Category: Clinical Nursing & Patient Care

  • [Solved] Nursing Signature Assignment- Case Study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached for instructions – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx **## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx** SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT Submission Type: A written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length. Details below. Details: CASE Study: The purpose of this assignment is to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached for instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx

    **## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx**

    SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT

    Submission Type:

    A written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length. Details below.

    Details:

    CASE Study: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the value of health information technology in the prevention and detection of errors, as well as analysis of unintended consequences and human factors through quality improvement strategies.

    1. Review the following video and documents on the case study. *

    _RaDonda Vaught speaks out_ l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQELinks to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQE). (4:56).

    Lusk, C. (2022). Reconsidering the application of systems thinking in healthcare: the RaDonda Vaught case. Available at
    [https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltextLinks to an external site.](https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltext)

    State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at
    [https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf) Note pages 5-6, 50-51.

    1. Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.

    A. Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.

    B. Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.

    I. Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.

    C. Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.

    D. List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.

    2. Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.

    2. Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).

    2. Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.

    2. Create a communication/transition plan.

    2. Develop a staff education plan on changes.

    4. What change theory would be best for this program?

    4. What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?

    2. Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:

    5. Cognitive

    5. Psychomotor

    5. Effective

    2. Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.

    3. Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.

    *Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate.

    **## SIGNATUREASSIGNMENT.docx**

    SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT

    Submission Type:

    A written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length. Details below.

    Details:

    CASE Study: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the value of health information technology in the prevention and detection of errors, as well as analysis of unintended consequences and human factors through quality improvement strategies.

    1. Review the following video and documents on the case study. *

    _RaDonda Vaught speaks out_ l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQELinks to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQE). (4:56).

    Lusk, C. (2022). Reconsidering the application of systems thinking in healthcare: the RaDonda Vaught case. Available at
    [https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltextLinks to an external site.](https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(22)00262-8/fulltext)

    State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at
    [https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdfLinks to an external site.](https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf) Note pages 5-6, 50-51.

    1. Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.

    A. Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.

    B. Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.

    I. Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.

    C. Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.

    D. List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.

    2. Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.

    2. Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).

    2. Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.

    2. Create a communication/transition plan.

    2. Develop a staff education plan on changes.

    4. What change theory would be best for this program?

    4. What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?

    2. Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:

    5. Cognitive

    5. Psychomotor

    5. Effective

    2. Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.

    3. Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.

    *Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate.

  • [Solved] Nursing Nursing Signature Assignment Endometrial cancer

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This assignment aims to evaluate endometrial cancer in the general American women's population and explore current evidence-based guidelines and treatments to determine a proper care plane. – [\ \ NUR6050SignatureAssignment.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nur6050signatureassignment-docx "NU…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This assignment aims to evaluate endometrial cancer in the general American women's population and explore current evidence-based guidelines and treatments to determine a proper care plane.

    – [\
    \
    NUR6050SignatureAssignment.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/nur6050signatureassignment-docx "NUR6050SignatureAssignment.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] WK1 discussion HP 111

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    HP111: W1D What Drives Us? Before we get into the details about healthcare and its systems, let’s start at the beginning. We all bring history, sometimes a **lot** of history, into any discussion. College is a place to question some of those ingrained beliefs, listen to different points of view, and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    HP111: W1D

    What Drives Us?

    Before we get into the details about healthcare and its systems, let’s start at the

    beginning. We all bring history, sometimes a **lot** of history, into any discussion. College

    is a place to question some of those ingrained beliefs, listen to different points of view,

    and grow. Outside of your profession, you get to be…you. In the U.S. you have the right

    to free speech, free beliefs, and inalienable rights. Those can be as individual as you

    are.

    Inside your profession that is not quite true. Inside your profession you must incorporate

    the professional ethics for your area, regulatory mandates, and represent your employer

    in the fashion they determine is correct. Each of us must make peace with this or find a

    profession without this requirement. To make peace, you need to understand what your

    beliefs are. Healthcare is first and foremost a profession dedicated to people. Not just

    some people. Not just those people we personally consider ‘worthy’.

