Tag: Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

  • [Solved] Case 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **An 82-year-old man recently returned to the long-term care facility after hospitalization for open reduction internal fixation of the right hip. He has been divorced for over 50 years and has two adult children who visit him frequently in the nursing home. He has a 5-year history of mild to modera…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **An 82-year-old man recently returned to the long-term care facility after hospitalization for open reduction internal fixation of the right hip. He has been divorced for over 50 years and has two adult children who visit him frequently in the nursing home. He has a 5-year history of mild to moderate dementia and known urinary tract infections. His last recorded mini mental state examination (MMSE) registered 18, which was 3 months ago. While in the hospital, he did have an indwelling catheter for 4 days. He has been incontinent since his return to the hospital but the staff their attributes this to the catheter and his deconditioned state following hospitalization. His medications include donepezil, memantine, and acetaminophen for pain and fever as needed. He has no other known medical problems except a history of multiple urinary tract infections throughout his lifetime that, according to his son, have required extensive antibiotic treatment. He enjoys drinking regular coffee throughout the day, says it is a habit he has had since his days in the service years ago. His family members and the nursing staff report that he has been very restless and has been unable to use the urinal on time the past couple of days.**

    **Vital signs:** **T 99°F, HR 80, RR 18, BP 128/78, BMI 22.**

    **Chief Complaint:** **Foul smelling urine, incontinence, restless**

    **Discuss the following:**

    **1) What additional subjective data are you seeking to include past medical history, social, and relevant family history?**

    **2) What additional objective data will you be assessing for?**

    **3) What are the differential diagnoses that you are considering?**

    **4) What laboratory tests will help you rule out some of the differential diagnoses?**

    **5) What radiological examinations or additional diagnostic studies would you order?**

    **6) What treatment and specific information about the prescription that you will give this patient?**

    **7) What are the potential complications from the treatment ordered?**

    **8) What additional laboratory tests might you consider ordering?**

    **9) What additional patient teaching may be needed?**

    **10) Will you be looking for a consult?**

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – **Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## HealthPromotionProposalpart2.docx – ## Attemptfeedback.docx – ## DepressioninLow.edited1.pdf **## HealthPromotionProposalpart2.docx** **Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2** **This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one**, which you submit…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## HealthPromotionProposalpart2.docx

    – ## Attemptfeedback.docx

    – ## DepressioninLow.edited1.pdf

    **## HealthPromotionProposalpart2.docx**

    **Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2**

    **This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one**, which you submitted previously.

    Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.

    **Directions**

    You have already completed the steps 1-4.
    **Do not resubmit part 1.** Make sure you incorporate any suggested revisions or improvements into your submission according to your instructor’s comments.

    **For this assignment develop criteria 5-8 as detailed below:**

    **You will submit just this section 5-8 as an essay. Please do not resubmit Part 1.**

    Use a presentation page. Start the body of content with topic 5.

    · 5. Propose a health promotion program using an evidence-based intervention found in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which includes resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    · Be certain to include a timeline. (3 to 4 paragraphs- you may use bullets if appropriate).

    · 6. Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach.
    **The SMART goal statement should be no more than one sentence** (1 paragraph).

    · 7. Provide a detailed plan for the evaluation of each outcome. (2-3 paragraphs).

    · 8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges. (2+ paragraphs).

    · Finish the paper with a conclusion paragraph (2 paragraphs) without typing the word "conclusion" before the paragraph.

    **Paper Requirements**

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. Remember, your Proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school-level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about health promotion.

    **APA must be strictly followed.**

    **Your final assignment should be minimally 5 pages (excluding title page and references).**

    **Finish the essay with your reference page.**

    **6 references**

    **Please review the Grading Rubric for this Assignment.**

    **## Attemptfeedback.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    This submission shows commendable efforts in addressing depression among low-income populations and proposing community-based interventions. However, there are areas for improvement to enhance the overall development of the paper, particularly regarding the vulnerable population, statistical significance, and adherence to assignment requirements.

    **Promising Theoretical Framework**:

    · The use of the human ecological model is an excellent choice as it considers multiple levels of influence—individual, interpersonal, community, and societal—on mental health. This comprehensive approach aligns well with the complexities of addressing depression in low-income populations.

    **Cultural Relevance and Accessibility**:

    · The submission highlights the importance of culturally tailored interventions and community-based approaches, such as peer support and task-shifting. These strategies are effective in improving treatment adherence and overcoming barriers faced by disadvantaged communities.

    **Integration of Evidence-Based Interventions**:

    · The literature review incorporates practical interventions like peer support and task-shifting, with both approaches showing measurable benefits in mental health outcomes. This shows thoughtfulness in applying evidence to address the issue.

    **Areas for Improvement:**

    1.
    **Insufficient Number of References**:

    · The student did not include the required minimum of six scholarly references, which negatively affected the paper’s development. Without meeting this requirement, the paper lacks the depth and breadth of evidence needed to fully support the proposed strategies. Adding more peer-reviewed studies, especially those addressing diverse geographic areas and long-term impacts, would strengthen the submission.

    **Underdeveloped Vulnerable Population Description**:

    · The vulnerable population section does not sufficiently explore specific groups or provide detailed statistical evidence of their risk factors. Including more data, such as prevalence rates of untreated depression among low-income individuals or disparities in healthcare access, would enhance the significance of the discussion.

    **Limited Statistical Context**:

    · The submission includes brief mentions of depression rates, but it lacks robust statistical support. Incorporating detailed statistics and trends, such as rates of untreated depression or disparities in mental health outcomes, would add weight to the argument and make the issue’s scope more compelling.

    **Lack of Measurable Program Objectives**:

    · While the submission discusses general strategies for addressing depression, it would benefit from setting clear, measurable objectives. For example, establishing goals such as a percentage increase in treatment adherence or reduction in depressive symptoms over a specific timeframe would add clarity and focus to the proposal.

    **Sustainability Strategies**:

    · The paper should elaborate on how interventions like task-shifting and peer support can be sustained long-term, such as through funding mechanisms, policy advocacy, or partnerships with community organizations.

    **Suggested Strategies and Areas for Improvement:**

    **Expand References**:

    · Include additional scholarly articles addressing depression interventions, such as those exploring long-term outcomes, rural populations, or policy-based approaches. Platforms like PubMed, JSTOR, and PsycINFO can be utilized for locating relevant studies.

    **Enhance the Vulnerable Population Section**:

    · Provide a more detailed and data-driven analysis of the low-income population's risk factors, including statistics on depression prevalence, healthcare access gaps, and social determinants of health.

    **Incorporate Statistical Context**:

    · Use credible sources to provide detailed statistics on untreated depression, disparities in mental health treatment, and outcomes among low-income populations.

    **Define Specific Objectives**:

    · Set measurable program goals, such as increasing access to mental health services or achieving a particular improvement in depression symptoms among participants.

    **Focus on Sustainability**:

    · Develop a plan for sustaining interventions through funding, community partnerships, and policy reforms.

    **Resources for Improvement:**

    **University Writing Center**:

    · Schedule one-on-one tutoring sessions for feedback on expanding content, improving statistical analysis, and addressing gaps in development.

    **Library Databases**:

    · Use academic resources like PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar to identify additional articles and evidence to enhance the literature review.

    This submission demonstrates a solid foundation for addressing depression through community-based interventions and culturally relevant strategies. However, addressing the insufficient number of references, enhancing the vulnerable population section, and incorporating detailed statistical evidence would significantly improve the paper’s depth and impact.

    Show more

    Rubric

    Rubric Result

    **87.2/ 100**

    ·
    **Integration of Knowledge**

    25% of total result

    **20**

    **Satisfactory**

    The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. Questions were not fully developed but concepts are explained well.

    ·
    **Topic Focus**

    25% of total result

    **25**

    **Excellent**

    The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.

    ·
    **Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness**

    25% of total result

    **20**

    **Satisfactory**

    In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.

    ·
    **Sources**

    7% of total result

    **4.2**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    Used 4 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible.

    ·
    **APA adherence and Citation in text**

    6% of total result

    **6**

    **Excellent**

    Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors

    ·
    **Spelling and Grammar**

    12% of total result

    **12**

    **Excellent**

    Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met.

    **## DepressioninLow.edited1.pdf**

    1

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Eliecer M Rodriguez

    FNU

    Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

    Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo

    March 15, 2025

    2

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Depression is a severe mental disorder that affects so many people across the globe. It is

    especially common among poor people, who often live under tremendous stress and financial

    difficulty and with limited access to mental health care. Depression is one of the significant

    causes of disability, as reported by the World Health Organization, and it affects about over 200

    million people globally. In the US, data from the National Institute of Mental Health shows that

    people living in poverty are more than twice as likely to experience depression as those with

    more income. This proposal will seek to improve mental health among poor people through

    depression education, building community support networks, and increasing access to mental

    health services. The expected result is a decrease in the number of people suffering from

    depression and their mental health improvement. It will be measured by tracking the number of

    people participating in the program and having better access to mental health care.

    Vulnerable Population

    Poor people are more vulnerable to depression due to the various challenges they

    encounter, including economic instability, limited healthcare access, and poor living conditions.

    Economic instability leads to stress, thus increasing the risk of mental illness development. Most

    people in poor communities struggle with basic needs such as food, suitable housing, and

    employment (Martinez et al., 2021). Such social determinants of health make it difficult to enjoy

    good mental health. Furthermore, people in poverty do not access professional mental health

    services due to unaffordability, stigma, and lack of awareness of the services available, thus the

    high rate of untreated depression. Racial and ethnic minority groups among people with low

    incomes suffer even more significant disparities in mental health care. Research conducted by

    the American Psychological Association shows that African American and Hispanic patients

    3

    have more untreated depression than white patients (American Psychological Association, 2017).

    It is due to social issues, dialect boundaries, and systemic inequalities in healthcare access.

    Review of Literature

    Giebel et al. (2022) researched how community-based interventions affect depression

    treatment in low-income communities. It showed that peer support methods and culturally

    adjusted therapy improved mental health outcomes. Depression patients received peer support

    interventions that connected them to others having depression experience so they would develop

    improved feelings while reducing their isolation perception. The treatment interventions went

    through cultural adaptation to fit the orientation of each participant, thus making them more

    accessible and acceptable. Research showed that group therapeutic activities and social support

    groups created the most successful act of treatment adherence. The participants exposed to

    intervention techniques were likelier to maintain therapy appointments, join therapeutic

    discussions, and adhere to treatment protocols. Symptom of become less among the unprivileged

    due to therapy interventions that provided them with both emotional support and coping

    mechanisms. Furthermore, Matteo Bessone et al. (2024) also researched the application of

    depression care techniques that involved task-shifting with trained lay health workers. Shift

    supervision strategies require non skilled staff to take over certain functions that were previously

    allocated to a psychologist after being taught to them. The use of such care services was made

    easier through this method for patients who were both challenged in receiving care from trained

    non-staffs managed to significantly improve the intensity of their depression. The teachers

    provided counseling services accompanied with education and emotional support to the patients.

    In addition, trained health workers attended to patients who were able to use techniques for

    4

    symptom relieve. The success of task shifting shows that even a small amount of training in

    mental healthcare can enable non-professionals to provide basic care.

    Evaluation of Literature

    Research performed by Giebel et al. (2022) and the study reported by Bessone et al.

    (2024) collectively produce significant findings about successful mental health treatment

    methods aimed at low-income populations dealing with depressive symptoms. According to

    Giebel et al. (2022) successful mental health intervention programs need to develop specific

    cultural approaches treating social along with psychological mental health risk factors. The

    research demonstrates that peer support best practices foster community membership while

    lowering stigma which results in superior treatment results. This research study investigates

    urban populations only so it cannot provide complete results about depression experiences in

    rural low-income populations.

    Bessone et al. (2024) introduce a cost-effective system by developing lay health

    employees to deliver mental health support to communities that lack access to qualified medical

    providers. Communities with critical specialist shortages find this approach beneficial because it

    creates broad access to essential services. The approach decreases pressure on the healthcare

    system by using community members to deliver implemented interventions. The efficacy of this

    intervention depends on both the implementation of quality training sessions for lay health

    workers and adequate supervision programs. The combination of peer support initiatives with

    trained non-specialist mental health employees represents the most practical solution for

    reducing depression rates in low-income communities. Community-based peer support, together

    with trained non-specialist mental health workers, presents a possible solution to health care

    deficits through effective and reachable services. A combined model would utilize culturally

    5

    specific interventions by task-sharing the workload to address professional shortages. Several

    support systems incorporated into this strategy would create comprehensive care that produces

    better mental health results for disadvantaged people in city and country areas.

    Theoretical Framework

    The human ecological model acts as a framework for fully considering the many different

    factors that affect an individual’s mental health, and it is particularly useful in dealing with

    depression among lower socioeconomic groups. It deals with problems at several levels;

    individual, interpersonal, community, and societal, which increases the likelihood of developing

    feasible solutions (Kleinman et al., 2023). Individual educational intervention on depression and

    coping techniques represents the most fundamental and essential form of psychiatric care. A

    significant portion of the low income population has a major health literacy problem which is a

    combination of not knowing and misunderstanding the services that are offered. Using

    workshops, webinars, and local community programs assist them in recognizing their problems

    and taking initiative to receive appropriate care.

    Moreover, passing on useful skills in problem-solving, and resilience training equips

    individuals to navigate a range of life challenges effectively. Addressing mental health issues at

    the personal level puts the groundwork for self-care practices and reduces the incidence of

    untreated depression. Supportive relationships are crucial in safeguarding against depression and

    mitigating the effects of loneliness and economic hardships. A scalable mental health care

    system necessitates collaborative efforts with community clinics, faith-based organizations, and

    non-profits, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas, to enhance the availability of

    services. Task-shifting offers a viable solution to the shortage of specialized health professionals

    by equipping general healthcare providers with essential skills for delivering mental health

    6

    services. Policy reforms must tackle limitations in insurance coverage and the integration of

    primary care services to ensure comprehensive mental health support. The proposed style,

    grounded in the SEM, aims to put various involvement that will improve accessibility and

    sustainability, and reducing depression among low-income populations.

    7

    References

    American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethnic and Racial Minorities & Socioeconomic

    Status. American Psychological Association.

    https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/minorities

    Giebel, C., Shrestha, N., Reilly, S., White, R. G., Zuluaga, M. I., Saldarriaga, G., Liu, G., Allen,

    D., & Gabbay, M. (2022). Community-based mental health and well-being interventions

    for older adults in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-

    analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 773. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03453-1

    Kleinman, M. B., Anvari, M. S., Seitz-Brown, C. J., Bradley, V. D., Tralka, H., Felton, J. W.,

    Belcher, A. M., Greenblatt, A. D., & Magidson, J. F. (2023). Psychosocial challenges

    affecting patient-defined medication for opioid use disorder treatment outcomes in a low-

    income, underserved population: Application of the social-ecological framework. Journal

    of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 149, 209046.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2023.209046

    Martinez, S. M., Esaryk, E. E., Moffat, L., & Ritchie, L. (2021). Redefining Basic Needs for

    Higher Education: It is More Than Minimal Food and Housing According to California

    University Students. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 089011712199229.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117121992295

    Matteo Bessone, Bianco, F. L., & Gianluca D'Amico. (2024). Transforming clinical psychology:

    An ecological and psychopolitical perspective. An Italian and global case. RIVISTA DI

    PSICOLOGIA CLINICA, 1, 35–60. https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2024oa18051

    Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    6 references required- 5 used but inly 4 were current

    – Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice
    – Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo
    – References

    **## DepressioninLow.edited1.pdf**

    1

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Eliecer M Rodriguez

    FNU

    Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

    Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo

    March 15, 2025

    2

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Depression is a severe mental disorder that affects so many people across the globe. It is

    especially common among poor people, who often live under tremendous stress and financial

    difficulty and with limited access to mental health care. Depression is one of the significant

    causes of disability, as reported by the World Health Organization, and it affects about over 200

    million people globally. In the US, data from the National Institute of Mental Health shows that

    people living in poverty are more than twice as likely to experience depression as those with

    more income. This proposal will seek to improve mental health among poor people through

    depression education, building community support networks, and increasing access to mental

    health services. The expected result is a decrease in the number of people suffering from

    depression and their mental health improvement. It will be measured by tracking the number of

    people participating in the program and having better access to mental health care.

    Vulnerable Population

    Poor people are more vulnerable to depression due to the various challenges they

    encounter, including economic instability, limited healthcare access, and poor living conditions.

    Economic instability leads to stress, thus increasing the risk of mental illness development. Most

    people in poor communities struggle with basic needs such as food, suitable housing, and

    employment (Martinez et al., 2021). Such social determinants of health make it difficult to enjoy

    good mental health. Furthermore, people in poverty do not access professional mental health

    services due to unaffordability, stigma, and lack of awareness of the services available, thus the

    high rate of untreated depression. Racial and ethnic minority groups among people with low

    incomes suffer even more significant disparities in mental health care. Research conducted by

    the American Psychological Association shows that African American and Hispanic patients

    3

    have more untreated depression than white patients (American Psychological Association, 2017).

    It is due to social issues, dialect boundaries, and systemic inequalities in healthcare access.

    Review of Literature

    Giebel et al. (2022) researched how community-based interventions affect depression

    treatment in low-income communities. It showed that peer support methods and culturally

    adjusted therapy improved mental health outcomes. Depression patients received peer support

    interventions that connected them to others having depression experience so they would develop

    improved feelings while reducing their isolation perception. The treatment interventions went

    through cultural adaptation to fit the orientation of each participant, thus making them more

    accessible and acceptable. Research showed that group therapeutic activities and social support

    groups created the most successful act of treatment adherence. The participants exposed to

    intervention techniques were likelier to maintain therapy appointments, join therapeutic

    discussions, and adhere to treatment protocols. Symptom of become less among the unprivileged

    due to therapy interventions that provided them with both emotional support and coping

    mechanisms. Furthermore, Matteo Bessone et al. (2024) also researched the application of

    depression care techniques that involved task-shifting with trained lay health workers. Shift

    supervision strategies require non skilled staff to take over certain functions that were previously

    allocated to a psychologist after being taught to them. The use of such care services was made

    easier through this method for patients who were both challenged in receiving care from trained

    non-staffs managed to significantly improve the intensity of their depression. The teachers

    provided counseling services accompanied with education and emotional support to the patients.

