My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] PHILOSOPHY 7 DISCUSSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## MODULE7PHILOSOPHYDISCUSSION.docx **## MODULE7PHILOSOPHYDISCUSSION.docx** Module 7 Discussion ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/philosophy-7-discussion)**_Theory Development and Evaluation_** Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## MODULE7PHILOSOPHYDISCUSSION.docx

    **## MODULE7PHILOSOPHYDISCUSSION.docx**

    Module 7 Discussion

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/philosophy-7-discussion)**_Theory Development and Evaluation_**

    Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    · Acceptable references include scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions), journal articles, and books published in the last five years-no websites to be referenced without prior approval.

    ## image1.png

    **## MODULE7PHILOSOPHYDISCUSSION.docx**

    Module 7 Discussion

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/philosophy-7-discussion)**_Theory Development and Evaluation_**

    Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    · Acceptable references include scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions), journal articles, and books published in the last five years-no websites to be referenced without prior approval.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] PHARM 7 DISCUSSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## MODULE7PHARMDISCUSSION.docx **## MODULE7PHARMDISCUSSION.docx** ### **Module 7 Discussion** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/pharm-7-discussion)**Treatments for** **Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders** Based on [Module 7: Lecture Materia…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## MODULE7PHARMDISCUSSION.docx

    **## MODULE7PHARMDISCUSSION.docx**

    ### **Module 7 Discussion**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/pharm-7-discussion)**Treatments for**
    **Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders**

    Based on
    [Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/44860/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1) and experience, please answer the following questions:

    1. Describe the diagnostic criteria of osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis

    2. Discuss types of headaches and their treatment

    3. Discuss types of seizures and treatment

    4. Discuss Parkinson's disease, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources.

    Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in an essay format. Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2, followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    · Each question
    **must be answered individually** as in bullet points.
    **Not** in an essay format.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    · Acceptable references include scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions), journal articles, and books published in the last five years-no websites to be referenced without prior approval.

    ## image1.png

    **## MODULE7PHARMDISCUSSION.docx**

    ### **Module 7 Discussion**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/pharm-7-discussion)**Treatments for**
    **Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders**

    Based on
    [Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/44860/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1) and experience, please answer the following questions:

    1. Describe the diagnostic criteria of osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis

    2. Discuss types of headaches and their treatment

    3. Discuss types of seizures and treatment

    4. Discuss Parkinson's disease, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources.

    Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in an essay format. Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2, followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    · Each question
    **must be answered individually** as in bullet points.
    **Not** in an essay format.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    · Acceptable references include scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions), journal articles, and books published in the last five years-no websites to be referenced without prior approval.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] part 2 611

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## 6011part2.docx **## 6011part2.docx** For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video of no more than five minutes presenting your PowerPoint. Expand All **Introduction** …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## 6011part2.docx

    **## 6011part2.docx**

    For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video of no more than five minutes presenting your PowerPoint.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Master's-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact context of that nurse's practice. A key skill of the master's-level nurse is to transfer evidence from the context in which it was presented and apply it to a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new context.

    **Professional Context**

    Master's-level nurses need to be able to think beyond the bedside. It is important to be able to research, synthesize, and apply evidence that will result in improved health outcomes for the communities and populations that are part of your care setting. Improving outcomes at a community or population level, even incrementally, can create noticeably significant, aggregate health improvements for patients across all of a care setting.

    **Scenario**

    Your organization has created an initiative to improve one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the community. Some examples of possibilities for health improvement initiatives include type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and communicable diseases. You will need to do your own research to gather and evaluate the relevant data for your chosen issue.

    Once you have created a presentation for the initiative, you have been asked to present to a group of community stakeholders. The purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.

    **## 6011part2.docx**

    For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video of no more than five minutes presenting your PowerPoint.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Master's-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact context of that nurse's practice. A key skill of the master's-level nurse is to transfer evidence from the context in which it was presented and apply it to a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new context.

    **Professional Context**

    Master's-level nurses need to be able to think beyond the bedside. It is important to be able to research, synthesize, and apply evidence that will result in improved health outcomes for the communities and populations that are part of your care setting. Improving outcomes at a community or population level, even incrementally, can create noticeably significant, aggregate health improvements for patients across all of a care setting.

    **Scenario**

    Your organization has created an initiative to improve one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the community. Some examples of possibilities for health improvement initiatives include type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and communicable diseases. You will need to do your own research to gather and evaluate the relevant data for your chosen issue.

    Once you have created a presentation for the initiative, you have been asked to present to a group of community stakeholders. The purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.

