Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Tiff week 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Tiff week 7 – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## Unit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF – ## Presentation5.PDF – PresentationNU760-8H.pptx **## Unit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF** 1 Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework Tiffany Williams Herzing University NU760-8H 3…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Tiff week 7

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## Unit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF

    – ## Presentation5.PDF

    – PresentationNU760-8H.pptx

    **## Unit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF**

    1

    Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework

    Tiffany Williams

    Herzing University

    NU760-8H

    3/22/2025

    2

    Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework

    Gap recognition and filling in providing care are important to improving patient

    outcomes and staying compliant with evidence-based practice. The paper outlines a practice

    problem recognized in a clinical environment, formulates a problem statement, builds an aim

    statement, and names a framework that will be employed in creating a scholarly project to

    address the problem.

    Practice Setting and Population

    The practice setting is a primary care clinic with an adult patient population of 18 years

    and older. The clinic provides preventive care, chronic disease management, and acute care. The

    population consists of people from various socioeconomic statuses, with a high proportion of

    them being underserved and at risk for chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and

    cardiovascular disease. Despite evidence-based guidelines for preventive care, a conspicuous

    lack of uniform implementation of recommended screenings and interventions is observed.

    Description of the Problem

    The identified issue is the uneven application of United States Preventive Services Task

    Force (USPSTF) preventive screening guidelines, specifically cardiovascular risk factors for

    illness such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia (Barry et al., 2023). Chart review and

    observations revealed that the majority of patients with the routine screening due are not being

    screened on time in reality. Clinic performance indicators also confirm this deficiency, where

    65% of eligible patients for indicated screenings are receiving them only, falling short of the

    organization's goal of 90%.

    3

    Failure to screen per guidelines has various implications. Firstly, to delay earlier illness

    diagnosis that would otherwise be better treated through intervention earlier in the disease

    development process. Secondly, to develop avoidable complications like a heart attack or stroke,

    which would otherwise have been avoided by earlier identification and treatment. Thirdly,

    evidence-based care shortfall has been established, one of the indicators for quality health care.

    Problem Statement

    Processes of patient evaluation in the primary care clinic have not been consistent in

    adhering to USPSTF guidelines for preventive screening until now. This results in premature

    diagnosis of cardiovascular risk factors, which means unhealthy consequences that otherwise

    would have been averted if there was timely intervention.

    Aim Statement

    This project aims to increase follow-through with USPSTF recommendations for

    preventive screening, specifically cardiovascular disease risk factors, to 90% from 65% in a six-

    month period. This will be achieved by having a standardized screening process, educating staff

    on evidence-based recommendations, and reminders in the electronic health record system to

    trigger providers at the point of patient visits.

    Framework

    The model to implement with this project is the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, an

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) quality improvement model. The PDSA cycle is a

    rigorous cycle of testing and implementing changes at an organizational level (Roberti et al.,

    2025). The PDSA cycle contains four steps:

    1. Plan: Identify the problem, establish goals, and prepare for change.

    4

    2. Do: Implement the change at a trim level.

    3. Study: Compare results and determine if improvement was a consequence of the

    change.

    4. Act: Simplify the change from the result and implement it on an expanded scale.

    PDSA cycling is suitable for this project because it allows incremental testing of

    interventions such as the protocolized screening process and EHR reminders before large-scale

    implementation. It also addresses the project goal of quantitatively measuring improved

    screening rates. For example, at the "Plan" phase, the protocol for screening and EHR reminder

    design will be developed by the team. At the "Do" phase, the interventions will be pilot-tested

    with a small number of providers. The "Study" phase will entail screening rate monitoring and

    provider feedback collection, and the "Act" phase will entail scaling up proven interventions.

    Conclusion

    The inconsistent compliance with USPSTF guidelines for preventive screening within the

    primary clinic is a grave evidence-based practice deficit. By developing an obvious problem

    statement, formulating an aim statement concisely, and employing the PDSA cycle as an

    orienting framework, this project proposes to enhance screening rates and ultimately enhance

    patient outcomes. The structured process of the PDSA cycle ensures interventions are tested,

    refined, and implemented in such a way as to maximize their effectiveness and sustainability.

    5

    References

    Barry, M. J., Wolff, T. A., Pbert, L., Davidson, K. W., Fan, T. M., Krist, A. H., … & Nicholson,

    W. K. (2023). Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US Preventive Services

    Task Force methods for developing recommendations for preventive services. The Annals

    of Family Medicine, 21(2), 165-171.

    https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf

    Roberti, J., Jorro-Barón, F., Ini, N., Guglielmino, M., Rodríguez, A. P., Echave, C., … & Alonso,

    J. P. (2025). Improving Antibiotic Use in Argentine Pediatric Hospitals: A Process

    Evaluation Using Normalization Process Theory. Pediatric Quality & Safety, 10(1), e788.

    https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-

    202501000-00010

    [https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf](https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    **## Presentation5.PDF**

    Enhancing Compliance with
    USPSTF Preventive Screening
    Guidelines

    TIFFANY WILLIAMS

    HERZING UNIVERSITY

    NU760-8H

    4/15/2025

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Problem Statement and Aim Statement

     Problem Statement: Inconsistent adherence to USPSTF cardiovascular

    screening guidelines in a rural primary care clinic.

     Results in delayed diagnoses, missed preventive opportunities, and

    increased morbidity.

     Aim Statement: Improve compliance with USPSTF screening from 65% to

    90% over 6 months.

     Addresses cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia,

    and diabetes.

     Focus on equity: Enhance care for underserved populations in a rural

    setting.

    Selected

    Strategy/Intervention

     Implementation of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

    quality improvement framework.

     Incorporation of EHR reminders for screening

    adherence.

     Staff education sessions to reinforce USPSTF

    guideline adherence.

     Pilot test with 2–3 providers before full clinic rollout.

     Strategy is evidence-based and allows for

    continuous quality improvement (Manandi et al.,

    2023).

    Anticipated Outcomes

     Increase screening compliance to at
    least 90% within 6 months.

     Earlier identification of cardiovascular risk
    factors.

