Category: Education

  • [Solved] Catherine Owens

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Catherine Owens.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] revising

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Reflect on a recent writing project where you had to make significant revisions. Share the techniques you used to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of your writing. Include a diagram illustrating your revision process. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Reflect on a recent writing project where you had to make significant revisions. Share the techniques you used to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of your writing. Include a diagram illustrating your revision process.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Formatting

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Have you ever had any confusion concerning what exactly can constitute plagiarism, and what doesn’t? What new information did you gain from the previous reading's on plagiarism and research? 2. How might you best avoid plagiarism in the future? 3. Why is academic honesty an important issue, not j…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. Have you ever had any confusion concerning what exactly can constitute plagiarism, and what doesn’t? What new information did you gain from the previous reading's on plagiarism and research?
    2. How might you best avoid plagiarism in the future?
    3. Why is academic honesty an important issue, not just for students but for the entire academic community?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] madame michelle

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering madame michelle.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Catherine Owens

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Catherine Owens.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Education I need help with homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    need help with homework – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## RequriedReferenncesforweek1assignment.docx – ## Week1assignment.docx – ## PlanningReadingInstruction.docx **## RequriedReferenncesforweek1assignment.docx** **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools** **Required** Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    need help with homework

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## RequriedReferenncesforweek1assignment.docx

    – ## Week1assignment.docx

    – ## PlanningReadingInstruction.docx

    **## RequriedReferenncesforweek1assignment.docx**

    **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

    **Required**

    Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
    _Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

    Classroom Reading Instruction That Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching

    **Required**

    Read “Classroom Reading Instruction That Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching,” by Denton, loca

    … Read More

    http://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredinstruction/tier1/effectiveteaching

    The Sciences of Reading Instruction

    **Required**

    Read “The Sciences of Reading Instruction” by Gabriel from
    _Educational Leadership_ (2021).

    https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=150174239&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

    4 Reading Strategies to Retire This Year (Plus 6 to Try Out !)

    **Required**

    Read “4 Reading Strategies to Retire This Year (Plus 6 to Try Out!),” by Gonser, located on the Edutopia website (2021).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/4-reading-strategies-retire-year-plus-6-try-out

    Reading Methods for Students with LD

    **Required**

    Read “Reading Methods for Students with LD” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/learning-disabilities/articles/reading-methods-students-ld

    A Powerful Approach to Reading Instruction

    **Required**

    Read “A Powerful Approach to Reading Instruction,” by Hamman, located on the Edutopia website (2018).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/powerful-approach-reading-instruction

    Strategies that Promote Comprehension

    **Required**

    Read “Strategies that Promote Comprehension” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/background-knowledge/articles/strategies-promote-comprehension

    Classroom Strategy Library

    **Required**

    Explore the “Classroom Strategy Library” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/classroom/classroom-strategies

    Reading and Writing Strategies

    **Required**

    Explore “Reading and Writing Strategies,” located on the AdLit website.

    https://www.adlit.org/in-the-classroom/strategies

    The New Literacies

    **Required**

    Read “The New Literacies” by Miners and Pascopella on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/t

    **## Week1assignment.docx**

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    There are various approaches to teaching reading and numerous instructional strategies that educators can use to engage students in reading and comprehending narrative and informational texts. It is critical for student success for teachers to understand reading standards and to plan effective, standards-based reading instruction that is supportive of all learners. Additionally, teachers must align their assessments to the standards and instruction to provide appropriate opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery.

    Utilize the “Planning Reading Instruction” template to complete the topic assignment.

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    Identify three approaches/methods (reading workshop, whole class reading of a core book, literature circles, sustained silent reading, etc.) to teaching reading and provide a 50-75 word description of each.

    **Part 2: Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    Write at least one measurable, developmentally appropriate learning objective for each of the provided reading standards.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    Create a whole group reading lesson based on one of the standards and learning objectives in Part 2. Design differentiated activities that support the standard and learning objective that students can engage in before reading a text, while reading the text, and after reading the text.

    Support the template with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric Criteria**

    expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    Approaches to reading instruction and descriptions are advanced and comprehensive.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    Approaches to reading instruction and descriptions are accurate and complete.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Learning Objectives**

    13 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Learning Objectives

    **5. Target**

    13 points

    Learning objectives are discerningly measurable and proficiently align with the standards.

    **4. Acceptable**

    11.31 points

    Learning objectives are clearly measurable and reasonably align with the standards.

    **3. Approaching**

    9.62 points

    Learning objectives lack clear measurability and/or vaguely align with the standards.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Lesson**

    13 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Whole Group Lesson

    **5. Target**

    13 points

    Explanation of how information will be presented to students is specific. Descriptions of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities that will be used to engage students in practicing and applying the learning objective are novel and purposeful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    11.31 points

    Explanation of how information will be presented to students is clear. Descriptions of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities that will be used to engage students in practicing and applying the learning objective are appropriate.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Differentiation**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Differentiation

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are meaningful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are suitable.

    **3. Approaching**

    7.22 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are artificial.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Assessment**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Assessment

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    The formative and summative assessments are sophisticated and skillfully align with the learning objective.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    The formative and summative assessments are solid and effectively align with the learning objective.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    **## PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20897625)_

    **Planning Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Approach** | **Description of Approach** |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Part 2:** **Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Literature** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions). | |
    | 8th Grade: Analyze how differences in the points of view of the characters and the audience or reader (e.g., created through the use of dramatic irony) create such effects as suspense or humor. | |
    | **Informational** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text. | |
    | 8th Grade: Determine an author's point of view, perspective and purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints. | |

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Grade Level** | |
    | **National/State Reading Standard**<br>_Identify one of the reading standards from Part 2 that will be the focus of the lesson. Standards must align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments._ | |
    | **Specific Learning Target(s)/Objective(s)**<br>_Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards._ | |
    | **Whole Group Lesson**<br>_Explain how information will be presented to students and describe activities you will use to engage students in practicing and applying the learning target/objective before reading, during reading, and after reading the core text._ | Pre-reading:<br>During Reading: <br>Post-reading: |
    | **Differentiation**<br>_Explain strategies to differentiate the whole group lesson to support each group of students._ | English Language Learners:<br>Students with Disabilities:<br>Students with Gifted Abilities:<br>Early Finishers: |
    | **Assessment**<br>_Explain one formative assessment that will be used to gauge student learning throughout the lesson that provides meaningful feedback. Additionally, provide a summative assessment to be used at the end of the lesson to allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery of the learning target/objective._ | Formative Assessment:<br>Summative Assessment: |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20897625)_

    **Planning Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Approach** | **Description of Approach** |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Part 2:** **Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Literature** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions). | |
    | 8th Grade: Analyze how differences in the points of view of the characters and the audience or reader (e.g., created through the use of dramatic irony) create such effects as suspense or humor. | |
    | **Informational** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text. | |
    | 8th Grade: Determine an author's point of view, perspective and purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints. | |