  • [Solved] OL610 Week 6 Activity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering OL610 Week 6 Activity.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] OL600 JOURNAL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering OL600 JOURNAL.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] WK4 ASSIGNMENT HP-111

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    COMPLETE THIS WORK IN DETAIL. READ ALL THE INFO TO COMPLETE!!!! – a year ago **files (1)** – ## WK4ASSIGNMENTHP-111.ComparingHealthcarePerformance.docx **## WK4ASSIGNMENTHP-111.ComparingHealthcarePerformance.docx** **Comparing Healthcare Performance** There are frequent articles blaring how poor the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    COMPLETE THIS WORK IN DETAIL. READ ALL THE INFO TO COMPLETE!!!!

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK4ASSIGNMENTHP-111.ComparingHealthcarePerformance.docx

    **## WK4ASSIGNMENTHP-111.ComparingHealthcarePerformance.docx**

    **Comparing Healthcare Performance**

    There are frequent articles blaring how poor the U.S. healthcare system is compared to other developed countries.

    **Watch the provided video and read the following web site articles:**

    [**Is U.S. health care the best or 'least effective' system in the modern world? PBS NewsHour Video (12:23)**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qn8oCbScitc)

    Despite cutting-edge technology and government overspending, the U.S. approach to healthcare falls short when compared with other countries.

    [**How the U.S. health-care system works – and how its failures are worsening the pandemic**](https://theconversation.com/how-the-us-health-care-system-works-and-how-its-failures-are-worsening-the-pandemic-150271)

    And on and on. But how helpful is this? Or does the constant bombardment about the deficiencies in healthcare simply create an atmosphere of distrust and hopelessness? Perhaps even more important these articles do not contain rigorous research that supports actions. Be sure to look for assertions backed by rigorous research as the article below is.

    [**Mirror, Mirror 2021: Reflecting Poorly**](https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2021/aug/mirror-mirror-2021-reflecting-poorly)

    **Measured five performance domains:**

    · Access to care

    · Care process

    · Administrative efficiency

    · Equity

    · Health care outcomes

    For Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    Using data for the performance domains, the following ranking was developed.

    ![health care performance rankings of the countries](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-wk4-assignment-hp-111)

    As you can see under
    **overall rankings** Norway, Netherlands, and Australia are the top three. The U.S. is last at 11.

    The report conclusions were:

    Four features distinguish top-performing countries from the United States: 1) they provide for universal coverage and remove cost barriers; 2) they invest in primary care systems to ensure that high-value services are equitably available in all communities to all people; 3) they reduce administrative burdens that divert time, efforts, and spending from health improvement efforts; and 4) they invest in social services, especially for children and working-age adults.

    **Compare U.S. healthcare performance on a global scale.**

    Include the following aspects in the assignment:

    · Read the research article.

    · Summarize the finding for each of the 5 performance domains: Access to care

    · Care process

    · Administrative efficiency

    · Equity

    · Health care outcomes

    · Under the Discussion section (Achieving better health outcomes will require policy changes within and beyond health care) identify one policy change for each performance domain that you feel would have the greatest impact.

    · Do you agree with the findings of the report? Why or why not?

    · Cite any references. Proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling are required. Use your own words. Copying and pasting are not allowed.

    · Cite this article: Eric C. Schneider et al.,
    [_Mirror, Mirror 2021 — Reflecting Poorly: Health Care in the U.S. Compared to Other High-Income Countries_](https://doi.org/10.26099/01DV-H208) (Commonwealth Fund, Aug. 2021).

    ## image1.png

    **## WK4ASSIGNMENTHP-111.ComparingHealthcarePerformance.docx**

    **Comparing Healthcare Performance**

    There are frequent articles blaring how poor the U.S. healthcare system is compared to other developed countries.

    **Watch the provided video and read the following web site articles:**

    [**Is U.S. health care the best or 'least effective' system in the modern world? PBS NewsHour Video (12:23)**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qn8oCbScitc)

    Despite cutting-edge technology and government overspending, the U.S. approach to healthcare falls short when compared with other countries.

    [**How the U.S. health-care system works – and how its failures are worsening the pandemic**](https://theconversation.com/how-the-us-health-care-system-works-and-how-its-failures-are-worsening-the-pandemic-150271)

    And on and on. But how helpful is this? Or does the constant bombardment about the deficiencies in healthcare simply create an atmosphere of distrust and hopelessness? Perhaps even more important these articles do not contain rigorous research that supports actions. Be sure to look for assertions backed by rigorous research as the article below is.

    [**Mirror, Mirror 2021: Reflecting Poorly**](https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2021/aug/mirror-mirror-2021-reflecting-poorly)

    **Measured five performance domains:**

    · Access to care

    · Care process

    · Administrative efficiency

    · Equity

    · Health care outcomes

    For Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    Using data for the performance domains, the following ranking was developed.

