understanding the damages – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →understanding the damages
– 2 years ago
Validity determines whether a tool measures what it is supposed to measure and is a vital component in evaluating psychological measurement instruments (Messick, 1995). According to the authors, validity transcends mere testing; it encompasses the profound, deep, and meaningful inferences drawn from…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Validity determines whether a tool measures what it is supposed to measure and is a vital component in evaluating psychological measurement instruments (Messick, 1995). According to the authors, validity transcends mere testing; it encompasses the profound, deep, and meaningful inferences drawn from test scores (Messick, 1995). Validating self-esteem instruments involves a multifaceted approach that combines theoretical evaluations with statistical analysis to ensure the accuracy of tools and capture the complex constructs of self-esteem. There are well-known validity measures such as criterion-related, construct, content validity, and exploratory validity.
Content validity ensures that the elements in self-esteem measurement tools accurately represent the construct. Professionals evaluate the items for their pertinence and thoroughness (Haynes et al., 1995). The evaluations help to guarantee a thorough representation of all that self-esteem entails.
Construct validity is evaluated by assessing the extent to which the instruments relate to other measures as theoretically expected. Convergent validity involves positively relating scores, and discriminant validity occurs when scores do not strongly correlate (Clark & Watson, 1995).. Numerous studies have validated the RSEs’ convergent validity through positive association with measures of psychological well-being.
Criterion-related validity encompasses two dimensions: concurrent validity and predictive validity. These aspects assess how instrumental and relevant outcomes are related to offering a complete understanding. Self-esteem scores have been shown to predict mental health, social functioning, and academic performance (Orth & Robins, 2014). It is important to remember that self-esteem scores may not continuously predict mental health outcomes across different populations and cultural contexts.
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is widely known as a statistical technique used to validate the efficacy of the self-esteem measurement (Fabrigar et al., 1991). According to the authors, EFA comprises examinations of extraction methods fundamental for understanding the underlying factors embodied in the data. Through the comprehensive approach, EFA ensures that the tools for assessing self-esteem are valid and dependable. There is a need for meticulous approaches when using EFA, as relying solely on EFA could lead to incomplete and/or misleading interpretations of the data.
**New Methods**
Psychometric evaluations play a crucial role in measuring the internal consistency of assessment tools, ensuring items in the test are reliable, and capturing the constructs intended to be measured (Clark & Watson, 1995). Assessments help researchers better comprehend the underlying relationships and groupings among variables. If I were exploring a new method to validate self-esteem, the process I would use to validate the measure would be a systematic, evidence-based approach that ensures measures are psychometrically sound. I would focus on identifying the best practices for developing psychological scales, which provide a straightforward, step-by-step approach for researchers to use when creating new measurement tools, such as those for self-esteem(Boateng et al., 2018). The construct would have to be defined, items would be developed, content validity would be done, pilot testing and exploratory factor analysis would be conducted, and confirmatory factor analysis would be conducted (Rosenberg, 1965). According to the author, the best steps would be to define the construct clearly, produce items, do a content validity check and pilot test, implement factor analysis, validate the scale, assess reliability, confirm factor analysis, and do the final refinement. The process of validating the scale encompasses the critical discriminants of convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity (Rosenberg,1965). According to the author, the premier tool for assessing self-esteem scale is the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale (RSES), which involves robust approaches to development, conceptualization, and construct validation. RSES provides valuable insights into an individual’s self-perception.
**References**
Boateng, G.O., Neilands, T.B., Frongillo, E.A., Melgar-Quinonez, H. R. & Young, S.L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating health, social, and behavioral research scales: A primer. F _rontiers in Public Health, 6,_ 149. [https://doi.org/10.3389](https://doi.org/10.3389)
Clark, A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. _Psychological Assessment, 7(_ 3), 309–319.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., Straham, E.J. (1991). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. _Psychological Methods, 4_(3), 272-299. [https://doi.org/10.10371/1082](https://doi.org/10.10371/1082).
