My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] hi

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    assess please – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## 6004assessment2criterion..docx **## 6004assessment2criterion..docx** **Competencies Measured** By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: · Competenc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    assess please

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## 6004assessment2criterion..docx

    **## 6004assessment2criterion..docx**

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    · Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.

    · Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform healthcare laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.

    · Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    · Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws. Clearly articulates the effects of benchmark underperformance and draws sound conclusions about the potential repercussions of inaction, based on credible evidence and relates information to stakeholder group.

    **Proficient**

    Explains to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    **Basic**

    Identifies to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws. irrespective of a particular need.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.**

    **Distinguished**

    Succinctly summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines; analyzes the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines. Identifies clear cause-and-effect relationships and the influence of those factors on specific recommendations.

    **Proficient**

    Summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice change guidelines and the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.

    **Basic**

    Provides a summary that paints an unclear picture of a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines and/or does not expand on environmental factors that can affect recommended practice guidelines.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not summarize a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines or identify environmental factors that can affect recommended practice guidelines.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change. Provides clear and compelling justification, substantiated by credible evidence.

    **Proficient**

    Explains how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    **Basic**

    Identifies how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change but does not provide context or rationale to support the content.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.**

    **Distinguished**

    Provides a perceptive and succinct explanation of why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Offers clear and convincing rationale for stakeholder and group engagement and how it strengthens policy and facilitates changes in practice to improve quality outcomes.

    **Proficient**

    Explains why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines change to improve quality and outcomes.

    **Basic**

    Identifies stakeholders and groups who are not the most logical choices to be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.**

    **Distinguished**

    Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Makes a compelling case for the importance of stakeholder collaboration and considers stakeholder perspectives by addressing possible objections.

    **Proficient**

    Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    **Basic**

    Presents stakeholder collaboration strategies for implementing a proposed policy and practice guidelines that lack clear relevance or insight into the positions and perspectives of the stakeholder group.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions.

    **Criterion 7**

    **Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.**

    **Distinguished**

    Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.

    **Proficient**

    Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    **Basic**

    Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    [**WalkMe**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42104/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2113422) [**Chat**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42104/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2113422)

    **## 6004assessment2criterion..docx**

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze relevant healthcare laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

    · Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    · Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.

    · Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.

    · Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform healthcare laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.

    · Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    · Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.

    · Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    · Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    · Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    · Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    **Scoring Guide**

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    **Criterion 1**

    **Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws. Clearly articulates the effects of benchmark underperformance and draws sound conclusions about the potential repercussions of inaction, based on credible evidence and relates information to stakeholder group.

    **Proficient**

    Explains to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    **Basic**

    Identifies to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws. irrespective of a particular need.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain to stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws.

    **Criterion 2**

    **Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.**

    **Distinguished**

    Succinctly summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines; analyzes the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines. Identifies clear cause-and-effect relationships and the influence of those factors on specific recommendations.

    **Proficient**

    Summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice change guidelines and the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.

    **Basic**

    Provides a summary that paints an unclear picture of a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines and/or does not expand on environmental factors that can affect recommended practice guidelines.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not summarize a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines or identify environmental factors that can affect recommended practice guidelines.

    **Criterion 3**

    **Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.**

    **Distinguished**

    Explains how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change. Provides clear and compelling justification, substantiated by credible evidence.

    **Proficient**

    Explains how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    **Basic**

    Identifies how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change but does not provide context or rationale to support the content.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.

    **Criterion 4**

    **Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.**

    **Distinguished**

    Provides a perceptive and succinct explanation of why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Offers clear and convincing rationale for stakeholder and group engagement and how it strengthens policy and facilitates changes in practice to improve quality outcomes.

    **Proficient**

    Explains why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines change to improve quality and outcomes.

    **Basic**

    Identifies stakeholders and groups who are not the most logical choices to be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.

    **Criterion 5**

    **Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.**

    **Distinguished**

    Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Makes a compelling case for the importance of stakeholder collaboration and considers stakeholder perspectives by addressing possible objections.

    **Proficient**

    Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    **Basic**

    Presents stakeholder collaboration strategies for implementing a proposed policy and practice guidelines that lack clear relevance or insight into the positions and perspectives of the stakeholder group.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.

    **Criterion 6**

    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.**

    **Distinguished**

    Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    **Proficient**

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    **Basic**

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions.

    **Criterion 7**

    **Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.**

    **Distinguished**

    Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.

    **Proficient**

    Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    **Basic**

    Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations.

    **Non Performance**

    Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    [**WalkMe**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42104/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2113422) [**Chat**](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/42104/pages/assessment-2-instructions?module_item_id=2113422)

  • [Solved] D8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. **Application of Course Knowledge**: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. 1. Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact? How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepar…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. **Application of Course Knowledge**: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.