    ![health care performance rankings of the countries](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-wk4-assignment-hp-111)

    As you can see under
    **overall rankings** Norway, Netherlands, and Australia are the top three. The U.S. is last at 11.

    The report conclusions were:

    Four features distinguish top-performing countries from the United States: 1) they provide for universal coverage and remove cost barriers; 2) they invest in primary care systems to ensure that high-value services are equitably available in all communities to all people; 3) they reduce administrative burdens that divert time, efforts, and spending from health improvement efforts; and 4) they invest in social services, especially for children and working-age adults.

    **Compare U.S. healthcare performance on a global scale.**

    Include the following aspects in the assignment:

    · Read the research article.

    · Summarize the finding for each of the 5 performance domains: Access to care

    · Care process

    · Administrative efficiency

    · Equity

    · Health care outcomes

    · Under the Discussion section (Achieving better health outcomes will require policy changes within and beyond health care) identify one policy change for each performance domain that you feel would have the greatest impact.

    · Do you agree with the findings of the report? Why or why not?

    · Cite any references. Proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling are required. Use your own words. Copying and pasting are not allowed.

    · Cite this article: Eric C. Schneider et al.,
    [_Mirror, Mirror 2021 — Reflecting Poorly: Health Care in the U.S. Compared to Other High-Income Countries_](https://doi.org/10.26099/01DV-H208) (Commonwealth Fund, Aug. 2021).

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Writing English

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attachment – a year ago **files (1)** – ## WEModule7asig.docx **## WEModule7asig.docx** **Module 7:** _White Paper Writer’s Workshop_ Upload your draft to this discussion forum for peer review. When offering feedback to your classmates on their submission, evaluate the following: · Discourse com…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attachment

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WEModule7asig.docx

    **## WEModule7asig.docx**

    **Module 7:** _White Paper Writer’s Workshop_

    Upload your draft to this discussion forum for peer review.

    When offering feedback to your classmates on their submission, evaluate the following:

    · Discourse community: Readers/Audience

    · Rhetorical purpose

    · Organization of writing

    · Reasons for Problem/Solution

    · Support for reasons

    · Sources sufficiency

    · Sources: How they are selected

    · Conclusions/Solution

    · In-text citation

    · The writer’s language & style.

    · Unity & coherence

    · Grammar

    [Here are the definitions of each category. Save this form](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/36787/files/9292460?wrap=1) [Download Here are the definitions of each category. Save this form](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/36787/files/9292460/download?download_frd=1) and provide it as feedback to two classmates along with your comments.

    · Respond to at least two of your classmates' discussion posts by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday. Ask a question, and provide a different viewpoint.

    · Follow established netiquette guidelines when participating in forums.

    · Remember to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-discussions) for your submission.

    **## WEModule7asig.docx**

    **Module 7:** _White Paper Writer’s Workshop_

    Upload your draft to this discussion forum for peer review.

    When offering feedback to your classmates on their submission, evaluate the following:

    · Discourse community: Readers/Audience

    · Rhetorical purpose

    · Organization of writing

    · Reasons for Problem/Solution

    · Support for reasons

    · Sources sufficiency

    · Sources: How they are selected

    · Conclusions/Solution

    · In-text citation

    · The writer’s language & style.

    · Unity & coherence

    · Grammar

    [Here are the definitions of each category. Save this form](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/36787/files/9292460?wrap=1) [Download Here are the definitions of each category. Save this form](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/36787/files/9292460/download?download_frd=1) and provide it as feedback to two classmates along with your comments.

    · Respond to at least two of your classmates' discussion posts by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday. Ask a question, and provide a different viewpoint.

    · Follow established netiquette guidelines when participating in forums.

    · Remember to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-discussions) for your submission.

  • [Solved] Nursing ASSIGNMENT PHILOSOPHY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## PHILOSOPHYASSIGNMENT7.docx **## PHILOSOPHYASSIGNMENT7.docx** ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-philosophy) ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-philosophy)**_Critical Research Appraisal Assignment_** **Goal:** Y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## PHILOSOPHYASSIGNMENT7.docx

    **## PHILOSOPHYASSIGNMENT7.docx**

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-philosophy)

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-philosophy)**_Critical Research Appraisal Assignment_**

    **Goal:**

    You will critically appraise a research design

    **Content Requirements:**

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research

    · Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research approach.

    · Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.

    · Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research evidence for informing nursing practice.

    · Communicate how this research design used in research.

    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations

    · Identify the purpose of the study.

    · Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.

    · Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.

    · Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    · Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument and support with references):

    · Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.

    · Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative research approach

    · Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    · Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics and their relationship to levels of measurement.

    · Communicate how this research design used in research.

    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument and support with references):

    · The study

    · Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    · Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    ·  Sampling

    · Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Data collection

    · Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).

    · Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.

    · Data analysis

    · Outline how the data were analyzed.

    · Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Findings and limitations

    · Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_  or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## PHILOSOPHYASSIGNMENT7.docx**

    ![null](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-philosophy)

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-assignment-philosophy)**_Critical Research Appraisal Assignment_**

    **Goal:**

    You will critically appraise a research design

    **Content Requirements:**

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research

    · Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research approach.

    · Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.

    · Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research evidence for informing nursing practice.

    · Communicate how this research design used in research.

    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations

    · Identify the purpose of the study.

    · Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    · Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.

    · Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    · Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.

    · Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    · Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument and support with references):

    · Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.

    · Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative research approach

    · Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    · Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics and their relationship to levels of measurement.

    · Communicate how this research design used in research.

    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument and support with references):

    · The study

    · Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    · Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    · Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.

    ·  Sampling

    · Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    · Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Data collection

    · Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).

    · Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.

    · Data analysis

    · Outline how the data were analyzed.

    · Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.

    · Findings and limitations

    · Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study

    · Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper should be formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years)
    _scholarly journal articles_  or
    _primary legal sources_(statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

  • [Solved] Human Resource Management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Questions – a year ago **files (2)** – ## EssayQuestions.docx – ## Rubric.docx **## EssayQuestions.docx** **HRMD 630** **Final Exam** This is an open book exam that must be completed as an individual assignment. **Essay Questions** Respond to all three of the following questions. Individual answers …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Questions

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## EssayQuestions.docx

    – ## Rubric.docx

    **## EssayQuestions.docx**

    **HRMD 630**
    **Final Exam**

    This is an open book exam that must be completed as an individual assignment.

    **Essay Questions**

    Respond to all three of the following questions. Individual answers should be a minimum of 250 words but not be more than 500 words each.

    **ESSAY QUESTIONS**

    **Question #1 (25 points)**

    You have just signed on as the Manager of Human Resources for a large manufacturing company in the Chicago area. Your company manufactures parts to the automotive industry such as air duct assemblies for various models of new vehicles as well as to the secondary market for these same parts. Upon conducting an audit of HR initiatives and trying to understand the challenges you want to tackle, you find that the overall turnover rate for this company is 37%. You have not worked in this specific industry but you feel at first glance that this number is high. Based on this limited information that you have, lay out a strategy for addressing turnover. You should include the following in your answer:

    1. Is the 37% turnover a cause for concern? How would you go about finding out this information?

    2. What additional data will you gather to learn more about the turnover in this organization? Remember that your readings discuss different types of turnover and this should be addressed in your answer along with any benefits of turnover.

    3. Assume that you find that the turnover is problematic. Particularly, you discover that the turnover for non-exempt staff is 42% – well over the total turnover for the organization. Prepare a strategy to suggest to the CEO for addressing this turnover, specifically addressing possible causes of the turnover and solutions related to those causes. You will need to think about many of the concepts we have discussed throughout this course in order to answer this question fully.

    **Question #2 (25 points)**

    Discuss the criteria for good cutoff scores as viewed by the courts. You should be able to state clearly what the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures say about cutoff scores.

    **Question #3 (50 points)**

    For this question, assume you are employed as an HR consultant for a mid-sized bank. The bank employs 200 tellers across its branches. Review the details of the teller position as provided on O*Net (
    [http://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/43-3071.00](http://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/43-3071.00)).

    Based on this information, the bank decides that the ideal candidate for this position will possess the following factors:

    1. Have at least a high school
    **EDUCATION** (bachelor’s or associate’s degree desirable).

    2. Have
    **EXPERIENCE** as a teller or in a related field (cashier, billing clerk)

    3. Be able to perform basic
    **MATH SKILLS** related to banking (for example, count currency quickly and accurately and balance a cash drawer correctly).

    4. Be
    **KNOWLEDGEABLE OF VERIFICATION** requirements for bank transactions (for example, errors in check and proper identification to authorize transactions).

    5. Have good
    **INTERPERSONAL SKILLS** (for example, speak clearly, make good eye contact and develop rapport easily).

    6. Be
    **MOTIVATED** to work.

    **PART 1:** Identify which selection methods (e.g. resume, interview, test, role play exercise, reference check or personality inventory) you would recommend for each of the six factors listed above. You can use the same selection method more than once if you believe it is appropriate for more than one factor. Below is an example of how you might justify using an application form as an appropriate selection method for education.