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Grade Level** | |
    | **National/State Reading Standard**<br>_Identify one of the reading standards from Part 2 that will be the focus of the lesson. Standards must align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments._ | |
    | **Specific Learning Target(s)/Objective(s)**<br>_Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards._ | |
    | **Whole Group Lesson**<br>_Explain how information will be presented to students and describe activities you will use to engage students in practicing and applying the learning target/objective before reading, during reading, and after reading the core text._ | Pre-reading:<br>During Reading: <br>Post-reading: |
    | **Differentiation**<br>_Explain strategies to differentiate the whole group lesson to support each group of students._ | English Language Learners:<br>Students with Disabilities:<br>Students with Gifted Abilities:<br>Early Finishers: |
    | **Assessment**<br>_Explain one formative assessment that will be used to gauge student learning throughout the lesson that provides meaningful feedback. Additionally, provide a summative assessment to be used at the end of the lesson to allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery of the learning target/objective._ | Formative Assessment:<br>Summative Assessment: |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## RequriedReferenncesforweek1assignment.docx**

    **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

    **Required**

    Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
    _Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

    Classroom Reading Instruction That Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching

    **Required**

    Read “Classroom Reading Instruction That Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching,” by Denton, loca

    … Read More

    http://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredinstruction/tier1/effectiveteaching

    The Sciences of Reading Instruction

    **Required**

    Read “The Sciences of Reading Instruction” by Gabriel from
    _Educational Leadership_ (2021).

    https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=150174239&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

    4 Reading Strategies to Retire This Year (Plus 6 to Try Out !)

    **Required**

    Read “4 Reading Strategies to Retire This Year (Plus 6 to Try Out!),” by Gonser, located on the Edutopia website (2021).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/4-reading-strategies-retire-year-plus-6-try-out

    Reading Methods for Students with LD

    **Required**

    Read “Reading Methods for Students with LD” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/learning-disabilities/articles/reading-methods-students-ld

    A Powerful Approach to Reading Instruction

    **Required**

    Read “A Powerful Approach to Reading Instruction,” by Hamman, located on the Edutopia website (2018).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/powerful-approach-reading-instruction

    Strategies that Promote Comprehension

    **Required**

    Read “Strategies that Promote Comprehension” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/background-knowledge/articles/strategies-promote-comprehension

    Classroom Strategy Library

    **Required**

    Explore the “Classroom Strategy Library” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/classroom/classroom-strategies

    Reading and Writing Strategies

    **Required**

    Explore “Reading and Writing Strategies,” located on the AdLit website.

    https://www.adlit.org/in-the-classroom/strategies

    The New Literacies

    **Required**

    Read “The New Literacies” by Miners and Pascopella on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/t

    **## Week1assignment.docx**

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    There are various approaches to teaching reading and numerous instructional strategies that educators can use to engage students in reading and comprehending narrative and informational texts. It is critical for student success for teachers to understand reading standards and to plan effective, standards-based reading instruction that is supportive of all learners. Additionally, teachers must align their assessments to the standards and instruction to provide appropriate opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery.

    Utilize the “Planning Reading Instruction” template to complete the topic assignment.

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    Identify three approaches/methods (reading workshop, whole class reading of a core book, literature circles, sustained silent reading, etc.) to teaching reading and provide a 50-75 word description of each.

    **Part 2: Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    Write at least one measurable, developmentally appropriate learning objective for each of the provided reading standards.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    Create a whole group reading lesson based on one of the standards and learning objectives in Part 2. Design differentiated activities that support the standard and learning objective that students can engage in before reading a text, while reading the text, and after reading the text.

    Support the template with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric Criteria**

    expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    Approaches to reading instruction and descriptions are advanced and comprehensive.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    Approaches to reading instruction and descriptions are accurate and complete.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Learning Objectives**

    13 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Learning Objectives

    **5. Target**

    13 points

    Learning objectives are discerningly measurable and proficiently align with the standards.

    **4. Acceptable**

    11.31 points

    Learning objectives are clearly measurable and reasonably align with the standards.

    **3. Approaching**

    9.62 points

    Learning objectives lack clear measurability and/or vaguely align with the standards.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Lesson**

    13 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Whole Group Lesson

    **5. Target**

    13 points

    Explanation of how information will be presented to students is specific. Descriptions of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities that will be used to engage students in practicing and applying the learning objective are novel and purposeful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    11.31 points

    Explanation of how information will be presented to students is clear. Descriptions of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities that will be used to engage students in practicing and applying the learning objective are appropriate.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Differentiation**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Differentiation

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are meaningful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are suitable.

    **3. Approaching**

    7.22 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are artificial.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Assessment**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Assessment

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    The formative and summative assessments are sophisticated and skillfully align with the learning objective.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    The formative and summative assessments are solid and effectively align with the learning objective.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    **## PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20897625)_

    **Planning Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Approach** | **Description of Approach** |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Part 2:** **Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Literature** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions). | |
    | 8th Grade: Analyze how differences in the points of view of the characters and the audience or reader (e.g., created through the use of dramatic irony) create such effects as suspense or humor. | |
    | **Informational** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text. | |
    | 8th Grade: Determine an author's point of view, perspective and purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints. | |

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Grade Level** | |
    | **National/State Reading Standard**<br>_Identify one of the reading standards from Part 2 that will be the focus of the lesson. Standards must align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments._ | |
    | **Specific Learning Target(s)/Objective(s)**<br>_Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards._ | |
    | **Whole Group Lesson**<br>_Explain how information will be presented to students and describe activities you will use to engage students in practicing and applying the learning target/objective before reading, during reading, and after reading the core text._ | Pre-reading:<br>During Reading: <br>Post-reading: |
    | **Differentiation**<br>_Explain strategies to differentiate the whole group lesson to support each group of students._ | English Language Learners:<br>Students with Disabilities:<br>Students with Gifted Abilities:<br>Early Finishers: |
    | **Assessment**<br>_Explain one formative assessment that will be used to gauge student learning throughout the lesson that provides meaningful feedback. Additionally, provide a summative assessment to be used at the end of the lesson to allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery of the learning target/objective._ | Formative Assessment:<br>Summative Assessment: |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## RequriedReferenncesforweek1assignment.docx**

    **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

    **Required**

    Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
    _Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

    Classroom Reading Instruction That Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching

    **Required**

    Read “Classroom Reading Instruction That Supports Struggling Readers: Key Components for Effective Teaching,” by Denton, loca

    … Read More

    http://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/tieredinstruction/tier1/effectiveteaching

    The Sciences of Reading Instruction

    **Required**

    Read “The Sciences of Reading Instruction” by Gabriel from
    _Educational Leadership_ (2021).

    https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=150174239&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

    4 Reading Strategies to Retire This Year (Plus 6 to Try Out !)

    **Required**

    Read “4 Reading Strategies to Retire This Year (Plus 6 to Try Out!),” by Gonser, located on the Edutopia website (2021).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/4-reading-strategies-retire-year-plus-6-try-out

