D5UE 4/24 5 PM EST As – a year ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →D5UE 4/24 5 PM EST
As
– a year ago
– a year ago **files (3)** – ## directionsforfinalpaper.docx – ## FEEDBACK.docx – ## TheDepartmentofEducation.docx **## directionsforfinalpaper.docx** Final Term Paper – Literature Review Paper – By the end of this course, all enrolled students will have to present a literature review paper relevant…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– a year ago
**files (3)**
– ## directionsforfinalpaper.docx
– ## FEEDBACK.docx
– ## TheDepartmentofEducation.docx
**## directionsforfinalpaper.docx**
Final Term Paper –
Literature Review Paper –
By the end of this course, all enrolled students will have to present a literature review paper relevant to industrial organizational psychology. Students will submit items indicating the progress on their paper throughout the term including a paper draft prior to final paper submission. Please consult the assignments schedule for the required submissions and their deadlines. Choose a topic relevant to industrial/organizational psychology and write a minimum of 5 – 10 double-spaced pages (not including cover and reference pages), using APA format with at least 10 references from peer reviewed journals. A list of available topics may be provided for consideration – but the list of key topics and selected bibliography articles listed in the syllabus should provide some ideas. Several APA guides, and samples are provided on Canvas along with a rubric for grading the assignment.
The paper must also use and cite 10 peer-reviewed articles appropriate for the topic. The reference section of the paper must cite all the articles used for its preparation. The 10 peer- reviewed articles are the minimum; that means students may use more than 10 articles for their paper. All papers must be written in accordance with APA guidelines, and should be careful not to plagiarize.
Papers will be assessed for plagiarism with Turnitin during the writing process. Thus, students must submit a copy of their proposal to the software in Canvas by the deadline stated below. (Section removed regarding
**Similarity Report** requirement for final submission. They key is that you have been made aware of possible similarities indicated by the Turnitin system and have made an effort to ensure proper credit has been provided to the originators of work, ideas, concepts, etc.). The paper must be submitted to the instructor no later than 11:59 PM on April 22nd . The paper will be graded primarily based upon the content of what is written, although issues of form, grammar and spelling will influence grading. YOU MAY NOT USE A PAPER FROM ANOTHER CLASS (PREVIOUS NOR CURRENT COURSE).
**## FEEDBACK.docx**
FEEDBACK:
**1. Clarity & Organization**
**Strengths:**
· The structure is logical and follows a clear progression: it introduces the topic, outlines the department’s functions, discusses the feasibility of dismantling it, explores the consequences, and addresses counterarguments.
· Each major function of the Department of Education is broken into digestible subsections with headings, aiding reader comprehension.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Introduction and thesis clarity:** The first paragraph could more clearly preview the structure of the paper and main argument. For example, the thesis could better state that the essay argues for
_maintaining_ the Department of Education based on its multiple critical functions.
·
**Redundant phrases:** Phrases like “This piece delves into…” and “This discourse points out…” could be more concise. Consider simply stating “This paper examines…” or directly launching into the argument.
·
**Transitions:** Some sections (e.g., from "Education Research and Policy Development" to "The Feasibility of Dismantling…") feel abrupt. Use transition sentences to guide the reader through shifts in focus.
**2. Content Development**
**Strengths:**
· The paper presents a strong, evidence-based case for the Department of Education's continued relevance, backed by current news and academic sources.
· Key programs (e.g., Pell Grants, Title I, IDEA) are well-explained with contemporary data and policy context.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Theoretical integration:** While the paper is rich in policy content, it could benefit from incorporating relevant
**I/O Psychology theories**—for example, educational equity as related to
_workforce development_,
_social mobility_, or
_organizational policy frameworks_. Linking the content back to I/O psych concepts would make it more suitable for the course.
·
**Depth of analysis:** The paper presents strong descriptions but could engage more critically with the material. For example, when discussing Pell Grants or IDEA, consider exploring
_why_ these federal efforts outperform state-level approaches.
·
**Balanced argumentation:** While it acknowledges counterarguments, the rebuttals could be more nuanced. It may help to cite a source that supports local control or critiques federal bureaucracy, then offer a more developed counter-response.
**3. Writing & APA Formatting**
**Strengths:**
· Generally strong grammar and vocabulary.
· APA formatting of references is on the right track and includes current sources.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Grammar/wording:** Some awkward or unclear phrasing:
· “The department was established with the aim of consolidating…” → “It was created to consolidate…”
· “Premium” in “those which are premium” is vague. Consider “higher-income students” or “those from affluent backgrounds.”
· Avoid hyperbole like “apocalyptic negative consequences.”
·
**APA formatting:**
· The title page should include a running head (if following APA 6) or centered title and page number only (APA 7).
· In-text citations need refinement. For example:
· “(Brasch et al., 2025)” is used several times, but page numbers are not included when quoting or referring to specific claims. If paraphrased, that’s okay, but make it clear.
· References should be double-spaced and have a hanging indent. URLs should not be followed by a period.
**4. Research Gaps & Critical Thinking**
**Strengths:**
· The paper raises an urgent and relevant policy debate with real-world implications.
· It shows thoughtful consideration of funding equity and legal complexity.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Missing perspectives:** Could benefit from integrating perspectives of teachers, administrators, or students (qualitative voices). Are there recent surveys or studies reflecting these stakeholders’ views?
·
**Future implications:** What does the debate suggest about the
_future of work_ or educational pathways into professional life—key I/O concerns? For instance, dismantling the ED could affect the talent pipeline, workforce readiness, or diversity in hiring pools.
·
**Critical lens:** The argument could be strengthened by critiquing
_how effectively_ the Department fulfills its mandates. Are there inefficiencies or areas of improvement worth noting, even if the conclusion remains pro-ED?
Anthony Hubert , Apr 6 at 2:58pm
**Add a Comment:**
[Media Comment](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/assignments/970499/submissions/65778) [Attach File](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/assignments/970499/submissions/65778)
**## TheDepartmentofEducation.docx**
2
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
Cedric Harris
Fayetteville State University
Psychology 350
Dr. Anthony Hubert
March 28, 2025
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
The United States Department of Education (ED) is the mainstay of America's educational establishment, with immense control of policy, appropriations, and civil rights enforcement. Established in 1980 under President Jimmy Carter, the department was established with the aim of consolidating all federal education programs into a single agency, to ensure equitable access to quality education for all Americans. In the last few years, political discourse on the ED has been more contentious, particularly during Donald Trump's presidency and his 2024 campaign, when he repeatedly pledged to eliminate the department. This pledge has caused extensive debate on whether the department is needed, whether it can be eliminated, and the potential impact on students, teachers, and the education system at large.
This piece delves into the Department of Education's different roles, examining its critical functions, legal and political challenges to dismantling it, and the extensive effects that this action would have. Blending thought from academic articles, news reports, and policy briefing, this discourse points out the department's unalienable role in advancing educational equity, expanding civil rights, and supporting disadvantaged student populations. The argument also gives counterarguments to eliminating or minimizing the department, providing an unbiased argument for and against on this hot topic. This essay concludes last that the Department of Education is a backbone to the integrity and affordability of the American education system and that its demise would have apocalyptic negative consequences for students, schools, and society as a whole.
**The Essential Functions of the Department of Education**
The U.S. Department of Education executes a wide array of functions that are fundamental to the administration of the U.S. education system. These functions are largely categorized under four categories: administration of federal student aid, civil rights enforcement, support to disadvantaged schools, and research and policy analysis in education.
1.
**_Federal Student Aid Programs_**
The best-known and most impactful of the ED's functions is overseeing federal student aid programs. Federal student loans, work-study jobs, and Pell Grants are such programs, providing billions of dollars in assistance to millions of students annually, enabling them to study at colleges and universities (Faguy, 2025). Pell Grants, for instance, are a safety net for low-income students, offering as much as $7,395 per year (as of 2025) to help pay for tuition and living costs. Without Pell Grants, many students would have to abandon their aspiration for education or incur debts that are not sustainable.
Federal student loans, an integral component of the ED portfolio, have students pay lesser rates and more moderate repayment terms than private loans (Brasch et al., 2025). Income-driven repayment plans and loan forgiveness schemes, also tracked by the department, illuminate the economic load of students from low-starting-wage professions such as education or social work (Brasch et al., 2025). Shutting down such programs would fall much harder on students from the lower-income group than on those which are premium, worsening inequality of opportunity in higher education access.
2.
