. Methodology:**

    ·
    **Research Design:**

    · Clearly describe your research approach (e.g., case study, comparative analysis, quantitative analysis).

    · Explain your data sources and how you collected them.

    ·
    **Analytical Techniques:**

    · Detail the methods you used to analyze your data.

    · Justify your methodological choices.

    ·
    **Potential Limitations:**

    · Acknowledge any limitations of your research design or data.

    **4. Analysis:**

    ·
    **Presentation of Findings:**

    · Present your data and findings in a clear and organized manner.

    · Use tables, figures, or other visual aids as appropriate.

    ·
    **Interpretation and Discussion:**

    · Interpret your findings in relation to your research question and theoretical framework.

    · Discuss the implications of your findings for IPE theory and practice.

    ·
    **Addressing Counterarguments:**

    · Acknowledge and address alternative explanations or counterarguments.

    **5. Conclusion:**

    ·
    **Summary of Key Findings:**

    · Restate your main findings and their significance.

    ·
    **Implications for Theory and Policy:**

    · Discuss the broader implications of your research for IPE theory and policy.

    ·
    **Suggestions for Future Research:**

    · Identify areas for further research that build upon your findings.

    **Key Considerations:**

    ·
    **Academic Rigor:**

    · Maintain a high level of academic rigor throughout your paper.

    · Cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style.

    ·
    **Clarity and Coherence:**

    · Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner.

    · Ensure that your arguments flow logically.

    ·
    **Relevance to IR/IPE:**

    · Keep your focus on the interplay between politics and economics in the international arena and in the context of sustainable development.

    ·
    **Engagement with Current Issues:**

    · Where possible, tying your work into current IR debates will strengthen your paper.

    By including these components, you can produce a strong research term paper that demonstrates your understanding of the PE of SD and your ability to conduct rigorous research.

    **## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf**

    A Brief Guide To Writing A Literature
    Review

    What is a Review of the Literature?

    A “review of the literature” is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and
    researchers have written on a topic. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate
    assignment, but often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In
    writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
    have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of
    writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective,
    the problem or issue you are exploring, or your thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the
    material available, or a set of summaries.

    A literature review consists of an overview, a summary, and an evaluation (“critique”) of the
    current state of knowledge about a specific area of research. It may also include a discussion of
    methodological issues and suggestions for future research.

    Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and
    demonstrate skills in two areas:

    1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual
    and computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles, books and
    documents;

    2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased
    and valid studies.

    A literature review must do these things:

    a. be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
    developing;

    b. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known;
    c. identify areas of controversy in the literature;
    d. formulate questions that need further research.

    Why are Literature Reviews Important?

    To become an expert in any field of endeavour, you must know your field comprehensively.
    Critical reviews of state-of-the-art literature permit the professional to make informed decisions,
    to act in an expert manner, and to set policy in his or her field of expertise.

    Researchers conduct reviews of the literature to justify proposed studies, to uncover patterns of
    findings in the field, to enter into scientific debate, and to discover gaps in knowledge that lead to
    future research questions. Research reviews are often the first step toward making discoveries
    and social interventions in our society.

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Your Review of Literature

    1. Do I have a specific thesis, problem, or research question which my literature review helps to
    define?

    2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
    methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g., studies of neural pathways)? qualitative
    research (e.g., studies of loneliness among migrant workers)?

    3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
    journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What disciplinary databases am I
    searching? (e.g., nursing, psychology, sociology, medicine)?

    4. How good are my information-seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've
    found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is
    the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?

    5. Is there a specific relationship between the literature I've chosen to review and the problem
    I've formulated?

    6. Have I critically analyzed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarize authors and
    articles, or do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the material I
    cite?

    7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Each Book or Article You're Reviewing

    1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
    2. Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,

    relevance) discussed?
    3. What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem or

    issue?
    4. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
    5. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
    6. What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychoanalytic, developmental, feminist)?
    7. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
    8. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include

    literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?
    9. In a research study, how good are the three basic components of the study design (i.e.,

    population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the
    analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions
    validly based upon the data and analysis?

    10. In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples,
    rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely “proving”
    what s/he already believes?

    11. How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you “deconstruct” the flow of the
    argument to analyze if/where it breaks down?

    12. Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, and
    in what ways is it useful for theory or practice? What are its strengths and limitations?

