Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Week 8 discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Complete total of 5 tables plus case study. Use evidenced based practice and APA format. Due in 24 hours – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Week8DiscussionPartI.docx **## Week8DiscussionPartI.docx** **Week 8 Discussion Part I** **Table 1** **Common Causes of Unintentional Injury-Related Death by Age**…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Complete total of 5 tables plus case study. Use evidenced based practice and APA format. Due in 24 hours

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week8DiscussionPartI.docx

    **## Week8DiscussionPartI.docx**

    **Week 8 Discussion Part I**

    **Table 1**

    **Common Causes of Unintentional Injury-Related Death by Age**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Age | Mechanism of Injury Death <br>(write top 3) | Anticipatory Guidance |
    | Infants | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |
    | Ages 1-4 | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |
    | Ages 5-12 | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |
    | Ages 13-19 | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |

    **Table 2**

    **Genetic Conditions**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Distinguish between the following: | |
    | | Klinefelter Syndrome | Turner’s Syndrome | Down Syndrome | Fragile X |
    | Occurrence | | | | |
    | Affects males or females? | | | | |
    | Chromosome Makeup | | | | |
    | Typical Appearance | | | | |
    | Associated Health Problems | | | | |

    **Table 3**

    **Drug Therapy for Common Mental Health Conditions in Childhood**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Drug Therapy for Common Mental Health Conditions in Childhood |
    | Drug Class | Conditions Treated | Drug Interactions? | Common Side Effects |
    | SSRI <br>(Provide Examples) | | | |
    | Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor <br>(Provide Examples) | | | |
    | Second Generation Antipsychotic<br>(Provide Examples) | | | |

    *
    **Please remember to look at your patient’s allergies and medication list as some routine medications prescribed for pediatric patients may have detrimental side effects on mental health.** For example, patients newly prescribed Accutane may present with symptoms of depression or SI and should be monitored closely.

    **Table 4**

    **Child Maltreatment**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Fill in the following. |
    | Description | |
    | Prevalence | |
    | Risk Factors | |
    | Behavioral Signs | |

    **Table 5**

    **Common Eating Disorders**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | Anorexia | Bulimia |
    | Description (include 2 types) | | |
    | Risk Factors | | |
    | Clinical presentation | | |
    | Diagnostic Criteria (include 8) | | |
    | Diagnostic Studies | | |
    | Treatment/Management | | |
    | Complications | | |

    Case Scenario 4: During a well-child exam for Jimmy, an 18-month-old, you notice that he is playing with the window blinds, pushing them slightly, and then watching them sway back and forth. He avoids eye contact, flaps his hands in excitement, and only says a few words. His mother is concerned that he may have autism. There are two other family members on the mother’s side who were diagnosed with mental retardation during early childhood.

    · What more should you know about the family history?

    · What tools and diagnostic tests should you consider and why?

    · How should you manage this child’s condition?

    **## Week8DiscussionPartI.docx**

    **Week 8 Discussion Part I**

    **Table 1**

    **Common Causes of Unintentional Injury-Related Death by Age**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Age | Mechanism of Injury Death <br>(write top 3) | Anticipatory Guidance |
    | Infants | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |
    | Ages 1-4 | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |
    | Ages 5-12 | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |
    | Ages 13-19 | 1.<br>2.<br>3. | |

    **Table 2**

    **Genetic Conditions**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Distinguish between the following: | |
    | | Klinefelter Syndrome | Turner’s Syndrome | Down Syndrome | Fragile X |
    | Occurrence | | | | |
    | Affects males or females? | | | | |
    | Chromosome Makeup | | | | |
    | Typical Appearance | | | | |
    | Associated Health Problems | | | | |

    **Table 3**

    **Drug Therapy for Common Mental Health Conditions in Childhood**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Drug Therapy for Common Mental Health Conditions in Childhood |
    | Drug Class | Conditions Treated | Drug Interactions? | Common Side Effects |
    | SSRI <br>(Provide Examples) | | | |
    | Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor <br>(Provide Examples) | | | |
    | Second Generation Antipsychotic<br>(Provide Examples) | | | |

    *
    **Please remember to look at your patient’s allergies and medication list as some routine medications prescribed for pediatric patients may have detrimental side effects on mental health.** For example, patients newly prescribed Accutane may present with symptoms of depression or SI and should be monitored closely.

    **Table 4**

    **Child Maltreatment**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Fill in the following. |
    | Description | |
    | Prevalence | |
    | Risk Factors | |
    | Behavioral Signs | |

    **Table 5**

    **Common Eating Disorders**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | Anorexia | Bulimia |
    | Description (include 2 types) | | |
    | Risk Factors | | |
    | Clinical presentation | | |
    | Diagnostic Criteria (include 8) | | |
    | Diagnostic Studies | | |
    | Treatment/Management | | |
    | Complications | | |

    Case Scenario 4: During a well-child exam for Jimmy, an 18-month-old, you notice that he is playing with the window blinds, pushing them slightly, and then watching them sway back and forth. He avoids eye contact, flaps his hands in excitement, and only says a few words. His mother is concerned that he may have autism. There are two other family members on the mother’s side who were diagnosed with mental retardation during early childhood.

    · What more should you know about the family history?

    · What tools and diagnostic tests should you consider and why?

    · How should you manage this child’s condition?

  • [Solved] Measuring Performance

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) Select one of the following options for your discussion post this week. Option 1: There is an adage in business that says, “You get what you measure.” This suggests that we must carefully monitor performance-t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    Select one of the following options for your discussion post this week.

    Option 1:

    There is an adage in business that says, “You get what you measure.” This suggests that we must carefully monitor performance-tracking metrics if we want to improve business results like increasing productivity, mitigating costs, or improving employee engagement.

    – What is an important performance tracking metric that your company uses, and what is the likely business result they are trying to influence (such as increasing revenue, lowering costs, managing risks, etc.)?
    – Briefly describe how your company calculates and communicates this metric, and share your opinion on the extent to which this performance tracking is helping to improve business results.
    – Share your ideas on how else the company could improve this performance-tracking process.

    **OR**

    Option 2:

    Continuing with the same company you selected in Week 2, consider how financial metrics are utilized to report on performance and how these align with the company's strategic goals.

    Focusing on one of the following metrics – ROA, ROE, FCF, ROIC, Operating Margins, or Profit Margins – respond to the following:

    – How do the company’s stated key metrics align with its strategic objectives to influence outcomes like revenue growth, cost reduction, risk management, or operational efficiency?
    – How can advancements in AI and other technologies help leaders better manage their organization’s key metrics?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] sustainable

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    development – 2 years ago **files (6)** – ## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf – ## reserachmethodstypology.docx – ## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx – ## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf – SustainableDevelopment.pdf – How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf** KEYELEMENTSOF…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    development

    – 2 years ago

    **files (6)**

    – ## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf

    – ## reserachmethodstypology.docx

    – ## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx

    – ## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf

    – SustainableDevelopment.pdf
    – How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf

    **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf**

    KEYELEMENTSOFA:

    RESEARCH
    PROPOSAL

    ASKYOURSELF

    •Whatdoyouwanttodo?
    Whydoyouwanttodoit?
    Howyouproposetodoit.

    TITLE&
    INTRODUCTION

    •Ensureaclear&
    memorabletitle.

    Providesthebackground
    ofyourproject.
    •Describe&explainthe
    problemstatement.

    PROBLEM
    STATEMENT
    &SIGNIFICANCE

    •Highlight&describekey
    featuresoftheproblem.

    •Beexplicitinyour
    descriptionofthe
    researchquestion,
    objectives,orhypothesis.
    Emphasizethepurpose&
    benefitsofthestudy.
    Justifyhowyourproject
    contributestothebodyof
    knowledge.

    RESEARCH
    DESIGN&DATA
    COLLECTION

    •Describeyourproposed
    design&rationale.
    •Itmustsatisfytheaimof
    thestudy.
    •Clarifyhowyouaimto
    findyoursample&collect
    yourdata.
    Languageisfuturetense;
    thisiswhatyouintendto
    do.

    TIMELINE

    •Indicateyourstart&finish
    dates.
    •Chronologicallylistthe
    majorphasesofthe
    project.
    Usethistobreakdown

    thesephases.

    LITERATURE
    REVIEW

    •Theculminationofall
    yourscrutinized
    research.
    •Demonstratea
    thoughtfulsynthesisof
    thismaterial.
    •Emphasizeyourkey
    constructs.
    Showthestateof
    currentknowledgein
    relationtoyour
    problem.

    DATAANALYSIS

    •Focusontheprocess:
    record,transcribe.
    extrapolatethemes.
    Discusswhethermanual
    ordigital&why.
    •Plantimetolearndigital
    applications&processes.

    RESOURCES
    REQUIRED

    •Includespeople,services
    equipment.
    •Anyresearcher'stime.
    travel&accommodation

    •Purchasingofsoftware.
    •Transcriptionword
    processing,orgraphicart
    services

    THE
    DALE
    METHOD

    Formoredetails,youmayvisitwww.thethesiscoach.com.

    **## reserachmethodstypology.docx**

    You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.

    I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.

    Because it's challenging to understand them all.

    It requires many skills. Like:

    → Data analysis
    → Critical thinking
    → Experimental design
    → Statistical interpretation

    All part of conducting great research.

    Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.

    Here are 5 key branches of research methods:

    → Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
    → Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
    → Mixed Methods (combining both)
    → Experimental (testing cause-effect)
    → Observational (watching without interference)

    A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.

    Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.

    Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:

    1. Research question (what you want to explore)
    2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
    3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
    4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
    5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)

    I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.

    And for as much depth and context as my data allows.

    Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:

    1. Ethnography
    2. Case Study
    3. Phenomenology
    4. Grounded Theory
    5. Content Analysis
    6. Action Research
    7. Historical Research

    Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.

    It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.

    Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.

    It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.

    What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?

    [hashtag#research](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=research&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#methodology](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=methodology&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#academicwriting](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=academicwriting&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288)

    Activate to view larger image,

    ![No alternative text description for this image](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/sustainable-20901391)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx**

    **Elements of term research paper**

    When crafting a research term paper for a graduate-level international political economy (IPE) course, you should aim for a structured and rigorous approach. Here's a breakdown of essential components:

    **1. Introduction:**

    ·
    **Clearly Defined Research Question:**

    · This is the cornerstone. It should be specific, relevant to IPE, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the field.