    1. Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact? How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepared nurse?
    2. Describe how course learning activities and assignments will help you achieve Program Outcome 3: Engage in lifelong personal and professional growth through reflective practice and appreciation of cultural diversity. (Cultural Humility)
    3. Describe how course assignments or activities will help you achieve ONE of the sub-competencies from the advanced-level nursing education competencies from AACN Essentials Competency 3.1 Advance Population Health
    – 3.1j Assess the efficacy of a system’s capability to serve a target sub-population's healthcare needs.
    – 3.1k Analyze primary and secondary population health data for multiple populations against relevant benchmarks.
    – 3.1l Use established or evolving methods to determine population-focused priorities for care.
    – 3.1m Develop a collaborative approach with relevant stakeholders to address population healthcare needs, including evaluation methods.
    – 3.1n Collaborate with appropriate stakeholders to implement a sociocultural and linguistically responsive intervention plan.
    2. **Professionalism in Communication**: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] See attached 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SWEETWK8-3.docx **## SWEETWK8-3.docx** **MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK**. 1 initial post **AND** 1 peer response. No scholarly sources required. 3 paragraphs in initial post. **Initial post** **Step 1**: Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Answer all question…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SWEETWK8-3.docx

    **## SWEETWK8-3.docx**

    **MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK**. 1 initial post
    **AND** 1 peer response. No scholarly sources required. 3 paragraphs in initial post.

    **Initial post**

    **Step 1**: Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Answer all questions/criteria below with explanations and detail. No scholarly sources are required.

    ·
    **Paragraph 1**: How do you envision using the concepts learned in this course in your future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse?
    **This is for a transcultural nursing class.**

    ·
    **Paragraph 2**: Examine the following program outcomes. Select one and reflect on how your learning in the course assisted in helping to achieve that outcome.

    · PO 4: Integrates clinical judgment in professional decision making and implementation of the nursing process.

    ·
    **Paragraph 3**: Examine the following competencies from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials. Select one and reflect on how the course assisted in achieving that competency.

    · 9.5c Demonstrate sensitivity to the values of others.

    **Peer response – RESPOND TO THIS PEER**

    K.H. – “There are multiple ways that I envision using the concepts learned in this course in my future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse. I will ensure that I consider the beliefs and cultural values of clients. Showing respect and compassion is essential to build trust and foster a supportive patient care. These principles will allow me to learn about different cultural backgrounds, practices, and values to better understand and meet the needs of the patient. Showing empathy provides patient-centered care that addresses not only their medical needs but also their emotional and cultural concerns.

         Program outcome three states the importance of communicating effectively with the patient population and other healthcare providers in managing the healthcare of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. Being bilingual has also enabled me to better communicate and understand patients from Spanish-speaking cultures. This allows me to share medical information clearly and understand the cultural aspects that influence their health experiences and views. It is important to also be mindful of verbal and nonverbal communication with diverse cultures. This course has taught me the importance of effective communication. It is essential to use resources that help communicate in the client’s preferred language and to respect cultural differences in how people communicate (Chamberlain University, 2025). Nurses should recognize the factors that affect healthcare interactions and address them properly because cultural elements can greatly influence communication, including assessments and nursing care (Chamberlain University, 2025). This course has taught me that following this outcome will improve my communication with both patients and other healthcare providers.

         The competency 9.5c from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials states that nurses achieve this competency by demonstrating sensitivity to the values of others. This course has helped me develop verbal and nonverbal communication skills by exposing me to diverse cultures and their practices. It has also helped me connect better with patients from diverse backgrounds by providing assessment strategies that consider their cultural beliefs and preferences. This leads to more effective and respectful communication in healthcare. Being bilingual in English and Spanish, as well as familiar with Hispanic culture, has greatly benefited my nursing career. I have been able to communicate effectively with the Spanish-speaking community regarding their healthcare needs during their hospital stays.”

    **## SWEETWK8-3.docx**

    **MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK**. 1 initial post
    **AND** 1 peer response. No scholarly sources required. 3 paragraphs in initial post.

    **Initial post**

    **Step 1**: Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Answer all questions/criteria below with explanations and detail. No scholarly sources are required.

    ·
    **Paragraph 1**: How do you envision using the concepts learned in this course in your future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse?
    **This is for a transcultural nursing class.**

    ·
    **Paragraph 2**: Examine the following program outcomes. Select one and reflect on how your learning in the course assisted in helping to achieve that outcome.

    · PO 4: Integrates clinical judgment in professional decision making and implementation of the nursing process.

    ·
    **Paragraph 3**: Examine the following competencies from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials. Select one and reflect on how the course assisted in achieving that competency.