Haynes, S.N., Richard, D.C.S., & Kubany, E.S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessments: A functional approach to concepts and methods. _Psychological Assessments_ 7(3), 238–247. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.238](https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.238)
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from a person’s responses and performances as a scientific inquiry into score meaning. _American Psychologists 50_ (9), 741–749. [https://doi.org/10.1037.003](https://doi.org/10.1037.003)
Orth, U., & Robins, R.W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. _Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23_ (5), 381–387. [https://doi.org/10.117](https://doi.org/10.117)
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
[**Reply**](https://keiseruniversity.blackboard.com/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_565860_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_517041_1&forum_id=_2637670_1&message_id=_26915793_1#) [Quote](https://keiseruniversity.blackboard.com/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_565860_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_517041_1&forum_id=_2637670_1&message_id=_26915793_1#) [Email Author](https://keiseruniversity.blackboard.com/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_565860_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_517041_1&forum_id=_2637670_1&message_id=_26915793_1#) Select: [All](https://keiseruniversity.blackboard.com/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_565860_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_517041_1&forum_id=_2637670_1&message_id=_26915793_1#) [None](https://keiseruniversity.blackboard.com/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_565860_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_517041_1&forum_id=_2637670_1&message_id=_26915793_1#)
– [Message Actions](https://keiseruniversity.blackboard.com/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_565860_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_517041_1&forum_id=_2637670_1&message_id=_26915793_1#)
– Expand All
– Collapse All
– 2 years ago
refer to the attached document – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## edu599week3.docx **## edu599week3.docx** This week you will select a topic **(lack of support)** that will become your focus for the remainder of the term. The ideas and research resources you discuss this week will help you prepare you…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →refer to the attached document
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## edu599week3.docx
**## edu599week3.docx**
This week you will select a topic
**(lack of support)** that will become your focus for the remainder of the term. The ideas and research resources you discuss this week will help you prepare your first written assignment. Before you start your discussion post:
Brainstorm ideas to identify an education issue
**(lack of support)** that society, your school district
**(Atlanta, GA)**, or your workplace is facing.
Choose an education issue that can be solved or improved through learning.
Please respond to the following in your discussion post:
Explain your rationale as to why the education issue is important.
Analyze and evaluate the potential of this issue and solutions to impact student learning and/or organizational outcomes.
**## edu599week3.docx**
This week you will select a topic
**(lack of support)** that will become your focus for the remainder of the term. The ideas and research resources you discuss this week will help you prepare your first written assignment. Before you start your discussion post:
Brainstorm ideas to identify an education issue
**(lack of support)** that society, your school district
**(Atlanta, GA)**, or your workplace is facing.
Choose an education issue that can be solved or improved through learning.
Please respond to the following in your discussion post:
Explain your rationale as to why the education issue is important.
Analyze and evaluate the potential of this issue and solutions to impact student learning and/or organizational outcomes.
– 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## irss.docx **## irss.docx** Required reading is from Mingst, Chapter 9 called The Quest for Global Governance _, International Law, and Organizations_) there is a large body of international law in the world today. Do you think these laws are actually effective in inf…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## irss.docx
**## irss.docx**
Required reading is from Mingst, Chapter 9 called The Quest for Global Governance
_, International Law, and Organizations_)
there is a large body of international law in the world today. Do you think these laws are actually effective in influencing state behavior? Why or why not? Provide both theoretical reasoning for your answer and real-world example to back up your argument. NGOs have power and influence, but they are also limited in important ways. In the twenty-first century, describe where you think their power and influence come from, and what limitations NGOs face. Do you think NGOs are going to become more limited or more powerful in the future? Why? Provide examples to back up your argument. Which of the mechanisms is more effective in restricting war and maintaining global peace? Provide example of how each has been applied in real-world conflict.
_In this simulation, you are serving as a senior advisor to the President of the United States. The President seeks your counsel on a critical foreign policy decision: whether the U.S. should join the International Criminal Court (ICC)—a permanent tribunal established in 2002 to prosecute individuals for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. The ICC intervenes only when national judicial systems are unable or unwilling to investigate such crimes or where no legal system_
_exists._
As the President’s advisor,
your task is to provide a well-reasoned recommendation on whether the United States should join the ICC. In making your decision consider these three dimensions of ICC (key considerations):
Jurisdiction of the ICC: examine the scope and limits of the ICC's authority. Discuss how its jurisdiction might conflict with or complement U.S. national sovereignty. Consider one historical example of U.S. participation or withdrawal from global institutions.