    · It should ask "why" or "how" rather than simply "what."

    ·
    **Background and Significance:**

    · Provide context for your research question. Why is it important? What are its real-world implications?

    · Briefly review relevant existing literature to highlight the gaps your research will address.

    ·
    **Hypothesis Statement:**

    · A concise statement of your main argument or finding. It should provide a clear answer to your research question.

    ·
    **Outline of the Paper:**

    · Give the reader a roadmap of what to expect in the subsequent sections.

    **2. Literature Review:**

    ·
    **Comprehensive Overview:**

    · Demonstrate your understanding of key theories, concepts, and debates.

    · Critically analyze existing research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

    ·
    **Theoretical Framework:**

    · Explicitly state the theoretical perspective(s) guiding your research.

    · Explain how your chosen framework informs your research question and analysis.

    **3. Methodology:**

    ·
    **Research Design:**

    · Clearly describe your research approach (e.g., case study, comparative analysis, quantitative analysis).

    · Explain your data sources and how you collected them.

    ·
    **Analytical Techniques:**

    · Detail the methods you used to analyze your data.

    · Justify your methodological choices.

    ·
    **Potential Limitations:**

    · Acknowledge any limitations of your research design or data.

    **4. Analysis:**

    ·
    **Presentation of Findings:**

    · Present your data and findings in a clear and organized manner.

    · Use tables, figures, or other visual aids as appropriate.

    ·
    **Interpretation and Discussion:**

    · Interpret your findings in relation to your research question and theoretical framework.

    · Discuss the implications of your findings for IPE theory and practice.

    ·
    **Addressing Counterarguments:**

    · Acknowledge and address alternative explanations or counterarguments.

    **5. Conclusion:**

    ·
    **Summary of Key Findings:**

    · Restate your main findings and their significance.

    ·
    **Implications for Theory and Policy:**

    · Discuss the broader implications of your research for IPE theory and policy.

    ·
    **Suggestions for Future Research:**

    · Identify areas for further research that build upon your findings.

    **Key Considerations:**

    ·
    **Academic Rigor:**

    · Maintain a high level of academic rigor throughout your paper.

    · Cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style.

    ·
    **Clarity and Coherence:**

    · Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner.

    · Ensure that your arguments flow logically.

    ·
    **Relevance to IR/IPE:**

    · Keep your focus on the interplay between politics and economics in the international arena and in the context of sustainable development.

    ·
    **Engagement with Current Issues:**

    · Where possible, tying your work into current IR debates will strengthen your paper.

    By including these components, you can produce a strong research term paper that demonstrates your understanding of the PE of SD and your ability to conduct rigorous research.

    **## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf**

    A Brief Guide To Writing A Literature
    Review

    What is a Review of the Literature?

    A “review of the literature” is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and
    researchers have written on a topic. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate
    assignment, but often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In
    writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
    have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of
    writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective,
    the problem or issue you are exploring, or your thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the
    material available, or a set of summaries.

    A literature review consists of an overview, a summary, and an evaluation (“critique”) of the
    current state of knowledge about a specific area of research. It may also include a discussion of
    methodological issues and suggestions for future research.

    Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and
    demonstrate skills in two areas:

    1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual
    and computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles, books and
    documents;

    2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased
    and valid studies.

    A literature review must do these things:

    a. be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
    developing;

    b. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known;
    c. identify areas of controversy in the literature;
    d. formulate questions that need further research.

    Why are Literature Reviews Important?

    To become an expert in any field of endeavour, you must know your field comprehensively.
    Critical reviews of state-of-the-art literature permit the professional to make informed decisions,
    to act in an expert manner, and to set policy in his or her field of expertise.

    Researchers conduct reviews of the literature to justify proposed studies, to uncover patterns of
    findings in the field, to enter into scientific debate, and to discover gaps in knowledge that lead to
    future research questions. Research reviews are often the first step toward making discoveries
    and social interventions in our society.

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Your Review of Literature

    1. Do I have a specific thesis, problem, or research question which my literature review helps to
    define?

    2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
    methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g., studies of neural pathways)? qualitative
    research (e.g., studies of loneliness among migrant workers)?

    3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
    journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What disciplinary databases am I
    searching? (e.g., nursing, psychology, sociology, medicine)?

    4. How good are my information-seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've
    found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is
    the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?

    5. Is there a specific relationship between the literature I've chosen to review and the problem
    I've formulated?

    6. Have I critically analyzed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarize authors and
    articles, or do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the material I
    cite?

    7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Each Book or Article You're Reviewing

    1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
    2. Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,

    relevance) discussed?
    3. What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem or

    issue?
    4. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
    5. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
    6. What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychoanalytic, developmental, feminist)?
    7. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
    8. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include

    literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?
    9. In a research study, how good are the three basic components of the study design (i.e.,

    population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the
    analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions
    validly based upon the data and analysis?

    10. In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples,
    rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely “proving”
    what s/he already believes?

    11. How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you “deconstruct” the flow of the
    argument to analyze if/where it breaks down?

    12. Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, and
    in what ways is it useful for theory or practice? What are its strengths and limitations?

    13. How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?

    ©2007, Dena Bain Taylor, PhD, University of Toronto

    Toronto, Canada. All rights reserved

    **SustainableDevelopment.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sustainabledevelopment-pdf-10270949)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

    **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf**

    KEYELEMENTSOFA:

    RESEARCH
    PROPOSAL

    ASKYOURSELF

    •Whatdoyouwanttodo?
    Whydoyouwanttodoit?
    Howyouproposetodoit.

    TITLE&
    INTRODUCTION

    •Ensureaclear&
    memorabletitle.

    Providesthebackground
    ofyourproject.
    •Describe&explainthe
    problemstatement.

    PROBLEM
    STATEMENT
    &SIGNIFICANCE

    •Highlight&describekey
    featuresoftheproblem.

    •Beexplicitinyour
    descriptionofthe
    researchquestion,
    objectives,orhypothesis.
    Emphasizethepurpose&
    benefitsofthestudy.
    Justifyhowyourproject
    contributestothebodyof
    knowledge.

    RESEARCH
    DESIGN&DATA
    COLLECTION

    •Describeyourproposed
    design&rationale.
    •Itmustsatisfytheaimof
    thestudy.
    •Clarifyhowyouaimto
    findyoursample&collect
    yourdata.
    Languageisfuturetense;
    thisiswhatyouintendto
    do.

    TIMELINE

    •Indicateyourstart&finish
    dates.
    •Chronologicallylistthe
    majorphasesofthe
    project.
    Usethistobreakdown

    thesephases.

    LITERATURE
    REVIEW

    •Theculminationofall
    yourscrutinized
    research.
    •Demonstratea
    thoughtfulsynthesisof
    thismaterial.
    •Emphasizeyourkey
    constructs.
    Showthestateof
    currentknowledgein
    relationtoyour
    problem.

    DATAANALYSIS

    •Focusontheprocess:
    record,transcribe.
    extrapolatethemes.
    Discusswhethermanual
    ordigital&why.
    •Plantimetolearndigital
    applications&processes.

    RESOURCES
    REQUIRED

    •Includespeople,services
    equipment.
    •Anyresearcher'stime.
    travel&accommodation

    •Purchasingofsoftware.
    •Transcriptionword
    processing,orgraphicart
    services

    THE
    DALE
    METHOD

    Formoredetails,youmayvisitwww.thethesiscoach.com.

    **## reserachmethodstypology.docx**

    You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.

    I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.

    Because it's challenging to understand them all.

    It requires many skills. Like:

    → Data analysis
    → Critical thinking
    → Experimental design
    → Statistical interpretation

    All part of conducting great research.

    Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.

    Here are 5 key branches of research methods:

    → Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
    → Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
    → Mixed Methods (combining both)
    → Experimental (testing cause-effect)
    → Observational (watching without interference)

    A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.

    Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.

    Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:

    1. Research question (what you want to explore)
    2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
    3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
    4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
    5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)

    I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.

    And for as much depth and context as my data allows.

    Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:

    1. Ethnography
    2. Case Study
    3. Phenomenology
    4. Grounded Theory
    5. Content Analysis
    6. Action Research
    7. Historical Research

    Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.

    It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.

    Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.

    It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.

    What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?

    [hashtag#research](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=research&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#methodology](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=methodology&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#academicwriting](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=academicwriting&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288)

    Activate to view larger image,

    ![No alternative text description for this image](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/sustainable-20901391)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx**

    **Elements of term research paper**

    When crafting a research term paper for a graduate-level international political economy (IPE) course, you should aim for a structured and rigorous approach. Here's a breakdown of essential components:

    **1. Introduction:**

    ·
    **Clearly Defined Research Question:**

    · This is the cornerstone. It should be specific, relevant to IPE, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the field.

    · It should ask "why" or "how" rather than simply "what."

    ·
    **Background and Significance:**

    · Provide context for your research question. Why is it important? What are its real-world implications?

    · Briefly review relevant existing literature to highlight the gaps your research will address.

    ·
    **Hypothesis Statement:**

    · A concise statement of your main argument or finding. It should provide a clear answer to your research question.

    ·
    **Outline of the Paper:**

    · Give the reader a roadmap of what to expect in the subsequent sections.

    **2. Literature Review:**

    ·
    **Comprehensive Overview:**

    · Demonstrate your understanding of key theories, concepts, and debates.

    · Critically analyze existing research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

    ·
    **Theoretical Framework:**

    · Explicitly state the theoretical perspective(s) guiding your research.

    · Explain how your chosen framework informs your research question and analysis.

    **3. Methodology:**

    ·
    **Research Design:**

    · Clearly describe your research approach (e.g., case study, comparative analysis, quantitative analysis).

    · Explain your data sources and how you collected them.

    ·
    **Analytical Techniques:**

    · Detail the methods you used to analyze your data.

    · Justify your methodological choices.

    ·
    **Potential Limitations:**

    · Acknowledge any limitations of your research design or data.

    **4. Analysis:**

    ·
    **Presentation of Findings:**

    · Present your data and findings in a clear and organized manner.

    · Use tables, figures, or other visual aids as appropriate.

    ·
    **Interpretation and Discussion:**

    · Interpret your findings in relation to your research question and theoretical framework.

    · Discuss the implications of your findings for IPE theory and practice.

    ·
    **Addressing Counterarguments:**

    · Acknowledge and address alternative explanations or counterarguments.