    · 9.5c Demonstrate sensitivity to the values of others.

    **Peer response – RESPOND TO THIS PEER**

    K.H. – “There are multiple ways that I envision using the concepts learned in this course in my future nursing practice as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse. I will ensure that I consider the beliefs and cultural values of clients. Showing respect and compassion is essential to build trust and foster a supportive patient care. These principles will allow me to learn about different cultural backgrounds, practices, and values to better understand and meet the needs of the patient. Showing empathy provides patient-centered care that addresses not only their medical needs but also their emotional and cultural concerns.

         Program outcome three states the importance of communicating effectively with the patient population and other healthcare providers in managing the healthcare of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. Being bilingual has also enabled me to better communicate and understand patients from Spanish-speaking cultures. This allows me to share medical information clearly and understand the cultural aspects that influence their health experiences and views. It is important to also be mindful of verbal and nonverbal communication with diverse cultures. This course has taught me the importance of effective communication. It is essential to use resources that help communicate in the client’s preferred language and to respect cultural differences in how people communicate (Chamberlain University, 2025). Nurses should recognize the factors that affect healthcare interactions and address them properly because cultural elements can greatly influence communication, including assessments and nursing care (Chamberlain University, 2025). This course has taught me that following this outcome will improve my communication with both patients and other healthcare providers.

         The competency 9.5c from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials states that nurses achieve this competency by demonstrating sensitivity to the values of others. This course has helped me develop verbal and nonverbal communication skills by exposing me to diverse cultures and their practices. It has also helped me connect better with patients from diverse backgrounds by providing assessment strategies that consider their cultural beliefs and preferences. This leads to more effective and respectful communication in healthcare. Being bilingual in English and Spanish, as well as familiar with Hispanic culture, has greatly benefited my nursing career. I have been able to communicate effectively with the Spanish-speaking community regarding their healthcare needs during their hospital stays.”

  • [Solved] BLOG

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Substance Use, Addiction/Impulse Control Disorder – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SubstanceUseAddictionimpulseControlDisorder.docx **## SubstanceUseAddictionimpulseControlDisorder.docx** **Substance Use, Addiction/Impulse Control Disorder** In this Blog, you will have the opportunity to teach yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Substance Use, Addiction/Impulse Control Disorder

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SubstanceUseAddictionimpulseControlDisorder.docx

    **## SubstanceUseAddictionimpulseControlDisorder.docx**

    **Substance Use, Addiction/Impulse Control Disorder**

    In this Blog, you will have the opportunity to teach your peers about a specific substance use and/or addiction/impulse control disorder. A Blog is a conversational, informal written piece on a topic. Your faculty will assign you a particular illness and the approved treatment for the illness to create a presentation to share with your peers.

    **Construct** a Blog post, not to exceed 1,500–2,000 words

    You will be assigned from the following list:

    · Opioid Use Disorder

    · Vivitrol

    · Suboxone

    · Methadone

    · Lofexidine

    · Alcohol Use Disorder

    · Acamprosate

    · Naltrexone

    · Disulfiram

    · Phenobarbital (seizure control due to alcohol withdrawal)

    · Chlordiazepoxide

    · Cannabis Use Disorder

    · Nefazodone*

    · Fluoxetine*

    · Gabapentin*

    · Buspirone*

    · Stimulant Use Disorder (cocaine, methamphetamine)

    · Antipsychotic Medications*

    · Combination Injectable Naltrexone*

    · Bupropion*

    · Gabapentin*

    · Tobacco Use Disorder

    · Nicotine replacement patch

    · Nicotine replacement gum

    · Nicotine replacement inhaler

    · Zyban

    · Sedative/Hypnotic Anxiolytic Use Disorder

    · Gabapentin*

    · Buspirone*

    · Flumazenil*

    · Trazodone*

    · Binge Eating Disorder (BED)

    · Lisdexamphetamine

    **Post** your Blog response by doing the following:

    · Identify the substance or addiction with discussion on pertinent diagnostic criteria for the use disorder.

    · Identify the street names of the substance for the use disorder.

    · Describe how someone can use or abuse the substance (oral, smoke, IV, etc.).

    · Describe the symptoms of someone under the influence of this substance.

    · Describe the symptoms of someone under the withdrawal of this substance.

    After describing the substance, discuss the treatment recommendations by doing the following:

    · Identify the first-line treatment options.

    · Identify the FDA-approved medications for the substance.

    **Note:** If there are no FDA-approved medications, describe any evidenced-based, clinically acceptable off-label medications to treat the illness.

    · Identify the proposed mechanisms of action for the medication to treat the illness.

    · Describe the common side effects of the medication.

