Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] Global Health 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## GlobalHealthNursing442825.docx **## GlobalHealthNursing442825.docx** NUR4681CBE Section 01CBE Global Health (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2025 Spring Quarter Deliverable 4 – High-risk and Vulnerable Global Populations **Assignment Instructions** **Competency** Inte…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## GlobalHealthNursing442825.docx

    **## GlobalHealthNursing442825.docx**

    NUR4681CBE Section 01CBE Global Health (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2025 Spring Quarter

    Deliverable 4 – High-risk and Vulnerable Global Populations

    **Assignment Instructions**

    **Competency**

    Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations.

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.

    **Scenario**

    As a nurse on the ethics committee of a free clinic, you are educating staff on a high-risk or vulnerable population in the community. You focus on a health condition that affects the community and also impacts the population globally. To help explain the topic, you plan to show the staff a concept map.

    **Instructions**

    Create a concept map showing the relationship of health disparities, pertinent determinants of health, ethical considerations, and human rights for a condition affecting a high-risk or vulnerable population. Your concept map should:

    · Identify the main concept (a condition affecting a high-risk or vulnerable population)

    · Describe the supporting subtopics of:

    · Health disparities impacting the population globally

    · Pertinent determinants of health (at least three)

    · Ethical considerations (at least three)

    · Human rights from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (at least three)

    **Resources**

    For information on creating concept maps, please click
    [here](https://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/236809).

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Details & Information**

    **Assessment due date**

    6/20/25, 11:59 PM (CDT)

    · You cannot submit work after due date

    · You cannot make a new submission attempt after due date

    **Attempts**

    3 attempts left

    **Grading rubric** [This item is graded with a rubric](https://learning.rasmussen.edu/ultra/courses/_169973_1/grades/assessment/_17863720_1/overview/attempt/create/rubric-view?columnId=_6339657_1&courseId=_169973_1)

    **Grading**

    **Maximum points** 4 points

    Save and CloseSubmit

    **## GlobalHealthNursing442825.docx**

    NUR4681CBE Section 01CBE Global Health (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2025 Spring Quarter

    Deliverable 4 – High-risk and Vulnerable Global Populations

    **Assignment Instructions**

    **Competency**

    Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations.

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.

    **Scenario**

    As a nurse on the ethics committee of a free clinic, you are educating staff on a high-risk or vulnerable population in the community. You focus on a health condition that affects the community and also impacts the population globally. To help explain the topic, you plan to show the staff a concept map.

    **Instructions**

    Create a concept map showing the relationship of health disparities, pertinent determinants of health, ethical considerations, and human rights for a condition affecting a high-risk or vulnerable population. Your concept map should:

    · Identify the main concept (a condition affecting a high-risk or vulnerable population)

    · Describe the supporting subtopics of:

    · Health disparities impacting the population globally

    · Pertinent determinants of health (at least three)

    · Ethical considerations (at least three)

    · Human rights from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (at least three)

    **Resources**

    For information on creating concept maps, please click
    [here](https://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/236809).

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Details & Information**

    **Assessment due date**

    6/20/25, 11:59 PM (CDT)

    · You cannot submit work after due date

    · You cannot make a new submission attempt after due date

    **Attempts**

    3 attempts left

    **Grading rubric** [This item is graded with a rubric](https://learning.rasmussen.edu/ultra/courses/_169973_1/grades/assessment/_17863720_1/overview/attempt/create/rubric-view?columnId=_6339657_1&courseId=_169973_1)

    **Grading**

    **Maximum points** 4 points

    Save and CloseSubmit

  • [Solved] discussion 7 theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ module7discussiontheory.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module7discussiontheory-png "module7discussiontheory.png") – [\ \ theoryrubric.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theoryrubric-png-10277011 "theoryrubric.png") – a year ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    module7discussiontheory.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module7discussiontheory-png "module7discussiontheory.png")
    – [\
    \
    theoryrubric.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/theoryrubric-png-10277011 "theoryrubric.png")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] DISCUSSION 7 THEO

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## Discussion7Module7THEO.docx **## Discussion7Module7THEO.docx** ![A screenshot of a discussion AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-theo) ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-theo) ## image1.png ## i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Discussion7Module7THEO.docx

    **## Discussion7Module7THEO.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a discussion AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-theo)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-theo)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## Discussion7Module7THEO.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a discussion AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-theo)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-theo)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

  • [Solved] DISCUSSION 7 PHARM

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (1)** – ## DISCUSSION7Module7Pharm.docx **## DISCUSSION7Module7Pharm.docx** ![A screenshot of a medical discussion AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-pharm) ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-pharm) ## ima…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## DISCUSSION7Module7Pharm.docx

    **## DISCUSSION7Module7Pharm.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a medical discussion AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-pharm)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-pharm)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

    **## DISCUSSION7Module7Pharm.docx**

    ![A screenshot of a medical discussion AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-pharm)

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-7-pharm)

    ## image1.png

    ## image2.png

  • [Solved] SGfinish

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (2)** – ## SMinstruc.docx – ## smartgoalsNUR630.pptx **## SMinstruc.docx** Think back to the five SMART goals you created earlier in the term. Write a reflection paper following APA format and consisting of 750-1000 words in length. Use the following questions to guide your resp…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## SMinstruc.docx

    – ## smartgoalsNUR630.pptx

    **## SMinstruc.docx**

    Think back to the five SMART goals you created earlier in the term. Write a reflection paper following APA format and consisting of 750-1000 words in length.

    Use the following questions to guide your response:

    1. What were you expecting from the experience before you started?

    2. Why were you expecting this?

    3. Why did you choose this goal?

    4. Did you learn anything about a different group in society (i.e., different age, profession, ethnic, racial or socio-economic group)? What did you learn?

    5. What is the most valuable experience you acquired?

    6. What impact did the experience have on your everyday life?

    7. What did you learn that was directly related to your course objectives?

    **## smartgoalsNUR630.pptx**

    Setting SMART Goals

    Art Snoke

    NUR 630

    1

    Introduction

    Clear, reachable goals are needed for growth.

    SMART goals help break down large objectives into manageable steps (Ogbeiwi, 2021).

    The SMART method stands for:

    Specific: Clear and defined goals.

    Measurable: How you can track your progress.

    Attainable: Realistic and possible to achieve.

    Realistic: Possible and practical in your current situation.

    Timely: Having a deadline for when the goal should be achieved.

    2

    Goal 1 – Improve Mental Health Assessment Skills

    I will improve my ability to do comprehensive mental health assessments, aiming for 90% accuracy documenting patient histories, symptoms, by the end of my clinical term.

    Specific: This goal focuses on improving mental health assessment skills, mainly with documentation and identifying psychiatric symptoms.

    Measurable: My target is to have 90% accuracy on assessments, which can be tracked by feedback from my clinical preceptor.

    Attainable: With practice, getting 90% accuracy rate is realistic.

    I want to improve my confidence and accuracy with patient history, presenting symptom, and in order to help improve my ability in mental health assessment. My goal is hit 90% accuracy in my assessments by the end of term. This is specific because it will help improve my mental health assessment’s. Getting feedback from my clinical preceptor can help me track my progress. That is something I can attain because of practice and guidance. It is realistic because mental health assessments are something that psychiatric NP’s are expected to master, and 90% accuracy is a reasonable target. I hope to achieve this goal by the end of the term and with feedback from my preceptor.

    3

    Realistic: With the number of patients seen this goal can be achieved. Also, having supervision and feedback helps.

    Timely: The goal is to improve by the end of 7-week term. Feedback and reviewing my progress to adjust where necessary.

    4

    Goal 2 – Develop Stronger Communication with Patients

    "I will improve my communication skills with active listening and empathy with at least 80% of my patients.

