[Solved] Module 5 Journal Question

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

**Public Health Department-**

**files (2)**

– ## Module5JournalQuestion.docx

– ## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx

**## Module5JournalQuestion.docx**

**Module 5 Journal Question**

**My Public Health Department-NEW YORK CITY (Use hypertension)**

Go to your Public Health Department website and identify a health outreach program or campaign on a topic of interest. Identify the project managers or staff tasked to develop, implement, and evaluate the health outreach program or campaign. If a nurse or nurse practitioner is part of the team, describe their role, project responsibility, or job description. If there are no nursing staff on board, discuss the importance and contributions that may be provided by a nurse or advanced practice provider. Lastly, describe the overall contributions and nursing/advanced practice nursing perspective on the development, implementation, and evaluation of health outreach programs and campaigns.

**Journal Response Expectations**

**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

**Learning Materials**

Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapters 3, 8 & 9. (50 pages)

University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)

**Additional Resources:**

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_

_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022).
_A & B recommendations_.

[https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation-topics/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations](https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation-topics/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations)

[https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening](https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening)

UNICEF (n.d.).
_Cholera Toolkit_.
[https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4](https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4)

**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**

Graduate Journal Rubric v1.

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quali

ty of

Information

Weight:

40

%

/ 8

Developme

nt/Connecti

on Weight:

%

40

/ 8

0

points

**(0**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing or inac

–

curate. Answer

is inaccurate

and does not

address the

prompt.

points

2.5

**pts**

**(5.6**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing key el

–

ements.

Answer is par

–

tially inaccu

–

rate and misses

elements in the

prompt. Claims

are lacking in

–

formation to

be fully

thought out.

points

6.4

**(6.4**

**)**

**pts**

Response to

quiz question is

appropriate

and accurate.

Answer is ap

–

propriate and

responses to

the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

thorough and

detailed.

Answer is clear

and concise

and responses

to all aspects

of the prompt.

Claims are jus

–

tified and

plausible.

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Connections

are either miss

–

ing or inaccu

–

rate in the

discussion.

5.6

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Connections

are included by

missing key in

–

formation in

the discussion.

points

6.4

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Connections

are appropri

–

ately and accu

–

rately

discussed.

8

points

**)**

**pts**

**(8**

Connections

are insightful,

reflective, and

completely

discussed.

Total

/ 20

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Writing &

Mechanics

Weight:

%

20

/ 4

0

points

**)**

**pts**

**(0**

Style is inap

–

propriate or

does not ad

–

dress given

purpose.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

–

ing, and

punctuation.

2.8

points

**pts**

**)**

**(2.8**

Style is some

–

what appropri

–

ate to purpose.

Repetitive me

–

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

–

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

3.2

**(3.2**

**pts**

**)**

Style is appro

–

priate to the

given purpose.

Word choice is

specific and

purposeful, and

somewhat var

–

ied throughout.

Minimal me

–

chanical, typo

–

graphical, are

present, but

are not overly

distracting.

points

4

**pts**

**(4**

**)**

Style shows

originality and

creativity.

Word choice is

dynamic and

varied. Free of

mechanical, ty

–

pographical,

errors.

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

2/2

**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**

Graduate Journal Rubric v1.

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quali

ty of

Information

Weight:

40

%

/ 8

Developme

nt/Connecti

on Weight:

%

40

/ 8

0

points

**(0**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing or inac

–

curate. Answer

is inaccurate

and does not

address the

prompt.

points

2.5

**pts**

**(5.6**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing key el

–

ements.

Answer is par

–

tially inaccu

–

rate and misses

elements in the

prompt. Claims

are lacking in

–

formation to

be fully

thought out.

points

6.4

**(6.4**

**)**

**pts**

Response to

quiz question is

appropriate

and accurate.

Answer is ap

–

propriate and

responses to

the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

thorough and

detailed.

Answer is clear

and concise

and responses

to all aspects

of the prompt.

Claims are jus

–

tified and

plausible.

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Connections

are either miss

–

ing or inaccu

–

rate in the

discussion.

5.6

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Connections

are included by

missing key in

–

formation in

the discussion.

points

6.4

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Connections

are appropri

–

ately and accu

–

rately

discussed.

8

points

**)**

**pts**

**(8**

Connections

are insightful,

reflective, and

completely

discussed.

Total

/ 20

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Writing &

Mechanics

Weight:

%

20

/ 4

0

points

**)**

**pts**

**(0**

Style is inap

–

propriate or

does not ad

–

dress given

purpose.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

–

ing, and

punctuation.

2.8

points

**pts**

**)**

**(2.8**

Style is some

–

what appropri

–

ate to purpose.

Repetitive me

–

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

–

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

3.2

**(3.2**

**pts**

**)**

Style is appro

–

priate to the

given purpose.

Word choice is

specific and

purposeful, and

somewhat var

–

ied throughout.

Minimal me

–

chanical, typo

–

graphical, are

present, but

are not overly

distracting.

points

4

**pts**

**(4**

**)**

Style shows

originality and

creativity.

Word choice is

dynamic and

varied. Free of

mechanical, ty

–

pographical,

errors.

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

2/2

**## Module5JournalQuestion.docx**

**Module 5 Journal Question**

**My Public Health Department-NEW YORK CITY (Use hypertension)**

Go to your Public Health Department website and identify a health outreach program or campaign on a topic of interest. Identify the project managers or staff tasked to develop, implement, and evaluate the health outreach program or campaign. If a nurse or nurse practitioner is part of the team, describe their role, project responsibility, or job description. If there are no nursing staff on board, discuss the importance and contributions that may be provided by a nurse or advanced practice provider. Lastly, describe the overall contributions and nursing/advanced practice nursing perspective on the development, implementation, and evaluation of health outreach programs and campaigns.

