Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] OL600 2-1 Journal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering OL600 2-1 Journal.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing Literature Summary Assignment Template

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Literature Summary Assignment Template.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] nursing leadership assessment 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## StakeholderPresentationinstructions.pdf **## StakeholderPresentationinstructions.pdf** Create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third asse…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## StakeholderPresentationinstructions.pdf

    **## StakeholderPresentationinstructions.pdf**

    Create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more
    stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in
    for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.

    Knowing who to include in your project plan presentation is
    important. Is your plan focused on an organization, a patient
    population, or a community? The purpose of the project will
    guide identification of the population. Who are the stakeholders?
    Are they patients? Health and human services providers,
    government officials, influencers, workers whose jobs are
    impacted by the proposed plan? Community activists? Or
    affected local businesses? (Harris et al., 2023). These are all
    important considerations as you plan your presentation for
    stakeholders.

    You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice:
    Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the
    presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will
    create the opportunity to check your understanding of the
    fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to
    identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing
    this activity will help promote success in the Stakeholder
    Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it
    requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

    Reference
    Harris, J. L., Roussel, L. A., Dearman, C., & Thomas, P.
    (2023). Project planning and management: A guide for nurses and
    interprofessional teams (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    This assessment is an opportunity to sharpen your ability to
    create a professional presentation for stakeholders. By using this
    presentation, the stakeholders will have tools to expand on these
    ideas in their workplace, and to drive change and improve
    processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.

    In addition to summarizing the key points of your previous
    assessments, you will be providing relevant stakeholders with an
    overview of project specifics, including how success will be
    measured. Because you will not execute the project, there will be
    no results to complete; however, by carefully examining the ways
    in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will
    experience the thinking required.

    When creating your PowerPoint, keep in mind the target
    audience: the stakeholders at your interviewee's organization.
    The overall goal is to create an educational, persuasive
    presentation that your interviewee could present to his or her
    organization.

    Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint
    Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using
    PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint
    Presentations.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which
    corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please
    study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for
    a distinguished score.

    • Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a
    collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help
    achieve a specific improvement goal.

    • Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to
    address an organizational or patient issue.

    • Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented
    and how the human and financial resources would be
    managed.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint)

    • Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to
    evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in
    achieving the improvement goal.

    • Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed
    speaker notes are provided.

    • Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant
    and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with
    an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

    There are various ways to structure your presentation; following
    is one example:

    • Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.

    ◦ What is the issue that you are trying to solve or
    improve?

    ◦ Why should the audience care about solving it?

    • Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.

    ◦ Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the
    best approach, to addressing the issue?

    ◦ How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or
    reach a goal?

    • Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.

    ◦ What is the objective?

    ◦ How likely is it to work?

    ◦ What will the interdisciplinary team do?

    • Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.

    ◦ How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective
    use of resources?

    ◦ How could the plan be managed to ensure that
    resources were not wasted?

    ◦ How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?

    • Part 5: Evaluation.

    ◦ What would a successful outcome of the project look
    like?

    ◦ What are the criteria that could be used to measure
    that success?

    ▪ How could this be used to show the degree of
    success?

    Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a
    specific group (or groups) at your interviewee's organization, and
    tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember,
    also, that another person will ultimately be giving the
    presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the
    bullet points on each slide.

    • Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each
    part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your
    presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that
    slides should contain concise talking points, and you will
    use presenter's notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a
    reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.

    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of
    scholarly or professional evidence that support your central
    ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. See
    the Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide.

    • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your
    slides and notes pages, and your reference list are in current
    APA style. See the APA Module.

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586)

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will
    demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
    competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and
    financial resources to promote organizational health.

    ◦ Explain how an interdisciplinary plan could be
    implemented and how the human and financial
    resources would be managed.

    • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration
    can be used to achieve desired patient and systems
    outcomes.

    ◦ Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a
    collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would
    help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-
    based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    ◦ Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to
    address an organizational or patient issue.