    Specific: This goal is about improving therapeutic communication with patients, focusing on listening, showing empathy, and building trust.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by feedback from patients and preceptor. Attainable: Clinicals provides a chance to practice communication with different patients, and feedback will help improvement.

    Trying to improve on my communication skills, with active listening, improving empathy. I hope to get positive feedback from 80% of my patients. This is a specific goal, it will improve the way I communicate with patients. I will get feedback from my patients and preceptor. I have plenty of chances to practice at clinicals, that’s attainable. It is realistic to improve communication. I will track my progress and hope to hit my 80% target by the end of the 7 week term.

    5

    Realistic: This is a realistic goal because effective communication is needed for nursing, and practicing will make this achievable.

    Timely: Progress will be reviewed and with feedback and goal will be met by the end of the 7-week term.

    Goal 3 – Gain Proficiency in Using DSM-5 for Diagnosis

    "I will get better at using the DSM-5 for diagnosing psychiatric conditions by accurately diagnosing patients under supervision by the end of term."

    Specific: The goal is to use the DSM-5 to diagnose psychiatric conditions, aiming for proficiency with the diagnostic criteria.

    Measurable: The goal will be measured by successfully diagnosing patients using the DSM-5, with my preceptor feedback.

    Attainable: I will have access to the DSM-5 and receive help from clinical preceptor to meet this goal.

    I want to use of the DSM-5 with diagnosing psychiatric conditions. I want to accurately diagnose with the DSM-5 by the end of my clinicals. It is measurable because I can count the cases I'm able to accurately diagnose and my preceptor will give feedback. I will be able to apply the DSM-5 to different real life cases ,this it is attainable. This is a realistic goal because being able to diagnose well and effectively is an important part of psychiatric nursing. I plan to reach this by the end of term.

    7

    Realistic: Using the DSM-5 is an important skill for PMHNP , and with regular patient contact and supervision with my preceptor. I can meet this goal.

    Timely: This goal will be met by the end of term, with regular progress checks.

    Goal 4 – Enhance Collaborative Teamwork Skills

    "I will improve my teamwork and collaboration with working with others. I plan on going to team meetings or case reviews.

    Specific: This goal is focused on improving collaboration with other healthcare professionals, psychologists, and social workers.

    Measurable: The success of this goal will be tracked by attending team meetings or case reviews.

    Attainable: In the clinical setting, there will be regular team meetings, providing opportunities for participation.

    I plan to be involved in team meetings or case reviews. This goal is specific because it shows devlopment of teamwork. This will be measurable, I can count the number of team meetings I attend and being part of the discussions. This is attainable because team meetings will happen regularly so I can volunteer to be active in the discussions. It’s realistic because teamwork is a necessary skill. Working with other healthcare professionals is going to be something I’ll be doing. I will achieve this goal by the end of term and progress will be evaluated withmy preceptor.

    9

    Realistic: Collaborating with a team is a vital part of being a PMHNP, and this goal fits within the scope of the clinical environment.

    Timely: The goal will be completed by the end of my clinical term, with continuing participation and recapping on teamwork skills.

    10

    Goal 5 – Improve Crisis Intervention Skills

    "I will improve my crisis intervention skills by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, using de-escalation techniques and emergency protocols, with supervision with my preceptor.

    Specific: The goal is to develop crisis intervention skills, with focus on managing crises de-escalation techniques.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, with feedback from my preceptor.

    Attainable: The goal is achievable with patient contact, training, role-playing, and real-time supervision.

    I want to be better at handling psychiatric crises with the use of de-escalation techniques. I want to be successful at managing at least two psychiatric crisis with supervision. The goal is specific because learning and applying crisis intervention techniques are essential in this field of nursing. I will be able to measure this by how many crises I successfully manage with feedback from my preceptor. This is achievable because I will be exposed to crisis intervention techniques. It’s a realistic goal, managing crises is part of being PMHNP and I will have time to practice. My goal is to get to this by the end of the clinical term.

    11

    Realistic: Managing psychiatric crises is a key nursing skill, and with proper training and guidance, handling real crises is realistic.

    Timely: The goal will be reviewed with my preceptor during the 7-week term, with two successful interventions being the target.

    Conclusion

    The five SMART goals aim to develop skills in assessment, communication, proficiency, teamwork, and crisis intervention.

    Having clear, measurable, and realistic goals ensures progress and positive development throughout clinicals.

    I will evaluate progress with my preceptor and adjust goals as needed to improve.

    References

    Ogbeiwi, O. (2021). General concepts of goals and goal-setting in healthcare: A narrative review. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(2), 324-341.

    ## image1.jpg

    **## smartgoalsNUR630.pptx**

    Setting SMART Goals

    Art Snoke

    NUR 630

    1

    Introduction

    Clear, reachable goals are needed for growth.

    SMART goals help break down large objectives into manageable steps (Ogbeiwi, 2021).

    The SMART method stands for:

    Specific: Clear and defined goals.

    Measurable: How you can track your progress.

    Attainable: Realistic and possible to achieve.

    Realistic: Possible and practical in your current situation.

    Timely: Having a deadline for when the goal should be achieved.

    2

    Goal 1 – Improve Mental Health Assessment Skills

    I will improve my ability to do comprehensive mental health assessments, aiming for 90% accuracy documenting patient histories, symptoms, by the end of my clinical term.

    Specific: This goal focuses on improving mental health assessment skills, mainly with documentation and identifying psychiatric symptoms.

    Measurable: My target is to have 90% accuracy on assessments, which can be tracked by feedback from my clinical preceptor.

    Attainable: With practice, getting 90% accuracy rate is realistic.

    I want to improve my confidence and accuracy with patient history, presenting symptom, and in order to help improve my ability in mental health assessment. My goal is hit 90% accuracy in my assessments by the end of term. This is specific because it will help improve my mental health assessment’s. Getting feedback from my clinical preceptor can help me track my progress. That is something I can attain because of practice and guidance. It is realistic because mental health assessments are something that psychiatric NP’s are expected to master, and 90% accuracy is a reasonable target. I hope to achieve this goal by the end of the term and with feedback from my preceptor.

    3

    Realistic: With the number of patients seen this goal can be achieved. Also, having supervision and feedback helps.

    Timely: The goal is to improve by the end of 7-week term. Feedback and reviewing my progress to adjust where necessary.

    4

    Goal 2 – Develop Stronger Communication with Patients

    "I will improve my communication skills with active listening and empathy with at least 80% of my patients.

    Specific: This goal is about improving therapeutic communication with patients, focusing on listening, showing empathy, and building trust.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by feedback from patients and preceptor. Attainable: Clinicals provides a chance to practice communication with different patients, and feedback will help improvement.

    Trying to improve on my communication skills, with active listening, improving empathy. I hope to get positive feedback from 80% of my patients. This is a specific goal, it will improve the way I communicate with patients. I will get feedback from my patients and preceptor. I have plenty of chances to practice at clinicals, that’s attainable. It is realistic to improve communication. I will track my progress and hope to hit my 80% target by the end of the 7 week term.

    5

    Realistic: This is a realistic goal because effective communication is needed for nursing, and practicing will make this achievable.

    Timely: Progress will be reviewed and with feedback and goal will be met by the end of the 7-week term.

    Goal 3 – Gain Proficiency in Using DSM-5 for Diagnosis

    "I will get better at using the DSM-5 for diagnosing psychiatric conditions by accurately diagnosing patients under supervision by the end of term."

    Specific: The goal is to use the DSM-5 to diagnose psychiatric conditions, aiming for proficiency with the diagnostic criteria.

    Measurable: The goal will be measured by successfully diagnosing patients using the DSM-5, with my preceptor feedback.

    Attainable: I will have access to the DSM-5 and receive help from clinical preceptor to meet this goal.

