Tag: Education

  • [Solved] Education 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    John Dewey has had a profound impact on Western education. His theories on the nature and purpose of education have shaped not only the American educational system but other Western Schools of education. You will: – Explain what Dewey considered to be the purpose(s) of education – Analyze at least t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    John Dewey has had a profound impact on Western education. His theories on the nature and purpose of education have shaped not only the American educational system but other Western Schools of education. You will:

    – Explain what Dewey considered to be the purpose(s) of education
    – Analyze at least three principles of Dewey’s philosophy and their influence on education
    – Assess how these principles align with the principles of an IB education

    3-4 pages in APA format. At least 2 sources.

    – [\
    \
    WasDeweyTooModern_TheModernFacesofDewey.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wasdeweytoomodern-themodernfacesofdewey-pdf "WasDeweyTooModern_TheModernFacesofDewey.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    JohnDewey.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/johndewey-pdf-10260971 "JohnDewey.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] PLAGIARISM FREE “A” WORK 15 HOURS or LESS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE UPLOAD EACH ASSIGNMENT SEPARATELY – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## ECE671Week3Journal.pdf – ## ECE671Week3Assignment.pdf **## ECE671Week3Journal.pdf** In this journal entry, you will reflect on a program you observed that either met or did not meet high-quality standards. Consider what aspect…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE UPLOAD EACH ASSIGNMENT SEPARATELY

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ECE671Week3Journal.pdf

    – ## ECE671Week3Assignment.pdf

    **## ECE671Week3Journal.pdf**

    In this journal entry, you will reflect on a program you observed that either met or did not
    meet high-quality standards. Consider what aspects of the program contributed to your
    evaluation. Did the program offer a strong curriculum? Was the environment conducive to
    learning? How did staff qualifications and family involvement play a role? This reflection
    will help you think critically about what makes a program high-quality and how you can
    apply these insights to your own practice.
    Prompts
    Address the following in your journal

    • Reflect on a program observed that either met or did not meet high-quality early
    childhood standards.

    • Describe the program and the key factors that influenced your evaluation of its
    quality. Consider factors such as curriculum, staff qualifications, family
    involvement, and the learning environment.

    • Connect your reflection to your understanding of what makes a program high-quality.
    • Length: 2 pages (or approximately 500 words).

    **## ECE671Week3Assignment.pdf**

    This week’s assignment challenges you to evaluate an early childhood program. You will
    identify key components that contribute to the program’s overall quality and propose areas
    for improvement. Whether you choose to write a traditional report or create an interactive
    report or ebook, your analysis should include a thorough evaluation of elements such as
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, and family involvement. Your goal is to
    demonstrate your ability to assess a program’s strengths and weaknesses, backed by data
    and scholarly references.

    Choose one of the following formats for submission:

    • Written report.

    • Interactive report: Design an interactive report or ebook of five pages, double-
    spaced, that includes charts, data, and a written analysis. Ensure your report is
    engaging and visually informative.

    In your project,

    • Select an early childhood program for evaluation.

    o You can choose a program you can evaluate in your area or a video online of
    an early childhood program.

    o If you observe a video of an early childhood program, be sure to include a link
    to the video you are reviewing.

    • Analyze key components that contribute to the program’s quality, including
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, family involvement, and community
    engagement.

    • Propose areas for improvement, using data, references, and written analysis to
    support your recommendations.

    The Assessing Quality in Early Childhood Education: An Evaluation of Program Standards
    and Improvements project,

    • must be 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    and formatted according to APA Style.

    • must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    o title of project in bold font

    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
    information on the title page.

    o student’s name
    o name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    o course name and number
    o instructor’s name
    o due date

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    **## ECE671Week3Assignment.pdf**

    This week’s assignment challenges you to evaluate an early childhood program. You will
    identify key components that contribute to the program’s overall quality and propose areas
    for improvement. Whether you choose to write a traditional report or create an interactive
    report or ebook, your analysis should include a thorough evaluation of elements such as
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, and family involvement. Your goal is to
    demonstrate your ability to assess a program’s strengths and weaknesses, backed by data
    and scholarly references.

    Choose one of the following formats for submission:

    • Written report.

    • Interactive report: Design an interactive report or ebook of five pages, double-
    spaced, that includes charts, data, and a written analysis. Ensure your report is
    engaging and visually informative.

    In your project,

    • Select an early childhood program for evaluation.

    o You can choose a program you can evaluate in your area or a video online of
    an early childhood program.

    o If you observe a video of an early childhood program, be sure to include a link
    to the video you are reviewing.

    • Analyze key components that contribute to the program’s quality, including
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, family involvement, and community
    engagement.

    • Propose areas for improvement, using data, references, and written analysis to
    support your recommendations.

    The Assessing Quality in Early Childhood Education: An Evaluation of Program Standards
    and Improvements project,

    • must be 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    and formatted according to APA Style.

    • must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    o title of project in bold font

    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
    information on the title page.

    o student’s name
    o name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    o course name and number
    o instructor’s name
    o due date

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    **## ECE671Week3Journal.pdf**

    In this journal entry, you will reflect on a program you observed that either met or did not
    meet high-quality standards. Consider what aspects of the program contributed to your
    evaluation. Did the program offer a strong curriculum? Was the environment conducive to
    learning? How did staff qualifications and family involvement play a role? This reflection
    will help you think critically about what makes a program high-quality and how you can
    apply these insights to your own practice.
    Prompts
    Address the following in your journal

    • Reflect on a program observed that either met or did not meet high-quality early
    childhood standards.