    · Describe how the patient should take the medication.

    · Identify any baseline and/or ongoing tests and assessment(s) needed when taking the medication.

    · Describe the non-pharmacologic intervention recommendations.

    This Assignment requires a minimum of
    **three (3)** peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course Learning Resources.

    **Note:** You will need to include the APA formatting citation of all references used with a Reference list.

    **## SubstanceUseAddictionimpulseControlDisorder.docx**

    **Substance Use, Addiction/Impulse Control Disorder**

    In this Blog, you will have the opportunity to teach your peers about a specific substance use and/or addiction/impulse control disorder. A Blog is a conversational, informal written piece on a topic. Your faculty will assign you a particular illness and the approved treatment for the illness to create a presentation to share with your peers.

    **Construct** a Blog post, not to exceed 1,500–2,000 words

    You will be assigned from the following list:

    · Opioid Use Disorder

    · Vivitrol

    · Suboxone

    · Methadone

    · Lofexidine

    · Alcohol Use Disorder

    · Acamprosate

    · Naltrexone

    · Disulfiram

    · Phenobarbital (seizure control due to alcohol withdrawal)

    · Chlordiazepoxide

    · Cannabis Use Disorder

    · Nefazodone*

    · Fluoxetine*

    · Gabapentin*

    · Buspirone*

    · Stimulant Use Disorder (cocaine, methamphetamine)

    · Antipsychotic Medications*

    · Combination Injectable Naltrexone*

    · Bupropion*

    · Gabapentin*

    · Tobacco Use Disorder

    · Nicotine replacement patch

    · Nicotine replacement gum

    · Nicotine replacement inhaler

    · Zyban

    · Sedative/Hypnotic Anxiolytic Use Disorder

    · Gabapentin*

    · Buspirone*

    · Flumazenil*

    · Trazodone*

    · Binge Eating Disorder (BED)

    · Lisdexamphetamine

    **Post** your Blog response by doing the following:

    · Identify the substance or addiction with discussion on pertinent diagnostic criteria for the use disorder.

    · Identify the street names of the substance for the use disorder.

    · Describe how someone can use or abuse the substance (oral, smoke, IV, etc.).

    · Describe the symptoms of someone under the influence of this substance.

    · Describe the symptoms of someone under the withdrawal of this substance.

    After describing the substance, discuss the treatment recommendations by doing the following:

    · Identify the first-line treatment options.

    · Identify the FDA-approved medications for the substance.

    **Note:** If there are no FDA-approved medications, describe any evidenced-based, clinically acceptable off-label medications to treat the illness.

    · Identify the proposed mechanisms of action for the medication to treat the illness.

    · Describe the common side effects of the medication.

    · Describe how the patient should take the medication.

    · Identify any baseline and/or ongoing tests and assessment(s) needed when taking the medication.

    · Describe the non-pharmacologic intervention recommendations.

    This Assignment requires a minimum of
    **three (3)** peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course Learning Resources.

    **Note:** You will need to include the APA formatting citation of all references used with a Reference list.

  • [Solved] week 8 re

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    #1 In this course wrap-up discussion, please reflect on your experience in the course and address the following items: – Identify one of your major takeaways from this course. – What aspects of the course helped you achieve this? – Choose one of the course student learning outcomes (CSLO). Please ex…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    #1

    In this course wrap-up discussion, please reflect on your experience in the course and address the following items:

    – Identify one of your major takeaways from this course.
    – What aspects of the course helped you achieve this?
    – Choose one of the course student learning outcomes (CSLO). Please explain how you could apply your chosen learning outcome to your practice and/or have achieved this outcome having participated in this class.
    – How will you apply this knowledge to your practice and career?

    This course has been a truly enriching experience, and as I reflect on it, several key aspects stand out. For the course student learning outcome, “Develop your role as a nurse advocate that can impact legislative development (CSLO 4)”, I feel this course has significantly empowered me. While directly impacting legislative development might seem like a distant goal early in one's career, this course has provided me with the foundational understanding and the impetus to actively engage in advocacy. I now recognize that nurses have a powerful voice and a crucial role to play in shaping healthcare policy. I can apply this learning outcome in several ways. On a smaller scale, I can advocate for my patients within the healthcare system by understanding their rights, ensuring their voices are heard, and navigating complex bureaucratic processes. Furthermore, I can engage in professional organizations and participate in initiatives aimed at influencing local and state-level policies related to patient care, working conditions, and public health. This course has instilled in me the importance of staying informed about legislative issues affecting healthcare and the various avenues through which nurses can make their voices heard, whether it's through contacting legislators, participating in grassroots efforts, or contributing to policy briefs. Looking ahead, I believe the knowledge gained in this course will be invaluable in my practice and career. The development of my advocacy skills will empower me to be a more effective voice for my patients and the nursing profession. As I grow in my career, I envision myself becoming increasingly involved in advocacy efforts, contributing to the development of policies that promote patient well-being and advance the practice of nursing. This course has laid a strong foundation for me to become a more knowledgeable and impactful nurse.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] NUR 505 530 DISCUSSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## NUR505530wk6dis.pdf – ## NUR505assignwk6.pdf **## NUR505530wk6dis.pdf** Module 6 Discussion Case Study: C.Z. Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sour…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## NUR505530wk6dis.pdf