**_Civil Rights Enforcement_**
The ED has a significant role in enforcing civil rights legislation that safeguards students from discrimination on the basis of race, gender, disability, and other characteristics. Title IX, for example, prohibits sex discrimination in schools, ensuring equal access to education and athletics for girls and women (Habash, 2025). The department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) receives and investigates allegations of discrimination and makes the schools liable for any non-compliance, making educational settings safer and more inclusive (Habash, 2025).
Also, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) plays the role of ensuring that students with disabilities have the right to free and appropriate public education. ED provides funding and oversight to compel the schools to comply with IDEA, offering accommodation by way of individualized education programs (IEPs) and special instruction (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). These protections would be compromised were there no federal enforcement, and struggling students would not have the support necessary for them to be successful.
3.
**_Funding for Disadvantaged Schools_**
Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) sends federal money to high-poverty schools to hire additional teachers, reduce class size, provide tutoring, and enhance facilities—measures with a track record of raising student achievement (Burga, 2025). In the 2024-2025 school year, Title I distributed over $16 billion to schools in the United States, reaching nearly 25 million students.
The ED also provides grants for Native American, English language learner, and rural school students that focus on distinctive needs of those student populations. As a result, for instance, the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) supports small, distant school districts in remedying funding gaps and teacher shortages (Faguy, 2025). Phasing out such programs will increase disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts even more, thereby enriching inequities in education.
4.
**_Education Research and Policy Development_**
The ED supports research on how to teach and learn best and informs educators and policymakers with findings. The Institute of Education Sciences (IES), a departmental organization, conducts large-scale studies of concerns such as early childhood learning, reading, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) attainment (Habash, 2025). This research-informed decision-making informs decision-making at the local, state, and national levels to ensure continuous improvement in education.
Further, the ED creates policies for confronting emerging problems, including mental health emergencies within schools and the digital divide. When the pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus, for instance, erupted, the department provided billions of dollars to aid schools in becoming distance learning models and overcoming lost learning (Brasch et al., 2025). States would lack coordination and adequate resources to fight such systemic concerns in the absence of federal guidance.
**The Feasibility of Dismantling the Department of Education**
In spite of demands for its abolition, the Department of Education cannot be readily abolished because of legal, political, and practical constraints.
1.
**_Congressional Approval Required_**
Congress established the ED in the Department of Education Organization Act (1980), and therefore dissolution would need legislatively to be approved. With most of its programs, such as Pell Grants and IDEA, having bipartisan backing, Congress will not likely pass such a bill (Faguy, 2025). Even some right-leaning members of Congress from rural states, which are heavily reliant on federal funding for their schools, have fought efforts to eliminate the department.
2.
**_Executive Authority is Limited_**
While a president can use executive orders to cut the ED's budget or reallocate its functions, the actions would be open to court challenges. Trump's 2025 executive order transferring the administration of student loans to the Treasury Department was stopped by the courts, who held that the switch could be done only by Congress (Burga, 2025).
3.
**_Public and State Dependence on Federal Funding_**
Most states do not have the budget capacity to make up for lost federal education funds. In Mississippi, for instance, 15% of the state's educational budget comes from federal money (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). Governors and legislatures across parties will not fund policies that risk their schools' solvency.
**Potential Consequences of Eliminating the Department of Education**
There are some negative effects that would come to be once the department of education is abolished:
1.
**_Economic Collapse of Higher Education_** _:_ Sudden elimination of federal student aid would affect millions of students who are not able to afford college, leading to crumbling enrollment numbers and the shutdown of colleges (Habash, 2025). Private lenders will fill the gap, but with higher rates of interest and lower borrower protections, deepening the crisis of student debt.
2.
**_Erosion of Civil Rights Protections_** _:_ Without federal authority, schools would be free to rescind accessibility provisions for students with disabilities or ignore Title IX complaints (Brasch et al., 2025). These changes would disproportionately impact minority groups, whose members would experience more discrimination and exclusion.
3.
**_Broadening Educational Inequalities:_** Low-income schools, which are reliant on Title I funding, would be disproportionately affected. Absent federal aid, those schools might cut after-school activities, cut teacher staffing, or even close their doors.
4.
**_Loss of National Standards and Accountability:_** The ED guarantees that every state has basic education standards. Without it, there would be a patchwork of uneven policy that harms student mobility as well as readiness in the workforce.
**Counterarguments and Rebuttals**
Those against abolishing the ED argue that states must regulate education and cutting bureaucracy is cost-effective. While local control has advantages, federal government regulation is needed to prevent inconsistency. For example, without IDEA, special education would be underfunded by states, which would deny disabled students access to services (Habash, 2025). Administrative costs in the ED are minimal (less than 2% of its spending). Most money helps students and schools directly, which makes cost-saving in abolition minimal.
**Conclusion**
The Department of Education is an essential component of America's educational landscape. Its programs and protections ensure a quality education for all students, regardless of their background. Political debates over its role will certainly continue, but the facts unequivocally attest to the need for a strong federal education agency. Strengthening, not dismantling, the department is what policymakers must keep in mind when seeking to enhance education for future generations.
References
Brasch, B., Meckler, L., & Timsit, A. (2025).
_Key functions of the Education Department, which Trump is moving to dismantle._ The Washington Post.
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/)
Burga, S. (2025).
_Can Trump Dismantle the Department of Education?_ Here’s What to Know. Time Magazine.
[https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/](https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/)
Faguy, A. (2025).
_What does the Department of Education do – and can Trump dismantle it?_ BBC News.
[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno)
Habash, T. (2025). Donald Trump Can’t Actually Dismantle the Department of Education, but His Policies Still Threaten Us All.
_Action Report #3. Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom._ [https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf](https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf)
Inskeep, S., & Haney, T. (2024).
_What Trump's pledge to close Dept. of Education means for students, GOP-led states._ NPR.
[https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education)
**## TheDepartmentofEducation.docx**
2
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
Cedric Harris
Fayetteville State University
Psychology 350
Dr. Anthony Hubert
March 28, 2025
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
The United States Department of Education (ED) is the mainstay of America's educational establishment, with immense control of policy, appropriations, and civil rights enforcement. Established in 1980 under President Jimmy Carter, the department was established with the aim of consolidating all federal education programs into a single agency, to ensure equitable access to quality education for all Americans. In the last few years, political discourse on the ED has been more contentious, particularly during Donald Trump's presidency and his 2024 campaign, when he repeatedly pledged to eliminate the department. This pledge has caused extensive debate on whether the department is needed, whether it can be eliminated, and the potential impact on students, teachers, and the education system at large.
This piece delves into the Department of Education's different roles, examining its critical functions, legal and political challenges to dismantling it, and the extensive effects that this action would have. Blending thought from academic articles, news reports, and policy briefing, this discourse points out the department's unalienable role in advancing educational equity, expanding civil rights, and supporting disadvantaged student populations. The argument also gives counterarguments to eliminating or minimizing the department, providing an unbiased argument for and against on this hot topic. This essay concludes last that the Department of Education is a backbone to the integrity and affordability of the American education system and that its demise would have apocalyptic negative consequences for students, schools, and society as a whole.
**The Essential Functions of the Department of Education**
The U.S. Department of Education executes a wide array of functions that are fundamental to the administration of the U.S. education system. These functions are largely categorized under four categories: administration of federal student aid, civil rights enforcement, support to disadvantaged schools, and research and policy analysis in education.
1.
**_Federal Student Aid Programs_**
The best-known and most impactful of the ED's functions is overseeing federal student aid programs. Federal student loans, work-study jobs, and Pell Grants are such programs, providing billions of dollars in assistance to millions of students annually, enabling them to study at colleges and universities (Faguy, 2025). Pell Grants, for instance, are a safety net for low-income students, offering as much as $7,395 per year (as of 2025) to help pay for tuition and living costs. Without Pell Grants, many students would have to abandon their aspiration for education or incur debts that are not sustainable.
Federal student loans, an integral component of the ED portfolio, have students pay lesser rates and more moderate repayment terms than private loans (Brasch et al., 2025). Income-driven repayment plans and loan forgiveness schemes, also tracked by the department, illuminate the economic load of students from low-starting-wage professions such as education or social work (Brasch et al., 2025). Shutting down such programs would fall much harder on students from the lower-income group than on those which are premium, worsening inequality of opportunity in higher education access.
2.
**_Civil Rights Enforcement_**
The ED has a significant role in enforcing civil rights legislation that safeguards students from discrimination on the basis of race, gender, disability, and other characteristics. Title IX, for example, prohibits sex discrimination in schools, ensuring equal access to education and athletics for girls and women (Habash, 2025). The department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) receives and investigates allegations of discrimination and makes the schools liable for any non-compliance, making educational settings safer and more inclusive (Habash, 2025).