    **5. Conclusion:**

    ·
    **Summary of Key Findings:**

    · Restate your main findings and their significance.

    ·
    **Implications for Theory and Policy:**

    · Discuss the broader implications of your research for IPE theory and policy.

    ·
    **Suggestions for Future Research:**

    · Identify areas for further research that build upon your findings.

    **Key Considerations:**

    ·
    **Academic Rigor:**

    · Maintain a high level of academic rigor throughout your paper.

    · Cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style.

    ·
    **Clarity and Coherence:**

    · Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner.

    · Ensure that your arguments flow logically.

    ·
    **Relevance to IR/IPE:**

    · Keep your focus on the interplay between politics and economics in the international arena and in the context of sustainable development.

    ·
    **Engagement with Current Issues:**

    · Where possible, tying your work into current IR debates will strengthen your paper.

    By including these components, you can produce a strong research term paper that demonstrates your understanding of the PE of SD and your ability to conduct rigorous research.

    **## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf**

    A Brief Guide To Writing A Literature
    Review

    What is a Review of the Literature?

    A “review of the literature” is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and
    researchers have written on a topic. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate
    assignment, but often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In
    writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
    have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of
    writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective,
    the problem or issue you are exploring, or your thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the
    material available, or a set of summaries.

    A literature review consists of an overview, a summary, and an evaluation (“critique”) of the
    current state of knowledge about a specific area of research. It may also include a discussion of
    methodological issues and suggestions for future research.

    Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and
    demonstrate skills in two areas:

    1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual
    and computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles, books and
    documents;

    2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased
    and valid studies.

    A literature review must do these things:

    a. be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
    developing;

    b. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known;
    c. identify areas of controversy in the literature;
    d. formulate questions that need further research.

    Why are Literature Reviews Important?

    To become an expert in any field of endeavour, you must know your field comprehensively.
    Critical reviews of state-of-the-art literature permit the professional to make informed decisions,
    to act in an expert manner, and to set policy in his or her field of expertise.

    Researchers conduct reviews of the literature to justify proposed studies, to uncover patterns of
    findings in the field, to enter into scientific debate, and to discover gaps in knowledge that lead to
    future research questions. Research reviews are often the first step toward making discoveries
    and social interventions in our society.

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Your Review of Literature

    1. Do I have a specific thesis, problem, or research question which my literature review helps to
    define?

    2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
    methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g., studies of neural pathways)? qualitative
    research (e.g., studies of loneliness among migrant workers)?

    3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
    journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What disciplinary databases am I
    searching? (e.g., nursing, psychology, sociology, medicine)?

    4. How good are my information-seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've
    found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is
    the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?

    5. Is there a specific relationship between the literature I've chosen to review and the problem
    I've formulated?

    6. Have I critically analyzed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarize authors and
    articles, or do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the material I
    cite?

    7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Each Book or Article You're Reviewing

    1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
    2. Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,

    relevance) discussed?
    3. What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem or

    issue?
    4. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
    5. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
    6. What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychoanalytic, developmental, feminist)?
    7. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
    8. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include

    literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?
    9. In a research study, how good are the three basic components of the study design (i.e.,

    population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the
    analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions
    validly based upon the data and analysis?

    10. In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples,
    rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely “proving”
    what s/he already believes?

    11. How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you “deconstruct” the flow of the
    argument to analyze if/where it breaks down?

    12. Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, and
    in what ways is it useful for theory or practice? What are its strengths and limitations?

    13. How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?

    ©2007, Dena Bain Taylor, PhD, University of Toronto

    Toronto, Canada. All rights reserved

    **SustainableDevelopment.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sustainabledevelopment-pdf-10270949)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

    **## elementsofresearchproposal.pdf**

    KEYELEMENTSOFA:

    RESEARCH
    PROPOSAL

    ASKYOURSELF

    •Whatdoyouwanttodo?
    Whydoyouwanttodoit?
    Howyouproposetodoit.

    TITLE&
    INTRODUCTION

    •Ensureaclear&
    memorabletitle.

    Providesthebackground
    ofyourproject.
    •Describe&explainthe
    problemstatement.

    PROBLEM
    STATEMENT
    &SIGNIFICANCE

    •Highlight&describekey
    featuresoftheproblem.

    •Beexplicitinyour
    descriptionofthe
    researchquestion,
    objectives,orhypothesis.
    Emphasizethepurpose&
    benefitsofthestudy.
    Justifyhowyourproject
    contributestothebodyof
    knowledge.

    RESEARCH
    DESIGN&DATA
    COLLECTION

    •Describeyourproposed
    design&rationale.
    •Itmustsatisfytheaimof
    thestudy.
    •Clarifyhowyouaimto
    findyoursample&collect
    yourdata.
    Languageisfuturetense;
    thisiswhatyouintendto
    do.

    TIMELINE

    •Indicateyourstart&finish
    dates.
    •Chronologicallylistthe
    majorphasesofthe
    project.
    Usethistobreakdown

    thesephases.

    LITERATURE
    REVIEW

    •Theculminationofall
    yourscrutinized
    research.
    •Demonstratea
    thoughtfulsynthesisof
    thismaterial.
    •Emphasizeyourkey
    constructs.
    Showthestateof
    currentknowledgein
    relationtoyour
    problem.

    DATAANALYSIS

    •Focusontheprocess:
    record,transcribe.
    extrapolatethemes.
    Discusswhethermanual
    ordigital&why.
    •Plantimetolearndigital
    applications&processes.

    RESOURCES
    REQUIRED

    •Includespeople,services
    equipment.
    •Anyresearcher'stime.
    travel&accommodation

    •Purchasingofsoftware.
    •Transcriptionword
    processing,orgraphicart
    services

    THE
    DALE
    METHOD

    Formoredetails,youmayvisitwww.thethesiscoach.com.

    **## reserachmethodstypology.docx**

    You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.

    I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.

    Because it's challenging to understand them all.

    It requires many skills. Like:

    → Data analysis
    → Critical thinking
    → Experimental design
    → Statistical interpretation

    All part of conducting great research.

    Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.

    Here are 5 key branches of research methods:

    → Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
    → Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
    → Mixed Methods (combining both)
    → Experimental (testing cause-effect)
    → Observational (watching without interference)

    A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.

    Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.

    Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:

    1. Research question (what you want to explore)
    2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
    3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
    4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
    5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)

    I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.

    And for as much depth and context as my data allows.

    Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:

    1. Ethnography
    2. Case Study
    3. Phenomenology
    4. Grounded Theory
    5. Content Analysis
    6. Action Research
    7. Historical Research

    Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.

    It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.

    Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.

    It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.

    What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?

    [hashtag#research](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=research&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#methodology](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=methodology&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288) [hashtag#academicwriting](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=academicwriting&highlightedUpdateUrns=urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7251203882750476288)

    Activate to view larger image,

    ![No alternative text description for this image](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/sustainable-20901391)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## Elementsoftermresearchpaper.docx**

    **Elements of term research paper**

    When crafting a research term paper for a graduate-level international political economy (IPE) course, you should aim for a structured and rigorous approach. Here's a breakdown of essential components:

    **1. Introduction:**

    ·
    **Clearly Defined Research Question:**

    · This is the cornerstone. It should be specific, relevant to IPE, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the field.

    · It should ask "why" or "how" rather than simply "what."

    ·
    **Background and Significance:**

    · Provide context for your research question. Why is it important? What are its real-world implications?

    · Briefly review relevant existing literature to highlight the gaps your research will address.

    ·
    **Hypothesis Statement:**

    · A concise statement of your main argument or finding. It should provide a clear answer to your research question.

    ·
    **Outline of the Paper:**

    · Give the reader a roadmap of what to expect in the subsequent sections.

    **2. Literature Review:**

    ·
    **Comprehensive Overview:**

    · Demonstrate your understanding of key theories, concepts, and debates.

    · Critically analyze existing research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.

    ·
    **Theoretical Framework:**

    · Explicitly state the theoretical perspective(s) guiding your research.

    · Explain how your chosen framework informs your research question and analysis.

    **3. Methodology:**

    ·
    **Research Design:**

    · Clearly describe your research approach (e.g., case study, comparative analysis, quantitative analysis).

    · Explain your data sources and how you collected them.

    ·
    **Analytical Techniques:**

    · Detail the methods you used to analyze your data.

    · Justify your methodological choices.

    ·
    **Potential Limitations:**

    · Acknowledge any limitations of your research design or data.

    **4. Analysis:**

    ·
    **Presentation of Findings:**

    · Present your data and findings in a clear and organized manner.

    · Use tables, figures, or other visual aids as appropriate.

    ·
    **Interpretation and Discussion:**

    · Interpret your findings in relation to your research question and theoretical framework.

    · Discuss the implications of your findings for IPE theory and practice.

    ·
    **Addressing Counterarguments:**

    · Acknowledge and address alternative explanations or counterarguments.

    **5. Conclusion:**

    ·
    **Summary of Key Findings:**

    · Restate your main findings and their significance.

    ·
    **Implications for Theory and Policy:**

    · Discuss the broader implications of your research for IPE theory and policy.

    ·
    **Suggestions for Future Research:**

    · Identify areas for further research that build upon your findings.

    **Key Considerations:**

    ·
    **Academic Rigor:**

    · Maintain a high level of academic rigor throughout your paper.

    · Cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style.

    ·
    **Clarity and Coherence:**

    · Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner.

    · Ensure that your arguments flow logically.

    ·
    **Relevance to IR/IPE:**

    · Keep your focus on the interplay between politics and economics in the international arena and in the context of sustainable development.

    ·
    **Engagement with Current Issues:**

    · Where possible, tying your work into current IR debates will strengthen your paper.

    By including these components, you can produce a strong research term paper that demonstrates your understanding of the PE of SD and your ability to conduct rigorous research.

    **## literaturereviewarticle2.pdf**

    A Brief Guide To Writing A Literature
    Review

    What is a Review of the Literature?

    A “review of the literature” is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and
    researchers have written on a topic. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate
    assignment, but often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In
    writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas
    have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of
    writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective,
    the problem or issue you are exploring, or your thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the
    material available, or a set of summaries.

    A literature review consists of an overview, a summary, and an evaluation (“critique”) of the
    current state of knowledge about a specific area of research. It may also include a discussion of
    methodological issues and suggestions for future research.

    Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and
    demonstrate skills in two areas:

    1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual
    and computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles, books and
    documents;

    2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased
    and valid studies.

    A literature review must do these things:

    a. be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
    developing;

    b. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known;
    c. identify areas of controversy in the literature;
    d. formulate questions that need further research.

    Why are Literature Reviews Important?

    To become an expert in any field of endeavour, you must know your field comprehensively.
    Critical reviews of state-of-the-art literature permit the professional to make informed decisions,
    to act in an expert manner, and to set policy in his or her field of expertise.

    Researchers conduct reviews of the literature to justify proposed studies, to uncover patterns of
    findings in the field, to enter into scientific debate, and to discover gaps in knowledge that lead to
    future research questions. Research reviews are often the first step toward making discoveries
    and social interventions in our society.

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Your Review of Literature

    1. Do I have a specific thesis, problem, or research question which my literature review helps to
    define?

    2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
    methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g., studies of neural pathways)? qualitative
    research (e.g., studies of loneliness among migrant workers)?

    3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
    journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What disciplinary databases am I
    searching? (e.g., nursing, psychology, sociology, medicine)?

    4. How good are my information-seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I've
    found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is
    the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper?

    5. Is there a specific relationship between the literature I've chosen to review and the problem
    I've formulated?

    6. Have I critically analyzed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarize authors and
    articles, or do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the material I
    cite?

    7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?

    Questions to Ask Yourself About
    Each Book or Article You're Reviewing

    1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
    2. Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,

    relevance) discussed?
    3. What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem or

    issue?
    4. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
    5. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
    6. What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychoanalytic, developmental, feminist)?
    7. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
    8. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include

    literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?
    9. In a research study, how good are the three basic components of the study design (i.e.,

    population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the
    analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions
    validly based upon the data and analysis?

    10. In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples,
    rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely “proving”
    what s/he already believes?

    11. How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you “deconstruct” the flow of the
    argument to analyze if/where it breaks down?

    12. Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, and
    in what ways is it useful for theory or practice? What are its strengths and limitations?

    13. How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?

    ©2007, Dena Bain Taylor, PhD, University of Toronto

    Toronto, Canada. All rights reserved

    **SustainableDevelopment.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sustainabledevelopment-pdf-10270949)

    **How_to_Write_a_Thesis_ColU.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/how-to-write-a-thesis-colu-pdf)

  • [Solved] Case study 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) ## The Power of People: The Case of the Cayuga Collection _Andrea Bonilla, Co-founder and Vice President, Cayuga Collection._ _Photographed in Costa Rica by Mike Dell. Used by permission from Cayuga Collection…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    ## The Power of People: The Case of the Cayuga Collection

    _Andrea Bonilla, Co-founder and Vice President, Cayuga Collection._

    _Photographed in Costa Rica by Mike Dell. Used by permission from Cayuga Collection._

    The Cayuga Collection is an excellent example of how an organization can exert power and influence to positively impact its employees, customers, and the community at large. While the name _Cayuga_ comes from Cayuga Lake in Ithaca, New York where its two founders went to school at Cornell University, _The Cayuga Way_ means “travel done differently” and also “travel done inclusively.” Founded in 1999 by Hans Pfister and Andrea Bonilla, the Cayuga Collection offers luxury vacation properties while supporting sustainable practices. Since that time, the company has opened up multiple new markets and has grown to include over 400 staff members across three countries, including Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Panama. They specialize in properties with no more than 50 rooms, focus on the luxury segment of the market, and have a strong commitment to sustainability, evidenced by the 1,500+ acres of rainforest that they protect. What is the key to the company’s success? According to the founders, it’s not simply an innovative approach to sustainable luxury vacations. More importantly, it’s “all about the people.”

    The Cayuga Collection is a pioneer in the area of eco-tourism, largely due to their ingenious solutions grounded in the power of people who know the area best—the locals who live there and make up the community. When they began, they focused more on the efficient use of resources and conserving the natural environment. However, as the tourism industry shifted toward sustainability, the Cayuga Collection began to realize that, without “buy-in” from staff and the local communities where their properties reside, their sustainability efforts were not going to be effective. From design solutions, building, and infrastructure, to the day-to-day operations, the Cayuga Collection leads and learns from the people around them. They are continually asking, “How can we make this even better?” and have learned that good ideas come from within. They created the Cayuga Innovation Contest to tap into the collective knowledge of their 400+ staff members and to date have come up with 65 actionable innovative ideas to help blend luxury and sustainability. The team of passionate men and women dedicated to _The Cayuga Way_ has greatly contributed to the success of the company.

    Due to their innovation and success, the Cayuga Collection has garnered worldwide acclaim. Their hotels have seen famous guests such as Nobel prize winners, CEOs, politicians, and celebrities like Charlize Theron. In 2010 they won the _World Saver Award_ from Condé Nast _Traveler_ and _Travel + Leisure_’s Global Vision Award in the _Environmental Leadership_ category. They were also honored with the 2017 National Geographic World Legacy Award in the category of _Earth Changers,_ recognizing their cutting-edge leadership in environmentally friendly business practices and green technology. In 2018, The World Travel & Tourism Council awarded Cayuga the Tourism for Tomorrow Award in the _People_ category.

    By creating authentic and truly meaningful experiences for their guests, the Cayuga Collection persuades people to think differently about what “luxury” means. As co-founder and Vice President Andrea Bonilla says, “It’s about creating awareness. When guests come to our properties, for example, our staff needs to be able to show them that the luxury they are receiving there is not about things. It’s about people. Connecting with the land, learning new ways to connect with the environment around you, and connecting creates a unique vision and everyone wants to work towards the same goal.”

    Beyond empowering their employees and persuading their guests to think differently about eco-tourism, the Cayuga Collection seeks to positively influence the local communities and surrounding ecosystems. For example, they buy local, toiletries that come in refillable glass containers and include products produced in Costa Rica, and they’ve banned all single-use plastics from their properties. They’ve also created smart solutions for irrigating their verdant hotel grounds. Finally, they run programs to help local schools and communities.

    Part of the power of the Cayuga approach is one of persuading people to think differently than they normally do about what luxury means. Cayuga also attempts to get people to think differently about what eco-tourism means since their properties are all located in remote destinations that mainly require flights to reach them.

    By buying locally, employing locals, and establishing programs that benefit local communities and ecosystems, the Cayuga Collection has built a successful enterprise. More importantly, however, they have demonstrated how power and influence can be used for good.

    _**Multimedia Extension—The Cayuga Way: Our Sustainable Philosophy**_

    [https://youtu.be/uSbbW53m4YoLinks to an external site.](https://youtu.be/uSbbW53m4Yo)

    ### Case Discussion Questions

    1. The Cayuga Collection places great value on feedback and insight from employees. What unique perspective can employees provide that might not necessarily be available from an outside party?
    2. The Cayuga Collection has won numerous awards while also attracting high-profile guests. What are some other metrics that could be used to quantify this organization’s success?
    3. The Cayuga Collection has become successful by simultaneously prioritizing people, profit, and the planet, also known as the “triple bottom line” approach. In your opinion, what are some of the barriers organizations may face when attempting to adopt this approach?
    4. If you were the CEO of the Cayuga Collection, would you, in any way, try to redefine what it means to do business “The Cayuga Way”? If so, please describe the changes you would make.
    5. The Cayuga Collection focuses on the luxury segment of the market. Do you think their model could be implemented in non-luxury vacation markets? Please explain.

    **Directions:**

    1. In 3-4 pages in MS Word, conduct research and case analysis, and respond to the following questions: Using the information from the business case ( watching this video is preferable:

    [https://youtu.be/uSbbW53m4YLinks to an external site.](https://youtu.be/uSbbW53m4Yo)

    2. You are required to cite at least three internal or external sources in your postings, formatted to APA standards.  Avoid citing sources from Wikis, Wikipedia, Dictionary.com, private company websites, and other non-academic references-

    3. Utilize the Word APA Formatted template posted in the class.

    Review APA standards: [https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.](https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl)

    4. **You are required to choose 3 components out of the 5 mentioned above to complete your assignment.**

    **8. You are required to cite at least three internal or external sources in your postings, formatted to APA standards.  Avoid citing sources from Wikis, Wikipedia, Dictionary.com, private company websites, and other non-academic references.**

    **8. You are required to utilize the APA Word template designated for the Turnitin assignments in this class.**

    – [\
    \
    SampleAPAFormattoUseTemplate.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sampleapaformattousetemplate-docx "SampleAPAFormattoUseTemplate.docx")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_8491.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-8491-jpeg-10273181 "IMG_8491.jpeg")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## qeprequirement.pdf **## qeprequirement.pdf** MDC BLSON T.M. 11/2019 QEP Leadership Writing Prompt School of Nursing QEP Writing Prompt NUR 2811L (Professional Nursing Leadership NUR2811C) For this course, you will write a scholarly paper on Nursing Philosophy. Utiliz…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## qeprequirement.pdf

    **## qeprequirement.pdf**

    MDC BLSON T.M. 11/2019 QEP Leadership Writing Prompt

    School of Nursing QEP Writing Prompt

    NUR 2811L (Professional Nursing Leadership NUR2811C)
    For this course, you will write a scholarly paper on Nursing Philosophy. Utilizing the four
    domains within the nursing metaparadigm you will include the following:

    • A definition of the four domains: Nursing, Environment, Health and Person

    • Your personal definition of each domain and how these fit into your philosophy of
    nursing.

    • Compare and contrast the philosophies of Miami Dade College Benjamin Leon School of
    Nursing and at least one hospital.

    • Conclude by summarizing and reflecting on what was learned from the assignment and
    how it will impact your practice in the future.

    NUR 2811C Domains

    1. Nursing

    2. Environment

    3. Health

    4. Person

    Requirements:

    o Your paper must be APA format and at least 750 words not to exceed 1000 words.

    o Double space your paper and use Times New Roman standard 12-point font.

    o Proofread your paper; visit and present proof of seeing a writing tutor before submitting
    your paper to “Turn-it-in”.

    o A minimum of two (2) scholarly references (ex. journal articles) must be used. APA
    format must be used in citing and referencing sources.

