My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] RESPOND- CONTEXTUAL FACTORS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    RESPOND TO THE 2 ATTACHED **Read** a selection of your classmates’ posts and **respond** to **at least two** of your classmates on **two different days** by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your classmate or sharing additional perspectives on the analysis of contextual factors desc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    RESPOND TO THE 2 ATTACHED
    **Read** a selection of your classmates’ posts and **respond** to **at least two** of your classmates on **two different days** by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your classmate or sharing additional perspectives on the analysis of contextual factors described by your classmate.
    **Note:** Your responses to classmates should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA Style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful response, but cannot stand alone as a response. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or offering a fresh viewpoint, and be constructive, thereby enhancing the learning experience for all students.
    \
    VictorNFombo.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/victornfombo-docx "VictorNFombo.docx")
    \
    IsaJuniorKhalid.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/isajuniorkhalid-docx "IsaJuniorKhalid.docx")

  • [Solved] POLICY MODEL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **POLICY MODEL** PLEASE USE THE RUBRICS BELLOW Read the attached ![](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/Pixabay_law-firm-4924547_1920.jpg) – ## wk4assign-policy.docx – ## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx – ## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx **## wk4assign-policy.docx…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **POLICY MODEL**
    PLEASE USE THE RUBRICS BELLOW
    Read the attached
    ![](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/Pixabay_law-firm-4924547_1920.jpg)

    – ## wk4assign-policy.docx

    – ## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx

    – ## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx

    **## wk4assign-policy.docx**

    _he following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S._

    _Please select at least two from the following to view._

    · CNBC. (2018, December 26).
    [_Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensive_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

    · FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18).
    [_The healthcare divide_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [_(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.

    · IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6).
    [_The U.S. health care system is terminally broken_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg%20) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.

    · PBS NewsHour. (2021).
    [_Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA) _._ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.

    **## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx**

    POLICY MODEL

    Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.

    For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196706/modules/items/8309443)

    TO PREPARE

    · Review the twelve policy models outlined in
    _Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals_(Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)

    · Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.

    · You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.

    THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)

    **Submit** a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.

    In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.

    Support your response with evidence.

    **Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    **## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**

    **NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**

    **NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## wk4assign-policy.docx**

    _he following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S._

    _Please select at least two from the following to view._

    · CNBC. (2018, December 26).
    [_Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensive_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

    · FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18).
    [_The healthcare divide_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [_(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.

    · IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6).
    [_The U.S. health care system is terminally broken_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg%20) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.

    · PBS NewsHour. (2021).
    [_Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA) _._ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.

    **## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx**

    POLICY MODEL

    Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.

    For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196706/modules/items/8309443)

    TO PREPARE

    · Review the twelve policy models outlined in
    _Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals_(Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)

    · Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.

    · You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.

    THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)

    **Submit** a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.

    In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.

    Support your response with evidence.

    **Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    **## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**

    **NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## wk4assign-policy.docx**

    _he following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S._

    _Please select at least two from the following to view._

    · CNBC. (2018, December 26).
    [_Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensive_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

    · FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18).
    [_The healthcare divide_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [_(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.

    · IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6).
    [_The U.S. health care system is terminally broken_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg%20) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.

    · PBS NewsHour. (2021).
    [_Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA) _._ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.

    **## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx**

    POLICY MODEL

    Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.

    For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196706/modules/items/8309443)

    TO PREPARE

    · Review the twelve policy models outlined in
    _Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals_(Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)

    · Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.

    · You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.

    THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)

    **Submit** a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.

    In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.

    Support your response with evidence.