Also, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) plays the role of ensuring that students with disabilities have the right to free and appropriate public education. ED provides funding and oversight to compel the schools to comply with IDEA, offering accommodation by way of individualized education programs (IEPs) and special instruction (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). These protections would be compromised were there no federal enforcement, and struggling students would not have the support necessary for them to be successful.
3.
**_Funding for Disadvantaged Schools_**
Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) sends federal money to high-poverty schools to hire additional teachers, reduce class size, provide tutoring, and enhance facilities—measures with a track record of raising student achievement (Burga, 2025). In the 2024-2025 school year, Title I distributed over $16 billion to schools in the United States, reaching nearly 25 million students.
The ED also provides grants for Native American, English language learner, and rural school students that focus on distinctive needs of those student populations. As a result, for instance, the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) supports small, distant school districts in remedying funding gaps and teacher shortages (Faguy, 2025). Phasing out such programs will increase disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts even more, thereby enriching inequities in education.
4.
**_Education Research and Policy Development_**
The ED supports research on how to teach and learn best and informs educators and policymakers with findings. The Institute of Education Sciences (IES), a departmental organization, conducts large-scale studies of concerns such as early childhood learning, reading, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) attainment (Habash, 2025). This research-informed decision-making informs decision-making at the local, state, and national levels to ensure continuous improvement in education.
Further, the ED creates policies for confronting emerging problems, including mental health emergencies within schools and the digital divide. When the pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus, for instance, erupted, the department provided billions of dollars to aid schools in becoming distance learning models and overcoming lost learning (Brasch et al., 2025). States would lack coordination and adequate resources to fight such systemic concerns in the absence of federal guidance.
**The Feasibility of Dismantling the Department of Education**
In spite of demands for its abolition, the Department of Education cannot be readily abolished because of legal, political, and practical constraints.
1.
**_Congressional Approval Required_**
Congress established the ED in the Department of Education Organization Act (1980), and therefore dissolution would need legislatively to be approved. With most of its programs, such as Pell Grants and IDEA, having bipartisan backing, Congress will not likely pass such a bill (Faguy, 2025). Even some right-leaning members of Congress from rural states, which are heavily reliant on federal funding for their schools, have fought efforts to eliminate the department.
2.
**_Executive Authority is Limited_**
While a president can use executive orders to cut the ED's budget or reallocate its functions, the actions would be open to court challenges. Trump's 2025 executive order transferring the administration of student loans to the Treasury Department was stopped by the courts, who held that the switch could be done only by Congress (Burga, 2025).
3.
**_Public and State Dependence on Federal Funding_**
Most states do not have the budget capacity to make up for lost federal education funds. In Mississippi, for instance, 15% of the state's educational budget comes from federal money (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). Governors and legislatures across parties will not fund policies that risk their schools' solvency.
**Potential Consequences of Eliminating the Department of Education**
There are some negative effects that would come to be once the department of education is abolished:
1.
**_Economic Collapse of Higher Education_** _:_ Sudden elimination of federal student aid would affect millions of students who are not able to afford college, leading to crumbling enrollment numbers and the shutdown of colleges (Habash, 2025). Private lenders will fill the gap, but with higher rates of interest and lower borrower protections, deepening the crisis of student debt.
2.
**_Erosion of Civil Rights Protections_** _:_ Without federal authority, schools would be free to rescind accessibility provisions for students with disabilities or ignore Title IX complaints (Brasch et al., 2025). These changes would disproportionately impact minority groups, whose members would experience more discrimination and exclusion.
3.
**_Broadening Educational Inequalities:_** Low-income schools, which are reliant on Title I funding, would be disproportionately affected. Absent federal aid, those schools might cut after-school activities, cut teacher staffing, or even close their doors.
4.
**_Loss of National Standards and Accountability:_** The ED guarantees that every state has basic education standards. Without it, there would be a patchwork of uneven policy that harms student mobility as well as readiness in the workforce.
**Counterarguments and Rebuttals**
Those against abolishing the ED argue that states must regulate education and cutting bureaucracy is cost-effective. While local control has advantages, federal government regulation is needed to prevent inconsistency. For example, without IDEA, special education would be underfunded by states, which would deny disabled students access to services (Habash, 2025). Administrative costs in the ED are minimal (less than 2% of its spending). Most money helps students and schools directly, which makes cost-saving in abolition minimal.
**Conclusion**
The Department of Education is an essential component of America's educational landscape. Its programs and protections ensure a quality education for all students, regardless of their background. Political debates over its role will certainly continue, but the facts unequivocally attest to the need for a strong federal education agency. Strengthening, not dismantling, the department is what policymakers must keep in mind when seeking to enhance education for future generations.
References
Brasch, B., Meckler, L., & Timsit, A. (2025).
_Key functions of the Education Department, which Trump is moving to dismantle._ The Washington Post.
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/)
Burga, S. (2025).
_Can Trump Dismantle the Department of Education?_ Here’s What to Know. Time Magazine.
[https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/](https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/)
Faguy, A. (2025).
_What does the Department of Education do – and can Trump dismantle it?_ BBC News.
[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno)
Habash, T. (2025). Donald Trump Can’t Actually Dismantle the Department of Education, but His Policies Still Threaten Us All.
_Action Report #3. Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom._ [https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf](https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf)
Inskeep, S., & Haney, T. (2024).
_What Trump's pledge to close Dept. of Education means for students, GOP-led states._ NPR.
[https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education)
**## directionsforfinalpaper.docx**
Final Term Paper –
Literature Review Paper –
By the end of this course, all enrolled students will have to present a literature review paper relevant to industrial organizational psychology. Students will submit items indicating the progress on their paper throughout the term including a paper draft prior to final paper submission. Please consult the assignments schedule for the required submissions and their deadlines. Choose a topic relevant to industrial/organizational psychology and write a minimum of 5 – 10 double-spaced pages (not including cover and reference pages), using APA format with at least 10 references from peer reviewed journals. A list of available topics may be provided for consideration – but the list of key topics and selected bibliography articles listed in the syllabus should provide some ideas. Several APA guides, and samples are provided on Canvas along with a rubric for grading the assignment.
The paper must also use and cite 10 peer-reviewed articles appropriate for the topic. The reference section of the paper must cite all the articles used for its preparation. The 10 peer- reviewed articles are the minimum; that means students may use more than 10 articles for their paper. All papers must be written in accordance with APA guidelines, and should be careful not to plagiarize.
Papers will be assessed for plagiarism with Turnitin during the writing process. Thus, students must submit a copy of their proposal to the software in Canvas by the deadline stated below. (Section removed regarding
**Similarity Report** requirement for final submission. They key is that you have been made aware of possible similarities indicated by the Turnitin system and have made an effort to ensure proper credit has been provided to the originators of work, ideas, concepts, etc.). The paper must be submitted to the instructor no later than 11:59 PM on April 22nd . The paper will be graded primarily based upon the content of what is written, although issues of form, grammar and spelling will influence grading. YOU MAY NOT USE A PAPER FROM ANOTHER CLASS (PREVIOUS NOR CURRENT COURSE).
**## FEEDBACK.docx**
FEEDBACK:
**1. Clarity & Organization**
**Strengths:**
· The structure is logical and follows a clear progression: it introduces the topic, outlines the department’s functions, discusses the feasibility of dismantling it, explores the consequences, and addresses counterarguments.
· Each major function of the Department of Education is broken into digestible subsections with headings, aiding reader comprehension.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Introduction and thesis clarity:** The first paragraph could more clearly preview the structure of the paper and main argument. For example, the thesis could better state that the essay argues for
_maintaining_ the Department of Education based on its multiple critical functions.
·
**Redundant phrases:** Phrases like “This piece delves into…” and “This discourse points out…” could be more concise. Consider simply stating “This paper examines…” or directly launching into the argument.
·
**Transitions:** Some sections (e.g., from "Education Research and Policy Development" to "The Feasibility of Dismantling…") feel abrupt. Use transition sentences to guide the reader through shifts in focus.
**2. Content Development**
**Strengths:**
· The paper presents a strong, evidence-based case for the Department of Education's continued relevance, backed by current news and academic sources.
· Key programs (e.g., Pell Grants, Title I, IDEA) are well-explained with contemporary data and policy context.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Theoretical integration:** While the paper is rich in policy content, it could benefit from incorporating relevant
**I/O Psychology theories**—for example, educational equity as related to
_workforce development_,
_social mobility_, or
_organizational policy frameworks_. Linking the content back to I/O psych concepts would make it more suitable for the course.