    13. How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?

    ©2007, Dena Bain Taylor, PhD, University of Toronto

    Toronto, Canada. All rights reserved

    **SustainableDevelopment.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sustainabledevelopment-pdf-10270949)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

    **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf**

    KEYELEMENTSOFA:

    RESEARCH
    PROPOSAL

    ASKYOURSELF

    •Whatdoyouwanttodo?
    Whydoyouwanttodoit?
    Howyouproposetodoit.

    TITLE&
    INTRODUCTION

    •Ensureaclear&
    memorabletitle.

    Providesthebackground
    ofyourproject.
    •Describe&explainthe
    problemstatement.

    PROBLEM
    STATEMENT
    &SIGNIFICANCE

    •Highlight&describekey
    featuresoftheproblem.

    •Beexplicitinyour
    descriptionofthe
    researchquestion,
    objectives,orhypothesis.
    Emphasizethepurpose&
    benefitsofthestudy.
    Justifyhowyourproject
    contributestothebodyof
    knowledge.

    RESEARCH
    DESIGN&DATA
    COLLECTION

    •Describeyourproposed
    design&rationale.
    •Itmustsatisfytheaimof
    thestudy.
    •Clarifyhowyouaimto
    findyoursample&collect
    yourdata.
    Languageisfuturetense;
    thisiswhatyouintendto
    do.

    TIMELINE

    •Indicateyourstart&finish
    dates.
    •Chronologicallylistthe
    majorphasesofthe
    project.
    Usethistobreakdown

    thesephases.

    LITERATURE
    REVIEW

    •Theculminationofall
    yourscrutinized
    research.
    •Demonstratea
    thoughtfulsynthesisof
    thismaterial.
    •Emphasizeyourkey
    constructs.
    Showthestateof
    currentknowledgein
    relationtoyour
    problem.

    DATAANALYSIS

    •Focusontheprocess:
    record,transcribe.
    extrapolatethemes.
    Discusswhethermanual
    ordigital&why.
    •Plantimetolearndigital
    applications&processes.

    RESOURCES
    REQUIRED

    •Includespeople,services
    equipment.
    •Anyresearcher'stime.
    travel&accommodation

    •Purchasingofsoftware.
    •Transcriptionword
    processing,orgraphicart
    services

    THE
    DALE
    METHOD

    Formoredetails,youmayvisitwww.thethesiscoach.com.

    **## reserachmethodstypology.docx**

    You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.

    I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.

    Because it's challenging to understand them all.

    It requires many skills. Like:

    → Data analysis
    → Critical thinking
    → Experimental design
    → Statistical interpretation

    All part of conducting great research.

    Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.

    Here are 5 key branches of research methods:

    → Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
    → Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
    → Mixed Methods (combining both)
    → Experimental (testing cause-effect)
    → Observational (watching without interference)

    A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.

    Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.

    Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:

    1. Research question (what you want to explore)
    2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
    3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
    4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
    5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)

    I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.

    And for as much depth and context as my data allows.

    Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:

    1. Ethnography
    2. Case Study
    3. Phenomenology
    4. Grounded Theory
    5. Content Analysis
    6. Action Research
    7. Historical Research

    Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.

    It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.

    Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.

    It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.

    What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?

    [hashtag#research](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=research&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#methodology](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=methodology&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#academicwriting](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=academicwriting&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288)

    Activate to view larger image,

    ![No alternative text description for this image](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/sustainable-20901391)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx**

    **Elements of term research paper**

    When crafting a research term paper for a graduate-level international political economy (IPE) course, you should aim for a structured and rigorous approach. Here's a breakdown of essential components:

    **1. Introduction:**

    ·
    **Clearly Defined Research Question:**

    · This is the cornerstone. It should be specific, relevant to IPE, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the field.

    · It should ask "why" or "how" rather than simply "what."

    ·
    **Background and Significance:**

    · Provide context for your research question. Why is it important? What are its real-world implications?

    · Briefly review relevant existing literature to highlight the gaps your research will address.

    ·
    **Hypothesis Statement:**

    · A concise statement of your main argument or finding. It should provide a clear answer to your research question.

    ·
    **Outline of the Paper:**

    · Give the reader a roadmap of what to expect in the subsequent sections.

    **2. Literature Review:**

    ·
    **Comprehensive Overview:**

    · Demonstrate your understanding of key theories, concepts, and debates.

    · Critically analyze existing research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

    ·
    **Theoretical Framework:**

    · Explicitly state the theoretical perspective(s) guiding your research.

    · Explain how your chosen framework informs your research question and analysis.

