[Solved] Case study

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf

– casestudy.pdf

**## GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf**

Grading Rubric for Team Case Study Reports
Outstanding full points Good 80% of points Acceptable 60% of points Poor less than 50% of points

Problem and Issue
Identification
(20 points)

Case Report identifies key
facts relevant to case and
show how case facts lead
to a particular focus for
analysis.

Case Report
identifies most, but
not all key facts
relevant to the case
and ties facts to a
particular focus for
the analysis.

Case Report identifies
most, but not all key facts
relevant to the case and
ties facts to a particular
focus for the analysis.

Case Report misses most
significant key facts of case
or ties them to an incorrect
focus for case analysis.

Analysis
(40 points)

Report explores trends in
general environment to
predict future
environmental concerns.
Key competitors are
analyzed for strategy, core
competencies, and
competitive response.

Two or three minor
elements of analysis
are incorrect – team
may not have
covered all factors or
analyzed key
competitors
completely.

Two or three elements of
analysis are incorrect –
team may not have
covered all factors or
analyzed key competitors
completely.

Analysis is significantly
incorrect – factors are
incorrectly identified, areas
of analysis are missing or
incomplete and key
competitors either not
identified or analysis is
superficial.

Formulation of
Alternatives and Selected
Recommendation
(20 points)

Report contains three to
four alternative strategies
that are feasible and take
advantage of
opportunities and avoid
threats. Strategies are
clearly linked to analysis.
An analysis of the
alternatives tells why the
recommendation is the
best.

Report contains at
least three strategies
that are linked to
analysis. Information
is given about why
the recommendation
is better than other
strategies, but logic,
while reasonable,
may not be entirely
laid out.

Report contains less than
three strategies that are
linked to analysis. Some
information is given about
why the recommendation
is better than other
strategies, but the logic is
not very clearly laid out.

Report contains fewer than
tw0 alternative strategies.
Strategies are not clearly
linked to analysis, or are
incorrect based on analysis
(for example, marketing a
product that is a competitive
advantage for another
company.)

Implementation of
Recommendation
(20 points)

Report explicitly outlines
and explains what steps
must be taken to
implement chosen
strategy, including
structural or leadership

Report covers key
steps needed to
implement chosen
strategy but may not
cover all steps.
Recommendation

Report covers some steps
needed to implement
chosen strategy.
Recommendation’s
connection to analysis is
not completely clear.

Report does not include key
implementation steps
needed to put strategy into
practice, and/or little or no
rationale is given for

changes.
Recommendations flow
from analysis.

generally connected
to analysis – may not
provide all specifics.

suggested implementation
practices.

Process Issues
(20 points)

Report is logically
consistent. Alternatives
and recommendation flow
from analysis.
Report/presentation is
thorough and clear,
containing a
comprehensive analysis
and clean links between
analysis and
recommendations.

Report contains
generally clear and
logical analysis. It is
complete, although
more information is
needed to make it as
thorough as it should
be.
Recommendations
are generally
feasible, but more
information would
help show how they
flow from analysis.

Report contains logical
analysis that is only
somewhat clear. It is not
complete, much more
information is needed to
make it as thorough as it
should be. Little
information is provided
about how
recommendations flow
from analysis.

Report is not logically
consistent. Little information
is given that helps reader
know why recommendations
are given, or
recommendations don’t flow
from other information.
Report/presentation does
not have clarity of purpose.

**casestudy.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/casestudy-pdf-10468581)

**casestudy.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/casestudy-pdf-10468581)

**## GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf**

Grading Rubric for Team Case Study Reports
Outstanding full points Good 80% of points Acceptable 60% of points Poor less than 50% of points

Problem and Issue
Identification
(20 points)

Case Report identifies key
facts relevant to case and
show how case facts lead
to a particular focus for
analysis.

Case Report
identifies most, but
not all key facts
relevant to the case
and ties facts to a
particular focus for
the analysis.

Case Report identifies
most, but not all key facts
relevant to the case and
ties facts to a particular
focus for the analysis.

Case Report misses most
significant key facts of case
or ties them to an incorrect
focus for case analysis.

Analysis
(40 points)

Report explores trends in
general environment to
predict future
environmental concerns.
Key competitors are
analyzed for strategy, core
competencies, and
competitive response.

Two or three minor
elements of analysis
are incorrect – team
may not have
covered all factors or
analyzed key
competitors
completely.

Two or three elements of
analysis are incorrect –
team may not have
covered all factors or
analyzed key competitors
completely.

Analysis is significantly
incorrect – factors are
incorrectly identified, areas
of analysis are missing or
incomplete and key
competitors either not
identified or analysis is
superficial.

Formulation of
Alternatives and Selected
Recommendation
(20 points)

Report contains three to
four alternative strategies
that are feasible and take
advantage of
opportunities and avoid
threats. Strategies are
clearly linked to analysis.
An analysis of the
alternatives tells why the
recommendation is the
best.

Report contains at
least three strategies
that are linked to
analysis. Information
is given about why
the recommendation
is better than other
strategies, but logic,
while reasonable,
may not be entirely
laid out.