    **Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    **## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**

    **NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Response BLOG: OBSERVATION OF EBP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Respond to the 2 attached APA STYLE NOTHING LESS THAN 250 WORD EACH **Respond** to at least **two** of your colleagues, on different days, by comparing their observations and evaluations of evidence-based practice (EBP) with your own and offering suggestions or recommendations to advance EBP in one …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Respond to the 2 attached
    APA STYLE
    NOTHING LESS THAN 250 WORD EACH
    **Respond** to at least **two** of your colleagues, on different days, by comparing their observations and evaluations of evidence-based practice (EBP) with your own and offering suggestions or recommendations to advance EBP in one or both settings.
    **Note:** Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.
    **Return** to this Blog to read the responses to your initial entry. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.
    \
    GladysFrancistheblog.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gladysfrancistheblog-docx "GladysFrancistheblog.docx")
    \
    KeniaJazminMurillotheblog.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/keniajazminmurillotheblog-docx "KeniaJazminMurillotheblog.docx")

  • [Solved] Week 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Nurses are faced with situations where legal and ethical considerations are complex and sometimes don’t have a simple or clear solution. Unfortunately, nurses are frequently held accountable in these complex situations, which is why it is important for nurses to understand what they can and can’t do…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Nurses are faced with situations where legal and ethical considerations are complex and sometimes don’t have a simple or clear solution. Unfortunately, nurses are frequently held accountable in these complex situations, which is why it is important for nurses to understand what they can and can’t do, what they will be accountable for, and what they are responsible for. In this assessment, you will analyze a complex topic from an ethical and legal perspective. You should also analyze its impact on nurses and accountability.
    **The topic is as follows:**
    – Euthanasia and assisted suicide
    **Research** your selected topic.
    **Analyze** a nurse’s legal responsibilities related to your selected topic.
    **Analyze** a nurse’s ethical responsibilities related to your selected topic.
    **Take** a position on the topic and **explain** your position in detail.
    **Summarize** the steps in the ethical decision-making model you employed and the process used to arrive at your position.
    **Discuss** how your position affects nurses and how nurses can be held accountable in situations related to your selected topic.
    **Cite** at least 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years to support your position(s).
    **Include** an APA-formatted reference list.

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Read** a selection of your classmates’ responses and **respond** to **at least two** of your classmates on **two different days.** Expand upon your classmate’s posting or offer an alternative perspective. **Note:** Your responses to classmates should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Read** a selection of your classmates’ responses and **respond** to **at least two** of your classmates on **two different days.** Expand upon your classmate’s posting or offer an alternative perspective.
    **Note:** Your responses to classmates should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA Style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful response, but cannot stand alone as a response. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or offering a fresh viewpoint, and be constructive, thereby enhancing the learning experience for all students.

  • [Solved] Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Adults With Mood Disorders

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/199680/files/16528039/download?download_frd=1 – CrashCourse. (2014, September 8). [_Depressive and bipolar disorders: Crash course psychology #30_Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwMlHkWKDwM&t=1s) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.b…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/199680/files/16528039/download?download_frd=1
    – CrashCourse. (2014, September 8). [_Depressive and bipolar disorders: Crash course psychology #30_Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwMlHkWKDwM&t=1s) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/ZwMlHkWKDwM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwMlHkWKDwM&t=1sLinks to an external site.
    – Walden University. (2021). _Case study: Petunia Park_ . Walden University Blackboard. [https://waldenu.instructure.com](https://waldenu.instructure.com/)
    \
    AssessingDiagnosingandTreatingAdultsWithMoodDisorders.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessingdiagnosingandtreatingadultswithmooddisorders-docx-10471235 "AssessingDiagnosingandTreatingAdultsWithMoodDisorders.docx")
    \
    NRNP_PRAC_6665_6675_FocusedSOAP_Note_Exemplar_rev.4.2022.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrnp-prac-6665-6675-focusedsoap-note-exemplar-rev-4-2022-docx-10471237 "NRNP_PRAC_6665_6675_FocusedSOAP_Note_Exemplar_rev.4.2022.docx")
    \
    NRNPPRAC66656675FocusedSOAPNoteTemplate.doc](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nrnpprac66656675focusedsoapnotetemplate-doc-10471239 "NRNPPRAC66656675FocusedSOAPNoteTemplate.doc")

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Analyze informatics frameworks and models that are applicable to healthcare organizations and nursing practice. What are the key principles and best practices that you can leverage from these frameworks to support your practice?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Analyze informatics frameworks and models that are applicable to healthcare organizations and nursing practice. What are the key principles and best practices that you can leverage from these frameworks to support your practice?