    **All** people.

    If this is a concept you cannot get behind, find another profession. Everyone, including

    you, will be better off.

    “The idea that some lives matter

    less is the root of all that is wrong

    with the world.” – Dr. Paul Farmer, PIH

    co-founder

    1Partners is Health (PIH) is a global initiative dedicated to providing healthcare to all. The

    most fundamental belief for healthcare workers regardless of specialty, is found in that

    statement above. We all must be dedicated to the provision of the best healthcare

    possible for everyone.

    **Explore what your beliefs are about healthcare.**

    Include the following aspects in the discussion:

    • Share your feelings about these four foundational principles the Partners in

    Health support.

    • Why do you think poverty is a determinant of health?

    • Discuss if healthcare should be provided for all citizens and if so, who will pick up

    the bill.

    • Cite any references. Proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling is

    required. Use your own words.

    – [\
    \
    HP111_W1D_twopart.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/hp111-w1d-twopart-pdf-10257013 "HP111_W1D_twopart.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms?.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] week 6 discussion table and case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Complete total of 3 tables Complete case study 3 questions Due in 24 hours APA format Use evidence based practice – [\ \ Week6DiscussionPartI.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week6discussionparti-docx "Week6DiscussionPartI.docx") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Complete total of 3 tables

    Complete case study 3 questions

    Due in 24 hours

    APA format

    Use evidence based practice

    – [\
    \
    Week6DiscussionPartI.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week6discussionparti-docx "Week6DiscussionPartI.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Research assessment 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## researchassessment1.pdf **## researchassessment1.pdf** Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Manage…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## researchassessment1.pdf

    **## researchassessment1.pdf**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that
    contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a
    diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U
    simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module,
    there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one
    diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence
    available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance
    safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it
    incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with
    the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care
    that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these
    factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to
    lead not only from this position but from knowledge and
    expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good
    understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well
    as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly
    resources.

    Review the What Is Scholarly? Campus page. Specifically, look at
    the following two items on the page:

    • What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    • Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which
    you will need to identify in the article you choose for this
    assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the Evidence-
    Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences library guide (found

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP)

    in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an
    article to use for this assessment.

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article,
    demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence
    related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U
    simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10
    patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one
    patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the
    Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    • Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on
    your topic.

    • Review the article for the following criteria:

    ◦ Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on
    the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    ◦ Credibility factors.

    ◦ Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    ◦ The ability to apply the content in your current
    workplace or patient population.

    • Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word
    document (see the Example of Screenshot
    [PDF] document). You can refer to the instructions in
    the Taking Screenshots [PDF] document.

    • Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the
    screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    • Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from
    Sentinel U simulation you used.

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663597/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663597/download)

    • Write up a summary of your findings on the second page.
    Note what information is important to your specified
    diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how
    useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your
    ability to apply it?

    • Include a link to your article.

    • Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for
    specific details of grading prior to submission.

    **## researchassessment1.pdf**

    Identify and write a summary of the various factors that
    contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a
    diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U
    simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module,
    there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one
    diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence
    available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance
    safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it
    incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with
    the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care
    that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these
    factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to
    lead not only from this position but from knowledge and
    expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good
    understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well
    as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly
    resources.

    Review the What Is Scholarly? Campus page. Specifically, look at
    the following two items on the page:

    • What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?

    • Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

    These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which
    you will need to identify in the article you choose for this
    assessment.

    Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the Evidence-
    Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences library guide (found

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2951)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP)

    [https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/EBP)

    in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an
    article to use for this assessment.

    Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article,
    demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence
    related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U
    simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10
    patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one
    patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.

    Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the
    Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

    • Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on
    your topic.

    • Review the article for the following criteria:

    ◦ Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on
    the pyramid of evidence, methodology).

    ◦ Credibility factors.

    ◦ Importance of content to selected diagnosis.

    ◦ The ability to apply the content in your current
    workplace or patient population.

    • Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word
    document (see the Example of Screenshot
    [PDF] document). You can refer to the instructions in
    the Taking Screenshots [PDF] document.

    • Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the
    screenshot and use that to label each criterion.

    • Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from
    Sentinel U simulation you used.

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663599/download)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663597/download](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/43539/files/7663597/download)

    • Write up a summary of your findings on the second page.
    Note what information is important to your specified
    diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how
    useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your
    ability to apply it?

    • Include a link to your article.

    • Include a reference to your article in APA format.

    Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for
    specific details of grading prior to submission.

  • [Solved] PRIMARY CARE SOAP NOTE

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PRIMARY CARE SOAP NOTE – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PRIMARY CARE SOAP NOTE

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Philosophy module 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## MODULE4PhilosophyDiscussion.docx **## MODULE4PhilosophyDiscussion.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/philosophy-module-4)**_Theories & Conceptual Models_** Evaluate theories and conceptual models from nursing and related fields for use in advanced nu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## MODULE4PhilosophyDiscussion.docx

    **## MODULE4PhilosophyDiscussion.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/philosophy-module-4)**_Theories & Conceptual Models_**

    Evaluate theories and conceptual models from nursing and related fields for use in advanced nursing practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    · Acceptable references include scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions), journal articles, and books published in the last five years-no websites to be referenced without prior approval.

    ## image1.png

    **## MODULE4PhilosophyDiscussion.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/philosophy-module-4)**_Theories & Conceptual Models_**

    Evaluate theories and conceptual models from nursing and related fields for use in advanced nursing practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Your initial post must be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least two academic sources.

    · Quotes “……” cannot be used at a higher learning level for your assignments, so sentences need to be paraphrased and referenced.

    · Acceptable references include scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions), journal articles, and books published in the last five years-no websites to be referenced without prior approval.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Change theories project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Change theories project.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] four_parts

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## four_parts.docx **## four_parts.docx** **Assignment 2. Each assignment builds off each other.** Create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional colleague. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## four_parts.docx

    **## four_parts.docx**

    **Assignment 2. Each assignment builds off each other.**

    Create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional colleague. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

    By interviewing a healthcare colleague of your choice, you will begin to gather information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing, or has experienced, in the workplace. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies that can be applied to address this problem.

    For this assessment, you will report on the information gathered during your interview. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from literature. The goal of this assessment is to analyze the interview data and identify an issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary solution. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently in use. Additionally, you will prepare for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assessment by researching change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to the issue you have identified.

    Interview Template

    ## **Interview Summary**

    Summarize your interview in this section. Be sure to relate concise information about:

    · The healthcare organization that was discussed in the interview.

    · The interviewee’s role and duties.

    · The relevant issues at the organization.

    · Any relevant comments on the actions taken by the organization or leadership previously and their effectiveness.

    · The organizational culture related to collaboration.

    · Any relevant collaboration or interdisciplinary team experience your interviewee has had.

    The goal of this section is to convey what was discussed at the interview and set yourself up to identify an issue to pursue in throughout the rest of this assessment (and future assessments in this course), as well as have enough information about the situation at the organization to relate theories, strategies, and approaches to.

    ## **Issue Identification**

    Identify the issue from the interview that you think an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach is appropriate. Provide one or more specific reasons why an interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate for the issue.

    ### **Change Theories That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    For this section look to the literature and describe one or more change theories that would help to develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the change theory?

    · How could it heal create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the theory to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Leadership Strategies That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    This section is similar to the previous one, except you will be looking to the literature to help you describe one or more leadership strategy that would help develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the leadership strategy?

    · How could it create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the strategy to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams**

    Again, this section will be similar to the previous one, except that the focus will be on collaboration approaches. Depending on if your interviewee’s organization makes frequent use of interdisciplinary teams or not, your focus in this section may be on how to establish interdisciplinary teams and a collaborative foundation or how to improve the collaboration within an already established team. You should also briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What are the best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature?

    · How could it help establish or improve collaboration?

