[Solved] The Case Study case study 2

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

The Case Study  case study 2

**files (2)**

– ## CaseStudy2.docx

– ## CaseStudy2-Rubric.pdf

**## CaseStudy2.docx**

**Part I – The Case Study**

Sarah Pam, a 12-year-old Native-American CIS female, exhibits a range of symptoms that has occurred over the last year. She is consistently plagued by worry and experiences heightened anxiety when her parents leave her with a babysitter.  She seems to be on edge and always feels something wrong will happen. After witnessing a car accident on the news, she has developed a fear that her parents will also experience a similar fate. This state of unease causes her to be on edge and hampers her ability to concentrate. Her anxiety has led to failure on two exams as she experiences blankness and difficulty focusing. Notably, a history of general anxiety is present within her family, with both her mother and father having undergone treatment for similar issues.

**Questions:(Use APA format; please use the questions for the heading and answers below; please cite work; minimum of 4 scholarly peer-reviewed references, North American only )**

· What diagnosis best describes what may be happening to Sarah?

· What neurotransmitters are involved with her current symptoms?

· What classification of medications would best treat her symptoms?

· Choose one medication from the chosen class and provide the following:

· FDA Approvals

· Mechanism of action

· Time frame pt. should see results.

· Common Side effects

· Life-threatening side effects:

· Starting Dose, you picked and why

· Common Labs, baseline vitals collected. Provide reasoning.

**Part II – The Assignment**

· Please record yourself providing patient education on the medication you decided to you to utilize.

· You will speak to the camera as if you are speaking to the patient, with regard, care, and no medical jargon.

· This video is to be a maximum of 2 min and will be uploaded via Canvas.

· There is a written case study answering the above questions; please cite your paper.

**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the Rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

Stahl, S. M. (2021). Stahl's essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

**## CaseStudy2-Rubric.pdf**

Cae Study Rubric

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 1/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Diagnostic
Evaluation

5 pts

Pharmacological
Interventions

5 pts

Writing and
Presentation

5 pts

5 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly and
accurately describes
the diagnostic
process, including
relevant assessments
and tools used.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis

4 pts
Proficient
Describes the
diagnostic process
and utilizes
appropriate
assessments, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated.
Displays a solid
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis.

3 pts
Competent
Describes the
diagnostic process
and assessments
used, but the
description may lack
depth, or some
assessments could be
better explained.

3 pts
Developing
Provides a basic
overview of the
diagnostic process,
with limited details on
assessments and
tools used.
Understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is basic.

1 pts
Limited
The diagnostic
evaluation is vague or
missing key details,
and understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is lacking.

5 pts
Exemplary
Provides a
comprehensive and
well-justified
discussion of
pharmacological
options.
Demonstrates an in-
depth understanding
of medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

4 pts
Proficient
Discusses
pharmacological
options with
appropriate
justifications. Provides
clear insights into
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

3 pts
Competent
Discusses
pharmacological
options, but the
justification or depth
of understanding
could be improved.
Some aspects of
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects may be
missing.

2 pts
Developing
The discussion of
pharmacological
options lacks depth or
adequate justification.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects are unclear.

1 pts
Limited
The discussion of
pharmacological
interventions is
minimal or absent.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects are not
addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Exceptional writing
style, organization,

4 pts
Proficient
Well-written and
organized, with minor

3 pts
Competent
Writing is generally
clear but may contain

2 pts
Developing
Writing style is unclear
or contains significant

1 pts
Limited
Writing is incoherent
or unreadable, and

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 2/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Patient
Education

5 pts

Overall
Assessment

5 pts

and clarity. Proper use
of academic
language. Formatting
and referencing
adhere to the required
style guide.

lapses in writing style
or formatting.
Citations and
references are mostly
consistent with the
required style guide.

errors or
inconsistencies in
style and formatting.
Citations and
references are
somewhat
inconsistent.

errors, detracting from
the overall
presentation. Citations
and references are
inconsistent or
incorrect.

formatting, citations,
and references are
severely flawed

5 pts
Exemplary
Presents a
comprehensive and
clear plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
patient education
principles.

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a good
understanding of
patient education
principles.

3 pts
Competent
Presents a plan for
patient education, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated
or clarified.
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of
patient education
principles.

2 pts
Developing
Presents a
rudimentary plan for
patient education, with
limited details or
understanding of
patient education
principles.