    – ## NUR505assignwk6.pdf

    **## NUR505530wk6dis.pdf**

    Module 6 Discussion

    Case Study: C.Z.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Purpose: Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental
    health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying
    evidence-based research.

    Scenario: C.Z. is a 20-year-old Caucasian male who is in his second year of college.
    He is seeking treatment due to persistent fears that campus security and
    the local police are tracking and surveilling him. He cites occasional lags in
    his internet speed as evidence that surveillance devices are interfering with
    his electronics. His intense anxiety about this has begun getting in the way
    of his ability to complete schoolwork, and his friends are concerned – he
    says they have told him, “you’re not making sense.”

    C.Z. occasionally laughs abruptly and inappropriately and sometimes stops
    speaking mid-sentence, looking off in the distance as though he sees or
    hears something. He expresses concern about electronics in the room
    (phone, computer) potentially being monitored and asks repeatedly about
    patient confidentiality, stating that he wants to be sure the police won’t be
    informed about his treatment. His beliefs are fixed, and if they are
    challenged, his tone becomes hostile.

    Question
    s:

    Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and NP
    guidelines. At all times, explain your answers.

    1. Discuss the etiology, course, and the structural/functional
    abnormalities of schizophrenia.

    2. Discuss the evidence-based pharmacological and
    nonpharmacological treatment for this patient using the US Clinical
    Guidelines.

    Module 6 Discussion

    Caring for Korean, Puerto Rican, & Jordanian Populations

    After studying Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:

    A. Of which biological variations among Korean Americans should the nurse be
    aware?

    B. Describe how stereotyping Puerto Ricans as similar to other Hispanic Americans
    can lead the nurse to errors in patient care.

    C. Describe the geographical location of Jordan, and indicate how this region of
    the world and the political turmoil experienced by Jordanians may have a
    profound political impact on the health and well-being of recently immigrated
    Jordanian Americans.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years)
    scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within
    your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA
    style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43801/pages/module-6-lecture-materials-and-resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43801/pages/module-6-lecture-materials-and-resources)

    **## NUR505assignwk6.pdf**

    Pamphlet Presentation & Peer
    Review

    Haitian Community
    Part I: Create a visually appealing and informative educational pamphlet and submit it

    • Include information on:

    ◦ healthcare beliefs,

    ◦ health practices,

    ◦ communication styles,

    ◦ family dynamics; and

    ◦ any specific health disparities.

    • Include practical tips, strategies, or scenarios that illustrate culturally competent
    care within the pamphlet.

    ◦ Provide examples of how your colleagues can integrate this knowledge

    into their practice.

    • Incorporate images, infographics, and culturally relevant visuals to enhance the

    content.

    Part II: Conduct a peer review of two peers, providing respectful and constructive
    criticism to help improve their pamphlets.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The pamphlet should be concise, clear, and easy to understand. Students will
    lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five
    years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    within your work.

    • Students will receive full credit once they have submitted their pamphlet
    and responded to two other students.

    • Attention: Complete and submit the assignment.

    • Each student must respond to two peers' posts.  providing respectful and

    constructive criticism to help your fellow students improve their pamphlets.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Peer Review Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Peer Reviews

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    0 pts

    /3 pts

    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations

    and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    2 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    1.5 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to

    detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of

    citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

    0 pts

    **## NUR505assignwk6.pdf**

    Pamphlet Presentation & Peer
    Review

    Haitian Community
    Part I: Create a visually appealing and informative educational pamphlet and submit it

    • Include information on:

    ◦ healthcare beliefs,

    ◦ health practices,

    ◦ communication styles,

    ◦ family dynamics; and

    ◦ any specific health disparities.

    • Include practical tips, strategies, or scenarios that illustrate culturally competent
    care within the pamphlet.

    ◦ Provide examples of how your colleagues can integrate this knowledge

    into their practice.

    • Incorporate images, infographics, and culturally relevant visuals to enhance the

    content.

    Part II: Conduct a peer review of two peers, providing respectful and constructive
    criticism to help improve their pamphlets.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The pamphlet should be concise, clear, and easy to understand. Students will
    lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five
    years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    within your work.

