[Solved] Asssigment

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– 2 years ago

**files (3)**

– ## Template11.docx

– ## EBP.docx

– ## JournalReviewRubric.docx

**## Template11.docx**


(
**Title**)

by:

Student Name

(Student ID)

Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing

(NRSE 500)

(Date)

## image1.png

**## EBP.docx**

_EBP – Research Article Review_

**Instructions**

Each student must select and review a
research article related to
**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)** in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).

1.
**Select** a Research Article focus on EBP

2.
**Provide** a concise
**summary** of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).

3.
**Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN**

·
**Explain** how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.

·
**Discuss** how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.

4.
**Format requirements:**

· Use the provided template as your cover page.

· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.

· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper

5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by
**11:59 PM Eastern** on
**Sunday**.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

·
Your assignment will be run throughTurnitin to check for plagiarism.  If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.

Template:

**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**


**Journal Review Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |

**Total Points: ____/50**

**Comments:**

| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |

****Student Professor Date****

****©Prof. Emily Diaz****

****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****

**## image1.png**

**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**


**Journal Review Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |

**Total Points: ____/50**

**Comments:**

| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |

****Student Professor Date****

****©Prof. Emily Diaz****

****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****

**## image1.png**

**## Template11.docx**


(
**Title**)

by:

Student Name

(Student ID)

Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing

(NRSE 500)

(Date)

## image1.png

**## EBP.docx**

_EBP – Research Article Review_

**Instructions**

Each student must select and review a
research article related to
**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)** in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).

1.
**Select** a Research Article focus on EBP

2.
**Provide** a concise
**summary** of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).

3.
**Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN**

·
**Explain** how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.

·
**Discuss** how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.

4.
**Format requirements:**

· Use the provided template as your cover page.

· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.

· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper

5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by
**11:59 PM Eastern** on
**Sunday**.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

·
Your assignment will be run throughTurnitin to check for plagiarism.  If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.

Template:

**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**


**Journal Review Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |

**Total Points: ____/50**

**Comments:**

| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |

****Student Professor Date****

****©Prof. Emily Diaz****

****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****

**## image1.png**

**## Template11.docx**


(
**Title**)

by:

Student Name

(Student ID)

Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing

(NRSE 500)

(Date)

## image1.png

**## EBP.docx**

_EBP – Research Article Review_

**Instructions**

Each student must select and review a
research article related to
**Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)** in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).

1.
**Select** a Research Article focus on EBP

2.
**Provide** a concise
**summary** of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).

3.
**Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN**

·
**Explain** how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.

·
**Discuss** how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.

4.
**Format requirements:**

· Use the provided template as your cover page.

· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.

· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper

5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Submit your assignment by
**11:59 PM Eastern** on
**Sunday**.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

·
Your assignment will be run throughTurnitin to check for plagiarism.  If you are new to Turnitin,
[review the information](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/using-turnitin) in the Student Resource Center about it.

Template:

**## JournalReviewRubric.docx**


**Journal Review Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Exemplary**<br>**(10 pts)** | **Proficient**<br>**(8-9 pts)** | **Developing**<br>**(6-7 pts)** | **Needs Improvement**<br>**(0-5 pts)** |
| **Summary of Content** | Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. | Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. | Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. | Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
| **Critical Analysis** | Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. | Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. | Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. | Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
| **Reflection** | Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. | Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. | Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. | Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
| **Organization & Clarity** | Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. | Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
| **APA Formatting** | Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. | Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. | APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. | Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |

**Total Points: ____/50**

**Comments:**

| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |

****Student Professor Date****

****©Prof. Emily Diaz****

****AGMU-2025 MS Nursing****

**## image1.png**