    **## qeprequirement.pdf**

    MDC BLSON T.M. 11/2019 QEP Leadership Writing Prompt

    School of Nursing QEP Writing Prompt

    NUR 2811L (Professional Nursing Leadership NUR2811C)
    For this course, you will write a scholarly paper on Nursing Philosophy. Utilizing the four
    domains within the nursing metaparadigm you will include the following:

    • A definition of the four domains: Nursing, Environment, Health and Person

    • Your personal definition of each domain and how these fit into your philosophy of
    nursing.

    • Compare and contrast the philosophies of Miami Dade College Benjamin Leon School of
    Nursing and at least one hospital.

    • Conclude by summarizing and reflecting on what was learned from the assignment and
    how it will impact your practice in the future.

    NUR 2811C Domains

    1. Nursing

    2. Environment

    3. Health

    4. Person

    Requirements:

    o Your paper must be APA format and at least 750 words not to exceed 1000 words.

    o Double space your paper and use Times New Roman standard 12-point font.

    o Proofread your paper; visit and present proof of seeing a writing tutor before submitting
    your paper to “Turn-it-in”.

    o A minimum of two (2) scholarly references (ex. journal articles) must be used. APA
    format must be used in citing and referencing sources.

  • [Solved] assigned

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## 6008assess1.docx **## 6008assess1.docx** Write a brief 2-3 page report about a health care economic issue that you have identified. Address the reasons why you selected the issue you did; identify how this issue impacts the work of you, your colleagues, and your orga…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## 6008assess1.docx

    **## 6008assess1.docx**

    Write a brief 2-3 page report about a health care economic issue that you have identified. Address the reasons why you selected the issue you did; identify how this issue impacts the work of you, your colleagues, and your organization; and describe the gap that you see contributing to this issue.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    **Note:** Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

    Health care economics has the potential to affect each of us either personally or professionally. This impact can be viewed from a health economics point-of-view (where we discuss the value of health care and its efficiency), or it can examine how health care is financed (focus on how health care is funded). Health economics and health care funding have the potential to influence health care outcomes in a variety of ways. As you move through this course, you will work toward developing a potential solution for a health care issue within your current or desired health care system. The goal of this assessment is to identify an economic health care issue that you will address throughout the course.

    **Context and Background**

    Health care economics has the potential to affect each of us either personally or professionally. This impact can be viewed from a health economics point-of-view (where we discuss the value of health care and its efficiency) or it can examine how health care is financed (focus on how health care is funded). Health economics and health care funding have the potential to influence health care outcomes in a variety of ways. The bulleted list below outlines topics and health care issues that many institutions encounter. Organizations often have to implement strategies or initiatives to resolve or improve these issues and create positive patient and institution outcomes.

    Examples of health care economic issues:

    · The influence of health care economics on community health—for example, social determinants of health (such as access to care and health care finance).

    · Supply and demand: How do we in the health care environment exist when there are more needs from communities and patients than we have the resources to supply? An example of this would be a high number of patients and low resource levels such as staff, supplies, and equipment.

    · The public’s attitude toward health, disease, and the health care system—for example, how money is distributed has the potential to impact the health care outcomes of certain populations. An example of this would be the lack of access and funding for underserved and rural communities.

    · Other issues might include access to care, social determinants of health, senior health, food insecurity or food desserts, inadequate staffing, homelessness, rehospitalization environmental issues leading to chronic disease, et cetera.

    As you move through this course, you will work toward developing a potential solution for a health care issue within your current or desired health care system. The goal of this assessment is to identify an economic health care issue that you will address throughout the course.

    Later in the course, you will (a) conduct a needs analysis to justify your focus on this topic area using the literature of the field, (b) present an argument for change in your organization bolstered by a cost-benefit analysis, and (c) advocate for this change at the state level. Keep these future assessments in mind as you select your topic.

    **## 6008assess1.docx**

    Write a brief 2-3 page report about a health care economic issue that you have identified. Address the reasons why you selected the issue you did; identify how this issue impacts the work of you, your colleagues, and your organization; and describe the gap that you see contributing to this issue.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    **Note:** Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

    Health care economics has the potential to affect each of us either personally or professionally. This impact can be viewed from a health economics point-of-view (where we discuss the value of health care and its efficiency), or it can examine how health care is financed (focus on how health care is funded). Health economics and health care funding have the potential to influence health care outcomes in a variety of ways. As you move through this course, you will work toward developing a potential solution for a health care issue within your current or desired health care system. The goal of this assessment is to identify an economic health care issue that you will address throughout the course.

    **Context and Background**

    Health care economics has the potential to affect each of us either personally or professionally. This impact can be viewed from a health economics point-of-view (where we discuss the value of health care and its efficiency) or it can examine how health care is financed (focus on how health care is funded). Health economics and health care funding have the potential to influence health care outcomes in a variety of ways. The bulleted list below outlines topics and health care issues that many institutions encounter. Organizations often have to implement strategies or initiatives to resolve or improve these issues and create positive patient and institution outcomes.

    Examples of health care economic issues:

    · The influence of health care economics on community health—for example, social determinants of health (such as access to care and health care finance).

    · Supply and demand: How do we in the health care environment exist when there are more needs from communities and patients than we have the resources to supply? An example of this would be a high number of patients and low resource levels such as staff, supplies, and equipment.

    · The public’s attitude toward health, disease, and the health care system—for example, how money is distributed has the potential to impact the health care outcomes of certain populations. An example of this would be the lack of access and funding for underserved and rural communities.

    · Other issues might include access to care, social determinants of health, senior health, food insecurity or food desserts, inadequate staffing, homelessness, rehospitalization environmental issues leading to chronic disease, et cetera.

    As you move through this course, you will work toward developing a potential solution for a health care issue within your current or desired health care system. The goal of this assessment is to identify an economic health care issue that you will address throughout the course.

    Later in the course, you will (a) conduct a needs analysis to justify your focus on this topic area using the literature of the field, (b) present an argument for change in your organization bolstered by a cost-benefit analysis, and (c) advocate for this change at the state level. Keep these future assessments in mind as you select your topic.

  • [Solved] Psychology Can someone help me with my psychology personality homework?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    List and explain the levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Cloninger1521.ppt **## Cloninger1521.ppt** [removed] **## Cloninger1521.ppt** [removed]

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    List and explain the levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Cloninger1521.ppt

    **## Cloninger1521.ppt**

    [removed]

    **## Cloninger1521.ppt**

    [removed]

  • [Solved] RESEARCH DESIGN

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Research Design Question:** **"Are New York government administrative efforts in aiding the homeless more or less effective than nonprofit organizations?"** **The Dependent Variable (DV)** The dependent variable in this research study is the effectiveness of initiatives aimed at assisting individu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Research Design Question:**

    **"Are New York government administrative efforts in aiding the homeless more or less effective than nonprofit organizations?"**

    **The Dependent Variable (DV)**

    The dependent variable in this research study is the effectiveness of initiatives aimed at assisting individuals experiencing homelessness.

    **Part 1-**( **Case Study Research Design)**

    1) What is the purpose of a case study design?

    2)  When is this design used?

    3) Why is this design the most appropriate choice based on the research question?

    4) What are the potential weaknesses of the research design?

    **Part 2- (Qualitative Research Method)**

    1) What is the purpose of the qualitative research method?

    2)  When is this method used?

    3) Why is this method the most appropriate choice based on the research question?

    4) What are the potential weaknesses of the research method?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 5-1 Discussion: Peer Support Activity—Final Project Implementation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Begin your initial post with a one-sentence summary of your proposal topic. Then, give a brief description of the activities leading to achieving the objectives in your program proposal. It should include your rationale behind their selection, their sequence, and your reasoning behind why these meth…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Begin your initial post with a one-sentence summary of your proposal topic. Then, give a brief description of the activities leading to achieving the objectives in your program proposal. It should include your rationale behind their selection, their sequence, and your reasoning behind why these methods may work. This discussion will help you complete Milestone Five, which is due in Module Six.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Journal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached – 2 years ago – 4.5 **files (2)** – ## Journal.docx – ## UnitIV.pdf **## Journal.docx** Compose a 300-word essay addressing/answering the following questions: 1. Describe the characteristics of a cybersecurity policy. Who would create this policy? Who would be affected by it? 2. Expla…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    – 2 years ago
    – 4.5

    **files (2)**

    – ## Journal.docx

    – ## UnitIV.pdf

    **## Journal.docx**

    Compose a 300-word essay addressing/answering the following questions:

    1. Describe the characteristics of a cybersecurity policy. Who would create this policy? Who would be affected by it?

    2. Explain how cybersecurity policies can help reduce the threats to an organization. Which threats are the hardest to protect against when dealing with assets?

    3. Explain the characteristics of a successful cybersecurity policy. What needs to be in place during the creation to help with the success?

    4. How does an IS or cybersecurity policy differ from a traditional organizational policy?

    Be sure to use double spacing and paragraph format for your essay. You must use at least your textbook as a source in completing this assignment. All sources used must have proper citations and references formatted in APA Style.

    Course Textbook(s)

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780134858548

    **## UnitIV.pdf**

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    5. Show a familiarity with a wide range of substantive issues in IS security policy creation.
    5.1 Define the purpose of IT governance with policies.
    5.2 Indicate the potential risks associated with IS security.

    Reading Assignment

    Chapter 4: Governance and Risk Management

    Unit Lesson

    Governance

    Organizations usually have some form of governance in place for structure and accountability. Governance is
    the process of structuring, operating, and controlling an organization with the objectives to achieve long-term
    strategic goals, meet the interests of stakeholders, and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Think
    about the functional areas (i.e., accounting, production, and sales, service) and governance within each
    department. What governance practice does an accounting department apply to the financial data of an
    organization? How should this information be protected and used for operations? Governance encompasses
    the establishment of chains of responsibility, authority, policies, standards, and control mechanisms. It
    expresses the expectations, allocation of resources, and management of risks. In Chapter 4 of your textbook,
    you will review the issues associated with silos. The problem with silos is that each department establishes
    their own governance controls, but they do not share these structures or processes with the entire
    organization. To help with this, the information technology (IT) team can gather these structures and
    processes to build the cybersecurity responsibility of IT. However, it must be noted that each department
    performs these activities differently; consequently, it may take time, and it may come with complexities. If IT
    tries to meet regularly with the functional departments, this information can be collected and documented to
    provide a holistic IT governance model.

