Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (3)**
– ## Template11.docx
– ## EBP.docx
– ## JournalReviewRubric.docx
**## Template11.docx**
(
**Title**)
by:
Student Name
(Student ID)
Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing
(NRSE 500)
(Date)
## image1.png
**## EBP.docx**
_EBP – Research Article Review_
**Instructions**
Each student must select and review a
research article related to
**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)** in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).
1.
**Select** a Research Article focus on EBP
2.
**Provide** a concise
**summary** of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).
3.
**Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN**
·
**Explain** how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.
·
**Discuss** how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.
4.
**Format requirements:**
· Use the provided template as your cover page.
· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.
· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper
5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.
**Submission Instructions:**
· Submit your assignment by
**11:59 PM Eastern** on
**Sunday**.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
·
Your assignment will be run throughTurnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.
Template:
**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**
**Journal Review Rubric**
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |
**Total Points: ____/50**
**Comments:**
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
****Student Professor Date****
****©Prof. Emily Diaz****
****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****
**## image1.png**
**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**
**Journal Review Rubric**
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |
**Total Points: ____/50**
**Comments:**
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
****Student Professor Date****
****©Prof. Emily Diaz****
****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****
**## image1.png**
**## Template11.docx**
(
**Title**)
by:
Student Name
(Student ID)
Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing
(NRSE 500)
(Date)
## image1.png
**## EBP.docx**
_EBP – Research Article Review_
**Instructions**
Each student must select and review a
research article related to
**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)** in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).
1.
**Select** a Research Article focus on EBP
2.
**Provide** a concise
**summary** of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).
3.
**Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN**
·
**Explain** how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.
·
**Discuss** how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.
4.
**Format requirements:**
· Use the provided template as your cover page.
· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.
· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper
5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.
**Submission Instructions:**
· Submit your assignment by
**11:59 PM Eastern** on
**Sunday**.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
·
Your assignment will be run throughTurnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.
Template:
**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**
**Journal Review Rubric**
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |
**Total Points: ____/50**
**Comments:**
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
****Student Professor Date****
****©Prof. Emily Diaz****
****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****
**## image1.png**
**## Template11.docx**
(
**Title**)
by:
Student Name
(Student ID)
Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing
(NRSE 500)
(Date)
## image1.png
**## EBP.docx**
_EBP – Research Article Review_
**Instructions**
Each student must select and review a
research article related to
**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)** in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).
1.
**Select** a Research Article focus on EBP
2.
**Provide** a concise
**summary** of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).
3.
**Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN**
·
**Explain** how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.
·
**Discuss** how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.
4.
**Format requirements:**
· Use the provided template as your cover page.
· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.
· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper
5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.
**Submission Instructions:**
· Submit your assignment by
**11:59 PM Eastern** on
**Sunday**.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
·
Your assignment will be run throughTurnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.
Template:
**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**
**Journal Review Rubric**
| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |
**Total Points: ____/50**
**Comments:**
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
****Student Professor Date****
****©Prof. Emily Diaz****
****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****
**## image1.png**