     Improved provider knowledge and
    confidence in following screening
    guidelines.

     Enhanced patient safety and health
    outcomes through preventive care.

     Promote a culture of accountability and
    evidence-based practice.

    Evaluation Measures

     Outcome Measures: Percentage of eligible
    patients who received all USPSTF-recommended
    screenings.

     Process Measures: Number of providers using EHR
    reminders and attending education sessions.

     Structure Measures: Availability of EHR decision
    support and training resources.

     Direct Measures: Audit of chart data for
    completed screenings.

     Support from literature: Structured evaluations
    improve sustainability of quality initiatives (Roberti
    et al., 2025).

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Required Information/Data

     Total number of eligible patients seen in the clinic monthly.

     Percentage of patients up-to-date on screenings pre- and post-
    intervention.

     EHR logs to track provider engagement with reminders.

     Staff participation data from educational sessions.

     Collect both quantitative metrics and qualitative feedback for robust

    analysis (Barry et al., 2023).

    Data Collection Method 1:

    EHR Chart Review

     Use EHR audit reports to assess screening

    completion rates.

     Track use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools

    by providers.

     Identify patients due/missed for screenings and

    follow-up.

     Evaluate differences in adherence between pre-

    and post-PDSA cycles.

     EHR-based reviews support real-time monitoring

    and data-driven decisions (Davidson et al., 2022).

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Data Collection
    Method 2: Pre/Post
    Surveys & Observation
     Conduct pre/post provider surveys to

    assess guideline knowledge and
    confidence.

     Anonymous format to encourage honest
    feedback.

     Use observation logs during pilot to assess
    EHR tool utilization and workflow impact.

     Collect qualitative staff input to identify
    training gaps.

     Evidence supports mixed-methods for
    comprehensive QI evaluation (Guirguis-
    Blake et al., 2023).

    References

     Barry, M. J., Wolff, T. A., Pbert, L., Davidson, K. W., Fan, T. M., Krist, A. H., … &
    Nicholson, W. K. (2023). Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US
    Preventive Services Task Force methods for developing recommendations for
    preventive services. The Annals of Family Medicine, 21(2), 165-171.
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.
    google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle

     Davidson, K. W., Barry, M. J., Mangione, C. M., Cabana, M., Chelmow, D., Coker,
    T. R., … & US Preventive Services Task Force. (2022). Aspirin use to prevent
    cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation
    statement. Jama, 327(16), 1577-1584.
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022
    _us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf

     Guirguis-Blake, J. M., Evans, C. V., Coppola, E. L., Redmond, N., & Perdue, L. A.
    (2023). Screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents: updated
    evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Jama, 330(3), 261-274. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281

     Manandi, D., Tu, Q., Hafiz, N., Raeside, R., Redfern, J., & Hyun, K. (2023). The
    evaluation of the Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles for a healthcare quality
    improvement intervention in primary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health,
    30(1), NULL-NULL. https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123

     Roberti, J., Jorro-Barón, F., Ini, N., Guglielmino, M., Rodríguez, A. P., Echave, C., … &
    Alonso, J. P. (2025). Improving Antibiotic Use in Argentine Pediatric Hospitals: A
    Process Evaluation Using Normalization Process Theory. Pediatric Quality & Safety,
    10(1), e788.
    https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01
    949578-202501000-00010

    [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle)

    [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281)

    [https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123](https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    – Slide 1: Enhancing Compliance with USPSTF Preventive Screening Guidelines
    – Slide 2: Problem Statement and Aim Statement
    – Slide 3: Selected Strategy/Intervention
    – Slide 4: Anticipated Outcomes
    – Slide 5: Evaluation Measures
    – Slide 6: Required Information/Data
    – Slide 7: Data Collection Method 1: EHR Chart Review
    – Slide 8: Data Collection Method 2: Pre/Post Surveys & Observation
    – Slide 9: References

    **PresentationNU760-8H.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/presentationnu760-8h-pptx-10264635)

    **PresentationNU760-8H.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/presentationnu760-8h-pptx-10264635)

    **## Unit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF**

    1

    Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework

    Tiffany Williams

    Herzing University

    NU760-8H

    3/22/2025

    2

    Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework

    Gap recognition and filling in providing care are important to improving patient

    outcomes and staying compliant with evidence-based practice. The paper outlines a practice

    problem recognized in a clinical environment, formulates a problem statement, builds an aim

    statement, and names a framework that will be employed in creating a scholarly project to

    address the problem.

    Practice Setting and Population

    The practice setting is a primary care clinic with an adult patient population of 18 years

    and older. The clinic provides preventive care, chronic disease management, and acute care. The

    population consists of people from various socioeconomic statuses, with a high proportion of

    them being underserved and at risk for chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and

    cardiovascular disease. Despite evidence-based guidelines for preventive care, a conspicuous

    lack of uniform implementation of recommended screenings and interventions is observed.

    Description of the Problem

    The identified issue is the uneven application of United States Preventive Services Task

    Force (USPSTF) preventive screening guidelines, specifically cardiovascular risk factors for

    illness such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia (Barry et al., 2023). Chart review and

    observations revealed that the majority of patients with the routine screening due are not being

    screened on time in reality. Clinic performance indicators also confirm this deficiency, where

    65% of eligible patients for indicated screenings are receiving them only, falling short of the

    organization's goal of 90%.

    3

    Failure to screen per guidelines has various implications. Firstly, to delay earlier illness

    diagnosis that would otherwise be better treated through intervention earlier in the disease

    development process. Secondly, to develop avoidable complications like a heart attack or stroke,

    which would otherwise have been avoided by earlier identification and treatment. Thirdly,

    evidence-based care shortfall has been established, one of the indicators for quality health care.

    Problem Statement

    Processes of patient evaluation in the primary care clinic have not been consistent in

    adhering to USPSTF guidelines for preventive screening until now. This results in premature

    diagnosis of cardiovascular risk factors, which means unhealthy consequences that otherwise

    would have been averted if there was timely intervention.