    • Describe the program and the key factors that influenced your evaluation of its
    quality. Consider factors such as curriculum, staff qualifications, family
    involvement, and the learning environment.

    • Connect your reflection to your understanding of what makes a program high-quality.
    • Length: 2 pages (or approximately 500 words).

    **## ECE671Week3Assignment.pdf**

    This week’s assignment challenges you to evaluate an early childhood program. You will
    identify key components that contribute to the program’s overall quality and propose areas
    for improvement. Whether you choose to write a traditional report or create an interactive
    report or ebook, your analysis should include a thorough evaluation of elements such as
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, and family involvement. Your goal is to
    demonstrate your ability to assess a program’s strengths and weaknesses, backed by data
    and scholarly references.

    Choose one of the following formats for submission:

    • Written report.

    • Interactive report: Design an interactive report or ebook of five pages, double-
    spaced, that includes charts, data, and a written analysis. Ensure your report is
    engaging and visually informative.

    In your project,

    • Select an early childhood program for evaluation.

    o You can choose a program you can evaluate in your area or a video online of
    an early childhood program.

    o If you observe a video of an early childhood program, be sure to include a link
    to the video you are reviewing.

    • Analyze key components that contribute to the program’s quality, including
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, family involvement, and community
    engagement.

    • Propose areas for improvement, using data, references, and written analysis to
    support your recommendations.

    The Assessing Quality in Early Childhood Education: An Evaluation of Program Standards
    and Improvements project,

    • must be 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    and formatted according to APA Style.

    • must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    o title of project in bold font

    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
    information on the title page.

    o student’s name
    o name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    o course name and number
    o instructor’s name
    o due date

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    **## ECE671Week3Journal.pdf**

    In this journal entry, you will reflect on a program you observed that either met or did not
    meet high-quality standards. Consider what aspects of the program contributed to your
    evaluation. Did the program offer a strong curriculum? Was the environment conducive to
    learning? How did staff qualifications and family involvement play a role? This reflection
    will help you think critically about what makes a program high-quality and how you can
    apply these insights to your own practice.
    Prompts
    Address the following in your journal

    • Reflect on a program observed that either met or did not meet high-quality early
    childhood standards.

    • Describe the program and the key factors that influenced your evaluation of its
    quality. Consider factors such as curriculum, staff qualifications, family
    involvement, and the learning environment.

    • Connect your reflection to your understanding of what makes a program high-quality.
    • Length: 2 pages (or approximately 500 words).

    **## ECE671Week3Assignment.pdf**

    This week’s assignment challenges you to evaluate an early childhood program. You will
    identify key components that contribute to the program’s overall quality and propose areas
    for improvement. Whether you choose to write a traditional report or create an interactive
    report or ebook, your analysis should include a thorough evaluation of elements such as
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, and family involvement. Your goal is to
    demonstrate your ability to assess a program’s strengths and weaknesses, backed by data
    and scholarly references.

    Choose one of the following formats for submission:

    • Written report.

    • Interactive report: Design an interactive report or ebook of five pages, double-
    spaced, that includes charts, data, and a written analysis. Ensure your report is
    engaging and visually informative.

    In your project,

    • Select an early childhood program for evaluation.

    o You can choose a program you can evaluate in your area or a video online of
    an early childhood program.

    o If you observe a video of an early childhood program, be sure to include a link
    to the video you are reviewing.

    • Analyze key components that contribute to the program’s quality, including
    curriculum, environment, staff qualifications, family involvement, and community
    engagement.

    • Propose areas for improvement, using data, references, and written analysis to
    support your recommendations.

    The Assessing Quality in Early Childhood Education: An Evaluation of Program Standards
    and Improvements project,

    • must be 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    and formatted according to APA Style.

    • must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    o title of project in bold font

    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
    information on the title page.

    o student’s name
    o name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    o course name and number
    o instructor’s name
    o due date

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

  • [Solved] OSH Journal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please view attachments – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## rrurh_UnitIV_ProjectReporztz1.doc – ## OSHUnitIVJournal.docx – QuantitativeRIskAssessment_Form1.xlsx **## rrurh_UnitIV_ProjectReporztz1.doc** [removed] **## OSHUnitIVJournal.docx** Prepare a consulting report using the [Unit IV Project …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please view attachments

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## rrurh_UnitIV_ProjectReporztz1.doc

    – ## OSHUnitIVJournal.docx

    – QuantitativeRIskAssessment_Form1.xlsx

    **## rrurh_UnitIV_ProjectReporztz1.doc**

    [removed]

    **## OSHUnitIVJournal.docx**

    Prepare a consulting report using the
    [Unit IV Project Report template](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17251304-dt-asiobject-rid-180752764_1/xid-180752764_1) which provides the following information:

    Part I: List and discuss the five steps to risk assessment and management.

    Part II: Conduct a before and after qualitative risk assessment to determine the risk level, based on the following information:

    Spillage of product along the walkway of a conveyor belt in an area creates a significant slip and trip hazard, especially when it rains (as there are significant leaks in the product shed). This area is occupied on the average with three employees per shift, which must pass through this area at least twice a day. The most likely consequence could be a significant strain or sprain to the extremities including potential permanent lumbar injuries. One option to reduce or eliminate the risk is to barricade the area and provide a secondary path. The secondary path would require employees to travel to the upper level, across and back down to this level, thus creating an additional travel time of 10 minutes each way (twice per day). Explain your reasoning why you chose the severity and probability ratings.

    Part III: Using the same information in Part II, complete a before and after quantitative risk assessment using the
    [Unit IV Project spreadsheet](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17251304-dt-asiobject-rid-137404309_1/xid-137404309_1).