    In addition, trained health workers attended to patients who were able to use techniques for

    4

    symptom relieve. The success of task shifting shows that even a small amount of training in

    mental healthcare can enable non-professionals to provide basic care.

    Evaluation of Literature

    Research performed by Giebel et al. (2022) and the study reported by Bessone et al.

    (2024) collectively produce significant findings about successful mental health treatment

    methods aimed at low-income populations dealing with depressive symptoms. According to

    Giebel et al. (2022) successful mental health intervention programs need to develop specific

    cultural approaches treating social along with psychological mental health risk factors. The

    research demonstrates that peer support best practices foster community membership while

    lowering stigma which results in superior treatment results. This research study investigates

    urban populations only so it cannot provide complete results about depression experiences in

    rural low-income populations.

    Bessone et al. (2024) introduce a cost-effective system by developing lay health

    employees to deliver mental health support to communities that lack access to qualified medical

    providers. Communities with critical specialist shortages find this approach beneficial because it

    creates broad access to essential services. The approach decreases pressure on the healthcare

    system by using community members to deliver implemented interventions. The efficacy of this

    intervention depends on both the implementation of quality training sessions for lay health

    workers and adequate supervision programs. The combination of peer support initiatives with

    trained non-specialist mental health employees represents the most practical solution for

    reducing depression rates in low-income communities. Community-based peer support, together

    with trained non-specialist mental health workers, presents a possible solution to health care

    deficits through effective and reachable services. A combined model would utilize culturally

    5

    specific interventions by task-sharing the workload to address professional shortages. Several

    support systems incorporated into this strategy would create comprehensive care that produces

    better mental health results for disadvantaged people in city and country areas.

    Theoretical Framework

    The human ecological model acts as a framework for fully considering the many different

    factors that affect an individual’s mental health, and it is particularly useful in dealing with

    depression among lower socioeconomic groups. It deals with problems at several levels;

    individual, interpersonal, community, and societal, which increases the likelihood of developing

    feasible solutions (Kleinman et al., 2023). Individual educational intervention on depression and

    coping techniques represents the most fundamental and essential form of psychiatric care. A

    significant portion of the low income population has a major health literacy problem which is a

    combination of not knowing and misunderstanding the services that are offered. Using

    workshops, webinars, and local community programs assist them in recognizing their problems

    and taking initiative to receive appropriate care.

    Moreover, passing on useful skills in problem-solving, and resilience training equips

    individuals to navigate a range of life challenges effectively. Addressing mental health issues at

    the personal level puts the groundwork for self-care practices and reduces the incidence of

    untreated depression. Supportive relationships are crucial in safeguarding against depression and

    mitigating the effects of loneliness and economic hardships. A scalable mental health care

    system necessitates collaborative efforts with community clinics, faith-based organizations, and

    non-profits, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas, to enhance the availability of

    services. Task-shifting offers a viable solution to the shortage of specialized health professionals

    by equipping general healthcare providers with essential skills for delivering mental health

    6

    services. Policy reforms must tackle limitations in insurance coverage and the integration of

    primary care services to ensure comprehensive mental health support. The proposed style,

    grounded in the SEM, aims to put various involvement that will improve accessibility and

    sustainability, and reducing depression among low-income populations.

    7

    References

    American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethnic and Racial Minorities & Socioeconomic

    Status. American Psychological Association.

    https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/minorities

    Giebel, C., Shrestha, N., Reilly, S., White, R. G., Zuluaga, M. I., Saldarriaga, G., Liu, G., Allen,

    D., & Gabbay, M. (2022). Community-based mental health and well-being interventions

    for older adults in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-

    analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 773. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03453-1

    Kleinman, M. B., Anvari, M. S., Seitz-Brown, C. J., Bradley, V. D., Tralka, H., Felton, J. W.,

    Belcher, A. M., Greenblatt, A. D., & Magidson, J. F. (2023). Psychosocial challenges

    affecting patient-defined medication for opioid use disorder treatment outcomes in a low-

    income, underserved population: Application of the social-ecological framework. Journal

    of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 149, 209046.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2023.209046

    Martinez, S. M., Esaryk, E. E., Moffat, L., & Ritchie, L. (2021). Redefining Basic Needs for

    Higher Education: It is More Than Minimal Food and Housing According to California

    University Students. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 089011712199229.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117121992295

    Matteo Bessone, Bianco, F. L., & Gianluca D'Amico. (2024). Transforming clinical psychology:

    An ecological and psychopolitical perspective. An Italian and global case. RIVISTA DI

    PSICOLOGIA CLINICA, 1, 35–60. https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2024oa18051

    Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    6 references required- 5 used but inly 4 were current

    – Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice
    – Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo
    – References

    **## HealthPromotionProposalpart2.docx**

    **Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2**

    **This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one**, which you submitted previously.

    Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.

    **Directions**

    You have already completed the steps 1-4.
    **Do not resubmit part 1.** Make sure you incorporate any suggested revisions or improvements into your submission according to your instructor’s comments.

    **For this assignment develop criteria 5-8 as detailed below:**

    **You will submit just this section 5-8 as an essay. Please do not resubmit Part 1.**

    Use a presentation page. Start the body of content with topic 5.

    · 5. Propose a health promotion program using an evidence-based intervention found in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which includes resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    · Be certain to include a timeline. (3 to 4 paragraphs- you may use bullets if appropriate).

    · 6. Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach.
    **The SMART goal statement should be no more than one sentence** (1 paragraph).

    · 7. Provide a detailed plan for the evaluation of each outcome. (2-3 paragraphs).

    · 8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges. (2+ paragraphs).

    · Finish the paper with a conclusion paragraph (2 paragraphs) without typing the word "conclusion" before the paragraph.

    **Paper Requirements**

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. Remember, your Proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school-level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about health promotion.

    **APA must be strictly followed.**

    **Your final assignment should be minimally 5 pages (excluding title page and references).**

    **Finish the essay with your reference page.**

    **6 references**

    **Please review the Grading Rubric for this Assignment.**

    **## Attemptfeedback.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    This submission shows commendable efforts in addressing depression among low-income populations and proposing community-based interventions. However, there are areas for improvement to enhance the overall development of the paper, particularly regarding the vulnerable population, statistical significance, and adherence to assignment requirements.

    **Promising Theoretical Framework**:

    · The use of the human ecological model is an excellent choice as it considers multiple levels of influence—individual, interpersonal, community, and societal—on mental health. This comprehensive approach aligns well with the complexities of addressing depression in low-income populations.

    **Cultural Relevance and Accessibility**:

    · The submission highlights the importance of culturally tailored interventions and community-based approaches, such as peer support and task-shifting. These strategies are effective in improving treatment adherence and overcoming barriers faced by disadvantaged communities.

    **Integration of Evidence-Based Interventions**:

    · The literature review incorporates practical interventions like peer support and task-shifting, with both approaches showing measurable benefits in mental health outcomes. This shows thoughtfulness in applying evidence to address the issue.

    **Areas for Improvement:**

    1.
    **Insufficient Number of References**:

    · The student did not include the required minimum of six scholarly references, which negatively affected the paper’s development. Without meeting this requirement, the paper lacks the depth and breadth of evidence needed to fully support the proposed strategies. Adding more peer-reviewed studies, especially those addressing diverse geographic areas and long-term impacts, would strengthen the submission.

    **Underdeveloped Vulnerable Population Description**:

    · The vulnerable population section does not sufficiently explore specific groups or provide detailed statistical evidence of their risk factors. Including more data, such as prevalence rates of untreated depression among low-income individuals or disparities in healthcare access, would enhance the significance of the discussion.

    **Limited Statistical Context**:

    · The submission includes brief mentions of depression rates, but it lacks robust statistical support. Incorporating detailed statistics and trends, such as rates of untreated depression or disparities in mental health outcomes, would add weight to the argument and make the issue’s scope more compelling.

    **Lack of Measurable Program Objectives**:

    · While the submission discusses general strategies for addressing depression, it would benefit from setting clear, measurable objectives. For example, establishing goals such as a percentage increase in treatment adherence or reduction in depressive symptoms over a specific timeframe would add clarity and focus to the proposal.

    **Sustainability Strategies**:

    · The paper should elaborate on how interventions like task-shifting and peer support can be sustained long-term, such as through funding mechanisms, policy advocacy, or partnerships with community organizations.

    **Suggested Strategies and Areas for Improvement:**

    **Expand References**:

    · Include additional scholarly articles addressing depression interventions, such as those exploring long-term outcomes, rural populations, or policy-based approaches. Platforms like PubMed, JSTOR, and PsycINFO can be utilized for locating relevant studies.

    **Enhance the Vulnerable Population Section**:

    · Provide a more detailed and data-driven analysis of the low-income population's risk factors, including statistics on depression prevalence, healthcare access gaps, and social determinants of health.

    **Incorporate Statistical Context**:

    · Use credible sources to provide detailed statistics on untreated depression, disparities in mental health treatment, and outcomes among low-income populations.

    **Define Specific Objectives**:

    · Set measurable program goals, such as increasing access to mental health services or achieving a particular improvement in depression symptoms among participants.

    **Focus on Sustainability**:

    · Develop a plan for sustaining interventions through funding, community partnerships, and policy reforms.

    **Resources for Improvement:**

    **University Writing Center**:

    · Schedule one-on-one tutoring sessions for feedback on expanding content, improving statistical analysis, and addressing gaps in development.

    **Library Databases**:

    · Use academic resources like PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar to identify additional articles and evidence to enhance the literature review.

    This submission demonstrates a solid foundation for addressing depression through community-based interventions and culturally relevant strategies. However, addressing the insufficient number of references, enhancing the vulnerable population section, and incorporating detailed statistical evidence would significantly improve the paper’s depth and impact.

    Show more

    Rubric

    Rubric Result

    **87.2/ 100**

    ·
    **Integration of Knowledge**

    25% of total result

    **20**

    **Satisfactory**

    The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. Questions were not fully developed but concepts are explained well.

    ·
    **Topic Focus**

    25% of total result

    **25**

    **Excellent**

    The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.

    ·
    **Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness**

    25% of total result

    **20**

    **Satisfactory**

    In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.

    ·
    **Sources**

    7% of total result

    **4.2**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    Used 4 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible.

    ·
    **APA adherence and Citation in text**

    6% of total result

    **6**

    **Excellent**

    Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors

    ·
    **Spelling and Grammar**

    12% of total result

    **12**

    **Excellent**

    Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met.

    **## DepressioninLow.edited1.pdf**

    1

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Eliecer M Rodriguez

    FNU

    Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

    Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo

    March 15, 2025

    2

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Depression is a severe mental disorder that affects so many people across the globe. It is

    especially common among poor people, who often live under tremendous stress and financial

    difficulty and with limited access to mental health care. Depression is one of the significant

    causes of disability, as reported by the World Health Organization, and it affects about over 200

    million people globally. In the US, data from the National Institute of Mental Health shows that

    people living in poverty are more than twice as likely to experience depression as those with

    more income. This proposal will seek to improve mental health among poor people through

    depression education, building community support networks, and increasing access to mental

    health services. The expected result is a decrease in the number of people suffering from

    depression and their mental health improvement. It will be measured by tracking the number of

    people participating in the program and having better access to mental health care.

    Vulnerable Population

    Poor people are more vulnerable to depression due to the various challenges they

    encounter, including economic instability, limited healthcare access, and poor living conditions.

    Economic instability leads to stress, thus increasing the risk of mental illness development. Most

    people in poor communities struggle with basic needs such as food, suitable housing, and

    employment (Martinez et al., 2021). Such social determinants of health make it difficult to enjoy

    good mental health. Furthermore, people in poverty do not access professional mental health

    services due to unaffordability, stigma, and lack of awareness of the services available, thus the

    high rate of untreated depression. Racial and ethnic minority groups among people with low

    incomes suffer even more significant disparities in mental health care. Research conducted by

    the American Psychological Association shows that African American and Hispanic patients

    3

    have more untreated depression than white patients (American Psychological Association, 2017).

    It is due to social issues, dialect boundaries, and systemic inequalities in healthcare access.

    Review of Literature

    Giebel et al. (2022) researched how community-based interventions affect depression

    treatment in low-income communities. It showed that peer support methods and culturally

    adjusted therapy improved mental health outcomes. Depression patients received peer support

    interventions that connected them to others having depression experience so they would develop

    improved feelings while reducing their isolation perception. The treatment interventions went

    through cultural adaptation to fit the orientation of each participant, thus making them more

    accessible and acceptable. Research showed that group therapeutic activities and social support

    groups created the most successful act of treatment adherence. The participants exposed to

    intervention techniques were likelier to maintain therapy appointments, join therapeutic

    discussions, and adhere to treatment protocols. Symptom of become less among the unprivileged

    due to therapy interventions that provided them with both emotional support and coping

    mechanisms. Furthermore, Matteo Bessone et al. (2024) also researched the application of

    depression care techniques that involved task-shifting with trained lay health workers. Shift

    supervision strategies require non skilled staff to take over certain functions that were previously

    allocated to a psychologist after being taught to them. The use of such care services was made

    easier through this method for patients who were both challenged in receiving care from trained

    non-staffs managed to significantly improve the intensity of their depression. The teachers

    provided counseling services accompanied with education and emotional support to the patients.

    In addition, trained health workers attended to patients who were able to use techniques for

    4

    symptom relieve. The success of task shifting shows that even a small amount of training in

    mental healthcare can enable non-professionals to provide basic care.

    Evaluation of Literature

    Research performed by Giebel et al. (2022) and the study reported by Bessone et al.

    (2024) collectively produce significant findings about successful mental health treatment

    methods aimed at low-income populations dealing with depressive symptoms. According to

    Giebel et al. (2022) successful mental health intervention programs need to develop specific

    cultural approaches treating social along with psychological mental health risk factors. The

    research demonstrates that peer support best practices foster community membership while

    lowering stigma which results in superior treatment results. This research study investigates

    urban populations only so it cannot provide complete results about depression experiences in

    rural low-income populations.

    Bessone et al. (2024) introduce a cost-effective system by developing lay health

    employees to deliver mental health support to communities that lack access to qualified medical

    providers. Communities with critical specialist shortages find this approach beneficial because it

    creates broad access to essential services. The approach decreases pressure on the healthcare

    system by using community members to deliver implemented interventions. The efficacy of this

    intervention depends on both the implementation of quality training sessions for lay health

    workers and adequate supervision programs. The combination of peer support initiatives with

    trained non-specialist mental health employees represents the most practical solution for

    reducing depression rates in low-income communities. Community-based peer support, together

    with trained non-specialist mental health workers, presents a possible solution to health care

    deficits through effective and reachable services. A combined model would utilize culturally

    5

    specific interventions by task-sharing the workload to address professional shortages. Several

    support systems incorporated into this strategy would create comprehensive care that produces

    better mental health results for disadvantaged people in city and country areas.

    Theoretical Framework

    The human ecological model acts as a framework for fully considering the many different

    factors that affect an individual’s mental health, and it is particularly useful in dealing with

    depression among lower socioeconomic groups. It deals with problems at several levels;

    individual, interpersonal, community, and societal, which increases the likelihood of developing

    feasible solutions (Kleinman et al., 2023). Individual educational intervention on depression and

    coping techniques represents the most fundamental and essential form of psychiatric care. A

    significant portion of the low income population has a major health literacy problem which is a

    combination of not knowing and misunderstanding the services that are offered. Using

    workshops, webinars, and local community programs assist them in recognizing their problems

    and taking initiative to receive appropriate care.

    Moreover, passing on useful skills in problem-solving, and resilience training equips

    individuals to navigate a range of life challenges effectively. Addressing mental health issues at

    the personal level puts the groundwork for self-care practices and reduces the incidence of

    untreated depression. Supportive relationships are crucial in safeguarding against depression and

    mitigating the effects of loneliness and economic hardships. A scalable mental health care

    system necessitates collaborative efforts with community clinics, faith-based organizations, and

    non-profits, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas, to enhance the availability of

    services. Task-shifting offers a viable solution to the shortage of specialized health professionals

    by equipping general healthcare providers with essential skills for delivering mental health

    6

    services. Policy reforms must tackle limitations in insurance coverage and the integration of

    primary care services to ensure comprehensive mental health support. The proposed style,

    grounded in the SEM, aims to put various involvement that will improve accessibility and

    sustainability, and reducing depression among low-income populations.

    7

    References

    American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethnic and Racial Minorities & Socioeconomic

    Status. American Psychological Association.

    https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/minorities

    Giebel, C., Shrestha, N., Reilly, S., White, R. G., Zuluaga, M. I., Saldarriaga, G., Liu, G., Allen,

    D., & Gabbay, M. (2022). Community-based mental health and well-being interventions

    for older adults in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-

    analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 773. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03453-1

    Kleinman, M. B., Anvari, M. S., Seitz-Brown, C. J., Bradley, V. D., Tralka, H., Felton, J. W.,

    Belcher, A. M., Greenblatt, A. D., & Magidson, J. F. (2023). Psychosocial challenges

    affecting patient-defined medication for opioid use disorder treatment outcomes in a low-

    income, underserved population: Application of the social-ecological framework. Journal

    of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 149, 209046.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2023.209046

    Martinez, S. M., Esaryk, E. E., Moffat, L., & Ritchie, L. (2021). Redefining Basic Needs for

    Higher Education: It is More Than Minimal Food and Housing According to California

    University Students. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 089011712199229.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117121992295

    Matteo Bessone, Bianco, F. L., & Gianluca D'Amico. (2024). Transforming clinical psychology:

    An ecological and psychopolitical perspective. An Italian and global case. RIVISTA DI

    PSICOLOGIA CLINICA, 1, 35–60. https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2024oa18051

    Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    6 references required- 5 used but inly 4 were current

    – Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice
    – Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo
    – References

    **## HealthPromotionProposalpart2.docx**

    **Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2**

    **This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one**, which you submitted previously.

    Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.