    Reading Methods for Students with LD

    **Required**

    Read “Reading Methods for Students with LD” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/learning-disabilities/articles/reading-methods-students-ld

    A Powerful Approach to Reading Instruction

    **Required**

    Read “A Powerful Approach to Reading Instruction,” by Hamman, located on the Edutopia website (2018).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/powerful-approach-reading-instruction

    Strategies that Promote Comprehension

    **Required**

    Read “Strategies that Promote Comprehension” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/background-knowledge/articles/strategies-promote-comprehension

    Classroom Strategy Library

    **Required**

    Explore the “Classroom Strategy Library” on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/classroom/classroom-strategies

    Reading and Writing Strategies

    **Required**

    Explore “Reading and Writing Strategies,” located on the AdLit website.

    https://www.adlit.org/in-the-classroom/strategies

    The New Literacies

    **Required**

    Read “The New Literacies” by Miners and Pascopella on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.org/t

    **## Week1assignment.docx**

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    There are various approaches to teaching reading and numerous instructional strategies that educators can use to engage students in reading and comprehending narrative and informational texts. It is critical for student success for teachers to understand reading standards and to plan effective, standards-based reading instruction that is supportive of all learners. Additionally, teachers must align their assessments to the standards and instruction to provide appropriate opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery.

    Utilize the “Planning Reading Instruction” template to complete the topic assignment.

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    Identify three approaches/methods (reading workshop, whole class reading of a core book, literature circles, sustained silent reading, etc.) to teaching reading and provide a 50-75 word description of each.

    **Part 2: Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    Write at least one measurable, developmentally appropriate learning objective for each of the provided reading standards.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    Create a whole group reading lesson based on one of the standards and learning objectives in Part 2. Design differentiated activities that support the standard and learning objective that students can engage in before reading a text, while reading the text, and after reading the text.

    Support the template with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric Criteria**

    expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    Approaches to reading instruction and descriptions are advanced and comprehensive.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    Approaches to reading instruction and descriptions are accurate and complete.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Learning Objectives**

    13 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Learning Objectives

    **5. Target**

    13 points

    Learning objectives are discerningly measurable and proficiently align with the standards.

    **4. Acceptable**

    11.31 points

    Learning objectives are clearly measurable and reasonably align with the standards.

    **3. Approaching**

    9.62 points

    Learning objectives lack clear measurability and/or vaguely align with the standards.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Lesson**

    13 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Whole Group Lesson

    **5. Target**

    13 points

    Explanation of how information will be presented to students is specific. Descriptions of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities that will be used to engage students in practicing and applying the learning objective are novel and purposeful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    11.31 points

    Explanation of how information will be presented to students is clear. Descriptions of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities that will be used to engage students in practicing and applying the learning objective are appropriate.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Differentiation**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Differentiation

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are meaningful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are suitable.

    **3. Approaching**

    7.22 points

    Strategies to differentiate the lesson for English language learners, students with disabilities, students with gifted abilities, and early finishers are artificial.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 3: Assessment**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 3: Assessment

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    The formative and summative assessments are sophisticated and skillfully align with the learning objective.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    The formative and summative assessments are solid and effectively align with the learning objective.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    **## PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20897625)_

    **Planning Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Approach** | **Description of Approach** |
    | | |
    | | |
    | | |

    **Part 2:** **Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Literature** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions). | |
    | 8th Grade: Analyze how differences in the points of view of the characters and the audience or reader (e.g., created through the use of dramatic irony) create such effects as suspense or humor. | |
    | **Informational** |
    | **Standard** | **Learning Objectives** |
    | 4th Grade: Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text. | |
    | 8th Grade: Determine an author's point of view, perspective and purpose in a text and analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints. | |

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Grade Level** | |
    | **National/State Reading Standard**<br>_Identify one of the reading standards from Part 2 that will be the focus of the lesson. Standards must align with the lesson’s learning targets/objectives and assessments._ | |
    | **Specific Learning Target(s)/Objective(s)**<br>_Learning objectives are designed to identify what the teacher intends to measure in learning. These must be aligned with the standards._ | |
    | **Whole Group Lesson**<br>_Explain how information will be presented to students and describe activities you will use to engage students in practicing and applying the learning target/objective before reading, during reading, and after reading the core text._ | Pre-reading:<br>During Reading: <br>Post-reading: |
    | **Differentiation**<br>_Explain strategies to differentiate the whole group lesson to support each group of students._ | English Language Learners:<br>Students with Disabilities:<br>Students with Gifted Abilities:<br>Early Finishers: |
    | **Assessment**<br>_Explain one formative assessment that will be used to gauge student learning throughout the lesson that provides meaningful feedback. Additionally, provide a summative assessment to be used at the end of the lesson to allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and mastery of the learning target/objective._ | Formative Assessment:<br>Summative Assessment: |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

  • [Solved] OSH 4308 III

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please view attachments – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## OSH4308UnitIII.docx – ## UnitIIIConsultingReporttemplate.docx **## OSH4308UnitIII.docx** As the environmental health and safety (EHS) manager, you have been asked to evaluate an existing operation to determine employee’s current exposure to he…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please view attachments

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## OSH4308UnitIII.docx

    – ## UnitIIIConsultingReporttemplate.docx

    **## OSH4308UnitIII.docx**

    As the environmental health and safety (EHS) manager, you have been asked to evaluate an existing operation to determine employee’s current exposure to hexane, which is a chemical used in painting processes.

    You are to complete an evaluation of the employee’s current exposure by determining the employee’s exposure to hexane (toxic contaminant) by calculating time-weighted average (TWA) and compare it to the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and modify the PEL, if necessary. If it is necessary to modify the PEL, explain the reasoning why it is to be modified. Once the current exposure has been determined, select the appropriate ventilation system between dilution and local exhaust that is the best choice to control the concentration of the contamination. Ensure that you provide the reasons why you think your selection of ventilation system is the best choice. You are to provide the results in a three-page project report using the Unit III Consulting Report template.

    Scenario

    An employee working in a room measuring 15 ft x 20 ft x 15 ft sprays paint assembly parts using a paint containing hexane. The PEL for hexane is 500 ppm. The employee wears a half-face, air-purifying respirator, but management would like to install engineering control measures to reduce or eliminate the employee’s exposure to hexane. The options are to:

    (1) install a dilution ventilation system, or

    (2) install a local exhaust ventilation system.

    The employee works a 9-hour shift and has the following exposures:

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/osh-4308-iii)

    For the general dilution ventilation system to work, there must be at least 20 room air changes per hour. The fan which supplies air to this area produces 1,500 cubic feet per minute (cfm) (Q).

    In order for the local exhaust ventilation system to remove the contaminant to acceptable concentrations, the capture velocity must be at least 140 feet per minute (fpm). The proposed local exhaust system ventilation system uses a 1.0 feet diameter duct and a fan that provides a total volume of 1,275 cubic feet per minute (cfm). The source of the contamination is located 1.5 feet from the opening of the duct. Determine the appropriate ventilation control and calculate the capture velocity.