·
**Depth of analysis:** The paper presents strong descriptions but could engage more critically with the material. For example, when discussing Pell Grants or IDEA, consider exploring
_why_ these federal efforts outperform state-level approaches.
·
**Balanced argumentation:** While it acknowledges counterarguments, the rebuttals could be more nuanced. It may help to cite a source that supports local control or critiques federal bureaucracy, then offer a more developed counter-response.
**3. Writing & APA Formatting**
**Strengths:**
· Generally strong grammar and vocabulary.
· APA formatting of references is on the right track and includes current sources.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Grammar/wording:** Some awkward or unclear phrasing:
· “The department was established with the aim of consolidating…” → “It was created to consolidate…”
· “Premium” in “those which are premium” is vague. Consider “higher-income students” or “those from affluent backgrounds.”
· Avoid hyperbole like “apocalyptic negative consequences.”
·
**APA formatting:**
· The title page should include a running head (if following APA 6) or centered title and page number only (APA 7).
· In-text citations need refinement. For example:
· “(Brasch et al., 2025)” is used several times, but page numbers are not included when quoting or referring to specific claims. If paraphrased, that’s okay, but make it clear.
· References should be double-spaced and have a hanging indent. URLs should not be followed by a period.
**4. Research Gaps & Critical Thinking**
**Strengths:**
· The paper raises an urgent and relevant policy debate with real-world implications.
· It shows thoughtful consideration of funding equity and legal complexity.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Missing perspectives:** Could benefit from integrating perspectives of teachers, administrators, or students (qualitative voices). Are there recent surveys or studies reflecting these stakeholders’ views?
·
**Future implications:** What does the debate suggest about the
_future of work_ or educational pathways into professional life—key I/O concerns? For instance, dismantling the ED could affect the talent pipeline, workforce readiness, or diversity in hiring pools.
·
**Critical lens:** The argument could be strengthened by critiquing
_how effectively_ the Department fulfills its mandates. Are there inefficiencies or areas of improvement worth noting, even if the conclusion remains pro-ED?
Anthony Hubert , Apr 6 at 2:58pm
**Add a Comment:**
[Media Comment](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/assignments/970499/submissions/65778) [Attach File](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/assignments/970499/submissions/65778)
**## TheDepartmentofEducation.docx**
2
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
Cedric Harris
Fayetteville State University
Psychology 350
Dr. Anthony Hubert
March 28, 2025
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
The United States Department of Education (ED) is the mainstay of America's educational establishment, with immense control of policy, appropriations, and civil rights enforcement. Established in 1980 under President Jimmy Carter, the department was established with the aim of consolidating all federal education programs into a single agency, to ensure equitable access to quality education for all Americans. In the last few years, political discourse on the ED has been more contentious, particularly during Donald Trump's presidency and his 2024 campaign, when he repeatedly pledged to eliminate the department. This pledge has caused extensive debate on whether the department is needed, whether it can be eliminated, and the potential impact on students, teachers, and the education system at large.
This piece delves into the Department of Education's different roles, examining its critical functions, legal and political challenges to dismantling it, and the extensive effects that this action would have. Blending thought from academic articles, news reports, and policy briefing, this discourse points out the department's unalienable role in advancing educational equity, expanding civil rights, and supporting disadvantaged student populations. The argument also gives counterarguments to eliminating or minimizing the department, providing an unbiased argument for and against on this hot topic. This essay concludes last that the Department of Education is a backbone to the integrity and affordability of the American education system and that its demise would have apocalyptic negative consequences for students, schools, and society as a whole.
**The Essential Functions of the Department of Education**
The U.S. Department of Education executes a wide array of functions that are fundamental to the administration of the U.S. education system. These functions are largely categorized under four categories: administration of federal student aid, civil rights enforcement, support to disadvantaged schools, and research and policy analysis in education.
1.
**_Federal Student Aid Programs_**
The best-known and most impactful of the ED's functions is overseeing federal student aid programs. Federal student loans, work-study jobs, and Pell Grants are such programs, providing billions of dollars in assistance to millions of students annually, enabling them to study at colleges and universities (Faguy, 2025). Pell Grants, for instance, are a safety net for low-income students, offering as much as $7,395 per year (as of 2025) to help pay for tuition and living costs. Without Pell Grants, many students would have to abandon their aspiration for education or incur debts that are not sustainable.
Federal student loans, an integral component of the ED portfolio, have students pay lesser rates and more moderate repayment terms than private loans (Brasch et al., 2025). Income-driven repayment plans and loan forgiveness schemes, also tracked by the department, illuminate the economic load of students from low-starting-wage professions such as education or social work (Brasch et al., 2025). Shutting down such programs would fall much harder on students from the lower-income group than on those which are premium, worsening inequality of opportunity in higher education access.
2.
**_Civil Rights Enforcement_**
The ED has a significant role in enforcing civil rights legislation that safeguards students from discrimination on the basis of race, gender, disability, and other characteristics. Title IX, for example, prohibits sex discrimination in schools, ensuring equal access to education and athletics for girls and women (Habash, 2025). The department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) receives and investigates allegations of discrimination and makes the schools liable for any non-compliance, making educational settings safer and more inclusive (Habash, 2025).
Also, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) plays the role of ensuring that students with disabilities have the right to free and appropriate public education. ED provides funding and oversight to compel the schools to comply with IDEA, offering accommodation by way of individualized education programs (IEPs) and special instruction (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). These protections would be compromised were there no federal enforcement, and struggling students would not have the support necessary for them to be successful.
3.
**_Funding for Disadvantaged Schools_**
Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) sends federal money to high-poverty schools to hire additional teachers, reduce class size, provide tutoring, and enhance facilities—measures with a track record of raising student achievement (Burga, 2025). In the 2024-2025 school year, Title I distributed over $16 billion to schools in the United States, reaching nearly 25 million students.
The ED also provides grants for Native American, English language learner, and rural school students that focus on distinctive needs of those student populations. As a result, for instance, the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) supports small, distant school districts in remedying funding gaps and teacher shortages (Faguy, 2025). Phasing out such programs will increase disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts even more, thereby enriching inequities in education.
4.
**_Education Research and Policy Development_**
The ED supports research on how to teach and learn best and informs educators and policymakers with findings. The Institute of Education Sciences (IES), a departmental organization, conducts large-scale studies of concerns such as early childhood learning, reading, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) attainment (Habash, 2025). This research-informed decision-making informs decision-making at the local, state, and national levels to ensure continuous improvement in education.
Further, the ED creates policies for confronting emerging problems, including mental health emergencies within schools and the digital divide. When the pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus, for instance, erupted, the department provided billions of dollars to aid schools in becoming distance learning models and overcoming lost learning (Brasch et al., 2025). States would lack coordination and adequate resources to fight such systemic concerns in the absence of federal guidance.
**The Feasibility of Dismantling the Department of Education**
In spite of demands for its abolition, the Department of Education cannot be readily abolished because of legal, political, and practical constraints.
1.
**_Congressional Approval Required_**
Congress established the ED in the Department of Education Organization Act (1980), and therefore dissolution would need legislatively to be approved. With most of its programs, such as Pell Grants and IDEA, having bipartisan backing, Congress will not likely pass such a bill (Faguy, 2025). Even some right-leaning members of Congress from rural states, which are heavily reliant on federal funding for their schools, have fought efforts to eliminate the department.
2.
**_Executive Authority is Limited_**
While a president can use executive orders to cut the ED's budget or reallocate its functions, the actions would be open to court challenges. Trump's 2025 executive order transferring the administration of student loans to the Treasury Department was stopped by the courts, who held that the switch could be done only by Congress (Burga, 2025).
3.
**_Public and State Dependence on Federal Funding_**
Most states do not have the budget capacity to make up for lost federal education funds. In Mississippi, for instance, 15% of the state's educational budget comes from federal money (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). Governors and legislatures across parties will not fund policies that risk their schools' solvency.
**Potential Consequences of Eliminating the Department of Education**
There are some negative effects that would come to be once the department of education is abolished:
1.
**_Economic Collapse of Higher Education_** _:_ Sudden elimination of federal student aid would affect millions of students who are not able to afford college, leading to crumbling enrollment numbers and the shutdown of colleges (Habash, 2025). Private lenders will fill the gap, but with higher rates of interest and lower borrower protections, deepening the crisis of student debt.
2.
**_Erosion of Civil Rights Protections_** _:_ Without federal authority, schools would be free to rescind accessibility provisions for students with disabilities or ignore Title IX complaints (Brasch et al., 2025). These changes would disproportionately impact minority groups, whose members would experience more discrimination and exclusion.