    I want to use of the DSM-5 with diagnosing psychiatric conditions. I want to accurately diagnose with the DSM-5 by the end of my clinicals. It is measurable because I can count the cases I'm able to accurately diagnose and my preceptor will give feedback. I will be able to apply the DSM-5 to different real life cases ,this it is attainable. This is a realistic goal because being able to diagnose well and effectively is an important part of psychiatric nursing. I plan to reach this by the end of term.

    7

    Realistic: Using the DSM-5 is an important skill for PMHNP , and with regular patient contact and supervision with my preceptor. I can meet this goal.

    Timely: This goal will be met by the end of term, with regular progress checks.

    Goal 4 – Enhance Collaborative Teamwork Skills

    "I will improve my teamwork and collaboration with working with others. I plan on going to team meetings or case reviews.

    Specific: This goal is focused on improving collaboration with other healthcare professionals, psychologists, and social workers.

    Measurable: The success of this goal will be tracked by attending team meetings or case reviews.

    Attainable: In the clinical setting, there will be regular team meetings, providing opportunities for participation.

    I plan to be involved in team meetings or case reviews. This goal is specific because it shows devlopment of teamwork. This will be measurable, I can count the number of team meetings I attend and being part of the discussions. This is attainable because team meetings will happen regularly so I can volunteer to be active in the discussions. It’s realistic because teamwork is a necessary skill. Working with other healthcare professionals is going to be something I’ll be doing. I will achieve this goal by the end of term and progress will be evaluated withmy preceptor.

    9

    Realistic: Collaborating with a team is a vital part of being a PMHNP, and this goal fits within the scope of the clinical environment.

    Timely: The goal will be completed by the end of my clinical term, with continuing participation and recapping on teamwork skills.

    10

    Goal 5 – Improve Crisis Intervention Skills

    "I will improve my crisis intervention skills by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, using de-escalation techniques and emergency protocols, with supervision with my preceptor.

    Specific: The goal is to develop crisis intervention skills, with focus on managing crises de-escalation techniques.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, with feedback from my preceptor.

    Attainable: The goal is achievable with patient contact, training, role-playing, and real-time supervision.

    I want to be better at handling psychiatric crises with the use of de-escalation techniques. I want to be successful at managing at least two psychiatric crisis with supervision. The goal is specific because learning and applying crisis intervention techniques are essential in this field of nursing. I will be able to measure this by how many crises I successfully manage with feedback from my preceptor. This is achievable because I will be exposed to crisis intervention techniques. It’s a realistic goal, managing crises is part of being PMHNP and I will have time to practice. My goal is to get to this by the end of the clinical term.

    11

    Realistic: Managing psychiatric crises is a key nursing skill, and with proper training and guidance, handling real crises is realistic.

    Timely: The goal will be reviewed with my preceptor during the 7-week term, with two successful interventions being the target.

    Conclusion

    The five SMART goals aim to develop skills in assessment, communication, proficiency, teamwork, and crisis intervention.

    Having clear, measurable, and realistic goals ensures progress and positive development throughout clinicals.

    I will evaluate progress with my preceptor and adjust goals as needed to improve.

    References

    Ogbeiwi, O. (2021). General concepts of goals and goal-setting in healthcare: A narrative review. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(2), 324-341.

    ## image1.jpg

    **## SMinstruc.docx**

    Think back to the five SMART goals you created earlier in the term. Write a reflection paper following APA format and consisting of 750-1000 words in length.

    Use the following questions to guide your response:

    1. What were you expecting from the experience before you started?

    2. Why were you expecting this?

    3. Why did you choose this goal?

    4. Did you learn anything about a different group in society (i.e., different age, profession, ethnic, racial or socio-economic group)? What did you learn?

    5. What is the most valuable experience you acquired?

    6. What impact did the experience have on your everyday life?

    7. What did you learn that was directly related to your course objectives?

    **## smartgoalsNUR630.pptx**

    Setting SMART Goals

    Art Snoke

    NUR 630

    1

    Introduction

    Clear, reachable goals are needed for growth.

    SMART goals help break down large objectives into manageable steps (Ogbeiwi, 2021).

    The SMART method stands for:

    Specific: Clear and defined goals.

    Measurable: How you can track your progress.

    Attainable: Realistic and possible to achieve.

    Realistic: Possible and practical in your current situation.

    Timely: Having a deadline for when the goal should be achieved.

    2

    Goal 1 – Improve Mental Health Assessment Skills

    I will improve my ability to do comprehensive mental health assessments, aiming for 90% accuracy documenting patient histories, symptoms, by the end of my clinical term.

    Specific: This goal focuses on improving mental health assessment skills, mainly with documentation and identifying psychiatric symptoms.

    Measurable: My target is to have 90% accuracy on assessments, which can be tracked by feedback from my clinical preceptor.

    Attainable: With practice, getting 90% accuracy rate is realistic.

    I want to improve my confidence and accuracy with patient history, presenting symptom, and in order to help improve my ability in mental health assessment. My goal is hit 90% accuracy in my assessments by the end of term. This is specific because it will help improve my mental health assessment’s. Getting feedback from my clinical preceptor can help me track my progress. That is something I can attain because of practice and guidance. It is realistic because mental health assessments are something that psychiatric NP’s are expected to master, and 90% accuracy is a reasonable target. I hope to achieve this goal by the end of the term and with feedback from my preceptor.

    3

    Realistic: With the number of patients seen this goal can be achieved. Also, having supervision and feedback helps.

    Timely: The goal is to improve by the end of 7-week term. Feedback and reviewing my progress to adjust where necessary.

    4

    Goal 2 – Develop Stronger Communication with Patients

    "I will improve my communication skills with active listening and empathy with at least 80% of my patients.

    Specific: This goal is about improving therapeutic communication with patients, focusing on listening, showing empathy, and building trust.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by feedback from patients and preceptor. Attainable: Clinicals provides a chance to practice communication with different patients, and feedback will help improvement.

    Trying to improve on my communication skills, with active listening, improving empathy. I hope to get positive feedback from 80% of my patients. This is a specific goal, it will improve the way I communicate with patients. I will get feedback from my patients and preceptor. I have plenty of chances to practice at clinicals, that’s attainable. It is realistic to improve communication. I will track my progress and hope to hit my 80% target by the end of the 7 week term.

    5

    Realistic: This is a realistic goal because effective communication is needed for nursing, and practicing will make this achievable.

    Timely: Progress will be reviewed and with feedback and goal will be met by the end of the 7-week term.

    Goal 3 – Gain Proficiency in Using DSM-5 for Diagnosis

    "I will get better at using the DSM-5 for diagnosing psychiatric conditions by accurately diagnosing patients under supervision by the end of term."

    Specific: The goal is to use the DSM-5 to diagnose psychiatric conditions, aiming for proficiency with the diagnostic criteria.

    Measurable: The goal will be measured by successfully diagnosing patients using the DSM-5, with my preceptor feedback.

    Attainable: I will have access to the DSM-5 and receive help from clinical preceptor to meet this goal.

    I want to use of the DSM-5 with diagnosing psychiatric conditions. I want to accurately diagnose with the DSM-5 by the end of my clinicals. It is measurable because I can count the cases I'm able to accurately diagnose and my preceptor will give feedback. I will be able to apply the DSM-5 to different real life cases ,this it is attainable. This is a realistic goal because being able to diagnose well and effectively is an important part of psychiatric nursing. I plan to reach this by the end of term.

    7

    Realistic: Using the DSM-5 is an important skill for PMHNP , and with regular patient contact and supervision with my preceptor. I can meet this goal.

    Timely: This goal will be met by the end of term, with regular progress checks.

    Goal 4 – Enhance Collaborative Teamwork Skills

    "I will improve my teamwork and collaboration with working with others. I plan on going to team meetings or case reviews.

    Specific: This goal is focused on improving collaboration with other healthcare professionals, psychologists, and social workers.