    Complete your project by following the Unit III Consulting Report template linked above. Ensure you show your equations and all work for determining answers for all three scenarios in the project document. You may either formulate the scenario equations using the Word equation formula toolbar or write out and solve your equations with answers on a separate paper. Then, take a screenshot of your work for each scenario using your phone or similar device and insert it as an image in the document. Make sure your image is clear and legible to read.

    No references are required for this assignment; however, if outside sources are used, please adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

    ## image1.png

    **## UnitIIIConsultingReporttemplate.docx**

    1

    **Unit III Project**

    Student Name

    Columbia Southern University

    Course Name

    Instructor Name

    Date

    2

    **Executive Summary**

    On this page, you should summarize the purpose of the calculations or testing (short, concise, and to the point), the major findings (do not discuss the methodology or specifics). The purpose of the executive summary is to give the decision-makers the down and dirty on their problems, options to mitigate or eliminate the issue, and if possible, the estimated costs involved. Do not exceed the purpose of the project. This is especially important if you are being paid as a consultant. Only give the client what they are paying for. This is not from greed, but from a strictly legal standpoint. To do consulting work, you must be covered by insurance, etc., so do not go astray of the contract.

    3

    **Background (Example Verbiage Only – Tailor this to fit your specific requirement, such as performing calculations for the Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Manager)**

    On March 24, 2018, Be Safe Consulting, Inc. entered a contract to perform the following services:

    a) Conduct sampling and analysis for…

    b) Provide ventilation measurements on booth exhaust air flow

    c) Determine the room air changes in…

    Make sure you fully describe what you were instructed or contracted to do and any limitations on that contract, if any.

    **Do not write the report in first person. (No use of words such as I, we, our, etc.)**

    **Methodology**

    Describe in detail, which method, (e.g., equations). was used to determine your results.

    **Findings**

    Briefly discuss the findings. Insert a table to show air sampling results, with the PEL beside the calculated TWA. (Do not just insert the 8-hour OSHA PEL if employees are working 10-hour shifts. Always calculate the modified PEL in this case.

    An example findings section from a report that was prepared for a client as an example:

    The results of the samples are as follows:

    **Note:** Multiple results are best presented in table format and single results presented using
    **Bold Font**

    :

    **Calculation Results**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Contaminant** | **Concentration (Time-Weighted Average)** | **PEL** |
    | | | |

    ****Results of Option #1 Ventilation System** **Results of Option #2 Ventilation System** **Summary and Conclusions** Summarize all your findings and recommendations in this section. SAMPLING ANALYSIS 5 **References (If Any)** Format all citations and references in proper APA Style. **Appendix A – Calculations for Time-Weighted Average** **Appendix B– Calculations for Permissible Exposure Limit (Modification)** **Appendix C – Calculations for Option #1 Ventilation System** **Appendix D – Calculations for Option #2 Ventilation System****

    **## UnitIIIConsultingReporttemplate.docx**

    1

    **Unit III Project**

    Student Name

    Columbia Southern University

    Course Name

    Instructor Name

    Date

    2

    **Executive Summary**

    On this page, you should summarize the purpose of the calculations or testing (short, concise, and to the point), the major findings (do not discuss the methodology or specifics). The purpose of the executive summary is to give the decision-makers the down and dirty on their problems, options to mitigate or eliminate the issue, and if possible, the estimated costs involved. Do not exceed the purpose of the project. This is especially important if you are being paid as a consultant. Only give the client what they are paying for. This is not from greed, but from a strictly legal standpoint. To do consulting work, you must be covered by insurance, etc., so do not go astray of the contract.

    3

    **Background (Example Verbiage Only – Tailor this to fit your specific requirement, such as performing calculations for the Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Manager)**

    On March 24, 2018, Be Safe Consulting, Inc. entered a contract to perform the following services:

    a) Conduct sampling and analysis for…

    b) Provide ventilation measurements on booth exhaust air flow

    c) Determine the room air changes in…

    Make sure you fully describe what you were instructed or contracted to do and any limitations on that contract, if any.

    **Do not write the report in first person. (No use of words such as I, we, our, etc.)**

    **Methodology**

    Describe in detail, which method, (e.g., equations). was used to determine your results.

    **Findings**

    Briefly discuss the findings. Insert a table to show air sampling results, with the PEL beside the calculated TWA. (Do not just insert the 8-hour OSHA PEL if employees are working 10-hour shifts. Always calculate the modified PEL in this case.

    An example findings section from a report that was prepared for a client as an example:

    The results of the samples are as follows:

    **Note:** Multiple results are best presented in table format and single results presented using
    **Bold Font**

    :

    **Calculation Results**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Contaminant** | **Concentration (Time-Weighted Average)** | **PEL** |
    | | | |

    ****Results of Option #1 Ventilation System** **Results of Option #2 Ventilation System** **Summary and Conclusions** Summarize all your findings and recommendations in this section. SAMPLING ANALYSIS 5 **References (If Any)** Format all citations and references in proper APA Style. **Appendix A – Calculations for Time-Weighted Average** **Appendix B– Calculations for Permissible Exposure Limit (Modification)** **Appendix C – Calculations for Option #1 Ventilation System** **Appendix D – Calculations for Option #2 Ventilation System****

    **## OSH4308UnitIII.docx**

    As the environmental health and safety (EHS) manager, you have been asked to evaluate an existing operation to determine employee’s current exposure to hexane, which is a chemical used in painting processes.

    You are to complete an evaluation of the employee’s current exposure by determining the employee’s exposure to hexane (toxic contaminant) by calculating time-weighted average (TWA) and compare it to the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and modify the PEL, if necessary. If it is necessary to modify the PEL, explain the reasoning why it is to be modified. Once the current exposure has been determined, select the appropriate ventilation system between dilution and local exhaust that is the best choice to control the concentration of the contamination. Ensure that you provide the reasons why you think your selection of ventilation system is the best choice. You are to provide the results in a three-page project report using the Unit III Consulting Report template.

    Scenario

    An employee working in a room measuring 15 ft x 20 ft x 15 ft sprays paint assembly parts using a paint containing hexane. The PEL for hexane is 500 ppm. The employee wears a half-face, air-purifying respirator, but management would like to install engineering control measures to reduce or eliminate the employee’s exposure to hexane. The options are to:

    (1) install a dilution ventilation system, or

    (2) install a local exhaust ventilation system.

    The employee works a 9-hour shift and has the following exposures:

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/osh-4308-iii)

    For the general dilution ventilation system to work, there must be at least 20 room air changes per hour. The fan which supplies air to this area produces 1,500 cubic feet per minute (cfm) (Q).

    In order for the local exhaust ventilation system to remove the contaminant to acceptable concentrations, the capture velocity must be at least 140 feet per minute (fpm). The proposed local exhaust system ventilation system uses a 1.0 feet diameter duct and a fan that provides a total volume of 1,275 cubic feet per minute (cfm). The source of the contamination is located 1.5 feet from the opening of the duct. Determine the appropriate ventilation control and calculate the capture velocity.