    ◦ Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree
    to which a project was successful in achieving the
    improvement goal.

    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-
    based communication strategies to impact patient,
    interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    ◦ Produce slides that are easy to read and error free.
    Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    ◦ Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with
    relevant and evidence-based sources (published within

    5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few
    errors.

    **## StakeholderPresentationinstructions.pdf**

    Create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more
    stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in
    for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.

    Knowing who to include in your project plan presentation is
    important. Is your plan focused on an organization, a patient
    population, or a community? The purpose of the project will
    guide identification of the population. Who are the stakeholders?
    Are they patients? Health and human services providers,
    government officials, influencers, workers whose jobs are
    impacted by the proposed plan? Community activists? Or
    affected local businesses? (Harris et al., 2023). These are all
    important considerations as you plan your presentation for
    stakeholders.

    You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice:
    Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the
    presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will
    create the opportunity to check your understanding of the
    fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to
    identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing
    this activity will help promote success in the Stakeholder
    Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it
    requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

    Reference
    Harris, J. L., Roussel, L. A., Dearman, C., & Thomas, P.
    (2023). Project planning and management: A guide for nurses and
    interprofessional teams (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    This assessment is an opportunity to sharpen your ability to
    create a professional presentation for stakeholders. By using this
    presentation, the stakeholders will have tools to expand on these
    ideas in their workplace, and to drive change and improve
    processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.

    In addition to summarizing the key points of your previous
    assessments, you will be providing relevant stakeholders with an
    overview of project specifics, including how success will be
    measured. Because you will not execute the project, there will be
    no results to complete; however, by carefully examining the ways
    in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will
    experience the thinking required.

    When creating your PowerPoint, keep in mind the target
    audience: the stakeholders at your interviewee's organization.
    The overall goal is to create an educational, persuasive
    presentation that your interviewee could present to his or her
    organization.

    Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint
    Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using
    PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint
    Presentations.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which
    corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please
    study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for
    a distinguished score.

    • Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a
    collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help
    achieve a specific improvement goal.

    • Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to
    address an organizational or patient issue.

    • Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented
    and how the human and financial resources would be
    managed.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3639)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/powerpoint)

    • Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to
    evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in
    achieving the improvement goal.

    • Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed
    speaker notes are provided.

    • Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant
    and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with
    an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

    There are various ways to structure your presentation; following
    is one example:

    • Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.

    ◦ What is the issue that you are trying to solve or
    improve?

    ◦ Why should the audience care about solving it?

    • Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.

    ◦ Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the
    best approach, to addressing the issue?

    ◦ How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or
    reach a goal?

    • Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.

    ◦ What is the objective?

    ◦ How likely is it to work?

    ◦ What will the interdisciplinary team do?

    • Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.

    ◦ How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective
    use of resources?

    ◦ How could the plan be managed to ensure that
    resources were not wasted?

    ◦ How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?

    • Part 5: Evaluation.

    ◦ What would a successful outcome of the project look
    like?

    ◦ What are the criteria that could be used to measure
    that success?

    ▪ How could this be used to show the degree of
    success?

    Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a
    specific group (or groups) at your interviewee's organization, and
    tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember,
    also, that another person will ultimately be giving the
    presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the
    bullet points on each slide.

    • Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each
    part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your
    presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that
    slides should contain concise talking points, and you will
    use presenter's notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a
    reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.

    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of
    scholarly or professional evidence that support your central
    ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. See
    the Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide.

    • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your
    slides and notes pages, and your reference list are in current
    APA style. See the APA Module.

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586)

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will
    demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
    competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and
    financial resources to promote organizational health.

    ◦ Explain how an interdisciplinary plan could be
    implemented and how the human and financial
    resources would be managed.

    • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration
    can be used to achieve desired patient and systems
    outcomes.

    ◦ Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a
    collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would
    help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-
    based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    ◦ Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to
    address an organizational or patient issue.