    • Students will receive full credit once they have submitted their pamphlet
    and responded to two other students.

    • Attention: Complete and submit the assignment.

    • Each student must respond to two peers' posts.  providing respectful and

    constructive criticism to help your fellow students improve their pamphlets.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Peer Review Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Peer Reviews

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    0 pts

    /3 pts

    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations

    and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    2 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    1.5 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to

    detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of

    citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

    0 pts

    **## NUR505530wk6dis.pdf**

    Module 6 Discussion

    Case Study: C.Z.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Purpose: Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental
    health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying
    evidence-based research.

    Scenario: C.Z. is a 20-year-old Caucasian male who is in his second year of college.
    He is seeking treatment due to persistent fears that campus security and
    the local police are tracking and surveilling him. He cites occasional lags in
    his internet speed as evidence that surveillance devices are interfering with
    his electronics. His intense anxiety about this has begun getting in the way
    of his ability to complete schoolwork, and his friends are concerned – he
    says they have told him, “you’re not making sense.”

    C.Z. occasionally laughs abruptly and inappropriately and sometimes stops
    speaking mid-sentence, looking off in the distance as though he sees or
    hears something. He expresses concern about electronics in the room
    (phone, computer) potentially being monitored and asks repeatedly about
    patient confidentiality, stating that he wants to be sure the police won’t be
    informed about his treatment. His beliefs are fixed, and if they are
    challenged, his tone becomes hostile.

    Question
    s:

    Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and NP
    guidelines. At all times, explain your answers.

    1. Discuss the etiology, course, and the structural/functional
    abnormalities of schizophrenia.

    2. Discuss the evidence-based pharmacological and
    nonpharmacological treatment for this patient using the US Clinical
    Guidelines.

    Module 6 Discussion

    Caring for Korean, Puerto Rican, & Jordanian Populations

    After studying Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:

    A. Of which biological variations among Korean Americans should the nurse be
    aware?

    B. Describe how stereotyping Puerto Ricans as similar to other Hispanic Americans
    can lead the nurse to errors in patient care.

    C. Describe the geographical location of Jordan, and indicate how this region of
    the world and the political turmoil experienced by Jordanians may have a
    profound political impact on the health and well-being of recently immigrated
    Jordanian Americans.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years)
    scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within
    your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA
    style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43801/pages/module-6-lecture-materials-and-resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43801/pages/module-6-lecture-materials-and-resources)

    **## NUR505assignwk6.pdf**

    Pamphlet Presentation & Peer
    Review

    Haitian Community
    Part I: Create a visually appealing and informative educational pamphlet and submit it

    • Include information on:

    ◦ healthcare beliefs,

    ◦ health practices,

    ◦ communication styles,

    ◦ family dynamics; and

    ◦ any specific health disparities.

    • Include practical tips, strategies, or scenarios that illustrate culturally competent
    care within the pamphlet.

    ◦ Provide examples of how your colleagues can integrate this knowledge

    into their practice.

    • Incorporate images, infographics, and culturally relevant visuals to enhance the

    content.

    Part II: Conduct a peer review of two peers, providing respectful and constructive
    criticism to help improve their pamphlets.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The pamphlet should be concise, clear, and easy to understand. Students will
    lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five
    years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    within your work.

    • Students will receive full credit once they have submitted their pamphlet
    and responded to two other students.

    • Attention: Complete and submit the assignment.

    • Each student must respond to two peers' posts.  providing respectful and

    constructive criticism to help your fellow students improve their pamphlets.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Peer Review Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Peer Reviews

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    0 pts

    /3 pts

    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations

    and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    2 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    1.5 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to

    detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of

    citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

    0 pts

    **## NUR505530wk6dis.pdf**

    Module 6 Discussion

    Case Study: C.Z.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Purpose: Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental
    health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying
    evidence-based research.

    Scenario: C.Z. is a 20-year-old Caucasian male who is in his second year of college.
    He is seeking treatment due to persistent fears that campus security and
    the local police are tracking and surveilling him. He cites occasional lags in
    his internet speed as evidence that surveillance devices are interfering with
    his electronics. His intense anxiety about this has begun getting in the way
    of his ability to complete schoolwork, and his friends are concerned – he
    says they have told him, “you’re not making sense.”

    C.Z. occasionally laughs abruptly and inappropriately and sometimes stops
    speaking mid-sentence, looking off in the distance as though he sees or
    hears something. He expresses concern about electronics in the room
    (phone, computer) potentially being monitored and asks repeatedly about
    patient confidentiality, stating that he wants to be sure the police won’t be
    informed about his treatment. His beliefs are fixed, and if they are
    challenged, his tone becomes hostile.

