Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] 1600 words paper on Women’s Rights Abolition

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Original Paper written from scratch and well-formatted. – 2 years ago **1600 words paper on Women’s Rights Abolition** NOT RATED Purchase the answer to view it ![blurred-text](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/blurred-text.c4cde9f021be0abed13ca77c3d6d43d3.png) – SRPPAPER.doc ![homework questi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Original Paper written from scratch and well-formatted.

    – 2 years ago

    **1600 words paper on Women’s Rights Abolition**

    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    ![blurred-text](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/blurred-text.c4cde9f021be0abed13ca77c3d6d43d3.png)

    –

    SRPPAPER.doc

    ![homework question](https://www.sweetstudy.com/assets/images/loader.e99f1ef323fecd089c1cdcaaadcd1f9b.gif)

    plagiarism checkPurchase $40

  • [Solved] WK7 DISC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy. – Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Review      the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent      (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
    – Review      the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and      development of this health policy.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] WEEK 6ASS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Nurses can advocate for healthcare policies to promote justice, fairness, and health equity at facility, local, state, national, and global levels. Writing a letter of concern for or support towards a particular policy or legislation is an effective way to hold leaders accountable in their positions…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Nurses can advocate for healthcare policies to promote justice, fairness, and health equity at facility, local, state, national, and global levels. Writing a letter of concern for or support towards a particular policy or legislation is an effective way to hold leaders accountable in their positions.

    **Assignment Instructions:**

    In the Week 2 Policy Letter Checkpoint, you began this assignment by completing the following:

    – Identifying a pending healthcare bill that needs improvement or proposing a new bill recommendation relevant to your current practice, community health needs, or personal interests.
    – Explaining why that bill or recommendation is important.
    – Identifying the leader or change agent (local, state, and national leader/legislator) who is appropriate to advocate for this policy change or adoption.
    – Identifying the official mailing or email address of this leader. _Note: Your elected officials’ email and physical addresses are available on their websites. You can find out who represents you on the_ [_House_Links to an external site.](https://www.house.gov/representatives) _and_ [_Senate_Links to an external site.](https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm) websites.
    – Identified and discussed your advocacy efforts with community members.

    For this assignment you will use the bill and leader identified in Week 2 to compose a letter or email to the leader or change agent using the following sections. Use proper letter or email format including address lines, greeting, subject line, date, salutation, and professional closing. Use this [sample letterLinks to an external site.](https://www.apa.org/advocacy/guide/sample-letters.pdf) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader-na.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=7255&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apa.org%2Fadvocacy%2Fguide%2Fsample-letters.pdf "Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader") as a guide. Use complete sentences with professional language and accurate grammar/sentence structure. The letter or email should be concise, with a maximum of 2 pages. Use APA-recommended font.

    **Paragraph 1 Introduction:**

    – Introduce yourself, your current role, and your relationship to the leader or change agent.
    – Summarize why this issue is important to your role.
    – Explain your perspective on this issue.
    – State your position/request/reason for writing.
    – _Note: If your letter pertains to a specific piece of legislation, identify it accordingly as federal or state, e.g., H.R. 1234 (for a House resolution) or S.B. 234 (for a Senate bill)._

    **Paragraph 2 Summary & History:**

    – Summarize the pending healthcare bill or the lack there of if you chose to recommend a new bill. (Attach existing bill or link to piece of legislation to this letter.)
    – Outline the history or evolution of this piece of pending legislation.
    – Outline the policy development process at this level.
    – Explain your rationale for recommending a new or changed healthcare bill.

    **Paragraphs 3 & 4 Recommendations:**

    – **If you are supporting the recommended changes proposed by the bill,** describe its impact on patient care and your nursing role at bedside, higher organizational levels, local, state, national, and global levels.
    – **If you are recommending a new piece of legislation**, describe the need for it and the impact(s) of the lack of policy on patient care and your nursing role at bedside, higher organizational levels, local, state, national, and global levels (as applicable). Draft a proposal for the new bill.
    – **If you are recommending an improvement or additions to an existing piece of legislation**, propose specific areas within the existing bill that need improvement. Refer to specifics in the existing bill or legislation and draft changes.  Describe the areas that you would want to change and how they could benefit patient care, community or population health, or nursing practice at the bedside, higher organizational levels, local, state, national, and global levels (as applicable).
    – Provide justification and at least 2 pieces of factual evidence to support your recommendations with proper APA in-text citations.
    – Describe the conversation you had with your identified community member. You should have met with this person (face to face, over the phone, or online) to discuss the policy you are advocating for during week 2. In your letter to your representative, explain:
    – The community member's positive feedback towards your efforts.
    – The community member's concerns or additions they think you should include.

    **Paragraph 5 Closing:**

    – Explain what you want the leader to do or steps you want them to take and request a response from them on the issue.
    – Explain how you can help facilitate this change or be involved in the policy development process.
    – Provide additional resources or recommendations as applicable.

    **Appendix:**

    – On a separate page, include a 2-4 paragraph reflection on this assignment addressing the following prompts:
    – State if you mailed or emailed the letter and include the date it was sent.
    – Describe your experience, feelings, and perceptions throughout this assignment.
    – Do you think this is an effective way to advocate for your changes? Why or why not?
    – Describe the conversation with your community member(s). State their name, date, and location the conversation took place. How did including stakeholder validation tool help your advocacy efforts?
    – What is your expected response from your legislator or representative?
    – How will you follow up or what are your next steps or other actions you can take?
    – What are your views about the nurse’s role in healthcare policy advocacy after completing this assignment?

    **Assignment Submission Requirement:**

    – Submit the assignment (letter and appendix) to dropbox as a Word document.
    – Send the letter or email to the leader after completing the assignment.