    Part IV: In order to eliminate the condition of spillage along the conveyor belt identified in Part II and III, a permanent solution would be to replace the current 24” belt with a 48” belt. In order to do this, all of the rollers, framing, belt and guards must be replaced at a cost of $235,000. (Note: Some of this cost can be recovered by the prevention of lost product, but this does not factor into the cost justification process at this time.) Once completed, this project will reduce the risk by 42%. Using the William Fine method, calculate the risk score and J-value and determine:

    · whether the cost to correct a hazard is justified and

    · how quickly the hazard should be corrected.

    Your project should be a minimum three-page report using the above mentioned template. Ensure you show your equations and all work for determining answers for parts II through IV in the project document. You may either formulate the scenario equations using the Word equation formula toolbar or write out and solve your equations with answers on a separate paper. Then, take a screenshot of your work for each scenario using your phone or similar device and insert it as an image in the document. Make sure your image is clear and legible to read.

    No references are required for this assignment; however, if outside sources are used, please adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

    **QuantitativeRIskAssessment_Form1.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quantitativeriskassessment-form1-xlsx)

    **QuantitativeRIskAssessment_Form1.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quantitativeriskassessment-form1-xlsx)

    **## rrurh_UnitIV_ProjectReporztz1.doc**

    [removed]

    **## OSHUnitIVJournal.docx**

    Prepare a consulting report using the
    [Unit IV Project Report template](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17251304-dt-asiobject-rid-180752764_1/xid-180752764_1) which provides the following information:

    Part I: List and discuss the five steps to risk assessment and management.

    Part II: Conduct a before and after qualitative risk assessment to determine the risk level, based on the following information:

    Spillage of product along the walkway of a conveyor belt in an area creates a significant slip and trip hazard, especially when it rains (as there are significant leaks in the product shed). This area is occupied on the average with three employees per shift, which must pass through this area at least twice a day. The most likely consequence could be a significant strain or sprain to the extremities including potential permanent lumbar injuries. One option to reduce or eliminate the risk is to barricade the area and provide a secondary path. The secondary path would require employees to travel to the upper level, across and back down to this level, thus creating an additional travel time of 10 minutes each way (twice per day). Explain your reasoning why you chose the severity and probability ratings.

    Part III: Using the same information in Part II, complete a before and after quantitative risk assessment using the
    [Unit IV Project spreadsheet](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17251304-dt-asiobject-rid-137404309_1/xid-137404309_1).

    Part IV: In order to eliminate the condition of spillage along the conveyor belt identified in Part II and III, a permanent solution would be to replace the current 24” belt with a 48” belt. In order to do this, all of the rollers, framing, belt and guards must be replaced at a cost of $235,000. (Note: Some of this cost can be recovered by the prevention of lost product, but this does not factor into the cost justification process at this time.) Once completed, this project will reduce the risk by 42%. Using the William Fine method, calculate the risk score and J-value and determine:

    · whether the cost to correct a hazard is justified and

    · how quickly the hazard should be corrected.

    Your project should be a minimum three-page report using the above mentioned template. Ensure you show your equations and all work for determining answers for parts II through IV in the project document. You may either formulate the scenario equations using the Word equation formula toolbar or write out and solve your equations with answers on a separate paper. Then, take a screenshot of your work for each scenario using your phone or similar device and insert it as an image in the document. Make sure your image is clear and legible to read.

    No references are required for this assignment; however, if outside sources are used, please adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

    **QuantitativeRIskAssessment_Form1.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quantitativeriskassessment-form1-xlsx)

    **## rrurh_UnitIV_ProjectReporztz1.doc**

    [removed]

    **## OSHUnitIVJournal.docx**

    Prepare a consulting report using the
    [Unit IV Project Report template](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17251304-dt-asiobject-rid-180752764_1/xid-180752764_1) which provides the following information:

    Part I: List and discuss the five steps to risk assessment and management.

    Part II: Conduct a before and after qualitative risk assessment to determine the risk level, based on the following information:

    Spillage of product along the walkway of a conveyor belt in an area creates a significant slip and trip hazard, especially when it rains (as there are significant leaks in the product shed). This area is occupied on the average with three employees per shift, which must pass through this area at least twice a day. The most likely consequence could be a significant strain or sprain to the extremities including potential permanent lumbar injuries. One option to reduce or eliminate the risk is to barricade the area and provide a secondary path. The secondary path would require employees to travel to the upper level, across and back down to this level, thus creating an additional travel time of 10 minutes each way (twice per day). Explain your reasoning why you chose the severity and probability ratings.

    Part III: Using the same information in Part II, complete a before and after quantitative risk assessment using the
    [Unit IV Project spreadsheet](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17251304-dt-asiobject-rid-137404309_1/xid-137404309_1).

    Part IV: In order to eliminate the condition of spillage along the conveyor belt identified in Part II and III, a permanent solution would be to replace the current 24” belt with a 48” belt. In order to do this, all of the rollers, framing, belt and guards must be replaced at a cost of $235,000. (Note: Some of this cost can be recovered by the prevention of lost product, but this does not factor into the cost justification process at this time.) Once completed, this project will reduce the risk by 42%. Using the William Fine method, calculate the risk score and J-value and determine:

    · whether the cost to correct a hazard is justified and

    · how quickly the hazard should be corrected.