    Complete your project by following the Unit III Consulting Report template linked above. Ensure you show your equations and all work for determining answers for all three scenarios in the project document. You may either formulate the scenario equations using the Word equation formula toolbar or write out and solve your equations with answers on a separate paper. Then, take a screenshot of your work for each scenario using your phone or similar device and insert it as an image in the document. Make sure your image is clear and legible to read.

    No references are required for this assignment; however, if outside sources are used, please adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

    ## image1.png

    **## UnitIIIConsultingReporttemplate.docx**

    1

    **Unit III Project**

    Student Name

    Columbia Southern University

    Course Name

    Instructor Name

    Date

    2

    **Executive Summary**

    On this page, you should summarize the purpose of the calculations or testing (short, concise, and to the point), the major findings (do not discuss the methodology or specifics). The purpose of the executive summary is to give the decision-makers the down and dirty on their problems, options to mitigate or eliminate the issue, and if possible, the estimated costs involved. Do not exceed the purpose of the project. This is especially important if you are being paid as a consultant. Only give the client what they are paying for. This is not from greed, but from a strictly legal standpoint. To do consulting work, you must be covered by insurance, etc., so do not go astray of the contract.

    3

    **Background (Example Verbiage Only – Tailor this to fit your specific requirement, such as performing calculations for the Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Manager)**

    On March 24, 2018, Be Safe Consulting, Inc. entered a contract to perform the following services:

    a) Conduct sampling and analysis for…

    b) Provide ventilation measurements on booth exhaust air flow

    c) Determine the room air changes in…

    Make sure you fully describe what you were instructed or contracted to do and any limitations on that contract, if any.

    **Do not write the report in first person. (No use of words such as I, we, our, etc.)**

    **Methodology**

    Describe in detail, which method, (e.g., equations). was used to determine your results.

    **Findings**

    Briefly discuss the findings. Insert a table to show air sampling results, with the PEL beside the calculated TWA. (Do not just insert the 8-hour OSHA PEL if employees are working 10-hour shifts. Always calculate the modified PEL in this case.

    An example findings section from a report that was prepared for a client as an example:

    The results of the samples are as follows:

    **Note:** Multiple results are best presented in table format and single results presented using
    **Bold Font**

    :

    **Calculation Results**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Contaminant** | **Concentration (Time-Weighted Average)** | **PEL** |
    | | | |

    ****Results of Option #1 Ventilation System** **Results of Option #2 Ventilation System** **Summary and Conclusions** Summarize all your findings and recommendations in this section. SAMPLING ANALYSIS 5 **References (If Any)** Format all citations and references in proper APA Style. **Appendix A – Calculations for Time-Weighted Average** **Appendix B– Calculations for Permissible Exposure Limit (Modification)** **Appendix C – Calculations for Option #1 Ventilation System** **Appendix D – Calculations for Option #2 Ventilation System****

    **## OSH4308UnitIII.docx**

    As the environmental health and safety (EHS) manager, you have been asked to evaluate an existing operation to determine employee’s current exposure to hexane, which is a chemical used in painting processes.

    You are to complete an evaluation of the employee’s current exposure by determining the employee’s exposure to hexane (toxic contaminant) by calculating time-weighted average (TWA) and compare it to the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and modify the PEL, if necessary. If it is necessary to modify the PEL, explain the reasoning why it is to be modified. Once the current exposure has been determined, select the appropriate ventilation system between dilution and local exhaust that is the best choice to control the concentration of the contamination. Ensure that you provide the reasons why you think your selection of ventilation system is the best choice. You are to provide the results in a three-page project report using the Unit III Consulting Report template.

    Scenario

    An employee working in a room measuring 15 ft x 20 ft x 15 ft sprays paint assembly parts using a paint containing hexane. The PEL for hexane is 500 ppm. The employee wears a half-face, air-purifying respirator, but management would like to install engineering control measures to reduce or eliminate the employee’s exposure to hexane. The options are to:

    (1) install a dilution ventilation system, or

    (2) install a local exhaust ventilation system.

    The employee works a 9-hour shift and has the following exposures:

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/osh-4308-iii)

    For the general dilution ventilation system to work, there must be at least 20 room air changes per hour. The fan which supplies air to this area produces 1,500 cubic feet per minute (cfm) (Q).

    In order for the local exhaust ventilation system to remove the contaminant to acceptable concentrations, the capture velocity must be at least 140 feet per minute (fpm). The proposed local exhaust system ventilation system uses a 1.0 feet diameter duct and a fan that provides a total volume of 1,275 cubic feet per minute (cfm). The source of the contamination is located 1.5 feet from the opening of the duct. Determine the appropriate ventilation control and calculate the capture velocity.

    Complete your project by following the Unit III Consulting Report template linked above. Ensure you show your equations and all work for determining answers for all three scenarios in the project document. You may either formulate the scenario equations using the Word equation formula toolbar or write out and solve your equations with answers on a separate paper. Then, take a screenshot of your work for each scenario using your phone or similar device and insert it as an image in the document. Make sure your image is clear and legible to read.

    No references are required for this assignment; however, if outside sources are used, please adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

    ## image1.png

    **## UnitIIIConsultingReporttemplate.docx**

    1

    **Unit III Project**

    Student Name

    Columbia Southern University

    Course Name

    Instructor Name

    Date

    2

    **Executive Summary**

    On this page, you should summarize the purpose of the calculations or testing (short, concise, and to the point), the major findings (do not discuss the methodology or specifics). The purpose of the executive summary is to give the decision-makers the down and dirty on their problems, options to mitigate or eliminate the issue, and if possible, the estimated costs involved. Do not exceed the purpose of the project. This is especially important if you are being paid as a consultant. Only give the client what they are paying for. This is not from greed, but from a strictly legal standpoint. To do consulting work, you must be covered by insurance, etc., so do not go astray of the contract.

    3

    **Background (Example Verbiage Only – Tailor this to fit your specific requirement, such as performing calculations for the Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Manager)**

    On March 24, 2018, Be Safe Consulting, Inc. entered a contract to perform the following services:

    a) Conduct sampling and analysis for…

    b) Provide ventilation measurements on booth exhaust air flow

    c) Determine the room air changes in…

    Make sure you fully describe what you were instructed or contracted to do and any limitations on that contract, if any.

    **Do not write the report in first person. (No use of words such as I, we, our, etc.)**

    **Methodology**

    Describe in detail, which method, (e.g., equations). was used to determine your results.

    **Findings**

    Briefly discuss the findings. Insert a table to show air sampling results, with the PEL beside the calculated TWA. (Do not just insert the 8-hour OSHA PEL if employees are working 10-hour shifts. Always calculate the modified PEL in this case.