    · How relevant is the approach to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    be sure to address the following criteria.

    · Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a healthcare organization.

    · Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

    · Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help in developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

    · Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old

    **Resources should be no more than 5 years old**

    **Demonstration of Proficiency**

    ·
    **Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.**

    ·
    **Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.**

    ·
    **Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.**

    ·
    **Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.**

    ·
    **Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan's objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.**

    ·
    **Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.**

    ·
    **Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.**

    ·
    **Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.**

    ·
    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    ·
    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.**

    ·
    **Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.**

    ·
    **Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.**

    ·
    **Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan's objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.**

    ·
    **Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.**

    ·
    **Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.**

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.**

    ·
    **Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.**

    ·
    **APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.**

    Assignment 2

    Create a 3 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue identified in the second assessment.

    Use the context of the organization from your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific organizational or patient outcome based on the information gathered in your interview.

    ## Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

    Write a brief introduction (2–3 sentences) to your proposal that outlines the issue you are attempting to solve, the part of the organization in which the plan would be carried out, and the desired outcome. This will set the stage for the sections below.

    ### Objective

    Describe what your plan will do and what you hope it will accomplish in one or two succinct sentences. Also, comment on how the objective, if achieved, will improve organizational or patient outcomes

    _._

    ### Questions and Predictions

    For this section ask yourself 3–5 questions about your objective and your overall plan. Make a prediction for each question by answering the question you posed. This helps you to define the important aspects of your plan as well as limit the scope and check its ability to be implemented.

    For example:

    1.
    _How much time will using a double-loop feedback model add to a project manager’s workload?_

    a. At first, it will likely increase their workloads by 5 to 10 percent. However, as the process is refined and project managers become more familiar and efficient, that percentage will decrease.

    ### Change Theories and Leadership Strategies

    For this section, you may wish to draw upon the research you did regarding change theories and leadership for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. The focus of this section is how those best practices will create buy-in for the project from an interdisciplinary team, improve their collaboration, and/or foster the team’s ability to implement the plan. Be sure that you are including at least one change theory and at least one leadership strategy in your explanation. Always remember to cite your sources; direct quotes require quotation marks and a page or paragraph number to be included in the citation.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the theory or strategy?

    · How will it likely help an interdisciplinary team to collaborate, implement, and/or buy in to the project plan?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation within the organizational context of the proposed plan, that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Team Collaboration Strategy

    In this section, begin by further defining the responsibilities and actions that represent the implementation of the plan. One strategy to defining this is to take a “
    _who_,
    _what_,
    _where_, and
    _when”_ approach for each team member.

    For example:

    ·
    _Project Manager A will apply the double-loop feedback model on one new product project for a single quarter._

    ·
    _Project Manager B will apply the double-loop feedback model on all new product projects for a quarter._

    _Vice President A will review the workloads of project managers using the double-loop feedback model every Thursday for one quarter._

    After you have roughly outlined the roles and responsibilities of team members, you will explain one or more collaborative approaches that will enable the team to work efficiently to achieve the plan’s objective. As with the change theories and leadership strategies, you may draw on the research you conducted for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. However, you are being asked to give a more in-depth explanation of the collaboration approaches and look at how they will help the theoretical interdisciplinary team in your plan proposal.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the collaboration approach?

    · What types of collaboration and teamwork will best help the interdisciplinary team be successful?

    · How is the collaboration approach relevant to the team’s needs and will it help drive success?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation in terms of the subject of the plan proposal; that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Required Organizational Resources

    For this section, you will be making rough estimates of the resources needed for your plan proposal to be successful. This section does not have to be exact, but the estimates should be realistic for the chosen organization. Items you should include or address in this section:

    · What are the staffing needs for your plan proposal?

    · What equipment or supplies are needed for your plan proposal?

    · Does the organization already have these?

    · If so, what are the rough financial implications associated with using these resources?

    · If not, what are the rough financial implications of acquiring these resources?

    · What access (to patients, departments, and so forth) is needed?

    · Are there any costs associated with these?