    Your project should be a minimum three-page report using the above mentioned template. Ensure you show your equations and all work for determining answers for parts II through IV in the project document. You may either formulate the scenario equations using the Word equation formula toolbar or write out and solve your equations with answers on a separate paper. Then, take a screenshot of your work for each scenario using your phone or similar device and insert it as an image in the document. Make sure your image is clear and legible to read.

    No references are required for this assignment; however, if outside sources are used, please adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

    **QuantitativeRIskAssessment_Form1.xlsx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quantitativeriskassessment-form1-xlsx)

  • [Solved] Education Assignment 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Assignment5.docx **## Assignment5.docx** **Due 4/16/2025** No more than 550 words Continuing with information from readings as well as other sources, examine and reflect on these topics: · Recognize avoidance of outmoded management models, · Understand the drawbacks …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assignment5.docx

    **## Assignment5.docx**

    **Due 4/16/2025**

    No more than 550 words

    Continuing with information from readings as well as other sources, examine and reflect on these topics:

    · Recognize avoidance of outmoded management models,

    · Understand the drawbacks of top-down supervisory approaches,

    · The nexus of leadership.

    Your paper should include citations from texts.

    English, F. W. (2010). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning and leading the curriculum (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    **## Assignment5.docx**

    **Due 4/16/2025**

    No more than 550 words

    Continuing with information from readings as well as other sources, examine and reflect on these topics:

    · Recognize avoidance of outmoded management models,

    · Understand the drawbacks of top-down supervisory approaches,

    · The nexus of leadership.

    Your paper should include citations from texts.

    English, F. W. (2010). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning and leading the curriculum (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  • [Solved] Reflection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## reflection.docx – Values.pdf **## reflection.docx** **Due 4/16/2025** No more than 265 words. Chat Activity: Read and REFLECT on Values and Beliefs: The World View Behind Curriculum. Respond to: The article discusses values and beliefs which affect thoughts about cur…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## reflection.docx

    – Values.pdf

    **## reflection.docx**

    **Due 4/16/2025**

    No more than 265 words.

    Chat Activity: Read and REFLECT on Values and Beliefs: The World View Behind Curriculum.  Respond to: The article discusses values and beliefs which affect thoughts about curriculum development and purpose. After giving reflective thought to the statements presented in the article, compose a brief description of the values and beliefs you hold regarding curriculum development and purpose. Defend your position(s).

    **Values.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/values-pdf-10261089)

    **Values.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/values-pdf-10261089)

    **## reflection.docx**

    **Due 4/16/2025**

    No more than 265 words.

    Chat Activity: Read and REFLECT on Values and Beliefs: The World View Behind Curriculum.  Respond to: The article discusses values and beliefs which affect thoughts about curriculum development and purpose. After giving reflective thought to the statements presented in the article, compose a brief description of the values and beliefs you hold regarding curriculum development and purpose. Defend your position(s).

    **Values.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/values-pdf-10261089)

    **## reflection.docx**

    **Due 4/16/2025**

    No more than 265 words.

    Chat Activity: Read and REFLECT on Values and Beliefs: The World View Behind Curriculum.  Respond to: The article discusses values and beliefs which affect thoughts about curriculum development and purpose. After giving reflective thought to the statements presented in the article, compose a brief description of the values and beliefs you hold regarding curriculum development and purpose. Defend your position(s).

    **Values.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/values-pdf-10261089)

  • [Solved] Fieldwork Project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Fieldwork Project.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] NEED IN 5 HOURS or LESS (NO EXCEPTIONS)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE POST EACH DISCUSSION SEPARATELY – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## ECE671Week3Discussion.pdf **## ECE671Week3Discussion.pdf** Respond thoughtfully to at least two classmates, offering insights or asking questions that further the discussion on high- quality programs and diversity. DISCUSSION 1 …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE POST EACH DISCUSSION SEPARATELY

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## ECE671Week3Discussion.pdf

    **## ECE671Week3Discussion.pdf**

    Respond thoughtfully to at least two classmates, offering
    insights or asking questions that further the discussion on high-
    quality programs and diversity.

    DISCUSSION 1 (Letaysha)

    In today's society, education is needed for all children. Early childhood
    programs are very important. It helps children between the ages of birth to five
    years old grow through their developmental domains which are language,
    social-emotional, cognitive and physical. Maintaining a high-quality early
    childhood program takes a lot of work and lots of practice. Some
    characteristics of upholding a high-quality early childhood program are as
    follows:

    • Creating a nurturing environment for children
    • Hiring honorable staff who are certified and withhold valuable childcare

    experience
    • Implementing developmentally appropriate practices
    • Collaborating with families and the local community
    • Matching staff to student ratios
    • Implementing a curriculum that promotes children's interest, curiosity

    and learning style
    • Creating learning instruction that meets the individual needs of children
    • Respecting cultural and religious backgrounds of children and families

    High quality early childhood programs meet the needs of diverse children,
    families and communities by creating inclusive learning environments.
    Allowing children with special needs, esl learners and those of specific
    backgrounds to come together in one setting and learn from one another.
    Providing learning materials and creating activities that are diverse and
    accessible to all children. Celebrating cultural holidays, hosting school events
    that represent the diversity of the program. Including families in decision-
    making as it pertains to their child's learning development. Most importantly,
    communication. Effective communication helps to build strong, long-lasting
    relationships with families. Keeping communication open and clear develops
    trust within both parties. Any program can be high-quality and the best of the
    best. However, it takes motivated and driven individuals to keep the program
    afloat.

    [https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/144351/users/251498](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/144351/users/251498)

    Respond thoughtfully to at least two classmates, offering
    insights or asking questions that further the discussion on high-
    quality programs and diversity.