    Measurable: The success of this goal will be tracked by attending team meetings or case reviews.

    Attainable: In the clinical setting, there will be regular team meetings, providing opportunities for participation.

    I plan to be involved in team meetings or case reviews. This goal is specific because it shows devlopment of teamwork. This will be measurable, I can count the number of team meetings I attend and being part of the discussions. This is attainable because team meetings will happen regularly so I can volunteer to be active in the discussions. It’s realistic because teamwork is a necessary skill. Working with other healthcare professionals is going to be something I’ll be doing. I will achieve this goal by the end of term and progress will be evaluated withmy preceptor.

    9

    Realistic: Collaborating with a team is a vital part of being a PMHNP, and this goal fits within the scope of the clinical environment.

    Timely: The goal will be completed by the end of my clinical term, with continuing participation and recapping on teamwork skills.

    10

    Goal 5 – Improve Crisis Intervention Skills

    "I will improve my crisis intervention skills by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, using de-escalation techniques and emergency protocols, with supervision with my preceptor.

    Specific: The goal is to develop crisis intervention skills, with focus on managing crises de-escalation techniques.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, with feedback from my preceptor.

    Attainable: The goal is achievable with patient contact, training, role-playing, and real-time supervision.

    I want to be better at handling psychiatric crises with the use of de-escalation techniques. I want to be successful at managing at least two psychiatric crisis with supervision. The goal is specific because learning and applying crisis intervention techniques are essential in this field of nursing. I will be able to measure this by how many crises I successfully manage with feedback from my preceptor. This is achievable because I will be exposed to crisis intervention techniques. It’s a realistic goal, managing crises is part of being PMHNP and I will have time to practice. My goal is to get to this by the end of the clinical term.

    11

    Realistic: Managing psychiatric crises is a key nursing skill, and with proper training and guidance, handling real crises is realistic.

    Timely: The goal will be reviewed with my preceptor during the 7-week term, with two successful interventions being the target.

    Conclusion

    The five SMART goals aim to develop skills in assessment, communication, proficiency, teamwork, and crisis intervention.

    Having clear, measurable, and realistic goals ensures progress and positive development throughout clinicals.

    I will evaluate progress with my preceptor and adjust goals as needed to improve.

    References

    Ogbeiwi, O. (2021). General concepts of goals and goal-setting in healthcare: A narrative review. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(2), 324-341.

    ## image1.jpg

    **## SMinstruc.docx**

    Think back to the five SMART goals you created earlier in the term. Write a reflection paper following APA format and consisting of 750-1000 words in length.

    Use the following questions to guide your response:

    1. What were you expecting from the experience before you started?

    2. Why were you expecting this?

    3. Why did you choose this goal?

    4. Did you learn anything about a different group in society (i.e., different age, profession, ethnic, racial or socio-economic group)? What did you learn?

    5. What is the most valuable experience you acquired?

    6. What impact did the experience have on your everyday life?

    7. What did you learn that was directly related to your course objectives?

    **## smartgoalsNUR630.pptx**

    Setting SMART Goals

    Art Snoke

    NUR 630

    1

    Introduction

    Clear, reachable goals are needed for growth.

    SMART goals help break down large objectives into manageable steps (Ogbeiwi, 2021).

    The SMART method stands for:

    Specific: Clear and defined goals.

    Measurable: How you can track your progress.

    Attainable: Realistic and possible to achieve.

    Realistic: Possible and practical in your current situation.

    Timely: Having a deadline for when the goal should be achieved.

    2

    Goal 1 – Improve Mental Health Assessment Skills

    I will improve my ability to do comprehensive mental health assessments, aiming for 90% accuracy documenting patient histories, symptoms, by the end of my clinical term.

    Specific: This goal focuses on improving mental health assessment skills, mainly with documentation and identifying psychiatric symptoms.

    Measurable: My target is to have 90% accuracy on assessments, which can be tracked by feedback from my clinical preceptor.

    Attainable: With practice, getting 90% accuracy rate is realistic.

    I want to improve my confidence and accuracy with patient history, presenting symptom, and in order to help improve my ability in mental health assessment. My goal is hit 90% accuracy in my assessments by the end of term. This is specific because it will help improve my mental health assessment’s. Getting feedback from my clinical preceptor can help me track my progress. That is something I can attain because of practice and guidance. It is realistic because mental health assessments are something that psychiatric NP’s are expected to master, and 90% accuracy is a reasonable target. I hope to achieve this goal by the end of the term and with feedback from my preceptor.

    3

    Realistic: With the number of patients seen this goal can be achieved. Also, having supervision and feedback helps.

    Timely: The goal is to improve by the end of 7-week term. Feedback and reviewing my progress to adjust where necessary.

    4

    Goal 2 – Develop Stronger Communication with Patients

    "I will improve my communication skills with active listening and empathy with at least 80% of my patients.

    Specific: This goal is about improving therapeutic communication with patients, focusing on listening, showing empathy, and building trust.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by feedback from patients and preceptor. Attainable: Clinicals provides a chance to practice communication with different patients, and feedback will help improvement.

    Trying to improve on my communication skills, with active listening, improving empathy. I hope to get positive feedback from 80% of my patients. This is a specific goal, it will improve the way I communicate with patients. I will get feedback from my patients and preceptor. I have plenty of chances to practice at clinicals, that’s attainable. It is realistic to improve communication. I will track my progress and hope to hit my 80% target by the end of the 7 week term.

    5

    Realistic: This is a realistic goal because effective communication is needed for nursing, and practicing will make this achievable.

    Timely: Progress will be reviewed and with feedback and goal will be met by the end of the 7-week term.

    Goal 3 – Gain Proficiency in Using DSM-5 for Diagnosis

    "I will get better at using the DSM-5 for diagnosing psychiatric conditions by accurately diagnosing patients under supervision by the end of term."

    Specific: The goal is to use the DSM-5 to diagnose psychiatric conditions, aiming for proficiency with the diagnostic criteria.

    Measurable: The goal will be measured by successfully diagnosing patients using the DSM-5, with my preceptor feedback.

    Attainable: I will have access to the DSM-5 and receive help from clinical preceptor to meet this goal.

    I want to use of the DSM-5 with diagnosing psychiatric conditions. I want to accurately diagnose with the DSM-5 by the end of my clinicals. It is measurable because I can count the cases I'm able to accurately diagnose and my preceptor will give feedback. I will be able to apply the DSM-5 to different real life cases ,this it is attainable. This is a realistic goal because being able to diagnose well and effectively is an important part of psychiatric nursing. I plan to reach this by the end of term.

    7

    Realistic: Using the DSM-5 is an important skill for PMHNP , and with regular patient contact and supervision with my preceptor. I can meet this goal.

    Timely: This goal will be met by the end of term, with regular progress checks.

    Goal 4 – Enhance Collaborative Teamwork Skills

    "I will improve my teamwork and collaboration with working with others. I plan on going to team meetings or case reviews.

    Specific: This goal is focused on improving collaboration with other healthcare professionals, psychologists, and social workers.

    Measurable: The success of this goal will be tracked by attending team meetings or case reviews.

    Attainable: In the clinical setting, there will be regular team meetings, providing opportunities for participation.

    I plan to be involved in team meetings or case reviews. This goal is specific because it shows devlopment of teamwork. This will be measurable, I can count the number of team meetings I attend and being part of the discussions. This is attainable because team meetings will happen regularly so I can volunteer to be active in the discussions. It’s realistic because teamwork is a necessary skill. Working with other healthcare professionals is going to be something I’ll be doing. I will achieve this goal by the end of term and progress will be evaluated withmy preceptor.

    9

    Realistic: Collaborating with a team is a vital part of being a PMHNP, and this goal fits within the scope of the clinical environment.

    Timely: The goal will be completed by the end of my clinical term, with continuing participation and recapping on teamwork skills.