    **Directions**

    You have already completed the steps 1-4.
    **Do not resubmit part 1.** Make sure you incorporate any suggested revisions or improvements into your submission according to your instructor’s comments.

    **For this assignment develop criteria 5-8 as detailed below:**

    **You will submit just this section 5-8 as an essay. Please do not resubmit Part 1.**

    Use a presentation page. Start the body of content with topic 5.

    · 5. Propose a health promotion program using an evidence-based intervention found in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which includes resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

    · Be certain to include a timeline. (3 to 4 paragraphs- you may use bullets if appropriate).

    · 6. Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach.
    **The SMART goal statement should be no more than one sentence** (1 paragraph).

    · 7. Provide a detailed plan for the evaluation of each outcome. (2-3 paragraphs).

    · 8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges. (2+ paragraphs).

    · Finish the paper with a conclusion paragraph (2 paragraphs) without typing the word "conclusion" before the paragraph.

    **Paper Requirements**

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. Remember, your Proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school-level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about health promotion.

    **APA must be strictly followed.**

    **Your final assignment should be minimally 5 pages (excluding title page and references).**

    **Finish the essay with your reference page.**

    **6 references**

    **Please review the Grading Rubric for this Assignment.**

    **## Attemptfeedback.docx**

    Attempt feedback

    This submission shows commendable efforts in addressing depression among low-income populations and proposing community-based interventions. However, there are areas for improvement to enhance the overall development of the paper, particularly regarding the vulnerable population, statistical significance, and adherence to assignment requirements.

    **Promising Theoretical Framework**:

    · The use of the human ecological model is an excellent choice as it considers multiple levels of influence—individual, interpersonal, community, and societal—on mental health. This comprehensive approach aligns well with the complexities of addressing depression in low-income populations.

    **Cultural Relevance and Accessibility**:

    · The submission highlights the importance of culturally tailored interventions and community-based approaches, such as peer support and task-shifting. These strategies are effective in improving treatment adherence and overcoming barriers faced by disadvantaged communities.

    **Integration of Evidence-Based Interventions**:

    · The literature review incorporates practical interventions like peer support and task-shifting, with both approaches showing measurable benefits in mental health outcomes. This shows thoughtfulness in applying evidence to address the issue.

    **Areas for Improvement:**

    1.
    **Insufficient Number of References**:

    · The student did not include the required minimum of six scholarly references, which negatively affected the paper’s development. Without meeting this requirement, the paper lacks the depth and breadth of evidence needed to fully support the proposed strategies. Adding more peer-reviewed studies, especially those addressing diverse geographic areas and long-term impacts, would strengthen the submission.

    **Underdeveloped Vulnerable Population Description**:

    · The vulnerable population section does not sufficiently explore specific groups or provide detailed statistical evidence of their risk factors. Including more data, such as prevalence rates of untreated depression among low-income individuals or disparities in healthcare access, would enhance the significance of the discussion.

    **Limited Statistical Context**:

    · The submission includes brief mentions of depression rates, but it lacks robust statistical support. Incorporating detailed statistics and trends, such as rates of untreated depression or disparities in mental health outcomes, would add weight to the argument and make the issue’s scope more compelling.

    **Lack of Measurable Program Objectives**:

    · While the submission discusses general strategies for addressing depression, it would benefit from setting clear, measurable objectives. For example, establishing goals such as a percentage increase in treatment adherence or reduction in depressive symptoms over a specific timeframe would add clarity and focus to the proposal.

    **Sustainability Strategies**:

    · The paper should elaborate on how interventions like task-shifting and peer support can be sustained long-term, such as through funding mechanisms, policy advocacy, or partnerships with community organizations.

    **Suggested Strategies and Areas for Improvement:**

    **Expand References**:

    · Include additional scholarly articles addressing depression interventions, such as those exploring long-term outcomes, rural populations, or policy-based approaches. Platforms like PubMed, JSTOR, and PsycINFO can be utilized for locating relevant studies.

    **Enhance the Vulnerable Population Section**:

    · Provide a more detailed and data-driven analysis of the low-income population's risk factors, including statistics on depression prevalence, healthcare access gaps, and social determinants of health.

    **Incorporate Statistical Context**:

    · Use credible sources to provide detailed statistics on untreated depression, disparities in mental health treatment, and outcomes among low-income populations.

    **Define Specific Objectives**:

    · Set measurable program goals, such as increasing access to mental health services or achieving a particular improvement in depression symptoms among participants.

    **Focus on Sustainability**:

    · Develop a plan for sustaining interventions through funding, community partnerships, and policy reforms.

    **Resources for Improvement:**

    **University Writing Center**:

    · Schedule one-on-one tutoring sessions for feedback on expanding content, improving statistical analysis, and addressing gaps in development.

    **Library Databases**:

    · Use academic resources like PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar to identify additional articles and evidence to enhance the literature review.

    This submission demonstrates a solid foundation for addressing depression through community-based interventions and culturally relevant strategies. However, addressing the insufficient number of references, enhancing the vulnerable population section, and incorporating detailed statistical evidence would significantly improve the paper’s depth and impact.

    Show more

    Rubric

    Rubric Result

    **87.2/ 100**

    ·
    **Integration of Knowledge**

    25% of total result

    **20**

    **Satisfactory**

    The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. Questions were not fully developed but concepts are explained well.

    ·
    **Topic Focus**

    25% of total result

    **25**

    **Excellent**

    The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.

    ·
    **Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness**

    25% of total result

    **20**

    **Satisfactory**

    In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.

    ·
    **Sources**

    7% of total result

    **4.2**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    Used 4 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible.

    ·
    **APA adherence and Citation in text**

    6% of total result

    **6**

    **Excellent**

    Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors

    ·
    **Spelling and Grammar**

    12% of total result

    **12**

    **Excellent**

    Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met.

    **## DepressioninLow.edited1.pdf**

    1

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Eliecer M Rodriguez

    FNU

    Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice

    Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo

    March 15, 2025

    2

    Depression in Low-Income Communities

    Depression is a severe mental disorder that affects so many people across the globe. It is

    especially common among poor people, who often live under tremendous stress and financial

    difficulty and with limited access to mental health care. Depression is one of the significant

    causes of disability, as reported by the World Health Organization, and it affects about over 200

    million people globally. In the US, data from the National Institute of Mental Health shows that

    people living in poverty are more than twice as likely to experience depression as those with

    more income. This proposal will seek to improve mental health among poor people through

    depression education, building community support networks, and increasing access to mental

    health services. The expected result is a decrease in the number of people suffering from

    depression and their mental health improvement. It will be measured by tracking the number of

    people participating in the program and having better access to mental health care.

    Vulnerable Population

    Poor people are more vulnerable to depression due to the various challenges they

    encounter, including economic instability, limited healthcare access, and poor living conditions.

    Economic instability leads to stress, thus increasing the risk of mental illness development. Most

    people in poor communities struggle with basic needs such as food, suitable housing, and

    employment (Martinez et al., 2021). Such social determinants of health make it difficult to enjoy

    good mental health. Furthermore, people in poverty do not access professional mental health

    services due to unaffordability, stigma, and lack of awareness of the services available, thus the

    high rate of untreated depression. Racial and ethnic minority groups among people with low

    incomes suffer even more significant disparities in mental health care. Research conducted by

    the American Psychological Association shows that African American and Hispanic patients

    3

    have more untreated depression than white patients (American Psychological Association, 2017).

    It is due to social issues, dialect boundaries, and systemic inequalities in healthcare access.

    Review of Literature

    Giebel et al. (2022) researched how community-based interventions affect depression

    treatment in low-income communities. It showed that peer support methods and culturally

    adjusted therapy improved mental health outcomes. Depression patients received peer support

    interventions that connected them to others having depression experience so they would develop

    improved feelings while reducing their isolation perception. The treatment interventions went

    through cultural adaptation to fit the orientation of each participant, thus making them more

    accessible and acceptable. Research showed that group therapeutic activities and social support

    groups created the most successful act of treatment adherence. The participants exposed to

    intervention techniques were likelier to maintain therapy appointments, join therapeutic

    discussions, and adhere to treatment protocols. Symptom of become less among the unprivileged

    due to therapy interventions that provided them with both emotional support and coping

    mechanisms. Furthermore, Matteo Bessone et al. (2024) also researched the application of

    depression care techniques that involved task-shifting with trained lay health workers. Shift

    supervision strategies require non skilled staff to take over certain functions that were previously

    allocated to a psychologist after being taught to them. The use of such care services was made

    easier through this method for patients who were both challenged in receiving care from trained

    non-staffs managed to significantly improve the intensity of their depression. The teachers

    provided counseling services accompanied with education and emotional support to the patients.

    In addition, trained health workers attended to patients who were able to use techniques for

    4

    symptom relieve. The success of task shifting shows that even a small amount of training in

    mental healthcare can enable non-professionals to provide basic care.

    Evaluation of Literature

    Research performed by Giebel et al. (2022) and the study reported by Bessone et al.

    (2024) collectively produce significant findings about successful mental health treatment

    methods aimed at low-income populations dealing with depressive symptoms. According to

    Giebel et al. (2022) successful mental health intervention programs need to develop specific

    cultural approaches treating social along with psychological mental health risk factors. The

    research demonstrates that peer support best practices foster community membership while

    lowering stigma which results in superior treatment results. This research study investigates

    urban populations only so it cannot provide complete results about depression experiences in

    rural low-income populations.

    Bessone et al. (2024) introduce a cost-effective system by developing lay health

    employees to deliver mental health support to communities that lack access to qualified medical

    providers. Communities with critical specialist shortages find this approach beneficial because it

    creates broad access to essential services. The approach decreases pressure on the healthcare

    system by using community members to deliver implemented interventions. The efficacy of this

    intervention depends on both the implementation of quality training sessions for lay health

    workers and adequate supervision programs. The combination of peer support initiatives with

    trained non-specialist mental health employees represents the most practical solution for

    reducing depression rates in low-income communities. Community-based peer support, together

    with trained non-specialist mental health workers, presents a possible solution to health care

    deficits through effective and reachable services. A combined model would utilize culturally

    5

    specific interventions by task-sharing the workload to address professional shortages. Several

    support systems incorporated into this strategy would create comprehensive care that produces

    better mental health results for disadvantaged people in city and country areas.

    Theoretical Framework

    The human ecological model acts as a framework for fully considering the many different

    factors that affect an individual’s mental health, and it is particularly useful in dealing with

    depression among lower socioeconomic groups. It deals with problems at several levels;

    individual, interpersonal, community, and societal, which increases the likelihood of developing

    feasible solutions (Kleinman et al., 2023). Individual educational intervention on depression and

    coping techniques represents the most fundamental and essential form of psychiatric care. A

    significant portion of the low income population has a major health literacy problem which is a

    combination of not knowing and misunderstanding the services that are offered. Using

    workshops, webinars, and local community programs assist them in recognizing their problems

    and taking initiative to receive appropriate care.

    Moreover, passing on useful skills in problem-solving, and resilience training equips

    individuals to navigate a range of life challenges effectively. Addressing mental health issues at

    the personal level puts the groundwork for self-care practices and reduces the incidence of

    untreated depression. Supportive relationships are crucial in safeguarding against depression and

    mitigating the effects of loneliness and economic hardships. A scalable mental health care

    system necessitates collaborative efforts with community clinics, faith-based organizations, and

    non-profits, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas, to enhance the availability of

    services. Task-shifting offers a viable solution to the shortage of specialized health professionals

    by equipping general healthcare providers with essential skills for delivering mental health

    6

    services. Policy reforms must tackle limitations in insurance coverage and the integration of

    primary care services to ensure comprehensive mental health support. The proposed style,

    grounded in the SEM, aims to put various involvement that will improve accessibility and

    sustainability, and reducing depression among low-income populations.

    7

    References

    American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethnic and Racial Minorities & Socioeconomic

    Status. American Psychological Association.

    https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/minorities

    Giebel, C., Shrestha, N., Reilly, S., White, R. G., Zuluaga, M. I., Saldarriaga, G., Liu, G., Allen,

    D., & Gabbay, M. (2022). Community-based mental health and well-being interventions

    for older adults in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-

    analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 773. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03453-1

    Kleinman, M. B., Anvari, M. S., Seitz-Brown, C. J., Bradley, V. D., Tralka, H., Felton, J. W.,

    Belcher, A. M., Greenblatt, A. D., & Magidson, J. F. (2023). Psychosocial challenges

    affecting patient-defined medication for opioid use disorder treatment outcomes in a low-

    income, underserved population: Application of the social-ecological framework. Journal

    of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 149, 209046.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2023.209046

    Martinez, S. M., Esaryk, E. E., Moffat, L., & Ritchie, L. (2021). Redefining Basic Needs for

    Higher Education: It is More Than Minimal Food and Housing According to California

    University Students. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 089011712199229.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117121992295

    Matteo Bessone, Bianco, F. L., & Gianluca D'Amico. (2024). Transforming clinical psychology:

    An ecological and psychopolitical perspective. An Italian and global case. RIVISTA DI

    PSICOLOGIA CLINICA, 1, 35–60. https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2024oa18051

    Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    6 references required- 5 used but inly 4 were current

    – Health Promotion & Role Development in Adv. Nursing Practice
    – Professor: Nora Hernandez Pupo
    – References

  • [Solved] BJ week 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    bj week 7 – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## Unit7-KTAPart3WorksheetTemplate.docx – ## TheCriticalRoleofNursesinImprovingMedicationAdherence111.docx – Module51.docx **## Unit7-KTAPart3WorksheetTemplate.docx** **NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures** Instructions: Utilize the temp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    bj week 7

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## Unit7-KTAPart3WorksheetTemplate.docx

    – ## TheCriticalRoleofNursesinImprovingMedicationAdherence111.docx

    – Module51.docx

    **## Unit7-KTAPart3WorksheetTemplate.docx**

    **NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures**

    Instructions: Utilize the template to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment.

    **NAME OF Suzie Q. Student, RN, BSN**

    **STUDENT:**

    **Part 1: Questions**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Questions:** | **Type Answers in the Spaces below-you may bullet when possible; leave out any “fluff” as this should be a quick glance summary of the project/process** |
    | 1. <br>**Describe the practice problem you identified for the Unit 4 assignment (with in-text citation)** | Provide a condensed description of the practice setting and problem provided in the article chosen from <br>**Unit 4** (with in-text citation). Basic data is needed to support the existence of the problem (with in-text citation) |
    | 2. <br>**Provide a brief overview of the alternate intervention you identified for the Unit 5 assignment (with in-text citations)** | Explain what the literature says about the selected intervention (with in-text citations).<br>Basically, condense the literature summary from Unit 5. |
    | 3. Provide a succinct Aim Statement for the improvement process you would launch for implementing your identified alternate intervention. Use the link below to access IHI Worksheet to guide creation of this succinct (one line) statement.<br>[https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/IHITool_Aim-Statement-Worksheet.pdf](https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/IHITool_Aim-Statement-Worksheet.pdf) | One Sentence Statement:<br>Ex: By January 31, 2020, of children under the age of 12 for whom a Health Needs Assessment is recommended, 95% will receive the assessment in Middlesex County (IHI, 2019)<br>*Note the AIM is SMART: this is the direction of what we want to achieve<br>Specific<br>Measurable<br>Attainable<br>Realistic<br>Time-limited |
    | 4. Discuss who will be involved in the improvement process, and why. Utilize a minimum of one resource to support this discussion (in-text citation). | Explain how to develop a diverse improvement process team (with in-text citation). Patient/families can be part of the team.<br>· List the team members & their role <br>· List the rationale for their inclusion<br>Ex: Team Members:<br>1. Graduate Student<br>· Role-Team Leader<br>· Rationale-IT Expert<br>Here is a great resource to guide this discussion for your alternative improvement process: <br>[https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-forming-team](https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-forming-team) |
    | 5. What measure(s) will you utilize to evaluate the outcome of implementing your identified alternate intervention? Provide a rationale why you selected/identified the measure(s). Use the link below to access IHI’s resource on Improvement Measures.<br>[https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-establishing-measures](https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-establishing-measures) | Present the quality measure(s) with data collection methods and the rationale for why you chose this/these method(s).<br>**Outcome measure**-Shows how the system is impacting patient. Links back to the numeric goal within the aim statement; typically, there is one outcome measure.<br> <br>· <br>Method: Ex: Likert surveys, pre/post surveys, rates<br> <br>· <br>Rationale: explain why choosing an outcome measure and rationale for the type of data being collected.<br> <br>**Process measure**-Are the current processes effective; looks at the parts/steps in the system <br> <br>· <br>Method: Ex: chart review, qualitative surveys<br> <br>· <br>Rationale: explain why choosing a process measure and rationale for the type of data being collected. |
    | 6. What is your desired outcome from implementing your alternate intervention? | What is tangible evidence the AIM has been met; what you personally would want to achieve from the implementation of this intervention if done in a real-world setting. What did YOU learn from this theoretical quality improvement project? Personalize this section. |

    **Part 2: APA Reference List**

    Please provide a minimum of 3 APA references that correspond with citations within the table. Use APA format.