    Aim Statement

    This project aims to increase follow-through with USPSTF recommendations for

    preventive screening, specifically cardiovascular disease risk factors, to 90% from 65% in a six-

    month period. This will be achieved by having a standardized screening process, educating staff

    on evidence-based recommendations, and reminders in the electronic health record system to

    trigger providers at the point of patient visits.

    Framework

    The model to implement with this project is the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, an

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) quality improvement model. The PDSA cycle is a

    rigorous cycle of testing and implementing changes at an organizational level (Roberti et al.,

    2025). The PDSA cycle contains four steps:

    1. Plan: Identify the problem, establish goals, and prepare for change.

    4

    2. Do: Implement the change at a trim level.

    3. Study: Compare results and determine if improvement was a consequence of the

    change.

    4. Act: Simplify the change from the result and implement it on an expanded scale.

    PDSA cycling is suitable for this project because it allows incremental testing of

    interventions such as the protocolized screening process and EHR reminders before large-scale

    implementation. It also addresses the project goal of quantitatively measuring improved

    screening rates. For example, at the "Plan" phase, the protocol for screening and EHR reminder

    design will be developed by the team. At the "Do" phase, the interventions will be pilot-tested

    with a small number of providers. The "Study" phase will entail screening rate monitoring and

    provider feedback collection, and the "Act" phase will entail scaling up proven interventions.

    Conclusion

    The inconsistent compliance with USPSTF guidelines for preventive screening within the

    primary clinic is a grave evidence-based practice deficit. By developing an obvious problem

    statement, formulating an aim statement concisely, and employing the PDSA cycle as an

    orienting framework, this project proposes to enhance screening rates and ultimately enhance

    patient outcomes. The structured process of the PDSA cycle ensures interventions are tested,

    refined, and implemented in such a way as to maximize their effectiveness and sustainability.

    5

    References

    Barry, M. J., Wolff, T. A., Pbert, L., Davidson, K. W., Fan, T. M., Krist, A. H., … & Nicholson,

    W. K. (2023). Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US Preventive Services

    Task Force methods for developing recommendations for preventive services. The Annals

    of Family Medicine, 21(2), 165-171.

    https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf

    Roberti, J., Jorro-Barón, F., Ini, N., Guglielmino, M., Rodríguez, A. P., Echave, C., … & Alonso,

    J. P. (2025). Improving Antibiotic Use in Argentine Pediatric Hospitals: A Process

    Evaluation Using Normalization Process Theory. Pediatric Quality & Safety, 10(1), e788.

    https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-

    202501000-00010

    [https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf](https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    **## Presentation5.PDF**

    Enhancing Compliance with
    USPSTF Preventive Screening
    Guidelines

    TIFFANY WILLIAMS

    HERZING UNIVERSITY

    NU760-8H

    4/15/2025

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Problem Statement and Aim Statement

     Problem Statement: Inconsistent adherence to USPSTF cardiovascular

    screening guidelines in a rural primary care clinic.

     Results in delayed diagnoses, missed preventive opportunities, and

    increased morbidity.

     Aim Statement: Improve compliance with USPSTF screening from 65% to

    90% over 6 months.

     Addresses cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia,

    and diabetes.

     Focus on equity: Enhance care for underserved populations in a rural

    setting.

    Selected

    Strategy/Intervention

     Implementation of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

    quality improvement framework.

     Incorporation of EHR reminders for screening

    adherence.

     Staff education sessions to reinforce USPSTF

    guideline adherence.

     Pilot test with 2–3 providers before full clinic rollout.

     Strategy is evidence-based and allows for

    continuous quality improvement (Manandi et al.,

    2023).

    Anticipated Outcomes

     Increase screening compliance to at
    least 90% within 6 months.

     Earlier identification of cardiovascular risk
    factors.

     Improved provider knowledge and
    confidence in following screening
    guidelines.

     Enhanced patient safety and health
    outcomes through preventive care.

     Promote a culture of accountability and
    evidence-based practice.

    Evaluation Measures

     Outcome Measures: Percentage of eligible
    patients who received all USPSTF-recommended
    screenings.

     Process Measures: Number of providers using EHR
    reminders and attending education sessions.

     Structure Measures: Availability of EHR decision
    support and training resources.

     Direct Measures: Audit of chart data for
    completed screenings.

     Support from literature: Structured evaluations
    improve sustainability of quality initiatives (Roberti
    et al., 2025).

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Required Information/Data

     Total number of eligible patients seen in the clinic monthly.

     Percentage of patients up-to-date on screenings pre- and post-
    intervention.

     EHR logs to track provider engagement with reminders.

     Staff participation data from educational sessions.

     Collect both quantitative metrics and qualitative feedback for robust

    analysis (Barry et al., 2023).

    Data Collection Method 1:

    EHR Chart Review

     Use EHR audit reports to assess screening

    completion rates.

     Track use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools

    by providers.

     Identify patients due/missed for screenings and

    follow-up.

     Evaluate differences in adherence between pre-

    and post-PDSA cycles.

     EHR-based reviews support real-time monitoring

    and data-driven decisions (Davidson et al., 2022).

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Data Collection
    Method 2: Pre/Post
    Surveys & Observation
     Conduct pre/post provider surveys to

    assess guideline knowledge and
    confidence.

     Anonymous format to encourage honest
    feedback.

     Use observation logs during pilot to assess
    EHR tool utilization and workflow impact.

     Collect qualitative staff input to identify
    training gaps.

     Evidence supports mixed-methods for
    comprehensive QI evaluation (Guirguis-
    Blake et al., 2023).