    DISCUSSION 2 (Dorry)

    Culturally appropriate and age-appropriate play-based learning should take
    precedence in the curriculum. Kids will be enticed to explore and learn by
    doing this. If we want children to develop a love of learning, we need a
    curriculum that can adapt to their unique learning styles.
    It is also crucial that the workforce has the proper credentials and continues
    to develop professionally. Early childhood education credentials, including
    degrees and certifications, are essential for educators.
    In addition, they should stay up to date with educational practices. For
    effective programs, staff-to-child ratios are crucial in ensuring that each child
    receives the necessary support and individual attention.
    Additionally important is the location of your learning. Adapting to the
    children's needs and experiences while being safe, entertaining, and inviting is
    crucial for a high-quality program. Spaces indoors and outdoors should be
    inviting places to discover new things, meet new people, and have a good
    time.
    Family involvement is crucial for fostering strong ties between home and
    school. Programs might achieve this goal by providing daily updates, giving
    families a voice in decision-making, and providing resources like workshops
    and tools to help parents support their children's learning at home.
    Community involvement also improves the program's effectiveness. Families
    and children can receive additional support and develop a sense of belonging
    by collaborating with local organizations and services.
    Quality programs use inclusion tactics that consider and celebrate cultural
    differences to support every kid and family. They extend the opportunity to
    participate in enjoyable activities and achieve academic success to all
    children, including those with special needs.
    Good early childhood programs are like ecosystems in that they thrive when
    all members are cooperative, adaptable, and committed to assisting each
    child in realizing their maximum potential.

    **## ECE671Week3Discussion.pdf**

    Respond thoughtfully to at least two classmates, offering
    insights or asking questions that further the discussion on high-
    quality programs and diversity.

    DISCUSSION 1 (Letaysha)

    In today's society, education is needed for all children. Early childhood
    programs are very important. It helps children between the ages of birth to five
    years old grow through their developmental domains which are language,
    social-emotional, cognitive and physical. Maintaining a high-quality early
    childhood program takes a lot of work and lots of practice. Some
    characteristics of upholding a high-quality early childhood program are as
    follows:

    • Creating a nurturing environment for children
    • Hiring honorable staff who are certified and withhold valuable childcare

    experience
    • Implementing developmentally appropriate practices
    • Collaborating with families and the local community
    • Matching staff to student ratios
    • Implementing a curriculum that promotes children's interest, curiosity

    and learning style
    • Creating learning instruction that meets the individual needs of children
    • Respecting cultural and religious backgrounds of children and families

    High quality early childhood programs meet the needs of diverse children,
    families and communities by creating inclusive learning environments.
    Allowing children with special needs, esl learners and those of specific
    backgrounds to come together in one setting and learn from one another.
    Providing learning materials and creating activities that are diverse and
    accessible to all children. Celebrating cultural holidays, hosting school events
    that represent the diversity of the program. Including families in decision-
    making as it pertains to their child's learning development. Most importantly,
    communication. Effective communication helps to build strong, long-lasting
    relationships with families. Keeping communication open and clear develops
    trust within both parties. Any program can be high-quality and the best of the
    best. However, it takes motivated and driven individuals to keep the program
    afloat.

    [https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/144351/users/251498](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/144351/users/251498)

    Respond thoughtfully to at least two classmates, offering
    insights or asking questions that further the discussion on high-
    quality programs and diversity.

    DISCUSSION 2 (Dorry)

    Culturally appropriate and age-appropriate play-based learning should take
    precedence in the curriculum. Kids will be enticed to explore and learn by
    doing this. If we want children to develop a love of learning, we need a
    curriculum that can adapt to their unique learning styles.
    It is also crucial that the workforce has the proper credentials and continues
    to develop professionally. Early childhood education credentials, including
    degrees and certifications, are essential for educators.
    In addition, they should stay up to date with educational practices. For
    effective programs, staff-to-child ratios are crucial in ensuring that each child
    receives the necessary support and individual attention.
    Additionally important is the location of your learning. Adapting to the
    children's needs and experiences while being safe, entertaining, and inviting is
    crucial for a high-quality program. Spaces indoors and outdoors should be
    inviting places to discover new things, meet new people, and have a good
    time.
    Family involvement is crucial for fostering strong ties between home and
    school. Programs might achieve this goal by providing daily updates, giving
    families a voice in decision-making, and providing resources like workshops
    and tools to help parents support their children's learning at home.
    Community involvement also improves the program's effectiveness. Families
    and children can receive additional support and develop a sense of belonging
    by collaborating with local organizations and services.
    Quality programs use inclusion tactics that consider and celebrate cultural
    differences to support every kid and family. They extend the opportunity to
    participate in enjoyable activities and achieve academic success to all
    children, including those with special needs.
    Good early childhood programs are like ecosystems in that they thrive when
    all members are cooperative, adaptable, and committed to assisting each
    child in realizing their maximum potential.

  • [Solved] Learning Theory 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Examine Figure 6.1 Perspectives on Learning Environments (p. 134) of the Bransford text. The diagram illustrates the intersection of learner-centered, knowledge-centered, and assessment-centered learning environments embedded within a community setting. – Describe a learning environment that demonst…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Examine Figure 6.1 Perspectives on Learning Environments (p. 134) of the Bransford text. The diagram illustrates the intersection of learner-centered, knowledge-centered, and assessment-centered learning environments embedded within a community setting.