    10

    Goal 5 – Improve Crisis Intervention Skills

    "I will improve my crisis intervention skills by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, using de-escalation techniques and emergency protocols, with supervision with my preceptor.

    Specific: The goal is to develop crisis intervention skills, with focus on managing crises de-escalation techniques.

    Measurable: Success will be measured by successfully managing at least two psychiatric crises, with feedback from my preceptor.

    Attainable: The goal is achievable with patient contact, training, role-playing, and real-time supervision.

    I want to be better at handling psychiatric crises with the use of de-escalation techniques. I want to be successful at managing at least two psychiatric crisis with supervision. The goal is specific because learning and applying crisis intervention techniques are essential in this field of nursing. I will be able to measure this by how many crises I successfully manage with feedback from my preceptor. This is achievable because I will be exposed to crisis intervention techniques. It’s a realistic goal, managing crises is part of being PMHNP and I will have time to practice. My goal is to get to this by the end of the clinical term.

    11

    Realistic: Managing psychiatric crises is a key nursing skill, and with proper training and guidance, handling real crises is realistic.

    Timely: The goal will be reviewed with my preceptor during the 7-week term, with two successful interventions being the target.

    Conclusion

    The five SMART goals aim to develop skills in assessment, communication, proficiency, teamwork, and crisis intervention.

    Having clear, measurable, and realistic goals ensures progress and positive development throughout clinicals.

    I will evaluate progress with my preceptor and adjust goals as needed to improve.

    References

    Ogbeiwi, O. (2021). General concepts of goals and goal-setting in healthcare: A narrative review. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(2), 324-341.

    ## image1.jpg

  • [Solved] Reflective work on the Research Project and Clinical Hours

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    The purpose of this homework is to reflect on your experience in the course, focusing on your final research project and clinical hours. The homework will allow you to analyze how these experiences impacted your professional development, your community, and future project sustainability. Attached, y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    The purpose of this homework is to reflect on your experience in the course, focusing on your final research project and clinical hours. The homework will allow you to analyze how these experiences impacted your professional development, your community, and future project sustainability.

    Attached, you will find my "Final Research Project" in PDF. Note: I was required to complete 125 clinical hours during the last semester for the completion of my project.

    **Instructions:**

    1. Address the following points:

    **Final Research Project:**

    – Explain how your project can generate a positive change in the community and patients' lives.
    – Analyze how your project contributed to your personal and professional experience and prepared you for the future as a DN-prepared nurse.
    – Reflect on the strategies you would implement to ensure your project remains sustainable and does not fall into disuse after graduation.

    **Clinical Hours Experience:**

    – Evaluate whether the clinical hours completed during the course were sufficient to meet your learning objectives. Provide clear and detailed reasoning to support your response.
    – Reflect on how the clinical hours positively impacted your professional development, emphasizing the most beneficial aspects.
    – Identify specific elements of the clinical hours that you would modify and explain the reasons for suggesting these changes.

    You must submit your writing double-spaced, in Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with font size 12.

    Be sure to review the academic expectations for your submission.

    No Plagiarism, turnitin assignment.

    – [\
    \
    FinalSubmissionofDoctoralProject.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/finalsubmissionofdoctoralproject-docx "FinalSubmissionofDoctoralProject.docx")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Nursing Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – a year ago **files (3)** – ## CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable.pdf – ## Instructions.RCTCriticalAppraisal.docx – RCTMindfulnessinSchizophrenia.pdf **## CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable.pdf** CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist: 11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised cont…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – a year ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable.pdf

    – ## Instructions.RCTCriticalAppraisal.docx

    – RCTMindfulnessinSchizophrenia.pdf

    **## CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable.pdf**

    CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:
    11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)

    Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising a
    randomised controlled trial:

    Is the basic study design valid for a randomised
    controlled trial? (Section A)

    Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)
    What are the results? (Section C)
    Will the results help locally? (Section D)

    The 11 questions in the checklist are designed to help you think about these aspects
    systematically.

    How to use this appraisal tool: The first three questions (Section A) are screening questions
    about the validity of the basic study design and can be answered quickly. If, in light of your
    responses to Section A, you think the study design is valid, continue to Section B to assess
    whether the study was methodologically sound and if it is worth continuing with the appraisal by
    answering the remaining questions in Sections C and D.

    Record ‘Yes’, ‘No’ or ‘Can’t tell’ in response to the questions. Prompts below all but one of the
    questions highlight the issues it is important to consider. Record the reasons for your answers
    in the space provided. As CASP checklists were designed to be used as educational/teaching
    tools in a workshop setting, we do not recommend using a scoring system.

    About CASP Checklists: The CASP RCT checklist was originally based on JAMA Users’ guides to the
    medical literature 1994 (adapted from Guyatt GH, Sackett DL and Cook DJ), and piloted with
    healthcare practitioners. This version has been updated taking into account the CONSORT 2010
    guideline (http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-2010, accessed 16 September 2020).

    Citation: CASP recommends using the Harvard style, i.e. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
    (2020). CASP (insert name of checklist i.e. Randomised Controlled Trial) Checklist. [online]
    Available at: insert URL. Accessed: insert date accessed.

    ©CASP this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial- Share
    A like. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) part of OAP Ltd www.casp-uk.net

    2

    Study and citation: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Section A: Is the basic study design valid for a randomised controlled trial?

    1. Did the study address a clearly focused
    research question?
    CONSIDER:
    Was the study designed to assess the outcomes
    of an intervention?
    Is the research question ‘focused’ in terms of:
    • Population studied
    • Intervention given
    • Comparator chosen
    • Outcomes measured?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o

    2. Was the assignment of participants to
    interventions randomised?
    CONSIDER:
    • How was randomisation carried out? Was

    the method appropriate?
    • Was randomisation sufficient to eliminate

    systematic bias?
    • Was the allocation sequence concealed

    from investigators and participants?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    3. Were all participants who entered the study
    accounted for at its conclusion?
    CONSIDER:
    • Were losses to follow-up and exclusions

    after randomisation accounted for?
    • Were participants analysed in the study

    groups to which they were randomised
    (intention-to-treat analysis)?

    • Was the study stopped early? If so, what
    was the reason?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Section B: Was the study methodologically sound?

    4.
    • Were the participants ‘blind’ to

    intervention they were given?
    • Were the investigators ‘blind’ to the

    intervention they were giving to
    participants?

    • Were the people assessing/analysing
    outcome/s ‘blinded’?

    Yes No Can’t tell

    o o o
    o o

    o o o

    5. Were the study groups similar at the start of
    the randomised controlled trial?
    CONSIDER:
    • Were the baseline characteristics of each

    study group (e.g. age, sex, socio-economic
    group) clearly set out?

    • Were there any differences between the
    study groups that could affect the
    outcome/s?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    3

    6. Apart from the experimental intervention, did
    each study group receive the same level of
    care (that is, were they treated equally)?

    CONSIDER:
    • Was there a clearly defined study protocol?
    • If any additional interventions were given

    (e.g. tests or treatments), were they similar
    between the study groups?

    • Were the follow-up intervals the same for
    each study group?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Section C: What are the results?

    7. Were the effects of intervention reported

    comprehensively?

    CONSIDER:

    •
    • What outcomes were measured, and were

    they clearly specified?
    • How were the results expressed? For

    binary outcomes, were relative and
    absolute effects reported?

    • Were the results reported for each
    outcome in each study group at each
    follow-up interval?

    • Was there any missing or incomplete data?
    • Was there differential drop-out between the

    study groups that could affect the results?
    • Were potential sources of bias identified?
    • Which statistical tests were used?
    • Were p values reported?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    8. Was the precision of the estimate of the
    intervention or treatment effect reported?

    CONSIDER:
    • Were confidence intervals (CIs) reported?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    9. Do the benefits of the experimental
    intervention outweigh the harms and costs?