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    Risk Management with IS Security

    Silo-based cybersecurity example
    (Adapted from Santos, 2019)

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    IT governance refers to the increase of effectiveness of an organization through IT to align with corporate
    goals, protect IT investments, and address IT-related business challenges. The National Institute of
    Standards and Technology (NIST) (2018) defines data governance as a set of processes that ensures data
    assets are formally managed throughout the organization. This needs to be an organizational effort involving
    different functional areas to ensure the data assets are protected. IT governance establishes authority and
    management and decision-making parameters related to the data produced or managed by the enterprise
    (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018). Security policies facilitate organizational efforts to
    devise integration, help in operating performance, guarantee strategic controls, and alleviate risk
    management.

    Policy Alignment

    The development of security policies must align with organizational objectives and strategies. This should
    hold true with any information system (IS) or IT initiative. The importance of policy alignment is that it
    facilitates organizational effectiveness and efficiency, links technology and business, optimizes the business
    model, and ensures success. We can also look to the external regulations within a particular industry. Santos
    (2019) explains how regulations such as Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Health Insurance Portability and
    Accountability Act (HIPAA), Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA),
    Federal Information Systems Management Act (FISMA), and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
    (PCI DSS) relate to cybersecurity so organizations can verify their practices are in line.

    In today’s technological world, IS security is always a topic at the executive and management levels. Security
    is an expected topic of discussion among decision-makers and is given the same level of respect as other
    fundamental drivers and influencing elements of the business (Santos, 2019). In recent years, we have seen
    many organizations create chief information security officers (CISO) positions to address the cybersecurity
    concerns and threats. Why would an organization not hire a CISO (especially if they work with financial or
    healthcare data)? The CISO coordinates and manages security efforts across the company, including IT,
    human resources (HR), communications, legal, facilities management, and other groups (Santos, 2019).
    However, many organizations operate on a strict personnel budget, so hiring this position is not always a
    feasible option. The question is, how can organizations ensure their policies are up to date and sufficient if the
    role is not in place?

    Risk

    Risk can be associated with any business process or project. Think about the risks organizations take on with
    any long-term decision-making. If we implement a simple website or a large enterprise solution, then we take
    on risks. The risks can be substantial or small, depending on the probability and potential impact. We must
    understand the value of communicating and working with functional departments to help identify potential
    security risks and concerns. Therefore, we always need department involvement when identifying the risks.
    Risk is defined as “the potential of an undesirable or unfavorable outcome resulting from a given action,
    activity, and/or inaction” (Santos, 2019, p. 122). The question is then, why we even take risks. Organizations
    take on risk with IT projects because of competition, regulations, growth, or necessity. According to Santos,
    (2019) managing risk implies that other actions are being taken to either mitigate the impact of the
    undesirable or unfavorable outcome and/or enhance the likelihood of a positive outcome. Failure to assume
    any risks with new ventures can be devastating to an organization over the long term because their
    competitors are taking on new risks with innovations to meet customer demands.

    Managing Risks

    As we found, an organization will be subject to risk with any new project or process. Therefore, we have to
    manage the risks if we want to remain competitive with new projects. Managing that risk is an important part
    of the IT department in coordination with management. We can manage the risks with acceptance, mitigation,
    reduction/avoidance, or transfer or share.

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Risk Acceptance

    At first, this sounds bad. However, this strategy is acceptable, especially when there is a low probability or low
    impact of the risk. Risk acceptance indicates that the organization is willing to accept the level of risk
    associated with a given activity or process (Santos, 2019). We may accept the risk if the potential privacy
    implications are low and have little or no impact to the operations. Consider a situation where there is a
    potential for a hacker to penetrate a Web server, but the Web server is rarely used by the organization, does
    not connect to any network servers, and does not contain any sensitive data. The organization may decide to
    accept this risk instead of building additional parameters and security measures to protect the access. If a
    hacker penetrates the system, then it is a low impact to the organization and it does not cause any damage.

    Risk Mitigation

    Security policies play a critical role in facilitating the risk management effort and governance. The risk
    mitigation strategy can use countermeasures, offset the risk, transfer the risk, or modify the approach to
    reduce the probability of the risk. In this approach, the organization can use multiple techniques, such as the
    reduction and transfers described below, to help with the mitigation.

    Risk Reduction and Avoidance

    In risk reduction, the organization implements proactive measures to reduce the cybersecurity risk. Risk
    reduction recommendations should be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness, resource requirements,
    complexity impact on productivity and performance, potential unintended consequences, and cost (Santos,
    2019). Many organizations can stay ahead of some risks by simply updating their systems, operating systems
    frequently, and applying patches to their software and systems. However, if an organization wants to be
    proactive, then it needs to plan and allocate appropriate funds to ensure these activities are performed
    throughout the year. Unfortunately, many organizations wait until an event occurs before applying patches,
    which can be extremely costly and increase the chance of system failures.

    Risk Transfer and Risk Sharing

    Organizations can hire an outside cyber-defense firm to help share the risk in case the organization’s data
    were to be compromised. The organization would need to have a contingency plan in place to contact the firm
    when the event occurs. This sounds like a great plan, but it may take hours to evaluate the firm to ensure it
    accepts the risk during the designated period. Many firms will say they are willing to accept the risk, but when
    they are needed, the environment or their workload on other projects may have changed. Therefore, the
    organization will need to stay in contact with the outside firm to ensure they are available when needed. Some
    organizations pay a monthly flat fee just to have the outside firms on standby. Another option is simply to
    purchase insurance in the event of a cyberattack or distributed denial of service (DDOS). We can think of this
    in the same terms of vehicle or home insurance where the insurance would step in to cover the cost to
    resolve the problem. Unfortunately, the organization will not have much time to file a claim because
    operations must continue to service the customers.

    Risk Management Strategies

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Summary

    Organizations can start by establishing IT governance committees to outline how the IT assets, data,
    systems, and networks should be managed and protected. This should be accepted and promoted by top
    management because resources need to be allocated to the committee. We can also use risk management
    strategies depending on the organization’s acceptable levels and risk appetite. There are plenty of risk
    strategies organizations can adopt, but these decisions need to be carefully considered because a potential
    risk may not occur for months or years. It becomes very problematic when a risk strategy was identified in the
    past, but it is no longer a viable option when needed. The organization is then forced to make a decision
    based on the current situation, but it may be a quick decision depending on the severity of the issue.

    References

    National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Computer security resources center: Glossary.

    https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/data-governance.

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Reading Assignment
    – Unit Lesson

    **## UnitIV.pdf**

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    5. Show a familiarity with a wide range of substantive issues in IS security policy creation.
    5.1 Define the purpose of IT governance with policies.
    5.2 Indicate the potential risks associated with IS security.

    Reading Assignment

    Chapter 4: Governance and Risk Management

    Unit Lesson

    Governance

    Organizations usually have some form of governance in place for structure and accountability. Governance is
    the process of structuring, operating, and controlling an organization with the objectives to achieve long-term
    strategic goals, meet the interests of stakeholders, and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Think
    about the functional areas (i.e., accounting, production, and sales, service) and governance within each
    department. What governance practice does an accounting department apply to the financial data of an
    organization? How should this information be protected and used for operations? Governance encompasses
    the establishment of chains of responsibility, authority, policies, standards, and control mechanisms. It
    expresses the expectations, allocation of resources, and management of risks. In Chapter 4 of your textbook,
    you will review the issues associated with silos. The problem with silos is that each department establishes
    their own governance controls, but they do not share these structures or processes with the entire
    organization. To help with this, the information technology (IT) team can gather these structures and
    processes to build the cybersecurity responsibility of IT. However, it must be noted that each department
    performs these activities differently; consequently, it may take time, and it may come with complexities. If IT
    tries to meet regularly with the functional departments, this information can be collected and documented to
    provide a holistic IT governance model.

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    Risk Management with IS Security

    Silo-based cybersecurity example
    (Adapted from Santos, 2019)

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    IT governance refers to the increase of effectiveness of an organization through IT to align with corporate
    goals, protect IT investments, and address IT-related business challenges. The National Institute of
    Standards and Technology (NIST) (2018) defines data governance as a set of processes that ensures data
    assets are formally managed throughout the organization. This needs to be an organizational effort involving
    different functional areas to ensure the data assets are protected. IT governance establishes authority and
    management and decision-making parameters related to the data produced or managed by the enterprise
    (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018). Security policies facilitate organizational efforts to
    devise integration, help in operating performance, guarantee strategic controls, and alleviate risk
    management.

    Policy Alignment

    The development of security policies must align with organizational objectives and strategies. This should
    hold true with any information system (IS) or IT initiative. The importance of policy alignment is that it
    facilitates organizational effectiveness and efficiency, links technology and business, optimizes the business
    model, and ensures success. We can also look to the external regulations within a particular industry. Santos
    (2019) explains how regulations such as Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Health Insurance Portability and
    Accountability Act (HIPAA), Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA),
    Federal Information Systems Management Act (FISMA), and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
    (PCI DSS) relate to cybersecurity so organizations can verify their practices are in line.

    In today’s technological world, IS security is always a topic at the executive and management levels. Security
    is an expected topic of discussion among decision-makers and is given the same level of respect as other
    fundamental drivers and influencing elements of the business (Santos, 2019). In recent years, we have seen
    many organizations create chief information security officers (CISO) positions to address the cybersecurity
    concerns and threats. Why would an organization not hire a CISO (especially if they work with financial or
    healthcare data)? The CISO coordinates and manages security efforts across the company, including IT,
    human resources (HR), communications, legal, facilities management, and other groups (Santos, 2019).
    However, many organizations operate on a strict personnel budget, so hiring this position is not always a
    feasible option. The question is, how can organizations ensure their policies are up to date and sufficient if the
    role is not in place?

    Risk

    Risk can be associated with any business process or project. Think about the risks organizations take on with
    any long-term decision-making. If we implement a simple website or a large enterprise solution, then we take
    on risks. The risks can be substantial or small, depending on the probability and potential impact. We must
    understand the value of communicating and working with functional departments to help identify potential
    security risks and concerns. Therefore, we always need department involvement when identifying the risks.
    Risk is defined as “the potential of an undesirable or unfavorable outcome resulting from a given action,
    activity, and/or inaction” (Santos, 2019, p. 122). The question is then, why we even take risks. Organizations
    take on risk with IT projects because of competition, regulations, growth, or necessity. According to Santos,
    (2019) managing risk implies that other actions are being taken to either mitigate the impact of the
    undesirable or unfavorable outcome and/or enhance the likelihood of a positive outcome. Failure to assume
    any risks with new ventures can be devastating to an organization over the long term because their
    competitors are taking on new risks with innovations to meet customer demands.