    **References**

    **## TheCriticalRoleofNursesinImprovingMedicationAdherence111.docx**

    2

    **The Critical Role of Nurses in Improving Medication Adherence for Stroke Patients**

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU700 Knowledge for Nursing Practice

    Module 4 Resubmission

    Dr. Jessica Clark

    04/08/2025

    **The Critical Role of Nurses in Improving Medication Adherence for Stroke Patients**

    **Introduction**

    Medication nonadherence in stroke survivors is a significant public health issue, and studies suggest that 30-50% of patients do not follow prescribed regimens, resulting in avoidable complications (Arkan et al., 2022). This is a critical concern since the secondary risk for stroke significantly increases when drugs like antihypertensives and anticoagulants are not appropriately taken. Nurses, the first point of contact in health care, have a unique chance to act on this threat through systematic action. Ongoing patient interaction provides real-time evaluation of challenges such as cognitive impairment, budget constraints, and literacy levels (Berardinelli et al., 2024). Targeted education with follow-up enables nurses to act at the right moment to reduce the risk of nonadherence. Medication nonadherence undermines not only individual patient outcomes but also overburdens the health systems with recurrent hospitalization and prolonged recovery. Nurses have excellent chances to detect signs of nonadherence early in their routine care interactions. By detecting it early, they can decrease readmission and healthcare costs. Their ability to visualize the cycle of patient needs enables them to develop tailored approaches that bridge knowledge gaps and improve long-term adherence.

    **Practice Problem Overview**

    Medication nonadherence among stroke patients is a complex problem driven by medical, psychological, and socioeconomic determinants. Arkan et al. (2022) established that merely 33.9% of stroke patients showed high adherence, and fear of side effects and lack of confidence in medication overuse were the main discourages. Post-stroke cognitive impairments further complicate compliance by disrupting memories regarding dosing or treatment needs. In addition, cumbersome multidrug regimens on a frequent schedule—a frequent regimen in stroke—induce more confusion and omissions (Kumar et al., 2024). A crossover between supervised medication is a sensitive, vulnerable point during in-hospital treatments. In the absence of proper support, there is a high risk of recurrence, disability, and death, which further provides a rationale for consistent nursing interventions. Most patients are sent home without sufficient support systems, and this heightens the likelihood of missing medication or abandoning it altogether. Most stroke survivors battle depression or anxiety, which also influences motivation to adhere to multifaceted regimens. Without structured guidance, even patients with good intentions will default on treatment. This fact highlights the importance of nurses acting as continued contact points for medication management after discharge.

    **Literature Review: Potential Intervention**

    Evidence indicates that interventions by nurses are highly effective at encouraging medication compliance among stroke survivors. Interventions typically integrate patient education, regimen simplification, and technological support to overcome multifactorial barriers to adherence. Berardinelli et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review of patients with chronic diseases, noting that patient education by a nurse in the face-to-face format significantly improved adherence, with particularly robust increases in patients with stroke and cardiovascular diseases. They recognized that nurses' ability to deliver personalized education on medication aims, potential side effects, and dosing time helped to moderate patients' misconceptions and concerns, which are crucial risk factors for nonadherence (Arkan et al., 2022). The teach-back method, under which patients repeat instructions to them in their own words verbally, was very effective for stroke patients with cognitive impairments. Informational personalization of the patient's level of functioning is one of the strongest points of nurse-initiated interventions. By using everyday language, visual aids, and interactive teaching modalities, nurses ensure maximum knowledge retention in patients with cognitive impairments. Second, follow-up frequently helps strengthen learning and enforces accountability. Combined, these steps turn information into action plans that patients can uphold outside the clinical setting.

    Technology-enabled nurse interventions were also seen as promising. Zhang et al. (2024) compared several randomized controlled trials of eHealth programs delivered by nurses and registered a 50% reduction in missed doses using digital reminders and virtual follow-up. These programs increased adherence and functional recovery by engaging the patients in the rehabilitation program. Kumar et al. (2024) also demonstrated that structured nurse involvement in stroke care teams led to decreased treatment intervals and higher medication adherence rates, notably risky medication like anticoagulants. Their meta-analysis reported that nurse-led protocols reduced door-to-needle times by nearly 20 minutes and enhanced functional outcomes at three months in the same breath. Online platforms enable nurses to monitor compliance in real-time and initiate timely interventions as required. These systems also engage patients with reminders and progress feedback, enhancing a more incredible feeling of control. Of equal importance is the reality that virtual programs led by nurses remove the burden of transport and scheduling inconvenience, particularly for stroke survivors who have limited mobility. This accessibility ensures that more patients receive organized, ongoing care.

    The interventions work because nurses' unique role is to provide uninterrupted, patient-centered care. By combining education with evidence-based support interventions such as simplified dosing regimens, reminding, and motivational interviewing, the practical and psychological barriers to adherence can be overcome by nurses (Berardinelli et al., 2024). This integrated approach is particularly vital for stroke patients who have complex medication schedules to add to their cognitive and physical impairment. The literature consistently supports nurse-implemented interventions to reduce preventable complications and improve long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.

    **Conclusion**

    Medication nonadherence among stroke patients is a highly complex issue of life-and-death consequences. Nurses with evidence-based practice measures like customized education are the best professionals to address this issue. In the literature review, the efficacy of nurse-implemented interventions for improving adherence, reducing the number of stroke recurrences, and enhancing the quality of life in patients is promoted. With the application of these interventions, nurses can implement research into practice and assist patients in receiving the support they need to manage their medications effectively.

    References

    Arkan, G., Ordin, Y. S., Ozturk, V., & Ala, R. T. (2022). Investigation of medication adherence and factors affecting it in patients with stroke.
    _Journal of Neuroscience Nursing_,
    _54_(1), 35-41.
    [https://journals.lww.com/jnnonline/fulltext/2022/02000/investigation_of_medication_adherence_and_factors.8.aspx](https://journals.lww.com/jnnonline/fulltext/2022/02000/investigation_of_medication_adherence_and_factors.8.aspx)

    Berardinelli, D., Conti, A., Hasnaoui, A., Casabona, E., Martin, B., Campagna, S., & Dimonte, V. (2024, November). Nurse-Led Interventions for Improving Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. In
    _Healthcare_ (Vol. 12, No. 23, p. 2337). MDPI.
    [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641167/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641167/)

    Kumar, A., Kumar, M., Verma, P., Pal, R., Nagi, M., Mahesh, K. V., … & Khurana, D. (2024). Effects of stroke nurse-led acute stroke management on treatment time benchmarks, intravenous thrombolysis rates, and patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases_, 108216.
    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006591](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006591)

    Zhang, W., Mei, Z., Feng, Z., & Li, B. (2024). Effects of a nurse-led health program on functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with stroke: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    _Frontiers in Public Health_,
    _12_, 1395270.
    [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270/full](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270/full)

    **Module51.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module51-docx-10264929)

    **Module51.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module51-docx-10264929)

    **## Unit7-KTAPart3WorksheetTemplate.docx**

    **NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures**

    Instructions: Utilize the template to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment.

    **NAME OF Suzie Q. Student, RN, BSN**

    **STUDENT:**

    **Part 1: Questions**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Questions:** | **Type Answers in the Spaces below-you may bullet when possible; leave out any “fluff” as this should be a quick glance summary of the project/process** |
    | 1. <br>**Describe the practice problem you identified for the Unit 4 assignment (with in-text citation)** | Provide a condensed description of the practice setting and problem provided in the article chosen from <br>**Unit 4** (with in-text citation). Basic data is needed to support the existence of the problem (with in-text citation) |
    | 2. <br>**Provide a brief overview of the alternate intervention you identified for the Unit 5 assignment (with in-text citations)** | Explain what the literature says about the selected intervention (with in-text citations).<br>Basically, condense the literature summary from Unit 5. |
    | 3. Provide a succinct Aim Statement for the improvement process you would launch for implementing your identified alternate intervention. Use the link below to access IHI Worksheet to guide creation of this succinct (one line) statement.<br>[https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/IHITool_Aim-Statement-Worksheet.pdf](https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/IHITool_Aim-Statement-Worksheet.pdf) | One Sentence Statement:<br>Ex: By January 31, 2020, of children under the age of 12 for whom a Health Needs Assessment is recommended, 95% will receive the assessment in Middlesex County (IHI, 2019)<br>*Note the AIM is SMART: this is the direction of what we want to achieve<br>Specific<br>Measurable<br>Attainable<br>Realistic<br>Time-limited |
    | 4. Discuss who will be involved in the improvement process, and why. Utilize a minimum of one resource to support this discussion (in-text citation). | Explain how to develop a diverse improvement process team (with in-text citation). Patient/families can be part of the team.<br>· List the team members & their role <br>· List the rationale for their inclusion<br>Ex: Team Members:<br>1. Graduate Student<br>· Role-Team Leader<br>· Rationale-IT Expert<br>Here is a great resource to guide this discussion for your alternative improvement process: <br>[https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-forming-team](https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-forming-team) |
    | 5. What measure(s) will you utilize to evaluate the outcome of implementing your identified alternate intervention? Provide a rationale why you selected/identified the measure(s). Use the link below to access IHI’s resource on Improvement Measures.<br>[https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-establishing-measures](https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-establishing-measures) | Present the quality measure(s) with data collection methods and the rationale for why you chose this/these method(s).<br>**Outcome measure**-Shows how the system is impacting patient. Links back to the numeric goal within the aim statement; typically, there is one outcome measure.<br> <br>· <br>Method: Ex: Likert surveys, pre/post surveys, rates<br> <br>· <br>Rationale: explain why choosing an outcome measure and rationale for the type of data being collected.<br> <br>**Process measure**-Are the current processes effective; looks at the parts/steps in the system <br> <br>· <br>Method: Ex: chart review, qualitative surveys<br> <br>· <br>Rationale: explain why choosing a process measure and rationale for the type of data being collected. |
    | 6. What is your desired outcome from implementing your alternate intervention? | What is tangible evidence the AIM has been met; what you personally would want to achieve from the implementation of this intervention if done in a real-world setting. What did YOU learn from this theoretical quality improvement project? Personalize this section. |

    **Part 2: APA Reference List**

    Please provide a minimum of 3 APA references that correspond with citations within the table. Use APA format.

    **References**

    **## TheCriticalRoleofNursesinImprovingMedicationAdherence111.docx**

    2

    **The Critical Role of Nurses in Improving Medication Adherence for Stroke Patients**

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU700 Knowledge for Nursing Practice

    Module 4 Resubmission

    Dr. Jessica Clark

    04/08/2025

    **The Critical Role of Nurses in Improving Medication Adherence for Stroke Patients**

    **Introduction**

    Medication nonadherence in stroke survivors is a significant public health issue, and studies suggest that 30-50% of patients do not follow prescribed regimens, resulting in avoidable complications (Arkan et al., 2022). This is a critical concern since the secondary risk for stroke significantly increases when drugs like antihypertensives and anticoagulants are not appropriately taken. Nurses, the first point of contact in health care, have a unique chance to act on this threat through systematic action. Ongoing patient interaction provides real-time evaluation of challenges such as cognitive impairment, budget constraints, and literacy levels (Berardinelli et al., 2024). Targeted education with follow-up enables nurses to act at the right moment to reduce the risk of nonadherence. Medication nonadherence undermines not only individual patient outcomes but also overburdens the health systems with recurrent hospitalization and prolonged recovery. Nurses have excellent chances to detect signs of nonadherence early in their routine care interactions. By detecting it early, they can decrease readmission and healthcare costs. Their ability to visualize the cycle of patient needs enables them to develop tailored approaches that bridge knowledge gaps and improve long-term adherence.

    **Practice Problem Overview**

    Medication nonadherence among stroke patients is a complex problem driven by medical, psychological, and socioeconomic determinants. Arkan et al. (2022) established that merely 33.9% of stroke patients showed high adherence, and fear of side effects and lack of confidence in medication overuse were the main discourages. Post-stroke cognitive impairments further complicate compliance by disrupting memories regarding dosing or treatment needs. In addition, cumbersome multidrug regimens on a frequent schedule—a frequent regimen in stroke—induce more confusion and omissions (Kumar et al., 2024). A crossover between supervised medication is a sensitive, vulnerable point during in-hospital treatments. In the absence of proper support, there is a high risk of recurrence, disability, and death, which further provides a rationale for consistent nursing interventions. Most patients are sent home without sufficient support systems, and this heightens the likelihood of missing medication or abandoning it altogether. Most stroke survivors battle depression or anxiety, which also influences motivation to adhere to multifaceted regimens. Without structured guidance, even patients with good intentions will default on treatment. This fact highlights the importance of nurses acting as continued contact points for medication management after discharge.

    **Literature Review: Potential Intervention**

    Evidence indicates that interventions by nurses are highly effective at encouraging medication compliance among stroke survivors. Interventions typically integrate patient education, regimen simplification, and technological support to overcome multifactorial barriers to adherence. Berardinelli et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review of patients with chronic diseases, noting that patient education by a nurse in the face-to-face format significantly improved adherence, with particularly robust increases in patients with stroke and cardiovascular diseases. They recognized that nurses' ability to deliver personalized education on medication aims, potential side effects, and dosing time helped to moderate patients' misconceptions and concerns, which are crucial risk factors for nonadherence (Arkan et al., 2022). The teach-back method, under which patients repeat instructions to them in their own words verbally, was very effective for stroke patients with cognitive impairments. Informational personalization of the patient's level of functioning is one of the strongest points of nurse-initiated interventions. By using everyday language, visual aids, and interactive teaching modalities, nurses ensure maximum knowledge retention in patients with cognitive impairments. Second, follow-up frequently helps strengthen learning and enforces accountability. Combined, these steps turn information into action plans that patients can uphold outside the clinical setting.

    Technology-enabled nurse interventions were also seen as promising. Zhang et al. (2024) compared several randomized controlled trials of eHealth programs delivered by nurses and registered a 50% reduction in missed doses using digital reminders and virtual follow-up. These programs increased adherence and functional recovery by engaging the patients in the rehabilitation program. Kumar et al. (2024) also demonstrated that structured nurse involvement in stroke care teams led to decreased treatment intervals and higher medication adherence rates, notably risky medication like anticoagulants. Their meta-analysis reported that nurse-led protocols reduced door-to-needle times by nearly 20 minutes and enhanced functional outcomes at three months in the same breath. Online platforms enable nurses to monitor compliance in real-time and initiate timely interventions as required. These systems also engage patients with reminders and progress feedback, enhancing a more incredible feeling of control. Of equal importance is the reality that virtual programs led by nurses remove the burden of transport and scheduling inconvenience, particularly for stroke survivors who have limited mobility. This accessibility ensures that more patients receive organized, ongoing care.

    The interventions work because nurses' unique role is to provide uninterrupted, patient-centered care. By combining education with evidence-based support interventions such as simplified dosing regimens, reminding, and motivational interviewing, the practical and psychological barriers to adherence can be overcome by nurses (Berardinelli et al., 2024). This integrated approach is particularly vital for stroke patients who have complex medication schedules to add to their cognitive and physical impairment. The literature consistently supports nurse-implemented interventions to reduce preventable complications and improve long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.

    **Conclusion**

    Medication nonadherence among stroke patients is a highly complex issue of life-and-death consequences. Nurses with evidence-based practice measures like customized education are the best professionals to address this issue. In the literature review, the efficacy of nurse-implemented interventions for improving adherence, reducing the number of stroke recurrences, and enhancing the quality of life in patients is promoted. With the application of these interventions, nurses can implement research into practice and assist patients in receiving the support they need to manage their medications effectively.

    References

    Arkan, G., Ordin, Y. S., Ozturk, V., & Ala, R. T. (2022). Investigation of medication adherence and factors affecting it in patients with stroke.
    _Journal of Neuroscience Nursing_,
    _54_(1), 35-41.
    [https://journals.lww.com/jnnonline/fulltext/2022/02000/investigation_of_medication_adherence_and_factors.8.aspx](https://journals.lww.com/jnnonline/fulltext/2022/02000/investigation_of_medication_adherence_and_factors.8.aspx)

    Berardinelli, D., Conti, A., Hasnaoui, A., Casabona, E., Martin, B., Campagna, S., & Dimonte, V. (2024, November). Nurse-Led Interventions for Improving Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. In
    _Healthcare_ (Vol. 12, No. 23, p. 2337). MDPI.
    [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641167/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641167/)

    Kumar, A., Kumar, M., Verma, P., Pal, R., Nagi, M., Mahesh, K. V., … & Khurana, D. (2024). Effects of stroke nurse-led acute stroke management on treatment time benchmarks, intravenous thrombolysis rates, and patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases_, 108216.
    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006591](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006591)

    Zhang, W., Mei, Z., Feng, Z., & Li, B. (2024). Effects of a nurse-led health program on functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with stroke: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    _Frontiers in Public Health_,
    _12_, 1395270.
    [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270/full](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270/full)

    **Module51.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module51-docx-10264929)

    **## Unit7-KTAPart3WorksheetTemplate.docx**

    **NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures**

    Instructions: Utilize the template to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment.