    Question
    s:

    Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and NP
    guidelines. At all times, explain your answers.

    1. Discuss the etiology, course, and the structural/functional
    abnormalities of schizophrenia.

    2. Discuss the evidence-based pharmacological and
    nonpharmacological treatment for this patient using the US Clinical
    Guidelines.

    Module 6 Discussion

    Caring for Korean, Puerto Rican, & Jordanian Populations

    After studying Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:

    A. Of which biological variations among Korean Americans should the nurse be
    aware?

    B. Describe how stereotyping Puerto Ricans as similar to other Hispanic Americans
    can lead the nurse to errors in patient care.

    C. Describe the geographical location of Jordan, and indicate how this region of
    the world and the political turmoil experienced by Jordanians may have a
    profound political impact on the health and well-being of recently immigrated
    Jordanian Americans.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years)
    scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within
    your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA
    style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43801/pages/module-6-lecture-materials-and-resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43801/pages/module-6-lecture-materials-and-resources)

    **## NUR505assignwk6.pdf**

    Pamphlet Presentation & Peer
    Review

    Haitian Community
    Part I: Create a visually appealing and informative educational pamphlet and submit it

    • Include information on:

    ◦ healthcare beliefs,

    ◦ health practices,

    ◦ communication styles,

    ◦ family dynamics; and

    ◦ any specific health disparities.

    • Include practical tips, strategies, or scenarios that illustrate culturally competent
    care within the pamphlet.

    ◦ Provide examples of how your colleagues can integrate this knowledge

    into their practice.

    • Incorporate images, infographics, and culturally relevant visuals to enhance the

    content.

    Part II: Conduct a peer review of two peers, providing respectful and constructive
    criticism to help improve their pamphlets.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The pamphlet should be concise, clear, and easy to understand. Students will
    lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five
    years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    within your work.

    • Students will receive full credit once they have submitted their pamphlet
    and responded to two other students.

    • Attention: Complete and submit the assignment.

    • Each student must respond to two peers' posts.  providing respectful and

    constructive criticism to help your fellow students improve their pamphlets.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Peer Review Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Peer Reviews

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and

    concepts.

    0 pts

    /3 pts

    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations

    and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    2 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

    1.5 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations

    and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to

    detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of

    citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

    0 pts

  • [Solved] practical nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering practical nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 460Topic 1 DQ 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    To complete this DQ, familiarize yourself with the "Case Study: John Doe – Emergency Department" assignment and document. Which members of the interdisciplinary team are utilized upon the patient's arrival to the ED? Discuss the responsibilities of each team member at this stage in the patient's car…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    To complete this DQ, familiarize yourself with the "Case Study: John Doe – Emergency Department" assignment and document. Which members of the interdisciplinary team are utilized upon the patient's arrival to the ED? Discuss the responsibilities of each team member at this stage in the patient's care. Once the patient is stabilized in the ED, what discharge planning would be initiated even though the patient will not be discharged yet?

    Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to "RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric" and "RN-BSN Participation Rubric," located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 460John Doe – Emergency Department

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Use the "Case Study: John Doe – Emergency Department" template to complete the assignment. This case study has indirect care experience requirements. The "NRS-460 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours" form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experien…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Use the "Case Study: John Doe – Emergency Department" template to complete the assignment.

    This case study has indirect care experience requirements. The "NRS-460 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours" form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5.

    You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] focus note

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## GIcase.docx **## GIcase.docx** | | | — | | **Subjective:** | **Patient ID** is a 6 wk.o. male infant who is here for | | | | — | — | | | | | **Chief Complaint** | | Patient presents with | | • | Gastrophageal Reflux | **ANY SEPARATE IDENTIFIABLE PROBLEMS:** Vom…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## GIcase.docx

    **## GIcase.docx**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Subjective:** |

    **Patient ID** is a 6 wk.o. male infant who is here for

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |
    | **Chief Complaint** |
    | Patient presents with |
    | • | Gastrophageal Reflux |

    **ANY SEPARATE IDENTIFIABLE PROBLEMS:**

    Vomiting after feeding, fussiness

    **History of Present Illness:**

    Mom says child has been having spit up and vomiting after almost each feed.

    Timing of vomiting/spit ups: no

    Weight changes: no

    Aggravating factors: None

    Relieving factors: None

    Associated symptoms: see above

    **Child has special health care needs:**

    None

    **Review of Systems:**

    HEENT: neg

    Respiratory: neg

    Cardiovascular: Negative.

    Genitourinary: Negative.

    GI: see above.

    Musculoskeletal: Negative.

    Skin: neg

    Neurological: Negative.

    Endo/Heme/Allergies: Negative.