  • [Solved] Powerpoint

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## PICOTFinalProject.docx **## PICOTFinalProject.docx** | | | | | — | — | — | | | **Assessment Name: PICOT Summative Assessment** | | **Scaffolding: Developing** | | **Objectives:**<br>Define the PICOT format and explain its role in formulating an evidence-based clinical question.<br>Identif…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## PICOTFinalProject.docx

    **## PICOTFinalProject.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | **Assessment Name: PICOT Summative Assessment** |
    | **Scaffolding: Developing** |
    | **Objectives:**<br>Define the PICOT format and explain its role in formulating an evidence-based clinical question.<br>Identify a nursing-relevant clinical issue and frame it in PICOT format.<br>Differentiate between qualitative and quantitative research designs and identify their corresponding levels of evidence.<br>Summarize the purpose, findings, and conclusions of selected evidence-based research studies.<br>Explain how synthesis of research findings informs nursing decision-making and practice improvement.<br>Describe how Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model can be applied to translate research into nursing practice change. |
    | **Instructional Materials Associated with Assessment:** Assigned Readings, PICOT Article analysis 1 and 2, PowerPoint assignments, Kotter’s Change Model PowerPoint assignment. All suggested edits by instructor should be incorporated into the final presentation. |
    | **Assessment Description** | This assignment provides RN to BSN students with the opportunity to explore evidence-based practice (EBP) by developing a PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timeframe) clinical question. Students will select a nursing-relevant clinical problem, frame it using the PICOT format, and identify recent (within the last 7 years) peer-reviewed research evidence that addresses the question. Students will synthesize findings from qualitative and/or quantitative studies, assess levels of evidence, and propose recommendations for nursing practice.<br>This assignment builds foundational skills in evidence appraisal, critical thinking, and professional communication. By using Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, students will also begin to connect evidence-based findings to change processes that impact clinical practice and patient outcomes. |
    | **Competencies Assessed (as applicable)** | AACN Essentials | 1.1a, 1.2c, 2.1b, 4.1b, 4.2c, 5.2a, 6.2f, 9.1b |
    | | AACN Concept/s | Evidence Based Practice, |
    | | Specialty Competencies | |
    | | Benedictine Values | Respect for Persons, Community, Service, Prayer, Hospitality, Moderation |
    | | University Competencies | |
    | | Program Outcomes | 1,2,4,5,6,9 |
    | | Course Outcomes | 1,2,3,4,56,7 |
    | **Assignment Guidelines and instructions** | You will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation that demonstrates your ability to search, evaluate, and synthesize nursing research related to your PICOT question. This presentation may be completed individually or in a group of two students (maximum).<br>Individual: Minimum of 4 peer-reviewed nursing research studies (qualitative or quantitative).<br>Group of 2: Minimum of 6 peer-reviewed nursing research studies (qualitative or quantitative).<br>**Note:** Meta Analysis or Systematic reviews are not allowed as part of your core 4–6 studies, though you may cite them as supporting sources elsewhere.<br> <br>Your presentation must include:<br>1. PICOT Question – clearly state your PICOT in correct format, with link to a nursing practice issue.<br>My question – In hospitalized patients (P), does hourly rounding (I), when compared to no structured rounding (C), reduce the incidence of patient falls (O) during hospitalization (T)?<br>2. History & Background – provide an overview of the background and history of the problem.<br>3. Clinical Significance – explain why this issue matters to patient outcomes and nursing practice.<br>4. Research Evidence – summarize purpose, design/level of evidence, findings, and conclusions for each required study.<br>5. Synthesis of Findings – highlight commonalities, differences, and overall strength of the evidence.<br>6. Recommendations – provide evidence-based recommendations for nursing practice.<br>7. Kotter’s Change Model – apply all 8 steps to your proposed practice change.<br>8. Conclusion – summarize key points and implications for nursing practice.<br>9. Professionalism & APA – presentation must follow APA 7th edition and be free of errors.<br>**Format: 15–20 minutes maximum,** with clear slide headings aligned with rubric criteria. Use speaker notes for additional explanation. |