    **NAME OF Suzie Q. Student, RN, BSN**

    **STUDENT:**

    **Part 1: Questions**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Questions:** | **Type Answers in the Spaces below-you may bullet when possible; leave out any “fluff” as this should be a quick glance summary of the project/process** |
    | 1. <br>**Describe the practice problem you identified for the Unit 4 assignment (with in-text citation)** | Provide a condensed description of the practice setting and problem provided in the article chosen from <br>**Unit 4** (with in-text citation). Basic data is needed to support the existence of the problem (with in-text citation) |
    | 2. <br>**Provide a brief overview of the alternate intervention you identified for the Unit 5 assignment (with in-text citations)** | Explain what the literature says about the selected intervention (with in-text citations).<br>Basically, condense the literature summary from Unit 5. |
    | 3. Provide a succinct Aim Statement for the improvement process you would launch for implementing your identified alternate intervention. Use the link below to access IHI Worksheet to guide creation of this succinct (one line) statement.<br>[https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/IHITool_Aim-Statement-Worksheet.pdf](https://www.ihi.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/IHITool_Aim-Statement-Worksheet.pdf) | One Sentence Statement:<br>Ex: By January 31, 2020, of children under the age of 12 for whom a Health Needs Assessment is recommended, 95% will receive the assessment in Middlesex County (IHI, 2019)<br>*Note the AIM is SMART: this is the direction of what we want to achieve<br>Specific<br>Measurable<br>Attainable<br>Realistic<br>Time-limited |
    | 4. Discuss who will be involved in the improvement process, and why. Utilize a minimum of one resource to support this discussion (in-text citation). | Explain how to develop a diverse improvement process team (with in-text citation). Patient/families can be part of the team.<br>· List the team members & their role <br>· List the rationale for their inclusion<br>Ex: Team Members:<br>1. Graduate Student<br>· Role-Team Leader<br>· Rationale-IT Expert<br>Here is a great resource to guide this discussion for your alternative improvement process: <br>[https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-forming-team](https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-forming-team) |
    | 5. What measure(s) will you utilize to evaluate the outcome of implementing your identified alternate intervention? Provide a rationale why you selected/identified the measure(s). Use the link below to access IHI’s resource on Improvement Measures.<br>[https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-establishing-measures](https://www.ihi.org/how-improve-model-improvement-establishing-measures) | Present the quality measure(s) with data collection methods and the rationale for why you chose this/these method(s).<br>**Outcome measure**-Shows how the system is impacting patient. Links back to the numeric goal within the aim statement; typically, there is one outcome measure.<br> <br>· <br>Method: Ex: Likert surveys, pre/post surveys, rates<br> <br>· <br>Rationale: explain why choosing an outcome measure and rationale for the type of data being collected.<br> <br>**Process measure**-Are the current processes effective; looks at the parts/steps in the system <br> <br>· <br>Method: Ex: chart review, qualitative surveys<br> <br>· <br>Rationale: explain why choosing a process measure and rationale for the type of data being collected. |
    | 6. What is your desired outcome from implementing your alternate intervention? | What is tangible evidence the AIM has been met; what you personally would want to achieve from the implementation of this intervention if done in a real-world setting. What did YOU learn from this theoretical quality improvement project? Personalize this section. |

    **Part 2: APA Reference List**

    Please provide a minimum of 3 APA references that correspond with citations within the table. Use APA format.

    **References**

    **## TheCriticalRoleofNursesinImprovingMedicationAdherence111.docx**

    2

    **The Critical Role of Nurses in Improving Medication Adherence for Stroke Patients**

    Beverly Jordan

    Herzing University

    NU700 Knowledge for Nursing Practice

    Module 4 Resubmission

    Dr. Jessica Clark

    04/08/2025

    **The Critical Role of Nurses in Improving Medication Adherence for Stroke Patients**

    **Introduction**

    Medication nonadherence in stroke survivors is a significant public health issue, and studies suggest that 30-50% of patients do not follow prescribed regimens, resulting in avoidable complications (Arkan et al., 2022). This is a critical concern since the secondary risk for stroke significantly increases when drugs like antihypertensives and anticoagulants are not appropriately taken. Nurses, the first point of contact in health care, have a unique chance to act on this threat through systematic action. Ongoing patient interaction provides real-time evaluation of challenges such as cognitive impairment, budget constraints, and literacy levels (Berardinelli et al., 2024). Targeted education with follow-up enables nurses to act at the right moment to reduce the risk of nonadherence. Medication nonadherence undermines not only individual patient outcomes but also overburdens the health systems with recurrent hospitalization and prolonged recovery. Nurses have excellent chances to detect signs of nonadherence early in their routine care interactions. By detecting it early, they can decrease readmission and healthcare costs. Their ability to visualize the cycle of patient needs enables them to develop tailored approaches that bridge knowledge gaps and improve long-term adherence.

    **Practice Problem Overview**

    Medication nonadherence among stroke patients is a complex problem driven by medical, psychological, and socioeconomic determinants. Arkan et al. (2022) established that merely 33.9% of stroke patients showed high adherence, and fear of side effects and lack of confidence in medication overuse were the main discourages. Post-stroke cognitive impairments further complicate compliance by disrupting memories regarding dosing or treatment needs. In addition, cumbersome multidrug regimens on a frequent schedule—a frequent regimen in stroke—induce more confusion and omissions (Kumar et al., 2024). A crossover between supervised medication is a sensitive, vulnerable point during in-hospital treatments. In the absence of proper support, there is a high risk of recurrence, disability, and death, which further provides a rationale for consistent nursing interventions. Most patients are sent home without sufficient support systems, and this heightens the likelihood of missing medication or abandoning it altogether. Most stroke survivors battle depression or anxiety, which also influences motivation to adhere to multifaceted regimens. Without structured guidance, even patients with good intentions will default on treatment. This fact highlights the importance of nurses acting as continued contact points for medication management after discharge.

    **Literature Review: Potential Intervention**

    Evidence indicates that interventions by nurses are highly effective at encouraging medication compliance among stroke survivors. Interventions typically integrate patient education, regimen simplification, and technological support to overcome multifactorial barriers to adherence. Berardinelli et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review of patients with chronic diseases, noting that patient education by a nurse in the face-to-face format significantly improved adherence, with particularly robust increases in patients with stroke and cardiovascular diseases. They recognized that nurses' ability to deliver personalized education on medication aims, potential side effects, and dosing time helped to moderate patients' misconceptions and concerns, which are crucial risk factors for nonadherence (Arkan et al., 2022). The teach-back method, under which patients repeat instructions to them in their own words verbally, was very effective for stroke patients with cognitive impairments. Informational personalization of the patient's level of functioning is one of the strongest points of nurse-initiated interventions. By using everyday language, visual aids, and interactive teaching modalities, nurses ensure maximum knowledge retention in patients with cognitive impairments. Second, follow-up frequently helps strengthen learning and enforces accountability. Combined, these steps turn information into action plans that patients can uphold outside the clinical setting.

    Technology-enabled nurse interventions were also seen as promising. Zhang et al. (2024) compared several randomized controlled trials of eHealth programs delivered by nurses and registered a 50% reduction in missed doses using digital reminders and virtual follow-up. These programs increased adherence and functional recovery by engaging the patients in the rehabilitation program. Kumar et al. (2024) also demonstrated that structured nurse involvement in stroke care teams led to decreased treatment intervals and higher medication adherence rates, notably risky medication like anticoagulants. Their meta-analysis reported that nurse-led protocols reduced door-to-needle times by nearly 20 minutes and enhanced functional outcomes at three months in the same breath. Online platforms enable nurses to monitor compliance in real-time and initiate timely interventions as required. These systems also engage patients with reminders and progress feedback, enhancing a more incredible feeling of control. Of equal importance is the reality that virtual programs led by nurses remove the burden of transport and scheduling inconvenience, particularly for stroke survivors who have limited mobility. This accessibility ensures that more patients receive organized, ongoing care.

    The interventions work because nurses' unique role is to provide uninterrupted, patient-centered care. By combining education with evidence-based support interventions such as simplified dosing regimens, reminding, and motivational interviewing, the practical and psychological barriers to adherence can be overcome by nurses (Berardinelli et al., 2024). This integrated approach is particularly vital for stroke patients who have complex medication schedules to add to their cognitive and physical impairment. The literature consistently supports nurse-implemented interventions to reduce preventable complications and improve long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.

    **Conclusion**

    Medication nonadherence among stroke patients is a highly complex issue of life-and-death consequences. Nurses with evidence-based practice measures like customized education are the best professionals to address this issue. In the literature review, the efficacy of nurse-implemented interventions for improving adherence, reducing the number of stroke recurrences, and enhancing the quality of life in patients is promoted. With the application of these interventions, nurses can implement research into practice and assist patients in receiving the support they need to manage their medications effectively.

    References

    Arkan, G., Ordin, Y. S., Ozturk, V., & Ala, R. T. (2022). Investigation of medication adherence and factors affecting it in patients with stroke.
    _Journal of Neuroscience Nursing_,
    _54_(1), 35-41.
    [https://journals.lww.com/jnnonline/fulltext/2022/02000/investigation_of_medication_adherence_and_factors.8.aspx](https://journals.lww.com/jnnonline/fulltext/2022/02000/investigation_of_medication_adherence_and_factors.8.aspx)

    Berardinelli, D., Conti, A., Hasnaoui, A., Casabona, E., Martin, B., Campagna, S., & Dimonte, V. (2024, November). Nurse-Led Interventions for Improving Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. In
    _Healthcare_ (Vol. 12, No. 23, p. 2337). MDPI.
    [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641167/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641167/)

    Kumar, A., Kumar, M., Verma, P., Pal, R., Nagi, M., Mahesh, K. V., … & Khurana, D. (2024). Effects of stroke nurse-led acute stroke management on treatment time benchmarks, intravenous thrombolysis rates, and patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases_, 108216.
    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006591](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724006591)

    Zhang, W., Mei, Z., Feng, Z., & Li, B. (2024). Effects of a nurse-led health program on functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with stroke: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    _Frontiers in Public Health_,
    _12_, 1395270.
    [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270/full](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270/full)

    **Module51.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module51-docx-10264929)

  • [Solved] NUR 507 Lecture Discussion 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    A 2-month-old is identified during newborn screening with sickle cell anemia. – How would you manage this patient at 2 months, 2 years, 6 years, and at 13 years old? – What are the issues for each stage in development? – Where would you refer this child? – How would you coordinate the care of this c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    A 2-month-old is identified during newborn screening with sickle cell anemia.

    – How would you manage this patient at 2 months, 2 years, 6 years, and at 13 years old?
    – What are the issues for each stage in development?
    – Where would you refer this child?
    – How would you coordinate the care of this child?

    . **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] NUR 507 Clinical Discussion 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe your clinical experience for this week. – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. – Mention the …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    – Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
    – Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
    – Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
    – What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
    – Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] NSG7020 – Week 5 project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Week 5 Project ## **Instructions** **Nurses are typically less familiar with qualitative studies than quantitative. When doing a thorough literature review to find external evidence, it is important that you consider all points of view. This assignment will provide you with an opportunity to read an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Week 5 Project

    ## **Instructions**

    **Nurses are typically less familiar with qualitative studies than quantitative. When doing a thorough literature review to find external evidence, it is important that you consider all points of view. This assignment will provide you with an opportunity to read and appraise a qualitative study and objectively determine its worth to inform your PICOT question. (** My week two PICOT question: In adults with obesity (P), how does participation in a structured weight management program (I), compared to self-directed weight loss efforts (C), affect long-term weight maintenance (O) over a 12-month period (T)?

    ### **Tasks:**

    **In** **Submissions Area, you appraised quantitative evidence from a reference list that was provided. You then set up an Evaluation Table for your individual PICOT question. In this week, you will add to that table by adding the critical appraisal of a qualitative study. Use the reference list provided in** **Submissions Area and critically appraise the qualitative study.**

    **Compile the following:**

    – **A copy of the RCA form for the qualitative study from the** [**Reference List**](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/122366-17148389/media/week4/SU_NSG7020_W4A2_ReferenceList_Scenario2.pdf) **using the appropriate RCA checklists. (Attached)**
    – **A completed Evaluation Table that includes the quantitative and qualitative studies**

    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_W4A2_ReferenceList_Scenario2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-w4a2-referencelist-scenario2-pdf "SU_NSG7020_W4A2_ReferenceList_Scenario2.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_RCA_QualitativeEvidence.doc](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-rca-qualitativeevidence-doc "SU_NSG7020_RCA_QualitativeEvidence.doc")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Health Promotion Assignement 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Guidefordiabetrs.docx – ## GuideforaSelectedChronicConditionTemplat_JanetHuxley.docx **## Guidefordiabetrs.docx** The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-bas…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Guidefordiabetrs.docx

    – ## GuideforaSelectedChronicConditionTemplat_JanetHuxley.docx

    **## Guidefordiabetrs.docx**

    The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems for

    **Diabetes Mellitus**

    **Your study guide must include:**

    · Definition, etiology

    · Occurrence/epidemiology

    · Clinical presentation

    · Diagnostic testing

    · Differential diagnosis

    · Non-pharmacological and pharmacological management and follow up

    Include resources and guidelines used for the elaboration of the study guide. Use the template.

    APA style 7th edition

    Attached is the template

    **## GuideforaSelectedChronicConditionTemplat_JanetHuxley.docx**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Intussusception |
    | What is it? | Intussusception occurs when a portion of the intestine folds like a telescope, with one segment slipping inside another segment. It can occur anywhere in the intestines. This causes an obstruction, preventing the passage of food that is being digested through the intestine. |
    | Etiology | The cause of intussusception is not known. Though rare, an increased incidence of developing intussusception may be seen in children:<br>· Who have abdominal or intestinal tumors or masses<br>· Who have appendicitis |
    | Occurrence/Epidemiology | Children less than 3 years old, can also occur in older children, teenagers, and adults.<br>· Intussusception occurs more often in boys than girls. |
    | Clinical Presentation <br>_(subjective and physical examination)_ | Subjective: Pain, Sudden loud crying, Straining, Draw knees up, Irritable. | Objective: red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. |
    | Diagnostic Testing | X-Ray: may demonstrate an elongated soft tissue mass with a bowel obstruction proximal to it. | Ultrasound: ‘Target Sign’<br>also known as the doughnut sign or bull's eye sign. appearance is generated by concentric alternating echogenic and hypoechogenic bands. | Upper & Lower GI Series (Barium Swallow & Enema): giving the "coiled spring” appearance |
    | 3 Differential Diagnosis <br>_(include difference between each differential diagnosis & the main diagnosis)_ | Intussusception:<br>Pain, sudden crying, red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. | Gastroenteritis: vomiting that are typically nonbilious, often with anorexia, fever, lethargy, and diarrhea.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Gastric Volvulus: Epigastric pain tenderness and distention, vomiting, bloody diarrhea<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Appendicitis: abdominal pain that has migrated from a periumbilical position to the right lower quadrant.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool or masses.** |
    | Non-Pharmacologic Management | There are currently no nonpharmacological treatments. |
    | Pharmacologic Management | May fix itself while being diagnosed with barium enema. Air enema (aids in moving intestines back). <br>Antibiotics if infection present<br>Surgery: push the telescoped intestine back out. Rare cases a resection of intestines may happen, and stoma created. |
    | Follow Up | With toleration of diet, patients treated with nonoperative reduction are usually discharged 12-18 hours after the therapeutic enema. After operative reduction, postoperative progress dictates the length of stay. |
    | References |
    | Blanco, F. C., Chahine, A. A., King, L., & Wilkes, G. (2017, July 3). Intussusception: Practice Essentials, Background, Etiology and Pathophysiology. Retrieved from <br>[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview#a1](http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview)<br>Crawford, E. (2015). NP-Family Specialty Review and Study Guide: A Series from StatPearls. Retrieved from <br>[https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s](https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s)<br>Epocrates. (2017). Intussusception Differential Diagnosis – Epocrates Online. Retrieved from <br>[https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis](https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis)<br>Shah, V., & Amini, B. (2017). Intussusception | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. Retrieved from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/intussusception |

    **## GuideforaSelectedChronicConditionTemplat_JanetHuxley.docx**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Intussusception |
    | What is it? | Intussusception occurs when a portion of the intestine folds like a telescope, with one segment slipping inside another segment. It can occur anywhere in the intestines. This causes an obstruction, preventing the passage of food that is being digested through the intestine. |
    | Etiology | The cause of intussusception is not known. Though rare, an increased incidence of developing intussusception may be seen in children:<br>· Who have abdominal or intestinal tumors or masses<br>· Who have appendicitis |
    | Occurrence/Epidemiology | Children less than 3 years old, can also occur in older children, teenagers, and adults.<br>· Intussusception occurs more often in boys than girls. |
    | Clinical Presentation <br>_(subjective and physical examination)_ | Subjective: Pain, Sudden loud crying, Straining, Draw knees up, Irritable. | Objective: red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. |
    | Diagnostic Testing | X-Ray: may demonstrate an elongated soft tissue mass with a bowel obstruction proximal to it. | Ultrasound: ‘Target Sign’<br>also known as the doughnut sign or bull's eye sign. appearance is generated by concentric alternating echogenic and hypoechogenic bands. | Upper & Lower GI Series (Barium Swallow & Enema): giving the "coiled spring” appearance |
    | 3 Differential Diagnosis <br>_(include difference between each differential diagnosis & the main diagnosis)_ | Intussusception:<br>Pain, sudden crying, red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. | Gastroenteritis: vomiting that are typically nonbilious, often with anorexia, fever, lethargy, and diarrhea.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Gastric Volvulus: Epigastric pain tenderness and distention, vomiting, bloody diarrhea<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Appendicitis: abdominal pain that has migrated from a periumbilical position to the right lower quadrant.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool or masses.** |
    | Non-Pharmacologic Management | There are currently no nonpharmacological treatments. |
    | Pharmacologic Management | May fix itself while being diagnosed with barium enema. Air enema (aids in moving intestines back). <br>Antibiotics if infection present<br>Surgery: push the telescoped intestine back out. Rare cases a resection of intestines may happen, and stoma created. |
    | Follow Up | With toleration of diet, patients treated with nonoperative reduction are usually discharged 12-18 hours after the therapeutic enema. After operative reduction, postoperative progress dictates the length of stay. |
    | References |
    | Blanco, F. C., Chahine, A. A., King, L., & Wilkes, G. (2017, July 3). Intussusception: Practice Essentials, Background, Etiology and Pathophysiology. Retrieved from <br>[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview#a1](http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview)<br>Crawford, E. (2015). NP-Family Specialty Review and Study Guide: A Series from StatPearls. Retrieved from <br>[https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s](https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s)<br>Epocrates. (2017). Intussusception Differential Diagnosis – Epocrates Online. Retrieved from <br>[https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis](https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis)<br>Shah, V., & Amini, B. (2017). Intussusception | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. Retrieved from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/intussusception |

    **## Guidefordiabetrs.docx**

    The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems for

    **Diabetes Mellitus**

    **Your study guide must include:**

    · Definition, etiology

    · Occurrence/epidemiology

    · Clinical presentation

    · Diagnostic testing

    · Differential diagnosis

    · Non-pharmacological and pharmacological management and follow up

    Include resources and guidelines used for the elaboration of the study guide. Use the template.