    An example findings section from a report that was prepared for a client as an example:

    The results of the samples are as follows:

    **Note:** Multiple results are best presented in table format and single results presented using
    **Bold Font**

    :

    **Calculation Results**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Contaminant** | **Concentration (Time-Weighted Average)** | **PEL** |
    | | | |

    ****Results of Option #1 Ventilation System** **Results of Option #2 Ventilation System** **Summary and Conclusions** Summarize all your findings and recommendations in this section. SAMPLING ANALYSIS 5 **References (If Any)** Format all citations and references in proper APA Style. **Appendix A – Calculations for Time-Weighted Average** **Appendix B– Calculations for Permissible Exposure Limit (Modification)** **Appendix C – Calculations for Option #1 Ventilation System** **Appendix D – Calculations for Option #2 Ventilation System****

  • [Solved] K12 CASE STUDY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## FieldExperiencePlacementChart_Week12.docx – ## K-12StudentCaseStudy.pdf **## FieldExperiencePlacementChart_Week12.docx** ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/k12-case-study) ## K-12 Student Case Study ### Field Experience Placement Chart **Week 1** | | | | — …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## FieldExperiencePlacementChart_Week12.docx

    – ## K-12StudentCaseStudy.pdf

    **## FieldExperiencePlacementChart_Week12.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/k12-case-study)

    ## K-12 Student Case Study

    ### Field Experience Placement Chart

    **Week 1**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Component | Descriptive Details |
    | **Student** | |
    | **Background data (pre-test)** | |
    | **Plan & Intervention Strategies** | |

    Page 1 of 1

    Page 2 of 2

    ## image1.png

    **## K-12StudentCaseStudy.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    K-12 Student Case Study

    General Directions

    Please identify a K-12 student (from a racial and ethnic group different from your own) to work
    with closely during your 10-hour field experience. Write a 6 to 8-page paper describing your
    work with the student. Please use the following format (and label each section in your paper):

    1. Analysis and Synthesis

    Collect information/data about the student. This information should come from multiple
    sources, such as school records, assessments, observations, interviews, referrals,
    pretests, etc. Summarize and organize the data in such a manner as to reveal the
    student’s strengths, weaknesses, etc.

    2. Diagnosis

    Describe consistencies and patterns leading to a summary of the problem(s) or
    situation(s), possible causes, and other significant and relevant characteristics of the
    student. Special attention should be given to the relevance of the student’s diverse
    backgrounds in the current educational setting. Link section to research.

    3. Interventions

    Describe in detail your interventions/strategies in working with the student. What exactly
    did you do? The justification of the plan should be guided by research.

    4. Evaluation

    Results? Were you successful? Describe evidence from your pre and post-test. Include
    a decision for termination or referral. Note: Please include an electronic copy of your pre
    and post-test questions with your emailed paper; include copies of the pre and post-test
    completed by the student with the hard copy of your final paper.

    5. Reflection

    Describe your experience working with an individual from a racial and ethnic group
    different from your own. What were your challenges? What were your successes?

    Suggested 8-Week Timeline:

    Week 1- Identify the student; obtain parent permission (if needed); collect background data
    (including a pretest); diagnose the problem; plan your interventions/strategies; Submit field
    experience placement chart to university professor.

    Weeks 2 through 6- Implement your interventions/strategies; maintain case notes or anecdotal
    records describing your meetings with the student, progress, concerns, etc.

    Week 4 Email a mid-term report to your university supervisor (briefly describe whom you are
    working with, the student’s issue/concern, what you have done so far, what your plans are over
    the next few weeks, etc.).

    Week 7 – Collect post-test data; write your paper; Submit your paper to Blackboard link. If your
    Case Study is not acceptable, you will receive a course grade of IP (In-Progress). Your
    university instructor will provide feedback and, if necessary, remediation.

    Page 2 of 2

    Scoring Guidelines

    Available points: 100

    Component Target Proficient Unacceptable

    Analysis &
    Synthesis

    Includes data from 4 or
    more sources (sources

    are explicitly stated in the
    case study); and correlate

    to student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from one to
    two sources (sources are

    not stated in the case
    study); minimal detail of
    the student’s strengths,

    weaknesses, etc.

    Diagnosis Describes consistencies
    or patterns leading to a
    summary of the problem
    or situation; describes

    possible causes; includes
    other significant

    characteristics of the
    student as it relates to

    his/her diverse
    background; and is

    supported and cited by
    relevant research.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Intervention Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies
    and techniques used;

    strong plan; and is
    supported and cited by

    relevant research.

    Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies and
    techniques used; strong

    plan

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Evaluation Detailed summary of
    results; includes strong

    pre and posttest
    evidence; includes

    decision for termination or
    documentation of

    recommendation for
    further intervention with

    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, pre and posttest

    evidence, and decision for
    termination or

    documentation of
    recommendation for

    further intervention with
    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, no specific

    evidence is provided. No
    decision about future plans

    for student.

    Reflection & Format Thoughtful description of
    the experience, the
    challenges and the

    successes.
    Paper is well written;

    each section is labeled;
    free from grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Full description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is well written; each
    section is labeled; has
    minimal grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Minimal description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is poorly written; no
    labels used; has many

    grammar and/or spelling
    errors; less than 6 pages

    in length

    – K-12 Student Case Study
    – General Directions
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## K-12StudentCaseStudy.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    K-12 Student Case Study

    General Directions

    Please identify a K-12 student (from a racial and ethnic group different from your own) to work
    with closely during your 10-hour field experience. Write a 6 to 8-page paper describing your
    work with the student. Please use the following format (and label each section in your paper):

    1. Analysis and Synthesis

    Collect information/data about the student. This information should come from multiple
    sources, such as school records, assessments, observations, interviews, referrals,
    pretests, etc. Summarize and organize the data in such a manner as to reveal the
    student’s strengths, weaknesses, etc.

    2. Diagnosis

    Describe consistencies and patterns leading to a summary of the problem(s) or
    situation(s), possible causes, and other significant and relevant characteristics of the
    student. Special attention should be given to the relevance of the student’s diverse
    backgrounds in the current educational setting. Link section to research.

    3. Interventions

    Describe in detail your interventions/strategies in working with the student. What exactly
    did you do? The justification of the plan should be guided by research.

    4. Evaluation

    Results? Were you successful? Describe evidence from your pre and post-test. Include
    a decision for termination or referral. Note: Please include an electronic copy of your pre
    and post-test questions with your emailed paper; include copies of the pre and post-test
    completed by the student with the hard copy of your final paper.

    5. Reflection

    Describe your experience working with an individual from a racial and ethnic group
    different from your own. What were your challenges? What were your successes?

    Suggested 8-Week Timeline:

    Week 1- Identify the student; obtain parent permission (if needed); collect background data
    (including a pretest); diagnose the problem; plan your interventions/strategies; Submit field
    experience placement chart to university professor.

    Weeks 2 through 6- Implement your interventions/strategies; maintain case notes or anecdotal
    records describing your meetings with the student, progress, concerns, etc.

    Week 4 Email a mid-term report to your university supervisor (briefly describe whom you are
    working with, the student’s issue/concern, what you have done so far, what your plans are over
    the next few weeks, etc.).