    · What are the overall financial implications for the plan proposal?

    · Staff time, resource use, resource acquisition, and access charged.

    After you have detailed your required resources, make sure that you explain any impacts on organizational resources that could happen if your plan is not undertaken and successful. In other words, if the issue you are trying to solve through your plan proposal persists or gets worse, what will be the potential costs to the organization?

    Assignment should address the following:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain organizational resources, including financial, needed for a plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to address the improvements sought by the plan.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving a plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.

    · Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

    · Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format

    Assignment 3

    Create a 12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholders or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the previous assessment.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Summarize an
    **evidence-based** interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    ·
    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors**.

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    **APA formatting:** Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and notes pages, and your reference list are in current APA style.

    Competencies measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain how an interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which a project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

    **## four_parts.docx**

    **Assignment 2. Each assignment builds off each other.**

    Create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional colleague. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

    By interviewing a healthcare colleague of your choice, you will begin to gather information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing, or has experienced, in the workplace. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies that can be applied to address this problem.

    For this assessment, you will report on the information gathered during your interview. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from literature. The goal of this assessment is to analyze the interview data and identify an issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary solution. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently in use. Additionally, you will prepare for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assessment by researching change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to the issue you have identified.

    Interview Template

    ## **Interview Summary**

    Summarize your interview in this section. Be sure to relate concise information about:

    · The healthcare organization that was discussed in the interview.

    · The interviewee’s role and duties.

    · The relevant issues at the organization.

    · Any relevant comments on the actions taken by the organization or leadership previously and their effectiveness.

    · The organizational culture related to collaboration.

    · Any relevant collaboration or interdisciplinary team experience your interviewee has had.

    The goal of this section is to convey what was discussed at the interview and set yourself up to identify an issue to pursue in throughout the rest of this assessment (and future assessments in this course), as well as have enough information about the situation at the organization to relate theories, strategies, and approaches to.

    ## **Issue Identification**

    Identify the issue from the interview that you think an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach is appropriate. Provide one or more specific reasons why an interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate for the issue.

    ### **Change Theories That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    For this section look to the literature and describe one or more change theories that would help to develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the change theory?

    · How could it heal create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the theory to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Leadership Strategies That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution**

    This section is similar to the previous one, except you will be looking to the literature to help you describe one or more leadership strategy that would help develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What is the leadership strategy?

    · How could it create an interdisciplinary solution?

    · How relevant is the strategy to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    **Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams**

    Again, this section will be similar to the previous one, except that the focus will be on collaboration approaches. Depending on if your interviewee’s organization makes frequent use of interdisciplinary teams or not, your focus in this section may be on how to establish interdisciplinary teams and a collaborative foundation or how to improve the collaboration within an already established team. You should also briefly note the relevance and credibility of the source(s) that you cite.

    Another way to think through this section is:

    · What are the best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature?

    · How could it help establish or improve collaboration?

    · How relevant is the approach to your specific identified issue?

    · How credible is the source?

    be sure to address the following criteria.

    · Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a healthcare organization.

    · Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

    · Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help in developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

    · Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old

    **Resources should be no more than 5 years old**

    **Demonstration of Proficiency**

    ·
    **Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.**

    ·
    **Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.**

    ·
    **Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.**

    ·
    **Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.**

    ·
    **Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan's objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.**

    ·
    **Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.**

    ·
    **Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.**

    ·
    **Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.**

    ·
    **Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.**

    ·
    **Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.**

    ·
    **Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.**

    ·
    **Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.**

    ·
    **Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan's objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.**

    ·
    **Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.**

    ·
    **Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.**

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.**

    ·
    **Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.**

    ·
    **APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.**

    Assignment 2

    Create a 3 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue identified in the second assessment.

    Use the context of the organization from your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific organizational or patient outcome based on the information gathered in your interview.

    ## Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

    Write a brief introduction (2–3 sentences) to your proposal that outlines the issue you are attempting to solve, the part of the organization in which the plan would be carried out, and the desired outcome. This will set the stage for the sections below.