1 pts
Limited
The plan for patient
education is
inadequate or
missing, and patient
education principles
are not addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, strong
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a solid
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with good
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education
principles. Meets

3 pts
Competent
Demonstrates a
satisfactory
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, but
analytical skills,
critical thinking, or
patient education

2 pts
Developing
Shows a limited
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with
minimal analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles. Falls below

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 3/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Total Points: 25

principles. Answers all
questions. Fully meets
or exceeds
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

principles could be
further developed.
Approaches
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

1 pts
Limited
Fails to demonstrate a
meaningful
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles.

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 4/4

**## CaseStudy2-Rubric.pdf**

Cae Study Rubric

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 1/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Diagnostic
Evaluation

5 pts

Pharmacological
Interventions

5 pts

Writing and
Presentation

5 pts

5 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly and
accurately describes
the diagnostic
process, including
relevant assessments
and tools used.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis

4 pts
Proficient
Describes the
diagnostic process
and utilizes
appropriate
assessments, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated.
Displays a solid
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis.

3 pts
Competent
Describes the
diagnostic process
and assessments
used, but the
description may lack
depth, or some
assessments could be
better explained.

3 pts
Developing
Provides a basic
overview of the
diagnostic process,
with limited details on
assessments and
tools used.
Understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is basic.

1 pts
Limited
The diagnostic
evaluation is vague or
missing key details,
and understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is lacking.

5 pts
Exemplary
Provides a
comprehensive and
well-justified
discussion of
pharmacological
options.
Demonstrates an in-
depth understanding
of medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

4 pts
Proficient
Discusses
pharmacological
options with
appropriate
justifications. Provides
clear insights into
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

3 pts
Competent
Discusses
pharmacological
options, but the
justification or depth
of understanding
could be improved.
Some aspects of
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects may be
missing.

2 pts
Developing
The discussion of
pharmacological
options lacks depth or
adequate justification.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects are unclear.

1 pts
Limited
The discussion of
pharmacological
interventions is
minimal or absent.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects are not
addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Exceptional writing
style, organization,

4 pts
Proficient
Well-written and
organized, with minor

3 pts
Competent
Writing is generally
clear but may contain

2 pts
Developing
Writing style is unclear
or contains significant

1 pts
Limited
Writing is incoherent
or unreadable, and

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 2/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Patient
Education

5 pts

Overall
Assessment

5 pts

and clarity. Proper use
of academic
language. Formatting
and referencing
adhere to the required
style guide.

lapses in writing style
or formatting.
Citations and
references are mostly
consistent with the
required style guide.

errors or
inconsistencies in
style and formatting.
Citations and
references are
somewhat
inconsistent.

errors, detracting from
the overall
presentation. Citations
and references are
inconsistent or
incorrect.

formatting, citations,
and references are
severely flawed

5 pts
Exemplary
Presents a
comprehensive and
clear plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
patient education
principles.

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a good
understanding of
patient education
principles.

3 pts
Competent
Presents a plan for
patient education, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated
or clarified.
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of
patient education
principles.

2 pts
Developing
Presents a
rudimentary plan for
patient education, with
limited details or
understanding of
patient education
principles.

1 pts
Limited
The plan for patient
education is
inadequate or
missing, and patient
education principles
are not addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, strong
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a solid
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with good
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education
principles. Meets

3 pts
Competent
Demonstrates a
satisfactory
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, but
analytical skills,
critical thinking, or
patient education

2 pts
Developing
Shows a limited
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with
minimal analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles. Falls below

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 3/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Total Points: 25

principles. Answers all
questions. Fully meets
or exceeds
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

principles could be
further developed.
Approaches
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

1 pts
Limited
Fails to demonstrate a
meaningful
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles.

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 4/4

**## CaseStudy2.docx**

**Part I – The Case Study**

Sarah Pam, a 12-year-old Native-American CIS female, exhibits a range of symptoms that has occurred over the last year. She is consistently plagued by worry and experiences heightened anxiety when her parents leave her with a babysitter.  She seems to be on edge and always feels something wrong will happen. After witnessing a car accident on the news, she has developed a fear that her parents will also experience a similar fate. This state of unease causes her to be on edge and hampers her ability to concentrate. Her anxiety has led to failure on two exams as she experiences blankness and difficulty focusing. Notably, a history of general anxiety is present within her family, with both her mother and father having undergone treatment for similar issues.

**Questions:(Use APA format; please use the questions for the heading and answers below; please cite work; minimum of 4 scholarly peer-reviewed references, North American only )**

· What diagnosis best describes what may be happening to Sarah?

· What neurotransmitters are involved with her current symptoms?

· What classification of medications would best treat her symptoms?

· Choose one medication from the chosen class and provide the following:

· FDA Approvals

· Mechanism of action

· Time frame pt. should see results.