    APA style 7th edition

    Attached is the template

    **## GuideforaSelectedChronicConditionTemplat_JanetHuxley.docx**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Intussusception |
    | What is it? | Intussusception occurs when a portion of the intestine folds like a telescope, with one segment slipping inside another segment. It can occur anywhere in the intestines. This causes an obstruction, preventing the passage of food that is being digested through the intestine. |
    | Etiology | The cause of intussusception is not known. Though rare, an increased incidence of developing intussusception may be seen in children:<br>· Who have abdominal or intestinal tumors or masses<br>· Who have appendicitis |
    | Occurrence/Epidemiology | Children less than 3 years old, can also occur in older children, teenagers, and adults.<br>· Intussusception occurs more often in boys than girls. |
    | Clinical Presentation <br>_(subjective and physical examination)_ | Subjective: Pain, Sudden loud crying, Straining, Draw knees up, Irritable. | Objective: red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. |
    | Diagnostic Testing | X-Ray: may demonstrate an elongated soft tissue mass with a bowel obstruction proximal to it. | Ultrasound: ‘Target Sign’<br>also known as the doughnut sign or bull's eye sign. appearance is generated by concentric alternating echogenic and hypoechogenic bands. | Upper & Lower GI Series (Barium Swallow & Enema): giving the "coiled spring” appearance |
    | 3 Differential Diagnosis <br>_(include difference between each differential diagnosis & the main diagnosis)_ | Intussusception:<br>Pain, sudden crying, red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. | Gastroenteritis: vomiting that are typically nonbilious, often with anorexia, fever, lethargy, and diarrhea.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Gastric Volvulus: Epigastric pain tenderness and distention, vomiting, bloody diarrhea<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Appendicitis: abdominal pain that has migrated from a periumbilical position to the right lower quadrant.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool or masses.** |
    | Non-Pharmacologic Management | There are currently no nonpharmacological treatments. |
    | Pharmacologic Management | May fix itself while being diagnosed with barium enema. Air enema (aids in moving intestines back). <br>Antibiotics if infection present<br>Surgery: push the telescoped intestine back out. Rare cases a resection of intestines may happen, and stoma created. |
    | Follow Up | With toleration of diet, patients treated with nonoperative reduction are usually discharged 12-18 hours after the therapeutic enema. After operative reduction, postoperative progress dictates the length of stay. |
    | References |
    | Blanco, F. C., Chahine, A. A., King, L., & Wilkes, G. (2017, July 3). Intussusception: Practice Essentials, Background, Etiology and Pathophysiology. Retrieved from <br>[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview#a1](http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview)<br>Crawford, E. (2015). NP-Family Specialty Review and Study Guide: A Series from StatPearls. Retrieved from <br>[https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s](https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s)<br>Epocrates. (2017). Intussusception Differential Diagnosis – Epocrates Online. Retrieved from <br>[https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis](https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis)<br>Shah, V., & Amini, B. (2017). Intussusception | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. Retrieved from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/intussusception |

    **## Guidefordiabetrs.docx**

    The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems for

    **Diabetes Mellitus**

    **Your study guide must include:**

    · Definition, etiology

    · Occurrence/epidemiology

    · Clinical presentation

    · Diagnostic testing

    · Differential diagnosis

    · Non-pharmacological and pharmacological management and follow up

    Include resources and guidelines used for the elaboration of the study guide. Use the template.

    APA style 7th edition

    Attached is the template

    **## GuideforaSelectedChronicConditionTemplat_JanetHuxley.docx**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Intussusception |
    | What is it? | Intussusception occurs when a portion of the intestine folds like a telescope, with one segment slipping inside another segment. It can occur anywhere in the intestines. This causes an obstruction, preventing the passage of food that is being digested through the intestine. |
    | Etiology | The cause of intussusception is not known. Though rare, an increased incidence of developing intussusception may be seen in children:<br>· Who have abdominal or intestinal tumors or masses<br>· Who have appendicitis |
    | Occurrence/Epidemiology | Children less than 3 years old, can also occur in older children, teenagers, and adults.<br>· Intussusception occurs more often in boys than girls. |
    | Clinical Presentation <br>_(subjective and physical examination)_ | Subjective: Pain, Sudden loud crying, Straining, Draw knees up, Irritable. | Objective: red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. |
    | Diagnostic Testing | X-Ray: may demonstrate an elongated soft tissue mass with a bowel obstruction proximal to it. | Ultrasound: ‘Target Sign’<br>also known as the doughnut sign or bull's eye sign. appearance is generated by concentric alternating echogenic and hypoechogenic bands. | Upper & Lower GI Series (Barium Swallow & Enema): giving the "coiled spring” appearance |
    | 3 Differential Diagnosis <br>_(include difference between each differential diagnosis & the main diagnosis)_ | Intussusception:<br>Pain, sudden crying, red mucus or jelly like stool, fever, lethargic, vomiting bile, diarrhea, sweating, dehydration, abdominal distention or lump. | Gastroenteritis: vomiting that are typically nonbilious, often with anorexia, fever, lethargy, and diarrhea.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Gastric Volvulus: Epigastric pain tenderness and distention, vomiting, bloody diarrhea<br> <br>**No jelly like stool** | Appendicitis: abdominal pain that has migrated from a periumbilical position to the right lower quadrant.<br> <br>**No jelly like stool or masses.** |
    | Non-Pharmacologic Management | There are currently no nonpharmacological treatments. |
    | Pharmacologic Management | May fix itself while being diagnosed with barium enema. Air enema (aids in moving intestines back). <br>Antibiotics if infection present<br>Surgery: push the telescoped intestine back out. Rare cases a resection of intestines may happen, and stoma created. |
    | Follow Up | With toleration of diet, patients treated with nonoperative reduction are usually discharged 12-18 hours after the therapeutic enema. After operative reduction, postoperative progress dictates the length of stay. |
    | References |
    | Blanco, F. C., Chahine, A. A., King, L., & Wilkes, G. (2017, July 3). Intussusception: Practice Essentials, Background, Etiology and Pathophysiology. Retrieved from <br>[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview#a1](http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930708-overview)<br>Crawford, E. (2015). NP-Family Specialty Review and Study Guide: A Series from StatPearls. Retrieved from <br>[https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s](https://books.google.com/books?id=86ybCgAAQBAJ&dq=intussusception+np+questions&source=gbs_navlinks_s)<br>Epocrates. (2017). Intussusception Differential Diagnosis – Epocrates Online. Retrieved from <br>[https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis](https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/67935/Intussusception/Differential-Diagnosis)<br>Shah, V., & Amini, B. (2017). Intussusception | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. Retrieved from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/intussusception |

  • [Solved] Nursing organization conflict assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing organization conflict assignment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing assignment 2 4000

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## nurs-fpx4000-assessment-02-supplement-applying-research-skills-A.pdf – ## cf_example_applying_library_research_skills1.pdf – ## Assignment2instructions.docx **## nurs-fpx4000-assessment-02-supplement-applying-research-skills-A.pdf** Assessment 02 – Applying Rese…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## nurs-fpx4000-assessment-02-supplement-applying-research-skills-A.pdf

    – ## cf_example_applying_library_research_skills1.pdf

    – ## Assignment2instructions.docx

    **## nurs-fpx4000-assessment-02-supplement-applying-research-skills-A.pdf**

    Assessment 02 – Applying Research Skills

    For this assessment, you will research best practices related to a current health care
    problem. Your selected problem or issue may be utilized again in a future assessment.
    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the
    following health care problems or issues:

    • Mental Health Stigma
    o Description: Many individuals with mental health conditions face stigma and

    discrimination, which can prevent them from seeking help and receiving
    appropriate care. This stigma can be perpetuated by societal attitudes, lack of
    awareness, and misinformation about mental health.

    o Interventions: Public awareness campaigns, mental health education in schools,
    workplace mental health programs, peer support groups, policy changes to
    protect individuals with mental health conditions, and training for healthcare
    providers on mental health issues.

    o Keywords: Mental health awareness, stigma reduction, mental health education,
    peer support, mental health policy, workplace mental health, mental health
    training, mental health services, mental health advocacy.

    • Chronic Disease Management
    o Description: Managing chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and

    heart disease can be challenging due to the need for ongoing medical care,
    lifestyle changes, and medication adherence. Poor management of chronic
    diseases can lead to complications and reduced quality of life.

    o Interventions: Patient education programs, chronic disease self-management
    workshops, telehealth for regular monitoring, integrated care models, community
    health programs, mobile health applications, and support for lifestyle changes
    such as diet and exercise.

    o Keywords: Chronic disease management, patient education, self-management,
    telehealth, integrated care, community health, mobile health, lifestyle changes,
    chronic disease prevention, chronic disease support.

    After you have selected one of the problems/issues from the list above, return to the detailed
    instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

    1

    **## cf_example_applying_library_research_skills1.pdf**

    1

    Applying Library Research Skills

    Your Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX4000: Developing a Nursing Perspective

    Instructor Name

    Month, Year

    2

    Healthcare Disparities

    Healthcare disparities among individuals from low socio-economic status (SES) have been a

    persistent issue, requiring attention and intervention from healthcare professionals, especially nurses.

    This paper aims to provide an overview of the topic's professional relevance to nursing. The process of

    article selection through library databases assessing the credibility of selected articles and an annotated

    bibliography of three peer-reviewed journal articles, highlighting key findings related to healthcare

    disparities for those with low SES is the focus of this paper. The paper concludes with reflections on the

    learnings derived from developing an annotated bibliography on this critical healthcare issue.

    Professional Relevance

    Nurses play a crucial role in addressing healthcare disparities, particularly for individuals from low

    SES. The social determinants of health, such as income, education, and living conditions, significantly impact

    health outcomes. Nurses, being at the forefront of patient care, must be equipped with the knowledge

    and skills to recognize, address, and advocate for vulnerable populations. Understanding healthcare

    disparities allows nurses to provide culturally competent care, contribute to policy changes, and engage

    in community-based interventions to improve health equity.

    Article Selection Process

    To compile relevant literature on healthcare disparities for individuals with low SES, a systematic

    approach to article selection is essential. Through the Capella Library, I was able to utilize various

    databases, such as PubMed and CINAHL. I limited my search by using appropriate key terms. Key terms

    included 'healthcare disparities,' 'low socio-economic status,' 'access to healthcare,' and 'nursing

    interventions.' I also used Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to enhance the search results. Filtering

    results to peer-reviewed articles ensured the reliability and academic rigor of the selected literature. I

    also limited the search to articles published within the past three years to ensure they were current.

    3

    Assessing Credibility

    Evaluating the credibility of selected articles is important. Criteria for credibility assessment

    include examining the author's qualifications, the source's reputation, and the presence of a peer-review

    process. Reviewing the methodology, data sources, and potential biases within the articles is crucial. The

    use of reputable journals, academic institutions, and established researchers enhances the credibility of the

    selected articles, ensuring the information is evidence-based and reliable.

    Annotated Bibliography

    Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health

    outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12487

    This longitudinal study examines the relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and

    limited public transportation. Limited financial resources often hinder access to private

    transportation, making it difficult for vulnerable populations to reach healthcare facilities promptly.

    Reliable and affordable public transportation can help ensure individuals can attend medical

    appointments, access preventive care, and adhere to treatment plans.

    Lack of transportation can lead to delayed or missed healthcare appointments, exacerbating

    health issues and contributes to disparities in health outcomes (Garcia et al., 2023). Public

    transportation not only facilitates timely access to healthcare services but also promotes

    preventive care, reducing the burden on emergency services. Reliable public transportation

    enhances overall community health by connecting individuals to resources such as pharmacies,

    grocery stores, and community centers.

    4

    Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

    review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2228.235.84

    Conducting a systematic review, this article investigates the challenges low SES individuals face in

    accessing primary care services. The findings underscore the need for policy changes to enhance

    healthcare access. Nurses can use this information to advocate for structural changes and

    contribute to the development of inclusive healthcare systems. One of the main interventions

    discussed in this article is the use of telemedicine to help expand healthcare services,

    particularly in remote areas, allowing individuals to be able to meet their providers virtually and

    not be hindered by the lack of transportation available to them (Jones et al., 2022). The article

    discusses how with telemedicine there are additional needs such as technology and internet

    connectivity which will need to be addressed as many with low SES are not able to afford the

    bandwidth needed for visual telemedicine meetings with their provider.

    Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal

    of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11232.dd0

    This article explores various nursing interventions aimed at addressing healthcare disparities in

    low SES populations. The study emphasizes the importance of culturally competent care and

    community engagement. The authors highlight successful strategies implemented by nurses in

    diverse settings, offering insights into best practices for promoting health equity. The

    interventions apply to areas such as transportation, assistance with prescriptions, and tele-

    health options (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The sample was a small sample in a rural area of West

    Virgina, but the interventions should be applicable to more areas including urban areas.

    The primary intervention this article discusses in the need for financial assistance programs

    and sliding scale fees to help make healthcare more affordable. The article also discusses the

    5

    need for financial assistance in areas such as affordable housing, education, and job assistance

    programs to facilitate individuals to be able to better care for themselves and their families.

    Reflections on Developing the Annotated Bibliography

    Developing the annotated bibliography provided valuable insights into the multifaceted nature

    of healthcare disparities for individuals with low SES. It highlighted the importance of interdisciplinary

    research and collaboration in addressing these disparities. I learned more about how healthcare

    disparities for individuals from low SES are a critical concern requiring the attention and action of

    healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. The process of creating an annotated bibliography and

    using a systematic article selection process along with assessing the credibility of selected literature, will

    assist me not only with this topic, but as I continue to research new topics during my education and

    professional careers.

    6

    References

    Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on

    health outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12487

    Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

    Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2228.235.84

    Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal of

    Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11232.dd0

    **## Assignment2instructions.docx**

    Assignment 2

    Create a written assessment, including an annotated bibliography section, to document your research on a healthcare problem or an issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    Expand All

    ### **Introduction**

    In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing healthcare environment. Being adept at research helps you find the information you need. This assessment gives you practice with that skill by having you research a healthcare problem or issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    ### **Overview**

    You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

    **Reminder:** You will use your selected problem or issue again in upcoming assessments. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the
    _annotation_. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

    ### **Prepare**

    Conduct research in the Capella library to find a total of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles in relation to a selected healthcare problem or issue presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource.
    **You must select your healthcare-related issue or problem from the topic areas** presented in this resource.

    **Important Note:** Conduct a library search as needed. Review the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Research Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) for assistance. Be sure to review journal articles published within the past three to five years.

    ### **Write Your Paper**

    Write a 3–5 page paper in which you include the following:

    #### **Topic Identification**

    Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource. Write a brief overview of the healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

    · Summarize the healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe your interest in the problem or issue.

    · Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

    #### **Discussion of Research**

    Discuss your research and selection process for each of the three journal articles you have chosen to include in your annotated bibliography.

    · Describe your process of applying library research skills to identify the journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching.

    · Identify the keywords you used to select the articles.

    · Describe the criteria you used to select the resources, including the names of the databases you used.

    · What was the process like to locate relevant articles?

    · Assess the credibility of the information sources.

    · Determine whether each resource is from an academic, peer-reviewed journal.

    · Determine whether the publication is current (published within the last 3–5 years).

    · Determine whether information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

    · Assess the relevance of the information sources.

    · Explain how the healthcare problem or issue is addressed in each source.

    · Discuss what kind of contribution each resource provides.

    #### **Annotated Bibliography**

    Summarize each of the three current academic, peer-reviewed journal articles you chose, using the annotated bibliography organizational format. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:

    · List each full reference in APA format, followed immediately by its annotation.

    · Present your three current, annotated references in alphabetical order, according to the reference citation.

    · Double-space each reference and format it with a hanging indent.

    · Provide the full APA reference citation, including the author, date, title, publisher or publication, and any additional information required by APA style.

    · Write the annotation (summary) for each citation in paragraph form, using approximately 150 words (or 1–3 paragraphs) for each citation. Make sure to cite the article in your summary. Include the following components for each annotation:

    · Identify the purpose of the article.

    · Summarize the article.

    · Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

    #### **Summary**

    In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from the process of developing the annotated bibliography.

    ### **Academic Requirements**

    Your academic writing is expected to conform to the following requirements:

    ·
    **Writing:** Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    ·
    **Sources:** Integrate into text appropriate use of current scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. Use the
    [Evidence and APA](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540) guidelines provided. Cite the reference in its summary.

    ·
    **Formatting:** Include a title page and reference page, Times New Roman, 12 point.

    ·
    **Length:** Complete no more than 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.

    ·
    **References:** Although you are citing your three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles within the Annotated Bibliography section of this paper, be sure to also list your citations on a reference page at the end of your paper, along with any other resources you may have included.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 2 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662279/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    Submit your paper as an attached Microsoft Word document.

    ### **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of healthcare.

    · Summarize a healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe the process for selecting academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a healthcare problem or issue being researched.

    · Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography as it relates to the topic and the ability to use the annotated bibliography process for future assessments.

    · Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of healthcare.

    · Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.

    · Summarize academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.

    · Competency 5: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references

    **## Assignment2instructions.docx**

    Assignment 2

    Create a written assessment, including an annotated bibliography section, to document your research on a healthcare problem or an issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    Expand All

    ### **Introduction**

    In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing healthcare environment. Being adept at research helps you find the information you need. This assessment gives you practice with that skill by having you research a healthcare problem or issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    ### **Overview**

    You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

    **Reminder:** You will use your selected problem or issue again in upcoming assessments. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the
    _annotation_. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

    ### **Prepare**

    Conduct research in the Capella library to find a total of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles in relation to a selected healthcare problem or issue presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource.
    **You must select your healthcare-related issue or problem from the topic areas** presented in this resource.