    References

     Barry, M. J., Wolff, T. A., Pbert, L., Davidson, K. W., Fan, T. M., Krist, A. H., … &
    Nicholson, W. K. (2023). Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US
    Preventive Services Task Force methods for developing recommendations for
    preventive services. The Annals of Family Medicine, 21(2), 165-171.
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.
    google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle

     Davidson, K. W., Barry, M. J., Mangione, C. M., Cabana, M., Chelmow, D., Coker,
    T. R., … & US Preventive Services Task Force. (2022). Aspirin use to prevent
    cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation
    statement. Jama, 327(16), 1577-1584.
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022
    _us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf

     Guirguis-Blake, J. M., Evans, C. V., Coppola, E. L., Redmond, N., & Perdue, L. A.
    (2023). Screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents: updated
    evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Jama, 330(3), 261-274. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281

     Manandi, D., Tu, Q., Hafiz, N., Raeside, R., Redfern, J., & Hyun, K. (2023). The
    evaluation of the Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles for a healthcare quality
    improvement intervention in primary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health,
    30(1), NULL-NULL. https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123

     Roberti, J., Jorro-Barón, F., Ini, N., Guglielmino, M., Rodríguez, A. P., Echave, C., … &
    Alonso, J. P. (2025). Improving Antibiotic Use in Argentine Pediatric Hospitals: A
    Process Evaluation Using Normalization Process Theory. Pediatric Quality & Safety,
    10(1), e788.
    https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01
    949578-202501000-00010

    [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle)

    [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281)

    [https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123](https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    – Slide 1: Enhancing Compliance with USPSTF Preventive Screening Guidelines
    – Slide 2: Problem Statement and Aim Statement
    – Slide 3: Selected Strategy/Intervention
    – Slide 4: Anticipated Outcomes
    – Slide 5: Evaluation Measures
    – Slide 6: Required Information/Data
    – Slide 7: Data Collection Method 1: EHR Chart Review
    – Slide 8: Data Collection Method 2: Pre/Post Surveys & Observation
    – Slide 9: References

    **PresentationNU760-8H.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/presentationnu760-8h-pptx-10264635)

    **## Unit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF**

    1

    Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework

    Tiffany Williams

    Herzing University

    NU760-8H

    3/22/2025

    2

    Unit 3: Scholarship of Application Part 1: Aim Statement and Framework

    Gap recognition and filling in providing care are important to improving patient

    outcomes and staying compliant with evidence-based practice. The paper outlines a practice

    problem recognized in a clinical environment, formulates a problem statement, builds an aim

    statement, and names a framework that will be employed in creating a scholarly project to

    address the problem.

    Practice Setting and Population

    The practice setting is a primary care clinic with an adult patient population of 18 years

    and older. The clinic provides preventive care, chronic disease management, and acute care. The

    population consists of people from various socioeconomic statuses, with a high proportion of

    them being underserved and at risk for chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and

    cardiovascular disease. Despite evidence-based guidelines for preventive care, a conspicuous

    lack of uniform implementation of recommended screenings and interventions is observed.

    Description of the Problem

    The identified issue is the uneven application of United States Preventive Services Task

    Force (USPSTF) preventive screening guidelines, specifically cardiovascular risk factors for

    illness such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia (Barry et al., 2023). Chart review and

    observations revealed that the majority of patients with the routine screening due are not being

    screened on time in reality. Clinic performance indicators also confirm this deficiency, where

    65% of eligible patients for indicated screenings are receiving them only, falling short of the

    organization's goal of 90%.

    3

    Failure to screen per guidelines has various implications. Firstly, to delay earlier illness

    diagnosis that would otherwise be better treated through intervention earlier in the disease

    development process. Secondly, to develop avoidable complications like a heart attack or stroke,

    which would otherwise have been avoided by earlier identification and treatment. Thirdly,

    evidence-based care shortfall has been established, one of the indicators for quality health care.

    Problem Statement

    Processes of patient evaluation in the primary care clinic have not been consistent in

    adhering to USPSTF guidelines for preventive screening until now. This results in premature

    diagnosis of cardiovascular risk factors, which means unhealthy consequences that otherwise

    would have been averted if there was timely intervention.

    Aim Statement

    This project aims to increase follow-through with USPSTF recommendations for

    preventive screening, specifically cardiovascular disease risk factors, to 90% from 65% in a six-

    month period. This will be achieved by having a standardized screening process, educating staff

    on evidence-based recommendations, and reminders in the electronic health record system to

    trigger providers at the point of patient visits.

    Framework

    The model to implement with this project is the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, an

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) quality improvement model. The PDSA cycle is a

    rigorous cycle of testing and implementing changes at an organizational level (Roberti et al.,

    2025). The PDSA cycle contains four steps:

    1. Plan: Identify the problem, establish goals, and prepare for change.

    4

    2. Do: Implement the change at a trim level.

    3. Study: Compare results and determine if improvement was a consequence of the

    change.

    4. Act: Simplify the change from the result and implement it on an expanded scale.

    PDSA cycling is suitable for this project because it allows incremental testing of

    interventions such as the protocolized screening process and EHR reminders before large-scale

    implementation. It also addresses the project goal of quantitatively measuring improved

    screening rates. For example, at the "Plan" phase, the protocol for screening and EHR reminder

    design will be developed by the team. At the "Do" phase, the interventions will be pilot-tested

    with a small number of providers. The "Study" phase will entail screening rate monitoring and

    provider feedback collection, and the "Act" phase will entail scaling up proven interventions.

    Conclusion

    The inconsistent compliance with USPSTF guidelines for preventive screening within the

    primary clinic is a grave evidence-based practice deficit. By developing an obvious problem

    statement, formulating an aim statement concisely, and employing the PDSA cycle as an

    orienting framework, this project proposes to enhance screening rates and ultimately enhance

    patient outcomes. The structured process of the PDSA cycle ensures interventions are tested,

    refined, and implemented in such a way as to maximize their effectiveness and sustainability.

    5

    References

    Barry, M. J., Wolff, T. A., Pbert, L., Davidson, K. W., Fan, T. M., Krist, A. H., … & Nicholson,

    W. K. (2023). Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US Preventive Services

    Task Force methods for developing recommendations for preventive services. The Annals

    of Family Medicine, 21(2), 165-171.

    https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf

    Roberti, J., Jorro-Barón, F., Ini, N., Guglielmino, M., Rodríguez, A. P., Echave, C., … & Alonso,

    J. P. (2025). Improving Antibiotic Use in Argentine Pediatric Hospitals: A Process

    Evaluation Using Normalization Process Theory. Pediatric Quality & Safety, 10(1), e788.

    https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-

    202501000-00010

    [https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf](https://www.annfammed.org/content/annalsfm/21/2/165.full.pdf)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    **## Presentation5.PDF**

    Enhancing Compliance with
    USPSTF Preventive Screening
    Guidelines

    TIFFANY WILLIAMS

    HERZING UNIVERSITY

    NU760-8H

    4/15/2025

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Problem Statement and Aim Statement

     Problem Statement: Inconsistent adherence to USPSTF cardiovascular

    screening guidelines in a rural primary care clinic.