Report contains less than
three strategies that are
linked to analysis. Some
information is given about
why the recommendation
is better than other
strategies, but the logic is
not very clearly laid out.

Report contains fewer than
tw0 alternative strategies.
Strategies are not clearly
linked to analysis, or are
incorrect based on analysis
(for example, marketing a
product that is a competitive
advantage for another
company.)

Implementation of
Recommendation
(20 points)

Report explicitly outlines
and explains what steps
must be taken to
implement chosen
strategy, including
structural or leadership

Report covers key
steps needed to
implement chosen
strategy but may not
cover all steps.
Recommendation

Report covers some steps
needed to implement
chosen strategy.
Recommendation’s
connection to analysis is
not completely clear.

Report does not include key
implementation steps
needed to put strategy into
practice, and/or little or no
rationale is given for

changes.
Recommendations flow
from analysis.

generally connected
to analysis – may not
provide all specifics.

suggested implementation
practices.

Process Issues
(20 points)

Report is logically
consistent. Alternatives
and recommendation flow
from analysis.
Report/presentation is
thorough and clear,
containing a
comprehensive analysis
and clean links between
analysis and
recommendations.

Report contains
generally clear and
logical analysis. It is
complete, although
more information is
needed to make it as
thorough as it should
be.
Recommendations
are generally
feasible, but more
information would
help show how they
flow from analysis.

Report contains logical
analysis that is only
somewhat clear. It is not
complete, much more
information is needed to
make it as thorough as it
should be. Little
information is provided
about how
recommendations flow
from analysis.

Report is not logically
consistent. Little information
is given that helps reader
know why recommendations
are given, or
recommendations don’t flow
from other information.
Report/presentation does
not have clarity of purpose.

**casestudy.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/casestudy-pdf-10468581)

**## GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf**

Grading Rubric for Team Case Study Reports
Outstanding full points Good 80% of points Acceptable 60% of points Poor less than 50% of points

Problem and Issue
Identification
(20 points)

Case Report identifies key
facts relevant to case and
show how case facts lead
to a particular focus for
analysis.

Case Report
identifies most, but
not all key facts
relevant to the case
and ties facts to a
particular focus for
the analysis.

Case Report identifies
most, but not all key facts
relevant to the case and
ties facts to a particular
focus for the analysis.

Case Report misses most
significant key facts of case
or ties them to an incorrect
focus for case analysis.

Analysis
(40 points)

Report explores trends in
general environment to
predict future
environmental concerns.
Key competitors are
analyzed for strategy, core
competencies, and
competitive response.

Two or three minor
elements of analysis
are incorrect – team
may not have
covered all factors or
analyzed key
competitors
completely.

Two or three elements of
analysis are incorrect –
team may not have
covered all factors or
analyzed key competitors
completely.

Analysis is significantly
incorrect – factors are
incorrectly identified, areas
of analysis are missing or
incomplete and key
competitors either not
identified or analysis is
superficial.

Formulation of
Alternatives and Selected
Recommendation
(20 points)

Report contains three to
four alternative strategies
that are feasible and take
advantage of
opportunities and avoid
threats. Strategies are
clearly linked to analysis.
An analysis of the
alternatives tells why the
recommendation is the
best.

Report contains at
least three strategies
that are linked to
analysis. Information
is given about why
the recommendation
is better than other
strategies, but logic,
while reasonable,
may not be entirely
laid out.

Report contains less than
three strategies that are
linked to analysis. Some
information is given about
why the recommendation
is better than other
strategies, but the logic is
not very clearly laid out.

Report contains fewer than
tw0 alternative strategies.
Strategies are not clearly
linked to analysis, or are
incorrect based on analysis
(for example, marketing a
product that is a competitive
advantage for another
company.)

Implementation of
Recommendation
(20 points)

Report explicitly outlines
and explains what steps
must be taken to
implement chosen
strategy, including
structural or leadership

Report covers key
steps needed to
implement chosen
strategy but may not
cover all steps.
Recommendation

Report covers some steps
needed to implement
chosen strategy.
Recommendation’s
connection to analysis is
not completely clear.

Report does not include key
implementation steps
needed to put strategy into
practice, and/or little or no
rationale is given for

changes.
Recommendations flow
from analysis.

generally connected
to analysis – may not
provide all specifics.

suggested implementation
practices.

Process Issues
(20 points)

Report is logically
consistent. Alternatives
and recommendation flow
from analysis.
Report/presentation is
thorough and clear,
containing a
comprehensive analysis
and clean links between
analysis and
recommendations.

Report contains
generally clear and
logical analysis. It is
complete, although
more information is
needed to make it as
thorough as it should
be.
Recommendations
are generally
feasible, but more
information would
help show how they
flow from analysis.

Report contains logical
analysis that is only
somewhat clear. It is not
complete, much more
information is needed to
make it as thorough as it
should be. Little
information is provided
about how
recommendations flow
from analysis.

Report is not logically
consistent. Little information
is given that helps reader
know why recommendations
are given, or
recommendations don’t flow
from other information.
Report/presentation does
not have clarity of purpose.

**casestudy.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/casestudy-pdf-10468581)

– 1
– 2