    ◦ Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree
    to which a project was successful in achieving the
    improvement goal.

    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-
    based communication strategies to impact patient,
    interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    ◦ Produce slides that are easy to read and error free.
    Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    ◦ Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with
    relevant and evidence-based sources (published within

    5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few
    errors.

  • [Solved] Nursing In this week’s Assignment, you explore legal and ethical issues surrounding psychiatric emergencies, and identify evidence-based suicide and violence risk assessments.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    n 2–3 pages, address the following: – Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released. – Explain the di…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    n 2–3 pages, address the following:

    – Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released.
    – Explain the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state.
    – Explain the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts.
    – Select one of the following topics, and explain one legal issue and one ethical issue related to this topic that may apply within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies: patient autonomy, EMTALA, confidentiality, HIPAA privacy rule, HIPAA security rule, protected information, legal gun ownership, career obstacles (security clearances/background checks), and payer source.
    – Identify one evidence-based suicide risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.
    – Identify one evidence-based violence risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.

    – [\
    \
    Week8_InstructionsandRubrics.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week8-instructionsandrubrics-pdf "Week8_InstructionsandRubrics.pdf")

    – 2 years ago
    – 0.5

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment #3 Philosophy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## PhilosophyAssignment3Paper.docx **## PhilosophyAssignment3Paper.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-3-philosophy)**_Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application Paper_** **Goal:** Analyze and evaluate a middle range theory. You wil…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## PhilosophyAssignment3Paper.docx

    **## PhilosophyAssignment3Paper.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-3-philosophy)**_Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application Paper_**

    **Goal:**

    Analyze and evaluate a middle range theory.  You will select a middle range theory and identify application of nursing theories into clinical practice
    **.**

    **Content Requirements:**

    1. Components of the theory

    · Discuss the major concepts of the theory

    · Philosophical basis or worldview change, advancing health

    2. Structural aspects of the theory

    · Discuss the framework of the theory.

    3. Identify an area of your practice where this theory could be applicable

    · What question does the theory help to answer?

    · Describe the area of interest in relationship to the theory/theoretical model.

    · Is it appropriate for the practice setting and is it applicable?

    · Discuss the strength and weakness of the theory. If there is weakness, discuss what makes it difficult to be used in practice.

    4. Use of theory in clinical practice.

    · Performing a literature review is essential to completing this section. If there is no literature available about the application of this theory in practice, address reason(s) why based on your findings.

    5. Evaluation of theory

    · Is this theory used to understand and apply into practice?

    · What difficulties did you encounter or would anticipate encountering in using this theory?

    · What would make this theory more usable or applicable to practice?

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions.)

    · The paper is to be 3 – 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    ·

    ## image1.png

    **## PhilosophyAssignment3Paper.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-3-philosophy)**_Middle Range Theory Utilization & Application Paper_**

    **Goal:**

    Analyze and evaluate a middle range theory.  You will select a middle range theory and identify application of nursing theories into clinical practice
    **.**

    **Content Requirements:**

    1. Components of the theory

    · Discuss the major concepts of the theory

    · Philosophical basis or worldview change, advancing health

    2. Structural aspects of the theory

    · Discuss the framework of the theory.

    3. Identify an area of your practice where this theory could be applicable

    · What question does the theory help to answer?

    · Describe the area of interest in relationship to the theory/theoretical model.

    · Is it appropriate for the practice setting and is it applicable?

    · Discuss the strength and weakness of the theory. If there is weakness, discuss what makes it difficult to be used in practice.

    4. Use of theory in clinical practice.

    · Performing a literature review is essential to completing this section. If there is no literature available about the application of this theory in practice, address reason(s) why based on your findings.

    5. Evaluation of theory

    · Is this theory used to understand and apply into practice?

    · What difficulties did you encounter or would anticipate encountering in using this theory?

    · What would make this theory more usable or applicable to practice?