     Results in delayed diagnoses, missed preventive opportunities, and

    increased morbidity.

     Aim Statement: Improve compliance with USPSTF screening from 65% to

    90% over 6 months.

     Addresses cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia,

    and diabetes.

     Focus on equity: Enhance care for underserved populations in a rural

    setting.

    Selected

    Strategy/Intervention

     Implementation of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

    quality improvement framework.

     Incorporation of EHR reminders for screening

    adherence.

     Staff education sessions to reinforce USPSTF

    guideline adherence.

     Pilot test with 2–3 providers before full clinic rollout.

     Strategy is evidence-based and allows for

    continuous quality improvement (Manandi et al.,

    2023).

    Anticipated Outcomes

     Increase screening compliance to at
    least 90% within 6 months.

     Earlier identification of cardiovascular risk
    factors.

     Improved provider knowledge and
    confidence in following screening
    guidelines.

     Enhanced patient safety and health
    outcomes through preventive care.

     Promote a culture of accountability and
    evidence-based practice.

    Evaluation Measures

     Outcome Measures: Percentage of eligible
    patients who received all USPSTF-recommended
    screenings.

     Process Measures: Number of providers using EHR
    reminders and attending education sessions.

     Structure Measures: Availability of EHR decision
    support and training resources.

     Direct Measures: Audit of chart data for
    completed screenings.

     Support from literature: Structured evaluations
    improve sustainability of quality initiatives (Roberti
    et al., 2025).

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Required Information/Data

     Total number of eligible patients seen in the clinic monthly.

     Percentage of patients up-to-date on screenings pre- and post-
    intervention.

     EHR logs to track provider engagement with reminders.

     Staff participation data from educational sessions.

     Collect both quantitative metrics and qualitative feedback for robust

    analysis (Barry et al., 2023).

    Data Collection Method 1:

    EHR Chart Review

     Use EHR audit reports to assess screening

    completion rates.

     Track use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools

    by providers.

     Identify patients due/missed for screenings and

    follow-up.

     Evaluate differences in adherence between pre-

    and post-PDSA cycles.

     EHR-based reviews support real-time monitoring

    and data-driven decisions (Davidson et al., 2022).

    ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA.

    Data Collection
    Method 2: Pre/Post
    Surveys & Observation
     Conduct pre/post provider surveys to

    assess guideline knowledge and
    confidence.

     Anonymous format to encourage honest
    feedback.

     Use observation logs during pilot to assess
    EHR tool utilization and workflow impact.

     Collect qualitative staff input to identify
    training gaps.

     Evidence supports mixed-methods for
    comprehensive QI evaluation (Guirguis-
    Blake et al., 2023).

    References

     Barry, M. J., Wolff, T. A., Pbert, L., Davidson, K. W., Fan, T. M., Krist, A. H., … &
    Nicholson, W. K. (2023). Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US
    Preventive Services Task Force methods for developing recommendations for
    preventive services. The Annals of Family Medicine, 21(2), 165-171.
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.
    google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle

     Davidson, K. W., Barry, M. J., Mangione, C. M., Cabana, M., Chelmow, D., Coker,
    T. R., … & US Preventive Services Task Force. (2022). Aspirin use to prevent
    cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation
    statement. Jama, 327(16), 1577-1584.
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022
    _us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf

     Guirguis-Blake, J. M., Evans, C. V., Coppola, E. L., Redmond, N., & Perdue, L. A.
    (2023). Screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents: updated
    evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Jama, 330(3), 261-274. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281

     Manandi, D., Tu, Q., Hafiz, N., Raeside, R., Redfern, J., & Hyun, K. (2023). The
    evaluation of the Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles for a healthcare quality
    improvement intervention in primary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health,
    30(1), NULL-NULL. https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123

     Roberti, J., Jorro-Barón, F., Ini, N., Guglielmino, M., Rodríguez, A. P., Echave, C., … &
    Alonso, J. P. (2025). Improving Antibiotic Use in Argentine Pediatric Hospitals: A
    Process Evaluation Using Normalization Process Theory. Pediatric Quality & Safety,
    10(1), e788.
    https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01
    949578-202501000-00010

    [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle)

    [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:EhtTAj4EDo4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=1814592995208635009&oi=lle)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2791399/jama_davidson_2022_us_220007_1650466044.25397.pdf)

    [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2807281)

    [https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123](https://www.publish.csiro.au/py/pdf/PY23123)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    [https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010](https://journals.lww.com/pqs/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=01949578-202501000-00010)

    – Slide 1: Enhancing Compliance with USPSTF Preventive Screening Guidelines
    – Slide 2: Problem Statement and Aim Statement
    – Slide 3: Selected Strategy/Intervention
    – Slide 4: Anticipated Outcomes
    – Slide 5: Evaluation Measures
    – Slide 6: Required Information/Data
    – Slide 7: Data Collection Method 1: EHR Chart Review
    – Slide 8: Data Collection Method 2: Pre/Post Surveys & Observation
    – Slide 9: References

    **PresentationNU760-8H.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/presentationnu760-8h-pptx-10264635)

  • [Solved] Conceptual Draft Chapter 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – SEdwardsChapter1.docx **SEdwardsChapter1.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sedwardschapter1-docx) **SEdwardsChapter1.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https:…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – SEdwardsChapter1.docx

    **SEdwardsChapter1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sedwardschapter1-docx)

    **SEdwardsChapter1.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sedwardschapter1-docx)

  • [Solved] Tiff week 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Tiff week 7 Assignment KTA Part 3: Evaluation Measures Instructions Utilize the template attached to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment. – [\ \ Week7-AlternateInterventionEvaluationWorksheet_11387653.PDF](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Tiff week 7

    Assignment KTA Part 3: Evaluation Measures

    Instructions

    Utilize the template attached to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment.