    **3. Methodology:**

    ·
    **Research Design:**

    · Clearly describe your research approach (e.g., case study, comparative analysis, quantitative analysis).

    · Explain your data sources and how you collected them.

    ·
    **Analytical Techniques:**

    · Detail the methods you used to analyze your data.

    · Justify your methodological choices.

    ·
    **Potential Limitations:**

    · Acknowledge any limitations of your research design or data.

    **4. Analysis:**

    ·
    **Presentation of Findings:**

    · Present your data and findings in a clear and organized manner.

    · Use tables, figures, or other visual aids as appropriate.

    ·
    **Interpretation and Discussion:**

    · Interpret your findings in relation to your research question and theoretical framework.

    · Discuss the implications of your findings for IPE theory and practice.

    ·
    **Addressing Counterarguments:**

    · Acknowledge and address alternative explanations or counterarguments.

    **5. Conclusion:**

    ·
    **Summary of Key Findings:**

    · Restate your main findings and their significance.

    ·
    **Implications for Theory and Policy:**

    · Discuss the broader implications of your research for IPE theory and policy.

    ·
    **Suggestions for Future Research:**

    · Identify areas for further research that build upon your findings.

    **Key Considerations:**

    ·
    **Academic Rigor:**

    · Maintain a high level of academic rigor throughout your paper.

    · Cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style.

    ·
    **Clarity and Coherence:**

    · Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner.

    · Ensure that your arguments flow logically.

    ·
    **Relevance to IR/IPE:**

    · Keep your focus on the interplay between politics and economics in the international arena and in the context of sustainable development.

    ·
    **Engagement with Current Issues:**

    · Where possible, tying your work into current IR debates will strengthen your paper.

    By including these components, you can produce a strong research term paper that demonstrates your understanding of the PE of SD and your ability to conduct rigorous research.

    **## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf**

    A Brief Guide To Writing A Literature
    Review

    What is a Review of the Literature?

    A “review of the literature” is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and
    researchers have written on a topic. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate
    assignment, but often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In
    writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
    have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of
    writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective,
    the problem or issue you are exploring, or your thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the
    material available, or a set of summaries.

    A literature review consists of an overview, a summary, and an evaluation (“critique”) of the
    current state of knowledge about a specific area of research. It may also include a discussion of
    methodological issues and suggestions for future research.

    Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and
    demonstrate skills in two areas:

    1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual
    and computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles, books and
    documents;

    2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased
    and valid studies.

    A literature review must do these things:

    a. be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
    developing;

    b. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known;
    c. identify areas of controversy in the literature;
    d. formulate questions that need further research.

    Why are Literature Reviews Important?

    To become an expert in any field of endeavour, you must know your field comprehensively.
    Critical reviews of state-of-the-art literature permit the professional to make informed decisions,
    to act in an expert manner, and to set policy in his or her field of expertise.

    Researchers conduct reviews of the literature to justify proposed studies, to uncover patterns of
    findings in the field, to enter into scientific debate, and to discover gaps in knowledge that lead to
    future research questions. Research reviews are often the first step toward making discoveries
    and social interventions in our society.

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Your Review of Literature

    1. Do I have a specific thesis, problem, or research question which my literature review helps to
    define?

    2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
    methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g., studies of neural pathways)? qualitative
    research (e.g., studies of loneliness among migrant workers)?

    3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
    journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What disciplinary databases am I
    searching? (e.g., nursing, psychology, sociology, medicine)?

    4. How good are my information-seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've
    found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is
    the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?

    5. Is there a specific relationship between the literature I've chosen to review and the problem
    I've formulated?

    6. Have I critically analyzed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarize authors and
    articles, or do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the material I
    cite?

    7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Each Book or Article You're Reviewing

    1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
    2. Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,

    relevance) discussed?
    3. What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem or

    issue?
    4. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
    5. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
    6. What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychoanalytic, developmental, feminist)?
    7. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
    8. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include

    literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?
    9. In a research study, how good are the three basic components of the study design (i.e.,

    population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the
    analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions
    validly based upon the data and analysis?

    10. In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples,
    rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely “proving”
    what s/he already believes?

    11. How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you “deconstruct” the flow of the
    argument to analyze if/where it breaks down?

    12. Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, and
    in what ways is it useful for theory or practice? What are its strengths and limitations?