    Managing Risks

    As we found, an organization will be subject to risk with any new project or process. Therefore, we have to
    manage the risks if we want to remain competitive with new projects. Managing that risk is an important part
    of the IT department in coordination with management. We can manage the risks with acceptance, mitigation,
    reduction/avoidance, or transfer or share.

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Risk Acceptance

    At first, this sounds bad. However, this strategy is acceptable, especially when there is a low probability or low
    impact of the risk. Risk acceptance indicates that the organization is willing to accept the level of risk
    associated with a given activity or process (Santos, 2019). We may accept the risk if the potential privacy
    implications are low and have little or no impact to the operations. Consider a situation where there is a
    potential for a hacker to penetrate a Web server, but the Web server is rarely used by the organization, does
    not connect to any network servers, and does not contain any sensitive data. The organization may decide to
    accept this risk instead of building additional parameters and security measures to protect the access. If a
    hacker penetrates the system, then it is a low impact to the organization and it does not cause any damage.

    Risk Mitigation

    Security policies play a critical role in facilitating the risk management effort and governance. The risk
    mitigation strategy can use countermeasures, offset the risk, transfer the risk, or modify the approach to
    reduce the probability of the risk. In this approach, the organization can use multiple techniques, such as the
    reduction and transfers described below, to help with the mitigation.

    Risk Reduction and Avoidance

    In risk reduction, the organization implements proactive measures to reduce the cybersecurity risk. Risk
    reduction recommendations should be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness, resource requirements,
    complexity impact on productivity and performance, potential unintended consequences, and cost (Santos,
    2019). Many organizations can stay ahead of some risks by simply updating their systems, operating systems
    frequently, and applying patches to their software and systems. However, if an organization wants to be
    proactive, then it needs to plan and allocate appropriate funds to ensure these activities are performed
    throughout the year. Unfortunately, many organizations wait until an event occurs before applying patches,
    which can be extremely costly and increase the chance of system failures.

    Risk Transfer and Risk Sharing

    Organizations can hire an outside cyber-defense firm to help share the risk in case the organization’s data
    were to be compromised. The organization would need to have a contingency plan in place to contact the firm
    when the event occurs. This sounds like a great plan, but it may take hours to evaluate the firm to ensure it
    accepts the risk during the designated period. Many firms will say they are willing to accept the risk, but when
    they are needed, the environment or their workload on other projects may have changed. Therefore, the
    organization will need to stay in contact with the outside firm to ensure they are available when needed. Some
    organizations pay a monthly flat fee just to have the outside firms on standby. Another option is simply to
    purchase insurance in the event of a cyberattack or distributed denial of service (DDOS). We can think of this
    in the same terms of vehicle or home insurance where the insurance would step in to cover the cost to
    resolve the problem. Unfortunately, the organization will not have much time to file a claim because
    operations must continue to service the customers.

    Risk Management Strategies

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Summary

    Organizations can start by establishing IT governance committees to outline how the IT assets, data,
    systems, and networks should be managed and protected. This should be accepted and promoted by top
    management because resources need to be allocated to the committee. We can also use risk management
    strategies depending on the organization’s acceptable levels and risk appetite. There are plenty of risk
    strategies organizations can adopt, but these decisions need to be carefully considered because a potential
    risk may not occur for months or years. It becomes very problematic when a risk strategy was identified in the
    past, but it is no longer a viable option when needed. The organization is then forced to make a decision
    based on the current situation, but it may be a quick decision depending on the severity of the issue.

    References

    National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Computer security resources center: Glossary.

    https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/data-governance.

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Reading Assignment
    – Unit Lesson

    **## Journal.docx**

    Compose a 300-word essay addressing/answering the following questions:

    1. Describe the characteristics of a cybersecurity policy. Who would create this policy? Who would be affected by it?

    2. Explain how cybersecurity policies can help reduce the threats to an organization. Which threats are the hardest to protect against when dealing with assets?

    3. Explain the characteristics of a successful cybersecurity policy. What needs to be in place during the creation to help with the success?

    4. How does an IS or cybersecurity policy differ from a traditional organizational policy?

    Be sure to use double spacing and paragraph format for your essay. You must use at least your textbook as a source in completing this assignment. All sources used must have proper citations and references formatted in APA Style.

    Course Textbook(s)

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780134858548

    **## UnitIV.pdf**

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    5. Show a familiarity with a wide range of substantive issues in IS security policy creation.
    5.1 Define the purpose of IT governance with policies.
    5.2 Indicate the potential risks associated with IS security.

    Reading Assignment

    Chapter 4: Governance and Risk Management

    Unit Lesson

    Governance

    Organizations usually have some form of governance in place for structure and accountability. Governance is
    the process of structuring, operating, and controlling an organization with the objectives to achieve long-term
    strategic goals, meet the interests of stakeholders, and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Think
    about the functional areas (i.e., accounting, production, and sales, service) and governance within each
    department. What governance practice does an accounting department apply to the financial data of an
    organization? How should this information be protected and used for operations? Governance encompasses
    the establishment of chains of responsibility, authority, policies, standards, and control mechanisms. It
    expresses the expectations, allocation of resources, and management of risks. In Chapter 4 of your textbook,
    you will review the issues associated with silos. The problem with silos is that each department establishes
    their own governance controls, but they do not share these structures or processes with the entire
    organization. To help with this, the information technology (IT) team can gather these structures and
    processes to build the cybersecurity responsibility of IT. However, it must be noted that each department
    performs these activities differently; consequently, it may take time, and it may come with complexities. If IT
    tries to meet regularly with the functional departments, this information can be collected and documented to
    provide a holistic IT governance model.

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    Risk Management with IS Security

    Silo-based cybersecurity example
    (Adapted from Santos, 2019)

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    IT governance refers to the increase of effectiveness of an organization through IT to align with corporate
    goals, protect IT investments, and address IT-related business challenges. The National Institute of
    Standards and Technology (NIST) (2018) defines data governance as a set of processes that ensures data
    assets are formally managed throughout the organization. This needs to be an organizational effort involving
    different functional areas to ensure the data assets are protected. IT governance establishes authority and
    management and decision-making parameters related to the data produced or managed by the enterprise
    (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018). Security policies facilitate organizational efforts to
    devise integration, help in operating performance, guarantee strategic controls, and alleviate risk
    management.

    Policy Alignment

    The development of security policies must align with organizational objectives and strategies. This should
    hold true with any information system (IS) or IT initiative. The importance of policy alignment is that it
    facilitates organizational effectiveness and efficiency, links technology and business, optimizes the business
    model, and ensures success. We can also look to the external regulations within a particular industry. Santos
    (2019) explains how regulations such as Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Health Insurance Portability and
    Accountability Act (HIPAA), Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA),
    Federal Information Systems Management Act (FISMA), and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
    (PCI DSS) relate to cybersecurity so organizations can verify their practices are in line.

    In today’s technological world, IS security is always a topic at the executive and management levels. Security
    is an expected topic of discussion among decision-makers and is given the same level of respect as other
    fundamental drivers and influencing elements of the business (Santos, 2019). In recent years, we have seen
    many organizations create chief information security officers (CISO) positions to address the cybersecurity
    concerns and threats. Why would an organization not hire a CISO (especially if they work with financial or
    healthcare data)? The CISO coordinates and manages security efforts across the company, including IT,
    human resources (HR), communications, legal, facilities management, and other groups (Santos, 2019).
    However, many organizations operate on a strict personnel budget, so hiring this position is not always a
    feasible option. The question is, how can organizations ensure their policies are up to date and sufficient if the
    role is not in place?

    Risk

    Risk can be associated with any business process or project. Think about the risks organizations take on with
    any long-term decision-making. If we implement a simple website or a large enterprise solution, then we take
    on risks. The risks can be substantial or small, depending on the probability and potential impact. We must
    understand the value of communicating and working with functional departments to help identify potential
    security risks and concerns. Therefore, we always need department involvement when identifying the risks.
    Risk is defined as “the potential of an undesirable or unfavorable outcome resulting from a given action,
    activity, and/or inaction” (Santos, 2019, p. 122). The question is then, why we even take risks. Organizations
    take on risk with IT projects because of competition, regulations, growth, or necessity. According to Santos,
    (2019) managing risk implies that other actions are being taken to either mitigate the impact of the
    undesirable or unfavorable outcome and/or enhance the likelihood of a positive outcome. Failure to assume
    any risks with new ventures can be devastating to an organization over the long term because their
    competitors are taking on new risks with innovations to meet customer demands.

    Managing Risks

    As we found, an organization will be subject to risk with any new project or process. Therefore, we have to
    manage the risks if we want to remain competitive with new projects. Managing that risk is an important part
    of the IT department in coordination with management. We can manage the risks with acceptance, mitigation,
    reduction/avoidance, or transfer or share.

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Risk Acceptance

    At first, this sounds bad. However, this strategy is acceptable, especially when there is a low probability or low
    impact of the risk. Risk acceptance indicates that the organization is willing to accept the level of risk
    associated with a given activity or process (Santos, 2019). We may accept the risk if the potential privacy
    implications are low and have little or no impact to the operations. Consider a situation where there is a
    potential for a hacker to penetrate a Web server, but the Web server is rarely used by the organization, does
    not connect to any network servers, and does not contain any sensitive data. The organization may decide to
    accept this risk instead of building additional parameters and security measures to protect the access. If a
    hacker penetrates the system, then it is a low impact to the organization and it does not cause any damage.

    Risk Mitigation

    Security policies play a critical role in facilitating the risk management effort and governance. The risk
    mitigation strategy can use countermeasures, offset the risk, transfer the risk, or modify the approach to
    reduce the probability of the risk. In this approach, the organization can use multiple techniques, such as the
    reduction and transfers described below, to help with the mitigation.

    Risk Reduction and Avoidance

    In risk reduction, the organization implements proactive measures to reduce the cybersecurity risk. Risk
    reduction recommendations should be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness, resource requirements,
    complexity impact on productivity and performance, potential unintended consequences, and cost (Santos,
    2019). Many organizations can stay ahead of some risks by simply updating their systems, operating systems
    frequently, and applying patches to their software and systems. However, if an organization wants to be
    proactive, then it needs to plan and allocate appropriate funds to ensure these activities are performed
    throughout the year. Unfortunately, many organizations wait until an event occurs before applying patches,
    which can be extremely costly and increase the chance of system failures.