    **Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | Developed | Developing | Not Met |
    | Title Slide | Presentation title, student name(s) and date | Required criteria missing | Slide is not provided |
    | PICOT Topic and Clinical Question | Clearly articulated in correct PICOT format; Clinical question is directly linked to a relevant nursing practice issue. | PICOT provided but with errors in format or only loosely linked to practice. Clinical question is not relevant to nursing practice. Missing either the PICOT topic or Clinical Question. | No PICOT or Clinical question |
    | History & Background of the Issue | Provides a thorough overview of the background and history of the problem; demonstrates clear understanding of why the issue is important to nursing. | Provides partial history or background, but lacks depth or clarity in connecting to nursing practice. | No history provided, or background is unclear/inaccurate. |
    | Clinical Significance | Clearly describes the significance of the issue to patient outcomes, nursing practice, or healthcare systems; demonstrates strong relevance. | Mentions clinical significance but lacks detail, depth, or connection to patient outcomes or nursing practice. | No clinical significance described, or connection is unclear. |
    | Research Evidence | Includes study design, level of evidence, purpose of study, sample description, findings and data, conclusions and implications for practice for each article review. Required number of articles critiqued (4 for single presentation, 6 for group of 2). | Fewer than required studies OR incomplete summaries OR errors in identifying type or level of evidence. | No valid sources provided OR content missing from 3 more articles. |
    | Synthesis of Findings | Provides a collective summary that integrates themes, similarities, and differences across studies; demonstrates comprehension of overall evidence base. | Some synthesis provided but superficial, partial, or limited connections across studies. | No synthesis; only article-by-article reporting. |
    | Recommendations for Nursing Practice | Provides clear, evidence-based recommendations that are logical, practical, and directly supported by findings. | Recommendations are vague, weakly supported, or only partially connected to findings. | No recommendations, or recommendations unrelated to evidence. |
    | Application of Kotter’s Change Model | Accurately applies all 8 steps of Kotter’s Change Model to the proposed practice change; logical and thorough. | Some steps addressed but application is vague, incomplete, or superficial. | No application of Kotter’s model, or unrelated to assignment. |
    | Conclusion | Strong conclusion summarizing major points, reinforcing significance, and clearly identifying implications for practice. | General conclusion with limited clarity or connection to practice. | No clear conclusion provided. |
    | Professionalism & APA | Clear, professional presentation; free of grammar/spelling errors; APA citations and references correct. | Minor errors in grammar/APA that do not impede clarity. | Multiple errors in grammar/APA that detract from professionalism or clarity. |

    **AACN Essentials Alignment table**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Domain / Sub-Competency | Application in PICOT Assignment |
    | Domain 1: Knowledge for Nursing Practice (1.1a, 1.2c) | Students apply nursing knowledge to frame clinical questions and interpret diverse evidence to inform practice. |
    | Domain 2: Person-Centered Care (2.1b) | Students incorporate patient values and preferences when identifying clinical issues for the PICOT question. |
    | Domain 4: Scholarship for Nursing Discipline (4.1b, 4.2c) | Students analyze research studies for quality and synthesize findings to guide nursing decisions. |
    | Domain 5: Quality and Safety (5.2a) | Evidence-based findings are applied to improve quality and safety in clinical settings. |
    | Domain 6: Interprofessional Partnerships (6.2f) | Communication and collaboration are emphasized when considering implementation of practice change. |
    | Domain 9: Professionalism (9.1b) | Students reflect on professional practice by proposing strategies for improvement informed by evidence. |

    Assignment Alignment with Benedictine Values and Course Outcome

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Benedictine Value | Application in PICOT Assignment |
    | Respect for Persons | PICOT requires consideration of ethical, cultural, and patient-centered aspects of care. |
    | Community | Assignment emphasizes collaboration, shared evidence, and connection to community resources. |
    | Service | Recommendations for clinical practice reflect commitment to service for patients and communities. |
    | Prayer/Reflection | Students are encouraged to reflect on the process of evidence integration and professional growth. |
    | Hospitality | PICOT framing fosters inclusivity and open inquiry in evidence-based discussions. |
    | Moderation | Balanced and thoughtful evaluation of research ensures evidence is applied responsibly. |