    1. Education – selection method: Application Form

    _Justification: A question on the application form can ask applicants to describe their education. This selection method makes it easy and inexpensive to obtain this information._

    2. Work Experience – selection method: _________________________________________

    _Justification:_

    3. Math Skills – selection method: __________________________________

    _Justification:_

    4. Verification Knowledge – selection method: __________________________________

    _Justification:_

    5. Interpersonal Skills – selection method: ______________________________________

    _Justification:_

    6. Work Motivation – selection method: ______________________________________

    _Justification:_

    **Part 2:**

    The bank collected the following data over the past five years:

    Males applied = 200 Females applied = 300

    Males hired = 40 Females hired = 45

    Based on this information, the selection ratio for men is 20% (40/200), whereas the selection ratio for women is 15% (45/300). Dividing the minority group (women) by the majority group (men) results in an answer of 75% (15%/20%). Since the result is less than 80%, adverse impact exists. The organization needs to explore the selection process to identify what might be the cause of this disparity.

    In this part of the question – you will conduct this analysis.

    The bank compiled selection data on three racial groups during the past year: Caucasians, African Americans and Latinos. The data is as follows:

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | **Number applied** | **Number hired** |
    | **Caucasians** | 90 | 27 |
    | **African Americans** | 50 | 10 |
    | **Latinos** | 40 | 10 |

    Answer the following:

    a. What are the selection ratios for each of the three groups?

    b. Does adverse impact exist when you compare the African American applicant pool with the Caucasian applicant pool? Show your work.

    c. Does adverse impact exist when you compare the Latino applicant pool with the Caucasian applicant pool? Show your work.

    2

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Satisfactory** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Required elements | 40 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses all required elements of the case. | 30 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses most required elements of the case. | 20 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses some of the required elements of the case. | 10 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses a few of the required elements of the case. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Required elements,<br>/ 40 |
    | Quality of discussion and analysis | 40 points<br>The depth of discussion is excellent. All concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is very logical and well-supported. | 30 points<br>The depth of discussion is adequate. Most concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is mostly logical and adequately supported. | 20 points<br>The depth of discussion needs improvement. Some concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs improvement and support. | 10 points<br>The depth of discussion needs significant improvement. Few concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs significant improvement and much more support. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Quality of discussion and analysis,<br>/ 40 |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Knowledge of topic and readings | 40 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates an advanced understanding of the topic and the readings. | 30 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a competent understanding of the topic and the readings. | 20 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates some knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 10 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a very limited knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Knowledge of topic and readings,<br>/ 40 |
    | Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides | 40 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 30 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is mostly logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 20 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is sometimes difficult to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 10 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is very hard to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides,<br>/ 40 |

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style | 40 points<br>The analysis contains very few, if any, minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Content is easy to understand.<br>AND<br>Student properly uses and cites resources. | 30 points<br>The analysis contains minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure; but they do not distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student mostly uses and cites resources properly. | 20 points<br>The analysis contains many minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student sometimes uses and cites resources properly. | 10 points<br>The analysis contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student rarely cites resources. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style,<br>/ 40 |

    Total

    Score of Exam Rubric,

    / 200

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Satisfactory** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Required elements | 40 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses all required elements of the case. | 30 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses most required elements of the case. | 20 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses some of the required elements of the case. | 10 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses a few of the required elements of the case. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Required elements,<br>/ 40 |
    | Quality of discussion and analysis | 40 points<br>The depth of discussion is excellent. All concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is very logical and well-supported. | 30 points<br>The depth of discussion is adequate. Most concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is mostly logical and adequately supported. | 20 points<br>The depth of discussion needs improvement. Some concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs improvement and support. | 10 points<br>The depth of discussion needs significant improvement. Few concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs significant improvement and much more support. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Quality of discussion and analysis,<br>/ 40 |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Knowledge of topic and readings | 40 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates an advanced understanding of the topic and the readings. | 30 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a competent understanding of the topic and the readings. | 20 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates some knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 10 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a very limited knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Knowledge of topic and readings,<br>/ 40 |
    | Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides | 40 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 30 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is mostly logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 20 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is sometimes difficult to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 10 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is very hard to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides,<br>/ 40 |

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style | 40 points<br>The analysis contains very few, if any, minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Content is easy to understand.<br>AND<br>Student properly uses and cites resources. | 30 points<br>The analysis contains minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure; but they do not distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student mostly uses and cites resources properly. | 20 points<br>The analysis contains many minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student sometimes uses and cites resources properly. | 10 points<br>The analysis contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student rarely cites resources. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style,<br>/ 40 |

    Total

    Score of Exam Rubric,

    / 200

    **## EssayQuestions.docx**

    **HRMD 630**
    **Final Exam**

    This is an open book exam that must be completed as an individual assignment.

    **Essay Questions**

    Respond to all three of the following questions. Individual answers should be a minimum of 250 words but not be more than 500 words each.