3.
**_Broadening Educational Inequalities:_** Low-income schools, which are reliant on Title I funding, would be disproportionately affected. Absent federal aid, those schools might cut after-school activities, cut teacher staffing, or even close their doors.
4.
**_Loss of National Standards and Accountability:_** The ED guarantees that every state has basic education standards. Without it, there would be a patchwork of uneven policy that harms student mobility as well as readiness in the workforce.
**Counterarguments and Rebuttals**
Those against abolishing the ED argue that states must regulate education and cutting bureaucracy is cost-effective. While local control has advantages, federal government regulation is needed to prevent inconsistency. For example, without IDEA, special education would be underfunded by states, which would deny disabled students access to services (Habash, 2025). Administrative costs in the ED are minimal (less than 2% of its spending). Most money helps students and schools directly, which makes cost-saving in abolition minimal.
**Conclusion**
The Department of Education is an essential component of America's educational landscape. Its programs and protections ensure a quality education for all students, regardless of their background. Political debates over its role will certainly continue, but the facts unequivocally attest to the need for a strong federal education agency. Strengthening, not dismantling, the department is what policymakers must keep in mind when seeking to enhance education for future generations.
References
Brasch, B., Meckler, L., & Timsit, A. (2025).
_Key functions of the Education Department, which Trump is moving to dismantle._ The Washington Post.
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/)
Burga, S. (2025).
_Can Trump Dismantle the Department of Education?_ Here’s What to Know. Time Magazine.
[https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/](https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/)
Faguy, A. (2025).
_What does the Department of Education do – and can Trump dismantle it?_ BBC News.
[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno)
Habash, T. (2025). Donald Trump Can’t Actually Dismantle the Department of Education, but His Policies Still Threaten Us All.
_Action Report #3. Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom._ [https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf](https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf)
Inskeep, S., & Haney, T. (2024).
_What Trump's pledge to close Dept. of Education means for students, GOP-led states._ NPR.
[https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education)
**## directionsforfinalpaper.docx**
Final Term Paper –
Literature Review Paper –
By the end of this course, all enrolled students will have to present a literature review paper relevant to industrial organizational psychology. Students will submit items indicating the progress on their paper throughout the term including a paper draft prior to final paper submission. Please consult the assignments schedule for the required submissions and their deadlines. Choose a topic relevant to industrial/organizational psychology and write a minimum of 5 – 10 double-spaced pages (not including cover and reference pages), using APA format with at least 10 references from peer reviewed journals. A list of available topics may be provided for consideration – but the list of key topics and selected bibliography articles listed in the syllabus should provide some ideas. Several APA guides, and samples are provided on Canvas along with a rubric for grading the assignment.
The paper must also use and cite 10 peer-reviewed articles appropriate for the topic. The reference section of the paper must cite all the articles used for its preparation. The 10 peer- reviewed articles are the minimum; that means students may use more than 10 articles for their paper. All papers must be written in accordance with APA guidelines, and should be careful not to plagiarize.
Papers will be assessed for plagiarism with Turnitin during the writing process. Thus, students must submit a copy of their proposal to the software in Canvas by the deadline stated below. (Section removed regarding
**Similarity Report** requirement for final submission. They key is that you have been made aware of possible similarities indicated by the Turnitin system and have made an effort to ensure proper credit has been provided to the originators of work, ideas, concepts, etc.). The paper must be submitted to the instructor no later than 11:59 PM on April 22nd . The paper will be graded primarily based upon the content of what is written, although issues of form, grammar and spelling will influence grading. YOU MAY NOT USE A PAPER FROM ANOTHER CLASS (PREVIOUS NOR CURRENT COURSE).
**## FEEDBACK.docx**
FEEDBACK:
**1. Clarity & Organization**
**Strengths:**
· The structure is logical and follows a clear progression: it introduces the topic, outlines the department’s functions, discusses the feasibility of dismantling it, explores the consequences, and addresses counterarguments.
· Each major function of the Department of Education is broken into digestible subsections with headings, aiding reader comprehension.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Introduction and thesis clarity:** The first paragraph could more clearly preview the structure of the paper and main argument. For example, the thesis could better state that the essay argues for
_maintaining_ the Department of Education based on its multiple critical functions.
·
**Redundant phrases:** Phrases like “This piece delves into…” and “This discourse points out…” could be more concise. Consider simply stating “This paper examines…” or directly launching into the argument.
·
**Transitions:** Some sections (e.g., from "Education Research and Policy Development" to "The Feasibility of Dismantling…") feel abrupt. Use transition sentences to guide the reader through shifts in focus.
**2. Content Development**
**Strengths:**
· The paper presents a strong, evidence-based case for the Department of Education's continued relevance, backed by current news and academic sources.
· Key programs (e.g., Pell Grants, Title I, IDEA) are well-explained with contemporary data and policy context.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Theoretical integration:** While the paper is rich in policy content, it could benefit from incorporating relevant
**I/O Psychology theories**—for example, educational equity as related to
_workforce development_,
_social mobility_, or
_organizational policy frameworks_. Linking the content back to I/O psych concepts would make it more suitable for the course.
·
**Depth of analysis:** The paper presents strong descriptions but could engage more critically with the material. For example, when discussing Pell Grants or IDEA, consider exploring
_why_ these federal efforts outperform state-level approaches.
·
**Balanced argumentation:** While it acknowledges counterarguments, the rebuttals could be more nuanced. It may help to cite a source that supports local control or critiques federal bureaucracy, then offer a more developed counter-response.
**3. Writing & APA Formatting**
**Strengths:**
· Generally strong grammar and vocabulary.
· APA formatting of references is on the right track and includes current sources.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Grammar/wording:** Some awkward or unclear phrasing:
· “The department was established with the aim of consolidating…” → “It was created to consolidate…”
· “Premium” in “those which are premium” is vague. Consider “higher-income students” or “those from affluent backgrounds.”
· Avoid hyperbole like “apocalyptic negative consequences.”
·
**APA formatting:**
· The title page should include a running head (if following APA 6) or centered title and page number only (APA 7).
· In-text citations need refinement. For example:
· “(Brasch et al., 2025)” is used several times, but page numbers are not included when quoting or referring to specific claims. If paraphrased, that’s okay, but make it clear.
· References should be double-spaced and have a hanging indent. URLs should not be followed by a period.
**4. Research Gaps & Critical Thinking**
**Strengths:**
· The paper raises an urgent and relevant policy debate with real-world implications.
· It shows thoughtful consideration of funding equity and legal complexity.
**Areas for Improvement:**
·
**Missing perspectives:** Could benefit from integrating perspectives of teachers, administrators, or students (qualitative voices). Are there recent surveys or studies reflecting these stakeholders’ views?
·
**Future implications:** What does the debate suggest about the
_future of work_ or educational pathways into professional life—key I/O concerns? For instance, dismantling the ED could affect the talent pipeline, workforce readiness, or diversity in hiring pools.
·
**Critical lens:** The argument could be strengthened by critiquing
_how effectively_ the Department fulfills its mandates. Are there inefficiencies or areas of improvement worth noting, even if the conclusion remains pro-ED?
Anthony Hubert , Apr 6 at 2:58pm
**Add a Comment:**
[Media Comment](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/assignments/970499/submissions/65778) [Attach File](https://uncfsu.instructure.com/courses/43267/assignments/970499/submissions/65778)
**## TheDepartmentofEducation.docx**
2
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
Cedric Harris
Fayetteville State University
Psychology 350
Dr. Anthony Hubert
March 28, 2025
**The Role of the Department of Education and Its Importance to American Students**
The United States Department of Education (ED) is the mainstay of America's educational establishment, with immense control of policy, appropriations, and civil rights enforcement. Established in 1980 under President Jimmy Carter, the department was established with the aim of consolidating all federal education programs into a single agency, to ensure equitable access to quality education for all Americans. In the last few years, political discourse on the ED has been more contentious, particularly during Donald Trump's presidency and his 2024 campaign, when he repeatedly pledged to eliminate the department. This pledge has caused extensive debate on whether the department is needed, whether it can be eliminated, and the potential impact on students, teachers, and the education system at large.
This piece delves into the Department of Education's different roles, examining its critical functions, legal and political challenges to dismantling it, and the extensive effects that this action would have. Blending thought from academic articles, news reports, and policy briefing, this discourse points out the department's unalienable role in advancing educational equity, expanding civil rights, and supporting disadvantaged student populations. The argument also gives counterarguments to eliminating or minimizing the department, providing an unbiased argument for and against on this hot topic. This essay concludes last that the Department of Education is a backbone to the integrity and affordability of the American education system and that its demise would have apocalyptic negative consequences for students, schools, and society as a whole.