    #### | | | | — | — | | Course Outcome | Application in PICOT Assignment | | 1. Create healing environments | PICOT framing incorporates patient experience and promotes respectful, healing environments. | | 2. Provide safe, quality, cost-effective care | Evaluation of evidence-based research supports safe and effective nursing care. | | 3. Collaborate with patients, families, and communities | PICOT questions are contextualized with diverse populations and interprofessional collaboration. | | 4. Integrate informatics and communication systems | Students use databases and research tools to retrieve and communicate evidence. | | 5. Engage in lifelong learning | Students develop habits of evidence review and integration into practice decisions. | | 6. Integrate professional standards, ethics, and Benedictine values | Kotter’s Change Model and EBP application align with professionalism and nursing ethics. | | 7. Evaluate QSEN competencies | Application of EBP findings demonstrates understanding of quality improvement and safety. |

    **## PICOTFinalProject.docx**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | **Assessment Name: PICOT Summative Assessment** |
    | **Scaffolding: Developing** |
    | **Objectives:**<br>Define the PICOT format and explain its role in formulating an evidence-based clinical question.<br>Identify a nursing-relevant clinical issue and frame it in PICOT format.<br>Differentiate between qualitative and quantitative research designs and identify their corresponding levels of evidence.<br>Summarize the purpose, findings, and conclusions of selected evidence-based research studies.<br>Explain how synthesis of research findings informs nursing decision-making and practice improvement.<br>Describe how Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model can be applied to translate research into nursing practice change. |
    | **Instructional Materials Associated with Assessment:** Assigned Readings, PICOT Article analysis 1 and 2, PowerPoint assignments, Kotter’s Change Model PowerPoint assignment. All suggested edits by instructor should be incorporated into the final presentation. |
    | **Assessment Description** | This assignment provides RN to BSN students with the opportunity to explore evidence-based practice (EBP) by developing a PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timeframe) clinical question. Students will select a nursing-relevant clinical problem, frame it using the PICOT format, and identify recent (within the last 7 years) peer-reviewed research evidence that addresses the question. Students will synthesize findings from qualitative and/or quantitative studies, assess levels of evidence, and propose recommendations for nursing practice.<br>This assignment builds foundational skills in evidence appraisal, critical thinking, and professional communication. By using Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, students will also begin to connect evidence-based findings to change processes that impact clinical practice and patient outcomes. |
    | **Competencies Assessed (as applicable)** | AACN Essentials | 1.1a, 1.2c, 2.1b, 4.1b, 4.2c, 5.2a, 6.2f, 9.1b |
    | | AACN Concept/s | Evidence Based Practice, |
    | | Specialty Competencies | |
    | | Benedictine Values | Respect for Persons, Community, Service, Prayer, Hospitality, Moderation |
    | | University Competencies | |
    | | Program Outcomes | 1,2,4,5,6,9 |
    | | Course Outcomes | 1,2,3,4,56,7 |
    | **Assignment Guidelines and instructions** | You will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation that demonstrates your ability to search, evaluate, and synthesize nursing research related to your PICOT question. This presentation may be completed individually or in a group of two students (maximum).<br>Individual: Minimum of 4 peer-reviewed nursing research studies (qualitative or quantitative).<br>Group of 2: Minimum of 6 peer-reviewed nursing research studies (qualitative or quantitative).<br>**Note:** Meta Analysis or Systematic reviews are not allowed as part of your core 4–6 studies, though you may cite them as supporting sources elsewhere.<br> <br>Your presentation must include:<br>1. PICOT Question – clearly state your PICOT in correct format, with link to a nursing practice issue.<br>My question – In hospitalized patients (P), does hourly rounding (I), when compared to no structured rounding (C), reduce the incidence of patient falls (O) during hospitalization (T)?<br>2. History & Background – provide an overview of the background and history of the problem.<br>3. Clinical Significance – explain why this issue matters to patient outcomes and nursing practice.<br>4. Research Evidence – summarize purpose, design/level of evidence, findings, and conclusions for each required study.<br>5. Synthesis of Findings – highlight commonalities, differences, and overall strength of the evidence.<br>6. Recommendations – provide evidence-based recommendations for nursing practice.<br>7. Kotter’s Change Model – apply all 8 steps to your proposed practice change.<br>8. Conclusion – summarize key points and implications for nursing practice.<br>9. Professionalism & APA – presentation must follow APA 7th edition and be free of errors.<br>**Format: 15–20 minutes maximum,** with clear slide headings aligned with rubric criteria. Use speaker notes for additional explanation. |