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions.)

    · The paper is to be 3 – 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    ·

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] NSG7020 – Week 4 project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Week 4 Project [Next](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/le/content/124812/navigateContent/92/Next?pId=6506134 "Next") ## **Instructions** ## **Appraising the Evidence and Creating an Evaluation Table** **This assignment will help you take the next step in translating research to practice. An…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Week 4 Project [Next](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/le/content/124812/navigateContent/92/Next?pId=6506134 "Next")

    ## **Instructions**

    ## **Appraising the Evidence and Creating an Evaluation Table**

    **This assignment will help you take the next step in translating research to practice. An RCA must be done on all articles from the literature search that at first blush seemed appropriate to answer your PICOT question. Your literature search most likely resulted in over one hundred articles. Reviewing all of them, while appropriate when creating your own quality improvement (QI) project, is not the most efficient use of time. Since the purpose of this assignment is to learn the process of appraising the evidence and creating an Evaluation Table, you will be provided with results from a pared-down literature search for this assignment that is related to the topic you have been working on. The link to the reference list from that literature search is below. You will use these studies for the assignment this week and in** **Submissions Area. (ATTACHED)**

    ### **Tasks:**

    **This week, you will focus on appraising the quantitative studies in the provided reference list only, reviewing them, and objectively assessing their value for the intervention for your project. You will then summarize the studies in the Evaluation Table, which will provide a snapshot of the external evidence. In** **Week 7, you will create a Synthesis Table and evaluate the results. For now, your focus is on setting up an Evaluation Table and adding the quantitative evidence. (ATTACHED)**

    **To prepare for the assignment:**

    – **Complete RCAs of your quantitative studies using the appropriate RCA checklists.**
    – **Complete RCAs of the quantitative studies only from the** [**Reference List**](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/122366-17148389/media/week4/SU_NSG7020_W4A2_ReferenceList_Scenario2.pdf) **using the appropriate RCA checklists.**

    **Click** [**here**](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/124812-17148444/media/week4/SU_NSG7020_RCA.zip) **to review the RCA checklists.**

    – **Use the** [**Evaluation Table Template**](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/124812-17148444/media/week4/SU_NSG7020_W8A2_OutcomeTable_Template.pdf) **, a Microsoft Word document that can be accessed from the link.**
    – **Develop an Evaluation Table that includes the quantitative studies you have appraised.**

    ### **Submission Details:**

    – **For your assignment, include the following:**
    – **Copies of the RCA checklists for the quantitative studies in one document.**
    – **An evaluation table that includes the quantitative studies.**
    – **Name your compilation as SU_NSG7020_W4_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.**
    – **Submit your paper to the** **Submissions Area by** **the due date assigned.**

    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_W4A2_ReferenceList_Scenario2-WEEK4.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-w4a2-referencelist-scenario2-week4-pdf-10245267 "SU_NSG7020_W4A2_ReferenceList_Scenario2-WEEK4.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_W8A2_OutcomeTable_Template-WEEK4.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-w8a2-outcometable-template-week4-pdf "SU_NSG7020_W8A2_OutcomeTable_Template-WEEK4.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_RCA.zip](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-rca-zip-10245275 "SU_NSG7020_RCA.zip")
    – [\
    \
    Week4projectRubrics.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week4projectrubrics-docx "Week4projectRubrics.docx")
    – [\
    \
    Week4projectRubrics.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week4projectrubrics-docx-10245281 "Week4projectRubrics.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] NSG7020 Week 4 discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Week 4 Discussion **Appraising Quantitative Evidence** **In this assignment, you will discuss the process of appraising quantitative evidence using the appropriate RCA tools. These templates are available on a link below. There is also a list of the checklists named SU_NSG7020_RCA_EBGuidelines_T…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Week 4 Discussion