    CONSIDER:
    • What was the size of the intervention or

    treatment effect?
    • Were harms or unintended effects

    reported for each study group?
    • Was a cost-effectiveness analysis

    undertaken? (Cost-effectiveness analysis
    allows a comparison to be made between
    different interventions used in the care of
    the same condition or problem.)

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Was a power calculation underta en?

    4

    Section D: Will the results help locally?

    10. Can the results be applied to your local
    population/in your context?

    CONSIDER:
    • Are the study participants similar to the

    people in your care?
    • Would any differences between your

    population and the study participants alter
    the outcomes reported in the study?

    • Are the outcomes important to your
    population?

    • Are there any outcomes you would have
    wanted information on that have not been
    studied or reported?

    • Are there any limitations of the study that
    would affect your decision?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    11. Would the experimental intervention provide
    greater value to the people in your care than
    any of the existing interventions?

    CONSIDER:
    • What resources are needed to introduce

    this intervention taking into account time,
    finances, and skills development or training
    needs?

    • Are you able to disinvest resources in one
    or more existing interventions in order to
    be able to re-invest in the new
    intervention?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    APPRAISAL SUMMARY: Record key points from your critical appraisal in this box. What is your
    conclusion about the paper? Would you use it to change your practice or to recommend changes to
    care/interventions used by your organisation? Could you judiciously implement this intervention
    without delay?

    **## Instructions.RCTCriticalAppraisal.docx**

    Instructions: Module 4: Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

    For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article:

    Respond to this prompt following rubric guidelines as posted:

    · State your overall appraisal of this article (include/exclude/seek further info) and
    **provide a rationale** of approximately 2-3 paragraphs, citing evidence from the article, as to why you think the article is appropriate to include or not in the making of a clinically-based decision.  This will be your response to the final question on the CASP RCT Checklist.

    · Complete the
    [CASP RCT Checklist](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4863/files/2831848?wrap=1) [Download CASP RCT Checklist](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4863/files/2831848/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=14495&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F5318bdb7-33d3-48e2-8662-706119293d25%2FCASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-%2520Fillable.pdf%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3NDU4NzA5ODQsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzUzMThiZGI3LTMzZDMtNDhlMi04NjYyLTcwNjExOTI5M2QyNS9DQVNQLVJDVC1DaGVja2xpc3QtUERGLSUyMEZpbGxhYmxlLnBkZiIsImp0aSI6Ijg0ZjRjNWU3LTY3ODUtNDI1MS05OGE0LWE2ZTFiMzg3ZTBkMCIsImhvc3QiOm51bGwsImV4cCI6MTc0NTk1NzM4NH0.ztj_buEjwXwuMxA4dRAb4Acg6hEytXCbFagUj557iMqzEg7dCHKUq00oD7eWRQoX5_7iiVYXXc7B-5jFTbk0AA) critical appraisal tool and use this information to guide your final thoughts on the usefulness of this article.  Be sure to provide examples and support for your responses.  Please do not simply answer "yes" or "no".  You will write your responses directly on the tool.  If you do not have room to write a response, you may write it on a separate page–just identify which question it goes with.  No additional papers are needed for this assignment.

    **RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1)**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section A–Introduction and Basic Study Design | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student introduces the article, evaluates each component of the validity of the basic study design identified on the CASP Checklist, and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section B–Study Methodology | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the study methodology identified on the CASP Cheklslist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section C–Results | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the clarity of the results section identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section D: Clinical Applicability of the Results | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the clinical applicability identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Partially Correct**<br>Only 1 follow-up question is included with the initial post; or questions are uploaded after the initial post is made. | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP Appraisal Summary | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student composes a thoughtful and in-depth response summarizing the article and its applicability to clinical practice. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone** | **2 pts**<br>**The student provides a response that is mainly supported by statements from the appraisal and shows some depth of response. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone with few errors.** | **0 pts**<br>**The response shows no depth and does not adequately provide a summary of the needed information. There are numerous spelling, punctuation, case, or grammatical issues** | | 4 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    **RCTMindfulnessinSchizophrenia.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rctmindfulnessinschizophrenia-pdf-10277463)

    **RCTMindfulnessinSchizophrenia.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rctmindfulnessinschizophrenia-pdf-10277463)

    **## CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable.pdf**

    CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:
    11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)

    Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising a
    randomised controlled trial:

    Is the basic study design valid for a randomised
    controlled trial? (Section A)

    Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)
    What are the results? (Section C)
    Will the results help locally? (Section D)

    The 11 questions in the checklist are designed to help you think about these aspects
    systematically.

    How to use this appraisal tool: The first three questions (Section A) are screening questions
    about the validity of the basic study design and can be answered quickly. If, in light of your
    responses to Section A, you think the study design is valid, continue to Section B to assess
    whether the study was methodologically sound and if it is worth continuing with the appraisal by
    answering the remaining questions in Sections C and D.

    Record ‘Yes’, ‘No’ or ‘Can’t tell’ in response to the questions. Prompts below all but one of the
    questions highlight the issues it is important to consider. Record the reasons for your answers
    in the space provided. As CASP checklists were designed to be used as educational/teaching
    tools in a workshop setting, we do not recommend using a scoring system.

    About CASP Checklists: The CASP RCT checklist was originally based on JAMA Users’ guides to the
    medical literature 1994 (adapted from Guyatt GH, Sackett DL and Cook DJ), and piloted with
    healthcare practitioners. This version has been updated taking into account the CONSORT 2010
    guideline (http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-2010, accessed 16 September 2020).

    Citation: CASP recommends using the Harvard style, i.e. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
    (2020). CASP (insert name of checklist i.e. Randomised Controlled Trial) Checklist. [online]
    Available at: insert URL. Accessed: insert date accessed.

    ©CASP this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial- Share
    A like. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) part of OAP Ltd www.casp-uk.net

    2

    Study and citation: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Section A: Is the basic study design valid for a randomised controlled trial?

    1. Did the study address a clearly focused
    research question?
    CONSIDER:
    Was the study designed to assess the outcomes
    of an intervention?
    Is the research question ‘focused’ in terms of:
    • Population studied
    • Intervention given
    • Comparator chosen
    • Outcomes measured?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o

    2. Was the assignment of participants to
    interventions randomised?
    CONSIDER:
    • How was randomisation carried out? Was

    the method appropriate?
    • Was randomisation sufficient to eliminate

    systematic bias?
    • Was the allocation sequence concealed

    from investigators and participants?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    3. Were all participants who entered the study
    accounted for at its conclusion?
    CONSIDER:
    • Were losses to follow-up and exclusions

    after randomisation accounted for?
    • Were participants analysed in the study

    groups to which they were randomised
    (intention-to-treat analysis)?

    • Was the study stopped early? If so, what
    was the reason?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Section B: Was the study methodologically sound?

    4.
    • Were the participants ‘blind’ to

    intervention they were given?
    • Were the investigators ‘blind’ to the

    intervention they were giving to
    participants?

    • Were the people assessing/analysing
    outcome/s ‘blinded’?

    Yes No Can’t tell

    o o o
    o o

    o o o

    5. Were the study groups similar at the start of
    the randomised controlled trial?
    CONSIDER:
    • Were the baseline characteristics of each

    study group (e.g. age, sex, socio-economic
    group) clearly set out?

    • Were there any differences between the
    study groups that could affect the
    outcome/s?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    3

    6. Apart from the experimental intervention, did
    each study group receive the same level of
    care (that is, were they treated equally)?

    CONSIDER:
    • Was there a clearly defined study protocol?
    • If any additional interventions were given

    (e.g. tests or treatments), were they similar
    between the study groups?

    • Were the follow-up intervals the same for
    each study group?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Section C: What are the results?

    7. Were the effects of intervention reported

    comprehensively?