    **Important Note:** Conduct a library search as needed. Review the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Research Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) for assistance. Be sure to review journal articles published within the past three to five years.

    ### **Write Your Paper**

    Write a 3–5 page paper in which you include the following:

    #### **Topic Identification**

    Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource. Write a brief overview of the healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

    · Summarize the healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe your interest in the problem or issue.

    · Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

    #### **Discussion of Research**

    Discuss your research and selection process for each of the three journal articles you have chosen to include in your annotated bibliography.

    · Describe your process of applying library research skills to identify the journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching.

    · Identify the keywords you used to select the articles.

    · Describe the criteria you used to select the resources, including the names of the databases you used.

    · What was the process like to locate relevant articles?

    · Assess the credibility of the information sources.

    · Determine whether each resource is from an academic, peer-reviewed journal.

    · Determine whether the publication is current (published within the last 3–5 years).

    · Determine whether information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

    · Assess the relevance of the information sources.

    · Explain how the healthcare problem or issue is addressed in each source.

    · Discuss what kind of contribution each resource provides.

    #### **Annotated Bibliography**

    Summarize each of the three current academic, peer-reviewed journal articles you chose, using the annotated bibliography organizational format. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:

    · List each full reference in APA format, followed immediately by its annotation.

    · Present your three current, annotated references in alphabetical order, according to the reference citation.

    · Double-space each reference and format it with a hanging indent.

    · Provide the full APA reference citation, including the author, date, title, publisher or publication, and any additional information required by APA style.

    · Write the annotation (summary) for each citation in paragraph form, using approximately 150 words (or 1–3 paragraphs) for each citation. Make sure to cite the article in your summary. Include the following components for each annotation:

    · Identify the purpose of the article.

    · Summarize the article.

    · Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

    #### **Summary**

    In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from the process of developing the annotated bibliography.

    ### **Academic Requirements**

    Your academic writing is expected to conform to the following requirements:

    ·
    **Writing:** Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    ·
    **Sources:** Integrate into text appropriate use of current scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. Use the
    [Evidence and APA](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540) guidelines provided. Cite the reference in its summary.

    ·
    **Formatting:** Include a title page and reference page, Times New Roman, 12 point.

    ·
    **Length:** Complete no more than 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.

    ·
    **References:** Although you are citing your three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles within the Annotated Bibliography section of this paper, be sure to also list your citations on a reference page at the end of your paper, along with any other resources you may have included.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 2 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662279/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    Submit your paper as an attached Microsoft Word document.

    ### **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of healthcare.

    · Summarize a healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe the process for selecting academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a healthcare problem or issue being researched.

    · Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography as it relates to the topic and the ability to use the annotated bibliography process for future assessments.

    · Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of healthcare.

    · Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.

    · Summarize academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.

    · Competency 5: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references

    **## nurs-fpx4000-assessment-02-supplement-applying-research-skills-A.pdf**

    Assessment 02 – Applying Research Skills

    For this assessment, you will research best practices related to a current health care
    problem. Your selected problem or issue may be utilized again in a future assessment.
    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the
    following health care problems or issues:

    • Mental Health Stigma
    o Description: Many individuals with mental health conditions face stigma and

    discrimination, which can prevent them from seeking help and receiving
    appropriate care. This stigma can be perpetuated by societal attitudes, lack of
    awareness, and misinformation about mental health.

    o Interventions: Public awareness campaigns, mental health education in schools,
    workplace mental health programs, peer support groups, policy changes to
    protect individuals with mental health conditions, and training for healthcare
    providers on mental health issues.

    o Keywords: Mental health awareness, stigma reduction, mental health education,
    peer support, mental health policy, workplace mental health, mental health
    training, mental health services, mental health advocacy.

    • Chronic Disease Management
    o Description: Managing chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and

    heart disease can be challenging due to the need for ongoing medical care,
    lifestyle changes, and medication adherence. Poor management of chronic
    diseases can lead to complications and reduced quality of life.

    o Interventions: Patient education programs, chronic disease self-management
    workshops, telehealth for regular monitoring, integrated care models, community
    health programs, mobile health applications, and support for lifestyle changes
    such as diet and exercise.

    o Keywords: Chronic disease management, patient education, self-management,
    telehealth, integrated care, community health, mobile health, lifestyle changes,
    chronic disease prevention, chronic disease support.

    After you have selected one of the problems/issues from the list above, return to the detailed
    instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

    1

    **## cf_example_applying_library_research_skills1.pdf**

    1

    Applying Library Research Skills

    Your Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX4000: Developing a Nursing Perspective

    Instructor Name

    Month, Year

    2

    Healthcare Disparities

    Healthcare disparities among individuals from low socio-economic status (SES) have been a

    persistent issue, requiring attention and intervention from healthcare professionals, especially nurses.

    This paper aims to provide an overview of the topic's professional relevance to nursing. The process of

    article selection through library databases assessing the credibility of selected articles and an annotated

    bibliography of three peer-reviewed journal articles, highlighting key findings related to healthcare

    disparities for those with low SES is the focus of this paper. The paper concludes with reflections on the

    learnings derived from developing an annotated bibliography on this critical healthcare issue.

    Professional Relevance

    Nurses play a crucial role in addressing healthcare disparities, particularly for individuals from low

    SES. The social determinants of health, such as income, education, and living conditions, significantly impact

    health outcomes. Nurses, being at the forefront of patient care, must be equipped with the knowledge

    and skills to recognize, address, and advocate for vulnerable populations. Understanding healthcare

    disparities allows nurses to provide culturally competent care, contribute to policy changes, and engage

    in community-based interventions to improve health equity.

    Article Selection Process

    To compile relevant literature on healthcare disparities for individuals with low SES, a systematic

    approach to article selection is essential. Through the Capella Library, I was able to utilize various

    databases, such as PubMed and CINAHL. I limited my search by using appropriate key terms. Key terms

    included 'healthcare disparities,' 'low socio-economic status,' 'access to healthcare,' and 'nursing

    interventions.' I also used Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to enhance the search results. Filtering

    results to peer-reviewed articles ensured the reliability and academic rigor of the selected literature. I

    also limited the search to articles published within the past three years to ensure they were current.

    3

    Assessing Credibility

    Evaluating the credibility of selected articles is important. Criteria for credibility assessment

    include examining the author's qualifications, the source's reputation, and the presence of a peer-review

    process. Reviewing the methodology, data sources, and potential biases within the articles is crucial. The

    use of reputable journals, academic institutions, and established researchers enhances the credibility of the

    selected articles, ensuring the information is evidence-based and reliable.

    Annotated Bibliography

    Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health

    outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12487

    This longitudinal study examines the relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and

    limited public transportation. Limited financial resources often hinder access to private

    transportation, making it difficult for vulnerable populations to reach healthcare facilities promptly.

    Reliable and affordable public transportation can help ensure individuals can attend medical

    appointments, access preventive care, and adhere to treatment plans.

    Lack of transportation can lead to delayed or missed healthcare appointments, exacerbating

    health issues and contributes to disparities in health outcomes (Garcia et al., 2023). Public

    transportation not only facilitates timely access to healthcare services but also promotes

    preventive care, reducing the burden on emergency services. Reliable public transportation

    enhances overall community health by connecting individuals to resources such as pharmacies,

    grocery stores, and community centers.

    4

    Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

    review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2228.235.84

    Conducting a systematic review, this article investigates the challenges low SES individuals face in

    accessing primary care services. The findings underscore the need for policy changes to enhance

    healthcare access. Nurses can use this information to advocate for structural changes and

    contribute to the development of inclusive healthcare systems. One of the main interventions

    discussed in this article is the use of telemedicine to help expand healthcare services,

    particularly in remote areas, allowing individuals to be able to meet their providers virtually and

    not be hindered by the lack of transportation available to them (Jones et al., 2022). The article

    discusses how with telemedicine there are additional needs such as technology and internet

    connectivity which will need to be addressed as many with low SES are not able to afford the

    bandwidth needed for visual telemedicine meetings with their provider.

    Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal

    of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11232.dd0

    This article explores various nursing interventions aimed at addressing healthcare disparities in

    low SES populations. The study emphasizes the importance of culturally competent care and

    community engagement. The authors highlight successful strategies implemented by nurses in

    diverse settings, offering insights into best practices for promoting health equity. The

    interventions apply to areas such as transportation, assistance with prescriptions, and tele-

    health options (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The sample was a small sample in a rural area of West

    Virgina, but the interventions should be applicable to more areas including urban areas.

    The primary intervention this article discusses in the need for financial assistance programs

    and sliding scale fees to help make healthcare more affordable. The article also discusses the

    5

    need for financial assistance in areas such as affordable housing, education, and job assistance

    programs to facilitate individuals to be able to better care for themselves and their families.

    Reflections on Developing the Annotated Bibliography

    Developing the annotated bibliography provided valuable insights into the multifaceted nature

    of healthcare disparities for individuals with low SES. It highlighted the importance of interdisciplinary

    research and collaboration in addressing these disparities. I learned more about how healthcare

    disparities for individuals from low SES are a critical concern requiring the attention and action of

    healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. The process of creating an annotated bibliography and

    using a systematic article selection process along with assessing the credibility of selected literature, will

    assist me not only with this topic, but as I continue to research new topics during my education and

    professional careers.

    6

    References

    Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on

    health outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12487

    Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

    Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2228.235.84

    Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal of

    Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11232.dd0

    **## Assignment2instructions.docx**

    Assignment 2

    Create a written assessment, including an annotated bibliography section, to document your research on a healthcare problem or an issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    Expand All

    ### **Introduction**

    In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing healthcare environment. Being adept at research helps you find the information you need. This assessment gives you practice with that skill by having you research a healthcare problem or issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    ### **Overview**

    You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

    **Reminder:** You will use your selected problem or issue again in upcoming assessments. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the
    _annotation_. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

    ### **Prepare**

    Conduct research in the Capella library to find a total of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles in relation to a selected healthcare problem or issue presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource.
    **You must select your healthcare-related issue or problem from the topic areas** presented in this resource.

    **Important Note:** Conduct a library search as needed. Review the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Research Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) for assistance. Be sure to review journal articles published within the past three to five years.

    ### **Write Your Paper**

    Write a 3–5 page paper in which you include the following:

    #### **Topic Identification**

    Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource. Write a brief overview of the healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

    · Summarize the healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe your interest in the problem or issue.

    · Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

    #### **Discussion of Research**

    Discuss your research and selection process for each of the three journal articles you have chosen to include in your annotated bibliography.

    · Describe your process of applying library research skills to identify the journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching.

    · Identify the keywords you used to select the articles.

    · Describe the criteria you used to select the resources, including the names of the databases you used.

    · What was the process like to locate relevant articles?

    · Assess the credibility of the information sources.

    · Determine whether each resource is from an academic, peer-reviewed journal.

    · Determine whether the publication is current (published within the last 3–5 years).

    · Determine whether information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

    · Assess the relevance of the information sources.

    · Explain how the healthcare problem or issue is addressed in each source.

    · Discuss what kind of contribution each resource provides.

    #### **Annotated Bibliography**

    Summarize each of the three current academic, peer-reviewed journal articles you chose, using the annotated bibliography organizational format. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:

    · List each full reference in APA format, followed immediately by its annotation.

    · Present your three current, annotated references in alphabetical order, according to the reference citation.

    · Double-space each reference and format it with a hanging indent.

    · Provide the full APA reference citation, including the author, date, title, publisher or publication, and any additional information required by APA style.

    · Write the annotation (summary) for each citation in paragraph form, using approximately 150 words (or 1–3 paragraphs) for each citation. Make sure to cite the article in your summary. Include the following components for each annotation:

    · Identify the purpose of the article.

    · Summarize the article.

    · Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

    #### **Summary**

    In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from the process of developing the annotated bibliography.

    ### **Academic Requirements**

    Your academic writing is expected to conform to the following requirements:

    ·
    **Writing:** Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    ·
    **Sources:** Integrate into text appropriate use of current scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. Use the
    [Evidence and APA](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540) guidelines provided. Cite the reference in its summary.

    ·
    **Formatting:** Include a title page and reference page, Times New Roman, 12 point.

    ·
    **Length:** Complete no more than 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.

    ·
    **References:** Although you are citing your three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles within the Annotated Bibliography section of this paper, be sure to also list your citations on a reference page at the end of your paper, along with any other resources you may have included.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 2 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662279/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    Submit your paper as an attached Microsoft Word document.

    ### **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of healthcare.

    · Summarize a healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe the process for selecting academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a healthcare problem or issue being researched.

    · Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography as it relates to the topic and the ability to use the annotated bibliography process for future assessments.

    · Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of healthcare.

    · Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.

    · Summarize academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.

    · Competency 5: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references

    **## nurs-fpx4000-assessment-02-supplement-applying-research-skills-A.pdf**

    Assessment 02 – Applying Research Skills

    For this assessment, you will research best practices related to a current health care
    problem. Your selected problem or issue may be utilized again in a future assessment.
    Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the
    following health care problems or issues:

    • Mental Health Stigma
    o Description: Many individuals with mental health conditions face stigma and

    discrimination, which can prevent them from seeking help and receiving
    appropriate care. This stigma can be perpetuated by societal attitudes, lack of
    awareness, and misinformation about mental health.

    o Interventions: Public awareness campaigns, mental health education in schools,
    workplace mental health programs, peer support groups, policy changes to
    protect individuals with mental health conditions, and training for healthcare
    providers on mental health issues.

    o Keywords: Mental health awareness, stigma reduction, mental health education,
    peer support, mental health policy, workplace mental health, mental health
    training, mental health services, mental health advocacy.

    • Chronic Disease Management
    o Description: Managing chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and

    heart disease can be challenging due to the need for ongoing medical care,
    lifestyle changes, and medication adherence. Poor management of chronic
    diseases can lead to complications and reduced quality of life.

    o Interventions: Patient education programs, chronic disease self-management
    workshops, telehealth for regular monitoring, integrated care models, community
    health programs, mobile health applications, and support for lifestyle changes
    such as diet and exercise.

    o Keywords: Chronic disease management, patient education, self-management,
    telehealth, integrated care, community health, mobile health, lifestyle changes,
    chronic disease prevention, chronic disease support.

    After you have selected one of the problems/issues from the list above, return to the detailed
    instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

    1

    **## cf_example_applying_library_research_skills1.pdf**

    1

    Applying Library Research Skills

    Your Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX4000: Developing a Nursing Perspective

    Instructor Name

    Month, Year

    2

    Healthcare Disparities

    Healthcare disparities among individuals from low socio-economic status (SES) have been a

    persistent issue, requiring attention and intervention from healthcare professionals, especially nurses.

    This paper aims to provide an overview of the topic's professional relevance to nursing. The process of

    article selection through library databases assessing the credibility of selected articles and an annotated

    bibliography of three peer-reviewed journal articles, highlighting key findings related to healthcare

    disparities for those with low SES is the focus of this paper. The paper concludes with reflections on the

    learnings derived from developing an annotated bibliography on this critical healthcare issue.

    Professional Relevance

    Nurses play a crucial role in addressing healthcare disparities, particularly for individuals from low

    SES. The social determinants of health, such as income, education, and living conditions, significantly impact

    health outcomes. Nurses, being at the forefront of patient care, must be equipped with the knowledge

    and skills to recognize, address, and advocate for vulnerable populations. Understanding healthcare

    disparities allows nurses to provide culturally competent care, contribute to policy changes, and engage

    in community-based interventions to improve health equity.

    Article Selection Process

    To compile relevant literature on healthcare disparities for individuals with low SES, a systematic

    approach to article selection is essential. Through the Capella Library, I was able to utilize various

    databases, such as PubMed and CINAHL. I limited my search by using appropriate key terms. Key terms

    included 'healthcare disparities,' 'low socio-economic status,' 'access to healthcare,' and 'nursing

    interventions.' I also used Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to enhance the search results. Filtering

    results to peer-reviewed articles ensured the reliability and academic rigor of the selected literature. I

    also limited the search to articles published within the past three years to ensure they were current.

    3

    Assessing Credibility

    Evaluating the credibility of selected articles is important. Criteria for credibility assessment

    include examining the author's qualifications, the source's reputation, and the presence of a peer-review

    process. Reviewing the methodology, data sources, and potential biases within the articles is crucial. The

    use of reputable journals, academic institutions, and established researchers enhances the credibility of the

    selected articles, ensuring the information is evidence-based and reliable.

    Annotated Bibliography

    Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health

    outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12487

    This longitudinal study examines the relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and

    limited public transportation. Limited financial resources often hinder access to private

    transportation, making it difficult for vulnerable populations to reach healthcare facilities promptly.

    Reliable and affordable public transportation can help ensure individuals can attend medical

    appointments, access preventive care, and adhere to treatment plans.

    Lack of transportation can lead to delayed or missed healthcare appointments, exacerbating

    health issues and contributes to disparities in health outcomes (Garcia et al., 2023). Public

    transportation not only facilitates timely access to healthcare services but also promotes

    preventive care, reducing the burden on emergency services. Reliable public transportation

    enhances overall community health by connecting individuals to resources such as pharmacies,

    grocery stores, and community centers.

    4

    Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

    review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2228.235.84

    Conducting a systematic review, this article investigates the challenges low SES individuals face in

    accessing primary care services. The findings underscore the need for policy changes to enhance

    healthcare access. Nurses can use this information to advocate for structural changes and

    contribute to the development of inclusive healthcare systems. One of the main interventions

    discussed in this article is the use of telemedicine to help expand healthcare services,

    particularly in remote areas, allowing individuals to be able to meet their providers virtually and

    not be hindered by the lack of transportation available to them (Jones et al., 2022). The article

    discusses how with telemedicine there are additional needs such as technology and internet

    connectivity which will need to be addressed as many with low SES are not able to afford the

    bandwidth needed for visual telemedicine meetings with their provider.

    Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal

    of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11232.dd0

    This article explores various nursing interventions aimed at addressing healthcare disparities in

    low SES populations. The study emphasizes the importance of culturally competent care and

    community engagement. The authors highlight successful strategies implemented by nurses in

    diverse settings, offering insights into best practices for promoting health equity. The

    interventions apply to areas such as transportation, assistance with prescriptions, and tele-

    health options (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The sample was a small sample in a rural area of West

    Virgina, but the interventions should be applicable to more areas including urban areas.

    The primary intervention this article discusses in the need for financial assistance programs

    and sliding scale fees to help make healthcare more affordable. The article also discusses the

    5

    need for financial assistance in areas such as affordable housing, education, and job assistance

    programs to facilitate individuals to be able to better care for themselves and their families.

    Reflections on Developing the Annotated Bibliography

    Developing the annotated bibliography provided valuable insights into the multifaceted nature

    of healthcare disparities for individuals with low SES. It highlighted the importance of interdisciplinary

    research and collaboration in addressing these disparities. I learned more about how healthcare

    disparities for individuals from low SES are a critical concern requiring the attention and action of

    healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. The process of creating an annotated bibliography and

    using a systematic article selection process along with assessing the credibility of selected literature, will

    assist me not only with this topic, but as I continue to research new topics during my education and

    professional careers.

    6

    References

    Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on

    health outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12487

    Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic

    Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2228.235.84

    Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal of

    Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11232.dd0

    **## Assignment2instructions.docx**

    Assignment 2

    Create a written assessment, including an annotated bibliography section, to document your research on a healthcare problem or an issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    Expand All

    ### **Introduction**

    In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing healthcare environment. Being adept at research helps you find the information you need. This assessment gives you practice with that skill by having you research a healthcare problem or issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

    ### **Overview**

    You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

    **Reminder:** You will use your selected problem or issue again in upcoming assessments. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the
    _annotation_. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

    ### **Prepare**

    Conduct research in the Capella library to find a total of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles in relation to a selected healthcare problem or issue presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource.
    **You must select your healthcare-related issue or problem from the topic areas** presented in this resource.

    **Important Note:** Conduct a library search as needed. Review the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Research Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) for assistance. Be sure to review journal articles published within the past three to five years.

    ### **Write Your Paper**

    Write a 3–5 page paper in which you include the following:

    #### **Topic Identification**

    Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the
    [**Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662283?wrap=1)

    Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]

    resource. Write a brief overview of the healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

    · Summarize the healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe your interest in the problem or issue.

    · Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

    #### **Discussion of Research**

    Discuss your research and selection process for each of the three journal articles you have chosen to include in your annotated bibliography.

    · Describe your process of applying library research skills to identify the journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching.

    · Identify the keywords you used to select the articles.

    · Describe the criteria you used to select the resources, including the names of the databases you used.

    · What was the process like to locate relevant articles?

    · Assess the credibility of the information sources.

    · Determine whether each resource is from an academic, peer-reviewed journal.

    · Determine whether the publication is current (published within the last 3–5 years).

    · Determine whether information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

    · Assess the relevance of the information sources.

    · Explain how the healthcare problem or issue is addressed in each source.

    · Discuss what kind of contribution each resource provides.

    #### **Annotated Bibliography**

    Summarize each of the three current academic, peer-reviewed journal articles you chose, using the annotated bibliography organizational format. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:

    · List each full reference in APA format, followed immediately by its annotation.

    · Present your three current, annotated references in alphabetical order, according to the reference citation.

    · Double-space each reference and format it with a hanging indent.

    · Provide the full APA reference citation, including the author, date, title, publisher or publication, and any additional information required by APA style.

    · Write the annotation (summary) for each citation in paragraph form, using approximately 150 words (or 1–3 paragraphs) for each citation. Make sure to cite the article in your summary. Include the following components for each annotation:

    · Identify the purpose of the article.

    · Summarize the article.

    · Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

    #### **Summary**

    In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from the process of developing the annotated bibliography.

    ### **Academic Requirements**

    Your academic writing is expected to conform to the following requirements:

    ·
    **Writing:** Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    ·
    **Sources:** Integrate into text appropriate use of current scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. Use the
    [Evidence and APA](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540) guidelines provided. Cite the reference in its summary.

    ·
    **Formatting:** Include a title page and reference page, Times New Roman, 12 point.

    ·
    **Length:** Complete no more than 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.

    ·
    **References:** Although you are citing your three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles within the Annotated Bibliography section of this paper, be sure to also list your citations on a reference page at the end of your paper, along with any other resources you may have included.

    **Example assessment:** You may use the
    [Assessment 2 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43407/files/7662279/download) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

    Submit your paper as an attached Microsoft Word document.

    ### **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of healthcare.

    · Summarize a healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

    · Describe the process for selecting academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a healthcare problem or issue being researched.

    · Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography as it relates to the topic and the ability to use the annotated bibliography process for future assessments.

    · Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of healthcare.

    · Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.

    · Summarize academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.

    · Competency 5: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella writing standards.

    · Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references

  • [Solved] WK 8 RESP 2 EPID

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WK8DISEPID.docx **## WK8DISEPID.docx** Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses ![A person in white protective suit and goggles looking at a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-8-resp-2-epid) Systematic reviews are an …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK8DISEPID.docx

    **## WK8DISEPID.docx**

    Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    ![A person in white protective suit and goggles looking at a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-8-resp-2-epid)

    Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the literature on a topic and do not necessarily have inclusion or exclusion criteria.

    Epidemiological meta-analyses are quantitative types of systematic reviews, in which summary measures of exposure–outcome associations are calculated based on the results of a selection of existing studies. In other words, a meta-analysis statistically combines the results from multiple studies, with the goal of calculating more precise measures, increasing sample size, or reducing bias in the combined results. The goal of meta-analysis is to obtain a more robust understanding of the relationship between an exposure and a health outcome than could be obtained from a single study. While meta-analyses are considered to be strong research designs because of their formal, statistical characteristics, they are not without weakness or critics. For instance, existing studies included in a meta-analysis may have strengths and limitations of their own.

    For this Discussion, you examine the validity and strengths and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in epidemiological research.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259934)

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/pages/week-8-learning-resources?module_item_id=6259934)

    · Driscoll, A., Grant, M. J., Carroll, D., Dalton, S., Deaton, C., Jones, I., Lehwaldt, D., McKee, G., Munyombwe, T., & Astin, F. (2018).
    [The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: A systematic review and meta-analysisLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1177%2F1474515117721561).
    _European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing_,
    _17_(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561

    · Seidler, A. L., Hunter, K. E., Cheyne, S., Berlin, J. A., Ghersi, D., & Askie, L. M. (2020).
    [Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane's role in embracing next-generation methodologiesLinks to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145).
    _Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews_,
    _10_, ED000145. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145

    · Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021).
    [The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0895435621000731%3F).
    _Journal of Clinical Epidemiology_,
    _134_, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001

    · Haidich, A. B. (2010).
    [Meta-analysis in medical researchLinks to an external site.](https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf).
    _Hippokratia, 14_ (Suppl. 1), 29–37. https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf

    · Melnyk, B. M., Kelly, S. A., Stephens, J., Dhakal, K., McGovern, C., Tucker, S., Hoying, J., McRae, K., Ault, S., Spurlock, E., & Bird, S. B. (2020).
    [Interventions to improve mental health, well-being, physical health, and lifestyle behaviors in physicians and nurses: A systematic reviewLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0890117120920451).
    _American Journal of Health Promotion_,
    _34_(8), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120920451

    · Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019).
    [How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-synthesesLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.annualreviews.org%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1146%2Fannurev-psych-010418-102803).
    _Annual Review of Psychology_,
    _70_, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259927)

    [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259937)

    To prepare:

    · Review the studies and articles provided in the Learning Resources. Consider the strengths and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Make sure you are clear on the difference between the two approaches.

    By Day 3 of Week 8

    **Post** a brief summary of your informed opinion regarding the validity of the use of systematic reviews
    **and** meta-analyses in epidemiological research. Include
    **at least two** strengths or limitations of each technique. Provide evidence from
    **at least one** of the articles in the Learning Resources to support and justify your position.

    By Day 6 of Week 8

    **Post** substantive responses to
    **at least two** colleagues
    **on two different days** who expressed a differing view to your own in their initial post. Include information from the Learning Resources in your responses as appropriate. You may expand on your peer’s posting with additional insight and resources about meta-analyses, ask a question to further the Discussion, or offer polite disagreement or critique, supported with evidence. You may also make a suggestion or comment that guides or facilitates the Discussion.

    RESPOND TO THIS DISCUSSION POST

    Simon

    Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are regarded as gold standards in evidence-based epidemiological research due to their structured methodology and comprehensive synthesis of available data. However, other types of literature reviews—such as narrative reviews, scoping reviews, and rapid reviews—also contribute meaningfully to the research landscape, each with distinct strengths and limitations.

    **Systematic reviews** use predefined protocols to identify, appraise, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific topic. One strength is their rigorous and reproducible approach, which minimizes bias and enhances the credibility of the findings (Page et al., 2021). Another strength is their ability to provide a high level of evidence that can guide clinical practice and policymaking. However, systematic reviews are often time-consuming and resource intensive. They also depend heavily on the quality of the included studies—poor-quality inputs can lead to unreliable conclusions (Haidich, 2010).

    **Meta-analyses** build on systematic reviews by statistically combining data from multiple studies. Their strengths include increased statistical power and the ability to detect small but clinically significant effects (Haidich, 2010). They also help in generalizing findings across diverse populations. Limitations include heterogeneity between studies (differences in populations, interventions, or outcomes), which can complicate interpretation. Additionally, meta-analyses can be skewed by publication bias or inclusion of low-quality studies (Seidler et al., 2020).

    The study by Driscoll et al. (2018) exemplifies how a systematic review and meta-analysis can produce compelling evidence—in this case, the association between nurse-to-patient ratios and patient outcomes in acute care settings. The review’s robust methodology and statistical synthesis allowed the authors to conclude that better staffing is associated with improved patient outcomes, which is valuable for healthcare planning and workforce policy.

    Besides systematic reviews and meta-analyses,
    **narrative reviews** are another common type. These are more flexible and provide a broad overview of a topic, often including expert opinions. While they are useful for theory development or exploring emerging areas, they are more susceptible to author bias due to the lack of a standardized methodology (Grant & Booth, 2009).

    **Scoping reviews** aim to map the existing literature on a topic and identify key concepts, gaps, and types of evidence available. They are particularly useful in areas with emerging evidence or interdisciplinary research. However, scoping reviews typically do not assess the quality of the included studies or provide detailed synthesis, limiting their utility for evidence-based practice (Munn et al., 2018).

    In conclusion, while systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer a high level of evidence and are integral to epidemiological research, other types of reviews also serve valuable purposes depending on the research objective. Each type has its strengths and limitations, and the choice of review should align with the goals, resources, and maturity of the research topic.

    **References**

    Driscoll, A., Grant, M. J., Carroll, D., Dalton, S., Deaton, C., Jones, I., Lehwaldt, D., McKee, G., Munyombwe, T., & Astin, F. (2018). The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17_(1), 6–22.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561)

    Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.
    _Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26_(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

    Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research.
    _Hippokratia, 14_(Suppl. 1), 29–37.
    [https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf)

    Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    _BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18_, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

    Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
    _Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134_, 178–189.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001)

    Seidler, A. L., Hunter, K. E., Cheyne, S., Berlin, J. A., Ghersi, D., & Askie, L. M. (2020). Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane's role in embracing next-generation methodologies.
    _Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10_, ED000145.
    [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK8DISEPID.docx**

    Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    ![A person in white protective suit and goggles looking at a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-8-resp-2-epid)

    Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the literature on a topic and do not necessarily have inclusion or exclusion criteria.

    Epidemiological meta-analyses are quantitative types of systematic reviews, in which summary measures of exposure–outcome associations are calculated based on the results of a selection of existing studies. In other words, a meta-analysis statistically combines the results from multiple studies, with the goal of calculating more precise measures, increasing sample size, or reducing bias in the combined results. The goal of meta-analysis is to obtain a more robust understanding of the relationship between an exposure and a health outcome than could be obtained from a single study. While meta-analyses are considered to be strong research designs because of their formal, statistical characteristics, they are not without weakness or critics. For instance, existing studies included in a meta-analysis may have strengths and limitations of their own.

    For this Discussion, you examine the validity and strengths and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in epidemiological research.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259934)

    [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/pages/week-8-learning-resources?module_item_id=6259934)

    · Driscoll, A., Grant, M. J., Carroll, D., Dalton, S., Deaton, C., Jones, I., Lehwaldt, D., McKee, G., Munyombwe, T., & Astin, F. (2018).
    [The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: A systematic review and meta-analysisLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1177%2F1474515117721561).
    _European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing_,
    _17_(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561

    · Seidler, A. L., Hunter, K. E., Cheyne, S., Berlin, J. A., Ghersi, D., & Askie, L. M. (2020).
    [Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane's role in embracing next-generation methodologiesLinks to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145).
    _Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews_,
    _10_, ED000145. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145

    · Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021).
    [The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0895435621000731%3F).
    _Journal of Clinical Epidemiology_,
    _134_, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001

    · Haidich, A. B. (2010).
    [Meta-analysis in medical researchLinks to an external site.](https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf).
    _Hippokratia, 14_ (Suppl. 1), 29–37. https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf

    · Melnyk, B. M., Kelly, S. A., Stephens, J., Dhakal, K., McGovern, C., Tucker, S., Hoying, J., McRae, K., Ault, S., Spurlock, E., & Bird, S. B. (2020).
    [Interventions to improve mental health, well-being, physical health, and lifestyle behaviors in physicians and nurses: A systematic reviewLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0890117120920451).
    _American Journal of Health Promotion_,
    _34_(8), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120920451

    · Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019).
    [How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-synthesesLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.annualreviews.org%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1146%2Fannurev-psych-010418-102803).
    _Annual Review of Psychology_,
    _70_, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259927)

    [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/155998/modules/items/6259937)

    To prepare:

    · Review the studies and articles provided in the Learning Resources. Consider the strengths and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Make sure you are clear on the difference between the two approaches.

    By Day 3 of Week 8

    **Post** a brief summary of your informed opinion regarding the validity of the use of systematic reviews
    **and** meta-analyses in epidemiological research. Include
    **at least two** strengths or limitations of each technique. Provide evidence from
    **at least one** of the articles in the Learning Resources to support and justify your position.

    By Day 6 of Week 8

    **Post** substantive responses to
    **at least two** colleagues
    **on two different days** who expressed a differing view to your own in their initial post. Include information from the Learning Resources in your responses as appropriate. You may expand on your peer’s posting with additional insight and resources about meta-analyses, ask a question to further the Discussion, or offer polite disagreement or critique, supported with evidence. You may also make a suggestion or comment that guides or facilitates the Discussion.

    RESPOND TO THIS DISCUSSION POST

    Simon

    Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are regarded as gold standards in evidence-based epidemiological research due to their structured methodology and comprehensive synthesis of available data. However, other types of literature reviews—such as narrative reviews, scoping reviews, and rapid reviews—also contribute meaningfully to the research landscape, each with distinct strengths and limitations.

    **Systematic reviews** use predefined protocols to identify, appraise, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific topic. One strength is their rigorous and reproducible approach, which minimizes bias and enhances the credibility of the findings (Page et al., 2021). Another strength is their ability to provide a high level of evidence that can guide clinical practice and policymaking. However, systematic reviews are often time-consuming and resource intensive. They also depend heavily on the quality of the included studies—poor-quality inputs can lead to unreliable conclusions (Haidich, 2010).

    **Meta-analyses** build on systematic reviews by statistically combining data from multiple studies. Their strengths include increased statistical power and the ability to detect small but clinically significant effects (Haidich, 2010). They also help in generalizing findings across diverse populations. Limitations include heterogeneity between studies (differences in populations, interventions, or outcomes), which can complicate interpretation. Additionally, meta-analyses can be skewed by publication bias or inclusion of low-quality studies (Seidler et al., 2020).

    The study by Driscoll et al. (2018) exemplifies how a systematic review and meta-analysis can produce compelling evidence—in this case, the association between nurse-to-patient ratios and patient outcomes in acute care settings. The review’s robust methodology and statistical synthesis allowed the authors to conclude that better staffing is associated with improved patient outcomes, which is valuable for healthcare planning and workforce policy.

    Besides systematic reviews and meta-analyses,
    **narrative reviews** are another common type. These are more flexible and provide a broad overview of a topic, often including expert opinions. While they are useful for theory development or exploring emerging areas, they are more susceptible to author bias due to the lack of a standardized methodology (Grant & Booth, 2009).

    **Scoping reviews** aim to map the existing literature on a topic and identify key concepts, gaps, and types of evidence available. They are particularly useful in areas with emerging evidence or interdisciplinary research. However, scoping reviews typically do not assess the quality of the included studies or provide detailed synthesis, limiting their utility for evidence-based practice (Munn et al., 2018).

    In conclusion, while systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer a high level of evidence and are integral to epidemiological research, other types of reviews also serve valuable purposes depending on the research objective. Each type has its strengths and limitations, and the choice of review should align with the goals, resources, and maturity of the research topic.

    **References**

    Driscoll, A., Grant, M. J., Carroll, D., Dalton, S., Deaton, C., Jones, I., Lehwaldt, D., McKee, G., Munyombwe, T., & Astin, F. (2018). The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    _European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17_(1), 6–22.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561)

    Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.
    _Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26_(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

    Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research.
    _Hippokratia, 14_(Suppl. 1), 29–37.
    [https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf)

    Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    _BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18_, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

    Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
    _Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134_, 178–189.
    [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001)

    Seidler, A. L., Hunter, K. E., Cheyne, S., Berlin, J. A., Ghersi, D., & Askie, L. M. (2020). Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane's role in embracing next-generation methodologies.
    _Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10_, ED000145.
    [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145)

    ## image1.jpeg