    **ESSAY QUESTIONS**

    **Question #1 (25 points)**

    You have just signed on as the Manager of Human Resources for a large manufacturing company in the Chicago area. Your company manufactures parts to the automotive industry such as air duct assemblies for various models of new vehicles as well as to the secondary market for these same parts. Upon conducting an audit of HR initiatives and trying to understand the challenges you want to tackle, you find that the overall turnover rate for this company is 37%. You have not worked in this specific industry but you feel at first glance that this number is high. Based on this limited information that you have, lay out a strategy for addressing turnover. You should include the following in your answer:

    1. Is the 37% turnover a cause for concern? How would you go about finding out this information?

    2. What additional data will you gather to learn more about the turnover in this organization? Remember that your readings discuss different types of turnover and this should be addressed in your answer along with any benefits of turnover.

    3. Assume that you find that the turnover is problematic. Particularly, you discover that the turnover for non-exempt staff is 42% – well over the total turnover for the organization. Prepare a strategy to suggest to the CEO for addressing this turnover, specifically addressing possible causes of the turnover and solutions related to those causes. You will need to think about many of the concepts we have discussed throughout this course in order to answer this question fully.

    **Question #2 (25 points)**

    Discuss the criteria for good cutoff scores as viewed by the courts. You should be able to state clearly what the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures say about cutoff scores.

    **Question #3 (50 points)**

    For this question, assume you are employed as an HR consultant for a mid-sized bank. The bank employs 200 tellers across its branches. Review the details of the teller position as provided on O*Net (
    [http://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/43-3071.00](http://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/43-3071.00)).

    Based on this information, the bank decides that the ideal candidate for this position will possess the following factors:

    1. Have at least a high school
    **EDUCATION** (bachelor’s or associate’s degree desirable).

    2. Have
    **EXPERIENCE** as a teller or in a related field (cashier, billing clerk)

    3. Be able to perform basic
    **MATH SKILLS** related to banking (for example, count currency quickly and accurately and balance a cash drawer correctly).

    4. Be
    **KNOWLEDGEABLE OF VERIFICATION** requirements for bank transactions (for example, errors in check and proper identification to authorize transactions).

    5. Have good
    **INTERPERSONAL SKILLS** (for example, speak clearly, make good eye contact and develop rapport easily).

    6. Be
    **MOTIVATED** to work.

    **PART 1:** Identify which selection methods (e.g. resume, interview, test, role play exercise, reference check or personality inventory) you would recommend for each of the six factors listed above. You can use the same selection method more than once if you believe it is appropriate for more than one factor. Below is an example of how you might justify using an application form as an appropriate selection method for education.

    1. Education – selection method: Application Form

    _Justification: A question on the application form can ask applicants to describe their education. This selection method makes it easy and inexpensive to obtain this information._

    2. Work Experience – selection method: _________________________________________

    _Justification:_

    3. Math Skills – selection method: __________________________________

    _Justification:_

    4. Verification Knowledge – selection method: __________________________________

    _Justification:_

    5. Interpersonal Skills – selection method: ______________________________________

    _Justification:_

    6. Work Motivation – selection method: ______________________________________

    _Justification:_

    **Part 2:**

    The bank collected the following data over the past five years:

    Males applied = 200 Females applied = 300

    Males hired = 40 Females hired = 45

    Based on this information, the selection ratio for men is 20% (40/200), whereas the selection ratio for women is 15% (45/300). Dividing the minority group (women) by the majority group (men) results in an answer of 75% (15%/20%). Since the result is less than 80%, adverse impact exists. The organization needs to explore the selection process to identify what might be the cause of this disparity.

    In this part of the question – you will conduct this analysis.

    The bank compiled selection data on three racial groups during the past year: Caucasians, African Americans and Latinos. The data is as follows:

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | **Number applied** | **Number hired** |
    | **Caucasians** | 90 | 27 |
    | **African Americans** | 50 | 10 |
    | **Latinos** | 40 | 10 |

    Answer the following:

    a. What are the selection ratios for each of the three groups?

    b. Does adverse impact exist when you compare the African American applicant pool with the Caucasian applicant pool? Show your work.

    c. Does adverse impact exist when you compare the Latino applicant pool with the Caucasian applicant pool? Show your work.