    **Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | Developed | Developing | Not Met |
    | Title Slide | Presentation title, student name(s) and date | Required criteria missing | Slide is not provided |
    | PICOT Topic and Clinical Question | Clearly articulated in correct PICOT format; Clinical question is directly linked to a relevant nursing practice issue. | PICOT provided but with errors in format or only loosely linked to practice. Clinical question is not relevant to nursing practice. Missing either the PICOT topic or Clinical Question. | No PICOT or Clinical question |
    | History & Background of the Issue | Provides a thorough overview of the background and history of the problem; demonstrates clear understanding of why the issue is important to nursing. | Provides partial history or background, but lacks depth or clarity in connecting to nursing practice. | No history provided, or background is unclear/inaccurate. |
    | Clinical Significance | Clearly describes the significance of the issue to patient outcomes, nursing practice, or healthcare systems; demonstrates strong relevance. | Mentions clinical significance but lacks detail, depth, or connection to patient outcomes or nursing practice. | No clinical significance described, or connection is unclear. |
    | Research Evidence | Includes study design, level of evidence, purpose of study, sample description, findings and data, conclusions and implications for practice for each article review. Required number of articles critiqued (4 for single presentation, 6 for group of 2). | Fewer than required studies OR incomplete summaries OR errors in identifying type or level of evidence. | No valid sources provided OR content missing from 3 more articles. |
    | Synthesis of Findings | Provides a collective summary that integrates themes, similarities, and differences across studies; demonstrates comprehension of overall evidence base. | Some synthesis provided but superficial, partial, or limited connections across studies. | No synthesis; only article-by-article reporting. |
    | Recommendations for Nursing Practice | Provides clear, evidence-based recommendations that are logical, practical, and directly supported by findings. | Recommendations are vague, weakly supported, or only partially connected to findings. | No recommendations, or recommendations unrelated to evidence. |
    | Application of Kotter’s Change Model | Accurately applies all 8 steps of Kotter’s Change Model to the proposed practice change; logical and thorough. | Some steps addressed but application is vague, incomplete, or superficial. | No application of Kotter’s model, or unrelated to assignment. |
    | Conclusion | Strong conclusion summarizing major points, reinforcing significance, and clearly identifying implications for practice. | General conclusion with limited clarity or connection to practice. | No clear conclusion provided. |
    | Professionalism & APA | Clear, professional presentation; free of grammar/spelling errors; APA citations and references correct. | Minor errors in grammar/APA that do not impede clarity. | Multiple errors in grammar/APA that detract from professionalism or clarity. |

    **AACN Essentials Alignment table**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Domain / Sub-Competency | Application in PICOT Assignment |
    | Domain 1: Knowledge for Nursing Practice (1.1a, 1.2c) | Students apply nursing knowledge to frame clinical questions and interpret diverse evidence to inform practice. |
    | Domain 2: Person-Centered Care (2.1b) | Students incorporate patient values and preferences when identifying clinical issues for the PICOT question. |
    | Domain 4: Scholarship for Nursing Discipline (4.1b, 4.2c) | Students analyze research studies for quality and synthesize findings to guide nursing decisions. |
    | Domain 5: Quality and Safety (5.2a) | Evidence-based findings are applied to improve quality and safety in clinical settings. |
    | Domain 6: Interprofessional Partnerships (6.2f) | Communication and collaboration are emphasized when considering implementation of practice change. |
    | Domain 9: Professionalism (9.1b) | Students reflect on professional practice by proposing strategies for improvement informed by evidence. |