**Journal Response Expectations**

**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

**Learning Materials**

Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapters 3, 8 & 9. (50 pages)

University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)

**Additional Resources:**

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_

_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022).
_A & B recommendations_.

[https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation-topics/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations](https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation-topics/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations)

[https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening](https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening)

UNICEF (n.d.).
_Cholera Toolkit_.
[https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4](https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4)

**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**

Graduate Journal Rubric v1.

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quali

ty of

Information

Weight:

40

%

/ 8

Developme

nt/Connecti

on Weight:

%

40

/ 8

0

points

**(0**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing or inac

–

curate. Answer

is inaccurate

and does not

address the

prompt.

points

2.5

**pts**

**(5.6**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing key el

–

ements.

Answer is par

–

tially inaccu

–

rate and misses

elements in the

prompt. Claims

are lacking in

–

formation to

be fully

thought out.

points

6.4

**(6.4**

**)**

**pts**

Response to

quiz question is

appropriate

and accurate.

Answer is ap

–

propriate and

responses to

the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

thorough and

detailed.

Answer is clear

and concise

and responses

to all aspects

of the prompt.

Claims are jus

–

tified and

plausible.

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Connections

are either miss

–

ing or inaccu

–

rate in the

discussion.

5.6

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Connections

are included by

missing key in

–

formation in

the discussion.

points

6.4

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Connections

are appropri

–

ately and accu

–

rately

discussed.

8

points

**)**

**pts**

**(8**

Connections

are insightful,

reflective, and

completely

discussed.

Total

/ 20

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Writing &

Mechanics

Weight:

%

20

/ 4

0

points

**)**

**pts**

**(0**

Style is inap

–

propriate or

does not ad

–

dress given

purpose.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

–

ing, and

punctuation.

2.8

points

**pts**

**)**

**(2.8**

Style is some

–

what appropri

–

ate to purpose.

Repetitive me

–

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

–

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

3.2

**(3.2**

**pts**

**)**

Style is appro

–

priate to the

given purpose.

Word choice is

specific and

purposeful, and

somewhat var

–

ied throughout.

Minimal me

–

chanical, typo

–

graphical, are

present, but

are not overly

distracting.

points

4

**pts**

**(4**

**)**

Style shows

originality and

creativity.

Word choice is

dynamic and

varied. Free of

mechanical, ty

–

pographical,

errors.

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

2/2

**## Module5JournalQuestion.docx**

**Module 5 Journal Question**

**My Public Health Department-NEW YORK CITY (Use hypertension)**

Go to your Public Health Department website and identify a health outreach program or campaign on a topic of interest. Identify the project managers or staff tasked to develop, implement, and evaluate the health outreach program or campaign. If a nurse or nurse practitioner is part of the team, describe their role, project responsibility, or job description. If there are no nursing staff on board, discuss the importance and contributions that may be provided by a nurse or advanced practice provider. Lastly, describe the overall contributions and nursing/advanced practice nursing perspective on the development, implementation, and evaluation of health outreach programs and campaigns.

**Journal Response Expectations**

**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words; no citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

**Learning Materials**

Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).
_Population health:_ _Creating A culture of wellness_ (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapters 3, 8 & 9. (50 pages)

University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox.
[https://ctb.ku.edu/en](https://ctb.ku.edu/en)

**Additional Resources:**

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).
_Healthy People_

_2030._ [www.health.gov/healthypeople](https://www.health.gov/healthypeople)

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022).
_A & B recommendations_.

[https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation-topics/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations](https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation-topics/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations)

[https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening](https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening)

UNICEF (n.d.).
_Cholera Toolkit_.
[https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4](https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4)

**## Module_Journal_RUBRIC.docx**

Graduate Journal Rubric v1.

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quali

ty of

Information

Weight:

40

%

/ 8

Developme

nt/Connecti

on Weight:

%

40

/ 8

0

points

**(0**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing or inac

–

curate. Answer

is inaccurate

and does not

address the

prompt.

points

2.5

**pts**

**(5.6**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

missing key el

–

ements.

Answer is par

–

tially inaccu

–

rate and misses

elements in the

prompt. Claims

are lacking in

–

formation to

be fully

thought out.

points

6.4

**(6.4**

**)**

**pts**

Response to

quiz question is

appropriate

and accurate.

Answer is ap

–

propriate and

responses to

the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to

quiz question is

thorough and

detailed.

Answer is clear

and concise

and responses

to all aspects

of the prompt.

Claims are jus

–

tified and

plausible.

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Connections

are either miss

–

ing or inaccu

–

rate in the

discussion.

5.6

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Connections

are included by

missing key in

–

formation in

the discussion.

points

6.4

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Connections

are appropri

–

ately and accu

–

rately

discussed.

8

points

**)**

**pts**

**(8**

Connections

are insightful,

reflective, and

completely

discussed.

Total

/ 20

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets**

**Expectations**

**Exceeds**

**Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Writing &

Mechanics

Weight:

%

20

/ 4

0

points

**)**

**pts**

**(0**

Style is inap

–

propriate or

does not ad

–

dress given

purpose.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

–

ing, and

punctuation.

2.8

points

**pts**

**)**

**(2.8**

Style is some

–

what appropri

–

ate to purpose.

Repetitive me

–

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

–

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

3.2

**(3.2**

**pts**

**)**

Style is appro

–

priate to the

given purpose.

Word choice is

specific and

purposeful, and

somewhat var

–

ied throughout.

Minimal me

–

chanical, typo

–

graphical, are

present, but

are not overly

distracting.

points

4

**pts**

**(4**

**)**

Style shows

originality and

creativity.

Word choice is

dynamic and

varied. Free of

mechanical, ty

–

pographical,

errors.

**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

2/2