    Week 7 – Collect post-test data; write your paper; Submit your paper to Blackboard link. If your
    Case Study is not acceptable, you will receive a course grade of IP (In-Progress). Your
    university instructor will provide feedback and, if necessary, remediation.

    Page 2 of 2

    Scoring Guidelines

    Available points: 100

    Component Target Proficient Unacceptable

    Analysis &
    Synthesis

    Includes data from 4 or
    more sources (sources

    are explicitly stated in the
    case study); and correlate

    to student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from one to
    two sources (sources are

    not stated in the case
    study); minimal detail of
    the student’s strengths,

    weaknesses, etc.

    Diagnosis Describes consistencies
    or patterns leading to a
    summary of the problem
    or situation; describes

    possible causes; includes
    other significant

    characteristics of the
    student as it relates to

    his/her diverse
    background; and is

    supported and cited by
    relevant research.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Intervention Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies
    and techniques used;

    strong plan; and is
    supported and cited by

    relevant research.

    Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies and
    techniques used; strong

    plan

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Evaluation Detailed summary of
    results; includes strong

    pre and posttest
    evidence; includes

    decision for termination or
    documentation of

    recommendation for
    further intervention with

    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, pre and posttest

    evidence, and decision for
    termination or

    documentation of
    recommendation for

    further intervention with
    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, no specific

    evidence is provided. No
    decision about future plans

    for student.

    Reflection & Format Thoughtful description of
    the experience, the
    challenges and the

    successes.
    Paper is well written;

    each section is labeled;
    free from grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Full description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is well written; each
    section is labeled; has
    minimal grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Minimal description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is poorly written; no
    labels used; has many

    grammar and/or spelling
    errors; less than 6 pages

    in length

    – K-12 Student Case Study
    – General Directions
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## FieldExperiencePlacementChart_Week12.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/k12-case-study)

    ## K-12 Student Case Study

    ### Field Experience Placement Chart

    **Week 1**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Component | Descriptive Details |
    | **Student** | |
    | **Background data (pre-test)** | |
    | **Plan & Intervention Strategies** | |

    Page 1 of 1

    Page 2 of 2

    ## image1.png

    **## K-12StudentCaseStudy.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    K-12 Student Case Study

    General Directions

    Please identify a K-12 student (from a racial and ethnic group different from your own) to work
    with closely during your 10-hour field experience. Write a 6 to 8-page paper describing your
    work with the student. Please use the following format (and label each section in your paper):

    1. Analysis and Synthesis

    Collect information/data about the student. This information should come from multiple
    sources, such as school records, assessments, observations, interviews, referrals,
    pretests, etc. Summarize and organize the data in such a manner as to reveal the
    student’s strengths, weaknesses, etc.

    2. Diagnosis

    Describe consistencies and patterns leading to a summary of the problem(s) or
    situation(s), possible causes, and other significant and relevant characteristics of the
    student. Special attention should be given to the relevance of the student’s diverse
    backgrounds in the current educational setting. Link section to research.

    3. Interventions

    Describe in detail your interventions/strategies in working with the student. What exactly
    did you do? The justification of the plan should be guided by research.

    4. Evaluation

    Results? Were you successful? Describe evidence from your pre and post-test. Include
    a decision for termination or referral. Note: Please include an electronic copy of your pre
    and post-test questions with your emailed paper; include copies of the pre and post-test
    completed by the student with the hard copy of your final paper.

    5. Reflection

    Describe your experience working with an individual from a racial and ethnic group
    different from your own. What were your challenges? What were your successes?

    Suggested 8-Week Timeline:

    Week 1- Identify the student; obtain parent permission (if needed); collect background data
    (including a pretest); diagnose the problem; plan your interventions/strategies; Submit field
    experience placement chart to university professor.

    Weeks 2 through 6- Implement your interventions/strategies; maintain case notes or anecdotal
    records describing your meetings with the student, progress, concerns, etc.

    Week 4 Email a mid-term report to your university supervisor (briefly describe whom you are
    working with, the student’s issue/concern, what you have done so far, what your plans are over
    the next few weeks, etc.).

    Week 7 – Collect post-test data; write your paper; Submit your paper to Blackboard link. If your
    Case Study is not acceptable, you will receive a course grade of IP (In-Progress). Your
    university instructor will provide feedback and, if necessary, remediation.

    Page 2 of 2

    Scoring Guidelines

    Available points: 100

    Component Target Proficient Unacceptable

    Analysis &
    Synthesis

    Includes data from 4 or
    more sources (sources

    are explicitly stated in the
    case study); and correlate

    to student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from one to
    two sources (sources are

    not stated in the case
    study); minimal detail of
    the student’s strengths,

    weaknesses, etc.

    Diagnosis Describes consistencies
    or patterns leading to a
    summary of the problem
    or situation; describes

    possible causes; includes
    other significant

    characteristics of the
    student as it relates to

    his/her diverse
    background; and is

    supported and cited by
    relevant research.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Intervention Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies
    and techniques used;

    strong plan; and is
    supported and cited by

    relevant research.

    Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies and
    techniques used; strong

    plan

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Evaluation Detailed summary of
    results; includes strong

    pre and posttest
    evidence; includes

    decision for termination or
    documentation of

    recommendation for
    further intervention with

    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, pre and posttest

    evidence, and decision for
    termination or

    documentation of
    recommendation for

    further intervention with
    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, no specific

    evidence is provided. No
    decision about future plans

    for student.

    Reflection & Format Thoughtful description of
    the experience, the
    challenges and the

    successes.
    Paper is well written;

    each section is labeled;
    free from grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Full description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is well written; each
    section is labeled; has
    minimal grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Minimal description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is poorly written; no
    labels used; has many

    grammar and/or spelling
    errors; less than 6 pages

    in length

    – K-12 Student Case Study
    – General Directions
    – Scoring Guidelines

    **## FieldExperiencePlacementChart_Week12.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/k12-case-study)

    ## K-12 Student Case Study

    ### Field Experience Placement Chart

    **Week 1**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Component | Descriptive Details |
    | **Student** | |
    | **Background data (pre-test)** | |
    | **Plan & Intervention Strategies** | |

    Page 1 of 1

    Page 2 of 2

    ## image1.png

    **## K-12StudentCaseStudy.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    K-12 Student Case Study

    General Directions

    Please identify a K-12 student (from a racial and ethnic group different from your own) to work
    with closely during your 10-hour field experience. Write a 6 to 8-page paper describing your
    work with the student. Please use the following format (and label each section in your paper):

    1. Analysis and Synthesis

    Collect information/data about the student. This information should come from multiple
    sources, such as school records, assessments, observations, interviews, referrals,
    pretests, etc. Summarize and organize the data in such a manner as to reveal the
    student’s strengths, weaknesses, etc.

    2. Diagnosis

    Describe consistencies and patterns leading to a summary of the problem(s) or
    situation(s), possible causes, and other significant and relevant characteristics of the
    student. Special attention should be given to the relevance of the student’s diverse
    backgrounds in the current educational setting. Link section to research.