    CONSIDER:

    •
    • What outcomes were measured, and were

    they clearly specified?
    • How were the results expressed? For

    binary outcomes, were relative and
    absolute effects reported?

    • Were the results reported for each
    outcome in each study group at each
    follow-up interval?

    • Was there any missing or incomplete data?
    • Was there differential drop-out between the

    study groups that could affect the results?
    • Were potential sources of bias identified?
    • Which statistical tests were used?
    • Were p values reported?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    8. Was the precision of the estimate of the
    intervention or treatment effect reported?

    CONSIDER:
    • Were confidence intervals (CIs) reported?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    9. Do the benefits of the experimental
    intervention outweigh the harms and costs?

    CONSIDER:
    • What was the size of the intervention or

    treatment effect?
    • Were harms or unintended effects

    reported for each study group?
    • Was a cost-effectiveness analysis

    undertaken? (Cost-effectiveness analysis
    allows a comparison to be made between
    different interventions used in the care of
    the same condition or problem.)

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Was a power calculation underta en?

    4

    Section D: Will the results help locally?

    10. Can the results be applied to your local
    population/in your context?

    CONSIDER:
    • Are the study participants similar to the

    people in your care?
    • Would any differences between your

    population and the study participants alter
    the outcomes reported in the study?

    • Are the outcomes important to your
    population?

    • Are there any outcomes you would have
    wanted information on that have not been
    studied or reported?

    • Are there any limitations of the study that
    would affect your decision?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    11. Would the experimental intervention provide
    greater value to the people in your care than
    any of the existing interventions?

    CONSIDER:
    • What resources are needed to introduce

    this intervention taking into account time,
    finances, and skills development or training
    needs?

    • Are you able to disinvest resources in one
    or more existing interventions in order to
    be able to re-invest in the new
    intervention?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    APPRAISAL SUMMARY: Record key points from your critical appraisal in this box. What is your
    conclusion about the paper? Would you use it to change your practice or to recommend changes to
    care/interventions used by your organisation? Could you judiciously implement this intervention
    without delay?

    **## Instructions.RCTCriticalAppraisal.docx**

    Instructions: Module 4: Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

    For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article:

    Respond to this prompt following rubric guidelines as posted:

    · State your overall appraisal of this article (include/exclude/seek further info) and
    **provide a rationale** of approximately 2-3 paragraphs, citing evidence from the article, as to why you think the article is appropriate to include or not in the making of a clinically-based decision.  This will be your response to the final question on the CASP RCT Checklist.

    · Complete the
    [CASP RCT Checklist](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4863/files/2831848?wrap=1) [Download CASP RCT Checklist](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4863/files/2831848/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=14495&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F5318bdb7-33d3-48e2-8662-706119293d25%2FCASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-%2520Fillable.pdf%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3NDU4NzA5ODQsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzUzMThiZGI3LTMzZDMtNDhlMi04NjYyLTcwNjExOTI5M2QyNS9DQVNQLVJDVC1DaGVja2xpc3QtUERGLSUyMEZpbGxhYmxlLnBkZiIsImp0aSI6Ijg0ZjRjNWU3LTY3ODUtNDI1MS05OGE0LWE2ZTFiMzg3ZTBkMCIsImhvc3QiOm51bGwsImV4cCI6MTc0NTk1NzM4NH0.ztj_buEjwXwuMxA4dRAb4Acg6hEytXCbFagUj557iMqzEg7dCHKUq00oD7eWRQoX5_7iiVYXXc7B-5jFTbk0AA) critical appraisal tool and use this information to guide your final thoughts on the usefulness of this article.  Be sure to provide examples and support for your responses.  Please do not simply answer "yes" or "no".  You will write your responses directly on the tool.  If you do not have room to write a response, you may write it on a separate page–just identify which question it goes with.  No additional papers are needed for this assignment.

    **RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1)**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section A–Introduction and Basic Study Design | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student introduces the article, evaluates each component of the validity of the basic study design identified on the CASP Checklist, and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section B–Study Methodology | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the study methodology identified on the CASP Cheklslist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section C–Results | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the clarity of the results section identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section D: Clinical Applicability of the Results | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the clinical applicability identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Partially Correct**<br>Only 1 follow-up question is included with the initial post; or questions are uploaded after the initial post is made. | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP Appraisal Summary | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student composes a thoughtful and in-depth response summarizing the article and its applicability to clinical practice. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone** | **2 pts**<br>**The student provides a response that is mainly supported by statements from the appraisal and shows some depth of response. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone with few errors.** | **0 pts**<br>**The response shows no depth and does not adequately provide a summary of the needed information. There are numerous spelling, punctuation, case, or grammatical issues** | | 4 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    **RCTMindfulnessinSchizophrenia.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rctmindfulnessinschizophrenia-pdf-10277463)

    **## CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable.pdf**

    CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:
    11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)

    Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising a
    randomised controlled trial:

    Is the basic study design valid for a randomised
    controlled trial? (Section A)

    Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)
    What are the results? (Section C)
    Will the results help locally? (Section D)

    The 11 questions in the checklist are designed to help you think about these aspects
    systematically.

    How to use this appraisal tool: The first three questions (Section A) are screening questions
    about the validity of the basic study design and can be answered quickly. If, in light of your
    responses to Section A, you think the study design is valid, continue to Section B to assess
    whether the study was methodologically sound and if it is worth continuing with the appraisal by
    answering the remaining questions in Sections C and D.

    Record ‘Yes’, ‘No’ or ‘Can’t tell’ in response to the questions. Prompts below all but one of the
    questions highlight the issues it is important to consider. Record the reasons for your answers
    in the space provided. As CASP checklists were designed to be used as educational/teaching
    tools in a workshop setting, we do not recommend using a scoring system.

    About CASP Checklists: The CASP RCT checklist was originally based on JAMA Users’ guides to the
    medical literature 1994 (adapted from Guyatt GH, Sackett DL and Cook DJ), and piloted with
    healthcare practitioners. This version has been updated taking into account the CONSORT 2010
    guideline (http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-2010, accessed 16 September 2020).

    Citation: CASP recommends using the Harvard style, i.e. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
    (2020). CASP (insert name of checklist i.e. Randomised Controlled Trial) Checklist. [online]
    Available at: insert URL. Accessed: insert date accessed.

    ©CASP this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial- Share
    A like. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

    Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) part of OAP Ltd www.casp-uk.net

    2

    Study and citation: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Section A: Is the basic study design valid for a randomised controlled trial?

    1. Did the study address a clearly focused
    research question?
    CONSIDER:
    Was the study designed to assess the outcomes
    of an intervention?
    Is the research question ‘focused’ in terms of:
    • Population studied
    • Intervention given
    • Comparator chosen
    • Outcomes measured?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o

    2. Was the assignment of participants to
    interventions randomised?
    CONSIDER:
    • How was randomisation carried out? Was

    the method appropriate?
    • Was randomisation sufficient to eliminate

    systematic bias?
    • Was the allocation sequence concealed

    from investigators and participants?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    3. Were all participants who entered the study
    accounted for at its conclusion?
    CONSIDER:
    • Were losses to follow-up and exclusions

    after randomisation accounted for?
    • Were participants analysed in the study

    groups to which they were randomised
    (intention-to-treat analysis)?

    • Was the study stopped early? If so, what
    was the reason?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Section B: Was the study methodologically sound?

    4.
    • Were the participants ‘blind’ to

    intervention they were given?
    • Were the investigators ‘blind’ to the

    intervention they were giving to
    participants?

    • Were the people assessing/analysing
    outcome/s ‘blinded’?

    Yes No Can’t tell

    o o o
    o o

    o o o

    5. Were the study groups similar at the start of
    the randomised controlled trial?
    CONSIDER:
    • Were the baseline characteristics of each

    study group (e.g. age, sex, socio-economic
    group) clearly set out?