    Psychiatric/Behavioral: Negative.

    **Allergies:**

    Reviewed

    **Family History:**

    Reviewed

    **Psychosocial:**

    Reviewed

    **Passive Smoking:**

    None

    | |
    | — |
    | **Objective:** |

    **Physical Exam ( Pertinent findings related to problems are in bold):**

    Temp 98.4 °F (36.9 °C) (Temporal) | Wt 11 lb 4.5 oz (5.117 kg)

    GENERAL: Appears well-developed.

    HEAD: AFOF soft & flat, normocephalic

    EYES: Conjunctivae and EOM are normal. Pupils are equal and reactive to light

    EARS: Normal

    NOSE: Normal

    Mouth/Throat:
    **Mucous membranes are moist, no thrush, no blisters**

    Neck: Normal range of motion, supple.

    CV: regular rate & rhythm, S1 and S2 normal, Pulses palpable, perfusion normal.

    RESP: Effort normal & breath sounds normal, air entry clear/= bilaterally

    ABD:
    **Soft, Bowel sounds are normal, No masses**
    GU: normal male genitalia
    MS: Normal range of motion. Joints are normal.

    SKIN: Normal.
    NEURO: Active and alert; good tone and normal reflexes.

    | |
    | — |
    | **Assessment and Plan:** |

    **Assessment:** child is an 6 wk.o. male infant

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **1.** | **Gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis** | **famotidine (PEPCID) 40 mg/5 mL (8 mg/mL) suspension** |
    | |

    **PROBLEM ORIENTED PLAN:**

    **GERD:**

    – Famotidine PO once a day

    – Small feeds and good burping

    – Keep head side about 20-30 degree up

    – Call back if symptoms do not improve or get worse

    Parents were given education and teaching about GERD and feeding issues.

    Parents verbalized good understanding about condition and plan of care.

    **Follow up/next visit:** As scheduled and PRN

    **## GIcase.docx**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Subjective:** |

    **Patient ID** is a 6 wk.o. male infant who is here for

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | | |
    | **Chief Complaint** |
    | Patient presents with |
    | • | Gastrophageal Reflux |

    **ANY SEPARATE IDENTIFIABLE PROBLEMS:**

    Vomiting after feeding, fussiness

    **History of Present Illness:**

    Mom says child has been having spit up and vomiting after almost each feed.

    Timing of vomiting/spit ups: no

    Weight changes: no

    Aggravating factors: None

    Relieving factors: None

    Associated symptoms: see above

    **Child has special health care needs:**

    None

    **Review of Systems:**

    HEENT: neg

    Respiratory: neg

    Cardiovascular: Negative.

    Genitourinary: Negative.

    GI: see above.

    Musculoskeletal: Negative.

    Skin: neg

    Neurological: Negative.

    Endo/Heme/Allergies: Negative.

    Psychiatric/Behavioral: Negative.

    **Allergies:**

    Reviewed

    **Family History:**

    Reviewed

    **Psychosocial:**

    Reviewed

    **Passive Smoking:**

    None

    | |
    | — |
    | **Objective:** |

    **Physical Exam ( Pertinent findings related to problems are in bold):**

    Temp 98.4 °F (36.9 °C) (Temporal) | Wt 11 lb 4.5 oz (5.117 kg)

    GENERAL: Appears well-developed.

    HEAD: AFOF soft & flat, normocephalic

    EYES: Conjunctivae and EOM are normal. Pupils are equal and reactive to light

    EARS: Normal

    NOSE: Normal

    Mouth/Throat:
    **Mucous membranes are moist, no thrush, no blisters**

    Neck: Normal range of motion, supple.

    CV: regular rate & rhythm, S1 and S2 normal, Pulses palpable, perfusion normal.

    RESP: Effort normal & breath sounds normal, air entry clear/= bilaterally

    ABD:
    **Soft, Bowel sounds are normal, No masses**
    GU: normal male genitalia
    MS: Normal range of motion. Joints are normal.

    SKIN: Normal.
    NEURO: Active and alert; good tone and normal reflexes.

    | |
    | — |
    | **Assessment and Plan:** |

    **Assessment:** child is an 6 wk.o. male infant

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **1.** | **Gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis** | **famotidine (PEPCID) 40 mg/5 mL (8 mg/mL) suspension** |
    | |

    **PROBLEM ORIENTED PLAN:**

    **GERD:**

    – Famotidine PO once a day

    – Small feeds and good burping

    – Keep head side about 20-30 degree up

    – Call back if symptoms do not improve or get worse

    Parents were given education and teaching about GERD and feeding issues.

    Parents verbalized good understanding about condition and plan of care.

    **Follow up/next visit:** As scheduled and PRN