    3. Interventions

    Describe in detail your interventions/strategies in working with the student. What exactly
    did you do? The justification of the plan should be guided by research.

    4. Evaluation

    Results? Were you successful? Describe evidence from your pre and post-test. Include
    a decision for termination or referral. Note: Please include an electronic copy of your pre
    and post-test questions with your emailed paper; include copies of the pre and post-test
    completed by the student with the hard copy of your final paper.

    5. Reflection

    Describe your experience working with an individual from a racial and ethnic group
    different from your own. What were your challenges? What were your successes?

    Suggested 8-Week Timeline:

    Week 1- Identify the student; obtain parent permission (if needed); collect background data
    (including a pretest); diagnose the problem; plan your interventions/strategies; Submit field
    experience placement chart to university professor.

    Weeks 2 through 6- Implement your interventions/strategies; maintain case notes or anecdotal
    records describing your meetings with the student, progress, concerns, etc.

    Week 4 Email a mid-term report to your university supervisor (briefly describe whom you are
    working with, the student’s issue/concern, what you have done so far, what your plans are over
    the next few weeks, etc.).

    Week 7 – Collect post-test data; write your paper; Submit your paper to Blackboard link. If your
    Case Study is not acceptable, you will receive a course grade of IP (In-Progress). Your
    university instructor will provide feedback and, if necessary, remediation.

    Page 2 of 2

    Scoring Guidelines

    Available points: 100

    Component Target Proficient Unacceptable

    Analysis &
    Synthesis

    Includes data from 4 or
    more sources (sources

    are explicitly stated in the
    case study); and correlate

    to student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Includes data from one to
    two sources (sources are

    not stated in the case
    study); minimal detail of
    the student’s strengths,

    weaknesses, etc.

    Diagnosis Describes consistencies
    or patterns leading to a
    summary of the problem
    or situation; describes

    possible causes; includes
    other significant

    characteristics of the
    student as it relates to

    his/her diverse
    background; and is

    supported and cited by
    relevant research.

    Includes data from 3
    sources (sources are

    explicitly stated in the case
    study); suggest the
    student’s strengths,
    weaknesses, etc.

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Intervention Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies
    and techniques used;

    strong plan; and is
    supported and cited by

    relevant research.

    Includes multiple
    sessions; detailed

    summary of strategies and
    techniques used; strong

    plan

    Does not identify
    consistencies or patterns
    leading to the problem or

    situation; does not
    describe possible causes;

    no other significant
    characteristics of the

    student included

    Evaluation Detailed summary of
    results; includes strong

    pre and posttest
    evidence; includes

    decision for termination or
    documentation of

    recommendation for
    further intervention with

    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, pre and posttest

    evidence, and decision for
    termination or

    documentation of
    recommendation for

    further intervention with
    hosting professional.

    Includes summary of
    results, no specific

    evidence is provided. No
    decision about future plans

    for student.

    Reflection & Format Thoughtful description of
    the experience, the
    challenges and the

    successes.
    Paper is well written;

    each section is labeled;
    free from grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Full description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is well written; each
    section is labeled; has
    minimal grammar or

    spelling errors; 6-8 pages
    in length

    Minimal description of the
    experience, the

    challenges, and the
    successes.

    Paper is poorly written; no
    labels used; has many

    grammar and/or spelling
    errors; less than 6 pages

    in length

    – K-12 Student Case Study
    – General Directions
    – Scoring Guidelines

  • [Solved] Vision for Learning Article Critique 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf** Page 1 of 2 Article Critique General Directions Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it carefully and reflect on it, then fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

  • [Solved] Vision for Learning Article Critique 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf** Page 1 of 2 Article Critique General Directions Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it carefully and reflect on it, then fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric

    **## ArticleCritiqueGuidelinesRubric3.pdf**

    Page 1 of 2

    Article Critique

    General Directions

    Using all library databases available, locate a journal article related to school leadership. Read it
    carefully and reflect on it, then follow the attached guidelines and rubric to help craft your
    critique. Articles should not be older than two years old.

    Reading and Thinking:

    • Read the article SLOWLY. Don't criticize anything just yet. Try to really understand the
    author's logic rather than questioning it.

    • Mark key points and transitions as you read. Try to isolate at least one central point in
    each paragraph.

    • Review introductory and closing sections closely. Think about how the author moves
    from opening statements to conclusions via the body of the article.

    Writing:

    • Begin your written analysis with a blanket statement summarizing what the author does
    in the article. Sometimes the author explicitly gives you his or her agenda in the
    introduction and/or in the conclusion. You should be able to relay this in one or (maybe)
    two sentences.

    • Summarize the key ideas used by the author in achieving his or her agenda. Look at the
    parts of the article you have marked. Try to indicate how the author progresses from
    idea to idea in the article.

    • List important evidence used to support key ideas in the article. Indicate why the author
    finds this evidence convincing.

    Critiquing:

    • Carefully describe any biased, illogical, or inappropriate use of evidence in the
    article. Take into account the author's purpose and perspective, as any apparent misuse
    of evidence may be attributable to these factors.

    • Note any avoidable lack of evidence in the article.

    • Note the strong points of the article.

    Finalizing:

    • Proofread your writing. Read it aloud. Try to use active verbs and concise modifiers.

    • Verify that your analysis would be helpful to someone who hadn't read the article. Don't
    assume that your reader can intuit what you mean by anything.

    Grading Rubric

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    At the top of the page,
    write your article

    Reference has more
    than 1 APA error.

    (0 points)

    Reference follows APA
    format, with 1 error.

    (1 point)

    Reference carefully
    follows APA format,

    Page 2 of 2

    Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

    reference in APA
    format.

    with no errors.
    (2 points)

    Summary
    Key points and

    evidence to support
    those points is clearly

    presented

    Summary of article is
    inadequate or too

    brief; does not identify
    main points; fails to
    include appropriate
    evidence to support

    points. (0 points)

    Acceptable summary
    of information that

    describes the article’s
    premise; evidence is
    included. (2 points)

    Excellent summary of
    relevant information
    that clearly describe
    the article’s premise;
    evidence is included.

    (4 points)

    Critique Incomplete critique;
    lacks reflection and

    sound analysis of the
    chosen article; no

    clear connections are
    made to evidence

    gather from the article.
    (0 points)

    Complete critique;
    shows an adequate

    level of reflection and
    analysis; may lack

    connections to
    evidence gathered

    from the article.
    (2 points)

    Complete, well-formed
    critique; shows a

    thoughtful, reflective,
    in-depth analysis of

    chosen article.
    (4 points)

    Professional
    Presentation

    Writing involves many
    grammatical errors

    (more than 3).
    (0 points)

    Writing involves few
    grammatical errors (no
    more than 2). (1 point)

    Writing is free of all
    writing errors.

    (2 points)

    – Article Critique
    – General Directions
    – Grading Rubric