    ### Objective

    Describe what your plan will do and what you hope it will accomplish in one or two succinct sentences. Also, comment on how the objective, if achieved, will improve organizational or patient outcomes

    _._

    ### Questions and Predictions

    For this section ask yourself 3–5 questions about your objective and your overall plan. Make a prediction for each question by answering the question you posed. This helps you to define the important aspects of your plan as well as limit the scope and check its ability to be implemented.

    For example:

    1.
    _How much time will using a double-loop feedback model add to a project manager’s workload?_

    a. At first, it will likely increase their workloads by 5 to 10 percent. However, as the process is refined and project managers become more familiar and efficient, that percentage will decrease.

    ### Change Theories and Leadership Strategies

    For this section, you may wish to draw upon the research you did regarding change theories and leadership for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. The focus of this section is how those best practices will create buy-in for the project from an interdisciplinary team, improve their collaboration, and/or foster the team’s ability to implement the plan. Be sure that you are including at least one change theory and at least one leadership strategy in your explanation. Always remember to cite your sources; direct quotes require quotation marks and a page or paragraph number to be included in the citation.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the theory or strategy?

    · How will it likely help an interdisciplinary team to collaborate, implement, and/or buy in to the project plan?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation within the organizational context of the proposed plan, that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Team Collaboration Strategy

    In this section, begin by further defining the responsibilities and actions that represent the implementation of the plan. One strategy to defining this is to take a “
    _who_,
    _what_,
    _where_, and
    _when”_ approach for each team member.

    For example:

    ·
    _Project Manager A will apply the double-loop feedback model on one new product project for a single quarter._

    ·
    _Project Manager B will apply the double-loop feedback model on all new product projects for a quarter._

    _Vice President A will review the workloads of project managers using the double-loop feedback model every Thursday for one quarter._

    After you have roughly outlined the roles and responsibilities of team members, you will explain one or more collaborative approaches that will enable the team to work efficiently to achieve the plan’s objective. As with the change theories and leadership strategies, you may draw on the research you conducted for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification assessment. However, you are being asked to give a more in-depth explanation of the collaboration approaches and look at how they will help the theoretical interdisciplinary team in your plan proposal.

    Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through the following:

    · What is the collaboration approach?

    · What types of collaboration and teamwork will best help the interdisciplinary team be successful?

    · How is the collaboration approach relevant to the team’s needs and will it help drive success?

    · Make sure to frame this explanation in terms of the subject of the plan proposal; that is, your interviewee’s organization.

    ### Required Organizational Resources

    For this section, you will be making rough estimates of the resources needed for your plan proposal to be successful. This section does not have to be exact, but the estimates should be realistic for the chosen organization. Items you should include or address in this section:

    · What are the staffing needs for your plan proposal?

    · What equipment or supplies are needed for your plan proposal?

    · Does the organization already have these?

    · If so, what are the rough financial implications associated with using these resources?

    · If not, what are the rough financial implications of acquiring these resources?

    · What access (to patients, departments, and so forth) is needed?

    · Are there any costs associated with these?

    · What are the overall financial implications for the plan proposal?

    · Staff time, resource use, resource acquisition, and access charged.

    After you have detailed your required resources, make sure that you explain any impacts on organizational resources that could happen if your plan is not undertaken and successful. In other words, if the issue you are trying to solve through your plan proposal persists or gets worse, what will be the potential costs to the organization?

    Assignment should address the following:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain organizational resources, including financial, needed for a plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to address the improvements sought by the plan.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving a plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.

    · Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

    · Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format

    Assignment 3

    Create a 12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholders or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the previous assessment.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Summarize an
    **evidence-based** interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    ·
    **Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors**.

    **Number of references:** Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

    **APA formatting:** Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and notes pages, and your reference list are in current APA style.

    Competencies measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

    · Explain how an interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

    · Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

    · Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    · Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

    · Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.

    · Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which a project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

    · Produce slides that are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.

    · Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.