Prosecution of International Crimes: evaluate how effectively the ICC addresses crimes of international concern. Analyze whether the ICC's prosecutorial efforts align with U.S. strategic, moral, and diplomatic interests in the global order. Reflect on how global cultures and human rights norms influence the perception of justice
Compatibility with U.S. Legal Principles: Assess how ICC membership aligns within the
**U.S.** Constitution and legal frameworks. Discuss potential challenges, including the principle of complementarity, and whether U.S. courts might defer to or clash with the ICC.
Based on these considerations, develop a compelling and balanced argument. What arguments /recommendations would you present to the President? In constructing your answer, you are expected to:
demonstrate knowledge of international institutions, legal systems, and global cultural norms and to reflect on the potential diplomatic, legal, and strategic consequences of the U.S. decision.
Apply the following International Relations theories to justify your position–Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism, Feminism (use evidence from course materials and one real-world example of ICC involvement to support your points as your argument must clearly engage with historical precedents, governmental structures, and the function of international institutions).
ONE PARAGRAPH AGREEING OR DISAGREEING TO THIS
International law has evolved as a key component of global governance, made to bring order and accountability to the international system. International law has grown to regulate warfare, diplomacy, trade, environmental issues, and human rights, aiming to create cooperation in the global environment (Mingst p. 218). The theories of neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism have contrasting views on the potential for this cooperation. Neorealists argue that when there is a lack of central authority, states are most concerned with their survival therefore acting following national interests. This will often involve zero-sum thinking and a focus on relative gains (Griffiths p.14). Due to this, using this perspective, cooperation is rare and short-lived as the states fear losing their power. This view helps explain actions such as the United States withdrawing from the Paris Agreement as the national interest trumped long-term global cooperation. In contrast, neoliberal institutionalists see cooperation as not only a possibility but common thanks to the roles of institutions reducing uncertainty and enforcing agreements (McGlinchey p. 23). These institutions, such as the WTO or UN, create spaces where states can go after mutual gains despite anarchy (Mingst p. 223). One example of this is the European Union which began with economic cooperation in coal and steel, however, it developed into a broader political union, showing how institutions can change a state's behavior and interests.
Between the two, neoliberal institutionalism offers a better explanation of today’s international cooperation, especially in areas like climate policy, disease control, and trade, where collective benefits outweigh the costs of working together. This leads to the debate on whether cooperation in technical areas can create more politicized issues. Some scholars argue that technical cooperation because it builds trust and familiarity among groups, can pave the way for collaboration on harder political matters. This has been demonstrated by the development of the European Union, which started with technical economic integration but evolved into a political and even security-based community. While not completely true—deep political divides can still block progress—examples like the EU and global cooperation on pandemic response suggest that technical collaboration can lay the groundwork for broader political cooperation (Mingst, p. 246). Overall, while realism captures the constraints on state behavior, the success of institutional cooperation today suggests that neoliberal institutionalism provides a better framework for understanding the patterns of cooperation in the modern international system.
**## irss.docx**
Required reading is from Mingst, Chapter 9 called The Quest for Global Governance
_, International Law, and Organizations_)
there is a large body of international law in the world today. Do you think these laws are actually effective in influencing state behavior? Why or why not? Provide both theoretical reasoning for your answer and real-world example to back up your argument. NGOs have power and influence, but they are also limited in important ways. In the twenty-first century, describe where you think their power and influence come from, and what limitations NGOs face. Do you think NGOs are going to become more limited or more powerful in the future? Why? Provide examples to back up your argument. Which of the mechanisms is more effective in restricting war and maintaining global peace? Provide example of how each has been applied in real-world conflict.
_In this simulation, you are serving as a senior advisor to the President of the United States. The President seeks your counsel on a critical foreign policy decision: whether the U.S. should join the International Criminal Court (ICC)—a permanent tribunal established in 2002 to prosecute individuals for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. The ICC intervenes only when national judicial systems are unable or unwilling to investigate such crimes or where no legal system_
_exists._
As the President’s advisor,
your task is to provide a well-reasoned recommendation on whether the United States should join the ICC. In making your decision consider these three dimensions of ICC (key considerations):
Jurisdiction of the ICC: examine the scope and limits of the ICC's authority. Discuss how its jurisdiction might conflict with or complement U.S. national sovereignty. Consider one historical example of U.S. participation or withdrawal from global institutions.