    • Were there any differences between the
    study groups that could affect the
    outcome/s?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    3

    6. Apart from the experimental intervention, did
    each study group receive the same level of
    care (that is, were they treated equally)?

    CONSIDER:
    • Was there a clearly defined study protocol?
    • If any additional interventions were given

    (e.g. tests or treatments), were they similar
    between the study groups?

    • Were the follow-up intervals the same for
    each study group?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Section C: What are the results?

    7. Were the effects of intervention reported

    comprehensively?

    CONSIDER:

    •
    • What outcomes were measured, and were

    they clearly specified?
    • How were the results expressed? For

    binary outcomes, were relative and
    absolute effects reported?

    • Were the results reported for each
    outcome in each study group at each
    follow-up interval?

    • Was there any missing or incomplete data?
    • Was there differential drop-out between the

    study groups that could affect the results?
    • Were potential sources of bias identified?
    • Which statistical tests were used?
    • Were p values reported?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    8. Was the precision of the estimate of the
    intervention or treatment effect reported?

    CONSIDER:
    • Were confidence intervals (CIs) reported?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    9. Do the benefits of the experimental
    intervention outweigh the harms and costs?

    CONSIDER:
    • What was the size of the intervention or

    treatment effect?
    • Were harms or unintended effects

    reported for each study group?
    • Was a cost-effectiveness analysis

    undertaken? (Cost-effectiveness analysis
    allows a comparison to be made between
    different interventions used in the care of
    the same condition or problem.)

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    Was a power calculation underta en?

    4

    Section D: Will the results help locally?

    10. Can the results be applied to your local
    population/in your context?

    CONSIDER:
    • Are the study participants similar to the

    people in your care?
    • Would any differences between your

    population and the study participants alter
    the outcomes reported in the study?

    • Are the outcomes important to your
    population?

    • Are there any outcomes you would have
    wanted information on that have not been
    studied or reported?

    • Are there any limitations of the study that
    would affect your decision?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    11. Would the experimental intervention provide
    greater value to the people in your care than
    any of the existing interventions?

    CONSIDER:
    • What resources are needed to introduce

    this intervention taking into account time,
    finances, and skills development or training
    needs?

    • Are you able to disinvest resources in one
    or more existing interventions in order to
    be able to re-invest in the new
    intervention?

    Yes No Can’t tell
    o o o

    APPRAISAL SUMMARY: Record key points from your critical appraisal in this box. What is your
    conclusion about the paper? Would you use it to change your practice or to recommend changes to
    care/interventions used by your organisation? Could you judiciously implement this intervention
    without delay?

    **## Instructions.RCTCriticalAppraisal.docx**

    Instructions: Module 4: Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

    For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article:

    Respond to this prompt following rubric guidelines as posted:

    · State your overall appraisal of this article (include/exclude/seek further info) and
    **provide a rationale** of approximately 2-3 paragraphs, citing evidence from the article, as to why you think the article is appropriate to include or not in the making of a clinically-based decision.  This will be your response to the final question on the CASP RCT Checklist.

    · Complete the
    [CASP RCT Checklist](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4863/files/2831848?wrap=1) [Download CASP RCT Checklist](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4863/files/2831848/download?download_frd=1) [Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader](https://docreader.readspeaker.com/docreader/?cid=14495&lang=en_us&url=https%3A%2F%2Finst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net%2Ffiles%2F5318bdb7-33d3-48e2-8662-706119293d25%2FCASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-%2520Fillable.pdf%3Ftoken%3DeyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE3NDU4NzA5ODQsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsInJlc291cmNlIjoiL2ZpbGVzLzUzMThiZGI3LTMzZDMtNDhlMi04NjYyLTcwNjExOTI5M2QyNS9DQVNQLVJDVC1DaGVja2xpc3QtUERGLSUyMEZpbGxhYmxlLnBkZiIsImp0aSI6Ijg0ZjRjNWU3LTY3ODUtNDI1MS05OGE0LWE2ZTFiMzg3ZTBkMCIsImhvc3QiOm51bGwsImV4cCI6MTc0NTk1NzM4NH0.ztj_buEjwXwuMxA4dRAb4Acg6hEytXCbFagUj557iMqzEg7dCHKUq00oD7eWRQoX5_7iiVYXXc7B-5jFTbk0AA) critical appraisal tool and use this information to guide your final thoughts on the usefulness of this article.  Be sure to provide examples and support for your responses.  Please do not simply answer "yes" or "no".  You will write your responses directly on the tool.  If you do not have room to write a response, you may write it on a separate page–just identify which question it goes with.  No additional papers are needed for this assignment.

    **RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1)**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section A–Introduction and Basic Study Design | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student introduces the article, evaluates each component of the validity of the basic study design identified on the CASP Checklist, and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section B–Study Methodology | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the study methodology identified on the CASP Cheklslist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section C–Results | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the clarity of the results section identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.** | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section D: Clinical Applicability of the Results | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the clinical applicability identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.** | **2 pts**<br>**Partially Correct**<br>Only 1 follow-up question is included with the initial post; or questions are uploaded after the initial post is made. | **0 pts**<br>**More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.** | | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP Appraisal Summary | | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **4 pts**<br>**The student composes a thoughtful and in-depth response summarizing the article and its applicability to clinical practice. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone** | **2 pts**<br>**The student provides a response that is mainly supported by statements from the appraisal and shows some depth of response. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone with few errors.** | **0 pts**<br>**The response shows no depth and does not adequately provide a summary of the needed information. There are numerous spelling, punctuation, case, or grammatical issues** | | 4 pts |
    | Total Points: 20 |

    **RCTMindfulnessinSchizophrenia.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rctmindfulnessinschizophrenia-pdf-10277463)

  • [Solved] PMHNP-URGENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty. – Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your str…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty.
    – Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.
    – Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek; consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

    **In 450–500 words, address the following:**

    **Learning From Experiences**

    – Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.
    – Reflect on the 3 most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?
    – What did you learn from this experience?
    – What resources were available?
    – What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?
    – What would you do differently?
    – How are you managing patient flow and volume?  How can you apply your growing skillset to be a social change agent within your community?

    **Communicating and Feedback**

    – Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.
    – Answer these questions: How am I doing? What is missing?
    – Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

    – [\
    \
    Week11_AssignmentIntructions-Rubrics.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week11-assignmentintructions-rubrics-pdf "Week11_AssignmentIntructions-Rubrics.pdf")

    – a year ago
    – 0.5

  • [Solved] community health nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Being culturally aware and responsive in our interactions and participation of care has become increasing important. The issue of "Cultural Responsiveness" is even more important as we care for groups of people in various communities. You will have many opportunities to improve your cultural skills …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Being culturally aware and responsive in our interactions and participation of care has become increasing important. The issue of "Cultural Responsiveness" is even more important as we care for groups of people in various communities. You will have many opportunities to improve your cultural skills during your Community Health Nursing Clinicals.

    ✅ [Cultural Assessment Guidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YS_bput5mHidHEXRNuRn4oroxIDpg1Lp/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108911107739526541265&rtpof=true&sd=true)

    Choose a client who is from a different culture than yourself. You will conduct an interview, research aspects of the culture that you may not obtain from your client, and write sharing your findings. You will then suggest an effective/appropriate management of care for clients of this particular culture.

    – [\
    \
    CulturalAssessmentGuidelines.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/culturalassessmentguidelines-docx "CulturalAssessmentGuidelines.docx")

    – a year ago

  • [Solved] Approaches to Disease Management: Vaginal Discharge

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal. – What are key points in the history and physical examination? – How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old? – What are similarities and differences in the approach? **Submission In…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal.

    – What are key points in the history and physical examination?
    – How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old?
    – What are similarities and differences in the approach?

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within 5 years 2020-2025

    – a year ago