    Risk Transfer and Risk Sharing

    Organizations can hire an outside cyber-defense firm to help share the risk in case the organization’s data
    were to be compromised. The organization would need to have a contingency plan in place to contact the firm
    when the event occurs. This sounds like a great plan, but it may take hours to evaluate the firm to ensure it
    accepts the risk during the designated period. Many firms will say they are willing to accept the risk, but when
    they are needed, the environment or their workload on other projects may have changed. Therefore, the
    organization will need to stay in contact with the outside firm to ensure they are available when needed. Some
    organizations pay a monthly flat fee just to have the outside firms on standby. Another option is simply to
    purchase insurance in the event of a cyberattack or distributed denial of service (DDOS). We can think of this
    in the same terms of vehicle or home insurance where the insurance would step in to cover the cost to
    resolve the problem. Unfortunately, the organization will not have much time to file a claim because
    operations must continue to service the customers.

    Risk Management Strategies

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Summary

    Organizations can start by establishing IT governance committees to outline how the IT assets, data,
    systems, and networks should be managed and protected. This should be accepted and promoted by top
    management because resources need to be allocated to the committee. We can also use risk management
    strategies depending on the organization’s acceptable levels and risk appetite. There are plenty of risk
    strategies organizations can adopt, but these decisions need to be carefully considered because a potential
    risk may not occur for months or years. It becomes very problematic when a risk strategy was identified in the
    past, but it is no longer a viable option when needed. The organization is then forced to make a decision
    based on the current situation, but it may be a quick decision depending on the severity of the issue.

    References

    National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Computer security resources center: Glossary.

    https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/data-governance.

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Reading Assignment
    – Unit Lesson

    **## Journal.docx**

    Compose a 300-word essay addressing/answering the following questions:

    1. Describe the characteristics of a cybersecurity policy. Who would create this policy? Who would be affected by it?

    2. Explain how cybersecurity policies can help reduce the threats to an organization. Which threats are the hardest to protect against when dealing with assets?

    3. Explain the characteristics of a successful cybersecurity policy. What needs to be in place during the creation to help with the success?

    4. How does an IS or cybersecurity policy differ from a traditional organizational policy?

    Be sure to use double spacing and paragraph format for your essay. You must use at least your textbook as a source in completing this assignment. All sources used must have proper citations and references formatted in APA Style.

    Course Textbook(s)

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780134858548

    **## UnitIV.pdf**

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    5. Show a familiarity with a wide range of substantive issues in IS security policy creation.
    5.1 Define the purpose of IT governance with policies.
    5.2 Indicate the potential risks associated with IS security.

    Reading Assignment

    Chapter 4: Governance and Risk Management

    Unit Lesson

    Governance

    Organizations usually have some form of governance in place for structure and accountability. Governance is
    the process of structuring, operating, and controlling an organization with the objectives to achieve long-term
    strategic goals, meet the interests of stakeholders, and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Think
    about the functional areas (i.e., accounting, production, and sales, service) and governance within each
    department. What governance practice does an accounting department apply to the financial data of an
    organization? How should this information be protected and used for operations? Governance encompasses
    the establishment of chains of responsibility, authority, policies, standards, and control mechanisms. It
    expresses the expectations, allocation of resources, and management of risks. In Chapter 4 of your textbook,
    you will review the issues associated with silos. The problem with silos is that each department establishes
    their own governance controls, but they do not share these structures or processes with the entire
    organization. To help with this, the information technology (IT) team can gather these structures and
    processes to build the cybersecurity responsibility of IT. However, it must be noted that each department
    performs these activities differently; consequently, it may take time, and it may come with complexities. If IT
    tries to meet regularly with the functional departments, this information can be collected and documented to
    provide a holistic IT governance model.

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    Risk Management with IS Security

    Silo-based cybersecurity example
    (Adapted from Santos, 2019)

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    IT governance refers to the increase of effectiveness of an organization through IT to align with corporate
    goals, protect IT investments, and address IT-related business challenges. The National Institute of
    Standards and Technology (NIST) (2018) defines data governance as a set of processes that ensures data
    assets are formally managed throughout the organization. This needs to be an organizational effort involving
    different functional areas to ensure the data assets are protected. IT governance establishes authority and
    management and decision-making parameters related to the data produced or managed by the enterprise
    (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018). Security policies facilitate organizational efforts to
    devise integration, help in operating performance, guarantee strategic controls, and alleviate risk
    management.

    Policy Alignment

    The development of security policies must align with organizational objectives and strategies. This should
    hold true with any information system (IS) or IT initiative. The importance of policy alignment is that it
    facilitates organizational effectiveness and efficiency, links technology and business, optimizes the business
    model, and ensures success. We can also look to the external regulations within a particular industry. Santos
    (2019) explains how regulations such as Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Health Insurance Portability and
    Accountability Act (HIPAA), Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA),
    Federal Information Systems Management Act (FISMA), and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
    (PCI DSS) relate to cybersecurity so organizations can verify their practices are in line.

    In today’s technological world, IS security is always a topic at the executive and management levels. Security
    is an expected topic of discussion among decision-makers and is given the same level of respect as other
    fundamental drivers and influencing elements of the business (Santos, 2019). In recent years, we have seen
    many organizations create chief information security officers (CISO) positions to address the cybersecurity
    concerns and threats. Why would an organization not hire a CISO (especially if they work with financial or
    healthcare data)? The CISO coordinates and manages security efforts across the company, including IT,
    human resources (HR), communications, legal, facilities management, and other groups (Santos, 2019).
    However, many organizations operate on a strict personnel budget, so hiring this position is not always a
    feasible option. The question is, how can organizations ensure their policies are up to date and sufficient if the
    role is not in place?

    Risk

    Risk can be associated with any business process or project. Think about the risks organizations take on with
    any long-term decision-making. If we implement a simple website or a large enterprise solution, then we take
    on risks. The risks can be substantial or small, depending on the probability and potential impact. We must
    understand the value of communicating and working with functional departments to help identify potential
    security risks and concerns. Therefore, we always need department involvement when identifying the risks.
    Risk is defined as “the potential of an undesirable or unfavorable outcome resulting from a given action,
    activity, and/or inaction” (Santos, 2019, p. 122). The question is then, why we even take risks. Organizations
    take on risk with IT projects because of competition, regulations, growth, or necessity. According to Santos,
    (2019) managing risk implies that other actions are being taken to either mitigate the impact of the
    undesirable or unfavorable outcome and/or enhance the likelihood of a positive outcome. Failure to assume
    any risks with new ventures can be devastating to an organization over the long term because their
    competitors are taking on new risks with innovations to meet customer demands.

    Managing Risks

    As we found, an organization will be subject to risk with any new project or process. Therefore, we have to
    manage the risks if we want to remain competitive with new projects. Managing that risk is an important part
    of the IT department in coordination with management. We can manage the risks with acceptance, mitigation,
    reduction/avoidance, or transfer or share.

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Risk Acceptance

    At first, this sounds bad. However, this strategy is acceptable, especially when there is a low probability or low
    impact of the risk. Risk acceptance indicates that the organization is willing to accept the level of risk
    associated with a given activity or process (Santos, 2019). We may accept the risk if the potential privacy
    implications are low and have little or no impact to the operations. Consider a situation where there is a
    potential for a hacker to penetrate a Web server, but the Web server is rarely used by the organization, does
    not connect to any network servers, and does not contain any sensitive data. The organization may decide to
    accept this risk instead of building additional parameters and security measures to protect the access. If a
    hacker penetrates the system, then it is a low impact to the organization and it does not cause any damage.

    Risk Mitigation

    Security policies play a critical role in facilitating the risk management effort and governance. The risk
    mitigation strategy can use countermeasures, offset the risk, transfer the risk, or modify the approach to
    reduce the probability of the risk. In this approach, the organization can use multiple techniques, such as the
    reduction and transfers described below, to help with the mitigation.

    Risk Reduction and Avoidance

    In risk reduction, the organization implements proactive measures to reduce the cybersecurity risk. Risk
    reduction recommendations should be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness, resource requirements,
    complexity impact on productivity and performance, potential unintended consequences, and cost (Santos,
    2019). Many organizations can stay ahead of some risks by simply updating their systems, operating systems
    frequently, and applying patches to their software and systems. However, if an organization wants to be
    proactive, then it needs to plan and allocate appropriate funds to ensure these activities are performed
    throughout the year. Unfortunately, many organizations wait until an event occurs before applying patches,
    which can be extremely costly and increase the chance of system failures.

    Risk Transfer and Risk Sharing

    Organizations can hire an outside cyber-defense firm to help share the risk in case the organization’s data
    were to be compromised. The organization would need to have a contingency plan in place to contact the firm
    when the event occurs. This sounds like a great plan, but it may take hours to evaluate the firm to ensure it
    accepts the risk during the designated period. Many firms will say they are willing to accept the risk, but when
    they are needed, the environment or their workload on other projects may have changed. Therefore, the
    organization will need to stay in contact with the outside firm to ensure they are available when needed. Some
    organizations pay a monthly flat fee just to have the outside firms on standby. Another option is simply to
    purchase insurance in the event of a cyberattack or distributed denial of service (DDOS). We can think of this
    in the same terms of vehicle or home insurance where the insurance would step in to cover the cost to
    resolve the problem. Unfortunately, the organization will not have much time to file a claim because
    operations must continue to service the customers.

    Risk Management Strategies

    SEC 4303, IS Security Policy Analysis 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Summary

    Organizations can start by establishing IT governance committees to outline how the IT assets, data,
    systems, and networks should be managed and protected. This should be accepted and promoted by top
    management because resources need to be allocated to the committee. We can also use risk management
    strategies depending on the organization’s acceptable levels and risk appetite. There are plenty of risk
    strategies organizations can adopt, but these decisions need to be carefully considered because a potential
    risk may not occur for months or years. It becomes very problematic when a risk strategy was identified in the
    past, but it is no longer a viable option when needed. The organization is then forced to make a decision
    based on the current situation, but it may be a quick decision depending on the severity of the issue.

    References

    National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Computer security resources center: Glossary.

    https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/data-governance.

    Santos, O. (2019). Developing cybersecurity programs and policies (3rd ed.). Pearson.

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Reading Assignment
    – Unit Lesson