Executive Solution Overview
see attached **files (2)** – ## ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf **## ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx** PADM 712 **Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Assignment Instructions** …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
see attached
**files (2)**
– ## ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
– ## ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf
**## ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 712
**Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Assignment Instructions**
Overview
Leadership modeling is something we do that determines how we make decisions when in a place of authority. This assignment is meant to compare and contrast the models and reflect on what these models mean to the student in their leadership journey.
Instructions
Choose one or more biblical leaders: Jesus, David, Moses or other biblical leaders and evaluate their leadership style and approaches and compare to what you have learned so far in this Module: Week.
What were their specialized approaches and in the case of leaders other than Jesus, what were their failings as a leader that we can learn from? Also consider limitations we as Christians have on bringing our faith into our workplace.
This body of the paper should be 14 – 16 pages (3,500 – 4,000 words) in length.
A minimum of 14 references are required and formatted using APA Style.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Synthesis
and Thesis
Development
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student exhibits a defined and
clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly
defined and well-constructed
to help guide the reader
throughout the assignment.
Student builds upon the thesis
of the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts,
figures, and/or statements.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support
the key focus of
assignment.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of the
assignment.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Command of
Subject
Matter
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student provides
comprehensive analysis of
details, facts, and concepts in
a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented provide
an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
Criteria Ratings Points
Application 42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly
understands and excels in
explaining all major points. An
original, unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts, and
findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes
an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed
paragraphs, and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s ability
to plan and organize research
in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student explains
the majority of
points and concepts
in the assignment.
Learner
demonstrates a
good skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents
an above average
level of
preparedness, with
few formatting
errors.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Learner applies some points
and concepts incorrectly.
Student uses a variety of
formatting styles, with some
inconsistencies throughout
the paper. Assignment does
not have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Grammar
and Spelling
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar
used throughout essay. Posts
contain fewer than 2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Posts contain fewer
than 5 errors in
grammar or spelling
that distract the
reader from the
content.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Posts contain fewer than 8
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
APA Format
Compliance
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in
the interpretation or execution
of proper APA format.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Few errors (3 to 4)
noted in the
interpretation or
execution of proper
APA format.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors noted in
the interpretation or
execution of proper APA
format.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
Required
Length and
Sources
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimum 14-16 pages and 14
references or exceeded.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Minimum 12 pages
and 12 references
or exceeded.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimum 10 pages and 10
references or exceeded.
0 pts
No
Marks
/ 18
pts
Total Points: –
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
**## ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Synthesis
and Thesis
Development
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student exhibits a defined and
clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly
defined and well-constructed
to help guide the reader
throughout the assignment.
Student builds upon the thesis
of the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts,
figures, and/or statements.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support
the key focus of
assignment.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of the
assignment.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Command of
Subject
Matter
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student provides
comprehensive analysis of
details, facts, and concepts in
a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented provide
an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
Criteria Ratings Points
Application 42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly
understands and excels in
explaining all major points. An
original, unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts, and
findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes
an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed
paragraphs, and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s ability
to plan and organize research
in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student explains
the majority of
points and concepts
in the assignment.
Learner
demonstrates a
good skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents
an above average
level of
preparedness, with
few formatting
errors.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Learner applies some points
and concepts incorrectly.
Student uses a variety of
formatting styles, with some
inconsistencies throughout
the paper. Assignment does
not have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Grammar
and Spelling
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar
used throughout essay. Posts
contain fewer than 2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Posts contain fewer
than 5 errors in
grammar or spelling
that distract the
reader from the
content.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Posts contain fewer than 8
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
APA Format
Compliance
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in
the interpretation or execution
of proper APA format.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Few errors (3 to 4)
noted in the
interpretation or
execution of proper
APA format.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors noted in
the interpretation or
execution of proper APA
format.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
Required
Length and
Sources
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimum 14-16 pages and 14
references or exceeded.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Minimum 12 pages
and 12 references
or exceeded.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimum 10 pages and 10
references or exceeded.
0 pts
No
Marks
/ 18
pts
Total Points: –
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
**## ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 712
**Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Assignment Instructions**
Overview
Leadership modeling is something we do that determines how we make decisions when in a place of authority. This assignment is meant to compare and contrast the models and reflect on what these models mean to the student in their leadership journey.
Instructions
Choose one or more biblical leaders: Jesus, David, Moses or other biblical leaders and evaluate their leadership style and approaches and compare to what you have learned so far in this Module: Week.