    13. How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?

    ©2007, Dena Bain Taylor, PhD, University of Toronto

    Toronto, Canada. All rights reserved

    **SustainableDevelopment.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sustainabledevelopment-pdf-10270949)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

    **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf**

    KEYELEMENTSOFA:

    RESEARCH
    PROPOSAL

    ASKYOURSELF

    •Whatdoyouwanttodo?
    Whydoyouwanttodoit?
    Howyouproposetodoit.

    TITLE&
    INTRODUCTION

    •Ensureaclear&
    memorabletitle.

    Providesthebackground
    ofyourproject.
    •Describe&explainthe
    problemstatement.

    PROBLEM
    STATEMENT
    &SIGNIFICANCE

    •Highlight&describekey
    featuresoftheproblem.

    •Beexplicitinyour
    descriptionofthe
    researchquestion,
    objectives,orhypothesis.
    Emphasizethepurpose&
    benefitsofthestudy.
    Justifyhowyourproject
    contributestothebodyof
    knowledge.

    RESEARCH
    DESIGN&DATA
    COLLECTION

    •Describeyourproposed
    design&rationale.
    •Itmustsatisfytheaimof
    thestudy.
    •Clarifyhowyouaimto
    findyoursample&collect
    yourdata.
    Languageisfuturetense;
    thisiswhatyouintendto
    do.

    TIMELINE

    •Indicateyourstart&finish
    dates.
    •Chronologicallylistthe
    majorphasesofthe
    project.
    Usethistobreakdown

    thesephases.

    LITERATURE
    REVIEW

    •Theculminationofall
    yourscrutinized
    research.
    •Demonstratea
    thoughtfulsynthesisof
    thismaterial.
    •Emphasizeyourkey
    constructs.
    Showthestateof
    currentknowledgein
    relationtoyour
    problem.

    DATAANALYSIS

    •Focusontheprocess:
    record,transcribe.
    extrapolatethemes.
    Discusswhethermanual
    ordigital&why.
    •Plantimetolearndigital
    applications&processes.

    RESOURCES
    REQUIRED

    •Includespeople,services
    equipment.
    •Anyresearcher'stime.
    travel&accommodation

    •Purchasingofsoftware.
    •Transcriptionword
    processing,orgraphicart
    services

    THE
    DALE
    METHOD

    Formoredetails,youmayvisitwww.thethesiscoach.com.

    **## reserachmethodstypology.docx**

    You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.

    I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.

    Because it's challenging to understand them all.

    It requires many skills. Like:

    → Data analysis
    → Critical thinking
    → Experimental design
    → Statistical interpretation

    All part of conducting great research.

    Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.

    Here are 5 key branches of research methods:

    → Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
    → Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
    → Mixed Methods (combining both)
    → Experimental (testing cause-effect)
    → Observational (watching without interference)

    A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.

    Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.

    Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:

    1. Research question (what you want to explore)
    2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
    3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
    4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
    5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)

    I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.

    And for as much depth and context as my data allows.

    Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:

    1. Ethnography
    2. Case Study
    3. Phenomenology
    4. Grounded Theory
    5. Content Analysis
    6. Action Research
    7. Historical Research

    Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.

    It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.

    Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.

    It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.

    What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?

    [hashtag#research](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=research&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#methodology](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=methodology&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#academicwriting](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=academicwriting&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288)

    Activate to view larger image,

    ![No alternative text description for this image](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/sustainable-20901391)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx**

    **Elements of term research paper**

    When crafting a research term paper for a graduate-level international political economy (IPE) course, you should aim for a structured and rigorous approach. Here's a breakdown of essential components:

    **1. Introduction:**

    ·
    **Clearly Defined Research Question:**

    · This is the cornerstone. It should be specific, relevant to IPE, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the field.

    · It should ask "why" or "how" rather than simply "what."

    ·
    **Background and Significance:**

    · Provide context for your research question. Why is it important? What are its real-world implications?

    · Briefly review relevant existing literature to highlight the gaps your research will address.

    ·
    **Hypothesis Statement:**

    · A concise statement of your main argument or finding. It should provide a clear answer to your research question.

    ·
    **Outline of the Paper:**

    · Give the reader a roadmap of what to expect in the subsequent sections.

    **2. Literature Review:**

    ·
    **Comprehensive Overview:**

    · Demonstrate your understanding of key theories, concepts, and debates.

    · Critically analyze existing research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

    ·
    **Theoretical Framework:**

    · Explicitly state the theoretical perspective(s) guiding your research.

    · Explain how your chosen framework informs your research question and analysis.

    **3. Methodology:**

    ·
    **Research Design:**

    · Clearly describe your research approach (e.g., case study, comparative analysis, quantitative analysis).