    2

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Satisfactory** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Required elements | 40 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses all required elements of the case. | 30 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses most required elements of the case. | 20 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses some of the required elements of the case. | 10 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses a few of the required elements of the case. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Required elements,<br>/ 40 |
    | Quality of discussion and analysis | 40 points<br>The depth of discussion is excellent. All concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is very logical and well-supported. | 30 points<br>The depth of discussion is adequate. Most concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is mostly logical and adequately supported. | 20 points<br>The depth of discussion needs improvement. Some concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs improvement and support. | 10 points<br>The depth of discussion needs significant improvement. Few concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs significant improvement and much more support. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Quality of discussion and analysis,<br>/ 40 |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Knowledge of topic and readings | 40 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates an advanced understanding of the topic and the readings. | 30 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a competent understanding of the topic and the readings. | 20 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates some knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 10 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a very limited knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Knowledge of topic and readings,<br>/ 40 |
    | Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides | 40 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 30 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is mostly logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 20 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is sometimes difficult to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 10 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is very hard to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides,<br>/ 40 |

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style | 40 points<br>The analysis contains very few, if any, minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Content is easy to understand.<br>AND<br>Student properly uses and cites resources. | 30 points<br>The analysis contains minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure; but they do not distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student mostly uses and cites resources properly. | 20 points<br>The analysis contains many minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student sometimes uses and cites resources properly. | 10 points<br>The analysis contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student rarely cites resources. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style,<br>/ 40 |

    Total

    Score of Exam Rubric,

    / 200

    **## EssayQuestions.docx**

    **HRMD 630**
    **Final Exam**

    This is an open book exam that must be completed as an individual assignment.

    **Essay Questions**

    Respond to all three of the following questions. Individual answers should be a minimum of 250 words but not be more than 500 words each.

    **ESSAY QUESTIONS**

    **Question #1 (25 points)**

    You have just signed on as the Manager of Human Resources for a large manufacturing company in the Chicago area. Your company manufactures parts to the automotive industry such as air duct assemblies for various models of new vehicles as well as to the secondary market for these same parts. Upon conducting an audit of HR initiatives and trying to understand the challenges you want to tackle, you find that the overall turnover rate for this company is 37%. You have not worked in this specific industry but you feel at first glance that this number is high. Based on this limited information that you have, lay out a strategy for addressing turnover. You should include the following in your answer:

    1. Is the 37% turnover a cause for concern? How would you go about finding out this information?

    2. What additional data will you gather to learn more about the turnover in this organization? Remember that your readings discuss different types of turnover and this should be addressed in your answer along with any benefits of turnover.

    3. Assume that you find that the turnover is problematic. Particularly, you discover that the turnover for non-exempt staff is 42% – well over the total turnover for the organization. Prepare a strategy to suggest to the CEO for addressing this turnover, specifically addressing possible causes of the turnover and solutions related to those causes. You will need to think about many of the concepts we have discussed throughout this course in order to answer this question fully.

    **Question #2 (25 points)**

    Discuss the criteria for good cutoff scores as viewed by the courts. You should be able to state clearly what the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures say about cutoff scores.

    **Question #3 (50 points)**

    For this question, assume you are employed as an HR consultant for a mid-sized bank. The bank employs 200 tellers across its branches. Review the details of the teller position as provided on O*Net (
    [http://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/43-3071.00](http://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/43-3071.00)).

    Based on this information, the bank decides that the ideal candidate for this position will possess the following factors:

    1. Have at least a high school
    **EDUCATION** (bachelor’s or associate’s degree desirable).

    2. Have
    **EXPERIENCE** as a teller or in a related field (cashier, billing clerk)

    3. Be able to perform basic
    **MATH SKILLS** related to banking (for example, count currency quickly and accurately and balance a cash drawer correctly).

    4. Be
    **KNOWLEDGEABLE OF VERIFICATION** requirements for bank transactions (for example, errors in check and proper identification to authorize transactions).

    5. Have good
    **INTERPERSONAL SKILLS** (for example, speak clearly, make good eye contact and develop rapport easily).

    6. Be
    **MOTIVATED** to work.

    **PART 1:** Identify which selection methods (e.g. resume, interview, test, role play exercise, reference check or personality inventory) you would recommend for each of the six factors listed above. You can use the same selection method more than once if you believe it is appropriate for more than one factor. Below is an example of how you might justify using an application form as an appropriate selection method for education.

    1. Education – selection method: Application Form

    _Justification: A question on the application form can ask applicants to describe their education. This selection method makes it easy and inexpensive to obtain this information._

    2. Work Experience – selection method: _________________________________________

    _Justification:_

    3. Math Skills – selection method: __________________________________

    _Justification:_

    4. Verification Knowledge – selection method: __________________________________

    _Justification:_

    5. Interpersonal Skills – selection method: ______________________________________

    _Justification:_

    6. Work Motivation – selection method: ______________________________________

    _Justification:_

    **Part 2:**

    The bank collected the following data over the past five years:

    Males applied = 200 Females applied = 300

    Males hired = 40 Females hired = 45

    Based on this information, the selection ratio for men is 20% (40/200), whereas the selection ratio for women is 15% (45/300). Dividing the minority group (women) by the majority group (men) results in an answer of 75% (15%/20%). Since the result is less than 80%, adverse impact exists. The organization needs to explore the selection process to identify what might be the cause of this disparity.