    – [\
    \
    Week7-AlternateInterventionEvaluationWorksheet_11387653.PDF](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week7-alternateinterventionevaluationworksheet-11387653-pdf-10266997 "Week7-AlternateInterventionEvaluationWorksheet_11387653.PDF")
    – [\
    \
    TiffUnit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/tiffunit3scholarshipofapplicationpart1-pdf-10267321 "TiffUnit3ScholarshipofApplicationPart1.PDF")
    – [\
    \
    Presentation114181996.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/presentation114181996-pptx "Presentation114181996.pptx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] interview questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Reading

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Pick out i ran this article. Explain how it helps you understand the bigger ideas in the article. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Pick out i ran this article. Explain how it helps you understand the bigger ideas in the article.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    nursing – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## WritingAssignmentRubricStudyPlan4.docx – Screenshot2025-04-16at8.57.34AM.png **## WritingAssignmentRubricStudyPlan4.docx** Written Assignment: NCLEX RN Study Plan | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | | **Criteria/ Points** | **Excellent** | **Good** | …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    nursing

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## WritingAssignmentRubricStudyPlan4.docx

    – Screenshot2025-04-16at8.57.34AM.png

    **## WritingAssignmentRubricStudyPlan4.docx**

    Written Assignment: NCLEX RN Study Plan

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria/ Points** | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** |
    | #### Content Quality and Relevance<br>**(40%)** | · Thoroughly identifies and discusses a variety of effective NCLEX-RN study tips.<br>· Explains how each tip can be applied to enhance exam preparation.<br>· Provides specific examples and evidence-based strategies for success.<br>· Clearly relates study tips to preparation for the NCLEX-RN exam. (<br>**7.2-8 pts)** | · Identifies and discusses multiple NCLEX-RN study tips.<br>· Includes some application or explanation of the tips, though detail may be limited.<br>· Makes general connections to NCLEX-RN exam preparation.<br>**(6-7.1 pts)** | · Lists study tips with little explanation or connection to NCLEX-RN exam preparation.<br>· Provides minimal examples or evidence to support strategies. <br>**(4.8-5.9 pts)** | · Fails to identify relevant study tips or connect them to NCLEX-RN preparation.<br>· Content is inaccurate, incomplete, or irrelevant.<br>**(0-4.7 pts)** |
    | **Analysis and Critical Thinking**<br>**(40%)** | · Demonstrates critical thinking by tailoring study tips to personal learning styles and needs.<br>· Analyzes why specific strategies are effective for NCLEX-RN preparation.<br>· Reflects on how these tips will be incorporated into their own study plan. (<br>**7.2-8 pts)** | · Includes some analysis and connection to personal study habits but lacks depth or specificity.<br>· General discussion of how tips could be applied without significant reflection<br>· <br>**(6-7.1 pts)** | · Limited analysis or personalization of study tips.<br>· Minimal reflection on application to their study plan. <br>**(4.8-5.9 pts)** | · Does not include analysis or connection to personal learning strategies.<br>· Lacks reflection or application to individual preparation <br>**(0-4.7 pts)** |
    | **Professional Writing and APA Formatting (20%)** | · Writing is professional, clear, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.<br>· Follows APA format consistently, including in-text citations and references.<br>· Adheres to the required word count (250-300 words). <br>**(3.6-4 points)** | · Writing is clear but may contain minor grammatical or spelling errors.<br>· APA format is mostly followed, with minor errors in citations or references.<br>· Stays within the word count range. (250-300 words). <br>**(3.2-3.5 points)** | · Writing contains noticeable grammatical or spelling errors that affect readability.<br>· APA format is inconsistently applied, with multiple errors in citations or references.<br>· Word count is outside the required range (25 words above or below the range) above or below).<br>**(2.4-3.1 points)** | · Writing is unclear or unprofessional, with frequent errors.<br>· APA formatting is not followed.<br>· Word count is significantly outside the required range. (more than 25 words above or below the range).<br>**(0-2.3 points)** |
    | **Total Points** | | | | |

    **Screenshot2025-04-16at8.57.34AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-04-16at8-57-34am-png)

    **Screenshot2025-04-16at8.57.34AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-04-16at8-57-34am-png)

    **## WritingAssignmentRubricStudyPlan4.docx**

    Written Assignment: NCLEX RN Study Plan

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria/ Points** | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** |
    | #### Content Quality and Relevance<br>**(40%)** | · Thoroughly identifies and discusses a variety of effective NCLEX-RN study tips.<br>· Explains how each tip can be applied to enhance exam preparation.<br>· Provides specific examples and evidence-based strategies for success.<br>· Clearly relates study tips to preparation for the NCLEX-RN exam. (<br>**7.2-8 pts)** | · Identifies and discusses multiple NCLEX-RN study tips.<br>· Includes some application or explanation of the tips, though detail may be limited.<br>· Makes general connections to NCLEX-RN exam preparation.<br>**(6-7.1 pts)** | · Lists study tips with little explanation or connection to NCLEX-RN exam preparation.<br>· Provides minimal examples or evidence to support strategies. <br>**(4.8-5.9 pts)** | · Fails to identify relevant study tips or connect them to NCLEX-RN preparation.<br>· Content is inaccurate, incomplete, or irrelevant.<br>**(0-4.7 pts)** |
    | **Analysis and Critical Thinking**<br>**(40%)** | · Demonstrates critical thinking by tailoring study tips to personal learning styles and needs.<br>· Analyzes why specific strategies are effective for NCLEX-RN preparation.<br>· Reflects on how these tips will be incorporated into their own study plan. (<br>**7.2-8 pts)** | · Includes some analysis and connection to personal study habits but lacks depth or specificity.<br>· General discussion of how tips could be applied without significant reflection<br>· <br>**(6-7.1 pts)** | · Limited analysis or personalization of study tips.<br>· Minimal reflection on application to their study plan. <br>**(4.8-5.9 pts)** | · Does not include analysis or connection to personal learning strategies.<br>· Lacks reflection or application to individual preparation <br>**(0-4.7 pts)** |
    | **Professional Writing and APA Formatting (20%)** | · Writing is professional, clear, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.<br>· Follows APA format consistently, including in-text citations and references.<br>· Adheres to the required word count (250-300 words). <br>**(3.6-4 points)** | · Writing is clear but may contain minor grammatical or spelling errors.<br>· APA format is mostly followed, with minor errors in citations or references.<br>· Stays within the word count range. (250-300 words). <br>**(3.2-3.5 points)** | · Writing contains noticeable grammatical or spelling errors that affect readability.<br>· APA format is inconsistently applied, with multiple errors in citations or references.<br>· Word count is outside the required range (25 words above or below the range) above or below).<br>**(2.4-3.1 points)** | · Writing is unclear or unprofessional, with frequent errors.<br>· APA formatting is not followed.<br>· Word count is significantly outside the required range. (more than 25 words above or below the range).<br>**(0-2.3 points)** |
    | **Total Points** | | | | |