· Common Side effects

· Life-threatening side effects:

· Starting Dose, you picked and why

· Common Labs, baseline vitals collected. Provide reasoning.

**Part II – The Assignment**

· Please record yourself providing patient education on the medication you decided to you to utilize.

· You will speak to the camera as if you are speaking to the patient, with regard, care, and no medical jargon.

· This video is to be a maximum of 2 min and will be uploaded via Canvas.

· There is a written case study answering the above questions; please cite your paper.

**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the Rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

Stahl, S. M. (2021). Stahl's essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

**## CaseStudy2-Rubric.pdf**

Cae Study Rubric

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 1/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Diagnostic
Evaluation

5 pts

Pharmacological
Interventions

5 pts

Writing and
Presentation

5 pts

5 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly and
accurately describes
the diagnostic
process, including
relevant assessments
and tools used.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis

4 pts
Proficient
Describes the
diagnostic process
and utilizes
appropriate
assessments, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated.
Displays a solid
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis.

3 pts
Competent
Describes the
diagnostic process
and assessments
used, but the
description may lack
depth, or some
assessments could be
better explained.

3 pts
Developing
Provides a basic
overview of the
diagnostic process,
with limited details on
assessments and
tools used.
Understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is basic.

1 pts
Limited
The diagnostic
evaluation is vague or
missing key details,
and understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is lacking.

5 pts
Exemplary
Provides a
comprehensive and
well-justified
discussion of
pharmacological
options.
Demonstrates an in-
depth understanding
of medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

4 pts
Proficient
Discusses
pharmacological
options with
appropriate
justifications. Provides
clear insights into
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

3 pts
Competent
Discusses
pharmacological
options, but the
justification or depth
of understanding
could be improved.
Some aspects of
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects may be
missing.

2 pts
Developing
The discussion of
pharmacological
options lacks depth or
adequate justification.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects are unclear.

1 pts
Limited
The discussion of
pharmacological
interventions is
minimal or absent.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects are not
addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Exceptional writing
style, organization,

4 pts
Proficient
Well-written and
organized, with minor

3 pts
Competent
Writing is generally
clear but may contain

2 pts
Developing
Writing style is unclear
or contains significant

1 pts
Limited
Writing is incoherent
or unreadable, and

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 2/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Patient
Education

5 pts

Overall
Assessment

5 pts

and clarity. Proper use
of academic
language. Formatting
and referencing
adhere to the required
style guide.

lapses in writing style
or formatting.
Citations and
references are mostly
consistent with the
required style guide.

errors or
inconsistencies in
style and formatting.
Citations and
references are
somewhat
inconsistent.

errors, detracting from
the overall
presentation. Citations
and references are
inconsistent or
incorrect.

formatting, citations,
and references are
severely flawed

5 pts
Exemplary
Presents a
comprehensive and
clear plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
patient education
principles.

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a good
understanding of
patient education
principles.

3 pts
Competent
Presents a plan for
patient education, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated
or clarified.
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of
patient education
principles.

2 pts
Developing
Presents a
rudimentary plan for
patient education, with
limited details or
understanding of
patient education
principles.

1 pts
Limited
The plan for patient
education is
inadequate or
missing, and patient
education principles
are not addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, strong
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a solid
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with good
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education
principles. Meets

3 pts
Competent
Demonstrates a
satisfactory
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, but
analytical skills,
critical thinking, or
patient education

2 pts
Developing
Shows a limited
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with
minimal analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles. Falls below

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 3/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Total Points: 25

principles. Answers all
questions. Fully meets
or exceeds
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

principles could be
further developed.
Approaches
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

1 pts
Limited
Fails to demonstrate a
meaningful
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles.

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 4/4

**## CaseStudy2.docx**

**Part I – The Case Study**

Sarah Pam, a 12-year-old Native-American CIS female, exhibits a range of symptoms that has occurred over the last year. She is consistently plagued by worry and experiences heightened anxiety when her parents leave her with a babysitter.  She seems to be on edge and always feels something wrong will happen. After witnessing a car accident on the news, she has developed a fear that her parents will also experience a similar fate. This state of unease causes her to be on edge and hampers her ability to concentrate. Her anxiety has led to failure on two exams as she experiences blankness and difficulty focusing. Notably, a history of general anxiety is present within her family, with both her mother and father having undergone treatment for similar issues.

**Questions:(Use APA format; please use the questions for the heading and answers below; please cite work; minimum of 4 scholarly peer-reviewed references, North American only )**

· What diagnosis best describes what may be happening to Sarah?