    **Appraising Quantitative Evidence**

    **In this assignment, you will discuss the process of appraising quantitative evidence using the appropriate RCA tools. These templates are available on a link below. There is also a list of the checklists named SU_NSG7020_RCA_EBGuidelines_Template.doc: Print and use these checklists to appraise the quantitative evidence. (Attached)**

    **The majority of research studies are quantitative in nature, and the appropriate critical appraisal tool should be used based on the study design. In this assignment, you will become familiar with the RCA process and how the results will provide information as to the study's reliability and validity.**

    **You will critically appraise** _**a quantitative study**_ **.**

    **Points to ponder for your initial response:**

    – **Determine the research method used in this study. Also specify the appropriate RCA tool that  you used to appraise the study.**
    – **Determine the level of evidence the study represents.**
    – **Appraise the statistics mentioned in the quantitative study. Determine whether the study is reliable. Your justification for reliability should include:**
    – **The appropriate statistics and an explanation of what that statistic measures**
    – **An explanation of what the result tells you about reliability**
    – **Assess the study design. Determine whether the study is valid and provide your rationale.**
    – **Explain whether the article could contribute to answering the PICOT question. How does the level of evidence represented in the article add to or diminish its value from your perspective?**

    **Complete an appraisal of this article using the appropriate RCA checklists.**

    **Click** [**here**](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/124812-17148444/media/week4/SU_NSG7020_RCA.zip) **to access the appropriate RCA checklists.**

    – **Rapid Critical Appraisal Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Print and use to conduct an evidence review for initiating practice change (intervention).**
    – **Rapid Critical Appraisal Cohort Case-Control Studies: Print and use to rapidly critically appraise case-control studies.**
    – **Rapid Critical Appraisal Cohort Studies: Print and use to rapidly critically appraise cohort studies.**
    – **Rapid Critical Appraisal Randomized Clinical Trials: Print and use to rapidly critically appraise randomized clinical trials.**
    – **Rapid Critical Appraisal Systematic Reviews of Clinical Intervention Studies: Print and use to rapidly critically appraise systematic reviews of clinical interventions or treatments.**

    **Requirements:**

    **Word Count:**

    – **Initial post: 250–300 words. Excluding citations and references.**

    **Content for Initial Post:**

    – **Introduction: Begin with a clear perspective that directly addresses the discussion prompt(s).**
    – **Support with Evidence:**
    – **Incorporate at least one reference from course readings, lecture materials, or external academic sources.**
    – **Use APA style for in-text citations and include a full reference at the end of your post.**
    – **Examples: Provide real-world examples, personal experiences, or case studies when applicable to strengthen your argument.**
    – **Engagement Question: End your post with a question or thought-provoking comment to encourage peer responses.**

    **APA Formatting:**

    – **Use APA style for any citations or references in your initial post.**
    – **A full reference list should appear at the bottom of your post.**

    **Tone and Professionalism:**

    – **Use a professional and respectful tone. Avoid slang or informal language.**
    – **Proofread your post for grammar, spelling, and clarity.**

    **Grading Criteria:**

    **Your post and responses will be evaluated based on:**

    – **Completeness of addressing the prompt**
    – **Integration of course material and evidence**
    – **Quality of writing (grammar, clarity, professionalism)**
    – **Engagement with peers (thoughtful responses)**

    – [\
    \
    RubricAssessment-NSG7020-Week4.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubricassessment-nsg7020-week4-pdf "RubricAssessment-NSG7020-Week4.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_RCA_EBGuidelines_Template.doc](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-rca-ebguidelines-template-doc "SU_NSG7020_RCA_EBGuidelines_Template.doc")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] NSG7020 – Week 3 project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Instructions** ## **Writing the PICOT Question** **In** **Submissions Area, you developed a PICOT question to guide your literature search for evidence. The next step in translating research to practice is to search the literature using the search terms from the PICOT question initially. You may n…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Instructions**