    **Screenshot2025-04-16at8.57.34AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-04-16at8-57-34am-png)

    **## WritingAssignmentRubricStudyPlan4.docx**

    Written Assignment: NCLEX RN Study Plan

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria/ Points** | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Needs Improvement** | **Unsatisfactory** |
    | #### Content Quality and Relevance<br>**(40%)** | · Thoroughly identifies and discusses a variety of effective NCLEX-RN study tips.<br>· Explains how each tip can be applied to enhance exam preparation.<br>· Provides specific examples and evidence-based strategies for success.<br>· Clearly relates study tips to preparation for the NCLEX-RN exam. (<br>**7.2-8 pts)** | · Identifies and discusses multiple NCLEX-RN study tips.<br>· Includes some application or explanation of the tips, though detail may be limited.<br>· Makes general connections to NCLEX-RN exam preparation.<br>**(6-7.1 pts)** | · Lists study tips with little explanation or connection to NCLEX-RN exam preparation.<br>· Provides minimal examples or evidence to support strategies. <br>**(4.8-5.9 pts)** | · Fails to identify relevant study tips or connect them to NCLEX-RN preparation.<br>· Content is inaccurate, incomplete, or irrelevant.<br>**(0-4.7 pts)** |
    | **Analysis and Critical Thinking**<br>**(40%)** | · Demonstrates critical thinking by tailoring study tips to personal learning styles and needs.<br>· Analyzes why specific strategies are effective for NCLEX-RN preparation.<br>· Reflects on how these tips will be incorporated into their own study plan. (<br>**7.2-8 pts)** | · Includes some analysis and connection to personal study habits but lacks depth or specificity.<br>· General discussion of how tips could be applied without significant reflection<br>· <br>**(6-7.1 pts)** | · Limited analysis or personalization of study tips.<br>· Minimal reflection on application to their study plan. <br>**(4.8-5.9 pts)** | · Does not include analysis or connection to personal learning strategies.<br>· Lacks reflection or application to individual preparation <br>**(0-4.7 pts)** |
    | **Professional Writing and APA Formatting (20%)** | · Writing is professional, clear, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.<br>· Follows APA format consistently, including in-text citations and references.<br>· Adheres to the required word count (250-300 words). <br>**(3.6-4 points)** | · Writing is clear but may contain minor grammatical or spelling errors.<br>· APA format is mostly followed, with minor errors in citations or references.<br>· Stays within the word count range. (250-300 words). <br>**(3.2-3.5 points)** | · Writing contains noticeable grammatical or spelling errors that affect readability.<br>· APA format is inconsistently applied, with multiple errors in citations or references.<br>· Word count is outside the required range (25 words above or below the range) above or below).<br>**(2.4-3.1 points)** | · Writing is unclear or unprofessional, with frequent errors.<br>· APA formatting is not followed.<br>· Word count is significantly outside the required range. (more than 25 words above or below the range).<br>**(0-2.3 points)** |
    | **Total Points** | | | | |

    **Screenshot2025-04-16at8.57.34AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-04-16at8-57-34am-png)

  • [Solved] case study 2 week 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering case study 2 week 6.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] RISK MANAGEMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Assignment:** The CIO needs your assistance in building a risk management plan. The organization has implemented an electronic health record (EHR) system to comply with the provisions of the HITECH Act, which provides short-term incentives for using an EHR in a meaningful way and long-term penalti…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Assignment:** The CIO needs your assistance in building a risk management plan. The organization has implemented an electronic health record (EHR) system to comply with the provisions of the HITECH Act, which provides short-term incentives for using an EHR in a meaningful way and long-term penalties for failing to use an EHR.

    The CIO would like to extend the capabilities of the EHR to provide a portal through which patients can access their health records. The CIO explains that she has concerns about the idea of a patient portal, especially pertaining to the organization’s ability to comply with privacy and security laws. In addition, she is concerned about access to medical records in the event of some sort of natural disasters, such as a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, or flood.

    The CIO would like you to perform a risk analysis and develop a risk management plan focused on the patient portal to their EHR that addresses legal, regulatory, and environmental risks.

    You will complete each section of this report.

    Complete the following document using the [Risk Management Plan Template](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/HCIS420v6/hcis420_v6_wk5_risk_management_plan.docx):

    – Risk Identification
    – Risk Analysis
    – Explain techniques for      quantitative risk analysis for selected critical IT functions.
    – Explain techniques for      qualitative risk analysis for selected critical IT functions.
    – Risk Response Planning
    – Analyze techniques for risk      response planning for selected critical IT functions.
    – Risk Monitoring
    – Analyze techniques for risk      monitoring planning for selected critical IT functions.

    Write a 700- to 1,050-word memo to discuss the importance of regulatory requirements, security and privacy laws, and monitoring compliance. Your memo should:

    – Explain the major regulatory      requirements that have a direct effect on IT in a health care organization      when outsourcing the identified IT function.
    – Explain how security and privacy      laws affect the design and operation of the outsourced IT function.
    – Explain the role of IT in      monitoring compliance with the organization’s risk management policies and      plans when outsourcing the identified IT function.