**The Essential Functions of the Department of Education**
The U.S. Department of Education executes a wide array of functions that are fundamental to the administration of the U.S. education system. These functions are largely categorized under four categories: administration of federal student aid, civil rights enforcement, support to disadvantaged schools, and research and policy analysis in education.
1.
**_Federal Student Aid Programs_**
The best-known and most impactful of the ED's functions is overseeing federal student aid programs. Federal student loans, work-study jobs, and Pell Grants are such programs, providing billions of dollars in assistance to millions of students annually, enabling them to study at colleges and universities (Faguy, 2025). Pell Grants, for instance, are a safety net for low-income students, offering as much as $7,395 per year (as of 2025) to help pay for tuition and living costs. Without Pell Grants, many students would have to abandon their aspiration for education or incur debts that are not sustainable.
Federal student loans, an integral component of the ED portfolio, have students pay lesser rates and more moderate repayment terms than private loans (Brasch et al., 2025). Income-driven repayment plans and loan forgiveness schemes, also tracked by the department, illuminate the economic load of students from low-starting-wage professions such as education or social work (Brasch et al., 2025). Shutting down such programs would fall much harder on students from the lower-income group than on those which are premium, worsening inequality of opportunity in higher education access.
2.
**_Civil Rights Enforcement_**
The ED has a significant role in enforcing civil rights legislation that safeguards students from discrimination on the basis of race, gender, disability, and other characteristics. Title IX, for example, prohibits sex discrimination in schools, ensuring equal access to education and athletics for girls and women (Habash, 2025). The department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) receives and investigates allegations of discrimination and makes the schools liable for any non-compliance, making educational settings safer and more inclusive (Habash, 2025).
Also, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) plays the role of ensuring that students with disabilities have the right to free and appropriate public education. ED provides funding and oversight to compel the schools to comply with IDEA, offering accommodation by way of individualized education programs (IEPs) and special instruction (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). These protections would be compromised were there no federal enforcement, and struggling students would not have the support necessary for them to be successful.
3.
**_Funding for Disadvantaged Schools_**
Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) sends federal money to high-poverty schools to hire additional teachers, reduce class size, provide tutoring, and enhance facilities—measures with a track record of raising student achievement (Burga, 2025). In the 2024-2025 school year, Title I distributed over $16 billion to schools in the United States, reaching nearly 25 million students.
The ED also provides grants for Native American, English language learner, and rural school students that focus on distinctive needs of those student populations. As a result, for instance, the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) supports small, distant school districts in remedying funding gaps and teacher shortages (Faguy, 2025). Phasing out such programs will increase disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts even more, thereby enriching inequities in education.
4.
**_Education Research and Policy Development_**
The ED supports research on how to teach and learn best and informs educators and policymakers with findings. The Institute of Education Sciences (IES), a departmental organization, conducts large-scale studies of concerns such as early childhood learning, reading, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) attainment (Habash, 2025). This research-informed decision-making informs decision-making at the local, state, and national levels to ensure continuous improvement in education.
Further, the ED creates policies for confronting emerging problems, including mental health emergencies within schools and the digital divide. When the pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus, for instance, erupted, the department provided billions of dollars to aid schools in becoming distance learning models and overcoming lost learning (Brasch et al., 2025). States would lack coordination and adequate resources to fight such systemic concerns in the absence of federal guidance.
**The Feasibility of Dismantling the Department of Education**
In spite of demands for its abolition, the Department of Education cannot be readily abolished because of legal, political, and practical constraints.
1.
**_Congressional Approval Required_**
Congress established the ED in the Department of Education Organization Act (1980), and therefore dissolution would need legislatively to be approved. With most of its programs, such as Pell Grants and IDEA, having bipartisan backing, Congress will not likely pass such a bill (Faguy, 2025). Even some right-leaning members of Congress from rural states, which are heavily reliant on federal funding for their schools, have fought efforts to eliminate the department.
2.
**_Executive Authority is Limited_**
While a president can use executive orders to cut the ED's budget or reallocate its functions, the actions would be open to court challenges. Trump's 2025 executive order transferring the administration of student loans to the Treasury Department was stopped by the courts, who held that the switch could be done only by Congress (Burga, 2025).
3.
**_Public and State Dependence on Federal Funding_**
Most states do not have the budget capacity to make up for lost federal education funds. In Mississippi, for instance, 15% of the state's educational budget comes from federal money (Inskeep & Haney, 2024). Governors and legislatures across parties will not fund policies that risk their schools' solvency.
**Potential Consequences of Eliminating the Department of Education**
There are some negative effects that would come to be once the department of education is abolished:
1.
**_Economic Collapse of Higher Education_** _:_ Sudden elimination of federal student aid would affect millions of students who are not able to afford college, leading to crumbling enrollment numbers and the shutdown of colleges (Habash, 2025). Private lenders will fill the gap, but with higher rates of interest and lower borrower protections, deepening the crisis of student debt.
2.
**_Erosion of Civil Rights Protections_** _:_ Without federal authority, schools would be free to rescind accessibility provisions for students with disabilities or ignore Title IX complaints (Brasch et al., 2025). These changes would disproportionately impact minority groups, whose members would experience more discrimination and exclusion.
3.
**_Broadening Educational Inequalities:_** Low-income schools, which are reliant on Title I funding, would be disproportionately affected. Absent federal aid, those schools might cut after-school activities, cut teacher staffing, or even close their doors.
4.
**_Loss of National Standards and Accountability:_** The ED guarantees that every state has basic education standards. Without it, there would be a patchwork of uneven policy that harms student mobility as well as readiness in the workforce.
**Counterarguments and Rebuttals**
Those against abolishing the ED argue that states must regulate education and cutting bureaucracy is cost-effective. While local control has advantages, federal government regulation is needed to prevent inconsistency. For example, without IDEA, special education would be underfunded by states, which would deny disabled students access to services (Habash, 2025). Administrative costs in the ED are minimal (less than 2% of its spending). Most money helps students and schools directly, which makes cost-saving in abolition minimal.
**Conclusion**
The Department of Education is an essential component of America's educational landscape. Its programs and protections ensure a quality education for all students, regardless of their background. Political debates over its role will certainly continue, but the facts unequivocally attest to the need for a strong federal education agency. Strengthening, not dismantling, the department is what policymakers must keep in mind when seeking to enhance education for future generations.
References
Brasch, B., Meckler, L., & Timsit, A. (2025).
_Key functions of the Education Department, which Trump is moving to dismantle._ The Washington Post.
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/04/department-of-education-explained-trump/)
Burga, S. (2025).
_Can Trump Dismantle the Department of Education?_ Here’s What to Know. Time Magazine.
[https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/](https://time.com/7213488/trump-dismantle-department-of-education/)
Faguy, A. (2025).
_What does the Department of Education do – and can Trump dismantle it?_ BBC News.
[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno)
Habash, T. (2025). Donald Trump Can’t Actually Dismantle the Department of Education, but His Policies Still Threaten Us All.
_Action Report #3. Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom._ [https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf](https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/ActionReport3_%20Will_Trump_Dismantle_Dept_of_ED.docx.pdf)
Inskeep, S., & Haney, T. (2024).
_What Trump's pledge to close Dept. of Education means for students, GOP-led states._ NPR.
[https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5181966/a-look-at-the-potential-impact-of-shutting-down-the-department-of-education)
In psychology, factor analysis is a statistical method used to identify underlying relationships between variables by reducing a large set of variables to a smaller, more manageable set of factors. Essentially, factor analysis enables researchers to understand the data structure and identify variabl…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →In psychology, factor analysis is a statistical method used to identify underlying relationships between variables by reducing a large set of variables to a smaller, more manageable set of factors. Essentially, factor analysis enables researchers to understand the data structure and identify variables that tend to cluster together, suggesting they are influenced by the same underlying factors (Gary R. VandenBos, 2015).
An example of an assessment instrument that has delineated factors is the MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2). The MMPI-2 contains 567 true-false questions addressing mental health symptoms, beliefs, and attitudes that are grouped into scales (clusters of items) that address specific clinical problems such as depression or anxiety. An MMPI scale allows the clinician to compare the client's responses with those of thousands of others. To gain a perspective on the patient's test results, the MMPI-2 scores are compared to the normative sample, a large representative sample of people from across the United States. This comparison allows the interpreter to determine if the person's responses are different from those of people who do not have mental health problems. Suppose the patient obtains scores in the extreme ranges, for example, on the Depression scale (compared with the normative sample). In that case, they are likely to be experiencing problems comparable to the clinical samples of depressed clients that have been studied. The MMPI-2 results provide the practitioner with a clearer understanding of the patient's symptoms and personality features, helping to identify potential areas for exploration in therapy.