Prosecution of International Crimes: evaluate how effectively the ICC addresses crimes of international concern. Analyze whether the ICC's prosecutorial efforts align with U.S. strategic, moral, and diplomatic interests in the global order. Reflect on how global cultures and human rights norms influence the perception of justice
Compatibility with U.S. Legal Principles: Assess how ICC membership aligns within the
**U.S.** Constitution and legal frameworks. Discuss potential challenges, including the principle of complementarity, and whether U.S. courts might defer to or clash with the ICC.
Based on these considerations, develop a compelling and balanced argument. What arguments /recommendations would you present to the President? In constructing your answer, you are expected to:
demonstrate knowledge of international institutions, legal systems, and global cultural norms and to reflect on the potential diplomatic, legal, and strategic consequences of the U.S. decision.
Apply the following International Relations theories to justify your position–Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism, Feminism (use evidence from course materials and one real-world example of ICC involvement to support your points as your argument must clearly engage with historical precedents, governmental structures, and the function of international institutions).
ONE PARAGRAPH AGREEING OR DISAGREEING TO THIS
International law has evolved as a key component of global governance, made to bring order and accountability to the international system. International law has grown to regulate warfare, diplomacy, trade, environmental issues, and human rights, aiming to create cooperation in the global environment (Mingst p. 218). The theories of neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism have contrasting views on the potential for this cooperation. Neorealists argue that when there is a lack of central authority, states are most concerned with their survival therefore acting following national interests. This will often involve zero-sum thinking and a focus on relative gains (Griffiths p.14). Due to this, using this perspective, cooperation is rare and short-lived as the states fear losing their power. This view helps explain actions such as the United States withdrawing from the Paris Agreement as the national interest trumped long-term global cooperation. In contrast, neoliberal institutionalists see cooperation as not only a possibility but common thanks to the roles of institutions reducing uncertainty and enforcing agreements (McGlinchey p. 23). These institutions, such as the WTO or UN, create spaces where states can go after mutual gains despite anarchy (Mingst p. 223). One example of this is the European Union which began with economic cooperation in coal and steel, however, it developed into a broader political union, showing how institutions can change a state's behavior and interests.
Between the two, neoliberal institutionalism offers a better explanation of today’s international cooperation, especially in areas like climate policy, disease control, and trade, where collective benefits outweigh the costs of working together. This leads to the debate on whether cooperation in technical areas can create more politicized issues. Some scholars argue that technical cooperation because it builds trust and familiarity among groups, can pave the way for collaboration on harder political matters. This has been demonstrated by the development of the European Union, which started with technical economic integration but evolved into a political and even security-based community. While not completely true—deep political divides can still block progress—examples like the EU and global cooperation on pandemic response suggest that technical collaboration can lay the groundwork for broader political cooperation (Mingst, p. 246). Overall, while realism captures the constraints on state behavior, the success of institutional cooperation today suggests that neoliberal institutionalism provides a better framework for understanding the patterns of cooperation in the modern international system.
Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.
– 2 years ago
explain homeland utilties – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →explain homeland utilties
– 2 years ago
Develop a 10-slide business PowerPoint for the economic issue you have been working with as your topic in the previous assessment. You will then present this PowerPoint using Kaltura and submit the video. – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Develop a 10-slide business PowerPoint for the economic issue you have been working with as your topic in the previous assessment. You will then present this PowerPoint using Kaltura and submit the video.
– 2 years ago
[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Analyze the financial management and ethical practices of the not-for-profit organization you chose for your strategic analysis. Specifically, address the following **critical elements:** 1. **Analysis:** 1. *…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)
Analyze the financial management and ethical practices of the not-for-profit organization you chose for your strategic analysis.
Specifically, address the following **critical elements:**
1. **Analysis:**
1. **Finances:**
1. Discuss the organization's current **budgetary resources, structure, and responsibilities**.
2. Discuss the organization’s current **fundraising campaigns, grant possibilities, and planned giving opportunities** and their impact on the overall budget.
3. Determine potential challenges to the organization’s financial operation based on your analysis of its overall **financial management**.
2. **Ethics:**
1. Discuss the organization's handling of **budget and fundraising transparency**, specifically regarding its adherence to established codes, principles, and ethics of the industry.