    · Explain your data sources and how you collected them.

    ·
    **Analytical Techniques:**

    · Detail the methods you used to analyze your data.

    · Justify your methodological choices.

    ·
    **Potential Limitations:**

    · Acknowledge any limitations of your research design or data.

    **4. Analysis:**

    ·
    **Presentation of Findings:**

    · Present your data and findings in a clear and organized manner.

    · Use tables, figures, or other visual aids as appropriate.

    ·
    **Interpretation and Discussion:**

    · Interpret your findings in relation to your research question and theoretical framework.

    · Discuss the implications of your findings for IPE theory and practice.

    ·
    **Addressing Counterarguments:**

    · Acknowledge and address alternative explanations or counterarguments.

    **5. Conclusion:**

    ·
    **Summary of Key Findings:**

    · Restate your main findings and their significance.

    ·
    **Implications for Theory and Policy:**

    · Discuss the broader implications of your research for IPE theory and policy.

    ·
    **Suggestions for Future Research:**

    · Identify areas for further research that build upon your findings.

    **Key Considerations:**

    ·
    **Academic Rigor:**

    · Maintain a high level of academic rigor throughout your paper.

    · Cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style.

    ·
    **Clarity and Coherence:**

    · Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner.

    · Ensure that your arguments flow logically.

    ·
    **Relevance to IR/IPE:**

    · Keep your focus on the interplay between politics and economics in the international arena and in the context of sustainable development.

    ·
    **Engagement with Current Issues:**

    · Where possible, tying your work into current IR debates will strengthen your paper.

    By including these components, you can produce a strong research term paper that demonstrates your understanding of the PE of SD and your ability to conduct rigorous research.

    **## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf**

    A Brief Guide To Writing A Literature
    Review

    What is a Review of the Literature?

    A “review of the literature” is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and
    researchers have written on a topic. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate
    assignment, but often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In
    writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
    have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of
    writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective,
    the problem or issue you are exploring, or your thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the
    material available, or a set of summaries.

    A literature review consists of an overview, a summary, and an evaluation (“critique”) of the
    current state of knowledge about a specific area of research. It may also include a discussion of
    methodological issues and suggestions for future research.

    Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and
    demonstrate skills in two areas:

    1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual
    and computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles, books and
    documents;

    2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased
    and valid studies.

    A literature review must do these things:

    a. be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
    developing;

    b. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known;
    c. identify areas of controversy in the literature;
    d. formulate questions that need further research.

    Why are Literature Reviews Important?

    To become an expert in any field of endeavour, you must know your field comprehensively.
    Critical reviews of state-of-the-art literature permit the professional to make informed decisions,
    to act in an expert manner, and to set policy in his or her field of expertise.

    Researchers conduct reviews of the literature to justify proposed studies, to uncover patterns of
    findings in the field, to enter into scientific debate, and to discover gaps in knowledge that lead to
    future research questions. Research reviews are often the first step toward making discoveries
    and social interventions in our society.

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Your Review of Literature

    1. Do I have a specific thesis, problem, or research question which my literature review helps to
    define?

    2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
    methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g., studies of neural pathways)? qualitative
    research (e.g., studies of loneliness among migrant workers)?

    3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
    journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What disciplinary databases am I
    searching? (e.g., nursing, psychology, sociology, medicine)?

    4. How good are my information-seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've
    found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is
    the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?

    5. Is there a specific relationship between the literature I've chosen to review and the problem
    I've formulated?

    6. Have I critically analyzed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarize authors and
    articles, or do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the material I
    cite?

    7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Each Book or Article You're Reviewing

    1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
    2. Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,

    relevance) discussed?
    3. What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem or

    issue?
    4. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
    5. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
    6. What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychoanalytic, developmental, feminist)?
    7. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
    8. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include

    literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?
    9. In a research study, how good are the three basic components of the study design (i.e.,

    population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the
    analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions
    validly based upon the data and analysis?

    10. In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples,
    rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely “proving”
    what s/he already believes?

    11. How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you “deconstruct” the flow of the
    argument to analyze if/where it breaks down?

    12. Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, and
    in what ways is it useful for theory or practice? What are its strengths and limitations?

    13. How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?

    ©2007, Dena Bain Taylor, PhD, University of Toronto

    Toronto, Canada. All rights reserved

    **SustainableDevelopment.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sustainabledevelopment-pdf-10270949)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)