Factor analysis is a statistical technique used to identify underlying dimensions or factors that explain the relationships between variables in a dataset. The MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2) comprises a range of scales and subscales designed to evaluate various aspects of personality and psychopathology. These scales can be broadly categorized into clinical, content, and validity scales.
The original 10 clinical scales are designed to measure various psychological and psychiatric traits **.** They include Hypochondriasis (Hs), Depression (D), Hysteria (Hy), Psychopathic Deviate (Pd), Masculinity-Femininity (Mf), Paranoia (Pa), Psychasthenia (Pt), Schizophrenia (Sc), Hypomania (Ma), and Social Introversion (Si). The MMPI-2 content scales provide specific insights into various psychological issues by focusing on distinct themes and problems, offering a more detailed picture of an individual's personality and difficulties. Some examples include anxiety, depression, fears, obsession, bizarre mentation, anger, cynicism, low self-esteem, social discomfort, and antisocial practices. The MMPI-2 validity scales help determine the reliability of a test taker's responses and identify potential issues, such as faking good or bad, or random responding. These scales help ensure the accuracy of the personality profile by flagging potentially invalid profiles as Over-Reporting/Exaggerating Symptoms (Faking Bad) or Under-Reporting/Minimizing Symptoms (Faking Good).
Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) have been used in research with the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF, each serving different purposes. The difference between them is that EFA is used to identify underlying factors within a dataset, while CFA tests a pre-existing theoretical model of those factors. Studies have used EFA to explore the structure of the MMPI-2-RF items about specific diagnoses like schizophrenia and ASD, and to compare the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF in assessing personality characteristics. CFA has been used to examine how existing MMPI-2-RF scales map onto a latent structure and to test the psychometric properties of subscales within the MMPI-2 PSY-5 modes.
References
Butcher, J. N. (1999). _A beginner's guide to the MMPI-2_. American Psychological Association
Gary R VandenBos, E. (2015). _APA concise dictionary of psychology_.
Floyd AE, Gupta V. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. [Updated 2023 Apr 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557525/
Quilty LC, Bagby RM. Psychometric and structural analysis of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) facet subscale
– a year ago
Review for edits – 2 years ago
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Review for edits
– 2 years ago
APA 7ed Format 300 words – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ThreadResponse2.docx **## ThreadResponse2.docx** **Replies** Replies should demonstrate a deep understanding of the coursework, extending the discussion by building on the original post and introducing additional academic perspectives. Replie…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →APA 7ed Format
300 words
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## ThreadResponse2.docx
**## ThreadResponse2.docx**
**Replies**
Replies should demonstrate a deep understanding of the coursework, extending the discussion by building on the original post and introducing additional academic perspectives. Replies should also spur critical thinking in peers going beyond simple agreement, this should be done by asking questions for further discussion and bringing in different resources than those used by your peers. Each reply must be supported by at
**least one recent scholarly source (from within the last three years)** and should demonstrate the ability to synthesize your classmate's ideas with your own, creating an insightful dialogue grounded in evidence-based research.
Additionally, your replies must:
· Meet the required word count of
_at least 300 words_ each.
**Response to this…**
**What appealed to you the most about the group stage you selected? In other words, there was a reason you chose a particular group stage: What was it?**
**## ThreadResponse2.docx**
**Replies**
Replies should demonstrate a deep understanding of the coursework, extending the discussion by building on the original post and introducing additional academic perspectives. Replies should also spur critical thinking in peers going beyond simple agreement, this should be done by asking questions for further discussion and bringing in different resources than those used by your peers. Each reply must be supported by at
**least one recent scholarly source (from within the last three years)** and should demonstrate the ability to synthesize your classmate's ideas with your own, creating an insightful dialogue grounded in evidence-based research.
Additionally, your replies must:
· Meet the required word count of
_at least 300 words_ each.
**Response to this…**
**What appealed to you the most about the group stage you selected? In other words, there was a reason you chose a particular group stage: What was it?**
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology Diversity assignment.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
Please see attachments – a year ago **files (1)** – ## Week2Assignment1.docx **## Week2Assignment1.docx** Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the [_Ethics in Grant Management Part 2: Addressing Equity in Ethical Conduct of Federal Grant Programs Administration_ Links to an external si…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Please see attachments
– a year ago
**files (1)**
– ## Week2Assignment1.docx
**## Week2Assignment1.docx**
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the
[_Ethics in Grant Management Part 2: Addressing Equity in Ethical Conduct of Federal Grant Programs Administration_ Links to an external site.](https://coscda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ethical-Conduct-Admin-of-Grant-Programs-with-Attn-to-Equity-Sept2023.pdf) slides.
For this assignment, you will download the Worksheet 2.1: Letter of Inquiry Questionnaire from your
_text,_ [_Winning Grants Step by Step: The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful ProposalsLinks to an external site._](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5842957) (5th ed.). Complete questions 2-9 (2-3 sentences each) by typing your responses directly into the worksheet and upload the completed worksheet as part of your assignment.
Next, use the worksheet to write a formal letter of inquiry. Address your cover letter to Mary Smith, PhD, as provided in the Sample Letter of Inquiry on page 25 in your textbook. Be sure to cite properly, according to APA standards, when you pull information from another source.
**Note:** You will use your responses from this worksheet to craft the final letter of inquiry that will be included in your grant proposal/final project in Week 6.
**Submission Requirements**
The Letter of Inquiry paper
· must include a completed copy of worksheet 2.1
· a cover page is not necessary
· must utilize academic voice.
· Review the
[_Academic VoiceLinks to an external site._](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.
· must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
[_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.
· must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.
· Refer to the
[_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
Carefully review the
[Grading RubricLinks to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/37350/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Step 2—Developing Relationships with Funders 25
Sample Letter of Inquiry
Date
Ms. Wendy Wonder
President
Future Foundation
0000 Clinton Avenue, Suite 2330
Anytown, Any State 02009
Dear Ms. Wonder:
As follow-up to my recent conversation with Lisa Bryant, I am pleased to submit this Letter of Inquiry
for Alyson Eats for your consideration. We are respectfully requesting a general support grant of $50,000
for our comprehensive programs to address hunger and food insecurity in some of our community’s most
underserved areas.
Since 2004, Alyson Eats has sought to ease the suffering of some of the approximately 130,000 residents
of Alyson who are experiencing or at risk for hunger. Our objective over the coming year is to provide more
than 200,000 nutritious meals to hungry children and adults on Alyson’s south side.
Alyson Eats will engage our nine staff members (five are part-time), our 50 regular volunteers, and our
corporate and other institutional partners across the city to conduct three proven programs to address
hunger: our food pantry and distribution service, which will distribute approximately 9,000 boxes of food
this year; a summer-time program that will provide meals to about 1,000 children who normally get free
lunch at school; and an outreach program to recruit and engage donors of food and funds, as well as vol-
unteers, with a goal this year of recruiting 15 new volunteers and generating 4,500 additional hours of
volunteer engagement. We will also pilot a new program to equip teenagers with the skills to eat health-
fully and affordably for life, beginning with a class of 30 young people. The Fiscal Year 2020 budget of
Alyson Eats is $1,352,016. We have secured commitments for about 85 percent of our budget.
Thank you for inviting Alyson Eats to submit this Letter of Inquiry. Because of our shared commitment to
building a better future for families struggling with poverty in our state, we hope that the Future Founda-
tion will invite a full proposal for $50,000 in general operating support for the one-year period beginning
January 1. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (111) 111–1111.
Sincerely,
Shawna Jones
Executive Director
Now that a sample LOI has been presented and reviewed, take the time
to answer the questions in Worksheet 2.1. This exercise will help in develop-
ing a strong letter of inquiry for funders. If you cannot clearly and succinctly
answer the questions, that probably means you need to gather more infor-
mation before you can effectively complete an LOI.
O'Neal-McElrath, Tori, et al. Winning Grants Step by Step : The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful Proposals, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated,
2019. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5842957.
Created from ashford-ebooks on 2025-04-24 02:44:37.
C
op
yr
ig
ht
©
2
01
9.
J
oh
n
W
ile
y
&
S
on
s,
In
co
rp
or
at
ed
. A
ll
rig
ht
s
re
se
rv
ed
.