    – Describe a learning environment that demonstrates the point at which each of the three circles intersects.  If you are working in a school, base your answer on the current curriculum. Use your content area, your student demographics, school program policies, etc. to illustrate your response. If you are not currently teaching, you can base your answer on a school in your community. Clearly, you are writing about a ‘perfect situation’ which is unlikely to exist given the diversity of challenges classroom teachers encounter. Instead, you are writing towards a ‘best case scenario’. What would need to happen at your school in order to align each of the learning environments as depicted in Figure 6.1?
    – As you formulate your response, consider how you define ‘learning’ in each of the three learning environments. Do expectations for knowledge acquisition change?
    – Finally, given the way in which you have aligned your school program with Figure 6.1 Perspectives on Learning Environments, discuss at least one implication for how you provide (or would provide if you were teaching) instruction in your classroom now. Consider how practices that balance learner-centered, knowledge-centered, and assessment-centered learning environments embedded within a community setting might inform your current pedagogy.

    2-3 pages in length using APA format. at least 2 sources

    – [\
    \
    Fig6.1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/fig6-1-pdf "Fig6.1.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] madam michelle

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering madam michelle.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Education I need help with homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help with my homework – 2 years ago **files (4)** – ## RequiredResources.docx – ## week2SmallGroupInstruction1.docx – ## week2instructionforweek2worksheetwithRubric.docx – week-1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx **## RequiredResources.docx** Required Resources **Teaching Reading in Today’s Ele…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help with my homework

    – 2 years ago

    **files (4)**

    – ## RequiredResources.docx

    – ## week2SmallGroupInstruction1.docx

    – ## week2instructionforweek2worksheetwithRubric.docx

    – week-1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx

    **## RequiredResources.docx**

    Required Resources

    **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

    **Required**

    Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
    _Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

    How to Set Up Interest-Based Reading Groups

    **Required**

    Read “How to Set Up Interest-Based Reading Groups” by Wright and Hoonan on the Edutopia website (2019).

    [https://www.edutopia.org/arti](https://www.edutopia.org/arti)

    How to Use Data to Create Small Reading Groups

    **Required**

    Read “How to Use Data to Create Small Reading Groups,” by Schmidt, on the NWEA website (2017).

    https://www.nwea.org/blog/2017/use-data-create-small-reading-groups/

    Strategies for Improving Small Group Instruction

    **Required**

    You can read Miller's “Strategies for Improving Small Group Instruction " on the Edutopia website (2020).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/strategies-improving-small-group-instruction

    Grouping Students Who Struggle with Reading

    **Required**

    Read “Grouping Students Who Struggle with Reading” by Vaughn et al. on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.or

    **## week2SmallGroupInstruction1.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20899321)_

    **Small Group Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Standards-Based Small Group Support**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **National/State Reading Standard** |
    | |
    | **Learning Target/Objective (LO)** |
    | |
    | **Instructional Strategy**<br>_In 75-100 words describe a strategy or activity to support each group’s learning._ | **Progress Monitoring Tool**<br>_Identify one progress monitoring tool you can use throughout the small group activity._ |
    | **Group 1: Exceeded the Standard and LO (Enrichment)** |
    | | |
    | **Group 2: Met the Standard and LO (Reinforcement)** |
    | | |
    | **Group 3: Did Not Meet the Standard and/or LO (Reteach)** |
    | | |

    **Part 2: Research and Reflect on Approaches to Small Group Instruction**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Reflection** |
    | |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## week2instructionforweek2worksheetwithRubric.docx**

    Small group reading instruction allows teachers to differentiate learning based on the students’ needs and interests and allows for flexibility. There are a variety of methods for grouping students and potential benefits in each type of grouping. Student progress must be monitored during small group instruction to determine proper grouping, check for mastery, and assess lesson effectiveness.

    **Part 1:** **Standards-Based Small Group Support**

    Imagine that you have taught the whole class reading lesson from Topic 1 and given the summative assessment. Based on the data collected, some of the students in your class need reteaching, some need reinforcement, and some need enrichment. In Part 1 of the “Small Group Reading Instruction” template, describe the instructional strategy or activity you would use with each small group of students and the progress monitoring tool you would use throughout the small group lesson. Use the same standard and learning objective used in the Topic 1 Part 3 lesson and apply any instructor feedback you have received.

    **Part 2: Research and Reflect on Approaches to Small Group Instruction**

    Using the topic Resources and your own research, reflect in 250-500 words on approaches to small group instruction. In your reflection include the following information:

    · Explain the purpose of guided reading and best practices when providing guided reading instruction, including an appropriate approach to grouping students.

    · Describe one method for structuring guided reading lessons.

    · Explain how guided reading can fit into a literacy block and how it connects to whole group instruction.

    · There are many ways to group students for small reading group instruction. Describe one additional approach to grouping students, explain the purpose of that grouping approach, and discuss the benefits to student learning.

    Support the assignment with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric Criteria**

    expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All

    **Part 1: Group 1**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 1

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing enrichment is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing enrichment is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool identified is suitable.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 1: Group 2**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 2

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reinforcement is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reinforcement is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool identified is suitable.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 1: Group 3**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 3

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reteaching is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reteaching is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Purpose and Best Practices of Guided Reading**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Purpose and Best Practices of Guided Reading

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    The explanation of the purpose of guided reading is in-depth. Best practices when providing guided reading instruction are expertly identified.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    An explanation of the purpose of guided reading is complete. Best practices when providing guided reading instruction are

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Structuring and Scheduling Guided Reading Lessons**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Structuring and Scheduling Guided Reading Lessons