    Cite at least 3 reputable references. One reference must be your textbook, _Managing Risk in Information Systems_. Reputable references include trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality.

    Format your presentation according to APA guidelines. Include a title page, detailed speaker notes, and a references page.

    **Discussion:** Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    Not all risks have an equal probability of occurrence, nor are they all equal in potential impact.

    – How would you organize your      project team to sort the high-probability and high-impact risks from the      low-probability and low-impact risks and manage them accordingly?
    – Also, consider as a project      manager, a big part of your role is customer communications. Define your      communication strategy and its frequency and type to be sure all      stakeholders are constantly informed.

    **Replies: 100 words response**

    **Tiffany Wilson**-To effectively manage risks with varying probabilities and impacts and maintain robust stakeholder communication, I would implement the following strategies:

    **Risk Prioritization and Team Organization:** My approach to risk management involves a structured, multi-faceted strategy, leveraging both qualitative and quantitative analysis, and is embedded within a clear organizational framework.

    1. **Establish a Risk Management      Committee:** I      would form a dedicated Risk Management Committee (RMC) composed of subject      matter experts from diverse of the project, including engineering,      finance, operations, and legal. This ensures a comprehensive assessment of      risks from multiple perspectives.
    2. **Qualitative Risk Assessment:** Initially, the RMC would conduct      a qualitative risk assessment to categorize risks based on their      probability and impact. This involves

    – **Probability Assessment:** Utilizing a predefined      probability scale (e.g., Very Low, Low, Moderate, High, Very High) with      corresponding numerical ranges (e.g., 0.01-0.99), the RMC would estimate      the likelihood of each identified risk occurring
    – **Impact Assessment:** Similarly, the RMC would assess      the potential impact of each risk on project objectives (e.g., schedule,      cost, performance) using a defined impact scale (e.g., Negligible, Minor,      Moderate, Major, Catastrophic) with corresponding quantitative thresholds (e.g.,      $0-$10k cost overrun, 1-week schedule delay).
    – **Risk Matrix:** The results of the quantitative      assessment are then mapped onto a risk matrix (Probability vs. Impact).      this visual tool categorizes risks into zones.

            3. **Quantitative Risk Assessment:** For high-priority risks identified in the qualitative assessment, a more rigorous quantitative analysis would be performed.

    **Kristi Spears-** Organizing a Project Team for Risk Prioritization and Management

    Since risks vary in probability and impact, sorting and managing them effectively requires a structured approach. Here’s how I would organize a project team to handle this:

    1. Risk Assessment &      Categorization

    – Establish a Risk Review      Committee consisting of senior project members, IT security experts, and      compliance officers.
    – Use a Risk Matrix to classify      risks into high-probability, high-impact vs. low-probability, low-impact      categories.
    – Conduct brainstorming sessions      and historical data analysis to estimate risk likelihood and severity.

    1. Role Assignments for Risk      Handling

    – Risk Owners: Assign specific      team members to oversee critical risks and mitigation efforts.
    – Mitigation Specialists: Task      security engineers or analysts with designing control measures for      high-priority risks.
    – Compliance Monitors: Ensure      regulatory adherence, particularly for IT risks affecting legal and      privacy concerns.
    – Contingency Planning Team:      Develop backup strategies for risks that cannot be fully mitigated.

    1. Risk Management Strategies

    – High-Probability, High-Impact      Risks: Immediate mitigation required through strict security protocols,      system redundancies, or vendor reassessments.
    – High-Probability, Low-Impact      Risks: Develop operational safeguards with minimal disruption.
    – Low-Probability, High-Impact      Risks: Maintain contingency plans for rare but severe incidents (e.g.,      ransomware attacks).
    – Low-Probability, Low-Impact      Risks: Monitor passively without extensive resource allocation.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Mission, Vision, and Ethics in Organizations

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **Preparation** Complete the following: – Choose an organization. (It can be something that interests you, where you work, or a company you are familiar with.) – Access the organization’s website and research …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    **Preparation**

    Complete the following:

    – Choose an organization. (It can be something that interests you, where you work, or a company you are familiar with.)
    – Access the organization’s website and research the mission and vision statements and code of ethics.
    – Review the QuickStart: Mission and Vision media piece to support your understanding of these concepts.
    – Answer the questions on the top of the template:
    – What is your chosen organization?
    – What are the mission and vision statements for your organization?
    – What type of organizational structure makes sense for this organization and why?
    – Identify the key components included in your organization's code of ethics. Then write a paragraph detailing the ethical principles these components represent. Are there any others you think are missing that are commonly found in a code of ethics and why would they be important for your chosen organization?
    – Include the references where you found the above information.

    – [\
    \
    assessment_2_template.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessment-2-template-docx-10264603 "assessment_2_template.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 509 SLP3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    As you read the chapters below, consider the following questions: – What are the assumptions of the political frame? – Why and why is it useful? Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Chapter 9: Power, conflict, and coalition. _Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership_ (6 ed.). (pp. 1…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    As you read the chapters below, consider the following questions:

    – What are the assumptions of the political frame?
    – Why and why is it useful?

    Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Chapter 9: Power, conflict, and coalition. _Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership_ (6 ed.). (pp. 181 – 200).

    Wiley.

    Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Chapter 10: The manager as politician. _Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership_ (6 ed.). (pp. 201 – 216).

    Wiley.

    1. Introduction
    2. Discuss the assumptions of the political perspective.
    3. Reflect on the four skills of the manager as a politician.
    1. Provide a brief summary of the four skills.
    2. Select one of the four skills that you believe to be the most important as a leader; explain why you selected this skill.
    4. Apply the selected political skill to leading a major change in an educational setting.
    1. Provide a brief outline of the proposed change.
    2. Discuss how the selected political skill will assist you in leading the proposed change.
    1. How might it help you avoid conflict?
    2. How might it help you to build coalitions?
    5. Conclusion

    – 2 years ago