## image1.emf
26 Winning Grants Step by Step
•On the
Web
WORKSHEET 2.1:
Letter of Inquiry Questionnaire
1. What is the purpose of this letter of inquiry? To whom is it being sent, and what is the
connection?
2. Is the name of the program and amount of the request clearly stated in the first paragraph?
3. What year was the organization founded? What is the mission of the organization?
4. What are the long-term goals for the organization? What programs does the organization conduct
that support these goals?
5. What is the need in the community that you seek funding to address? What population and or
geographic areas does the program serve?
6. Is the need the proposed program intends to meet clear? Are some preliminary data included to
support the need for the proposed program?
7. What does the organization propose to do about this need and what success has it had
in the past?
8. What outcomes does the organization and/or its program(s) anticipate reaching over the
next year?
9. Is program implementation briefly described?
10. Is the “fit” or natural connection between the organization’s program and the funder’s priority
areas, as identified in their guidelines, included?
11. What is the total cost of the proposed idea for the requested year, or what is the cost to expand the
current program? (Or multiple years if you plan to request multiple-year funding?) If there is some
funding already committed to the project, is it mentioned?
12. How much is being requested from the funder, for what time period, and how will it be used?
13. Is the program’s contact person clearly identified, including all contact information?
Winning Grants Step by Step, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
O'Neal-McElrath, Tori, et al. Winning Grants Step by Step : The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful Proposals, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated,
2019. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5842957.
Created from ashford-ebooks on 2025-04-24 02:43:41.
C
op
yr
ig
ht
©
2
01
9.
J
oh
n
W
ile
y
&
S
on
s,
In
co
rp
or
at
ed
. A
ll
rig
ht
s
re
se
rv
ed
.
## image2.emf
**## Week2Assignment1.docx**
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the
[_Ethics in Grant Management Part 2: Addressing Equity in Ethical Conduct of Federal Grant Programs Administration_ Links to an external site.](https://coscda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Ethical-Conduct-Admin-of-Grant-Programs-with-Attn-to-Equity-Sept2023.pdf) slides.
For this assignment, you will download the Worksheet 2.1: Letter of Inquiry Questionnaire from your
_text,_ [_Winning Grants Step by Step: The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful ProposalsLinks to an external site._](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5842957) (5th ed.). Complete questions 2-9 (2-3 sentences each) by typing your responses directly into the worksheet and upload the completed worksheet as part of your assignment.
Next, use the worksheet to write a formal letter of inquiry. Address your cover letter to Mary Smith, PhD, as provided in the Sample Letter of Inquiry on page 25 in your textbook. Be sure to cite properly, according to APA standards, when you pull information from another source.
**Note:** You will use your responses from this worksheet to craft the final letter of inquiry that will be included in your grant proposal/final project in Week 6.
**Submission Requirements**
The Letter of Inquiry paper
· must include a completed copy of worksheet 2.1
· a cover page is not necessary
· must utilize academic voice.
· Review the
[_Academic VoiceLinks to an external site._](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.
· must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s
[_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.
· must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.
· Refer to the
[_APA: Formatting Your References List_ Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
Carefully review the
[Grading RubricLinks to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/37350/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Step 2—Developing Relationships with Funders 25
Sample Letter of Inquiry
Date
Ms. Wendy Wonder
President
Future Foundation
0000 Clinton Avenue, Suite 2330
Anytown, Any State 02009
Dear Ms. Wonder:
As follow-up to my recent conversation with Lisa Bryant, I am pleased to submit this Letter of Inquiry
for Alyson Eats for your consideration. We are respectfully requesting a general support grant of $50,000
for our comprehensive programs to address hunger and food insecurity in some of our community’s most
underserved areas.
Since 2004, Alyson Eats has sought to ease the suffering of some of the approximately 130,000 residents
of Alyson who are experiencing or at risk for hunger. Our objective over the coming year is to provide more
than 200,000 nutritious meals to hungry children and adults on Alyson’s south side.
Alyson Eats will engage our nine staff members (five are part-time), our 50 regular volunteers, and our
corporate and other institutional partners across the city to conduct three proven programs to address
hunger: our food pantry and distribution service, which will distribute approximately 9,000 boxes of food
this year; a summer-time program that will provide meals to about 1,000 children who normally get free
lunch at school; and an outreach program to recruit and engage donors of food and funds, as well as vol-
unteers, with a goal this year of recruiting 15 new volunteers and generating 4,500 additional hours of
volunteer engagement. We will also pilot a new program to equip teenagers with the skills to eat health-
fully and affordably for life, beginning with a class of 30 young people. The Fiscal Year 2020 budget of
Alyson Eats is $1,352,016. We have secured commitments for about 85 percent of our budget.
Thank you for inviting Alyson Eats to submit this Letter of Inquiry. Because of our shared commitment to
building a better future for families struggling with poverty in our state, we hope that the Future Founda-
tion will invite a full proposal for $50,000 in general operating support for the one-year period beginning
January 1. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (111) 111–1111.
Sincerely,
Shawna Jones
Executive Director
Now that a sample LOI has been presented and reviewed, take the time
to answer the questions in Worksheet 2.1. This exercise will help in develop-
ing a strong letter of inquiry for funders. If you cannot clearly and succinctly
answer the questions, that probably means you need to gather more infor-
mation before you can effectively complete an LOI.
O'Neal-McElrath, Tori, et al. Winning Grants Step by Step : The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful Proposals, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated,
2019. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5842957.
Created from ashford-ebooks on 2025-04-24 02:44:37.
C
op
yr
ig
ht
©
2
01
9.
J
oh
n
W
ile
y
&
S
on
s,
In
co
rp
or
at
ed
. A
ll
rig
ht
s
re
se
rv
ed
.
## image1.emf
26 Winning Grants Step by Step
•On the
Web
WORKSHEET 2.1:
Letter of Inquiry Questionnaire
1. What is the purpose of this letter of inquiry? To whom is it being sent, and what is the
connection?
2. Is the name of the program and amount of the request clearly stated in the first paragraph?
3. What year was the organization founded? What is the mission of the organization?
4. What are the long-term goals for the organization? What programs does the organization conduct
that support these goals?
5. What is the need in the community that you seek funding to address? What population and or
geographic areas does the program serve?
6. Is the need the proposed program intends to meet clear? Are some preliminary data included to
support the need for the proposed program?
7. What does the organization propose to do about this need and what success has it had
in the past?
8. What outcomes does the organization and/or its program(s) anticipate reaching over the
next year?
9. Is program implementation briefly described?
10. Is the “fit” or natural connection between the organization’s program and the funder’s priority
areas, as identified in their guidelines, included?
11. What is the total cost of the proposed idea for the requested year, or what is the cost to expand the
current program? (Or multiple years if you plan to request multiple-year funding?) If there is some
funding already committed to the project, is it mentioned?
12. How much is being requested from the funder, for what time period, and how will it be used?
13. Is the program’s contact person clearly identified, including all contact information?
Winning Grants Step by Step, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
O'Neal-McElrath, Tori, et al. Winning Grants Step by Step : The Complete Workbook for Planning, Developing, and Writing Successful Proposals, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated,
2019. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5842957.
Created from ashford-ebooks on 2025-04-24 02:43:41.
C
op
yr
ig
ht
©
2
01
9.
J
oh
n
W
ile
y
&
S
on
s,
In
co
rp
or
at
ed
. A
ll
rig
ht
s
re
se
rv
ed
.
## image2.emf
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering discussion post.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
Assignment Please the instruction careful and follow it. No Copy and paste and No AI. Not sure. Send me a message. Thanks – [\ \ Week4_Assignment5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week4-assignment5-pdf "Week4_Assignment5.pdf") – [\ \ Week4_LearningResources_TheoriesofPersonality-Spring20…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment
Please the instruction careful and follow it. No Copy and paste and No AI. Not sure. Send me a message. Thanks
– [\
\
Week4_Assignment5.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week4-assignment5-pdf "Week4_Assignment5.pdf")
– [\
\
Week4_LearningResources_TheoriesofPersonality-Spring20255.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week4-learningresources-theoriesofpersonality-spring20255-pdf "Week4_LearningResources_TheoriesofPersonality-Spring20255.pdf")
– a year ago
Please see attachment – a year ago **files (1)** – StatementofNeedPaper.docx **StatementofNeedPaper.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/statementofneedpaper-docx) **StatementofNeedPaper.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Please see attachment
– a year ago
**files (1)**
– StatementofNeedPaper.docx
**StatementofNeedPaper.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/statementofneedpaper-docx)
**StatementofNeedPaper.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/statementofneedpaper-docx)