    Assignment Alignment with Benedictine Values and Course Outcome

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Benedictine Value | Application in PICOT Assignment |
    | Respect for Persons | PICOT requires consideration of ethical, cultural, and patient-centered aspects of care. |
    | Community | Assignment emphasizes collaboration, shared evidence, and connection to community resources. |
    | Service | Recommendations for clinical practice reflect commitment to service for patients and communities. |
    | Prayer/Reflection | Students are encouraged to reflect on the process of evidence integration and professional growth. |
    | Hospitality | PICOT framing fosters inclusivity and open inquiry in evidence-based discussions. |
    | Moderation | Balanced and thoughtful evaluation of research ensures evidence is applied responsibly. |

    #### | | | | — | — | | Course Outcome | Application in PICOT Assignment | | 1. Create healing environments | PICOT framing incorporates patient experience and promotes respectful, healing environments. | | 2. Provide safe, quality, cost-effective care | Evaluation of evidence-based research supports safe and effective nursing care. | | 3. Collaborate with patients, families, and communities | PICOT questions are contextualized with diverse populations and interprofessional collaboration. | | 4. Integrate informatics and communication systems | Students use databases and research tools to retrieve and communicate evidence. | | 5. Engage in lifelong learning | Students develop habits of evidence review and integration into practice decisions. | | 6. Integrate professional standards, ethics, and Benedictine values | Kotter’s Change Model and EBP application align with professionalism and nursing ethics. | | 7. Evaluate QSEN competencies | Application of EBP findings demonstrates understanding of quality improvement and safety. |

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ##### **Part 1** The topic is Clinical uses for illicit substances (e.g., medical marijuana, MDMA for PTSD) **Respond** to the following in a 300-word paragraph: – Take a position on the topic and include evidence to support your position. **Explain** why you agree or disagree with the stance and **…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ##### **Part 1**
    The topic is Clinical uses for illicit substances (e.g., medical marijuana, MDMA for PTSD)
    **Respond** to the following in a 300-word paragraph:
    – Take a position on the topic and include evidence to support your position.
    **Explain** why you agree or disagree with the stance and **provide** citations or evidence to support it. Be constructive and professional in your responses.
    ##### **Part 2**
    **Summarize** the decision-making model you employed and the process used to arrive at your position.
    **Review** the following resource if you need additional information about ethical decision-making models:
    – “An Integrated Ethical Decision-Making Model for Nurses“
    **Cite** at least 3 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years that support your positions.
    **Include** an APA-formatted reference list.

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Review** "An Integrated Ethical-Decision-Making Model for Nurses" **Apply** the ethical decision-making model in the article to access the [Our Pregnant Daughter Didn't Want This…](https://www.practicalbioethics.org/resources/case-study-our-pregnant-daughter-didnt-want-this/) case study from the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Review** "An Integrated Ethical-Decision-Making Model for Nurses"
    **Apply** the ethical decision-making model in the article to access the [Our Pregnant Daughter Didn't Want This…](https://www.practicalbioethics.org/resources/case-study-our-pregnant-daughter-didnt-want-this/) case study from the Center for Practical Bioethics.
    **Review** the Questions for Discussion following the case.
    **Follow** the steps provided in the model, including the following:
    **Step 1:** Explain the ethical issues, other relevant ethical considerations, and ethical principles relevant to this case study and how they affect the nursing practice.
    **Step 2:** Collect and analyze additional information related to this case study, including researching and explaining any legal considerations.
    **Step 3:** Develop alternatives (different options) and compare them.
    **Step 4:** Determine your position and justify it:
    – What specific actions should be taken to ensure an appropriate outcome?
    – Why is your position important, needed, or beneficial for vulnerable populations?
    – Are the legal and ethical responsibilities in alignment with each other? If they are not in alignment, how does your position deal with that conflict?
    **Step 5:** Find strategies to implement the plan:
    – What ethical arguments could you use to persuade someone who disagrees with your position?
    **Cite** at least 3 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years.
    _Note_: At least 1 of the sources should provide evidence for your resolution recommendation or plan of action.
    **Include** an APA-formatted reference list.