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Description of one method for structuring guided reading lessons is superior. Explanation of how guided reading fits into a literacy block and connects to whole group instruction is insightful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Description of one method for structuring guided reading lessons is practical. An explanation of how guided reading fits into a literacy block and connects to whole group instruction is logical.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Approach to Grouping Students**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Approach to Grouping Students

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Description of an additional approach to grouping students for small group reading instruction is sophisticated. Explanation of the purpose of the grouping approach and benefits to student learning is thought-provoking.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Description of an additional approach to grouping students for small group reading instruction is concise. Explanation of the purpose of the grouping approach and benefits to student learning is significant.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Template Format**

    3.25 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Template Format

    **5. Target**

    3.25 points

    Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

    **4. Acceptable**

    2.83 points

    Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    **week-1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week-1-planningreadinginstruction-docx-10261587)

    **week-1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week-1-planningreadinginstruction-docx-10261587)

    **## RequiredResources.docx**

    Required Resources

    **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

    **Required**

    Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
    _Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

    How to Set Up Interest-Based Reading Groups

    **Required**

    Read “How to Set Up Interest-Based Reading Groups” by Wright and Hoonan on the Edutopia website (2019).

    [https://www.edutopia.org/arti](https://www.edutopia.org/arti)

    How to Use Data to Create Small Reading Groups

    **Required**

    Read “How to Use Data to Create Small Reading Groups,” by Schmidt, on the NWEA website (2017).

    https://www.nwea.org/blog/2017/use-data-create-small-reading-groups/

    Strategies for Improving Small Group Instruction

    **Required**

    You can read Miller's “Strategies for Improving Small Group Instruction " on the Edutopia website (2020).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/strategies-improving-small-group-instruction

    Grouping Students Who Struggle with Reading

    **Required**

    Read “Grouping Students Who Struggle with Reading” by Vaughn et al. on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.or

    **## week2SmallGroupInstruction1.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20899321)_

    **Small Group Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Standards-Based Small Group Support**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **National/State Reading Standard** |
    | |
    | **Learning Target/Objective (LO)** |
    | |
    | **Instructional Strategy**<br>_In 75-100 words describe a strategy or activity to support each group’s learning._ | **Progress Monitoring Tool**<br>_Identify one progress monitoring tool you can use throughout the small group activity._ |
    | **Group 1: Exceeded the Standard and LO (Enrichment)** |
    | | |
    | **Group 2: Met the Standard and LO (Reinforcement)** |
    | | |
    | **Group 3: Did Not Meet the Standard and/or LO (Reteach)** |
    | | |

    **Part 2: Research and Reflect on Approaches to Small Group Instruction**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Reflection** |
    | |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## week2instructionforweek2worksheetwithRubric.docx**

    Small group reading instruction allows teachers to differentiate learning based on the students’ needs and interests and allows for flexibility. There are a variety of methods for grouping students and potential benefits in each type of grouping. Student progress must be monitored during small group instruction to determine proper grouping, check for mastery, and assess lesson effectiveness.

    **Part 1:** **Standards-Based Small Group Support**

    Imagine that you have taught the whole class reading lesson from Topic 1 and given the summative assessment. Based on the data collected, some of the students in your class need reteaching, some need reinforcement, and some need enrichment. In Part 1 of the “Small Group Reading Instruction” template, describe the instructional strategy or activity you would use with each small group of students and the progress monitoring tool you would use throughout the small group lesson. Use the same standard and learning objective used in the Topic 1 Part 3 lesson and apply any instructor feedback you have received.

    **Part 2: Research and Reflect on Approaches to Small Group Instruction**

    Using the topic Resources and your own research, reflect in 250-500 words on approaches to small group instruction. In your reflection include the following information:

    · Explain the purpose of guided reading and best practices when providing guided reading instruction, including an appropriate approach to grouping students.

    · Describe one method for structuring guided reading lessons.

    · Explain how guided reading can fit into a literacy block and how it connects to whole group instruction.

    · There are many ways to group students for small reading group instruction. Describe one additional approach to grouping students, explain the purpose of that grouping approach, and discuss the benefits to student learning.

    Support the assignment with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric Criteria**

    expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All

    **Part 1: Group 1**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 1

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing enrichment is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing enrichment is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool identified is suitable.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 1: Group 2**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 2

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reinforcement is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reinforcement is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool identified is suitable.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 1: Group 3**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 3

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reteaching is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reteaching is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Purpose and Best Practices of Guided Reading**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Purpose and Best Practices of Guided Reading

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    The explanation of the purpose of guided reading is in-depth. Best practices when providing guided reading instruction are expertly identified.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    An explanation of the purpose of guided reading is complete. Best practices when providing guided reading instruction are

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Structuring and Scheduling Guided Reading Lessons**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Structuring and Scheduling Guided Reading Lessons

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Description of one method for structuring guided reading lessons is superior. Explanation of how guided reading fits into a literacy block and connects to whole group instruction is insightful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Description of one method for structuring guided reading lessons is practical. An explanation of how guided reading fits into a literacy block and connects to whole group instruction is logical.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Approach to Grouping Students**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Approach to Grouping Students

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Description of an additional approach to grouping students for small group reading instruction is sophisticated. Explanation of the purpose of the grouping approach and benefits to student learning is thought-provoking.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Description of an additional approach to grouping students for small group reading instruction is concise. Explanation of the purpose of the grouping approach and benefits to student learning is significant.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Template Format**

    3.25 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Template Format

    **5. Target**

    3.25 points

    Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

    **4. Acceptable**

    2.83 points

    Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    **week-1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week-1-planningreadinginstruction-docx-10261587)

    **## RequiredResources.docx**

    Required Resources

    **Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools**

    **Required**

    Roe, B. D., Smith, S. H., & Kolodziej, N. J. (2019).
    _Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools_(12th ed.). Cengage. ISBN-13: 9781337566292

    How to Set Up Interest-Based Reading Groups

    **Required**

    Read “How to Set Up Interest-Based Reading Groups” by Wright and Hoonan on the Edutopia website (2019).

