Assignment Prompt & Instructions
## **POLICY MODEL**
PLEASE USE THE RUBRICS BELLOW
Read the attached

– ## wk4assign-policy.docx
– ## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx
– ## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx
**## wk4assign-policy.docx**
_he following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S._
_Please select at least two from the following to view._
· CNBC. (2018, December 26).
[_Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensive_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
· FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18).
[_The healthcare divide_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [_(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.
· IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6).
[_The U.S. health care system is terminally broken_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg%20) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.
· PBS NewsHour. (2021).
[_Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA) _._ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.
**## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx**
POLICY MODEL
Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.
For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196706/modules/items/8309443)
TO PREPARE
· Review the twelve policy models outlined in
_Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals_(Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)
· Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.
· You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.
THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)
**Submit** a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.
In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.
Support your response with evidence.
**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
**## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**
**NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**
**NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## wk4assign-policy.docx**
_he following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S._
_Please select at least two from the following to view._
· CNBC. (2018, December 26).
[_Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensive_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
· FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18).
[_The healthcare divide_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [_(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.
· IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6).
[_The U.S. health care system is terminally broken_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg%20) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.
· PBS NewsHour. (2021).
[_Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA) _._ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.
**## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx**
POLICY MODEL
Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.
For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196706/modules/items/8309443)
TO PREPARE
· Review the twelve policy models outlined in
_Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals_(Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)
· Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.
· You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.
THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)
**Submit** a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.
In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.
Support your response with evidence.
**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
**## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**
**NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## wk4assign-policy.docx**
_he following media resources address the contextual factors impacting the answer to the following question, “How did we get here?” regarding the current state of healthcare in the U.S._
_Please select at least two from the following to view._
· CNBC. (2018, December 26).
[_Why medical bills in the U.S. are so expensive_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvnOUcG-ZI
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
· FRONTLINE PBS. (2021, May 18).
[_The healthcare divide_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [_(full documentary): FRONTLINELinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvEkeH4O8o
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 53 minutes.
· IntelligenceSquared Debates. (2017, October 6).
[_The U.S. health care system is terminally broken_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg%20) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0JFn7rVHdg
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 95 minutes.
· PBS NewsHour. (2021).
[_Health care: America vs. the WorldLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA) _._ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BytzrjEfyfA
**Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 56 minutes.
**## wk4assignhealthcarePOLICYMODEL.docx**
POLICY MODEL
Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.
For this Assignment, you will choose from three policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
[**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196706/modules/items/8309443)
TO PREPARE
· Review the twelve policy models outlined in
_Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals_(Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)
· Consider which of the twelve policy models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.
· You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.
THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)
**Submit** a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.
In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.
Support your response with evidence.
**Reminder**: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
**## WK4HEALTHASSIGNRUBRIC.docx**
**NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8100_Week4_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one policy model that best fits your priority, particularly getting your priority on the agenda. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response clearly indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response clearly explains the policy model selected. … The response indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response vaguely explains the policy model selected. … The response vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not explain the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates how the policy model will get the priority on the agenda, or it is missing. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport the selection of the policy model and explain how the model will help move the advocacy priority forward. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response comprehensively and clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.<br> <br>**40 to >35.0 ptsGood** The response clearly supports the policy model selected. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely supports the policy model selected. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the policy model selected, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection. | 45 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100
– 1
– 2
– 3