2. Discuss **ethical considerations** the organization faces related to conflict of interest, privacy, and compensation.
3. Evaluate the impact of the organization’s ethical practices on its **public image.**
2. **Conclusion:** Write a conclusion to your paper that summarizes the organization’s finances and ethics.
Submission, APA, 2 1/2 pages
– 2 years ago
Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue. – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
– 2 years ago
You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply. Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five year…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.
Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.
Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
DISCUSSION 1
**State and Federal Advocacy**
Advocacy can be defined as action by a physician to promote social, economic, educational, and political changes that ameliorate the suffering and threats to human health and well-being that he or she identifies through his or her professional work and expertise (Kuehne et al., 2022). However, advocacy is not only a professional responsibility; it also shapes legislation, leading to more accessible and advanced health care.
Healthcare professionals can get involved with organizations like the American Nurses Association (ANA), the American Medical Association (AMA), and the American Public Health Association (APHA). These organizations advocate for patients and providers through legislative action with federal and state legislators who help shape healthcare policies. They also support research and evidence-based practices to improve healthcare outcomes.
One can also participate in legislative hearings, which provide a platform to influence policymakers on specific issues directly. Testifying at hearings allows individuals and organizations to present their perspectives and expertise to lawmakers, becoming a part of the official legislative record, thereby informing lawmakers about the issue. This also increases public awareness and enables citizens to engage in policymaking. Studies show that advocating for Medicaid expansion in non-expansion states has increased access to care and reduced preventable hospitalizations (Lin et al., 2021).
Healthcare professionals can leverage their clinical knowledge and research to inform policymakers. They can use data to identify trends, patterns, and relationships. Using data eliminates guesswork and allows decisions to be based on evidence.
Advocacy is an important aspect in healthcare. Getting involved with professional organizations, participating in legislative hearings, and using data to inform policy can help transform the legislative environment
DISCUSSION 2
**Nursing Advocacy Actions to Improve Health Care at the State or Federal Level**
Nursing advocacy is not confined to the bedside, it also extends to courtrooms, boardrooms, and the halls of government. Nurses are educationally and professionally equipped to influence healthcare decisions, drawing on their firsthand knowledge of patient care and system challenges. As trusted professionals and the largest group within the healthcare workforce, the voices of nurses carry significant weight in shaping both healthcare delivery and policy at the state and federal level. This advocacy may be achieved through various actions, including participating in policy discussions, joining professional nursing organizations, and exercising the right to vote. By engaging in these actions, nurses help mold the system to improve patient outcomes, promote equity, and strengthen the overall healthcare system.
**Policy Discussions**
In order to grasp how the system functions and how choices are made, nurses and advanced practice nurses should attend legislative sessions at the municipal, state, or federal levels; the acquisition of knowledge on how the system works helps nurses have a direct impact in shaping policy by enabling them to communicate their perspectives in ways that resonate with legislators and lobbyists (Morris, 2023). Additionally, establishing ties with legislators who draft healthcare legislation is a way of taking part in policy discussions. This can be done by contacting the state representative and attempting to establish a two-way communication system that may build rapport (Morris, 2023).
**Joining Professional Organizations**
Joining professional nursing organizations empowers nurses to play a vital role in improving healthcare at both the state and federal levels. Organizations, such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) and state nursing associations, provide a unified voice that advocates for policies affecting nursing practice, patient care, and public health (ANA, 2024). By becoming members, nurses gain access to policy education, legislative updates, and opportunities to participate directly in advocacy efforts, such as serving on policy committees, contributing to position statements, or testifying before lawmakers (ANA, 2024). These organizations frequently offer platforms for networking, collaboration, and supporting research, which contribute to more informed and effective policy development.
**Exercising the Right to Vote**
Voting is a vital way for nurses to advocate not only for the health of their patients and communities, but also for addressing critical professional issues that are influenced by policy. Challenges like burnout, high patient-to-nurse ratios, workplace violence, restricted scope of practice, and limited resources for safe care are widespread in the profession (American Nurse Journal, 2022). However, these concerns often go unaddressed in legislation due to the low voter turnout among nurses and the limited number of nurses holding public office (American Nurse Journal, 2022). As a result, the nursing profession remains underrepresented across all levels of government
– 2 years ago