    [https://www.edutopia.org/arti](https://www.edutopia.org/arti)

    How to Use Data to Create Small Reading Groups

    **Required**

    Read “How to Use Data to Create Small Reading Groups,” by Schmidt, on the NWEA website (2017).

    https://www.nwea.org/blog/2017/use-data-create-small-reading-groups/

    Strategies for Improving Small Group Instruction

    **Required**

    You can read Miller's “Strategies for Improving Small Group Instruction " on the Edutopia website (2020).

    https://www.edutopia.org/article/strategies-improving-small-group-instruction

    Grouping Students Who Struggle with Reading

    **Required**

    Read “Grouping Students Who Struggle with Reading” by Vaughn et al. on the Reading Rockets website.

    https://www.readingrockets.or

    **## week2SmallGroupInstruction1.docx**

    _![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-i-need-help-with-homework-20899321)_

    **Small Group Reading Instruction**

    **Part 1: Standards-Based Small Group Support**

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **National/State Reading Standard** |
    | |
    | **Learning Target/Objective (LO)** |
    | |
    | **Instructional Strategy**<br>_In 75-100 words describe a strategy or activity to support each group’s learning._ | **Progress Monitoring Tool**<br>_Identify one progress monitoring tool you can use throughout the small group activity._ |
    | **Group 1: Exceeded the Standard and LO (Enrichment)** |
    | | |
    | **Group 2: Met the Standard and LO (Reinforcement)** |
    | | |
    | **Group 3: Did Not Meet the Standard and/or LO (Reteach)** |
    | | |

    **Part 2: Research and Reflect on Approaches to Small Group Instruction**

    | |
    | — |
    | **Reflection** |
    | |

    **References**

    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    **image1.jpeg**

    **## week2instructionforweek2worksheetwithRubric.docx**

    Small group reading instruction allows teachers to differentiate learning based on the students’ needs and interests and allows for flexibility. There are a variety of methods for grouping students and potential benefits in each type of grouping. Student progress must be monitored during small group instruction to determine proper grouping, check for mastery, and assess lesson effectiveness.

    **Part 1:** **Standards-Based Small Group Support**

    Imagine that you have taught the whole class reading lesson from Topic 1 and given the summative assessment. Based on the data collected, some of the students in your class need reteaching, some need reinforcement, and some need enrichment. In Part 1 of the “Small Group Reading Instruction” template, describe the instructional strategy or activity you would use with each small group of students and the progress monitoring tool you would use throughout the small group lesson. Use the same standard and learning objective used in the Topic 1 Part 3 lesson and apply any instructor feedback you have received.

    **Part 2: Research and Reflect on Approaches to Small Group Instruction**

    Using the topic Resources and your own research, reflect in 250-500 words on approaches to small group instruction. In your reflection include the following information:

    · Explain the purpose of guided reading and best practices when providing guided reading instruction, including an appropriate approach to grouping students.

    · Describe one method for structuring guided reading lessons.

    · Explain how guided reading can fit into a literacy block and how it connects to whole group instruction.

    · There are many ways to group students for small reading group instruction. Describe one additional approach to grouping students, explain the purpose of that grouping approach, and discuss the benefits to student learning.

    Support the assignment with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **Rubric Criteria**

    expand all Rubric CriteriaExpand All

    **Part 1: Group 1**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 1

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing enrichment is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing enrichment is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool identified is suitable.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 1: Group 2**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 2

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reinforcement is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reinforcement is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool identified is suitable.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 1: Group 3**

    9.75 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 1: Group 3

    **5. Target**

    9.75 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reteaching is novel. The progress monitoring tool identified is ideal.

    **4. Acceptable**

    8.48 points

    The strategy or activity to support a group of students needing reteaching is appropriate. The progress monitoring tool

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Purpose and Best Practices of Guided Reading**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Purpose and Best Practices of Guided Reading

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    The explanation of the purpose of guided reading is in-depth. Best practices when providing guided reading instruction are expertly identified.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    An explanation of the purpose of guided reading is complete. Best practices when providing guided reading instruction are

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Structuring and Scheduling Guided Reading Lessons**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Structuring and Scheduling Guided Reading Lessons

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Description of one method for structuring guided reading lessons is superior. Explanation of how guided reading fits into a literacy block and connects to whole group instruction is insightful.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Description of one method for structuring guided reading lessons is practical. An explanation of how guided reading fits into a literacy block and connects to whole group instruction is logical.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Part 2: Approach to Grouping Students**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Part 2: Approach to Grouping Students

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Description of an additional approach to grouping students for small group reading instruction is sophisticated. Explanation of the purpose of the grouping approach and benefits to student learning is thought-provoking.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Description of an additional approach to grouping students for small group reading instruction is concise. Explanation of the purpose of the grouping approach and benefits to student learning is significant.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Template Format**

    3.25 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Template Format

    **5. Target**

    3.25 points

    Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

    **4. Acceptable**

    2.83 points

    Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    **No Submission**

    0 points

    Not addressed.

    **Mechanics of Writing**

    6.5 points

    **Criteria Description**

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    **5. Target**

    6.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    **4. Acceptable**

    5.66 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    **week-1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week-1-planningreadinginstruction-docx-10261587)