What were their specialized approaches and in the case of leaders other than Jesus, what were their failings as a leader that we can learn from? Also consider limitations we as Christians have on bringing our faith into our workplace.
This body of the paper should be 14 – 16 pages (3,500 – 4,000 words) in length.
A minimum of 14 references are required and formatted using APA Style.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Synthesis
and Thesis
Development
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student exhibits a defined and
clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly
defined and well-constructed
to help guide the reader
throughout the assignment.
Student builds upon the thesis
of the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts,
figures, and/or statements.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support
the key focus of
assignment.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of the
assignment.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Command of
Subject
Matter
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student provides
comprehensive analysis of
details, facts, and concepts in
a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented provide
an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
Criteria Ratings Points
Application 42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly
understands and excels in
explaining all major points. An
original, unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts, and
findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes
an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed
paragraphs, and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s ability
to plan and organize research
in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student explains
the majority of
points and concepts
in the assignment.
Learner
demonstrates a
good skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents
an above average
level of
preparedness, with
few formatting
errors.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Learner applies some points
and concepts incorrectly.
Student uses a variety of
formatting styles, with some
inconsistencies throughout
the paper. Assignment does
not have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Grammar
and Spelling
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar
used throughout essay. Posts
contain fewer than 2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Posts contain fewer
than 5 errors in
grammar or spelling
that distract the
reader from the
content.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Posts contain fewer than 8
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
APA Format
Compliance
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in
the interpretation or execution
of proper APA format.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Few errors (3 to 4)
noted in the
interpretation or
execution of proper
APA format.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors noted in
the interpretation or
execution of proper APA
format.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
Required
Length and
Sources
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimum 14-16 pages and 14
references or exceeded.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Minimum 12 pages
and 12 references
or exceeded.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimum 10 pages and 10
references or exceeded.
0 pts
No
Marks
/ 18
pts
Total Points: –
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
**## ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**
PADM 712
**Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Assignment Instructions**
Overview
Leadership modeling is something we do that determines how we make decisions when in a place of authority. This assignment is meant to compare and contrast the models and reflect on what these models mean to the student in their leadership journey.
Instructions
Choose one or more biblical leaders: Jesus, David, Moses or other biblical leaders and evaluate their leadership style and approaches and compare to what you have learned so far in this Module: Week.
What were their specialized approaches and in the case of leaders other than Jesus, what were their failings as a leader that we can learn from? Also consider limitations we as Christians have on bringing our faith into our workplace.
This body of the paper should be 14 – 16 pages (3,500 – 4,000 words) in length.
A minimum of 14 references are required and formatted using APA Style.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Synthesis
and Thesis
Development
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student exhibits a defined and
clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly
defined and well-constructed
to help guide the reader
throughout the assignment.
Student builds upon the thesis
of the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts,
figures, and/or statements.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support
the key focus of
assignment.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of the
assignment.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Command of
Subject
Matter
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student provides
comprehensive analysis of
details, facts, and concepts in
a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented provide
an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
Criteria Ratings Points
Application 42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly
understands and excels in
explaining all major points. An
original, unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts, and
findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes
an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed
paragraphs, and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s ability
to plan and organize research
in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student explains
the majority of
points and concepts
in the assignment.
Learner
demonstrates a
good skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents
an above average
level of
preparedness, with
few formatting
errors.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Learner applies some points
and concepts incorrectly.
Student uses a variety of
formatting styles, with some
inconsistencies throughout
the paper. Assignment does
not have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 42
pts
Grammar
and Spelling
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar
used throughout essay. Posts
contain fewer than 2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Posts contain fewer
than 5 errors in
grammar or spelling
that distract the
reader from the
content.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Posts contain fewer than 8
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
APA Format
Compliance
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in
the interpretation or execution
of proper APA format.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Few errors (3 to 4)
noted in the
interpretation or
execution of proper
APA format.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors noted in
the interpretation or
execution of proper APA
format.
0 pts
Not
Present
/ 18
pts
Required
Length and
Sources
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimum 14-16 pages and 14
references or exceeded.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Minimum 12 pages
and 12 references
or exceeded.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimum 10 pages and 10
references or exceeded.
0 pts
No
Marks
/ 18
pts
Total Points: –
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric |
PADM712_B01_202640
Leave a Reply