    – [\
    \
    PolicyAdvocacyLetter1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/policyadvocacyletter1-docx "PolicyAdvocacyLetter1.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] week 2 and three

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Week 1 Discussion – Risk Management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink, has been in the news a lot lately. Companies that are closely associated with their founder are often influenced by their founder's actions. Speculation is that some of Musk's re…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink, has been in the news a lot lately. Companies that are closely associated with their founder are often influenced by their founder's actions. Speculation is that some of Musk's recent behavior has raised the level of risk for Tesla. Read the article, " [The Biggest Risk That Will Determine Tesla's Fate: Elon Musk HimselfLinks to an external site.](https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/15/the-biggest-risk-that-will-determine-teslas-fate-elon-musk-himself.html)." Then, respond to the following:

    – First, comment on your perspective of Elon Musk's behavior and if you feel that it is positively or negatively influencing Tesla.
    – Second, add any additional steps that you think Tesla could take to minimize the effect of their founder, Elon Musk.
    – Finally, add your own example of a growing company that may fall into the same category as Tesla with a well-known founder and any specific steps that they could take to minimize this type of risk.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Vision for Learning Article Critique 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf** Page 1 of 2 Article Critique General Directions Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it carefully and reflect on it, then fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

  • [Solved] Vision for Learning Article Critique 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf** Page 1 of 2 Article Critique General Directions Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it carefully and reflect on it, then fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

  • [Solved] Vision for Learning Article Critique 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf** Page 1 of 2 Article Critique General Directions Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it carefully and reflect on it, then fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

  • [Solved] Health Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## handoutppquiz.docx – ProductsCreatedby.pdf **## handoutppquiz.docx** Products Created by the Student Attach the product(s) created for your PEEP to the assignment submission link. **Product(s) must be designed and created by the student. Your product should include…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## handoutppquiz.docx

    – ProductsCreatedby.pdf

    **## handoutppquiz.docx**

    Products Created by the Student

    Attach the product(s) created for your PEEP to the assignment submission link.

    **Product(s) must be designed and created by the student.

    Your product should include the Healthy People 2030 topic and objective and behavioral objectives.

    ****My Healthy People 2030 topic: Pregnancy and Childbirth-Objective is Increasing the proportion of women who receives early and adequate prenatal care – MICH-08.

    AND Behavioral objective.

    References must be cited on the product you created using correct 7th edition APA and include a minimum of four references: two professional websites and two evidence-based articles from peer-reviewed scholarly journals. Don't forget in-text citations.

    On your teaching you stated that:

    1. PowerPoint presentation with large fonts that were easily readable, brief bullet-pointed text per slide, and illustrations.

    2. Simple quiz that was given after teaching event.

    Please see Rubic for grading

    **ProductsCreatedby.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/productscreatedby-pdf)

    **ProductsCreatedby.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/productscreatedby-pdf)

    **## handoutppquiz.docx**

    Products Created by the Student

    Attach the product(s) created for your PEEP to the assignment submission link.

    **Product(s) must be designed and created by the student.

    Your product should include the Healthy People 2030 topic and objective and behavioral objectives.

    ****My Healthy People 2030 topic: Pregnancy and Childbirth-Objective is Increasing the proportion of women who receives early and adequate prenatal care – MICH-08.

    AND Behavioral objective.

    References must be cited on the product you created using correct 7th edition APA and include a minimum of four references: two professional websites and two evidence-based articles from peer-reviewed scholarly journals. Don't forget in-text citations.

    On your teaching you stated that:

    1. PowerPoint presentation with large fonts that were easily readable, brief bullet-pointed text per slide, and illustrations.

    2. Simple quiz that was given after teaching event.

    Please see Rubic for grading

    **ProductsCreatedby.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/productscreatedby-pdf)

    **## handoutppquiz.docx**

    Products Created by the Student

    Attach the product(s) created for your PEEP to the assignment submission link.

    **Product(s) must be designed and created by the student.

    Your product should include the Healthy People 2030 topic and objective and behavioral objectives.

    ****My Healthy People 2030 topic: Pregnancy and Childbirth-Objective is Increasing the proportion of women who receives early and adequate prenatal care – MICH-08.

    AND Behavioral objective.

    References must be cited on the product you created using correct 7th edition APA and include a minimum of four references: two professional websites and two evidence-based articles from peer-reviewed scholarly journals. Don't forget in-text citations.

    On your teaching you stated that:

    1. PowerPoint presentation with large fonts that were easily readable, brief bullet-pointed text per slide, and illustrations.

    2. Simple quiz that was given after teaching event.

    Please see Rubic for grading

    **ProductsCreatedby.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/productscreatedby-pdf)

  • [Solved] work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In Week 1 of this course (see below), you were asked to schedule a meeting with your faculty advisor to discuss the role of the professional therapist and to support your development in marriage and family therapy. Please attach a summary of this meeting as your assignment submission this week. Use …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In Week 1 of this course (see below), you were asked to schedule a meeting with your faculty advisor to discuss the role of the professional therapist and to support your development in marriage and family therapy. Please attach a summary of this meeting as your assignment submission this week.

    Use the following guidelines to structure the meeting with your faculty advisor:

    – Get acquainted.
    – Introduce yourself to your faculty advisor. Provide a brief personal and professional history.
    – Ask your faculty advisor about his or her experience as a marriage and family therapist.
    – Discuss the knowledge, skills, and abilities that are essential for success both as a graduate learner and as a marriage and family therapist.
    – Identify major milestones in the marriage and family therapy program (for example, residency, practicum, and internship) and steps to support preparation early in the program.
    – Be prepared to discuss three academic or professional goals for the next 12 months.

    Address learner dispositions as assessed throughout the program.

    – 2 years ago