· What neurotransmitters are involved with her current symptoms?

· What classification of medications would best treat her symptoms?

· Choose one medication from the chosen class and provide the following:

· FDA Approvals

· Mechanism of action

· Time frame pt. should see results.

· Common Side effects

· Life-threatening side effects:

· Starting Dose, you picked and why

· Common Labs, baseline vitals collected. Provide reasoning.

**Part II – The Assignment**

· Please record yourself providing patient education on the medication you decided to you to utilize.

· You will speak to the camera as if you are speaking to the patient, with regard, care, and no medical jargon.

· This video is to be a maximum of 2 min and will be uploaded via Canvas.

· There is a written case study answering the above questions; please cite your paper.

**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the Rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**

Stahl, S. M. (2021). Stahl's essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

**## CaseStudy2-Rubric.pdf**

Cae Study Rubric

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 1/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Diagnostic
Evaluation

5 pts

Pharmacological
Interventions

5 pts

Writing and
Presentation

5 pts

5 pts
Exemplary
Thoroughly and
accurately describes
the diagnostic
process, including
relevant assessments
and tools used.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis

4 pts
Proficient
Describes the
diagnostic process
and utilizes
appropriate
assessments, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated.
Displays a solid
understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis.

3 pts
Competent
Describes the
diagnostic process
and assessments
used, but the
description may lack
depth, or some
assessments could be
better explained.

3 pts
Developing
Provides a basic
overview of the
diagnostic process,
with limited details on
assessments and
tools used.
Understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is basic.

1 pts
Limited
The diagnostic
evaluation is vague or
missing key details,
and understanding of
psychiatric diagnosis
is lacking.

5 pts
Exemplary
Provides a
comprehensive and
well-justified
discussion of
pharmacological
options.
Demonstrates an in-
depth understanding
of medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

4 pts
Proficient
Discusses
pharmacological
options with
appropriate
justifications. Provides
clear insights into
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects.

3 pts
Competent
Discusses
pharmacological
options, but the
justification or depth
of understanding
could be improved.
Some aspects of
medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects may be
missing.

2 pts
Developing
The discussion of
pharmacological
options lacks depth or
adequate justification.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, or side
effects are unclear.

1 pts
Limited
The discussion of
pharmacological
interventions is
minimal or absent.
Medication
mechanisms,
interactions, and side
effects are not
addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Exceptional writing
style, organization,

4 pts
Proficient
Well-written and
organized, with minor

3 pts
Competent
Writing is generally
clear but may contain

2 pts
Developing
Writing style is unclear
or contains significant

1 pts
Limited
Writing is incoherent
or unreadable, and

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 2/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Patient
Education

5 pts

Overall
Assessment

5 pts

and clarity. Proper use
of academic
language. Formatting
and referencing
adhere to the required
style guide.

lapses in writing style
or formatting.
Citations and
references are mostly
consistent with the
required style guide.

errors or
inconsistencies in
style and formatting.
Citations and
references are
somewhat
inconsistent.

errors, detracting from
the overall
presentation. Citations
and references are
inconsistent or
incorrect.

formatting, citations,
and references are
severely flawed

5 pts
Exemplary
Presents a
comprehensive and
clear plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of
patient education
principles.

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a plan for
educating the patient
about their treatment
options, medication
usage, potential side
effects, and
adherence strategies.
Demonstrates a good
understanding of
patient education
principles.

3 pts
Competent
Presents a plan for
patient education, but
some aspects could
be further elaborated
or clarified.
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of
patient education
principles.

2 pts
Developing
Presents a
rudimentary plan for
patient education, with
limited details or
understanding of
patient education
principles.

1 pts
Limited
The plan for patient
education is
inadequate or
missing, and patient
education principles
are not addressed.

5 pts
Exemplary
Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, strong
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education

4 pts
Proficient
Presents a solid
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with good
analytical skills,
critical thinking, and
patient education
principles. Meets

3 pts
Competent
Demonstrates a
satisfactory
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, but
analytical skills,
critical thinking, or
patient education

2 pts
Developing
Shows a limited
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, with
minimal analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles. Falls below

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 3/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

Total Points: 25

principles. Answers all
questions. Fully meets
or exceeds
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

principles could be
further developed.
Approaches
expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

expectations for a
graduate-level
assignment.

1 pts
Limited
Fails to demonstrate a
meaningful
understanding of
psychopharmacology
concepts, analytical
skills, critical thinking,
or patient education
principles.

10/18/26, 6:35 PM Case Study #2

https://dyc.instructure.com/courses/52441/assignments/452940?module_item_id=1196152 4/4