    In this part of the question – you will conduct this analysis.

    The bank compiled selection data on three racial groups during the past year: Caucasians, African Americans and Latinos. The data is as follows:

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | **Number applied** | **Number hired** |
    | **Caucasians** | 90 | 27 |
    | **African Americans** | 50 | 10 |
    | **Latinos** | 40 | 10 |

    Answer the following:

    a. What are the selection ratios for each of the three groups?

    b. Does adverse impact exist when you compare the African American applicant pool with the Caucasian applicant pool? Show your work.

    c. Does adverse impact exist when you compare the Latino applicant pool with the Caucasian applicant pool? Show your work.

    2

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Satisfactory** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Required elements | 40 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses all required elements of the case. | 30 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses most required elements of the case. | 20 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses some of the required elements of the case. | 10 points<br>Student thoroughly addresses a few of the required elements of the case. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Required elements,<br>/ 40 |
    | Quality of discussion and analysis | 40 points<br>The depth of discussion is excellent. All concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is very logical and well-supported. | 30 points<br>The depth of discussion is adequate. Most concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis is mostly logical and adequately supported. | 20 points<br>The depth of discussion needs improvement. Some concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs improvement and support. | 10 points<br>The depth of discussion needs significant improvement. Few concepts are accurately described and employed. The analysis needs significant improvement and much more support. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment | Score of Quality of discussion and analysis,<br>/ 40 |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Knowledge of topic and readings | 40 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates an advanced understanding of the topic and the readings. | 30 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a competent understanding of the topic and the readings. | 20 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates some knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 10 points<br>Overall, the student demonstrates a very limited knowledge of the topic and the readings. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Knowledge of topic and readings,<br>/ 40 |
    | Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides | 40 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 30 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is mostly logically organized. A clear argument is presented. | 20 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is sometimes difficult to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 10 points<br>The flow of ideas in the body of the response is very hard to follow. There is not a clear argument. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Clarity and Logical Flow of Ides,<br>/ 40 |

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Level 4** | **Level 3** | **Level 2** | **Level 1** | **New Level** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style | 40 points<br>The analysis contains very few, if any, minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Content is easy to understand.<br>AND<br>Student properly uses and cites resources. | 30 points<br>The analysis contains minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure; but they do not distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student mostly uses and cites resources properly. | 20 points<br>The analysis contains many minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student sometimes uses and cites resources properly. | 10 points<br>The analysis contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. They do distract the reader from the content.<br>AND/OR<br>Student rarely cites resources. | 0 points<br>Does not meet minimum requirements for assignment. | Score of Grammar, Spelling, and Sentence Structure APA Style,<br>/ 40 |

    Total

    Score of Exam Rubric,

    / 200

  • [Solved] nurs 507 powerpoint

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## nurs507Powerpoint.docx **## nurs507Powerpoint.docx** Topic: Varicella Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you. Template Example: [PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx](https://stu.ins…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## nurs507Powerpoint.docx

    **## nurs507Powerpoint.docx**

    Topic: Varicella

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you.

    Template Example:
    [PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43826/files/3401652?wrap=1) [Download PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43826/files/3401652/download?download_frd=1)

    1. Select a health problem that primarily affects the pediatric population. Topic is Varicella

    2. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of the disease/disorder to the cellular level.

    · Differential Diagnosis

    3. Educate advanced practice nurses on

    · assessment and diagnostic exams (Remember, APRN are the primary care providers)

    · care/treatment including genetics/genomics—specific for this disorder

    4. Provide patient education for management, cultural, and spiritual considerations for care must also be addressed.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Presentation is original work and logically organized.

    · Followed current APA format for PowerPoint slides, including citation of references.

    · PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.  Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).

    **## nurs507Powerpoint.docx**

    Topic: Varicella

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you.

    Template Example:
    [PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43826/files/3401652?wrap=1) [Download PowerPoint Presentation peds.pptx](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43826/files/3401652/download?download_frd=1)

    1. Select a health problem that primarily affects the pediatric population. Topic is Varicella

    2. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of the disease/disorder to the cellular level.

    · Differential Diagnosis

    3. Educate advanced practice nurses on

    · assessment and diagnostic exams (Remember, APRN are the primary care providers)

    · care/treatment including genetics/genomics—specific for this disorder

    4. Provide patient education for management, cultural, and spiritual considerations for care must also be addressed.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Presentation is original work and logically organized.

    · Followed current APA format for PowerPoint slides, including citation of references.

    · PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.  Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).