    ## **Writing the PICOT Question**

    **In** **Submissions Area, you developed a PICOT question to guide your literature search for evidence. The next step in translating research to practice is to search the literature using the search terms from the PICOT question initially. You may need to modify these terms depending on the results of your search. Use the Search Tracker to ensure that you do not repeat your steps.**

    ### **Tasks:**

    **In this assignment, you will go through the process of searching for evidence on the basis of the PICOT question you developed in** **Submissions Area. You will experience searching one database and reviewing the abstracts to determine the level of evidence. The expectation is not to do a thorough literature search; the focus is on learning the process.**

    **To begin:**

    – **Review your PICOT question. Incorporate any changes recommended by the instructor.**
    – **Identify the most appropriate databases for your search and make a prioritized list.**
    – **Search one database and fill out the Search Tracker Template (from** **Submissions Area) to avoid retracing your search steps.**
    – **During the process of your search, review the abstracts until you find 8–10 studies that seem related to your PICOT question. Be sure these articles are available in either the South University Online Library or online, as you may need to obtain the entire article for this assignment. Remember to focus on the top levels of evidence, such as systematic reviews and RCTs.**
    – **Compile an APA-formatted reference list of 8–10 articles found in your search. Copy and paste each abstract below the reference. There's no need to review all of the studies to determine the best evidence for this assignment.**
    – **State the level of evidence each study represents below the references. If the level of evidence is specifically stated in either the abstract or the body of the article, simply say so and indicate where it is stated. If the level of evidence is not stated, provide a rationale for how you arrived at your conclusion as to the level of evidence the study represents.**

    **Compile your findings in the following manner:**

    1. **Your PICOT question at the beginning of the Search Tracker**
    2. **The prioritized list of the databases you considered appropriate below the PICOT question**
    3. **The completed Search Tracker for your searches**
    4. **An APA-formatted reference list of 8–10 articles related to your PICOT question, which also includes:**
    1. **The identified level of evidence for each article and a justification for your choice**
    2. **A copy of the abstract below each reference**

    ### **Submission Details:**

    – **On a separate page, cite all sources using APA format.**
    – **Name your paper SU_NSG7020_W3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.**
    – **Submit your paper to the** **Submissions Area by** **the due date assigned.**

    – [\
    \
    Week3projectRubrics.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week3projectrubrics-docx "Week3projectRubrics.docx")
    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_W8A2_OutcomeTable_Template.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-w8a2-outcometable-template-pdf "SU_NSG7020_W8A2_OutcomeTable_Template.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    SU_NSG7020_W3A1_SearchTrackerExemplar.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/su-nsg7020-w3a1-searchtrackerexemplar-pdf "SU_NSG7020_W3A1_SearchTrackerExemplar.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    MYPICOTQUESTION.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mypicotquestion-docx "MYPICOTQUESTION.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] W5F 300 Word

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) See attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## W5FInstructs.docx **## W5FInstructs.docx** Why is earned value better than gut feel project status? Be specific by discussing the various aspects of Earned Value…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    See attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## W5FInstructs.docx

    **## W5FInstructs.docx**

    Why is earned value better than gut feel project status? Be specific by discussing the various aspects of Earned Value.

    300 word minimum

    2 scholarly sources required

    Plagiarism and AI free required.

    A+ work required.

    **## W5FInstructs.docx**

    Why is earned value better than gut feel project status? Be specific by discussing the various aspects of Earned Value.

    300 word minimum

    2 scholarly sources required

    Plagiarism and AI free required.

    A+ work required.

  • [Solved] Project Approval

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Before starting as a project manager, you must present the project for approval. This proposal will provide justification for undertaking the project. Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: – Based on your experience, reading, and research, discuss the information you will gather before…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Before starting as a project manager, you must present the project for approval. This proposal will provide justification for undertaking the project.

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    – Based on your experience, reading, and research, discuss the information you will gather before writing a project proposal.
    – What are 3 benefits of preparing a project proposal?

    – 2 years ago